Risk Communication Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting, 74505-74506 [E8-28887]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 236 / Monday, December 8, 2008 / Notices
or endorses the Cambridge Filter Method.
The Commission also has clarified that if
tobacco firms choose to make claims based
on this discredited testing method, these
claims will not enjoy any presumption of
legitimacy. Going forward, advertisements for
cigarettes, like any other ads, will continue
to be scrutinized under Section 5 of the FTC
Act.
Now that the FTC has removed its apparent
imprimatur from the testing method, I urge
the scientific community to redouble its
efforts. Scientists must develop a test that
provides consumers with a meaningful
measure of the tar and nicotine yields of the
cigarettes they smoke.
More importantly, I urge the next Congress
to reintroduce S. 625, the Family Smoking
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. This
bill includes several key consumer protection
measures. First, the bill allows the Food and
Drug Administration to regulate tobacco
products. The FDA has lacked any authority
in this area for decades, and tobacco
manufacturers have exploited the void. The
bill would authorize FDA scientists to track,
analyze, and regulate the components of
tobacco products. If this legislation is
enacted, the FDA will wield more effective
tools to protect public health.
Second, the bill properly assigns authority
to the FDA to issue certain regulations
concerning tar and nicotine yields, including
requirements governing the methodology for
determining tar and nicotine yields and the
public disclosure of information about such
yields or other constituents of tobacco smoke.
For more than 10 years, the Commission has
recommended to Congress that one of the
government’s science-based public health
agencies be given jurisdiction over cigarette
testing. The FDA clearly has the requisite
scientific expertise for this task.
Third, the bill appropriately preserves
coordination between the FTC and the FDA
in enforcing labeling and marketing
requirements. This kind of enforcement is a
core element of the FTC’s consumer
protection mission. The bill wisely preserves
the FTC’s jurisdiction over unfair or
deceptive cigarette advertising.
The regulation of the manufacture, sale,
advertising, and marketing of tobacco
products is a tall order, but it is crucial to the
health of our country, especially its young
people. Smoking is a continuing public
health crisis. It deserves to be at the top of
the new administration’s public health
agenda.
CONCURRING STATEMENT OF
COMMISSIONER JON LEIBOWITZ
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Regarding Rescission of Guidance on
Cigarette Testing Methodology
Our action today ensures that tobacco
companies may not wrap their misleading tar
and nicotine ratings in a cloak of government
sponsorship. Simply put, the FTC will not be
a smokescreen for tobacco companies’
shameful marketing practices.
For far too long, tobacco companies have
advertised cigarettes using ‘‘light’’ and ‘‘low
tar’’ descriptors based on machine-tested tar
and nicotine results while knowing that the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Dec 05, 2008
Jkt 217001
cigarettes, when actually smoked by people,
would not deliver lower tar or nicotine.1
And for far too long, the tobacco industry
has attempted to use the FTC imprimatur to
imply government endorsement of the tar
and nicotine ratings.2 The implication that
this agency had mandated disclosure of the
ratings furthered the misconception that the
descriptors—and the ratings themselves—
said something meaningful about the
absolute or relative health characteristics of
the cigarettes.3 To the contrary, the FTC has
never required disclosure of tar and nicotine
yields, nor authorized the use of descriptors.4
There’s another benefit to our action today.
Efforts to educate consumers about the facts
behind cigarette ratings—i.e., that the ratings
can’t predict the amount of tar and nicotine
a smoker gets from any particular cigarette,
in part because smokers compensate for the
lower tar and nicotine yield by inhaling more
deeply and smoking longer5—will no longer
have to battle a contrary message on cigarette
advertisements that may have led to
consumer confusion about what the ratings
really mean.
After today, there should be no confusion:
there is no such thing as a safe—or even a
safer—cigarette.
[FR Doc. E8–28969 Filed 12–5–08: 8:45 am]
[Billing Code: 6750–01–S]
1 In the U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit against
the major tobacco companies under the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
(‘‘RICO’’), U.S. District Court Judge Kessler ruled
that the tobacco company defendants had ‘‘falsely
marketed and promoted low tar/light cigarettes as
less harmful than full-flavor cigarettes in order to
keep people smoking and sustain corporate
revenues’’ and that they ‘‘internally recognized that
low tar cigarettes are not less harmful than fullflavor cigarettes.’’ United States v. Philip Morris
USA, 449 F. Supp. 2d 1, 430, 456 (D.D.C. 2006); see
also id. at 430–561. The case is now on appeal.
