Oil Pollution Prevention; Non-Transportation Related Onshore Facilities, 72016-72022 [E8-28120]
Download as PDF
72016
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
approvable rule revision within 18
months of such a finding, EPA may take
interim final action, effective upon
publication, to stay the sanctions prior
to proposing approval and taking
comment on the submittal. Also, a FIP
may be promulgated under section
110(c)(1) of the Act, if EPA finds that a
SIP revision does not satisfy the
minimum criteria established under
section 110(k)(2) of the CAA. The FIP
may be adopted at any time within 2
years of such a finding, unless the State
corrects the deficiency and EPA
approves the revision before the FIP is
promulgated. Final approval of the
revision correcting the identified
deficiencies would terminate imposition
of the FIP.
We will accept comments on this
proposal for the next 60 days. After
review of public comments, we intend
to publish a rule to promulgate final
limited approval and final limited
disapproval of the provisions identified
above into the Texas SIP.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Intergovernmental
relations, Lead, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 18, 2008.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E8–28162 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 112
[EPA–HQ–OPA–2008–0546; FRL–8745–9]
RIN 2050–AG49
Oil Pollution Prevention; NonTransportation Related Onshore
Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to amend the
dates by which facilities must prepare
or amend Spill Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans, and
implement those Plans. The Agency is
also proposing to establish dates for
farms to prepare or amend their Spill
Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure Plans (SPCC Plans),
and implement those Plans. EPA had
delayed establishing compliance dates
for farms pending revisions to the SPCC
rule that would specifically address this
sector. Two different extension dates are
proposed for farms and production
facilities that meet the qualified
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
facilities criteria. Elsewhere in this
Federal Register, the Agency is
finalizing certain tailored and
streamlined requirements for facilities
subject to the SPCC requirements.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by December 26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
directed to Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OPA–2008–0546. Comments may be
submitted by one of the following
methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments;
(2) E-mail: Comments may be sent by
electronic mail (e-mail) to: rcradocket@epa.gov, Attention Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OPA–2008–0546.
(3) Fax: Comments may be faxed to
202–566–9744, Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OPA–2008–0546.
(4) Mail: The mailing address of the
docket for this rulemaking is EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OPA–2008–0546, mail code
2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Attention
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OPA–2008–
0546.
(5) Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington DC
20460. Attention Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OPA–2008–0546. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Please note that EPA’s
policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public docket
without change, and may be made
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email.
The Federal regulations.gov Web site
is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means that EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of the
comment and along with any disk or
CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files
should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and
be free of any defects or viruses. For
additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit the EPA Docket
Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index at
https://www.regulations.gov. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available (i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by a statute). Certain material,
such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form.
Publicly available docket materials
are available either electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the EPA Docket Center, EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number to make an
appointment to view the docket is (202)
566–0276.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information, contact the
Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP and Oil
Information Center at (800) 424–9346 or
TDD (800) 553–7672 (hearing impaired).
In the Washington, DC metropolitan
area, call (703) 412–9810 or TDD (703)
412–3323. For more detailed
information on specific aspects of this
proposed rule, contact either Vanessa
Rodriguez at (202) 564–7913
(rodriguez.vanessa@epa.gov) or Mark W.
Howard at (202) 564–1964
(howard.markw@epa.gov), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC, 20460–0002, Mail
Code 5104A.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
Industry sector
NAICS code
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Oil Production ............................................................................................................................................................
Farms .........................................................................................................................................................................
Electric Utility Plants ..................................................................................................................................................
Petroleum Refining and Related Industries ...............................................................................................................
Chemical Manufacturing ............................................................................................................................................
Food Manufacturing ...................................................................................................................................................
Manufacturing Facilities Using and Storing Animal Fats and Vegetable Oils ..........................................................
Metal Manufacturing ..................................................................................................................................................
Other Manufacturing ..................................................................................................................................................
Real Estate Rental and Leasing ................................................................................................................................
Retail Trade ...............................................................................................................................................................
Contract Construction ................................................................................................................................................
Wholesale Trade ........................................................................................................................................................
Other Commercial ......................................................................................................................................................
Transportation ............................................................................................................................................................
Arts Entertainment & Recreation ...............................................................................................................................
Other Services (Except Public Administration) .........................................................................................................
Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals ....................................................................................................................
Education ...................................................................................................................................................................
Hospitals & Other Health Care ..................................................................................................................................
Accommodation and Food Services ..........................................................................................................................
Fuel Oil Dealers .........................................................................................................................................................
Gasoline stations .......................................................................................................................................................
Information Finance and Insurance ...........................................................................................................................
Mining ........................................................................................................................................................................
Warehousing and Storage .........................................................................................................................................
Religious Organizations .............................................................................................................................................
Military Installations ...................................................................................................................................................
Pipelines ....................................................................................................................................................................
Government ...............................................................................................................................................................
The list of potentially affected entities
in the above table may not be
exhaustive. The Agency’s goal is to
provide a guide for readers to consider
regarding entities that potentially could
be affected by this action. However, this
proposed action may affect other
entities not listed in this table. If you
have questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding section titled FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT .
B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Follow directions—The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
• Explain why you agree or disagree,
suggest alternatives, and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
PO 00000
Frm 00070
72017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
211111
111, 112
2211
324
325
311, 312
311, 325
331, 332
31–33
531–533
441–446, 448, 451–454
23
42
492, 541, 551, 561–562
481–488
711–713
811–813
4247
61
621, 622
721, 722
45431
4471
51, 52
212
493
813110
928110
4861, 48691
92
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Authority
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 2720;
E.O. 12777 (October 18, 1991), 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p.351.
