Amendments to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities, 72727-72731 [E8-28455]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(3) For all such compositions in the
repertory of SESAC, $120 annually.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 25, 2008.
James Scott Sledge,
Chief Copyright Royalty Judge.
[FR Doc. E8–28466 Filed 11–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–72–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2004–0083; FRL–8747–1]
RIN 2060–AM71
Amendments to National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace
Steelmaking Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
erowe on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to amend the national emission
standards for electric arc furnace (EAF)
steelmaking facilities that are area
sources of hazardous air pollutants
published on December 28, 2007. The
amendments to the area source
standards for EAF steelmaking facilities
clarify applicability of the opacity limit,
make the performance test requirements
for particulate matter consistent with
requirements in the new source
performance standards for EAF
steelmaking facilities, allow title V test
data to be used to demonstrate
compliance, and revise the definition of
‘‘scrap provider’’ to include EAF
steelmaking facilities that own and
operate a scrap shredder.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 2, 2009 without further notice,
unless EPA receives significant adverse
comment by December 31, 2008. If the
effective date is delayed, timely notice
will be published in the Federal
Register. If EPA receives adverse
comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that some or all of
the amendments in this rule will not
take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2004–0083 by one of the following
methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
• Fax: (202) 566–9744.
• Mail: National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Nov 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
Sources: Electric Arc Furnace
Steelmaking Facilities Docket,
Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Please include a total of two copies.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
Public Reading Room, EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2004–
0083. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the National Emission Standards for
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72727
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area
Sources: Electric Arc Furnace
Steelmaking Facilities Docket, EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the Air
Docket is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Phil Mulrine, Sector Policies and
Programs Division, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (D243–02),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711, telephone number: (919) 541–
5289; fax number: (919) 541–3207; email address: mulrine.phil@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The information presented in this
preamble is organized as follows:
I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
II. Does this action apply to me?
III. Where can I get a copy of this document?
IV. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments to EPA?
V. What are the changes to the area source
NESHAP for EAF steelmaking facilities?
A. Melt Shop Opacity Limit
B. Particulate Matter Performance Test
Requirements
C. Certifying Initial Compliance Based on
Previous Tests
D. Definition of ‘‘Scrap Provider’’
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children from Environmental Health and
Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
EPA is publishing this final rule
without a prior proposed rule because
we view this as a noncontroversial
action and anticipate no significant
adverse comment. These amendments to
the national emission standards for
hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) EAF
steelmaking facilities that are area
sources (40 CFR part 63, subpart
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
72728
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
YYYYY) consist of technical corrections
and clarifications that do not make
material changes to the rule’s
requirements. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposed rule to amend the area source
standards if EPA receives significant
adverse comments on this final rule. We
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. For further information about
commenting on the rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document. If
EPA receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the amendments or certain
Category
NAICS
code1
Industry ........................................................
331111 ....
1 North
II. Does this action apply to me?
The regulated categories and entities
potentially affected by the final rule
include:
Examples of regulated entities
Steel mills with electric arc furnace steelmaking facilities that are area sources.
American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. To determine
whether your facility is regulated by this
action, you should examine the
applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.10680
of subpart YYYYY (National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace
Steelmaking Facilities). If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
either the air permit authority for the
entity or your EPA regional
representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13
of subpart A (General Provisions).
III. Where can I get a copy of this
document?
In addition to being available in the
docket, an electronic copy of this final
action will also be available on the
Worldwide Web (WWW) through the
Technology Transfer Network (TTN).
Following signature, a copy of this final
action will be posted on the TTN’s
policy and guidance page for newly
proposed or promulgated rules at the
following address: https://www.epa.gov/
ttn/oarpg/. The TTN provides
information and technology exchange in
various areas of air pollution control.
erowe on PROD1PC63 with RULES
amendments in this final rule will not
take effect. We would address all
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule.
IV. What should I consider as I prepare
my comments to EPA?
Do not submit information containing
CBI to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Send or
deliver information identified as CBI
only to the following address: Roberto
Morales, OAQPS Document Control
Officer (C404–02), Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711, Attention
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2004–
0083. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI.
For CBI information in a disk or CD–
ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Nov 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI
and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD–ROM the specific
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment
that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
V. What are the changes to the area
source NESHAP for EAF steelmaking
facilities?