2 For example, in defending against a class action
lawsuit against manufacturers of ‘‘light’’ and ‘‘lowtar’’ cigarettes, Philip Morris wrongly asserted that
the FTC ‘‘has required tobacco companies to
disclose tar and nicotine yields in cigarette
advertising using a government-mandated testing
methodology and has authorized them to use
descriptors as shorthand references to those
numerical test results.’’ Brief for Petitioner Philip
Morris at 2, Altria v. Good, No. 07–562 (U.S. Mar.
31, 2008).
3 Tobacco company research conducted literally
decades ago—which was never presented to the
Commission—indicated that lower tested yields did
not entail a reduction in smoke intake. Brief for the
United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting
Respondents at 9, Altria v. Good, No. 07–562 (U.S.
June 18, 2008). See also id. at 9–11 (setting forth
instances where tobacco companies failed to
disclose to the Commission, or affirmatively
downplayed, effects of compensation); Philip
Morris, 449 F. Supp. 2d at 431 (‘‘Defendants did not
disclose the full extent and depth of their
knowledge and understanding of smoker
compensation to the public health community or to
government regulators.’’).
4 See Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae
Supporting Respondents at 15, Altria v. Good, No.
07–562 (U.S. June 18, 2008).
5 E.g., FTC Consumer Alert, Up in Smoke: The
Truth About Tar and Nicotine Ratings,
(www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/
alt069.pdf) (May 2000).
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74505
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0038]
Risk Communication Advisory
Committee; Notice of Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces a forthcoming
meeting of a public advisory committee
of the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). The meeting will be open to the
public.
Name of Committee: Risk
Communication Advisory Committee.
General Function of the Committee:
To provide advice and
recommendations to the agency on
FDA’s regulatory issues.
Date and Time: The meeting will be
held on February 26, 2009, from 8 a.m.
to 5 p.m. and February 27, 2009, from
8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Addresses: Submit electronic
comments and information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Written comments should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852, by close of
business on March 31, 2009. All
comments received will be posted
without change, including any personal
information provided. Comments
received on or before February 12, 2009,
will be provided to the committee
before or at the meeting; comments
received after that time will still be
considered by FDA.
Location: National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) Conference Center,
429 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington,
DC 20594 (at Metro’s L’Enfant Plaza
station; parking is limited and public
transportation is recommended.)
Contact Person: Lee L. Zwanziger,
Office of the Commissioner, Office of
Policy, Planning and Preparedness,
Office of Planning (HFP–60), Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane
(for express delivery: rm. 15–22),
Rockville, MD, 20857, 301–827–2895,
FAX: 301–827–3285, Food and Drug
Administration, or FDA Advisory
Committee Information Line, 1–800–
741–8138 (301–443–0572 in the
Washington, DC area), code
8732112560. Please call the Information
Line for up-to-date information on this
meeting. A notice in the Federal
Register about last minute modifications
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
74506
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 236 / Monday, December 8, 2008 / Notices
that impact a previously announced
advisory committee meeting cannot
always be published quickly enough to
provide timely notice. Therefore, you
should always check the agency’s Web
site and call the appropriate advisory
committee hot line/phone line to learn
about possible modifications before
coming to the meeting.
Agenda: On February 26 and 27,
2009, there will be a discussion of
different types of prescription drug
information currently available to
patients in the form of Medication
Guides, Patient Package Inserts (PPIs),
and Consumer Medication Information
(CMI).
CMI is information developed by the
private sector and distributed with each
prescription at the pharmacy, as
provided by law. On August 6, 1996,
Public Law 104–180 was enacted and
adopted the following goals with regard
to CMI: 75 percent of people receiving
new prescriptions would receive
‘‘useful’’ written patient information
with their prescriptions by 2000, and 95
percent of people receiving new
prescriptions would receive ‘‘useful’’
written patient information with their
prescriptions by 2006. The committee
will review and discuss a recently
completed survey designed to assess
whether the year 2006 goal was
achieved (for results, see committee
background, to be posted as described in
this document). The committee will also
discuss possible next steps for assuring
that consumers receive useful written
information with their prescriptions.
