Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Traumatic Injury Protection Program, 71926-71935 [E8-28114]
Download as PDF
71926
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: October 30, 2008.
J.O. Fitton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Miami, FL.
[FR Doc. E8–28150 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 9
RIN 2900–AN00
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
Traumatic Injury Protection Program
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is issuing this interim final
rule to amend the Servicemembers’
Group Life Insurance traumatic injury
protection program (TSGLI) regulations
in order to add losses that would be
covered under the program and to
define terms relevant to these new
losses. This rulemaking also clarifies
language in and reorganizes existing
provisions.
DATES: This interim final rule is
effective November 26, 2008. Comments
must be received on or before December
26, 2008.
Applicability Date: VA will apply this
rule to injuries incurred in Operation
Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi
Freedom on or after October 7, 2001,
through and including November 30,
2005, and to all qualifying injuries
incurred on or after December 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC
20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AN00.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment.
(This is not a toll-free number.) In
addition, during the comment period,
comments are available online through
the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) at https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanne King, Attorney-Advisor,
Department of Veterans Affairs Regional
Office and Insurance Center (310/290B),
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
P.O. Box 8079, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19101, (215) 842–2000,
ext. 4839. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TSGLI
was established by Congress in May
2005 to provide monetary assistance to
severely injured service members who
suffer a loss, such as the loss of a hand,
as a direct result of a serious traumatic
injury in order to help the member and
the member’s family through an often
long and arduous treatment and
rehabilitation period. VA codified
regulations to implement TSGLI at 38
CFR 9.1(k)–(q) and 9.20. See 70 FR
75940 (Dec. 22, 2005); 72 FR 10362
(Mar. 8, 2007).
VA conducted an extensive review of
the TSGLI program at the end of the first
year of the program’s operation (‘‘YearOne Review’’) to ensure that the
program was operating effectively and
that it was meeting the intent of
Congress. The report was published on
the VA Web site on July 17, 2008.
https://www.insurance.va.gov/
miscellaneous/index.htm. Many of the
amendments made by this interim final
rule, particularly the losses that we
propose to add to the Schedule of
Losses in § 9.20, are derived from the
recommendations and findings of the
TSGLI Year-One Review.
Congress has expressed its intent to
provide TSGLI benefits retroactively.
Section 1032(c)(1) of the ‘‘Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act for
Defense, the Global War on Terror, and
Tsunami Relief, 2005,’’ Public Law 109–
13, which established the TSGLI
program effective December 1, 2005,
also provided for the payment of TSGLI
benefits to service members who
experienced a traumatic injury between
October 7, 2001, when Operation
Enduring Freedom began, and December
1, 2005, the effective date of section
1032 of Public Law 109–13, if the loss
was a direct result of injuries incurred
in Operation Enduring Freedom or
Operation Iraqi Freedom. VA as well
has made its regulations implementing
the TSGLI program retroactive. In 2007,
VA applied changes to the TSGLI
program made by the Veterans’ Housing
Opportunity and Benefits Improvement
Act of 2006, Public Law 109–233,
section 501(a)(3), 120 Stat. 397, 413, to
claims filed or injuries suffered prior to
the date of the change in the law
because it was consistent with the
objectives of the TSGLI provisions
authorizing payments based on injuries
preceding the program’s creation. 72 FR
10362, 10363 (2007). We believe that the
same holds true with regard to the
changes made by this rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Further, because TSGLI is intended to
provide a source of income for expenses
during periods of treatment and
convalescence following a loss due to
traumatic injury, we believe the
application of these regulations is more
directly connected to those persistent
circumstances than to the past date on
which an injury or loss was incurred or
a claim was filed. Id. We also note that
these regulatory amendments would not
have affected conduct prior to the date
of publication, nor would the
regulations upset any settled
expectations in any meaningful way.
See Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511
U.S. 244, 280 (1994); Princess Cruises,
Inc. v. United States, 397 F.3d 1358,
1362–63 (Fed. Cir. 2005). The service
member’s traumatic injury, the
scheduled loss due to the injury, and
the resulting economic burdens on the
service member were not within any
party’s control and obviously actions
were not taken in reliance on prior
regulations. Although application of the
regulations will increase the
Government’s economic burden, we
believe the additional burden is
countered in this instance by the other
considerations discussed above.
We are amending 38 CFR 9.1(b) to
provide the current address of the Office
of Servicemembers’ Group Life
Insurance (OSGLI), which is 80
Livingston Avenue, Roseland, New
Jersey 07068.
We are moving the definitions from
38 CFR 9.1(k)–(q), which pertain only to
TSGLI, to 38 CFR 9.20(e)(6)(vi)–(xii) for
purposes of administrative convenience
and to make it easier for the public to
locate the rules. We are expanding the
definition of ‘‘medical professional’’ at
§ 9.20(e)(6)(xii) to include a ‘‘licensed
practitioner of the healing arts acting
within the scope of his or her practice.’’