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
72018
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
III. Background
On July 17, 2002, the Agency
published a final rule that amended the
SPCC regulations (see 67 FR 47042). The
rule became effective on August 16,
2002. The final rule included
compliance dates in § 112.3 for
preparing, amending, and implementing
SPCC Plans. The original compliance
dates were amended on January 9, 2003
(see 68 FR 1348), on April 17, 2003 (see
68 FR 18890), on August 11, 2004 (see
69 FR 48794), on February 17, 2006 (see
71 FR 8462), and on May 16, 2007 (see
72 FR 27444).
On December 26, 2006, EPA finalized
a set of SPCC rule amendments that
address certain targeted areas of the
SPCC requirements based on issues and
concerns raised by the regulated
community (71 FR 77266). While EPA
worked to determine if the agriculture
sector warranted specific consideration
under the SPCC rule, it delayed the
compliance dates for preparing, or
amending and implementing SPCC
Plans for farms subject to SPCC (see 71
FR 77266, December 26, 2006). Under
the current provisions in § 112.3(a) and
(b), the compliance dates for farms are
delayed until the effective date of a rule
that establishes SPCC requirements
specifically for this sector or that
otherwise establishes dates by which
farms must comply with the provisions
of this part.
On October 15, 2007 (see 72 FR
58378), EPA proposed to amend the
SPCC rule in order to provide increased
clarity, to tailor requirements to
particular industry sectors (including
farms), and to streamline certain
requirements for a facility owner or
operator subject to the rule. Elsewhere
in this Federal Register, the Agency is
promulgating amendments to the SPCC
rule that tailor and streamline
requirements for facilities subject to the
SPCC rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
IV. Proposal To Amend Compliance
Dates
Under the current provisions in
§ 112.3(a) and (b), the owner or operator
of a facility that was in operation on or
before August 16, 2002 must make any
necessary amendments to its SPCC Plan
and fully implement it by July 1, 2009;
the owner or operator of a facility that
came into operation after August 16,
2002, but before July 1, 2009, must
prepare and fully implement an SPCC
Plan on or before July 1, 2009; and the
owner or operator of a facility
(excluding production facilities) that
becomes operational after July 1, 2009
must prepare and implement a Plan
before it begins operations (the owner of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
operator of a production facility must
prepare and implement a Plan within
six months after beginning operations).
In addition, § 112.3(c) requires onshore
and offshore mobile facilities to prepare
or amend and implement SPCC Plans on
or before July 1, 2009.
This proposed rule would amend the
dates in § 112.3(a), (b) and (c) by which
facilities must prepare or amend their
SPCC Plans, and implement those Plans
to establish a date one year from
promulgation of the final rule amending
40 CFR part 112 published elsewhere in
this Federal Register. Two different
extension dates are also proposed for
farms and production facilities that
meet the qualified facilities criteria in
§ 112.3(g). Qualified facilities that are
farms or production facilities would
have two or five years respectively from
promulgation of the final rule amending
40 CFR part 112 published elsewhere in
this Federal Register.
requirements promulgated elsewhere in
this Federal Register. This proposed
extension will allow those potentially
affected in the regulated community one
full year to make changes to their
facilities and to their SPCC Plans
necessary to comply with the revised
SPCC requirements. EPA believes that a
one-year period provides sufficient time
for the regulated community to
understand the streamlined
amendments to the SPCC rule finalized
elsewhere in this Federal Register.
The Agency seeks comment on this
proposed compliance date by which
owners and operators of facilities would
be required to prepare, amend, and
implement SPCC Plans in accordance
with amendments to the SPCC Rule.
Any alternative dates presented must
include appropriate rationale and
supporting data in order for the Agency
to be able to consider them for final
action.
A. Proposal To Extend Compliance
Dates for All Facilities
Under the proposed revision to
§ 112.3(a)(1), the owner or operator of a
facility that was in operation on or
before August 16, 2002 would be
required to make any necessary
amendments to its SPCC Plan and fully
implement it by November 20, 2009,
while the owner or operator of a facility
that came into operation after August
16, 2002, but before November 20, 2009,
would be required to prepare and fully
implement an SPCC Plan on or before
November 20, 2009.
Under the proposed revision to
§ 112.3(b)(1), the owner or operator of a
facility that becomes operational after
November 20, 2009 would be required
to prepare and implement an SPCC Plan
before beginning operations. This rule
similarly proposes to extend the
compliance date in § 112.3(c) for mobile
facilities. An owner or operator of a
mobile facility would be required to
prepare or amend and implement an
SPCC Plan on or after November 20,
2009, or before beginning operations if
operations begin after November 20,
2009.
The Agency believes that such an
extension of the compliance dates is
appropriate because it will provide the
owner or operator of a facility the
opportunity to fully understand the
regulatory amendments offered by
revisions to the 2002 SPCC rule
promulgated on December 26, 2006 (71
FR 77266) 1 and with the revised SPCC
B. Proposal To Establish Compliance
Dates for Farms and Extend Compliance
Dates for Farms That Meet the Qualified
Facility Criteria
Elsewhere in this Federal Register,
EPA is promulgating a final set of SPCC
rule amendments that targets certain
areas of the SPCC requirements specific
to farms. This proposed rule would
establish the dates by which a facility,
defined as a farm in § 112.2, would be
required to prepare or amend and
implement its SPCC Plan. EPA proposes
that a farm in operation on or before
August 16, 2002 would have to make
any necessary amendments to its SPCC
Plan and implement that Plan on or
before November 20, 2009 and a farm
that came into operation after August
16, 2002 would have to prepare and
implement an SPCC Plan on or before
November 20, 2009 (consistent with
other facilities, as established in
§ 112.3(a)(1)). A farm that comes into
operation after November 20, 2009
would have to prepare and implement
an SPCC Plan before beginning
operations (consistent with other
facilities in § 112.3(b)(1)). However, for
farms that meet the criteria for a
qualified facility as described in
§ 112.3(g) EPA is proposing a separate
compliance date in § 112.3(a)(2) and
(b)(2). Under section § 112.3(g), a
qualified facility is one that: has an
aggregate aboveground storage capacity
of 10,000 gallons or less; and has had no
single discharge as described in
§ 112.1(b) exceeding 1,000 U.S. gallons
or no two discharges as described in
§ 112.1(b) each exceeding 42 U.S.