On December 28, 2007 (72 FR 74088),
we issued the NESHAP for Area
Sources: Electric Arc Furnace
Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR part 63,
subpart YYYYY). The final rule
establishes air emission control
requirements for new and existing
facilities that are area sources of
hazardous air pollutants. The final
standards include emission limits for
particulate matter (PM)(a surrogate for
specific metal hazardous air pollutants)
reflecting performance of generally
available control technology (GACT),
and pollution prevention standards for
the control of mercury emissions
reflecting performance of the maximum
achievable control technology.
A. Melt Shop Opacity Limit
This final rule makes a technical
clarification to the melt house opacity
limit in paragraph (b)(2) of 40 CFR
63.10686 (What are the requirements for
electric arc furnaces and argon-oxygen
decarburization vessels?). The
promulgated rule prohibits the
discharge from an EAF or argon-oxygen
decarburization (AOD) vessel of any
gases which ‘‘exit from a melt shop and,
due solely (emphasis added) to the
operations of any affected EAF(s) or
AOD vessel(s), exhibit 6 percent opacity
or greater.’’ This final rule amends that
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
language by removing the word ‘‘solely’’
from the text of the emissions limit. We
are making this change because, in a few
cases, fugitive emissions from other
sources may be unavoidably
commingled with the emissions from
EAF(s) and AOD vessel(s). In those
cases, the only practical way to
determine compliance with the opacity
limit is to observe the opacity of the
combined emissions. On the other hand,
if intermittent emissions from another
source occasionally commingle with the
fugitive emissions from the affected
EAF(s) or AOD vessel(s) (such as
emissions from point or fugitive sources
that operate intermittently), the opacity
determination must be made when the
other sources are not interfering with
the observations. The owner or operator
has an incentive to make opacity
observations when the emissions are not
commingled because the additional
emissions would result in higher
opacity readings.
We are making a similar change to
paragraph (d)(2) of 40 CFR 63.10686
(What are the requirements for electric
arc furnaces and argon-oxygen
decarburization vessels?), which
establishes requirements for
demonstrating initial compliance by
means of an opacity performance test. In
the promulgated rule, the first sentence
of paragraph (d)(2) specifies the test
methods to be used and the second
sentence pertains to combined
emissions from sources not subject to
subpart YYYYY. The second sentence of
paragraph (d)(2) states that ‘‘When
emissions from any EAF or AOD vessel
are combined with emissions from
emission sources not subject to this
subpart, you must demonstrate
compliance with the melt shop opacity
limit based only (emphasis added) on
emissions from the emission sources
subject to this subpart.’’ This final rule
removes the word ‘‘only’’ from the
second sentence. We are making this
correction for the same reasons just
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
discussed for removing the word
‘‘solely.’’
erowe on PROD1PC63 with RULES
B. Particulate Matter Performance Test
Requirements
Paragraph (d) of 40 CFR 63.10686
(What are the requirements for electric
arc furnaces and argon-oxygen
decarburization vessels?) establishes
requirements for demonstrating initial
compliance by means of a PM
performance test. Paragraph (d)(1)(v) of
this section specifies the test method to
be used, the number of test runs that
comprise a test, and the sampling time
for each test run. The promulgated rule
requires the facility to sample EAFs
only when metal is being melted and
refined and to sample AOD vessels only
when the operation(s) are being
conducted. This final rule changes the
EAF requirements to require either that:
(1) The sampling time and volume for
each run meet the requirement in 40
CFR 60.275a (the new source
performance standard (NSPS)), or (2)
each run consist of at least one heat
cycle (i.e., a test run must include
charging, melting and tapping
operations). This change reflects EPA’s
actual intent in promulgating the
December 2007 rule. Our intent there
was to be consistent with the NSPS for
EAFs and to require that sampling be
performed over the entire heat cycle, not
just during melting. See 72 FR 53826
where we explained that the NSPS PM
limit was GACT, so that one could
reasonably infer that the emission limit
would be implemented as required in
the NSPS. If the rule is left uncorrected,
sampling would not have to be
performed during charging and tapping,
both of which generate emissions;
consequently, sampling only when
melting would not be representative of
the complete EAF production cycle.
