Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes, 74080-74082 [E8-28819]
Download as PDF
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
74080
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 235 / Friday, December 5, 2008 / Proposed Rules
referendum in order to trigger the
conduct of a referendum. If a
referendum is requested, it will be held
within 1 year of that determination.
On October 1, 1999, through
November 16, 1999, a nationwide
Request for Referendum was conducted
to determine if there was sufficient
interest among soybean producers to
vote on whether to continue the soybean
checkoff program. Ten percent of the
600,813 soybean producers nationwide
(not in excess of one-fifth of which may
be producers in any one State) needed
to participate in the Request for
Referendum to trigger a referendum.
Only 17,970 eligible soybean producers
completed valid requests.
Five years later, another Request for
Referendum was conducted May 1,
2004, through May 28, 2004. As in the
prior Request for Referendum, the
purpose was to determine if there was
sufficient interest among soybean
producers to vote on whether to
continue the soybean checkoff Program.
To be eligible to participate in the
Request for Referendum, producers or
the producer entity that they are
authorized to represent had to certify
and provide supporting documentation
showing that they or the producer entity
they represent paid an assessment
sometime during the representative
period between January 1, 2002, and
December 31, 2003. Of the total 663,880
soybean producers eligible to
participate, 3,206 valid Requests for
Referendum were completed. This
number did not meet the requisite
number of 66,388; therefore, a
referendum was not conducted.
In accordance with the Act, another
Request for Referendum will be
conducted in 2009. In this proposed
rule, data provided by USDA’s FSA
would be used to amend the number of
soybean producers in preparation for
this upcoming Request for Referendum.
Presently, § 1220.616 of the Order states
that the number of soybean producers in
the United States is 663,880. The latest
number of soybean producers identified
by FSA is 589,182 soybean producers
for crop years 2006 and 2007, using
information based on acreage reports
compiled on a daily basis. The data
were sorted in such a manner as to
include all producers that were engaged
in the production of soybeans in at least
one of the 2 years and exclude counting
a producer more than once if that
producer engaged in production during
both years. Using the last two crop years
for which complete data is available
ensures that all eligible producers are
counted, as some producers use
soybeans in rotation with other crops
and do not plant soybeans every year or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:59 Dec 04, 2008
Jkt 217001
the market for some producers in a
particular crop year may not have been
conducive to growing soybeans. This
methodology is consistent with that
used during the last amendment to
§ 1220.616 in 2004.
In addition to the changes proposed
relating to the number of eligible
soybean producers, AMS also intends to
amend §§ 1220.622 and 1220.628 to
update Web site addresses and office
locations as a result of internal changes
within the agency.
A 15-day comment period is provided
for interested persons to comment on
the proposed changes to section
1220.616. This comment period is
deemed appropriate because the Act
provides that the Secretary, every 5
years after the initial continuation
referendum, will give soybean
producers the opportunity to request
additional referenda on the Order. A 15day comment period will allow
sufficient time to publish a final rule to
amend § 1220.616 before the upcoming
Request for Referendum. As such, the
number of soybean producers eligible to
participate in a Request for Referendum
will be established, and a Request for
Referendum can be conducted as early
in 2009 as practicable.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1220
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Agricultural
research, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Soybeans and soybean
products.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, it is proposed that 7 CFR part
1220 be amended as follows:
PART 1220—SOYBEAN PROMOTION,
RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER
INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 1220
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6301–6311 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
Subpart F—Procedures To Request a
Referendum
2. In § 1220.616, paragraph (d) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 1220.616
General.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) For purposes of paragraphs (b) and
(c) of this section, the number of
soybean producers in the United States
is determined to be 589,182.
§ 1220.622
[Amended]
3. In § 1220.622, paragraph (b) the
Web site ‘‘www.ams.usda.gov/lsg/mpb/
rp-soy.htm’’ is removed and a new Web
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
site ‘‘www.ams.usda.gov/
lsmarketingprograms’’ is added in its
place.
