Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model BH.125 Series 600A Airplanes and Model HS.125 Series 700A Airplanes Modified in Accordance With Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA2271SW, 71959-71961 [E8-28168]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
McDonnell Douglas DC–10 Service
Bulletin —
Revision—
DC10–53–109 .................................
DC10–53–111 .................................
Dated—
6
5
For airplanes with—
July 10, 2008 ....
March 19, 2008
71959
Extended wing-to-fuselage fillets.
Conventional wing-to-fuselage fillets.
Unsafe Condition
Compliance
(d) This AD results from fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We
are issuing this AD to reduce the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks in the event
of a severe lightning strike, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in fuel tank explosions and
consequent loss of the airplane.
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006–
16–03
Installation or Replacement
(f) For airplanes with manufacturer’s
fuselage numbers identified in the applicable
service bulletin listed in Table 2 of this AD:
Within 7,500 flight hours or 60 months after
September 7, 2006 (the effective date of AD
2006–16–03), whichever occurs earlier:
Install or replace with improved parts, as
applicable, the bonding straps between the
metallic frame of the fillet and the wing
leading edge ribs, on both the left and right
sides of the airplane, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin identified in Table
1 or Table 2 of this AD.
TABLE 2—FUSELAGE NUMBERS AFFECTED BY AD 2006–16–03
McDonnell Douglas DC–10 Service Bulletin—
Revision—
53–109 ....................................................................................
53–111 ....................................................................................
New Requirements of This AD
Installation or Replacement
(g) For airplanes with fuselage numbers not
identified in Table 2 of this AD: Within 7,500
flight hours or 60 months, whichever occurs
first after the effective date of this AD, install
or replace with improved parts, as
applicable, the bonding straps between the
metallic frame of the fillet and the wing
leading edge ribs, on both the left and right
sides of the airplane, and reposition two
bonding straps. Do the actions in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin identified in Table
1 of this AD.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Strap Repositioning for Certain Airplanes
(h) For Configuration 3 airplanes, as
identified in McDonnell Douglas DC–10
Service Bulletin DC10–53–109, Revision 6,
dated July 10, 2008: Within 7,500 flight hours
or 60 months, whichever occurs first after the
effective date of this AD, reposition two
bonding straps, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(i)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
Samuel Lee, Aerospace Engineer, Samuel
Lee, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch,
ANM–140L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712–
4137; telephone (562) 627–5262; fax (562)
627–5210; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
Dated—
4
3
For airplanes with—
October 7, 1992 ..........
August 24, 1992 ..........
Extended wing-to-fuselage fillets.
Conventional wing-to-fuselage fillets.
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 2006–16–03 are
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD. McDonnell Douglas
DC–10 Service Bulletins DC10–53–109 and
DC10–53–111, both Revision 5, both dated
March 19, 2008, and Service Bulletin DC10–
53–109, Revision 6, dated July 10, 2008, have
been approved by the FAA as an AMOC with
the requirements of AD 2006–16–03.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 16, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–28129 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1240; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–098–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hawker
Beechcraft Corporation Model BH.125
Series 600A Airplanes and Model
HS.125 Series 700A Airplanes Modified
in Accordance With Supplemental
Type Certificate (STC) SA2271SW
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BH.125 series 600A airplanes and
Model HS.125 series 700A airplanes.
This proposed AD would require
inspecting the wiring diagrams
containing the cockpit blowers and
comparing with the current airplane
configuration, and reworking the wiring
if necessary. This proposed AD results
from a report indicating that a blower
motor of the cockpit ventilation and
avionics cooling system seized up and
gave off smoke. We are proposing this
AD to prevent smoke and fumes in the
cockpit in the event that a blower motor
seizes and overheats due to excessive
current draw.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 12, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation, Department 62, P.O. Box
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
71960
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
85, Wichita, Kansas 67201–0085;
telephone 316–676–8238; fax 316–676–
6706; e-mail
tmdc@hawkerbeechcraft.com; Internet
https://www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/
service_support/pubs.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andy Shaw, Aerospace Engineer,
Special Certification Office, ASW–190,
FAA Southwest Regional Office, 2601
Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas
76137; telephone (817) 222–5188; fax
(817) 222–5785.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The cockpit blowers on certain
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BH.125 series 600A airplanes and
Model HS.125 series 700A airplanes
modified in accordance with
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
SA2271SW are identical to those on the
affected Raytheon Model Hawker 125–
800 airplanes. Therefore, all of these
models may be subject to the same
unsafe condition.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
We previously issued AD 2005–16–
02, amendment 39–14207 (70 FR 44273,
August 2, 2005), applicable to certain
Raytheon Model HS.125 series 700A
airplanes, Model BAe.125 series 800A
airplanes, and Model Hawker 800 and
Hawker 800XP airplanes. That AD
requires inspecting to determine the
current rating of the circuit breakers of
certain cockpit ventilation and avionics
cooling system blowers; and replacing
the circuit breakers and modifying the
blower wiring, as applicable.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–1240; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–098–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin 24–3850,
dated January 2008. The service bulletin
describes procedures for inspecting the
wiring diagrams containing the cockpit
blowers and comparing with the current
airplane configuration, and reworking
the wiring if necessary.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all relevant information and
determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the(se)
same type design(s). This proposed AD
would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously,
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between the Proposed AD and Service
Bulletin.’’