Paragraph (d)(4) of 40 CFR 63.10686
states the Administrator must approve
procedures that will be used to
determine compliance when emissions
are combined with those from facilities
not subject to this subpart. We are
clarifying that these and other sitespecific factors for a few facilities with
a complex configuration of facilities
controlled by a common emission
control system must receive the
Administrator’s approval of procedures
to determine compliance, including
cases in which emissions are combined
from multiple facilities subject to this
subpart and when combined from
multiple facilities that include both
those subject and not subject to the
subpart.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Nov 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
C. Certifying Initial Compliance Based
on Previous Tests
Paragraph (d)(6) of 40 CFR 63.10686
(What are the requirements for electric
arc furnaces and argon-oxygen
decarburization vessels?) allows the
owner or operator to use a previous
performance test for an emissions
source to demonstrate initial
compliance for that emissions source
provided the tests meet the rule’s
requirements: (1) The previous test must
have been conducted within 5 years of
the compliance date of the current rule
using the procedures in paragraphs
(d)(1) and (2) of § 63.10686, (2) the
previous test was for that facility, and
(3) the previous test was representative
of current or anticipated operating
processes and conditions. The rule also
includes provisions in paragraph (d)(2)
for conducting a new test if the
permitting authority finds that the
previous test is unacceptable.
This final rule makes three changes to
the provisions governing the use of a
previous performance test as the basis
for certifying initial compliance. The
first change allows the use of a previous
test conducted for compliance
certification according to the facility’s
title V permit if the test was conducted
within 5 years of the compliance date
for the current rule. This change is
consistent with our intent to allow the
use of a valid previous performance test,
such as a test conducted for compliance
certification in the facility’s title V
permit, if the test was conducted within
5 years of the compliance date. The
second change is the addition of a
provision which states that, if results of
a previous performance test are utilized,
the previous performance tests for PM
emissions and melt shop opacity are not
required to have been conducted
simultaneously. We are making this
change to prevent the unnecessary
burden of requiring a new PM
performance test simply because opacity
observations were not made during the
previous PM performance test. The
opacity of fugitive emissions and the
PM emission control performance can
be measured separately to determine
compliance. The third change is the
addition of new paragraph (d)(7) which
allows use of the baseline parametric
monitoring information collected during
a prior performance test to meet the
requirements in 40 CFR 60.275a(f) if the
information was collected under
conditions that are representative of
current or anticipated operating
conditions. Documentation of
representative conditions would be
provided in the test report for the prior
performance test and in company
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72729
records of the EAF steel production rate
during the test. This clarification also
reduces the unnecessary burden of
requiring a new performance test just to
collect operating data to establish
baseline parameters (e.g., fan motor
amperes or volumetric flow rate) when
these parameters have already been
established during previous valid
performance tests.
D. Definition of ‘‘Scrap Provider’’
Section 63.10692 of the current rule
(What definitions apply to this subpart?)
defines a ‘‘scrap provider’’ (a term used
in the pollution prevention standards
for mercury) as ‘‘the person (including
a broker) who contracts directly with a
steel mill to provide scrap that contains
motor vehicle scrap. Scrap processors
such as shredder operators or vehicle
dismantlers that do not sell scrap
directly to a steel mill are not scrap
providers.’’ This final rule adds a
sentence to include within the
definition EAF steel making facilities
that own and operate a scrap shredder.
Under this final rule, a scrap provider
is:
* * * the person (including a broker) who
contracts directly with a steel mill to provide
scrap that contains motor vehicle scrap. The
owner or operator of an EAF steelmaking
facility that also owns and operates a scrap
shredder is a scrap provider for motor vehicle
scrap that is processed in that shredder and
supplied to the EAF steelmaking facility.
Scrap processors such as shredder operators
or vehicle dismantlers that do not sell scrap
directly to a steel mill are not scrap
providers.
This change is necessary because the
previous definition did not address the
possibility that EAF steelmaking
facilities that operate their own onsite
scrap shredders also can be scrap
providers. There are a few instances
where this occurs.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and is therefore not
subject to review under the Executive
Order.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden. These
final amendments clarify applicability
of the opacity limit, make the
performance test requirements for
particulate matter consistent with
requirements in the new source
performance standards for electric arc
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
72730
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
furnace steelmaking facilities, allow title
V test data to be used to demonstrate
compliance, and revise the definition of
‘‘scrap provider’’ to include electric arc
furnace steelmaking facilities that own
and operate a scrap shredder. No new
burden is associated with these
requirements because the burden was
included in the approved information
request (ICR) for the existing rule.
However, the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has previously approved
the information collection requirements
contained in the existing regulations (40
CFR part 63 subpart YYYYY) under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has
assigned OMB control number 2060–
0608. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed
in 40 CFR part 9.
erowe on PROD1PC63 with RULES
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small not-for-profit enterprises, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
For the purposes of assessing the
impacts of this final rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A
small business that meets the Small
Business Administration size standards
for small businesses at 13 CFR 121.201
(whose parent company has fewer than
1,000 employees for NAICS code
331111); (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district, or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of this final rule on small
entities, I certify that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
We have determined that the nine small
entities in this area source category will
not incur any adverse impacts because
this action makes only technical
corrections and clarifications that
increase flexibility and does not create
any new requirements or burdens. No
costs are associated with these
amendments to the NESHAP.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Nov 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538 for State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. The
action imposes no enforceable duty on
any State, local or tribal governments or
the private sector. The term
‘‘enforceable duty’’ does not include
duties and conditions in voluntary
Federal contracts for goods and services.