We have broadened the definition in
order to encompass a wider range of
licensed medical professionals who are
qualified to certify eligibility for TSGLI.
We are revising 38 CFR 9.20(b)(3) to
state that the term ‘‘traumatic event’’
does not include a medical procedure or
a surgical procedure in and of itself.
Current § 9.20(b)(3) only refers to a
surgical procedure. The revision makes
the regulation consistent with VA’s
current practice of not providing TSGLI
payments for an injury that directly
results from either a medical or surgical
procedure. The publication of this
revision to the current rule will not
result in any deviation from already
established guidelines or processes.
Further, the revised definition is
consistent with current 38 CFR
9.20(e)(3)(i)(C), which excludes
payment for a scheduled loss due to a
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
traumatic injury caused by either
medical treatment or surgical treatment
of an illness or disease.
We are adding a new paragraph at the
end of 38 CFR 9.20(d) with regard to the
eligibility requirements for a TSGLI
payment. The governing statute for the
TSGLI program, 38 U.S.C. 1980A(h),
states that ‘‘[c]overage for loss resulting
from traumatic injury provided under
this section shall cease at midnight on
the date of the termination of the
member’s duty status in the uniformed
services that established eligibility for
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance.’’
New § 9.20(d)(5) specifies that a member
would be covered by TSGLI if the
member has a traumatic injury prior to
midnight on the date of termination,
even if the member’s scheduled loss
does not occur until after the member’s
termination date. We are making this
revision to the regulation because in
some cases there is a long period
between the date of a member’s
traumatic injury and the date on which
the scheduled loss actually occurs. For
example, a member who suffers a severe
leg injury from an explosion in service
may not undergo amputation of the leg
until after separating from service. This
amendment to § 9.20(d) would clarify
that, under such circumstances, the
member would be eligible for TSGLI.
Currently, 38 CFR 9.20(e)(3)(i)(C)
provides that TSGLI is not payable if a
traumatic injury is caused by medical or
surgical treatment of an illness or
disease. We are revising that paragraph
to explain that TSGLI also is not payable
if a traumatic injury is caused by
diagnostic procedures or any
complications arising from such
procedures or from medical or surgical
treatment for an illness or disease. The
commercial industry’s Accidental Death
and Dismemberment (AD&D) policies
provide a model for the TSGLI program.
70 FR 75940. Under commercial AD&D
policies, neither diagnostic
complications nor post-surgical
complications due to medical or
surgical treatment usually constitute a
covered loss. We are therefore revising
§ 9.20(d)(5) to make it consistent with
commercial policies. We are also
revising § 9.20(e)(3)(i)(C) to explain that
TSGLI is not payable if a traumatic
injury is caused by preventive medical
procedures such as inoculations.
We are amending 38 CFR
9.20(e)(3)(i)(D), which currently
excludes payment of TSGLI for a
scheduled loss due to a traumatic injury
caused by willful use of a controlled
substance unless administered or
consumed on the advice of a ‘‘medical
doctor.’’ We are deleting the term
‘‘medical doctor’’ and inserting in its
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
place ‘‘medical professional,’’ because
prescriptions for controlled substances
may be dispensed by a caregiver other
than a medical doctor (e.g., a nurse
practitioner). This revision will clarify
that a member who receives a lawful
controlled substance from a medical
professional who is legally authorized to
provide such a controlled substance will
be eligible for a TSGLI payment. Also,
use of the term ‘‘medical professional’’
is consistent with the terminology in the
TSGLI procedural guide, https://
www.insurance.va.gov/sgliSite/TSGLI/
TSGLI.htm, and the TSGLI application
form.
We are amending 38 CFR 9.20(e)(6) to
correct a misstatement concerning the
scope of its application. Current 38 CFR
9.20(e)(6) states that the definitions
apply ‘‘[f]or purposes of this paragraph
(e)(6)—.’’ We have corrected this to
read, ‘‘For purposes of this section—.’’
We also are adding to § 9.20(e)(6)
definitions of terms relevant to
qualifying losses under the existing
TSGLI Schedule of Losses and to other
losses that we are adding to that
schedule in this rulemaking. Because of
the interrelated nature of the definitions
and schedule losses, we will discuss the
definitions in conjunction with the
relevant amendments for each loss.
