New Competitive Product, 74213-74214 [E8-28836]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 235 / Friday, December 5, 2008 / Notices
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
3. All Others. International posts who
choose not to be members of the EMS
Cooperative.
Request at 2.
In support of its Request, the Postal
Service filed a redacted version of the
Governors’ Decision establishing prices
and classifications for Inbound Express
Mail International.5 The Postal Service
also filed a Statement of Supporting
Justification as required by 39 CFR
3020.32,6 certification of the Governors’
vote,7 and certification of compliance
with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).8 In addition, the
Postal Service indicates that it filed an
unredacted copy of the Governors’
Decision, the agreements with foreign
posts and other supporting documents
designed to establish compliance with
39 CFR 3015.5 under seal. Request at 1,
n.2.
In the Statement of Supporting
Justification, Brian T. Hutchins,
Manager, International Postal Relations,
explains that in the instant case, the
Postal Service has considered that the
new product could have been requested
to be merged with the existing product
Inbound International Expedited
Services 1. He observes, however, the
Postal Service only deals with inbound
EMS from foreign posts which have one
set of demand and market
characteristics and a single set of pricing
formulas approved by the Governors. He
also states that the prices are established
through negotiation as with the China
Post Group 9 or unilaterally pursuant to
the UPU EMS Cooperative.
He notes the rationale for the Postal
Service’s submission of a separate
request is because the pricing formula
for EMS was finalized through the UPU
in August 2008 with the knowledge that
the pricing would be established before
the Commission had an opportunity to
review the pricing formula for the first
time under the Postal Accountability
and Enhancement Act (PAEA). The
decision was made to submit this
Request as a second product for
inbound EMS rather than as an addition
to the existing product (Inbound
International Expedited Services 1). The
Postal Service views this as a method to
simplify the process of adding the
product. Request, Attachment 2, at 2. He
observes that the Commission could
determine that inbound EMS from
foreign posts with the established UPU
prices should be included with the
existing inbound EMS product (Inbound
5 See
Attachment 1 to the Request.
Attachment 2 to the Request.
7 See Attachment 3 to the Request.
8 See Attachment 4 to the Request.
9 See Docket No. CP2008–7, PRC Order No. 84,
Order Concerning the China Post Group Inbound
EMS Agreement, June 27, 2008.
6 See
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Dec 04, 2008
Jkt 217001
International Expedited Services 1).
However, he states that with either
approach, approval of the product will
‘‘improve the Postal Service’s
competitive posture, while enabling the
Commission to verify that prices set
according to EMS Cooperative
procedures cover their attributable costs
and make a positive contribution * * *
toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the
Postal Service’s total institutional costs
paid for by competitive products.’’ Id. at
2–3.
W. Ashley Lyons, Manager, Corporate
Financial Planning, Finance
Department, certifies that the contract
complies with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).
Request, Attachment 4. He asserts that
the EMS agreement ‘‘prices demonstrate
that EMS should cover its attributable
costs and preclude the subsidization of
competitive products by market
dominant products.’’ Id.
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
Governors’ Decision and the EMS
agreements with foreign posts, under
seal. It maintains that the EMS
agreements with foreign posts, related
financial information, and the
Governors’ Decision should remain
under seal as they contain pricing, cost,
and other information that are highly
confidential. Request at 5.
The Postal Service’s existing EMS
agreements with the proposed pricing
and classification changes established in
the Governors’ Decision are scheduled
to take effect January 1, 2009 after
review by the Commission. Governors’
Decision at 3.
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2009–10 and CP2009–12 for
consideration of the Request pertaining
to the proposed Inbound International
Expedited Services 2 product and the
related agreements, respectively. In
keeping with practice, these dockets are
addressed on a consolidated basis for
purposes of this Order; however, future
filings should be made in the specific
docket in which issues being addressed
pertain.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in the captioned
dockets are consistent with the policies
of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR
part 3015, and 39 CFR 3020 subpart B.
Comments are due no later than
December 5, 2008. The public portions
of these filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
It is Ordered:
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74213
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2009–10 and CP2009–12 for
consideration of the matters raised in
each docket.
1. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
2. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
December 5, 2008.
3. The Secretary shall arrange for the
publication of this Order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–28816 Filed 12–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2009–12 and CP2009–14;
Order No. 143]
New Competitive Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request to
add Express Mail & Priority Mail
Contract 2 to the Competitive Product
List. The Postal Service has also filed
one related contract. This notice
addresses procedural steps associated
with these filings.
DATES: Comments due December 10,
2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 25, 2008, the Postal
Service filed a formal request pursuant
to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30
et seq. to add Express Mail & Priority
Mail Contract 2 to the Competitive
Product List.1 The Postal Service asserts
that the Parcel Express Mail & Priority
Mail Contract 2 product is a competitive
product ‘‘not of general applicability’’
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Add Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Establishment of Rates and Class Not of General
Applicability, November 25, 2008 (Request).
