Use of Bureau of Reclamation Land, Facilities, and Waterbodies, 74326-74342 [E8-28740]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
• Bureau of Reclamation
• Reclamation Bureau

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 235 (Friday, December 5, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74326-74342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28740]



[[Page 74325]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





Department of the Interior





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Bureau of Reclamation



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



43 CFR Part 429



Use of Bureau of Reclamation Land, Facilities, and Waterbodies; Final 
Rule

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 235 / Friday, December 5, 2008 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 74326]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

43 CFR Part 429

RIN 1006-AA51


Use of Bureau of Reclamation Land, Facilities, and Waterbodies

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is adopting this final 
rule on the use of Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies. This 
final rule addresses activities involving the possession or occupancy 
of any portion of, and the extraction or disturbance of any natural 
resources from, Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies. This 
final rule supersedes the current rule which was originally published 
in 1983 and partially revised in April 2006.

DATES: This final rule is effective January 5, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Rizzi, Mail Code: 84-53000, 
Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225. Telephone: 
(303) 445-2900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The current rule, 43 CFR part 429, titled Procedure to Process and 
Recover the Value of Rights-of-Use and Administrative Costs Incurred In 
Permitting Such Use (current rule), established the procedures to 
recover administrative costs associated with processing ``right-of-
use'' applications and the value of rights-of-use granted by 
Reclamation to applicants for the use of Reclamation land. Sections of 
the current rule were modified, in part, in 2006 to correlate with 43 
CFR part 423, titled Public Conduct on Bureau of Reclamation 
Facilities, Lands, and Waterbodies.
    This final rule addresses activities involving the possession or 
occupancy of any portion of, and the extraction or disturbance of any 
natural resources from, Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies. 
Regulations addressing public access to Reclamation property and 
occasional public activities such as hiking, camping, boating, and 
hunting, and closures are contained in 43 CFR part 423.
    The demand for use of Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies 
for many different kinds of activities has increased dramatically since 
Reclamation began building Federal water supply, flood control, and 
hydropower projects over 100 years ago. With increased and varied uses 
has come confusion among the potential users of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies about the process of applying for the 
various types of uses, the charges and fees associated with such uses, 
and other concerns. The current rule does not adequately address this 
confusion nor does it address prohibited and unauthorized uses of 
Reclamation's land, facilities, and waterbodies and associated 
penalties.
    The Independent Offices Appropriation Act (IOAA) (31 U.S.C. 9701), 
September 13, 1982, as amended, sets forth Congress' intent that any 
use, permit, or similar thing of value provided by an agency is to be 
self-sustaining and that the IOAA authorizes agencies to prescribe 
rules establishing charges for such uses. The 1993 revision of the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-25 established Federal 
policy directing that administrative costs be recovered for Government 
services and fees for the use or sale of Government goods or resources 
also be charged. OMB Circular A-25 provides information on the scope 
and types of activities subject to use fees and the basis on which 
these fees are established. It also provides guidance for agencies in 
implementing such fees and charges. The use of Reclamation land, 
facilities, or waterbodies is a use of Government resources, and as 
such, the IOAA and OMB Circular A-25 direct Reclamation to recover the 
costs and fees associated with the use of these resources.
    Section 10 (43 U.S.C. 373) of the Reclamation Act of June 17, 1902, 
provides the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) with the authority 
to issue rules as necessary for the purposes of carrying out the 
provisions of the Act. Section 10 (43 U.S.C. 387) of the Reclamation 
Project Act of 1939 provides the Secretary the authority, in his 
discretion, to grant leases, licenses, easements, and rights-of-way. 
These two Acts provide Reclamation with the general statutory authority 
to issue rules on authorizing or prohibiting uses of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies.
    This final rule addresses:
    (a) The possession or occupancy of any portion of, or the 
extraction or disturbance of any natural resource from, Reclamation 
land, facilities, and waterbodies;
    (b) The procedures to follow when the proposed use involves a 
Reclamation easement;
    (c) The procedures to apply for use of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies that involves the possession or occupancy 
of any portion of, or the extraction or disturbance of any natural 
resource from, Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies;
    (d) The criteria Reclamation will use to evaluate applications;
    (e) Our statutory authority and the basis for charging application 
fees, recovering administrative costs, and collecting use fees 
associated with authorized uses;
    (f) Conditions under which application fees, administrative costs, 
or use fees may be waived or reduced if determined appropriate by 
Reclamation or as currently listed in OMB Circular A-25;
    (g) The required terms and conditions associated with use 
authorizations;
    (h) Prohibited uses of Reclamation land, facilities, and 
waterbodies and how Reclamation will resolve unauthorized uses;
    (i) The criteria Reclamation will use to evaluate existing 
authorizations for otherwise prohibited uses of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies; and
    (j) The decisions and appeals process applicable to actions taken 
under this part.

II. Revision of Existing Rule

    On December 20, 1983, Reclamation published 43 CFR part 429 titled 
Procedure to Process and Recover the Value of Rights-of-Use and 
Administrative Costs Incurred in Permitting Such Use in the Federal 
Register at 48 FR 56223. Sections of this rule were revised on April 
17, 2006, in the Federal Register at 71 FR 19802 to better correlate 
with 43 CFR part 423. The sections that were revised or added were 
Sec.  429.1 Purpose, Sec.  429.2 Definitions, Sec.  429.3 Establishment 
of the value of rights-of-use, Sec.  429.6 Applications for rights-of-
use, Sec.  429.12 Applicability, and Sec.  429.13 General Restrictions.
    On July 18, 2007, Reclamation published a notice in the Federal 
Register at 72 FR 39530 announcing the availability of the proposed 
rule for a 90-day public comment period ending on October 16, 2007. As 
a result of comments received, the proposed rule was revised. 
Reclamation again published a notice of the proposed rule in the 
Federal Register at 73 FR 42236 on July 18, 2008, for a 60-day public 
comment period ending on September 16, 2008. During the 60-day public 
comment period, informational meetings regarding the proposed rule were 
held in each of Reclamation's five regions.