In the Schedule of Losses, we are
making several non-substantive changes
that will make it easier to use. These
non-substantive changes include
moving the schedule from § 9.20(e)(7) to
§ 9.20(f) and replacing the Roman
numerals preceding each loss with
Arabic numerals. Another nonsubstantive change involves the types of
losses listed in the schedule. The
current schedule lists both single losses
(e.g., total and permanent loss of
speech) and combinations of losses (e.g.,
total and permanent loss of speech and
loss of thumb and index finger on the
same hand). We are removing all losses
involving a combination of losses and
instead explain how the different
individual losses may be combined for
purposes of calculating the TSGLI
benefit that is payable. For losses listed
in paragraphs (f)(1) through (18) of
§ 9.20, payment may be made for
multiple losses resulting from a single
traumatic event (except where noted
otherwise); however, the total payment
amount may not exceed $100,000 for
losses resulting from a single traumatic
event. Payments for losses listed in
paragraphs (f)(19) through (20) of § 9.20
may not be made in addition to
payments for losses under paragraphs
(f)(1) through (18)—only the higher
amount will be paid. The total payment
amount may not exceed $100,000 for
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71927
multiple losses resulting from a single
traumatic event.
Payment for total and permanent loss
of sight is required by 38 U.S.C.
1980A(b)(1)(A). In § 9.20(e)(6)(xiv),
consistent with current VA practice, we
are defining ‘‘total and permanent loss
of sight,’’ which is included in the
Schedule of Losses at § 9.20(f)(1), as: (1)
Visual acuity in the eye of 20/200 or less
(worse) with corrective lenses lasting at
least 120 days; (2) visual acuity in the
eye of greater than 20/200 with
corrective lenses and a visual field of 20
degrees or less lasting at least 120 days;
or (3) anatomical loss of the eye. These
visual-acuity standards are similar to
the eligibility criteria for automobiles
and adaptive equipment for certain
disabled veterans, 38 U.S.C.
3901(1)(A)(iii), and to the definition of
‘‘blindness’’ for purposes of Social
Security disability benefits. 42 U.S.C.
1382c(2).
We are incorporating the temporal
requirement of ‘‘at least 120 days’’ in the
definition of ‘‘permanent and total loss
of sight’’ for the benefit of medical
professionals who are responsible for
certifying TSGLI eligibility of an injured
service member. Staff members at the
branches of service who process TSGLI
claims reported for purposes of the
Year-One Review that medical
professionals were sometimes unwilling
to certify that loss of sight was
‘‘permanent,’’ even when the loss of
sight had already existed for a rather
lengthy period of time and even when
it required substantial rehabilitation on
the part of the member, because the
member might regain some sight due to
surgery (e.g., corneal transplants) at a
later date. Year-One Review at 24.
We are combining the losses for total
and permanent loss of hearing in one
ear and both ears at 38 CFR 9.20(f)(2).
We are defining the term ‘‘total and
permanent loss of hearing’’ at 38 CFR
9.20(e)(6)(xvi) to mean average hearing
threshold sensitivity for air conduction
of at least 80 decibels that is clinically
stable and unlikely to improve and
based upon hearing measured at 500,
1000, and 2000 Hertz. According to the
American Speech-Language-Hearing
Association, a hearing loss is considered
‘‘profound’’ if it measures at 80 decibels.
https://www.asha.org/public/hearing/
testing/assess.htm. We are adding this
definition to provide an objective
standard for determining whether a
hearing loss is total and permanent for
purposes of TSGLI.
In § 9.20(e)(6)(xv), we are defining the
term ‘‘total and permanent loss of
speech,’’ used in § 9.20(f)(3), as ‘‘organic
loss of speech or the ability to express
oneself, both by voice and whisper,
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
71928
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
through normal organs for speech,
notwithstanding the use of an artificial
appliance to simulate speech.’’ The loss
of speech must be clinically stable and
unlikely to improve in order to be
compensable. We are adding this
objective definition to assist the medical
professionals who evaluate injured
service members for purposes of
entitlement to TSGLI.
We are adding uniplegia as a
qualifying loss for TSGLI at § 9.20(f)(7)
and defining ‘‘uniplegia’’ at 38 CFR
9.20(e)(6)(iv) as ‘‘the complete and
irreversible paralysis of one limb of the
body.’’ The Year-One Review states that
research shows that the impact of
rehabilitation and recovery for uniplegia
is similar to the rehabilitation and
recovery from severance of a hand or
foot, which Congress included as a
scheduled loss under 38 U.S.C.
1980A(b)(1)(B). Year-One Review at 24.
The AD&D policies of the commercial
sector, upon which TSGLI was modeled,
also often cover uniplegia. We are
therefore including uniplegia as a
scheduled loss for purposes of TSGLI.
Because uniplegia involves paralysis of
one limb only, and is therefore less
severe a loss than paralysis that involves
more than one limb, and because of the
reported similar effect of the amputation
of one hand or foot, the payment for this
loss is $50,000, which is the amount of
TSGLI payable for amputation of one
hand or one foot. However, we note in
the Schedule that a payment for
uniplegia cannot be combined with the
payments for amputation or limb
salvage, as the initial payment for the
uniplegia loss provides payment to the
service member during the
rehabilitation period.