4. In § 1220.628, paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 1220.628 Results of the request for
referendum.
(a) The Administrator, FSA, shall
submit to the Administrator, AMS, the
reports from all State FSA offices. The
Administrator, AMS shall tabulate the
results of the Request for Referendum.
USDA will issue an official press release
announcing the results of the Request
for Referendum and publish the same
results in the Federal Register. In
addition, USDA will post the official
results at the following Web site:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/
lsmarketingprograms. Subsequently,
State reports and related papers shall be
available for public inspection upon
request during normal business hours in
the Marketing Programs Branch office,
Livestock and Seed Program, AMS,
USDA, Room 2628–S, STOP 0251, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 26, 2008.
James E. Link,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8–28674 Filed 12–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1275; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–167–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300,
–400, and –500 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737–100, –200,
–200C, –300, –400, and –500 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would
require repetitive detailed and high
frequency eddy current inspections to
detect cracks of the backup intercostals
and the upper sill of the forward airstair
doorway, and applicable corrective
actions. This proposed AD would also
provide for an optional terminating
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 235 / Friday, December 5, 2008 / Proposed Rules
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
action, which would eliminate the need
for repetitive inspections. This proposed
AD results from a report indicating that
cracks were found in the backup
intercostals and upper sill web of the
forward airstair doorway. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking of the backup
intercostals and upper sill web of the
forward airstair doorway, which could
result in a rapid loss of cabin pressure.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–9990; fax 206–766–5682; email DDCS@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–
1221 or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Howard Hall, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6430; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:59 Dec 04, 2008
Jkt 217001
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–1275; Directorate Identifier
2007–NM–167–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating
that cracks were found in the backup
intercostals and upper sill web of the
forward airstair doorway on a Boeing
Model 737–200 series airplane. The
cracks were found in the upper sill web
at the stop fitting at station (STA) 312
and in the two backup intercostals of
the stop support structure at STA 322.7
and STA 333.3. Investigation revealed
the cracks are due to fatigue caused by
cyclic loads acting on the upper sill
web, which is stabilized by the backup
intercostals. Fatigue cracking of the
backup intercostals and upper sill web
of the forward airstair doorway, if not
detected and corrected, could result in
a rapid loss of cabin pressure.
The configuration of the subject area
on certain Boeing Model 737–100,
–200C, –300, –400, and –500 series
airplanes is almost identical to that on
the affected Boeing Model 737–200
series airplanes. Therefore, those Boeing
Model 737–100, –200C, –300, –400, and
–500 series airplanes are subject to the
unsafe condition revealed on the Boeing
Model 737–200 series airplanes.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737–53A1269, dated
May 17, 2007. The service bulletin
describes procedures for repetitive
detailed and high frequency eddy
current inspections to detect fatigue
cracking of the backup intercostals and
the upper sill web of the forward airstair
doorway, and applicable corrective
actions. The service bulletin also
describes procedures for an optional
terminating action, which would
eliminate the need for the repetitive
inspections.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74081
The corrective and optional
terminating actions include doing a
repair/preventive modification to install
new backup intercostals with radius
fillers, installing the preventive
modification filler and doubler plate,
and repairing any cracked upper sill
web.
The service information also specifies
the following compliance times:
• For the initial inspections: The
threshold is prior to 45,000 or 49,500
total flight cycles depending on the
flight cycles on the airplane. The grace
period is 1,000 or 4,500 flight cycles
depending on the flight cycles on the
airplane.
• For the applicable repetitive
inspections: The compliance time is at
intervals of 4,500 flight cycles.
• For the applicable corrective
actions: The compliance time is before
further flight.
Accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information is intended to
adequately address the unsafe
condition.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other airplanes of this same
type design. For this reason, we are
proposing this AD, which would require
accomplishing certain actions specified
in the service information described
previously. The proposed AD also
provides for an optional terminating
action, as specified in the service
bulletin, for the repetitive inspection
requirements.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 1,712 airplanes of the
affected design in the worldwide fleet.