gallons within any twelve month period
in the three years prior to the SPCC Plan
certification date, or since becoming
1 As stated in the rule, a facility owner or operator
must maintain its existing Plan. A facility owner or
operator who wants to take advantage of the 2002
and 2006 regulatory changes may do so, but will
need to modify his existing Plan accordingly.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
subject to Part 112 if the facility has
been in operation for less than three
years (other than discharges as
described in § 112.1(b) that are the
result of natural disasters, acts of war,
or terrorism). If your onshore facility is
a farm, as defined in § 112.2, that meets
the criteria for a qualified facility as
described in § 112.3(g), and was in
operation on or before August 16, 2002,
you must maintain your Plan, but would
be required to amend it, if necessary to
ensure compliance with this part, and
implement the Plan no later than
November 20, 2010. Likewise, if your
onshore facility is a farm, as defined in
§ 112.2, that meets the criteria for a
qualified facility as described in
§ 112.3(g), and becomes operational
after August 16, 2002, through
November 20, 2010, and could
reasonably be expected to have a
discharge as described in § 112.1(b), you
would be required to prepare and
implement a Plan on or before
November 20, 2010.
The Agency is proposing this
compliance date for farms proposed in
this notice for several reasons. The
original extension allowed the Agency
to conduct additional information
collection and analyses to determine if
differentiated SPCC requirements may
be appropriate for farms. The Agency
worked with the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) to collect data to
more accurately characterize oil
handling at these facilities, thus
allowing the Agency to better tailor and
streamline the SPCC requirements to
address the concerns of the farming
sector. The proposed compliance date
would now provide facilities the
necessary time to fully understand the
regulatory amendments, including the
2002 and 2006 SPCC rule amendments,
in addition to those finalized elsewhere
in this Federal Register.2 The proposed
dates will allow this sector ample time
to make changes to their facilities and
to their SPCC Plans necessary to comply
with the revised requirements.
The Agency believes the compliance
date proposed in this notice for farms
that meet the criteria for a qualified
facility as described in § 112.3(g) is
warranted to ensure adequate time for
specific outreach activities by the
United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) and others to the widely
dispersed farming community. The
qualified facility provisions allow
2 As stated in the rules, farms must maintain their
existing Plans, to the extent they are required to
have one. However, farms that want to take
advantage of the regulatory changes finalized in a
separate notice in this Federal Register may do so,
but the owner and operator of the facility will need
to modify their existing Plan accordingly.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
individual owners or operators to
develop their own SPCC Plans specific
to their operations, and organized
education programs at the farm level
will be helpful to ensure successful
utilization of these provisions of the
SPCC regulation. Qualified facility
farms are located throughout the
country and, given this broad
geographic reach, additional time is
needed to conduct education programs
and provide information to farms about
their eligibility for qualified facility
status and its provisions. The USDA, in
concert with others, such as state
extension services and the National
Resources Conservation Service, will
seek to provide this training and
information in most counties across the
country to the diverse farming
community within the additional time
proposed in this notice. The Agency
seeks comment on the proposed
compliance dates by which owners and
operators of farms including those that
meet the qualified facilities criteria,
would be required to prepare or amend
and implement their SPCC Plans in
accordance with amendments to the
SPCC rule. Any alternative dates
presented must include appropriate
rationale and supporting data in order
for the Agency to be able to consider
them for final action.
C. Proposal To Extend Compliance
Dates for Production Facilities That
Meet the Qualified Facility Criteria
The final set of SPCC rule
amendments promulgated elsewhere in
this Federal Register, also targets
certain areas of the SPCC requirements
specific to production facilities. EPA is
proposing a separate compliance date
for production facilities that meet the
criteria for a qualified facility as
described in 112.3(g). If your onshore
facility is a production facility, as
defined in § 112.2, that meets the
criteria for a qualified facility as
described in § 112.3(g), and was in
operation on or before August 16, 2002,
you must maintain your Plan, but would
be required to amend it, if necessary to
ensure compliance with this part, and
implement the Plan no later than
November 20, 2013. Likewise, if your
onshore facility is a production facility,
as defined in § 112.2, that meets the
criteria for a qualified facility as
described in § 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after August 16, 2002,
through November 20, 2013, and could
reasonably be expected to have a
discharge as described in § 112.1(b), you
would be required to prepare and
implement a Plan on or before
November 20, 2013. If you are the owner
or operator of an oil production facility,
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72019
as defined in § 112.2, that meets the
criteria for a qualified facility as
described in § 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after November 20, 2013,
and could reasonably be expected to
have a discharge as described in
§ 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan within six months
after you begin operations.
The Agency is proposing this
compliance date for production
facilities for several reasons. The
original extension allowed the Agency
to conduct additional information
collection and analyses to determine if
additional differentiated SPCC
requirements may be appropriate for
production facilities. The proposed
compliance date would now provide
these facilities the necessary time to
fully understand the regulatory
amendments, including the 2002 and
2006 SPCC rule amendments, in
addition to those finalized elsewhere in
this Federal Register. The proposed
dates will allow this sector ample time
to make changes to their facilities and
to their SPCC Plans necessary to comply
with the revised requirements. This
extension will also provide the Agency
with sufficient time to initiate work
with relevant trade associations, the
Interstate Oil and Gas Compact
Commission (IOGCC) and the
Department of Energy (DOE) on
outreach and compliance assistance
tools to help qualified oil production
facilities develop their self-certified
Plans. Finally, given: (1) The large
number of marginal or stripper wells in
the U.S.3; (2) that they contribute a
significant portion of the country’s oil
production; and (3) EPA’s
understanding of the production
process, the particular aboveground oil
storage container capacities, and the
nature of the fluids handled and
operations conducted at certain small
oil production facilities, the Agency is
proposing additional time for these
facilities to come into compliance.
The Agency seeks comment on the
proposed compliance dates by which
owners and operators of production
facilities that meet the qualified
facilities criteria, would be required to
prepare or amend and implement their
SPCC Plans in accordance with
amendments to the SPCC rule. Any
alternative dates presented must include
appropriate rationale and supporting
data in order for the Agency to be able
to consider them for final action.