We are adding a definition of
‘‘complete and irreversible paralysis’’ to
aid in understanding the definitions of
quadriplegia, paraplegia, hemiplegia,
and uniplegia. ‘‘Complete and
irreversible paralysis’’ is defined in
§ 9.20(e)(6)(v) as total loss of voluntary
movement resulting from damage to the
spinal cord or associated nerves, or to
the brain, that is deemed clinically
stable and unlikely to improve.
In § 9.20(e)(6)(xvii) and (f)(8), we are
expanding TSGLI coverage from third
degree or worse burns covering at least
30 percent of the body or 30 percent of
the face to second degree or worse burns
covering at least 20 percent of a service
member’s body or at least 20 percent of
the face. Although 38 U.S.C.
1980A(b)(1)(G) states that the Schedule
of Losses prescribed by the Secretary of
Veterans Affairs must include ‘‘[b]urns
greater than second degree, covering 30
percent of the body or 30 percent of the
face,’’ the statute also authorizes the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to
prescribe additional losses by
regulation. We therefore believe that VA
has authority to add other kinds of
burns to the TSGLI Schedule of Losses.
Second degree burns, also called
partial thickness burns, are less severe
than third degree burns, also called full
thickness burns. Nevertheless, burn
specialists at Brooke Army Medical
Center and VA physicians indicated that
a second degree burn to at least 20
percent of the face or body would be
considered to be a severe burn. YearOne Review at 26. They also reported
that patients with second degree burns
require as much rehabilitation as those
with third degree burns. Id. We are
therefore providing a TSGLI payment of
$100,000 for second degree burns or
worse covering at least 20 percent of the
body or at least 20 percent of the face.
The definition of burns in
§ 9.20(e)(6)(xvii) states explicitly that
the body includes the face and head.
The percentage of the body burned will
be determined by using the Rule of
Nines, which is a chart dividing the
body surface into areas, each of which
represents 9 percent, or another method
for estimating the extent of a member’s
burns that is generally accepted within
the medical profession.
We are replacing the phrase ‘‘loss of’’
hand or foot in the schedule with
‘‘amputation of,’’ and we define
‘‘amputation’’ in § 9.20(e)(6)(xx) to mean
‘‘severance or removal of a limb or part
of a limb resulting from trauma or
surgery.’’ We also explain that, ‘‘[a]n
amputation above a joint means a
severance or removal that is closer to the
body than the specified joint is.’’
(Emphasis added.)
TSGLI coverage under the schedule
will be expanded with respect to
amputation of part of a limb. For
amputation of part of the hand, we are
adding at § 9.20(f)(10) amputation of the
thumb or the other four fingers at or
above the metacarpophalangeal joint, for
which $50,000 in TSGLI is payable. For
amputation of part of the foot, we are
adding at § 9.20(f)(12) amputation at or
above the metatarsophalangeal joints of
all toes on one foot, for which the TSGLI
payment is $50,000, and at § 9.20(f)(13)
amputation of the big toe or the four
other toes, for which the TSGLI
payment is $25,000.
We are expanding both the hand and
foot scheduled losses because the TSGLI
Year-One Review Team found that there
have been cases of significant injuries
involving loss of part of a hand or foot
that did not qualify for payment under
the current TSGLI Schedule of Losses.
Year-One Review at 25. Currently, the
schedule provides a payment for loss of
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
an entire hand or foot or for loss of an
index finger and thumb of the same
hand. Interviews and medical research
indicated that amputations involving
four fingers on one hand, a thumb, four
toes on one foot, or a big toe required
at least short-term rehabilitation. Id.
Interviews with the branches of service
TSGLI administrative office staff, as
well as staff at National Naval Medical
Center, Walter Reed Army Medical
Center, and Brooke Army Medical
Center all documented the significance
of these losses. Id. The medical
literature affirms the key role that the
thumb and other fingers play in
activities of daily living that require
grasping and other fine motor skills. Id.
The toes function similarly in terms of
balance and propulsion for walking. Id.
Additionally, many AD&D policies in
the commercial sector now typically
include coverage for loss of fingers and
toes. Id.
We are adding limb salvage of an arm
or leg to the Schedule of Losses at
§ 9.20(f)(14) and (15) and defining the
term ‘‘ limb salvage’’ at § 9.20(e)(6)(xix)
as ‘‘a series of operations designed to
save an arm or leg with all of its
associated parts rather than amputate
it.’’ Eligibility for TSGLI based on
salvage of an arm or leg will require a
surgeon’s certification that the option of
amputation of the limb was a medically
justified alternative to salvage and that
the service member chose to pursue
salvage. The TSGLI payment for salvage
of an arm or leg is $50,000, the same
amount payable under the schedule for
loss of a hand or foot. According to the
Year-One Review, surgeons at the
National Naval Medical Center and
Brooke Army Medical Center stated that
limb salvage requires more significant
rehabilitation than an amputation. YearOne Review at 25–26. These medical
professionals also raised the issue that
providing a TSGLI payment for
amputations but not limb salvage could
create a monetary incentive that would
unintentionally encourage a service
member to proceed with amputation
rather than attempt to save the limb. Id.