Therefore, this action is not subject to
the requirements of sections 202 or 205
of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. The
technical corrections and clarifications
made through this action contain no
requirements that apply to such
governments, impose no obligations
upon them, and will not result in any
expenditures by them or any
disproportionate impacts on them.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ are
defined in the Executive Order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’
This final rule does not have
federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. The final rule
makes certain technical corrections and
clarifications to the NESHAP for EAF
steelmaking area sources. These final
corrections and clarifications do not
impose requirements on State and local
governments. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to the final rule.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This final action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000). This final rule makes certain
technical corrections and clarifications
to the NESHAP for EAF steelmaking
area sources. These final corrections and
clarifications do not impose
requirements on tribal governments.
They also have no direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying to those regulatory actions that
concern health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5–
501 of the Executive Order has the
potential to influence the regulation.
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it makes technical
corrections and clarifications to the area
source NESHAP for EAF steelmaking
facilities which is based solely on
technology performance.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
I. National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104–
113, section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS) in its regulatory
activities, unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. The VCS are
technical standards (e.g., materials
specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that
are developed or adopted by VCS
bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to
provide Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, explanations
when the Agency does not use available
and applicable VCS.
This final rule does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, EPA did
not consider the use of any VCS.
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 231 / Monday, December 1, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
PART 63—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final
rule will not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it does
not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the
environment. The technical corrections
and clarifications in this final rule do
not change the level of control required
by the NESHAP.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing these final rule
amendments and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the final
rule amendments in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This final rule will be effective
on March 2, 2009.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
erowe on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Reporting and
Recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 24, 2008.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Nov 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart YYYYY—[Amended]
2. Section 63.10686 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (b)(2);
b. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(v);
c. Revising the second sentence in
paragraph (d)(2);
■ d. Revising paragraph (d)(4);
■ e. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
■ f. Adding paragraph (d)(7) to read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
§ 63.10686 What are the requirements for
electric arc furnaces and argon-oxygen
decarburization vessels?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Exit from a melt shop and, due to
the operations of any affected EAF(s) or
AOD vessel(s), exhibit 6 percent opacity
or greater.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) Method 5 or 5D of appendix A–3
of 40 CFR part 60 to determine the PM
concentration. Three valid test runs are
needed to comprise a PM performance
test. For EAF, you must either meet the
requirements in 40 CFR 60.275a for the
sampling time and volume for each run,
or each run must consist of at least one
heat cycle as defined in 40 CFR 60.271a
(i.e., a test run must include charging,
melting and tapping operations). For
AOD vessels, sample only during the
heat cycle.
(2) * * * When emissions from any
EAF or AOD vessel are combined with
emissions from emission sources not
subject to this subpart, you must
demonstrate compliance with the melt
shop opacity limit based on emissions
from the emission sources subject to this
subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) You must notify and receive
approval from the Administrator for
procedures that will be used to
determine compliance for an EAF or
AOD vessel when emissions are
combined with those from facilities not
subject to this subpart, combined with
those from multiple facilities subject to
this subpart, or both.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) If you own or operate an existing
affected source that is subject to the
emissions limits in paragraph (b) or (c)
of this section, you may certify initial
compliance with the applicable
emission limit for one or more
emissions sources based on the results
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72731
of a previous performance test for that
emissions source in lieu of the
requirement for an initial performance
test provided that the test(s) were
conducted within 5 years of the
compliance date; the test(s) were
conducted using the methods and
procedures specified in paragraph (d)(1)
or (2) of this section or were conducted
as specified for compliance certification
testing in the facility’s title V permit; the
test(s) were for the affected facility; and
the test(s) were representative of current
or anticipated operating processes and
conditions. The previous performance
tests for PM emissions and melt shop
opacity are not required to have been
conducted simultaneously. Should the
permitting authority deem the prior test
data unacceptable to demonstrate
compliance with an applicable
emissions limit, the owner or operator
must conduct an initial performance test
within 180 days of the compliance date
or within 90 days of receipt of the
notification of disapproval of the prior
test, whichever is later.