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Discussion
We have received a report indicating
that a blower motor of the cockpit
ventilation and avionics cooling system
seized up and gave off smoke on a
Raytheon Model Hawker 125–800
airplane. Investigation revealed
inadequate short circuit protection on
the blower motor electrical circuit. This
condition, if not corrected, could result
in smoke and fumes in the cockpit in
the event that a blower motor seizes and
overheats due to excessive current draw.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and Service Bulletin
Although the NOTE specified in
paragraph 3.A. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin 24–3850
specifies that operators should consult
the Inspection Authorization,
Designated Engineering Representative,
FAA, or Hawker Beechcraft Corporation
for determination as to the suitability of
the service bulletin, this proposed AD
would require that the determination be
approved by the FAA.
Operators should note that, although
the Accomplishment Instructions of the
referenced service bulletin describe
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
procedures for submitting a sheet
recording compliance with the service
bulletin, this proposed AD would not
require that action.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 40 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with this inspection proposed
by this AD. The average labor rate is $80
per work-hour. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this proposed
AD to the U.S. operators to be $3,200,
or $80 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Arkansas Modification Center, Inc.: Docket
No. FAA–2008–1240; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–098–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
12, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation Model BH.125 series 600A
airplanes and Model HS.125 series 700A
airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin 24–3850, dated January
2008, which have been modified in
accordance with Supplemental Type
Certificate SA2271SW.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report indicating
that a blower motor of the cockpit ventilation
and avionics cooling system seized up and
gave off smoke. We are issuing this AD to
prevent smoke and fumes in the cockpit in
the event that a blower motor seizes and
overheats due to excessive current draw.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
No Submission of Certain Information
(g) Although Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin 24–3850, dated January
2008, specifies to submit certain information
to the manufacturer, this AD does not
include that requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Special Certification
Office, ASW–190, Rotorcraft Directorate,
FAA, ATTN: Andy Shaw, Aerospace
Engineer, Special Certification Office, ASW–
190, FAA, Southwest Regional Office, 2601
Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas
76137; telephone (817) 222–5188; fax (817)
222–5785; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 16, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–28168 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
[C]hafed wirings were found in the rear
baggage zone, closed [close] to the forward
side of the aft pressure bulkhead, due to
contact with an understructure securing
screw. The concerned wiring harness
includes rudder trim, pitch trim and stick
pusher control wires. Damages on those
wires might lead to the loss of fail safe
criteria for those critical functions.
The unsafe condition is reduced
controllability of the airplane. The
proposed AD would require actions that
are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 26,
2008.
You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1237; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–125–AD]
Inspection and Rework
(f) Within 600 flight hours or 6 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, inspect the wiring diagrams
containing the cockpit blowers and compare
with the current airplane configuration, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin 24–3850, dated January
2008; except as provided by paragraph (g) of
this AD.
(1) If the current airplane configuration
does not match the applicable cockpit blower
wiring diagrams, before further flight, rework
the wiring using a method approved by the
Manager, Special Certification Office, ASW–
190, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA. For the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
determination to be approved by the
Manager, Special Certification Office, as
required by this paragraph, the Manager’s
approval letter must specifically refer to this
AD.
(2) If the current airplane configuration
matches the applicable cockpit blower wiring
diagrams, before further flight, rework the
wiring in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker
Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24–
3850, dated January 2008.