By adding limb salvage as a covered
loss, the TSGLI program will obviate
this possibility and also recognize the
severity of the rehabilitation that
members undergo when they elect to
pursue limb salvage.
We are adding facial reconstruction to
the Schedule of Losses at § 9.20(f)(16).
Consultation with medical experts in
the field of oral and maxillofacial
surgery during the Year-One Review
indicated that 20–25 percent of all
injuries to members serving in
Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation
Iraqi Freedom occur to the head, face,
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
and neck. Year-One Review at 29. The
experts also opined that these injuries
are significantly more severe than in the
civilian world because they often result
in severe functional losses, including
impairment in areas such as eating,
breathing, digestion, vision, and
salivation that require significant
recovery and rehabilitation but do not
result in a loss of the member’s ability
to carry out activities of daily living that
would be covered in the current
Schedule of Losses. Id. New § 9.20(f)(16)
provides a graduated scale of payments
for facial reconstruction, starting at
$25,000, with a maximum payment of
$75,000. The amount of the payment for
facial reconstruction is based on the
location and severity of the injury. The
regulation, however, excludes TSGLI for
relatively minor injuries to the face,
such as the loss of the tip of the nose,
because TSGLI is intended for traumatic
injuries that require complex surgeries
and rehabilitation, as evidenced by the
losses prescribed at 38 U.S.C.
1980A(b)(1).
In § 9.20(e)(6)(xviii), we are defining
‘‘coma,’’ as used in § 9.20(f)(17) to mean
‘‘a state of profound unconsciousness
that is measured at a Glasgow Coma
Score of 8 or less.’’ The Glasgow Coma
Score is a neurological scale comprised
of the combined score on tests of a
patient’s eye, verbal, and motor
responses and ranges between 3
(indicating deep unconsciousness) and
15 (widely awake). https://www.unc.edu/
∼rowlett/units/scales/glasgow.htm. The
scale is applicable to acute medical and
trauma patients and is also used for
chronic conditions. https://
www.bt.cdc.gov/masscasualties/
gscale.asp. Use of the Glasgow Coma
Score will provide a reliable, objective
way of assessing the conscious state of
a service member.
We are adding to the schedule at
§ 9.20(f)(18) and (20) a $25,000 TSGLI
payment for hospitalization due to
traumatic brain injury (TBI) or other
traumatic injury (OTI) if the service
member’s TBI or OTI results in 15
consecutive days of inpatient
hospitalization, and we define
‘‘hospitalization’’ in § 9.20(e)(6)(xiii) to
mean an inpatient stay in a facility that
is: (1) Accredited by the Joint
Commission or its predecessor, the Joint
Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), or
accredited or approved by a program of
the qualified governmental unit in
which such institution is located if the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
has found that the accreditation or
comparable approval standards of such
qualified governmental unit are
essentially equivalent to those of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
Joint Commission or JCAHO; (2) used
primarily to provide, by or under the
supervision of physicians, to inpatients’
diagnostic services and therapeutic
services for medical diagnosis,
treatment, and care of injured, disabled,
or sick persons; (3) requires every
patient to be under the care and
supervision of a physician; and (4)
provides 24-hour nursing services
rendered or supervised by a registered
professional nurse and has a licensed
practical nurse or registered nurse on
duty at all times. The definition of
hospitalization also includes any Armed
Forces medical facility that is
authorized to provide inpatient and/or
ambulatory care to eligible service
members. The definition is intended to
exclude facilities that do not provide
traditional hospital-level care unless the
limitation on the level of care is a result
of military necessity. The requisite
consecutive 15-day hospitalization
period includes the dates on which the
member is transported from the injury
site to a facility described above,
admitted to the facility, transferred
between such facilities, and discharged
from the facility.
A service member is not entitled to
receive both a TSGLI payment for a 15day hospitalization due to TBI under
§ 9.20(f)(18) and a $25,000 TSGLI
payment for TBI that causes the
inability to perform at least two
activities of daily living under
§ 9.20(f)(17). Also, a service member is
not entitled to receive both a TSGLI
payment for a 15-day hospitalization
due to OTI under § 9.20(f)(20) and a
$25,000 payment for a traumatic injury
causing the inability to perform at least
two activities of daily living under
§ 9.20(f)(19).
By adding this loss, we will allow
injured service members whose inability
to perform activities of daily living
cannot be documented in the early
stages following their traumatic injury
to nonetheless establish the
consequences of the injury via easily
obtainable information regarding the
length of their hospital stay. We also
believe that establishing this scheduled
loss will result in more consistent
decisions and more rapid payments in
cases involving TBI. In considering the
Schedule of Losses award for TBI, we
considered not only the length of the
loss of the activities of daily living, but
the fact that there was an underlying
injury to the brain.