(7) You may use information collected
during a prior performance test to meet
the parametric monitoring requirements
in 40 CFR 60.275a(f) if the information
was collected under conditions that are
representative of current or anticipated
operating conditions.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 63.10692 is amended by
revising the definition of ‘‘Scrap
provider’’ to read as follows:
§ 63.10692
subpart?
What definitions apply to this
*
*
*
*
*
Scrap provider means the person
(including a broker) who contracts
directly with a steel mill to provide
scrap that contains motor vehicle scrap.
The owner or operator of an EAF
steelmaking facility that also owns and
operates a scrap shredder is a scrap
provider for motor vehicle scrap that is
processed in that shredder and supplied
to the EAF steelmaking facility. Scrap
processors such as shredder operators or
vehicle dismantlers that do not sell
scrap directly to a steel mill are not
scrap providers.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–28455 Filed 11–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 231 (Monday, December 1, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72727-72731]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28455]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0083; FRL-8747-1]
RIN 2060-AM71
Amendments to National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking
Facilities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to amend the national
emission standards for electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking
facilities that are area sources of hazardous air pollutants published
on December 28, 2007. The amendments to the area source standards for
EAF steelmaking facilities clarify applicability of the opacity limit,
make the performance test requirements for particulate matter
consistent with requirements in the new source performance standards
for EAF steelmaking facilities, allow title V test data to be used to
demonstrate compliance, and revise the definition of ``scrap provider''
to include EAF steelmaking facilities that own and operate a scrap
shredder.
DATES: This final rule is effective on March 2, 2009 without further
notice, unless EPA receives significant adverse comment by December 31,
2008. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published
in the Federal Register. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that some or all of the amendments in this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2004-0083 by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov.
Fax: (202) 566-9744.
Mail: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking
Facilities Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a
total of two copies.
Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2004-0083. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Area
Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities Docket, EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air
Docket is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Phil Mulrine, Sector Policies and
Programs Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (D243-
02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711, telephone number: (919) 541-5289; fax number: (919)
541-3207; e-mail address: mulrine.phil@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The information presented in this preamble is organized as follows:
I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
II. Does this action apply to me?
III. Where can I get a copy of this document?
IV. What should I consider as I prepare my comments to EPA?
V. What are the changes to the area source NESHAP for EAF
steelmaking facilities?
A. Melt Shop Opacity Limit
B. Particulate Matter Performance Test Requirements
C. Certifying Initial Compliance Based on Previous Tests
D. Definition of ``Scrap Provider''
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
K. Congressional Review Act
I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
EPA is publishing this final rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no
significant adverse comment. These amendments to the national emission
standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) EAF steelmaking
facilities that are area sources (40 CFR part 63, subpart
[[Page 72728]]
YYYYY) consist of technical corrections and clarifications that do not
make material changes to the rule's requirements. However, in the
``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we are publishing
a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to amend the
area source standards if EPA receives significant adverse comments on
this final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
For further information about commenting on the rule, see the ADDRESSES
section of this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that the amendments or certain amendments in this final rule
will not take effect. We would address all comments in any subsequent
final rule based on the proposed rule.
II. Does this action apply to me?
The regulated categories and entities potentially affected by the
final rule include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of regulated
Category NAICS code\1\ entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry....................... 331111......... Steel mills with
electric arc furnace
steelmaking
facilities that are
area sources.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action,
you should examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR 63.10680 of
subpart YYYYY (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities). If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult either the air permit authority for the
entity or your EPA regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13 of
subpart A (General Provisions).
III. Where can I get a copy of this document?
In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of
this final action will also be available on the Worldwide Web (WWW)
through the Technology Transfer Network (TTN). Following signature, a
copy of this final action will be posted on the TTN's policy and
guidance page for newly proposed or promulgated rules at the following
address: https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. The TTN provides information
and technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control.
IV. What should I consider as I prepare my comments to EPA?
Do not submit information containing CBI to EPA through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Send or deliver information identified
as CBI only to the following address: Roberto Morales, OAQPS Document
Control Officer (C404-02), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina 27711, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0083.
Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be
CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark
the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify
electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment
that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that
does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part
2.
V. What are the changes to the area source NESHAP for EAF steelmaking
facilities?
On December 28, 2007 (72 FR 74088), we issued the NESHAP for Area
Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR part 63,
subpart YYYYY). The final rule establishes air emission control
requirements for new and existing facilities that are area sources of
hazardous air pollutants. The final standards include emission limits
for particulate matter (PM)(a surrogate for specific metal hazardous
air pollutants) reflecting performance of generally available control
technology (GACT), and pollution prevention standards for the control
of mercury emissions reflecting performance of the maximum achievable
control technology.
