Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, 73557-73558 [E8-28646]
Download as PDF
73557
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 3, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE TWO
*
*
*
Vessel
Masthead
lights,
distance to
stbd of keel
in meters;
Rule 21(a)
Number
*
USS DALLAS .............................
*
SSN 700 ....
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under
the International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International
Regulations for Preventing Collisions at
Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that
the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
of the Navy has determined that USS
DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (CVN 69) is
a vessel of the Navy which, due to its
special construction and purpose,
cannot comply fully with certain
provisions of the 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a
naval ship. The intended effect of this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 Dec 02, 2008
Jkt 217001
Forward
anchor light,
distance
below flight
dk in meters; § 2(K),
Annex I
*
0.41
Approved: November 19, 2008.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty
and Maritime Law).
Dated: November 25, 2008.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–28647 Filed 12–2–08; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
*
....................
*
Forward
anchor light,
number of;
Rule
30(a)(i)
AFT anchor
light,
distance
below flight
dk in meters; Rule
21(e), Rule
30(a)(ii)
*
....................
*
....................
*
AFT anchor
light,
number of;
Rule
30(a)(ii)
....................
rule is to warn mariners in waters where
72 COLREGS apply.
DATES: This rule is effective December 3,
2008 and is applicable beginning 4
November 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander M. Robb Hyde, JAGC, U.S.
Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law),
Office of the Judge Advocate General,
Department of the Navy, 1322 Patterson
Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy
Yard, DC 20374–5066, telephone
number: 202–685–5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the authority granted in 33 U.S.C.
1605, the Department of the Navy
amends 32 CFR Part 706.
The Secretary of the Navy previously
certified that USS DWIGHT D.
EISENHOWER (CVN 69) is a vessel of
the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully
comply with 72 COLREGS. This
amendment provides notice that the
Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law)
of the Navy, under authority delegated
by the Secretary of the Navy, has
amended that certification to reflect that
certain anchor lights on USS DWIGHT
D. EISENHOWER (CVN 69), previously
certified as not in compliance with 72
COLREGS, now comply with the
applicable 72 COLREGS requirements,
to wit: The two aft anchor lights located
below the flight deck were removed and
replaced by a single new aft anchor light
above the hull and near ship’s fore-aft
centerline, as required by Rules 21(e),
30(a)(i) and 30(a)(ii). The side lights
were also raised closer to compliance.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Side lights,
distance
below flight
dk in
meters;
§ 2(g),
Annex I
Side lights,
distance
forward of
forward
masthead
light in meters; § 3(b),
Annex I
Side lights,
distance
inboard of
ship’s sides
in meters;
§ 3(b),
Annex I
*
....................
*
....................
....................
Moreover, it has been determined, in
accordance with 32 CFR Parts 296 and
701, that publication of this amendment
for public comment prior to adoption is
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to public interest since it is
based on technical findings that the
placement of lights on this vessel in a
manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel’s
ability to perform its military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine Safety, Navigation (Water),
and Vessels.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, amend part 706 of title 32 of
the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
■
PART 706—CERTIFICATIONS AND
EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE
INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR
PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA,
1972
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
Part 706 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
2. Section 706.2 is amended as
follows:
■ A. In Table Two by revising, in
numerical order, the following entry for
USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (CVN
69):
■
§ 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of
the Navy under Executive Order 11964 and
33 U.S.C. 1605.
*
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
*
*
03DER1
*
*
73558
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 3, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE TWO
*
*
Vessel
Number
*
USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER.
*
*
*
*
*
Masthead
lights, distance to
stbd of keel
in meters;
Rule 21(a)
*
CVN–69 .....
*
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 53
RIN 2900–AM26
Assistance to States in Hiring and
Retaining Nurses at State Veterans
Homes
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) hereby establishes a final
rule setting forth a mechanism for States
to obtain payments from VA to assist a
State veterans home in the hiring and
retention of nurses for the purpose of
reducing nursing shortages at the home.