Hospitalization for 15 consecutive
days or more in today’s health care
environment generally indicates a rather
severe injury. Such a severe injury
usually requires the member’s family or
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71929
other caregivers to assist the member in
their recovery.
In 38 CFR 9.20(h)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii)
and (2) we refer to an ‘‘Application for
TSGLI Benefits Form,’’ rather than the
‘‘Certification of Traumatic Injury
Protection Form,’’ in order to conform to
the current name of the document. In 38
CFR 9.20(h)(1)(ii) we are adding ‘‘agent’’
in order to broaden the types of persons
who may receive a TSGLI payment on
behalf of a member, and we are
changing ‘‘attorney in fact’’ to
‘‘attorney.’’
We are amending 38 CFR 9.20(h)(1)(ii)
and 38 CFR 9.20(j) to implement 38
U.S.C. 1980A(k), which provides:
The Secretary [of the appropriate branch of
service], in consultation with the Secretary
[of Veterans Affairs], shall develop a process
for the designation of a fiduciary or trustee
of a member of the uniformed services who
is insured against traumatic injury under [the
TSGLI program]. The fiduciary or trustee so
designated would receive a payment for a
qualifying loss under [the TSGLI program] if
the member is medically incapacitated (as
determined pursuant to regulations
prescribed by the Secretary [of the
appropriate branch of service] in consultation
with the Secretary [of Veterans Affairs]) or
experiencing an extended loss of
consciousness.
Section 602 of title 37, United States
Code, authorizes the Secretary of a
military department to designate a
person to receive amounts due a
member ‘‘who is mentally incapable of
managing his affairs * * * without the
appointment in judicial proceedings of
a committee, guardian, or other legal
representative.’’ In § 9.20(j)(2) we are
adding a new paragraph that provides
that, if a member does not have a
guardian or agent (also known as
‘‘attorney-in-fact’’) who is authorized to
act as the member’s legal representative,
then a trustee appointed under 37
U.S.C. 602 may be authorized to receive
a TSGLI payment on behalf of the
member and is also obligated to render
a full accounting of any disbursements
made from the TSGLI benefit in
accordance with Department of Defense
regulations implementing section 602.
See 37 U.S.C. 603. In order to achieve
Congress’ obvious intent in enacting 38
U.S.C. 1980A(k) of providing TSGLI to
legally incapacitated service members
and their families who are entitled to
the payment as soon as possible, we are
amending 38 CFR 9.20(h)(1)(ii) to
provide that a military trustee may
apply for and receive TSGLI on behalf
of a legally incapacitated member.
Administrative Procedure Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs finds that there is good cause to
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
71930
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
dispense with the opportunity for prior
notice and opportunity for public
comment with respect to this rule,
which explains how the TSGLI program
will be amended. The Secretary finds
that it is impracticable to delay this
regulation for the purpose of soliciting
prior public comment because service
members and their families need the
payment provided by TSGLI as soon as
possible following a traumatic injury in
order to reduce the financial burden that
results from the severe losses covered by
the schedule. The amendments would
be applied retroactively for losses
previously not covered that result from
injuries that occurred on or after
October 1, 2001. As a result, we estimate
that approximately 1640 service
members who were not previously
eligible for TSGLI would now be
entitled to a payment under these
amended rules and are in need of these
payments as soon as possible. For these
reasons, the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs is issuing this rule as an interim
final rule. The Secretary of Veterans
Affairs will consider and address
comments that are received within 30
days of the date this interim final rule
is published in the Federal Register.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in an
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
given year. This rule would have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments or the private sector.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Paperwork Reduction Act
OMB assigns a control number for
each collection of information it
approves. Except for emergency
approvals under 44 U.S.C. 3507(j), VA
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. This interim final rule expands
the collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501–3521) (the Act). Accordingly,
under section 3507(d) of the Act, VA
will submit a copy of the amended
TSGLI form (titled Application for
TSGLI Benefits Form) to OMB for its
review of the collections of information
concurrent with the publication of this
interim final rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) unless OMB waives such review,
as any regulatory action that is likely to
result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have
been examined, and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory
action under the Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs
hereby certifies that this interim final
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. This interim
final rule will directly affect only
individuals and will not directly affect
small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this amendment is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number and Title
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Program number and title for
this regulation is 64.103, Life Insurance
for Veterans.
List of Subjects in Part 9
Life insurance, Military personnel,
Veterans.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Approved: October 10, 2008.
James B. Peake,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the Department of Veterans Affairs is
amending 38 CFR part 9 as follows:
■
PART 9—SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP
LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS’
GROUP LIFE INSURANCE
1. The authority citation for part 9 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965–1980A,
unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 9.1 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (b).
b. Removing paragraphs (k) through
(q).