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
74214
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 235 / Friday, December 5, 2008 / Notices
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
within the meaning of 39 U.S.C.
3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Request has
been assigned Docket No. MC2009–12.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a contract
related to the proposed new product
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39
CFR 3015.5. The contract has been
assigned Docket No. CP2009–14.
Request. The Request incorporates (1)
a redacted version of the Governors’
Decision authorizing the new product;
(2) a redacted version of the contract; (3)
requested changes in the Mail
Classification Schedule product list; (4)
a statement of supporting justification as
required by 39 CFR 3020.32; and (5)
certification of compliance with 39
U.S.C. 3633(a).2 Substantively, the
Request seeks to add Express Mail &
Priority Mail Contract 2 to the
Competitive Product List. Id. at 1–2.
In the statement of supporting
justification, Kim Parks, Manager, Sales
and Communications, Expedited
Shipping, asserts that the service to be
provided under the contract will cover
its attributable costs, make a positive
contribution to institutional costs, and
increase contribution toward the
requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal
Service’s total institutional costs. Id.,
Attachment D. Thus, Ms. Parks
contends there will be no issue of
subsidization of competitive products
by market dominant products as a result
of this contract. Id.
Related contract. A redacted version
of the specific Express Mail & Priority
Mail Contract 2 is included with the
Request. The contract is for 3 years and
is to be effective 1 day after the
Commission provides all necessary
regulatory approvals. The Postal Service
represents that the contract is consistent
with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a) and 39 CFR
3015.7(c). See id., Attachment A and
Attachment E. It notes that actual
performance under this contract could
vary from estimates, but concludes that
the contract will remain profitable. Id.,
Attachment A.
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
Governors’ Decision and the specific
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2,
2 Attachment A to the Request consists of the
redacted Decision of the Governors of the United
States Postal Service on Establishment of Rate and
Class Not of General Applicability for Express Mail
& Priority Mail Contract 2 (Governors’ Decision No.
08–22). The Governors’ Decision includes an
attachment which provides an analysis of the
proposed Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2.
Attachment B is the redacted version of the
contract. Attachment C shows the requested
changes to the Mail Classification Schedule product
list. Attachment D provides a statement of
supporting justification for this Request.
Attachment E provides the certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 Dec 04, 2008
Jkt 217001
under seal.3 In its Request, the Postal
Service maintains that the contract and
related financial information, including
the customer’s name and the
accompanying analyses that provide
prices, terms, conditions, and financial
projections should remain under seal.
Id. at 2–3.
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
II. Notice of Filings
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request to
add Parcel Select & Parcel Return
Service Contract 1 to the Competitive
Product List. The Postal Service has also
filed one related contract. This notice
addresses procedural steps associated
with these filings.
DATES: Comments due December 10,
2008.
The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2009–12 and CP2009–14 for
consideration of the Request pertaining
to the proposed Express Mail & Priority
Mail Contract 2 product and the related
contract, respectively. In keeping with
practice, these dockets are addressed on
a consolidated basis for purposes of this
Order; however, future filings should be
made in the specific docket in which
issues being addressed pertain.
Interested persons may submit
comments on whether the Postal
Service’s filings in the captioned
dockets are consistent with the policies
of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642 and 39
CFR part 3015 and 39 CFR 3020 subpart
B. Comments are due no later than
December 10, 2008. The public portions
of these filings can be accessed via the
Commission’s Web site (https://
www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L.
Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
It is Ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
Nos. MC2009–12 and CP2009–14 for
consideration of the matters raised in
each docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L.
Harrington is appointed to serve as
officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in these
proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in
these proceedings are due no later than
December 10, 2008.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for the
publication of this Order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–28836 Filed 12–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
3 Documents filed under seal must include a hard
copy table of contents page listing, inter alia, the
titles of the documents being filed under seal.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket Nos. MC2009–11 and CP2009–13;
Order No. 142]
New Competitive Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 25, 2008, the Postal
Service filed a formal request pursuant
to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30
et seq. to add Parcel Select & Parcel
Return Service Contract 1 to the
Competitive Product List.1 The Postal
Service asserts that the Parcel Select &
Parcel Return Service Contract 1
product is a competitive product ‘‘not of
general applicability’’ within the
meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at
1. The Request has been assigned
Docket No. MC2009–11.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a contract
related to the proposed new product
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39
CFR 3015.5. The contract has been
assigned Docket No. CP2009–13.