[[Page 74327]]

    When the public comment period closed on the proposed rule, 
Reclamation considered the comments and incorporated them, where 
appropriate. This final rule, titled Use of Bureau of Reclamation Land, 
Facilities, and Waterbodies, supersedes the 1983 version and its 2006 
modifications in their entirety.

III. Summary of Changes, Comments, and Responses

    This section of the preamble describes changes from the proposed 
rule published on July 18, 2008, and provides responses to the comments 
received on that proposed rule by section. Approximately 260 
individuals submitted comments during the 60-day comment period which 
ended on September 16, 2008.
    Comments received that are similar in nature have been categorized 
by subject and in some instances have been combined with related 
comments. Comments and our responses on general issues not related to a 
specific section of the preamble or text of the proposed rule are 
arranged first. This section is followed by comments regarding the 
preamble of the proposed rule and our responses; and lastly, the 
changes we have made, comments received, and our responses related to 
specific sections of the text of the proposed rule.

General Comments and Responses

    Comment: In its current form the proposed rule fairly manages the 
lands in Reclamation's charge and represents well the needs and desires 
of the people. It balances new and existing uses with an eye to the 
future.
    Response: No response required.
    Comment: The revised proposed rule provides for an acceptable 
process for fair and open decisions, and demonstrates that the public 
comment process does work and our government listens to its managing 
partners and the public at large.
    Response: No response required.
    Comment: It is more effective to manage a weed control program 
locally than from out of state.
    Response: Weed control programs are managed at the local or 
regional office level.
    Comment: Exclusions for the special circumstances at our reservoir 
should be made in the rule.
    Response: We suspect that all holders of recreational and 
residential use authorizations would be quick to note the unique and 
special circumstances associated with their reservoir. But no reservoir 
is so unique that the requirements for Reclamation to manage its land, 
facilities, and waterbodies and to comply with Federal requirements, 
such as the Independent Offices Appropriation Act and Office of 
Management and Budget Circular A-25, could be put aside. Rather, we 
have incorporated into this rule flexibility so that local Reclamation 
offices can factor in special circumstances in managing use 
authorizations. For example: Use fees are determined locally; minimum 
time frames have been established for certain deficiencies to be 
corrected, but the local Reclamation office can provide more time when 
needed; minimum time frames have been established as to when 
inspections must occur, but the local Reclamation office can provide 
more frequent inspections if warranted; etc.
    Comment: Why doesn't a land use agency such as the U.S.D.A. Forest 
Service manage our large recreational area?
    Response: We are continually exploring opportunities to work with 
managing partners including the U.S.D.A. Forest Service, National Park 
Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and 
State and local agencies to manage our recreation areas through formal 
agreements. We have been very successful in this endeavor in that only 
42 of the 289 recreation areas located on Reclamation lands and 
waterbodies are directly managed by Reclamation. However, to date, we 
have not been able to find a governmental entity that is willing to 
take over management of the recreation at the reservoir in question.

Preamble Comments and Responses

    Only those sections of the preamble to the proposed rule that 
received comments are discussed in this section.

IV. Informational Meetings

    Comment: The meeting date in Albuquerque, New Mexico, conflicted 
with the monthly board meetings of the Carlsbad Irrigation District and 
the Elephant Butte Irrigation District preventing the two major 
districts in New Mexico from participating in the informational 
meeting.
    Response: The dates and times for the informational meetings were 
established by the local office hosting the meeting and every attempt 
was made to meet the needs of the concerned public and to provide 
adequate advance notice of the meetings. The direct phone number for 
Reclamation's contact person was included in the published rule to 
allow for maximum availability to persons and groups unable to attend 
public meetings scheduled in their area. We regret that such a conflict 
occurred. Written comments were submitted by Elephant Butte Irrigation 
District and are included in the comments section of this document.

V. Procedural Requirements

    Comment: The proposed rule will have a financial affect in excess 
of $100 million on irrigation districts. It alters the budgetary 
obligations of all affected irrigation districts by decreasing revenue 
credits. The rule raises legal and policy issues with respect to 
revenue credits and it constitutes a major Federal action since it 
impacts existing repayment and operation and maintenance contracts with 
irrigation districts.
    Response: It is Reclamation's responsibility to make this 
determination based on economic analysis. We did not receive any 
evidence that contradicts our analysis, which shows that the total 
amount of fees and charges we annually collect for uses of Reclamation 
land, facilities, and waterbodies is well under $100 million. 
Additionally, revenues collected for the use of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies must be handled in accordance with all 
statutory, regulatory, and policy requirements. Since such statutes, 
regulations, and policies have all been in place for years, even 
decades, this rule is not raising legal and policy issues.

Changes, Comments, and Responses Related to the Text of the Proposed 
Rule

Subpart A--Purpose, Definitions, and Applicability
    Section 429.1 This section describes the purpose of 43 CFR part 
429.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.2 This section establishes the definitions for terms 
that are used in part 429.
    We made minor editorial changes to this section as compared to the 
previously proposed rule as well as expanding the definition of private 
exclusive recreational or residential use for clarification purposes.
    Comment: Rewrite the definitions for application and Reclamation. 
For application, allow an authorized form provided by responsible water 
user organization; and for Reclamation include in the definition a 
water user organization that has assumed responsibility for the 
operation and maintenance of a project.
    Response: Reclamation can only accept one of the two Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approved application forms listed under 
Sec.  429.10: Form 7-2540 or SF 299. All