This rule implements provisions of the
Veterans Health Programs Improvement
Act of 2004.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective January 2, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacquelyn Bean, Chief, State Veterans
Home Per Diem Program, at (202) 461–
6771, or Christa M. Hojlo, PhD, Director,
State Veterans Home Clinical and
Survey Oversight, at (202) 461–6779;
Veterans Health Administration (114),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420. (These are not toll-free numbers.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
document published in the Federal
Register (73 FR 19785) on April 11,
yshivers on PROD1PC62 with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 Dec 02, 2008
Jkt 217001
Forward anchor light,
distance
below flight
dk in meters; § 2(K),
Annex I
*
31.0
Approved: November 4, 2008.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty
and Maritime Law).
Dated: November 25, 2008.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–28646 Filed 12–2–08; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
*
....................
*
Forward anchor light,
number of;
Rule
30(a)(i)
AFT anchor
light, distance below
flight dk in
meters;
Rule 21(e),
Rule
30(a)(ii)
*
....................
*
....................
2008, we proposed to establish a new 38
CFR part 53 consisting of regulations
captioned ‘‘PAYMENTS TO STATES
FOR PROGRAMS TO PROMOTE THE
HIRING AND RETENTION OF NURSES
AT STATE VETERANS HOMES’’
(referred to below as the proposed
regulations). This document adopts as a
final rule, with changes discussed
below, those proposed regulations. This
final rule sets forth a mechanism and
criteria for a State to obtain payments
from VA to assist a State Veterans Home
(SVH) in the hiring and retention of
nurses for the purpose of reducing
nursing shortages at that home. The
final rule establishes regulations
concerning provisions in section 201 of
the Veterans Health Programs
Improvement Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108–
422), which are codified at 38 U.S.C.
1744.
We provided a 60-day comment
period that ended June 10, 2008. We
received four submissions containing a
number of comments that are all
discussed below.
Definition of Nurse
The proposed regulations at § 53.02
defined the term ‘‘nurse’’ to include
only those who are bedside care givers
at least a majority of the time.
Consequently, the proposed regulations
would allow payments only to promote
the hiring and retention of those nurses
licensed or certified, as described in the
proposed definition, and who are
bedside care givers at least a majority of
the time. In support of this definition,
the proposed rule noted that the
applicable legislative history (H. Rep.
No. 108–538 at 5 (2004)) indicates that
the statutory provisions were intended
to assist State homes ‘‘in hiring nurses
to care for veterans.’’ Two commenters
asserted that VA has misinterpreted 38
U.S.C. 1744 and its legislative history.
With respect to the statute, the
comments specifically discussed
paragraphs (a) and (b), and the final
sentence of paragraph (c), which states
that when prescribing criteria for
programs to be funded, the Secretary
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
AFT anchor
light, number of; Rule
30(a)(ii)
Side lights,
distance
below flight
dk in meters; § 2(g),
Annex I
*
....................
0.2
*
Side lights,
distance forward of forward masthead light in
meters;
§ 3(b),
Annex I
Side lights,
distance inboard of
ship’s sides
in meters;
§ 3(b),
Annex I
*
....................
....................
shall ‘‘take into consideration the need
for flexibility and innovation.’’ They
asserted that the proposed definition of
nurse should be changed to remove its
restriction to those who are bedside care
givers at least a majority of the time, and
should not generally exclude such
individuals as those acting in the
capacity of an advance practice nurse,
an administrative nurse, or a director of
nursing. We made no changes based on
these comments.
Even if the statute and its legislative
history are viewed as permitting VA to
establish a more expansive definition of
the term ‘‘nurse’’ than we proposed, we
do not agree with the commenters’
argument that the proposed definition is
not a permissible one under the statute.