A. Melt Shop Opacity Limit
This final rule makes a technical clarification to the melt house
opacity limit in paragraph (b)(2) of 40 CFR 63.10686 (What are the
requirements for electric arc furnaces and argon-oxygen decarburization
vessels?). The promulgated rule prohibits the discharge from an EAF or
argon-oxygen decarburization (AOD) vessel of any gases which ``exit
from a melt shop and, due solely (emphasis added) to the operations of
any affected EAF(s) or AOD vessel(s), exhibit 6 percent opacity or
greater.'' This final rule amends that language by removing the word
``solely'' from the text of the emissions limit. We are making this
change because, in a few cases, fugitive emissions from other sources
may be unavoidably commingled with the emissions from EAF(s) and AOD
vessel(s). In those cases, the only practical way to determine
compliance with the opacity limit is to observe the opacity of the
combined emissions. On the other hand, if intermittent emissions from
another source occasionally commingle with the fugitive emissions from
the affected EAF(s) or AOD vessel(s) (such as emissions from point or
fugitive sources that operate intermittently), the opacity
determination must be made when the other sources are not interfering
with the observations. The owner or operator has an incentive to make
opacity observations when the emissions are not commingled because the
additional emissions would result in higher opacity readings.
We are making a similar change to paragraph (d)(2) of 40 CFR
63.10686 (What are the requirements for electric arc furnaces and
argon-oxygen decarburization vessels?), which establishes requirements
for demonstrating initial compliance by means of an opacity performance
test. In the promulgated rule, the first sentence of paragraph (d)(2)
specifies the test methods to be used and the second sentence pertains
to combined emissions from sources not subject to subpart YYYYY. The
second sentence of paragraph (d)(2) states that ``When emissions from
any EAF or AOD vessel are combined with emissions from emission sources
not subject to this subpart, you must demonstrate compliance with the
melt shop opacity limit based only (emphasis added) on emissions from
the emission sources subject to this subpart.'' This final rule removes
the word ``only'' from the second sentence. We are making this
correction for the same reasons just
[[Page 72729]]
discussed for removing the word ``solely.''
B. Particulate Matter Performance Test Requirements
Paragraph (d) of 40 CFR 63.10686 (What are the requirements for
electric arc furnaces and argon-oxygen decarburization vessels?)
establishes requirements for demonstrating initial compliance by means
of a PM performance test. Paragraph (d)(1)(v) of this section specifies
the test method to be used, the number of test runs that comprise a
test, and the sampling time for each test run. The promulgated rule
requires the facility to sample EAFs only when metal is being melted
and refined and to sample AOD vessels only when the operation(s) are
being conducted. This final rule changes the EAF requirements to
require either that: (1) The sampling time and volume for each run meet
the requirement in 40 CFR 60.275a (the new source performance standard
(NSPS)), or (2) each run consist of at least one heat cycle (i.e., a
test run must include charging, melting and tapping operations). This
change reflects EPA's actual intent in promulgating the December 2007
rule. Our intent there was to be consistent with the NSPS for EAFs and
to require that sampling be performed over the entire heat cycle, not
just during melting. See 72 FR 53826 where we explained that the NSPS
PM limit was GACT, so that one could reasonably infer that the emission
limit would be implemented as required in the NSPS. If the rule is left
uncorrected, sampling would not have to be performed during charging
and tapping, both of which generate emissions; consequently, sampling
only when melting would not be representative of the complete EAF
production cycle.
Paragraph (d)(4) of 40 CFR 63.10686 states the Administrator must
approve procedures that will be used to determine compliance when
emissions are combined with those from facilities not subject to this
subpart. We are clarifying that these and other site-specific factors
for a few facilities with a complex configuration of facilities
controlled by a common emission control system must receive the
Administrator's approval of procedures to determine compliance,
including cases in which emissions are combined from multiple
facilities subject to this subpart and when combined from multiple
facilities that include both those subject and not subject to the
subpart.
C. Certifying Initial Compliance Based on Previous Tests
Paragraph (d)(6) of 40 CFR 63.10686 (What are the requirements for
electric arc furnaces and argon-oxygen decarburization vessels?) allows
the owner or operator to use a previous performance test for an
emissions source to demonstrate initial compliance for that emissions
source provided the tests meet the rule's requirements: (1) The
previous test must have been conducted within 5 years of the compliance
date of the current rule using the procedures in paragraphs (d)(1) and
(2) of Sec. 63.10686, (2) the previous test was for that facility, and
(3) the previous test was representative of current or anticipated
operating processes and conditions. The rule also includes provisions
in paragraph (d)(2) for conducting a new test if the permitting
authority finds that the previous test is unacceptable.