[[Page 74328]]

forms collected by a Federal agency which collects information from 10 
or more individuals or entities on an annual basis must be approved by 
OMB and renewed by them on a 3-year basis. This does not preclude 
managing partners and water user organizations from using their own 
forms to facilitate activities for which they are responsible. 
Reclamation is an agency of the Federal government and as such the 
definition cannot be expanded to include a non-Federal entity.
    Comment: The definition for private exclusive recreational or 
residential use should be modified to remove the statement ``which 
create the perception of such exclusion.'' To equate exclusive to 
exclusion is irrational.
    Response: We have removed the subject phrase from the definition of 
private exclusive recreational or residential use.
    Comment: Language should be added which makes it clear that issuing 
authorizations for a particular facility to a particular applicant is 
not the exclusionary conduct that the rule seeks to prohibit.
    Response: We made changes under Sec.  429.4 to clarify which uses 
are not considered private exclusive use.
    Comment: Boat docks should be defined ``as lesser forms of private 
use.'' This terminology is used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 
their shoreline management guidelines.
    Response: Although the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (COE) 
definition for private exclusive use does exclude such uses as boat 
docks and moorings, the definition goes on to state that those uses 
will be included in their shoreline management requirements. The COE 
shoreline management requirements include non-transferability of 
permits for any reason including sale of associated improvements or 
death of permittee and permits are issued for terms of 5 years or less. 
Reclamation has decided to go in a direction that allows for more 
flexibility for both the operators of Reclamation facilities and those 
who hold authorizations for existing private exclusive recreational and 
residential uses.
    Comment: Add a definition for commercial photography to provide for 
the parallel treatment of filming and photography.
    Response: We did not add a definition for commercial photography to 
the rule. Both commercial filming and photography are subject equally 
to Reclamation's requirements and processes as stated under Sec.  
429.3.
    Section 429.3 This section describes the types of uses of and 
activities on Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies that 
typically require a use authorization under part 429.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Comment: Traditional public uses of Reclamation land may be subject 
to the proposed new rule instead of 43 CFR part 423. The terms of Sec.  
429.3(c) and (f) would remove the ambiguity and potential conflict with 
the proposed new Sec.  429.4(a) which exempts individual, non-
commercial uses.
    Response: In fact, many activities on Reclamation land, facilities, 
and waterbodies may be subject to both part 423 and part 429 of this 
chapter. The distinction between these two parts is that part 429 
specifies for which activities use authorizations must be obtained and 
part 423 specifies what conduct by the public is or is not acceptable 
on Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies. Even though an 
activity may be authorized under part 429 of this chapter, use 
authorizations do not condone all possible conduct by the public.
    Section 429.4 This section lists the types of uses of and 
activities on Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies that do not 
require authorization under part 429.
    We made changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule for clarification purposes including the addition of a 
new paragraph (b) which provides examples of the types of buildings and 
structures used by concessionaires or managing partners that are not 
subject to this part.
    Comment: Is written permission needed to boat or swim on 
Reclamation waterbodies?
    Response: No. These activities are listed under Sec.  429.4 as not 
being subject to the requirement and processes established under this 
part. They are, however, subject to part 423 of this chapter which 
relates to public conduct on Reclamation land, facilities, and 
waterbodies.
    Section 429.5 This section addresses who is authorized under part 
429 to issue use authorizations.
    We made changed this section as compared to the previously proposed 
rule to add that a copy of all use authorizations issued by managing 
partners be provided to the local Reclamation office.
    Comment: Reclamation is commended for amending the 2007 proposed 
rule. The changes allow for the efficient and effective relationship 
between Reclamation and water user organizations that have assumed 
contractual responsibility for the operation and maintenance of 
Reclamation projects. Reclamation's efforts in balancing its ultimate 
responsibility for Federal land, with the practical realities of 
operating and managing Reclamation project are appreciated.
    Response: No response required.
    Comment: Do not make any changes to grazing leases or re-route the 
revenues collected for such leases issued by water user organizations.
    Response: Under this section, water user organizations who have 
assumed responsibility for operation and maintenance of Reclamation 
land, facilities, or waterbodies pursuant to a contract with 
Reclamation may issue limited use authorizations. All revenues 
collected for the use of Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies 
must be handled in compliance with all statutory, regulatory, and 
policy requirements.
    Comment: Requiring authorization from a water user organization 
constitutes an improper delegation of federal authority per 43 U.S.C. 
387 which provides the Secretary with the authority to grant leases, 
license, easements, and rights-of-way. It may be proper for the 
Secretary to delegate this authority to Reclamation, but not to a water 
user organization.
    Response: Only water user organization's who are authorized under 
their contract for operation and maintenance of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies may issue limited use authorizations to 
third parties. Additionally, only Reclamation or another Federal agency 
may issue authorizations that convey an interest in Reclamation land, 
facilities, or waterbodies.
    Section 429.6 This section details when water user organizations 
must approve Reclamation's use authorizations.
    We changed this section as compared to the previously proposed 
rule. Section 10 of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 as amended is 
the statutory authority for use authorizations under paragraph (a). Due 
to comments received, we requested a legal review within the Department 
of the Interior of this provision and this paragraph has now been 
revised to track with section 10.
    Section 10 of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 as amended is the 
statutory authority for use authorizations under paragraph (a). This 
paragraph has now been revised to track with Section 10.
    We have added paragraph (c) which addresses the Regional Directors' 
discretionary authority to seek concurrence for all use authorizations 
not addressed in paragraph (a). This was