3 The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission
estimates that there are 422,255 marginal oil wells
as of January 1, 2007 (IOGCC Marginal Wells: 2007
Report)
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
72020
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This proposed action is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under the
Executive Order.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed action does not impose
an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
This proposed rule would merely
extend the compliance dates for
facilities subject to the rule.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
Small entity is defined as: (1) A small
business as defined in the Small
Business Administration’s (SBA)
regulations at 13 CFR 121.201—the SBA
defines small businesses by category of
business using North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) codes,
and in the case of farms and production
facilities, which constitute a large
percentage of the facilities affected by
this proposed rule, generally defines
small businesses as having less than
$500,000 in revenues or 500 employees,
respectively; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise that is independently owned
and operated and is not dominant in its
field.
After considering the economic
impacts of this proposed rule on small
entities, the Agency concludes that this
proposed action would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. In
determining whether a rule has a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the
impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
entities, since the primary purpose of
the regulatory flexibility analyses is to
identify and address regulatory
alternatives ‘‘which minimize any
significant economic impact of the
proposed rule on small entities.’’ 5
U.S.C. 603 and 604. Thus, an agency
may certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, or
otherwise has a positive economic effect
on all of the small entities subject to the
rule.
This proposed rule would defer the
regulatory burden for small entities by
extending the compliance dates in
§ 112.3. After considering the economic
impacts of this rule on small entities, I
certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed action contains no
Federal mandates under the provisions
of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538 for State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. The
action imposes no enforceable duty on
any State, local or tribal governments or
the private sector. Therefore, this action
is not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA. This
action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
proposed rule would merely extend the
compliance dates for facilities subject to
the rule.
E. Executive Order 13132—Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), requires EPA to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
This proposed rule does not have
federalism implications. It would not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 13132. Under CWA
section 311(o), States may impose
additional requirements, including more
stringent requirements, relating to the
prevention of oil discharges to navigable
waters. EPA encourages States to
supplement the Federal SPCC regulation
and recognizes that some States have
more stringent requirements (56 FR
54612, (October 22, 1991). This
proposed rule would not preempt State
law or regulations. Thus, Executive
Order 13132 does not apply to this
proposed rule.
F. Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This proposed action does not have
tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). Today’s proposed
rule would not significantly or uniquely
affect communities of Indian tribal
governments. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045—Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risk
This proposed action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR19885,
April 23, 1997) because it is not
economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866, and because the
Agency does not believe the
environmental health or safety risks
addressed by this proposed action
present a disproportionate risk to
children. The public is invited to submit
comments or identify peer-reviewed
studies and data that assess effects of
early life exposure to oil as affected by
the proposed revision to compliance
dates.
H. Executive Order 13211—Actions
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This proposed action is not subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001)), because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA
to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards.
This proposed rulemaking does not
involve technical standards. Therefore,
EPA is not considering the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898—Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 112
Environmental protection, Oil
pollution, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 20, 2008.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the Code
of Federal Regulations is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 112—OIL POLLUTION
PREVENTION
1. The authority citation for part 112
continues to read as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 33 U.S.C.
2720; E.O. 12777 (October 18, 1991), 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351.
2. Section 112.3 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) to
read as follows: § 112.3 Requirement to
prepare and implement a Spill
Prevention, Control, and
Countermeasure Plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(a)(1) Except as provided in (a)(2),
(a)(3), and (a)(4), if your onshore or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
offshore facility was in operation on or
before August 16, 2002, you must
maintain your Plan, but must amend it,
if necessary to ensure compliance with
this part, and implement the Plan no
later than November 20, 2009. If your
onshore or offshore facility becomes
operational after August 16, 2002,
through November 20, 2009, and could
reasonably be expected to have a
discharge as described in § 112.1(b), you
must prepare and implement a Plan on
or before November 20, 2009.
(2) If your onshore facility is a farm,
as defined in § 112.2, that was in
operation on or before August 16, 2002,
you must maintain your Plan, but must
amend it, if necessary to ensure
compliance with this part, and
implement the Plan no later than
November 20, 2009. If your onshore
facility is a farm, as defined in § 112.2,
that becomes operational after August
16, 2002, through November 20, 2009,
and could reasonably be expected to
have a discharge as described in
§ 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan on or before
November 20, 2009.
(3) If your onshore facility is a farm,
as defined in § 112.2, that meets the
criteria for a qualified facility as
described in § 112.3(g), and was in
operation on or before August 16, 2002,
you must maintain your Plan, but must
amend it, if necessary to ensure
compliance with this part, and
implement the Plan no later than
November 20, 2010. If your onshore
facility is a farm, as defined in § 112.2,
that meets the criteria for a qualified
facility as described in § 112.3(g), and
becomes operational after August 16,
2002, through November 20, 2010, and
could reasonably be expected to have a
discharge as described in § 112.1(b), you
must prepare and implement a Plan on
or before November 20, 2010.
(4) If your onshore facility is a
production facility, as defined in
§ 112.2, that meets the criteria for a
qualified facility as described in
§ 112.3(g), and was in operation on or
before August 16, 2002, you must
maintain your Plan, but must amend it,
if necessary to ensure compliance with
this part, and implement the Plan no
later than November 20, 2013. If your
onshore facility is a production facility,
as defined in § 112.2, that meets the
criteria for a qualified facility as
described in § 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after August 16, 2002,
through November 20, 2013, and could
reasonably be expected to have a
discharge as described in § 112.1(b), you
must prepare and implement a Plan on
or before November 20, 2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
72021
(b)(1) If you are the owner or operator
of an onshore or offshore facility
(excluding oil production facilities) that
becomes operational after November 20,
2009, and could reasonably be expected
to have a discharge as described in
§ 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan before you begin
operations.
(2) If your onshore facility is a farm,
as defined in § 112.2, that becomes
operational after November 20, 2009,
and could reasonably be expected to
have a discharge as described in
§ 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan before you begin
operations. If your onshore facility is a
farm, as defined in § 112.2, that meets
the criteria for a qualified facility as
described in § 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after November 20, 2010,
and could reasonably be expected to
have a discharge as described in
§ 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan before you begin
operations.