This proposed AD would affect about
509 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
proposed inspections would take about
2 work hours per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of
the proposed AD for U.S. operators
would be $81,440, or $160 per airplane,
per inspection cycle.
The optional terminating action, if
done, would take about 9 work hours,
at an average labor rate of $80 per work
hour. Required parts would cost
between $533 and $566 per airplane,
depending on the airplane
configuration. Based on these figures,
the estimated cost of the optional
terminating action would range between
$1,253 and $1,286 per airplane,
depending on the airplane
configuration.
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
74082
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 235 / Friday, December 5, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section
for a location to examine the regulatory
evaluation.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:59 Dec 04, 2008
Jkt 217001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13
by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2008–1275;
Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–167–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on
this AD action by January 20, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737–
100, –200, –200C, –300, –400, and –500
series airplanes, certificated in any category;
as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
737–53A1269, dated May 17, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report indicating
that cracks were found in the backup
intercostals and upper sill web of the forward
airstair doorway. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracking of the
backup intercostals and upper sill web of the
forward airstair doorway, which could result
in a rapid loss of cabin pressure.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections
(f) At the applicable compliance times and
repeat intervals listed in the tables of
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1269, dated
May 17, 2007 (hereafter ‘‘the service
bulletin’’), except as provided by paragraphs
(f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD: Do
repetitive detailed and high frequency eddy
current inspections to detect cracks of the
backup intercostals and the upper sill of the
forward airstair doorway, and applicable
corrective actions by accomplishing all the
applicable actions specified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin. Do the applicable corrective actions
before further flight.
(1) Where the service bulletin specifies a
compliance time from the release date of the
service bulletin, this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where the columns identified as
‘‘Airplane Flight Cycles’’ in the tables of the
service bulletin specify less than 45,000 total
flight cycles for certain actions, this AD
affects airplanes having less than or equal to
45,000 total flight cycles.
(3) Where the columns identified as
‘‘Repeat Interval’’ in the tables of the service
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
bulletin specify an interval of 4,500 flight
cycles for all conditions, this AD requires
repetitive inspections only if no crack is
found during any inspection required by
paragraph (f) of this AD.
Optional Terminating Action
(g) Accomplishing the backup intercostal
repair/preventative modification and/or the
upper door sill web repair, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–53A1269,
dated May 17, 2007, ends all the
corresponding repetitive inspection
requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
Howard Hall, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (917) 917–6430; fax
(425) 917–6590; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO,
FAA, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington on
November 26, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–28819 Filed 12–4–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 31
[REG–158747–06]
RIN 1545–BG45
Withholding Under Internal Revenue
Code Section 3402(t)
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations relating to
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 235 (Friday, December 5, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 74080-74082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28819]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-1275; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-167-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -
300, -400, and -500 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500
series airplanes. This proposed AD would require repetitive detailed
and high frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracks of the
backup intercostals and the upper sill of the forward airstair doorway,
and applicable corrective actions. This proposed AD would also provide
for an optional terminating
[[Page 74081]]
action, which would eliminate the need for repetitive inspections. This
proposed AD results from a report indicating that cracks were found in
the backup intercostals and upper sill web of the forward airstair
doorway. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the backup intercostals and upper sill web of the forward
airstair doorway, which could result in a rapid loss of cabin pressure.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 20,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207;
telephone 206-544-9990; fax 206-766-5682; e-mail DDCS@boeing.com;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or
425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Hall, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6430; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1275;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-167-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating that cracks were found in the
backup intercostals and upper sill web of the forward airstair doorway
on a Boeing Model 737-200 series airplane. The cracks were found in the
upper sill web at the stop fitting at station (STA) 312 and in the two
backup intercostals of the stop support structure at STA 322.7 and STA
333.3. Investigation revealed the cracks are due to fatigue caused by
cyclic loads acting on the upper sill web, which is stabilized by the
backup intercostals. Fatigue cracking of the backup intercostals and
upper sill web of the forward airstair doorway, if not detected and
corrected, could result in a rapid loss of cabin pressure.