[[Page 74329]]

formerly addressed in paragraph (b) and limited to use authorizations 
of less than 25 years.
    Comment: Delete the requirement that Reclamation obtain the 
approval of water user organizations for easements and rights-of-way 
for periods in excess of 25 years, and indicate that such a requirement 
is at the discretion of the regional director.
    Response: Section 10 of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 
specifies that Reclamation will grant easements and rights-of-way for 
periods in excess of 25 years only with the written approval of any 
water user organization under contract obligation for repayment to 
Reclamation.
    Comment: Rewrite this section to state that all use authorizations 
for easements and rights-of-way within a project or division are 
subject to the approval of any water user organization under contract 
obligation for repayment, and for those water user organizations who 
have assumed responsibility for operation and maintenance of that 
project or division. This requirement would not apply to any other type 
of authorization.
    Response: Section 10 of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 
specifies that Reclamation will grant easements and rights-of-way for 
periods in excess of 25 years only with the written approval of any 
water user organization under contract obligation for repayment to 
Reclamation. We do, however, provide in the rule that at a minimum all 
affected water user organizations be notified prior to the issuance of 
any use authorization. Additionally, at the discretion of the Regional 
Director, the affected water user organization may be asked to formally 
concur with the issuance of the proposed use authorization.
Subpart B--Proposed Uses Involving Reclamation Easements
    Section 429.7 This section discusses the use of land not owned by 
Reclamation, but where Reclamation holds easements.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.8 This section discusses whether fees are required for 
the use of Reclamation easements.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
Subpart C--Requesting Authorizations To Use Reclamation Land, 
Facilities, and Waterbodies
    Section 429.9 This section explains what you should do before 
filing an application.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Comment: Revise this section to include discussion of a proposed 
use with the water user organization as described in Sec.  429.5.
    Response: In contacting Reclamation, a potential applicant will be 
referred to the appropriate water user organization if that 
organization has the contractual authority to issue use authorizations 
for the intended use. This issue will be more directly addressed in 
revisions to applicable Reclamation Manual Directives and Standards and 
handbooks rather than in this rule. Additionally, when Reclamation is 
responsible for issuing the use authorization, local Reclamation 
offices will continue to coordinate with water user organizations when 
applicable to determine whether a proposed use is compatible with the 
needs and purposes of the project.
    Section 429.10 This section describes what application forms to use 
and how to determine which application form is appropriate to use.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Comment: Revise this section to add a water user organization's 
form authorized by Reclamation.
    Response: Reclamation can only accept one of the two OMB approved 
application forms listed under Sec.  429.10: Form 7-2540 or SF 299. All 
forms used by a Federal agency which collect information from 10 or 
more individuals or entities on an annual basis must be approved by OMB 
and renewed by them on a 3-year basis.
    Section 429.11 Where the use authorization application forms can be 
found is provided in this section.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Comment: Revise this section to include wording that contact 
information for the appropriate water user organization can be obtained 
from any Reclamation office.
    Response: The local Reclamation office will provide water user 
organization contact information when appropriate. This will be 
addressed more directly in revisions to applicable Reclamation Manual 
Directives and Standards and handbooks.
    Section 429.12 The appropriate location for filing an application 
is listed in this section.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Comment: Revise this section to read: ``File your application * * * 
with the Reclamation office or water user organization having 
jurisdiction over the land.* * *''
    Response: Although some water user organizations may have assumed 
responsibility for the operation and maintenance of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies pursuant to a contract with Reclamation, 
Reclamation still maintains jurisdiction over the subject land, 
facilities, and waterbodies. The location for filing an application 
should be coordinated between the local Reclamation office and water 
user organization.
    Section 429.13 This section tells how long the application review 
process will take.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.14 The criteria Reclamation will consider when 
reviewing applications is described in this section.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Comment: This section does not include the best interests of the 
affected project beneficiaries, nor does it address the impacts of not 
receiving revenue credits which would create further financial burdens 
on the water user organizations.
    Response: This rule complies with OMB Circular A-25 which directs 
the recovery of revenues for administrative costs incurred by 
Reclamation in the processing of use applications and for the use of 
Federal lands. Although the responsibility for operation and 
maintenance of Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies may be 
contractually transferred in some instances to a water user 
organization, they are owned by the United States. All revenues 
collected for the use of Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies 
must be handled in accordance with applicable Federal statutes, 
regulations, and policies.
    Section 429.15 This section discusses whether Reclamation is 
required to issue use authorizations.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.

[[Page 74330]]