(3) If you are the owner or operator of
an oil production facility that becomes
operational after November 20, 2009,
and could reasonably be expected to
have a discharge as described in
§ 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan within six months
after you begin operations. If you are the
owner or operator of an oil production
facility, as defined in § 112.2, that meets
the criteria for a qualified facility as
described in § 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after November 20, 2013,
and could reasonably be expected to
have a discharge as described in
§ 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan within six months
after you begin operations.
(c) If you are the owner or operator of
an onshore or offshore mobile facility,
such as an onshore drilling or workover
rig, barge mounted offshore drilling or
workover rig, or portable fueling facility,
you must prepare, implement, and
maintain a facility Plan as required by
this section. You must maintain your
Plan, but must amend and implement it,
if necessary to ensure compliance with
this part, on or before November 20,
2009. If your onshore or offshore mobile
facility becomes operational after
November 20, 2009, and could
reasonably be expected to have a
discharge as described in § 112.1(b), you
must prepare and implement a Plan
before you begin operations. This
provision does not require that you
prepare a new Plan each time you move
the facility to a new site. The Plan may
be a general Plan. When you move the
mobile or portable facility, you must
locate and install it using the discharge
prevention practices outlined in the
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
72022
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Plan for the facility. The Plan is
applicable only while the facility is in
a fixed (non-transportation) operating
mode.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–28120 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:02 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26NOP1.SGM
26NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 26, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72016-72022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28120]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 112
[EPA-HQ-OPA-2008-0546; FRL-8745-9]
RIN 2050-AG49
Oil Pollution Prevention; Non-Transportation Related Onshore
Facilities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
amend the dates by which facilities must prepare or amend Spill
Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans, and implement
those Plans. The Agency is also proposing to establish dates for farms
to prepare or amend their Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure
Plans (SPCC Plans), and implement those Plans. EPA had delayed
establishing compliance dates for farms pending revisions to the SPCC
rule that would specifically address this sector. Two different
extension dates are proposed for farms and production facilities that
meet the qualified facilities criteria. Elsewhere in this Federal
Register, the Agency is finalizing certain tailored and streamlined
requirements for facilities subject to the SPCC requirements.
DATES: Written comments must be received by December 26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be directed to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPA-
2008-0546. Comments may be submitted by one of the following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments;
(2) E-mail: Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to:
rcra-docket@epa.gov, Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPA-2008-0546.
(3) Fax: Comments may be faxed to 202-566-9744, Attention Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPA-2008-0546.
(4) Mail: The mailing address of the docket for this rulemaking is
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPA-2008-0546, mail
code 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPA-2008-0546.
(5) Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington DC 20460. Attention Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPA-2008-0546. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Please note that EPA's policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public docket without change, and may
be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
regulations.gov or e-mail.
The Federal regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means that EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of the comment and along with
any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
[[Page 72017]]
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
at https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available (i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by a statute). Certain material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA
Docket Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the
telephone number to make an appointment to view the docket is (202)
566-0276.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information, contact the
Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP and Oil Information Center at (800) 424-9346
or TDD (800) 553-7672 (hearing impaired). In the Washington, DC
metropolitan area, call (703) 412-9810 or TDD (703) 412-3323. For more
detailed information on specific aspects of this proposed rule, contact
either Vanessa Rodriguez at (202) 564-7913 (rodriguez.vanessa@epa.gov)
or Mark W. Howard at (202) 564-1964 (howard.markw@epa.gov), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC, 20460-0002, Mail Code 5104A.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry sector NAICS code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oil Production............................ 211111
Farms..................................... 111, 112
Electric Utility Plants................... 2211
Petroleum Refining and Related Industries. 324
Chemical Manufacturing.................... 325
Food Manufacturing........................ 311, 312
Manufacturing Facilities Using and Storing 311, 325
Animal Fats and Vegetable Oils...........
Metal Manufacturing....................... 331, 332
Other Manufacturing....................... 31-33
Real Estate Rental and Leasing............ 531-533
Retail Trade.............................. 441-446, 448, 451-454
Contract Construction..................... 23
Wholesale Trade........................... 42
Other Commercial.......................... 492, 541, 551, 561-562
Transportation............................ 481-488
Arts Entertainment & Recreation........... 711-713
Other Services (Except Public 811-813
Administration)..........................
Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals..... 4247
Education................................. 61
Hospitals & Other Health Care............. 621, 622
Accommodation and Food Services........... 721, 722
Fuel Oil Dealers.......................... 45431
Gasoline stations......................... 4471
Information Finance and Insurance......... 51, 52
Mining.................................... 212
Warehousing and Storage................... 493
Religious Organizations................... 813110
Military Installations.................... 928110
Pipelines................................. 4861, 48691
Government................................ 92
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The list of potentially affected entities in the above table may
not be exhaustive. The Agency's goal is to provide a guide for readers
to consider regarding entities that potentially could be affected by
this action. However, this proposed action may affect other entities
not listed in this table. If you have questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
.
B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives,
and substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Authority
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 2720; E.O. 12777 (October 18,
1991), 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351.
[[Page 72018]]
III. Background
On July 17, 2002, the Agency published a final rule that amended
the SPCC regulations (see 67 FR 47042). The rule became effective on
August 16, 2002. The final rule included compliance dates in Sec.
112.3 for preparing, amending, and implementing SPCC Plans. The
original compliance dates were amended on January 9, 2003 (see 68 FR
1348), on April 17, 2003 (see 68 FR 18890), on August 11, 2004 (see 69
FR 48794), on February 17, 2006 (see 71 FR 8462), and on May 16, 2007
(see 72 FR 27444).
On December 26, 2006, EPA finalized a set of SPCC rule amendments
that address certain targeted areas of the SPCC requirements based on
issues and concerns raised by the regulated community (71 FR 77266).
While EPA worked to determine if the agriculture sector warranted
specific consideration under the SPCC rule, it delayed the compliance
dates for preparing, or amending and implementing SPCC Plans for farms
subject to SPCC (see 71 FR 77266, December 26, 2006). Under the current
provisions in Sec. 112.3(a) and (b), the compliance dates for farms
are delayed until the effective date of a rule that establishes SPCC
requirements specifically for this sector or that otherwise establishes
dates by which farms must comply with the provisions of this part.