The survey is a followup to the year
2001 evaluation of the quality of
consumer medication information
dispensed in community pharmacies
(https://www.fda.gov/cder/reports/
prescriptionInfo/default.htm). To assist
the private sector in meeting the year
2006 goal, FDA published a guidance on
producing ‘‘Useful Written Consumer
Medication Information (CMI)’’ (https://
www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/
7139fnl.htm).
In 1998, FDA published a final rule
that required the development of a
Medication Guide for a small number of
drugs that the agency considered posed
a serious and significant health concern
(63 FR 66378, December 1, 1998). A
Medication Guide is produced by the
drug sponsor, reviewed and approved
by FDA and is a component of the
approved professional product labeling.
An FDA public meeting was held in
June 2007 to obtain feedback on the
development, distribution,
comprehensibility and accessibility of
Medication Guides. At that meeting,
stakeholders voiced a concern that for
prescription drugs with both a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Dec 05, 2008
Jkt 217001
Medication Guide and CMI, patients
would be getting unnecessarily
duplicative information (meeting
summary: https://www.fda.gov/cder/
meeting/SummaryPublicHearing
MedicationGuides.htm).
Finally, PPIs are also required for
some drugs and are considered part of
the approved product labeling, for
example, for estrogens and oral
contraceptives.
FDA will seek the advice of the
advisory committee, and commentary
from stakeholders and from the public,
for consideration as it considers
appropriate next steps to improve the
communication of information about
prescription drugs to patients.
FDA intends to make background
material available to the public no later
than 2 business days before the meeting.
If FDA is unable to post the background
material on its Web site prior to the
meeting, the background material will
be made publicly available at the
location of the advisory committee
meeting, and the background material
will be posted on FDA’s Web site after
the meeting. Background material is or
will be available at https://www.fda.gov/
ohrms/dockets/ac/acmenu.htm, click on
the year 2009 and scroll down to the
appropriate advisory committee link.
Procedure: Interested persons may
present data, information, or views,
orally or in writing, on issues pending
before the committee. Written
submissions may be made to the contact
person on or before February 19, 2009.
Oral presentations from the public will
be scheduled between approximately 1
p.m. and 3 p.m. on February 26 and
between approximately 10:30 a.m. and
11:30 a.m. on February 27. Those
desiring to make formal oral
presentations should notify the contact
person and submit a brief statement of
the general nature of the evidence or
arguments they wish to present, the
names and addresses of proposed
participants, and an indication of the
approximate time requested to make
their presentation on or before February
19, 2009. Time allotted for each
presentation may be limited. If the
number of registrants requesting to
speak is greater than can be reasonably
accommodated during the scheduled
open public hearing session, FDA may
conduct a lottery to determine the
speakers for the scheduled open public
hearing session. The contact person will
notify interested persons regarding their
request to speak by February 20, 2009.
Persons attending FDA’s advisory
committee meetings are advised that the
agency is not responsible for providing
access to electrical outlets.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FDA welcomes the attendance of the
public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to
accommodate persons with physical
disabilities or special needs. If you
require special accommodations due to
a disability, please contact Lee L.
Zwanziger at least 7 days in advance of
the meeting.
FDA is committed to the orderly
conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at
https://www.fda.gov/oc/advisory/
default.htm for procedures on public
conduct during advisory committee
meetings.
Notice of this meeting is given under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2).
Dated: November 26, 2008.
Randall W. Lutter,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E8–28887 Filed 12–5–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
Privacy Act of 1974; Establishment of
a New System of Records
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Proposed establishment of a
new Privacy Act system of records.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5
U.S.C. 552a), the Office of the Secretary
of the Department of the Interior is
issuing public notice of its intent to
establish a new Privacy Act system of
records, DOI–84, ‘‘National Business
Center Datamart.’’
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Any persons interested in
commenting on this new, proposed
system of records may do so by
submitting comments in writing to the
Office of the Secretary Acting Privacy
Act Officer, Linda S. Thomas, U.S.
Department of the Interior, MS–116 SIB,
1951 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20240, or by e-mail to
Linda_Thomas@nbc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Stover, Chief, Applications
Management and Technology Branch,
National Business Center, U.S.