71961
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; ATR Model
ATR42–200, ATR42–300, ATR42–320,
ATR42–500, ATR72–101, ATR72–201,
ATR72–102, ATR72–202, ATR72–211,
ATR72–212, and ATR72–212A
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 26, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71959-71961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28168]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-1240; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-098-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BH.125 Series 600A Airplanes and Model HS.125 Series 700A Airplanes
Modified in Accordance With Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
SA2271SW
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model BH.125 series 600A
airplanes and Model HS.125 series 700A airplanes. This proposed AD
would require inspecting the wiring diagrams containing the cockpit
blowers and comparing with the current airplane configuration, and
reworking the wiring if necessary. This proposed AD results from a
report indicating that a blower motor of the cockpit ventilation and
avionics cooling system seized up and gave off smoke. We are proposing
this AD to prevent smoke and fumes in the cockpit in the event that a
blower motor seizes and overheats due to excessive current draw.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 12,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Hawker
Beechcraft Corporation, Department 62, P.O. Box
[[Page 71960]]
85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085; telephone 316-676-8238; fax 316-676-
6706; e-mail tmdc@hawkerbeechcraft.com; Internet https://
www.hawkerbeechcraft.com/service_support/pubs.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy Shaw, Aerospace Engineer, Special
Certification Office, ASW-190, FAA Southwest Regional Office, 2601
Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-5188;
fax (817) 222-5785.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1240;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-098-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report indicating that a blower motor of the
cockpit ventilation and avionics cooling system seized up and gave off
smoke on a Raytheon Model Hawker 125-800 airplane. Investigation
revealed inadequate short circuit protection on the blower motor
electrical circuit. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
smoke and fumes in the cockpit in the event that a blower motor seizes
and overheats due to excessive current draw.
The cockpit blowers on certain Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BH.125 series 600A airplanes and Model HS.125 series 700A airplanes
modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
SA2271SW are identical to those on the affected Raytheon Model Hawker
125-800 airplanes. Therefore, all of these models may be subject to the
same unsafe condition.
Other Relevant Rulemaking
We previously issued AD 2005-16-02, amendment 39-14207 (70 FR
44273, August 2, 2005), applicable to certain Raytheon Model HS.125
series 700A airplanes, Model BAe.125 series 800A airplanes, and Model
Hawker 800 and Hawker 800XP airplanes. That AD requires inspecting to
determine the current rating of the circuit breakers of certain cockpit
ventilation and avionics cooling system blowers; and replacing the
circuit breakers and modifying the blower wiring, as applicable.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-
3850, dated January 2008. The service bulletin describes procedures for
inspecting the wiring diagrams containing the cockpit blowers and
comparing with the current airplane configuration, and reworking the
wiring if necessary.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the(se) same type
design(s). This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information described previously, except as
discussed under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service
Bulletin.''
Differences Between the Proposed AD and Service Bulletin
Although the NOTE specified in paragraph 3.A. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-3850
specifies that operators should consult the Inspection Authorization,
Designated Engineering Representative, FAA, or Hawker Beechcraft
Corporation for determination as to the suitability of the service
bulletin, this proposed AD would require that the determination be
approved by the FAA.
Operators should note that, although the Accomplishment
Instructions of the referenced service bulletin describe procedures for
submitting a sheet recording compliance with the service bulletin, this
proposed AD would not require that action.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 40 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per
product to comply with this inspection proposed by this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $3,200, or $80
per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
[[Page 71961]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Arkansas Modification Center, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2008-1240;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-098-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 12, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Hawker Beechcraft Corporation Model
BH.125 series 600A airplanes and Model HS.125 series 700A airplanes,
certificated in any category; as identified in Hawker Beechcraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-3850, dated January 2008, which have
been modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate
SA2271SW.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report indicating that a blower motor
of the cockpit ventilation and avionics cooling system seized up and
gave off smoke. We are issuing this AD to prevent smoke and fumes in
the cockpit in the event that a blower motor seizes and overheats
due to excessive current draw.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Inspection and Rework
(f) Within 600 flight hours or 6 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, inspect the wiring diagrams
containing the cockpit blowers and compare with the current airplane
configuration, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-3850, dated January
2008; except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD.
(1) If the current airplane configuration does not match the
applicable cockpit blower wiring diagrams, before further flight,
rework the wiring using a method approved by the Manager, Special
Certification Office, ASW-190, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA. For the
determination to be approved by the Manager, Special Certification
Office, as required by this paragraph, the Manager's approval letter
must specifically refer to this AD.
(2) If the current airplane configuration matches the applicable
cockpit blower wiring diagrams, before further flight, rework the
wiring in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Hawker
Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-3850, dated January 2008.
No Submission of Certain Information
(g) Although Hawker Beechcraft Mandatory Service Bulletin 24-
3850, dated January 2008, specifies to submit certain information to
the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, Special Certification Office, ASW-190,
Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, ATTN: Andy Shaw, Aerospace Engineer,
Special Certification Office, ASW-190, FAA, Southwest Regional
Office, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone
(817) 222-5188; fax (817) 222-5785; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 16, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-28168 Filed 11-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P