On October 15, 2007 (see 72 FR 58378), EPA proposed to amend the
SPCC rule in order to provide increased clarity, to tailor requirements
to particular industry sectors (including farms), and to streamline
certain requirements for a facility owner or operator subject to the
rule. Elsewhere in this Federal Register, the Agency is promulgating
amendments to the SPCC rule that tailor and streamline requirements for
facilities subject to the SPCC rule.
IV. Proposal To Amend Compliance Dates
Under the current provisions in Sec. 112.3(a) and (b), the owner
or operator of a facility that was in operation on or before August 16,
2002 must make any necessary amendments to its SPCC Plan and fully
implement it by July 1, 2009; the owner or operator of a facility that
came into operation after August 16, 2002, but before July 1, 2009,
must prepare and fully implement an SPCC Plan on or before July 1,
2009; and the owner or operator of a facility (excluding production
facilities) that becomes operational after July 1, 2009 must prepare
and implement a Plan before it begins operations (the owner of operator
of a production facility must prepare and implement a Plan within six
months after beginning operations). In addition, Sec. 112.3(c)
requires onshore and offshore mobile facilities to prepare or amend and
implement SPCC Plans on or before July 1, 2009.
This proposed rule would amend the dates in Sec. 112.3(a), (b) and
(c) by which facilities must prepare or amend their SPCC Plans, and
implement those Plans to establish a date one year from promulgation of
the final rule amending 40 CFR part 112 published elsewhere in this
Federal Register. Two different extension dates are also proposed for
farms and production facilities that meet the qualified facilities
criteria in Sec. 112.3(g). Qualified facilities that are farms or
production facilities would have two or five years respectively from
promulgation of the final rule amending 40 CFR part 112 published
elsewhere in this Federal Register.
A. Proposal To Extend Compliance Dates for All Facilities
Under the proposed revision to Sec. 112.3(a)(1), the owner or
operator of a facility that was in operation on or before August 16,
2002 would be required to make any necessary amendments to its SPCC
Plan and fully implement it by November 20, 2009, while the owner or
operator of a facility that came into operation after August 16, 2002,
but before November 20, 2009, would be required to prepare and fully
implement an SPCC Plan on or before November 20, 2009.
Under the proposed revision to Sec. 112.3(b)(1), the owner or
operator of a facility that becomes operational after November 20, 2009
would be required to prepare and implement an SPCC Plan before
beginning operations. This rule similarly proposes to extend the
compliance date in Sec. 112.3(c) for mobile facilities. An owner or
operator of a mobile facility would be required to prepare or amend and
implement an SPCC Plan on or after November 20, 2009, or before
beginning operations if operations begin after November 20, 2009.
The Agency believes that such an extension of the compliance dates
is appropriate because it will provide the owner or operator of a
facility the opportunity to fully understand the regulatory amendments
offered by revisions to the 2002 SPCC rule promulgated on December 26,
2006 (71 FR 77266) \1\ and with the revised SPCC requirements
promulgated elsewhere in this Federal Register. This proposed extension
will allow those potentially affected in the regulated community one
full year to make changes to their facilities and to their SPCC Plans
necessary to comply with the revised SPCC requirements. EPA believes
that a one-year period provides sufficient time for the regulated
community to understand the streamlined amendments to the SPCC rule
finalized elsewhere in this Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As stated in the rule, a facility owner or operator must
maintain its existing Plan. A facility owner or operator who wants
to take advantage of the 2002 and 2006 regulatory changes may do so,
but will need to modify his existing Plan accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Agency seeks comment on this proposed compliance date by which
owners and operators of facilities would be required to prepare, amend,
and implement SPCC Plans in accordance with amendments to the SPCC
Rule. Any alternative dates presented must include appropriate
rationale and supporting data in order for the Agency to be able to
consider them for final action.
B. Proposal To Establish Compliance Dates for Farms and Extend
Compliance Dates for Farms That Meet the Qualified Facility Criteria
Elsewhere in this Federal Register, EPA is promulgating a final set
of SPCC rule amendments that targets certain areas of the SPCC
requirements specific to farms. This proposed rule would establish the
dates by which a facility, defined as a farm in Sec. 112.2, would be
required to prepare or amend and implement its SPCC Plan. EPA proposes
that a farm in operation on or before August 16, 2002 would have to
make any necessary amendments to its SPCC Plan and implement that Plan
on or before November 20, 2009 and a farm that came into operation
after August 16, 2002 would have to prepare and implement an SPCC Plan
on or before November 20, 2009 (consistent with other facilities, as
established in Sec. 112.3(a)(1)). A farm that comes into operation
after November 20, 2009 would have to prepare and implement an SPCC
Plan before beginning operations (consistent with other facilities in
Sec. 112.3(b)(1)). However, for farms that meet the criteria for a
qualified facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g) EPA is proposing a
separate compliance date in Sec. 112.3(a)(2) and (b)(2). Under section
Sec. 112.3(g), a qualified facility is one that: has an aggregate
aboveground storage capacity of 10,000 gallons or less; and has had no
single discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b) exceeding 1,000 U.S.
gallons or no two discharges as described in Sec. 112.1(b) each
exceeding 42 U.S. gallons within any twelve month period in the three
years prior to the SPCC Plan certification date, or since becoming
[[Page 72019]]
subject to Part 112 if the facility has been in operation for less than
three years (other than discharges as described in Sec. 112.1(b) that
are the result of natural disasters, acts of war, or terrorism). If
your onshore facility is a farm, as defined in Sec. 112.2, that meets
the criteria for a qualified facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g),
and was in operation on or before August 16, 2002, you must maintain
your Plan, but would be required to amend it, if necessary to ensure
compliance with this part, and implement the Plan no later than
November 20, 2010. Likewise, if your onshore facility is a farm, as
defined in Sec. 112.2, that meets the criteria for a qualified
facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g), and becomes operational after
August 16, 2002, through November 20, 2010, and could reasonably be
expected to have a discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b), you would
be required to prepare and implement a Plan on or before November 20,
2010.