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
■
§ 9.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The term administrative office
means the Office of Servicemembers’
Group Life Insurance, located at 80
Livingston Avenue, Roseland, New
Jersey 07068.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 9.20 is amended by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (b)(3).
■ b. Adding paragraph (d)(5).
■ c. Revising paragraphs (e)(3)(i)(C) and
(D).
■ d. Removing paragraph (e)(5)(ii) and
redesignating paragraph (e)(5)(iii) as
new paragraph (e)(5)(ii).
■ e. Revising paragraphs (e)(6)(i)
through (iii).
■ f Adding paragraphs (e)(6)(iv),
through (xx).
■ g. Removing paragraph (e)(7).
■ h. Redesignating paragraphs (f)
through (j) as (g) through (k),
respectively.
■ i. Adding new paragraph (f).
■ j. Revising newly designated
paragraph (h).
■ k. Revising newly designated
paragraph (j)(1).
■ l. Redesignating newly redesignated
paragraph (j)(2) as (j)(3) and adding a
new paragraph (j)(2).
■ m. Revising the authority citation.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 9.20
Traumatic injury protection.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) A traumatic event does not include
a medical or surgical procedure in and
of itself.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(5) You must suffer a traumatic injury
before midnight on the date of
termination of your duty status in the
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
uniformed services that established
eligibility for Servicemembers’ Group
Life Insurance. For purposes of this
section, the scheduled loss may occur
after the date of termination of your
duty status in the uniformed services
that established eligibility for
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance.
(e)* * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Diagnostic procedures, preventive
medical procedures such as
inoculations, medical or surgical
treatment for an illness or disease, or
any complications arising from such
procedures or treatment;
(D) Willful use of an illegal substance
or a controlled substance unless
administered or consumed on the
advice of a medical professional; or
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Definitions. For purposes of this
section—
(i) The term quadriplegia means the
complete and irreversible paralysis of
all four limbs.
(ii) The term paraplegia means the
complete and irreversible paralysis of
both lower limbs.
(iii) The term hemiplegia means the
complete and irreversible paralysis of
the upper and lower limbs on one side
of the body.
(iv) The term uniplegia means the
complete and irreversible paralysis of
one limb of the body.
(v) The term complete and irreversible
paralysis means total loss of voluntary
movement resulting from damage to the
spinal cord or associated nerves, or to
the brain, that is deemed clinically
stable and unlikely to improve.
(vi) The term inability to carry out
activities of daily living means the
inability to independently perform at
least two of the six following functions:
(A) Bathing.
(B) Continence.
(C) Dressing.
(D) Eating.
(E) Toileting.
(F) Transferring in or out of a bed or
chair with or without equipment.
(vii) The term pyogenic infection
means a pus-producing infection.
(viii) The term contaminated
substance means food or water made
unfit for consumption by humans
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
because of the presence of chemicals,
radioactive elements, bacteria, or
organisms.
(ix) The term chemical weapon means
chemical substances intended to kill,
seriously injure, or incapacitate humans
through their physiological effects.
(x) The term biological weapon means
biological agents or microorganisms
intended to kill, seriously injure, or
incapacitate humans through their
physiological effects.
(xi) The term radiological weapon
means radioactive materials or
radiation-producing devices intended to
kill, seriously injure, or incapacitate
humans through their physiological
effects.
(xii) The term medical professional
means a licensed practitioner of the
healing arts acting within the scope of
his or her practice. Some examples
include a licensed physician,
optometrist, nurse practitioner,
registered nurse, physician assistant, or
audiologist.
(xiii) The term hospitalization means
an inpatient stay in a facility that is:
(A)(1) Accredited by the Joint
Commission or its predecessor, the Joint
Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), or
accredited or approved by a program of
the qualified governmental unit in
which such institution is located if the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
has found that the accreditation or
comparable approval standards of such
qualified governmental unit are
essentially equivalent to those of the
Joint Commission or JCAHO;
(2) Used primarily to provide, by or
under the supervision of physicians, to
inpatients diagnostic services and
therapeutic services for medical
diagnosis, treatment, and care of
injured, disabled, or sick persons;
(3) Requires every patient to be under
the care and supervision of a physician;
and
(4) Provides 24-hour nursing services
rendered or supervised by a registered
professional nurse and has a licensed
practical nurse or registered nurse on
duty at all times; or
(B) Any Armed Forces medical
facility that is authorized to provide
inpatient and/or ambulatory care to
eligible service members.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71931
(xiv) The term total and permanent
loss of sight means:
(A) Visual acuity in the eye of 20/200
or less (worse) with corrective lenses
lasting at least 120 days;
(B) Visual acuity in the eye of greater
(better) than 20/200 with corrective
lenses and a visual field of 20 degrees
or less lasting at least 120 days; or
(C) Anatomical loss of the eye.