Subpart D--Application Fees and Administrative Costs
    Section 429.16 The amount of the application fee and when to pay 
the fee is described in this section.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.17 This section explains under what circumstances 
administrative costs will be collected.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.18 This section explains when administrative costs will 
be due and payable.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Comment: Administrative costs should include a reasonable charge 
for project related land, facilities, and waterbodies for the benefit 
of the project beneficiaries.
    Response: OMB Circular A-25 provides our authority to collect 
administrative costs that are incurred by us in processing a use 
application for an authorization to use Reclamation land, facilities, 
or waterbodies. We do not have authority to collect administrative 
costs for any other entity.
    Section 429.19 This section describes what the process is when the 
initial estimate for administrative costs is insufficient.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
published rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.20 This section describes how to request a detailed 
explanation of the administrative costs.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.21 This section describes what occurs if the 
administrative costs are overpaid.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.22 This section discusses whether future administrative 
costs can be charged after a use authorization is issued by 
Reclamation.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
Subpart E--Use Fees
    Comment: This subpart fails to include the best interests of the 
affected project beneficiaries by not charging a reasonable fee for the 
project beneficiaries and not providing those reasonable fees as 
revenue credits to the benefit of the affected project.
    Response: This rule complies with OMB Circular A-25 which directs 
the recovery of revenues for the use of Federal lands. Although the 
responsibility for operation and maintenance of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies may be contractually transferred in some 
instances to a water user organization, they are owned by the United 
States. All revenues collected for the use of Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies must be handled in accordance with 
applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and policies.
    Section 429.23 How Reclamation determines use fees is described in 
this section.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Comment: Increased fees have adverse impacts on cabin owners 
forcing them from their cabins.
    Response: This rule does not set fees for cabins or any other use 
of Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies. Use fees are 
established on a case-by-case basis as determined by a valuation 
process or competitive bidding.
    Comment: This section must be defined more clearly as well as 
accurately.
    Response: The Reclamation Manual Directive and Standard, Real 
Property Appraisal, LND 05-01, which may be found at https://
www.usbr.gov/ outlines in depth the valuation process for determining 
use fees. The alternative method that may be used under this section 
for determining use fees is the competitive bidding process.
    Section 429.24 This section explains when use fees should be paid.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.25 This section describes the length of time allowed to 
both submit a use fee payment and accept the offered use authorization.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
Subpart F--Reductions or Waivers of Application Fees, Administrative 
Costs, and Use Fees
    Section 429.26 This section describes under what conditions 
Reclamation may waive or reduce costs or fees.
    We made minor editorial changes to this section.
    Comment: This section does not take into consideration the affect 
that waiving fees would have on water user organizations. The 
requirement to collect fair market value should be retained.
    Response: Section 6 of OMB Circular A-25 allows for a reduced fee 
or waiver under certain circumstances and we have simply incorporated 
this concept into this rule. As listed under Sec.  429.23, we are 
required to collect a use fee based on a valuation or competitive 
bidding process unless the use fees have been waived by the applicable 
regional director. All revenues collected for the use of Reclamation 
land, facilities, and waterbodies must be handled in accordance with 
applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and policies.
    Comment: Costs and fees associated with obtaining Reclamation's 
approval for an easement, right-of-way, or other authorized use should 
be automatically waived for applicants that are public entities.
    Response: Public entities and others who believe they may be 
eligible for a waiver of some or all fees associated with the use of 
Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies may request such a waiver 
from the applicable Regional Director.
Subpart G--Terms and Conditions of Use Authorizations
    Section 429.27 This section describes the general information that 
is contained in each use authorization.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.28 Terms and conditions that apply to all use 
authorizations from Reclamation are outlined in this section.
    We made changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. Under Sec.  429.28(a)(3) we clarified when Reclamation 
may terminate a use authorization. These now include, but are not 
limited to, events such as a natural disaster or threats to public 
health and safety. We also modified Sec.  429.28(a)(4) by deleting the 
condition that lack of use in a 2-year timeframe may result in the 
termination of a use authorization. We added the condition that failure 
to construct during the timeframe specified in the use authorization 
may constitute a presumption of abandonment and cause for termination.

[[Page 74331]]

    Comment: The proposed rule allows existing docks to stay for now. 
However, it also gives Reclamation unilateral authority to terminate 
dock permits at any future point without public comment.
    Response: We have revised Sec.  429.28 to clarify under what 
conditions an authorization could be terminated without public comment. 
Additionally, Sec.  429.32(a) has been revised to more clearly explain 
the public process that would be required prior to Reclamation making a 
determination that authorizations for existing private exclusive 
recreational and residential use would be terminated.
    Comment: Under the proposed rule, individuals holding valid permits 
who do not construct or use their boat docks for a period of two years 
can lose their permits forever through a presumption of abandonment.
    Response: We have revised Sec.  429.28(a)(4) by removing the 2-year 
timeframe and adding the condition that construction must occur within 
the timeframe specified in the use authorization or the use 
authorization may be terminated.
    Comment: It appears that this document may be in violation of First 
Amendment rights by denying the right to appeal.
    Response: All final determinations made by Reclamation may be 
appealed using the process outlined in subpart I of this rule.
    Section 429.29 This section describes additional terms and 
conditions or requirements that will be included in a use 
authorization.
    We made no changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.30 This section explains whether a use authorization 
can be transferred or assigned to another individual or entity.
    We made changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule to incorporate revisions made regarding the transfer of 
authorizations for existing private exclusive recreational or 
residential uses as described under Sec.  429.32(e).
    Comment: The proposed rule does not recognize homeowners' rights to 
transfer their dock permits should they sell their lakeside homes or 
pass them on to their heirs. Transfer authority is solely at the 
discretion of the local Reclamation office. This right should be 
recognized in the rule. Reclamation authority over transfers should be 
limited to record keeping and permit compliance.
    Response: The conditions for transfer of use authorizations for 
existing private exclusive recreational or residential uses are now 
under 429.32(e). Notification of transfers must be provided to 
Reclamation in advance of the transfer. Holders of use authorizations 
should keep in mind, however, that a use authorization for private 
exclusive recreational or residential use does not vest an interest in 
Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies with the holder of the use 
authorization.
Subpart H--Terms and Conditions of Use Authorizations
    Section 429.31 This section describes what the prohibited uses are 
on Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies.
    We made changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule.
    Section 429.31(b) now reflects that improvements made within the 
terms and conditions of an existing use authorization will not be 
considered a new private exclusive recreational or residential use. 
These improvements may include those necessary to maintain or repair 
the authorized use. Expansions of the authorized use within the terms 
and conditions of the existing authorization may also be allowed. Any 
such expansions should, however, be reviewed by the local Reclamation 
office prior to initiating the activity to ensure that the planned 
change is truly within the terms of the use authorization.
    Additionally, Sec.  429.31(b)(1) has been moved and incorporated 
into the definition of private exclusive recreational and residential 
use under Sec.  429.2 and Sec.  429.31(b)(2) has been moved to Sec.  
429.4(b)
    Comment: Reword Sec.  429.31(b) to state that uses outside an 
already existing permitted area would be prohibited. This would allow 
improvements, expansions, or repairs within the existing footprint of 
an existing authorized use.
    Response: We have revised Sec.  429.31(b) to incorporate the intent 
of this comment. Improvements, expansions, or repairs of the authorized 
use within the terms and conditions of the existing authorization may 
also be allowed. Any such improvements, expansions, or repairs should, 
however, be reviewed by the local Reclamation office prior to 
initiating the activity to ensure that the planned change is truly 
within the terms of the use authorization.
    Comment: Prohibitions against new docks on lakes with limited 
public facilities are inconsistent with both Congressional mandates and 
agency principles. Requiring property owners to use limited public boat 
dock moorings reduces recreational opportunities for the public.
    Response: Under this rule, new public docks are not prohibited. 
When as a result of an appropriate public planning process a need for 
additional public facilities is shown, we will explore opportunities to 
construct needed facilities under existing project authorities or seek 
managing partners willing to construct and maintain such facilities.
    Comment: New landscaping is prohibited under the proposed rule 
while existing authorizations are grandfathered. Since use 
authorizations for landscaping have not as yet been issued by the local 
office, these uses would now be prohibited and subject to civil and 
criminal penalties. Homeowners' efforts to improve the shoreline in 
accordance with the resource management plan should be encouraged.
    Response: New landscaping that falls within the parameters of an 
existing authorization for private exclusive recreational or 
residential use will not be considered new private exclusive 
recreational or residential use as stated under Sec.  429.31(b). 
Applications submitted for a use authorization for landscaping will be 
reviewed and evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the local or regional 
Reclamation office.
    Section 429.32 How Reclamation will address existing uses which are 
otherwise prohibited is discussed in this section.
    The majority of comments received relate to this section of the 
proposed rule. Most of the commenters hold existing use authorizations 
for cabin sites or other recreational or residential uses, including 
boat docks, on Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies.
    In response to comments received and to improve the clarity of this 
section, we have made several changes to this section as follow:
    Paragraph (a) of this section more thoroughly describes the public 
process we will use when determining whether existing private exclusive 
recreational or residential uses remain compatible with public needs or 
project purposes. The minimum timeframe for such reviews has been 
increased from 5 years to 20 years, except for those instances where 
part 21 of this title requires reviews at least every 5 years. In 
addition, clarification was incorporated on how holders of existing use 
authorizations would be notified of opportunities for public 
participation.
    Paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section now address how and 
when