The Agency is proposing this compliance date for farms proposed in
this notice for several reasons. The original extension allowed the
Agency to conduct additional information collection and analyses to
determine if differentiated SPCC requirements may be appropriate for
farms. The Agency worked with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
to collect data to more accurately characterize oil handling at these
facilities, thus allowing the Agency to better tailor and streamline
the SPCC requirements to address the concerns of the farming sector.
The proposed compliance date would now provide facilities the necessary
time to fully understand the regulatory amendments, including the 2002
and 2006 SPCC rule amendments, in addition to those finalized elsewhere
in this Federal Register.\2\ The proposed dates will allow this sector
ample time to make changes to their facilities and to their SPCC Plans
necessary to comply with the revised requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As stated in the rules, farms must maintain their existing
Plans, to the extent they are required to have one. However, farms
that want to take advantage of the regulatory changes finalized in a
separate notice in this Federal Register may do so, but the owner
and operator of the facility will need to modify their existing Plan
accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Agency believes the compliance date proposed in this notice for
farms that meet the criteria for a qualified facility as described in
Sec. 112.3(g) is warranted to ensure adequate time for specific
outreach activities by the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) and others to the widely dispersed farming community. The
qualified facility provisions allow individual owners or operators to
develop their own SPCC Plans specific to their operations, and
organized education programs at the farm level will be helpful to
ensure successful utilization of these provisions of the SPCC
regulation. Qualified facility farms are located throughout the country
and, given this broad geographic reach, additional time is needed to
conduct education programs and provide information to farms about their
eligibility for qualified facility status and its provisions. The USDA,
in concert with others, such as state extension services and the
National Resources Conservation Service, will seek to provide this
training and information in most counties across the country to the
diverse farming community within the additional time proposed in this
notice. The Agency seeks comment on the proposed compliance dates by
which owners and operators of farms including those that meet the
qualified facilities criteria, would be required to prepare or amend
and implement their SPCC Plans in accordance with amendments to the
SPCC rule. Any alternative dates presented must include appropriate
rationale and supporting data in order for the Agency to be able to
consider them for final action.
C. Proposal To Extend Compliance Dates for Production Facilities That
Meet the Qualified Facility Criteria
The final set of SPCC rule amendments promulgated elsewhere in this
Federal Register, also targets certain areas of the SPCC requirements
specific to production facilities. EPA is proposing a separate
compliance date for production facilities that meet the criteria for a
qualified facility as described in 112.3(g). If your onshore facility
is a production facility, as defined in Sec. 112.2, that meets the
criteria for a qualified facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g), and
was in operation on or before August 16, 2002, you must maintain your
Plan, but would be required to amend it, if necessary to ensure
compliance with this part, and implement the Plan no later than
November 20, 2013. Likewise, if your onshore facility is a production
facility, as defined in Sec. 112.2, that meets the criteria for a
qualified facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after August 16, 2002, through November 20, 2013, and could
reasonably be expected to have a discharge as described in Sec.
112.1(b), you would be required to prepare and implement a Plan on or
before November 20, 2013. If you are the owner or operator of an oil
production facility, as defined in Sec. 112.2, that meets the criteria
for a qualified facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after November 20, 2013, and could reasonably be expected
to have a discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b), you must prepare
and implement a Plan within six months after you begin operations.
The Agency is proposing this compliance date for production
facilities for several reasons. The original extension allowed the
Agency to conduct additional information collection and analyses to
determine if additional differentiated SPCC requirements may be
appropriate for production facilities. The proposed compliance date
would now provide these facilities the necessary time to fully
understand the regulatory amendments, including the 2002 and 2006 SPCC
rule amendments, in addition to those finalized elsewhere in this
Federal Register. The proposed dates will allow this sector ample time
to make changes to their facilities and to their SPCC Plans necessary
to comply with the revised requirements. This extension will also
provide the Agency with sufficient time to initiate work with relevant
trade associations, the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission
(IOGCC) and the Department of Energy (DOE) on outreach and compliance
assistance tools to help qualified oil production facilities develop
their self-certified Plans. Finally, given: (1) The large number of
marginal or stripper wells in the U.S.\3\; (2) that they contribute a
significant portion of the country's oil production; and (3) EPA's
understanding of the production process, the particular aboveground oil
storage container capacities, and the nature of the fluids handled and
operations conducted at certain small oil production facilities, the
Agency is proposing additional time for these facilities to come into
compliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission estimates that
there are 422,255 marginal oil wells as of January 1, 2007 (IOGCC
Marginal Wells: 2007 Report)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Agency seeks comment on the proposed compliance dates by which
owners and operators of production facilities that meet the qualified
facilities criteria, would be required to prepare or amend and
implement their SPCC Plans in accordance with amendments to the SPCC
rule. Any alternative dates presented must include appropriate
rationale and supporting data in order for the Agency to be able to
consider them for final action.
[[Page 72020]]
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under the terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and is therefore not subject to review under the Executive Order.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed action does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq. Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This proposed rule
would merely extend the compliance dates for facilities subject to the
rule.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires an agency to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure
Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Small entities include small businesses, small organizations,
and small governmental jurisdictions.
Small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined in the
Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR 121.201--
the SBA defines small businesses by category of business using North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes, and in the case
of farms and production facilities, which constitute a large percentage
of the facilities affected by this proposed rule, generally defines
small businesses as having less than $500,000 in revenues or 500
employees, respectively; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is
a government of a city, county, town, school district or special
district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise that is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of this proposed rule on
small entities, the Agency concludes that this proposed action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. In determining whether a rule has a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern
is any significant adverse economic impact on small entities, since the
primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify
and address regulatory alternatives ``which minimize any significant
economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604. Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
if the rule relieves regulatory burden, or otherwise has a positive
economic effect on all of the small entities subject to the rule.