Department of the Interior, 7301 West
Mansfield Avenue, Denver, CO 80235–
2230 or by e-mail at
Mark_A_Stover@nbc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
information contained in Datamart is
derived from two existing systems
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 236 (Monday, December 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74505-74506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28887]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0038]
Risk Communication Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
Name of Committee: Risk Communication Advisory Committee.
General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
Date and Time: The meeting will be held on February 26, 2009, from
8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and February 27, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Addresses: Submit electronic comments and information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments are to be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Written
comments should be submitted to the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, by close of business on March 31, 2009. All
comments received will be posted without change, including any personal
information provided. Comments received on or before February 12, 2009,
will be provided to the committee before or at the meeting; comments
received after that time will still be considered by FDA.
Location: National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Conference
Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594 (at Metro's
L'Enfant Plaza station; parking is limited and public transportation is
recommended.)
Contact Person: Lee L. Zwanziger, Office of the Commissioner,
Office of Policy, Planning and Preparedness, Office of Planning (HFP-
60), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane (for express
delivery: rm. 15-22), Rockville, MD, 20857, 301-827-2895, FAX: 301-827-
3285, Food and Drug Administration, or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC
area), code 8732112560. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date
information on this meeting. A notice in the Federal Register about
last minute modifications
[[Page 74506]]
that impact a previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot
always be published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore,
you should always check the agency's Web site and call the appropriate
advisory committee hot line/phone line to learn about possible
modifications before coming to the meeting.
Agenda: On February 26 and 27, 2009, there will be a discussion of
different types of prescription drug information currently available to
patients in the form of Medication Guides, Patient Package Inserts
(PPIs), and Consumer Medication Information (CMI).
CMI is information developed by the private sector and distributed
with each prescription at the pharmacy, as provided by law. On August
6, 1996, Public Law 104-180 was enacted and adopted the following goals
with regard to CMI: 75 percent of people receiving new prescriptions
would receive ``useful'' written patient information with their
prescriptions by 2000, and 95 percent of people receiving new
prescriptions would receive ``useful'' written patient information with
their prescriptions by 2006. The committee will review and discuss a
recently completed survey designed to assess whether the year 2006 goal
was achieved (for results, see committee background, to be posted as
described in this document). The committee will also discuss possible
next steps for assuring that consumers receive useful written
information with their prescriptions.
The survey is a followup to the year 2001 evaluation of the quality
of consumer medication information dispensed in community pharmacies
(https://www.fda.gov/cder/reports/prescriptionInfo/default.htm). To
assist the private sector in meeting the year 2006 goal, FDA published
a guidance on producing ``Useful Written Consumer Medication
Information (CMI)'' (https://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/7139fnl.htm).
In 1998, FDA published a final rule that required the development
of a Medication Guide for a small number of drugs that the agency
considered posed a serious and significant health concern (63 FR 66378,
December 1, 1998). A Medication Guide is produced by the drug sponsor,
reviewed and approved by FDA and is a component of the approved
professional product labeling. An FDA public meeting was held in June
2007 to obtain feedback on the development, distribution,
comprehensibility and accessibility of Medication Guides. At that
meeting, stakeholders voiced a concern that for prescription drugs with
both a Medication Guide and CMI, patients would be getting
unnecessarily duplicative information (meeting summary: https://
www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/SummaryPublicHearingMedicationGuides.htm).
Finally, PPIs are also required for some drugs and are considered
part of the approved product labeling, for example, for estrogens and
oral contraceptives.
FDA will seek the advice of the advisory committee, and commentary
from stakeholders and from the public, for consideration as it
considers appropriate next steps to improve the communication of
information about prescription drugs to patients.
FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is or
will be available at https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/acmenu.htm,
click on the year 2009 and scroll down to the appropriate advisory
committee link.
Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
February 19, 2009. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 1 p.m. and 3 p.m. on February 26 and between
approximately 10:30 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. on February 27. Those desiring
to make formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and
submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to
make their presentation on or before February 19, 2009. Time allotted
for each presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants
requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated
during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a
lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing
session. The contact person will notify interested persons regarding
their request to speak by February 20, 2009.
Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical disabilities or special needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability, please contact Lee L. Zwanziger at
least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at https://www.fda.gov/oc/advisory/
default.htm for procedures on public conduct during advisory committee
meetings.
Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).
Dated: November 26, 2008.
Randall W. Lutter,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-28887 Filed 12-5-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S