This final rule makes three changes to the provisions governing the
use of a previous performance test as the basis for certifying initial
compliance. The first change allows the use of a previous test
conducted for compliance certification according to the facility's
title V permit if the test was conducted within 5 years of the
compliance date for the current rule. This change is consistent with
our intent to allow the use of a valid previous performance test, such
as a test conducted for compliance certification in the facility's
title V permit, if the test was conducted within 5 years of the
compliance date. The second change is the addition of a provision which
states that, if results of a previous performance test are utilized,
the previous performance tests for PM emissions and melt shop opacity
are not required to have been conducted simultaneously. We are making
this change to prevent the unnecessary burden of requiring a new PM
performance test simply because opacity observations were not made
during the previous PM performance test. The opacity of fugitive
emissions and the PM emission control performance can be measured
separately to determine compliance. The third change is the addition of
new paragraph (d)(7) which allows use of the baseline parametric
monitoring information collected during a prior performance test to
meet the requirements in 40 CFR 60.275a(f) if the information was
collected under conditions that are representative of current or
anticipated operating conditions. Documentation of representative
conditions would be provided in the test report for the prior
performance test and in company records of the EAF steel production
rate during the test. This clarification also reduces the unnecessary
burden of requiring a new performance test just to collect operating
data to establish baseline parameters (e.g., fan motor amperes or
volumetric flow rate) when these parameters have already been
established during previous valid performance tests.
D. Definition of ``Scrap Provider''
Section 63.10692 of the current rule (What definitions apply to
this subpart?) defines a ``scrap provider'' (a term used in the
pollution prevention standards for mercury) as ``the person (including
a broker) who contracts directly with a steel mill to provide scrap
that contains motor vehicle scrap. Scrap processors such as shredder
operators or vehicle dismantlers that do not sell scrap directly to a
steel mill are not scrap providers.'' This final rule adds a sentence
to include within the definition EAF steel making facilities that own
and operate a scrap shredder. Under this final rule, a scrap provider
is:
* * * the person (including a broker) who contracts directly
with a steel mill to provide scrap that contains motor vehicle
scrap. The owner or operator of an EAF steelmaking facility that
also owns and operates a scrap shredder is a scrap provider for
motor vehicle scrap that is processed in that shredder and supplied
to the EAF steelmaking facility. Scrap processors such as shredder
operators or vehicle dismantlers that do not sell scrap directly to
a steel mill are not scrap providers.
This change is necessary because the previous definition did not
address the possibility that EAF steelmaking facilities that operate
their own onsite scrap shredders also can be scrap providers. There are
a few instances where this occurs.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under the Executive Order.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new information collection burden.
These final amendments clarify applicability of the opacity limit, make
the performance test requirements for particulate matter consistent
with requirements in the new source performance standards for electric
arc
[[Page 72730]]
furnace steelmaking facilities, allow title V test data to be used to
demonstrate compliance, and revise the definition of ``scrap provider''
to include electric arc furnace steelmaking facilities that own and
operate a scrap shredder. No new burden is associated with these
requirements because the burden was included in the approved
information request (ICR) for the existing rule. However, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has previously approved the information
collection requirements contained in the existing regulations (40 CFR
part 63 subpart YYYYY) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control number 2060-
0608. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are
listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires an agency to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure
Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-
profit enterprises, and small governmental jurisdictions.
For the purposes of assessing the impacts of this final rule on
small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business that
meets the Small Business Administration size standards for small
businesses at 13 CFR 121.201 (whose parent company has fewer than 1,000
employees for NAICS code 331111); (2) a small governmental jurisdiction
that is a government of a city, county, town, school district, or
special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of this final rule on small
entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. We have
determined that the nine small entities in this area source category
will not incur any adverse impacts because this action makes only
technical corrections and clarifications that increase flexibility and
does not create any new requirements or burdens. No costs are
associated with these amendments to the NESHAP.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531-1538 for State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any State, local or
tribal governments or the private sector. The term ``enforceable duty''
does not include duties and conditions in voluntary Federal contracts
for goods and services. Therefore, this action is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203
of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The technical
corrections and clarifications made through this action contain no
requirements that apply to such governments, impose no obligations upon
them, and will not result in any expenditures by them or any
disproportionate impacts on them.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have
federalism implications'' are defined in the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government.''