[[Page 74332]]

reviews of compliance with environmental, health and safety, and 
financial requirements will be conducted and how those results will be 
provided to the holder of the use authorization.
    Paragraph (e) of this section was added to address the conditions 
for transferring existing authorizations for private exclusive 
recreational and residential uses.
    Minor editorial changes were made to paragraph (f) (previously 
paragraph (e)) of this section.
    No changes other than re-lettering were made to paragraphs (g), (h) 
and (j) (previously paragraphs (f), (g) and (i)) of this section.
    A clarification was made to paragraph (i) (previously paragraph 
(h)) of this section concerning what use authorizations could not be 
renewed, transferred, etc.
    Comment: The proposed rule provides no rationale for reversing the 
regulations previously proposed. Reclamation is not authorized to 
provide for private exclusive use. The proposed rule would violate 
Reclamation's Congressional mandate to provide for public recreation. 
We strongly object to the change in the proposed rule to allow private 
exclusive use to continue. Please do not privatize our public lands.
    Response: Under this rule existing private exclusive recreational 
and residential uses will be discontinued when, through a public 
process, a determination is made that the needs of the public or of 
Reclamation projects are not being adequately met. We will continue to 
take into consideration the needs of the public in the management of 
these lands, facilities, and waterbodies.
    Comment: The U.S.D.A. Forest Service regulations contain better 
protections for cabin owners and recognition of appropriate time 
periods which are omitted in this section.
    Response: The U.S.D.A. Forest Service and Reclamation are governed 
by different Federal statutes, regulations, and policies that determine 
how both agencies manage cabin sites on Federal lands for which they 
have management responsibilities.
    Comment: The term for compliance reviews should be expanded from 5 
years to 20 years and reviews should be done on a lake-wide basis since 
individual dock compliance will occur at permit renewal.
    Response: This section has been revised to reflect that we will 
conduct reviews for determinations as to compatibility with public 
needs and project purposes at least once every 20 years unless required 
otherwise by part 21 of this title. Compliance reviews for the criteria 
found under Sec.  429.32(b) will be conducted once every 5 years since 
it is not appropriate to review, for example, an area any less 
frequently to determine if there are health and safety concerns.
    Comment: The 90-day notification period to authorization holders 
for correction of identified deficiencies is not adequate in areas 
where weather limitations could impact their ability to bring their use 
into compliance with the requirements.
    Response: Section 429.32(c) allows a minimum of 90 days to be 
provided to make corrections. Local managers will work with 
authorization holders to establish reasonable timeframes for curing 
deficiencies. Additionally, the compliance review reports will be 
provided to the holder of the use authorization by certified mail, 
return receipt requested.
    Comment: Reclamation has no requirement to inform permit holders of 
expiring permits which could result in permanent loss of docks for 
unaware homeowners who miss renewal deadlines. Permit holders should be 
notified at least 90 days prior to permit expiration dates. Reclamation 
offices issuing permits should be given discretionary authority to 
reinstate lapsed permits where lack of notice or other extenuating 
circumstances can be shown.
    Response: Section 429.32(d) has been revised to include written 
notification to the holder of an authorization for existing private 
exclusive recreational or residential use with the results of the 
compliance review that will be completed at least 6 months prior to the 
expiration date of the authorization. The notification will be sent at 
least 90 days prior to the expiration of the authorization and will 
include a reminder that it is time to renew the use authorization.
    Comment: All dock permits should be for a term of 20 years.
    Response: Under Sec.  429.32(f) renewals of authorizations for all 
private exclusive recreational or residential will not exceed 20 year 
terms. The determination as to the appropriate length of the term which 
may be up to 20 years will be made on a case-by-case basis by the 
issuing Reclamation office.
    Comment: Our existing use authorizations for private exclusive 
recreational and residential uses will not be renewed upon expiration.
    Response: We will renew private exclusive recreational and 
residential use authorizations provided that the requirements of this 
final rule continue to be met.
    Section 429.33 This section describes the consequences for using 
Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies without authorization.
    We made changes to this section compared to the previously proposed 
rule. Paragraph (a) of this section was rewritten and is now a new 
paragraph (g) which discusses when legal action under part 423 of this 
chapter may apply.
    Comment: Potential penalties under this proposed rule give 
Reclamation officials the right to hand out jail terms to people 
failing to remove docks for which permits have lapsed or been denied.
    Response: Reclamation officials cannot unilaterally impose jail 
terms for violations. Penalties for unauthorized use of Reclamation 
land, facilities, or waterbodies are established under part 423 of this 
chapter not under this rule. We have added a new paragraph (g) to this 
section to clarify that a violation may be subject to legal action 
including criminal prosecution under part 423 of this chapter.
    Comment: Fines levied can be retroactively assessed to the date of 
infraction. Interest on penalties should accrue from the date an 
individual is notified in writing of any violation.
    Response: We reviewed this issue and determined it is appropriate 
to charge use fees as well as any penalties and interest from the date 
that the unauthorized use commenced. Those that use Reclamation land, 
facilities, or waterbodies without authorization should not be treated 
the same as those who have complied with the requirements. The 
application of interest from the date the unauthorized use commenced 
incorporates this concept.
Subpart I--Decisions and Appeals
    Section 429.34 The decisionmaker for Reclamation's final 
determinations is listed in this section and provides when that 
decision will be effective.
    We made minor editorial changes to this section as compared to the 
previously proposed rule. We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.35 This section explains if and when an appeal can be 
made to a final determination.
    We made changes to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule to clarify that the appeal process applies to final 
determinations and to specify that you can appeal a Regional Director's 
final determination to the Commissioner within 30 days of the