Request. The Request incorporates (1)
a redacted version of the Governors’
Decision authorizing the new product;
(2) a redacted version of the contract; (3)
requested changes in the Mail
Classification Schedule product list; (4)
a statement of supporting justification as
required by 39 CFR 3020.32; and (5)
certification of compliance with 39
U.S.C. 3633(a).2 Substantively, the
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Add Parcel Select & Parcel Return Service Contract
1 to Competitive Product List and Notice of
Establishment of Rates and Class Not of General
Applicability, November 25, 2008 (Request).
2 Attachment A to the Request consists of the
redacted Decision of the Governors of the United
States Postal Service on Establishment of Rate and
Class Not of General Applicability for Parcel Select
E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM
05DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 235 (Friday, December 5, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74213-74214]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28836]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. MC2009-12 and CP2009-14; Order No. 143]
New Competitive Product
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a recently-filed Postal Service
request to add Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2 to the
Competitive Product List. The Postal Service has also filed one related
contract. This notice addresses procedural steps associated with these
filings.
DATES: Comments due December 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202-789-6820 and stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On November 25, 2008, the Postal Service filed a formal request
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30 et seq. to add Express
Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2 to the Competitive Product List.\1\ The
Postal Service asserts that the Parcel Express Mail & Priority Mail
Contract 2 product is a competitive product ``not of general
applicability''
[[Page 74214]]
within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Request has
been assigned Docket No. MC2009-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Express
Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2 to Competitive Product List and
Notice of Establishment of Rates and Class Not of General
Applicability, November 25, 2008 (Request).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Postal Service contemporaneously filed a contract related to
the proposed new product pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 CFR
3015.5. The contract has been assigned Docket No. CP2009-14.
Request. The Request incorporates (1) a redacted version of the
Governors' Decision authorizing the new product; (2) a redacted version
of the contract; (3) requested changes in the Mail Classification
Schedule product list; (4) a statement of supporting justification as
required by 39 CFR 3020.32; and (5) certification of compliance with 39
U.S.C. 3633(a).\2\ Substantively, the Request seeks to add Express Mail
& Priority Mail Contract 2 to the Competitive Product List. Id. at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Attachment A to the Request consists of the redacted
Decision of the Governors of the United States Postal Service on
Establishment of Rate and Class Not of General Applicability for
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2 (Governors' Decision No. 08-
22). The Governors' Decision includes an attachment which provides
an analysis of the proposed Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 2.
Attachment B is the redacted version of the contract. Attachment C
shows the requested changes to the Mail Classification Schedule
product list. Attachment D provides a statement of supporting
justification for this Request. Attachment E provides the
certification of compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the statement of supporting justification, Kim Parks, Manager,
Sales and Communications, Expedited Shipping, asserts that the service
to be provided under the contract will cover its attributable costs,
make a positive contribution to institutional costs, and increase
contribution toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal Service's
total institutional costs. Id., Attachment D. Thus, Ms. Parks contends
there will be no issue of subsidization of competitive products by
market dominant products as a result of this contract. Id.
Related contract. A redacted version of the specific Express Mail &
Priority Mail Contract 2 is included with the Request. The contract is
for 3 years and is to be effective 1 day after the Commission provides
all necessary regulatory approvals. The Postal Service represents that
the contract is consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a) and 39 CFR 3015.7(c).
See id., Attachment A and Attachment E. It notes that actual
performance under this contract could vary from estimates, but
concludes that the contract will remain profitable. Id., Attachment A.
The Postal Service filed much of the supporting materials,
including the Governors' Decision and the specific Express Mail &
Priority Mail Contract 2, under seal.\3\ In its Request, the Postal
Service maintains that the contract and related financial information,
including the customer's name and the accompanying analyses that
provide prices, terms, conditions, and financial projections should
remain under seal. Id. at 2-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Documents filed under seal must include a hard copy table of
contents page listing, inter alia, the titles of the documents being
filed under seal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Notice of Filings
The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2009-12 and CP2009-14 for
consideration of the Request pertaining to the proposed Express Mail &
Priority Mail Contract 2 product and the related contract,
respectively. In keeping with practice, these dockets are addressed on
a consolidated basis for purposes of this Order; however, future
filings should be made in the specific docket in which issues being
addressed pertain.
Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal
Service's filings in the captioned dockets are consistent with the
policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642 and 39 CFR part 3015 and 39
CFR 3020 subpart B. Comments are due no later than December 10, 2008.
The public portions of these filings can be accessed via the
Commission's Web site (https://www.prc.gov).
The Commission appoints Paul L. Harrington to serve as Public
Representative in these dockets.
It is Ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket Nos. MC2009-12 and CP2009-14
for consideration of the matters raised in each docket.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. Harrington is appointed to
serve as officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent
the interests of the general public in these proceedings.
3. Comments by interested persons in these proceedings are due no
later than December 10, 2008.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for the publication of this Order in
the Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-28836 Filed 12-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P