The configuration of the subject area on certain Boeing Model 737-
100, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes is almost identical
to that on the affected Boeing Model 737-200 series airplanes.
Therefore, those Boeing Model 737-100, -200C, -300, -400, and -500
series airplanes are subject to the unsafe condition revealed on the
Boeing Model 737-200 series airplanes.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1269, dated
May 17, 2007. The service bulletin describes procedures for repetitive
detailed and high frequency eddy current inspections to detect fatigue
cracking of the backup intercostals and the upper sill web of the
forward airstair doorway, and applicable corrective actions. The
service bulletin also describes procedures for an optional terminating
action, which would eliminate the need for the repetitive inspections.
The corrective and optional terminating actions include doing a
repair/preventive modification to install new backup intercostals with
radius fillers, installing the preventive modification filler and
doubler plate, and repairing any cracked upper sill web.
The service information also specifies the following compliance
times:
For the initial inspections: The threshold is prior to
45,000 or 49,500 total flight cycles depending on the flight cycles on
the airplane. The grace period is 1,000 or 4,500 flight cycles
depending on the flight cycles on the airplane.
For the applicable repetitive inspections: The compliance
time is at intervals of 4,500 flight cycles.
For the applicable corrective actions: The compliance time
is before further flight.
Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is
intended to adequately address the unsafe condition.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing certain actions specified in the
service information described previously. The proposed AD also provides
for an optional terminating action, as specified in the service
bulletin, for the repetitive inspection requirements.
Costs of Compliance
There are about 1,712 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This proposed AD would affect about 509 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The proposed inspections would take about 2 work hours
per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed AD for U.S. operators
would be $81,440, or $160 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The optional terminating action, if done, would take about 9 work
hours, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts
would cost between $533 and $566 per airplane, depending on the
airplane configuration. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of
the optional terminating action would range between $1,253 and $1,286
per airplane, depending on the airplane configuration.
[[Page 74082]]
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2008-1275; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
167-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January
20, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-100, -200, -200C, -300,
-400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1269, dated May
17, 2007.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report indicating that cracks were
found in the backup intercostals and upper sill web of the forward
airstair doorway. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
fatigue cracking of the backup intercostals and upper sill web of
the forward airstair doorway, which could result in a rapid loss of
cabin pressure.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspections
(f) At the applicable compliance times and repeat intervals
listed in the tables of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1269, dated May 17, 2007 (hereafter
``the service bulletin''), except as provided by paragraphs (f)(1),
(f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD: Do repetitive detailed and high
frequency eddy current inspections to detect cracks of the backup
intercostals and the upper sill of the forward airstair doorway, and
applicable corrective actions by accomplishing all the applicable
actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin. Do the applicable corrective actions before further
flight.
(1) Where the service bulletin specifies a compliance time from
the release date of the service bulletin, this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
(2) Where the columns identified as ``Airplane Flight Cycles''
in the tables of the service bulletin specify less than 45,000 total
flight cycles for certain actions, this AD affects airplanes having
less than or equal to 45,000 total flight cycles.
(3) Where the columns identified as ``Repeat Interval'' in the
tables of the service bulletin specify an interval of 4,500 flight
cycles for all conditions, this AD requires repetitive inspections
only if no crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (f) of this AD.
Optional Terminating Action
(g) Accomplishing the backup intercostal repair/preventative
modification and/or the upper door sill web repair, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1269, dated May 17, 2007, ends all the corresponding
repetitive inspection requirements of paragraph (f) of this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, ATTN: Howard Hall, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-
120S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone (917) 917-6430; fax (425) 917-6590; has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, to make those findings. For a
repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification
basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to
this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington on November 26, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-28819 Filed 12-4-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P