This proposed rule would defer the regulatory burden for small
entities by extending the compliance dates in Sec. 112.3. After
considering the economic impacts of this rule on small entities, I
certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed action contains no Federal mandates under the
provisions of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 for State, local, or tribal governments or
the private sector. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any
State, local or tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore,
this action is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 205
of the UMRA. This action is also not subject to the requirements of
section 203 of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This proposed
rule would merely extend the compliance dates for facilities subject to
the rule.
E. Executive Order 13132--Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
This proposed rule does not have federalism implications. It would
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132. Under CWA section 311(o), States
may impose additional requirements, including more stringent
requirements, relating to the prevention of oil discharges to navigable
waters. EPA encourages States to supplement the Federal SPCC regulation
and recognizes that some States have more stringent requirements (56 FR
54612, (October 22, 1991). This proposed rule would not preempt State
law or regulations. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this
proposed rule.
F. Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This proposed action does not have tribal implications, as
specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Today's proposed rule would not significantly or uniquely affect
communities of Indian tribal governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045--Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risk
This proposed action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR19885, April 23, 1997) because it is not economically significant as
defined in Executive Order 12866, and because the Agency does not
believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed by this
proposed action present a disproportionate risk to children. The public
is invited to submit comments or identify peer-reviewed studies and
data that assess effects of early life exposure to oil as affected by
the proposed revision to compliance dates.
H. Executive Order 13211--Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This proposed action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C.
272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and
[[Page 72021]]
business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress,
through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available
and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
This proposed rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
Therefore, EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus
standards.
J. Executive Order 12898--Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 112
Environmental protection, Oil pollution, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 20, 2008.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, of
the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 112--OIL POLLUTION PREVENTION
1. The authority citation for part 112 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 2720; E.O. 12777
(October 18, 1991), 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351.
2. Section 112.3 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (c)
to read as follows: Sec. 112.3 Requirement to prepare and implement a
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan.
* * * * *
(a)(1) Except as provided in (a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4), if your
onshore or offshore facility was in operation on or before August 16,
2002, you must maintain your Plan, but must amend it, if necessary to
ensure compliance with this part, and implement the Plan no later than
November 20, 2009. If your onshore or offshore facility becomes
operational after August 16, 2002, through November 20, 2009, and could
reasonably be expected to have a discharge as described in Sec.
112.1(b), you must prepare and implement a Plan on or before November
20, 2009.
(2) If your onshore facility is a farm, as defined in Sec. 112.2,
that was in operation on or before August 16, 2002, you must maintain
your Plan, but must amend it, if necessary to ensure compliance with
this part, and implement the Plan no later than November 20, 2009. If
your onshore facility is a farm, as defined in Sec. 112.2, that
becomes operational after August 16, 2002, through November 20, 2009,
and could reasonably be expected to have a discharge as described in
Sec. 112.1(b), you must prepare and implement a Plan on or before
November 20, 2009.
(3) If your onshore facility is a farm, as defined in Sec. 112.2,
that meets the criteria for a qualified facility as described in Sec.
112.3(g), and was in operation on or before August 16, 2002, you must
maintain your Plan, but must amend it, if necessary to ensure
compliance with this part, and implement the Plan no later than
November 20, 2010. If your onshore facility is a farm, as defined in
Sec. 112.2, that meets the criteria for a qualified facility as
described in Sec. 112.3(g), and becomes operational after August 16,
2002, through November 20, 2010, and could reasonably be expected to
have a discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan on or before November 20, 2010.
(4) If your onshore facility is a production facility, as defined
in Sec. 112.2, that meets the criteria for a qualified facility as
described in Sec. 112.3(g), and was in operation on or before August
16, 2002, you must maintain your Plan, but must amend it, if necessary
to ensure compliance with this part, and implement the Plan no later
than November 20, 2013. If your onshore facility is a production
facility, as defined in Sec. 112.2, that meets the criteria for a
qualified facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after August 16, 2002, through November 20, 2013, and could
reasonably be expected to have a discharge as described in Sec.
112.1(b), you must prepare and implement a Plan on or before November
20, 2013.
(b)(1) If you are the owner or operator of an onshore or offshore
facility (excluding oil production facilities) that becomes operational
after November 20, 2009, and could reasonably be expected to have a
discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b), you must prepare and
implement a Plan before you begin operations.
(2) If your onshore facility is a farm, as defined in Sec. 112.2,
that becomes operational after November 20, 2009, and could reasonably
be expected to have a discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b), you
must prepare and implement a Plan before you begin operations. If your
onshore facility is a farm, as defined in Sec. 112.2, that meets the
criteria for a qualified facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g), and
becomes operational after November 20, 2010, and could reasonably be
expected to have a discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b), you must
prepare and implement a Plan before you begin operations.
(3) If you are the owner or operator of an oil production facility
that becomes operational after November 20, 2009, and could reasonably
be expected to have a discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b), you
must prepare and implement a Plan within six months after you begin
operations. If you are the owner or operator of an oil production
facility, as defined in Sec. 112.2, that meets the criteria for a
qualified facility as described in Sec. 112.3(g), and becomes
operational after November 20, 2013, and could reasonably be expected
to have a discharge as described in Sec. 112.1(b), you must prepare
and implement a Plan within six months after you begin operations.
(c) If you are the owner or operator of an onshore or offshore
mobile facility, such as an onshore drilling or workover rig, barge
mounted offshore drilling or workover rig, or portable fueling
facility, you must prepare, implement, and maintain a facility Plan as
required by this section. You must maintain your Plan, but must amend
and implement it, if necessary to ensure compliance with this part, on
or before November 20, 2009. If your onshore or offshore mobile
facility becomes operational after November 20, 2009, and could
reasonably be expected to have a discharge as described in Sec.
112.1(b), you must prepare and implement a Plan before you begin
operations. This provision does not require that you prepare a new Plan
each time you move the facility to a new site. The Plan may be a
general Plan. When you move the mobile or portable facility, you must
locate and install it using the discharge prevention practices outlined
in the
[[Page 72022]]
Plan for the facility. The Plan is applicable only while the facility
is in a fixed (non-transportation) operating mode.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-28120 Filed 11-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P