The provisions of 38 U.S.C. 1744(c) and
(j) authorize VA to establish criteria for
the award of payments and we believe
that VA therefore has authority for the
provisions in the proposed rule that,
through the definition of ‘‘nurse,’’ limit
the nurses for whom VA assistance may
be provided. The greatest need for
nurses is for those who are bedside care
givers at least a majority of the time and
we have determined that we can best
use the available funding for recruiting
and retaining such nurses. In
establishing criteria for programs to be
awarded payments, the need for
flexibility and innovation is not the only
permissible consideration. Our
consideration of the need for flexibility
and innovation has been reflected in the
preambles and text of the proposed rule
and of this final rule.
Credible Evidence
The provisions of proposed
§ 53.11(a)(3) would require, as a
condition of receiving assistance, that
the State applicant document by
credible evidence that an individual
SVH has a nursing shortage. One
commenter raised a number of issues
regarding the submission of such
evidence.
The commenter questioned whether a
State applicant would necessarily have
to provide an application for each
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 3, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73557-73558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28646]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
32 CFR Part 706
Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy is amending its certifications and
exemptions under the International Regulations for Preventing
Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the Deputy
Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime Law) of the
Navy has determined that USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (CVN 69) is a vessel
of the Navy which, due to its special construction and purpose, cannot
comply fully with certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without
interfering with its special function as a naval ship. The intended
effect of this rule is to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS
apply.
DATES: This rule is effective December 3, 2008 and is applicable
beginning 4 November 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander M. Robb Hyde, JAGC, U.S.
Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Admiralty and Maritime
Law), Office of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy,
1322 Patterson Ave., SE., Suite 3000, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-
5066, telephone number: 202-685-5040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority granted in 33
U.S.C. 1605, the Department of the Navy amends 32 CFR Part 706.
The Secretary of the Navy previously certified that USS DWIGHT D.
EISENHOWER (CVN 69) is a vessel of the Navy which, due to its special
construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with 72 COLREGS. This
amendment provides notice that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate
General (Admiralty and Maritime Law) of the Navy, under authority
delegated by the Secretary of the Navy, has amended that certification
to reflect that certain anchor lights on USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (CVN
69), previously certified as not in compliance with 72 COLREGS, now
comply with the applicable 72 COLREGS requirements, to wit: The two aft
anchor lights located below the flight deck were removed and replaced
by a single new aft anchor light above the hull and near ship's fore-
aft centerline, as required by Rules 21(e), 30(a)(i) and 30(a)(ii). The
side lights were also raised closer to compliance.
Moreover, it has been determined, in accordance with 32 CFR Parts
296 and 701, that publication of this amendment for public comment
prior to adoption is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to public
interest since it is based on technical findings that the placement of
lights on this vessel in a manner differently from that prescribed
herein will adversely affect the vessel's ability to perform its
military functions.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 706
Marine Safety, Navigation (Water), and Vessels.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, amend part 706 of title 32
of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 706--CERTIFICATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL
REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA, 1972
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR Part 706 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1605.
0
2. Section 706.2 is amended as follows:
0
A. In Table Two by revising, in numerical order, the following entry
for USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (CVN 69):
Sec. 706.2 Certifications of the Secretary of the Navy under
Executive Order 11964 and 33 U.S.C. 1605.
* * * * *
[[Page 73558]]
Table Two
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forward Side lights,
anchor AFT anchor Side lights, distance Side lights,
Masthead light, Forward light, AFT anchor distance forward of distance
lights, distance anchor distance light, below flight forward inboard of
Vessel Number distance to below flight light, below flight number of; dk in masthead ship's sides
stbd of keel dk in number of; dk in Rule meters; Sec. light in in meters;
in meters; meters; Sec. Rule meters; Rule 30(a)(ii) 2(g), meters; Sec. Sec. 3(b),
Rule 21(a) 2(K), 30(a)(i) 21(e), Rule Annex I 3(b), Annex I
Annex I 30(a)(ii) Annex I
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER....................... CVN-69......................... 31.0 ............ ............ ............ ............ 0.2 ............ ............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Approved: November 4, 2008.
M. Robb Hyde,
Commander, JAGC, U.S. Navy, Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General
(Admiralty and Maritime Law).
Dated: November 25, 2008.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E8-28646 Filed 12-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P