[[Page 74333]]

postmark date of a Regional Director's letter of final determination.
    Comment: The 30-day appeal period should commence on the date of 
receipt of decision.
    Response: We changed this section to state that you can appeal a 
Regional Director's final determination to the Commissioner within 30 
days of the postmark date of a Regional Director's letter of final 
determination.
    Section 429.36 This section describes if and when a Commissioner's 
decision can be appealed. The process for and timeliness of such an 
appeal is also discussed in this section.
    We added paragraph (c) to this section to clarify that the 
Commissioner's decision will take effect upon issuance and remain in 
effect unless a stay is specifically requested and granted by the 
Director, Office of Hearing and Appeals.
    We received no comments on this section.
    Section 429.37 This section discusses what happens to monies owed 
to the United States during an appeal process.
    We made a change to this section as compared to the previously 
proposed rule to clarify that interest does not accrue when a stay has 
been issued at any point in the appeal process.
    We received no comments on this section.

VI. Distribution Table

    The following table indicates each section of the original 1983 
rule, as modified in 2006, and where each was incorporated into the 
proposed rule or not included as the case may be.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Old section                                              New section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
429.1...............................  429.1.
429.2(a)-(n)........................  429.2.
429.3(a)............................  429.23.
429.3(b)............................  429.33(a) and (c).
429.3(c)............................  429.33(a) and (b).
429.4...............................  429.26.
429.5...............................  Removed.
429.6...............................  429.7(b); 429.12; and 429.14.
429.6(a)............................  429.10.
429.6(a)(1)-(3).....................  Removed. Now contained in Application Forms.
429.6(b)............................  429.16; 429.20-429.22; and 429.26.
429.6(c)(1)-(4).....................  429.26.
429.6(d)(1)-(4).....................  429.13(a) and (b).
429.6(e)............................  429.19; 429.22.
429.6(f)............................  429.23-429.25.
429.6(g)............................  Removed. See Preamble.
429.7(a)............................  429.27-429.30.
429.7(b)............................  429.6.
429.7(c)............................  Removed.
429.7(d)............................  429.28(a)(3).
429.7(e)............................  429.28(a)(1).
429.7(f)............................  Removed.
429.8...............................  429.28(a)(2), (3), and (4).
429.9(a)............................  429.28(a)(1).
429.9(b)............................  429.28(b).
429.10(a)...........................  429.34(a) and (b); 429.35(a), (b), and (c).
429.10(b)...........................  429.36(a) and (b).
429.11..............................  Removed.
429.12(a)...........................  429.1; 429.3-429.6.
429.12(b)...........................  429.4(a).
429.12(c)...........................  429.26.
429.12(d)...........................  429.4(g).
429.12(e)...........................  Removed.
429.13..............................  429.1; 429.3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

VII. Procedural Requirements

1. Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order (E.O.) 12866)

    OMB has determined that this rule is not a significant rule and has 
not reviewed this rule under the requirements of E.O. 12866. We have 
evaluated the impacts of this rule as required by E.O. 12866 and have 
determined that it is not a significant regulatory action. The results 
of our evaluation follow:
    (a) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on 
the economy. It would not adversely affect in any material way the 
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, environment, public health or 
safety, or State, local, and tribal governments or communities. The 
original rule covered only Reclamation lands. It was modified in 2006 
to explicitly incorporate uses of Reclamation facilities and 
waterbodies. The proposed rule requires collecting an initial, 
nonrefundable deposit of $100 (referred to as the ``application fee''), 
the recovery of additional administrative costs in excess of the 
initial application fee, and a fee for the use of Reclamation land. It 
should be noted that this rule reduces the initial application fee from 
$200 ($150 refundable under specific circumstances) to a nonrefundable 
$100 application fee. The rule does not change the requirement for full 
cost recovery of additional administrative costs in excess of the $100 
nonrefundable application fee or the requirement to collect the fee for 
use of Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies. Like the current 
rule, this rule provides for waivers or reductions of costs and fees 
under unique circumstances as determined to be appropriate by us in 
compliance with OMB Circular A-25.
    (b) This rule would not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise 
interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. Since this 
rule is specific to Reclamation land, facilities, and waterbodies, any 
impact on another agency would be minimal.