This final rule does not have federalism implications. It will not
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132. The final rule makes certain
technical corrections and clarifications to the NESHAP for EAF
steelmaking area sources. These final corrections and clarifications do
not impose requirements on State and local governments. Thus, Executive
Order 13132 does not apply to the final rule.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This final action does not have tribal implications, as specified
in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). This final
rule makes certain technical corrections and clarifications to the
NESHAP for EAF steelmaking area sources. These final corrections and
clarifications do not impose requirements on tribal governments. They
also have no direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of the
Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it makes
technical corrections and clarifications to the area source NESHAP for
EAF steelmaking facilities which is based solely on technology
performance.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104-113, section 12(d), 15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its
regulatory activities, unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. The VCS are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
VCS bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through the
Office of Management and Budget, explanations when the Agency does not
use available and applicable VCS.
This final rule does not involve technical standards. Therefore,
EPA did not consider the use of any VCS.
[[Page 72731]]
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. The technical corrections and clarifications in this final
rule do not change the level of control required by the NESHAP.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing these final
rule amendments and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the
U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the final rule amendments in the
Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after
it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This final rule will be effective
on March 2, 2009.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 24, 2008.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 63 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 63--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart YYYYY--[Amended]
0
2. Section 63.10686 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(2);
0
b. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(v);
0
c. Revising the second sentence in paragraph (d)(2);
0
d. Revising paragraph (d)(4);
0
e. Revising paragraph (d)(6); and
0
f. Adding paragraph (d)(7) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.10686 What are the requirements for electric arc furnaces and
argon-oxygen decarburization vessels?
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Exit from a melt shop and, due to the operations of any
affected EAF(s) or AOD vessel(s), exhibit 6 percent opacity or greater.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) Method 5 or 5D of appendix A-3 of 40 CFR part 60 to determine
the PM concentration. Three valid test runs are needed to comprise a PM
performance test. For EAF, you must either meet the requirements in 40
CFR 60.275a for the sampling time and volume for each run, or each run
must consist of at least one heat cycle as defined in 40 CFR 60.271a
(i.e., a test run must include charging, melting and tapping
operations). For AOD vessels, sample only during the heat cycle.
(2) * * * When emissions from any EAF or AOD vessel are combined
with emissions from emission sources not subject to this subpart, you
must demonstrate compliance with the melt shop opacity limit based on
emissions from the emission sources subject to this subpart.
* * * * *
(4) You must notify and receive approval from the Administrator for
procedures that will be used to determine compliance for an EAF or AOD
vessel when emissions are combined with those from facilities not
subject to this subpart, combined with those from multiple facilities
subject to this subpart, or both.
* * * * *
(6) If you own or operate an existing affected source that is
subject to the emissions limits in paragraph (b) or (c) of this
section, you may certify initial compliance with the applicable
emission limit for one or more emissions sources based on the results
of a previous performance test for that emissions source in lieu of the
requirement for an initial performance test provided that the test(s)
were conducted within 5 years of the compliance date; the test(s) were
conducted using the methods and procedures specified in paragraph
(d)(1) or (2) of this section or were conducted as specified for
compliance certification testing in the facility's title V permit; the
test(s) were for the affected facility; and the test(s) were
representative of current or anticipated operating processes and
conditions. The previous performance tests for PM emissions and melt
shop opacity are not required to have been conducted simultaneously.
Should the permitting authority deem the prior test data unacceptable
to demonstrate compliance with an applicable emissions limit, the owner
or operator must conduct an initial performance test within 180 days of
the compliance date or within 90 days of receipt of the notification of
disapproval of the prior test, whichever is later.
(7) You may use information collected during a prior performance
test to meet the parametric monitoring requirements in 40 CFR
60.275a(f) if the information was collected under conditions that are
representative of current or anticipated operating conditions.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 63.10692 is amended by revising the definition of ``Scrap
provider'' to read as follows:
Sec. 63.10692 What definitions apply to this subpart?
* * * * *
Scrap provider means the person (including a broker) who contracts
directly with a steel mill to provide scrap that contains motor vehicle
scrap. The owner or operator of an EAF steelmaking facility that also
owns and operates a scrap shredder is a scrap provider for motor
vehicle scrap that is processed in that shredder and supplied to the
EAF steelmaking facility. Scrap processors such as shredder operators
or vehicle dismantlers that do not sell scrap directly to a steel mill
are not scrap providers.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-28455 Filed 11-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P