[[Page 74334]]

Nevertheless, nothing in this rule precludes us from cooperating with 
other agencies on proposed actions that may impact or require the use 
of Reclamation's land, facilities, and waterbodies. An example of our 
working with other agencies is this rule's requirement to use Standard 
Form (SF) 299, Application for Transportation and Utility Systems and 
Facilities on Federal Lands, under E.O. 13327. The purpose of E.O. 
13327 is to promote the efficient and economical use of America's real 
property assets. This proposed rule also requires the use of Form 7-
2540, Bureau of Reclamation Right-of-Use Application Form, for all 
other requested uses.
    (c) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, 
grants, user fees, concessions, loan programs, water contracts, 
management agreements, or the rights and obligations of their 
recipients.
    (d) This rule does not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The 
recovery of administrative fees and charging of application and use 
fees are required by the IOAA, OMB Circular A-25, and the current rule.

2. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Department of the Interior (Interior) certifies that this 
document will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial 
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.). This rule does not impose a requirement for small 
businesses to report or keep records on any of the requirements 
contained in this rule. A small business's wish to apply to use 
Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies is strictly voluntary. One 
of the purposes of this rule is to provide small business applicants 
and others with the requirements they must follow when applying for 
such a use. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required 
and, accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance Guide is not required.

3. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    This proposed rule is not a major rule under the Small Business 
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2)). This rule:
    (a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million 
or more. There are no major changes in the costs or fees charged to 
applicants.
    (b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for 
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, local, or tribal 
government agencies, or geographic regions. It is anticipated that this 
rule will not result in significant increases in administrative costs 
or use fees for any one applicant, but it will clarify for the public 
the basis for determining such costs and fees.
    (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of 
United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based 
enterprises. The cost to the private sector requesting use of 
Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies is a small fraction of a 
percent of an individual entity's total cost of doing business. Under 
this rule, such requests are made on a voluntary basis.

4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This proposed rule does not impose an unfunded mandate or a 
requirement to expend monies on the part of State, local, or tribal 
governments or communities, or the private sector of $100 million or 
more annually. This rule does not have a significant or unique effect 
on State, local, or tribal governments or communities, or the private 
sector. Requests from any of these entities to use Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies are strictly voluntary. If a requested use 
is authorized by Reclamation, the recovery of administrative costs and 
the payment of use fees associated with such use are required by law, 
OMB Circular, and regulation. There are provisions to allow a reduction 
or waiver of such costs and fees, at our discretion, when specific 
criteria are met. We are not imposing a duty, requirement, or mandate 
on State, local, or tribal governments or communities, or the private 
sector to request such uses. Thus, a statement containing information 
required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is 
not required.

5. Takings (E.O. 12630 and E.O. 13406)

    Under the criteria in E.O. 12630 and E.O. 13406, this proposed rule 
does not have any implications of takings of property rights. This rule 
sets forth the requirements for applying to use Reclamation land, 
facilities, and waterbodies. It also clarifies the basis for charging 
application and use fees, and for the recovery of administrative costs 
under the requirements of the IOAA and OMB Circular A-25. A Takings 
Implication Assessment is not required.

6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)

    Under the criteria in E.O. 13132, the rule does not have any 
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism 
Assessment. The rule is not associated with, nor will it have 
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between 
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. A 
Federalism Assessment is not required.

7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)

    This rule complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988. 
Specifically, this rule:
    (a) Does not unduly burden the judicial system;
    (b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all 
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be 
written to minimize litigation; and
    (c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all 
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal 
standards.

8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)

    Under the criteria of E.O. 13175, Reclamation has evaluated this 
rule and determined that it would have no substantial effects on 
federally recognized Indian Tribes. This rule does not apply to land 
under the sovereign ownership of federally recognized Indian Tribes.

9. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does require information collection from 10 or more 
applicants and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) is 
required. However, the information collection requirements associated 
with this rule have been previously submitted to OMB for review and 
have received approval under the requirements of the PRA. The SF 299, 
Application for Transportation and Utility Systems and Facilities on 
Federal Lands (used for access across our land, facilities, and 
waterbodies), was authorized by OMB No. 1004-0189, expiring on November 
30, 2008. OMB also has approved the information collection in this rule 
(using the Bureau of Reclamation Right-of-Use Application Form 7-2540) 
and has assigned approval number 1006-0003, expiring on March 31, 2009. 
We estimate the burden associated with this latter information 
collection to be 2 hours per application. We use the information 
provided by applicants to determine the nature of the requested use and 
whether the requested use of our land, facilities, or waterbodies 
interferes with project operations or project security, or may create 
other issues. The information provided on the applications is also used 
to ensure, where appropriate and applicable, the technical and 
financial

[[Page 74335]]

resources of the applicant are sufficient to complete the construction 
of the infrastructure or project.

10. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969

    This rule does not constitute a major Federal action and would not 
have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. 
Therefore, this rule does not require the preparation of an 
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the 
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and its regulations.

11. Information Quality Act

    In developing this rule, there was no need to conduct or use a 
study, experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the 
Information Quality Act (Pub. L. 106-554).

12. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)

    This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition 
in the E.O. 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not required.

13. Clarity of This Regulation

    We are required by E.O. 12866 and 12988, and by the Presidential 
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This 
means each rule we publish must:

--Be logically organized;
--Use the active voice to address readers directly;
--Use clear language rather than jargon;
--Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
--Use lists and tables wherever possible.

List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 429

    Administrative practice and procedures, Public lands, Reclamation, 
Recreation and recreation areas, and Land rights-of-way.

    Dated: November 17, 2008.
Kris D. Polly,
Acting Assistant Secretary--Water and Science.

0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Bureau of Reclamation 
revises 43 CFR part 429 as follows:

PART 429