(xv) The term total and permanent
loss of speech means organic loss of
speech or the ability to express oneself,
both by voice and whisper, through
normal organs for speech,
notwithstanding the use of an artificial
appliance to simulate speech. Loss of
speech must be clinically stable and
unlikely to improve.
(xvi) The term total and permanent
loss of hearing means average hearing
threshold sensitivity for air conduction
of at least 80 decibels, based on hearing
acuity measured at 500, 1,000, and
2,000 Hertz, that is clinically stable and
unlikely to improve.
(xvii) The term burns means 2nd
degree (partial thickness) or worse burns
covering at least 20 percent of the body,
including the face and head, or 20
percent of the face alone. Percentage of
the body burned may be measured using
the Rule of Nines or any means
generally accepted within the medical
profession.
(xviii) The term coma means a state
of profound unconsciousness that is
measured at a Glasgow Coma Score of
8 or less.
(xix) The term limb salvage means a
series of operations designed to save an
arm or leg with all of its associated parts
rather than amputate it. For purposes of
this section, a surgeon must certify that
the option of amputation of the limb(s)
was a medically justified alternative to
salvage, and the patient chose to pursue
salvage.
(xx) The term amputation means the
severance or removal of a limb or part
of a limb resulting from trauma or
surgery. An amputation above a joint
means a severance or removal that is
closer to the body than the specified
joint is.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Schedule of Losses.
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
ER26NO08.009
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
71932
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
71933
ER26NO08.010
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(h) How does a member make a claim
for traumatic injury protection benefits?
(1)(i) A member who believes he or she
qualifies for traumatic injury protection
benefits must complete Part A of the
Application for TSGLI Benefits Form
and sign the form.
(ii) If a member is unable to sign the
Application for TSGLI Benefits Form
due to the member’s physical or mental
incapacity, the form must be signed by
the member’s guardian; if none, the
member’s agent or attorney acting under
a valid Power of Attorney; if none, the
member’s military trustee.
(iii) If a member suffered a scheduled
loss as a direct result of the traumatic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
injury, survived seven full days from the
date of the traumatic event, and then
died before the maximum benefit for
which the service member qualifies is
paid, the beneficiary or beneficiaries of
the member’s Servicemembers’ Group
Life Insurance policy should complete
an Application for TSGLI Benefits Form.
(2) If a member seeks traumatic injury
protection benefits for a scheduled loss
occurring after submission of a
completed Application for TSGLI
Benefits Form for a different scheduled
loss, the member must submit a
completed Application for TSGLI
Benefits Form for the new scheduled
loss and for each scheduled loss that
occurs thereafter and for each increment
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of a scheduled loss that occurs
thereafter. For example, if a member
seeks traumatic injury protection
benefits for a scheduled loss due to
coma from traumatic injury and/or the
inability to carry out activities of daily
living due to traumatic brain injury
(§ 9.20(f)(17)), or the inability to carry
out activities of daily living due to loss
directly resulting from a traumatic
injury other than an injury to the brain
(§ 9.20(f)(19)), a completed Application
for TSGLI Benefits Form must be
submitted for each increment of time for
which TSGLI is payable. Also, for
example, if a service member suffers a
scheduled loss due to a coma, a
completed Application for TSGLI
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
ER26NO08.011
71934
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Benefits Form should be filed after the
15th consecutive day that the member is
in the coma, for which $25,000 is
payable. If the member remains in a
coma for another 15 days, another
completed Application for TSGLI
Benefits Form should be submitted and
another $25,000 will be paid.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Who will be paid the traumatic
injury protection benefit? The injured
member who suffered a scheduled loss
will be paid the traumatic injury
protection benefit in accordance with
title 38 U.S.C. 1980A except under the
following circumstances:
(1) If a member is legally
incapacitated, the member’s guardian or
agent or attorney acting under a valid
Power of Attorney will be paid the
benefit on behalf of the member.
(2) If no guardian, agent, or attorney
is authorized to act as the member’s
legal representative, a military trustee
who has been appointed under the
authority of 37 U.S.C. 602 will be paid
the benefit on behalf of the member. The
military trustee will report the receipt of
the traumatic injury benefit payment
and any disbursements from that
payment to the Department of Defense.
*
*
*
*
*
(Authority: 37 U.S.C. 602, 603; 38 U.S.C.
501(a), 1980A)
[FR Doc. E8–28114 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket Nos. MC2009–6 and CP2009–7;
Order No. 138]
Administrative Practice and Procedure,
Postal Service
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Commission is adding
Express Mail & Priority Mail to the
Competitive Product List. This action is
consistent with changes in a recent law
governing postal operations and a recent
Postal Service request. Republication of
the lists of market dominant and
competitive products is also consistent
with new requirements in the law.
DATES: Effective November 26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory
History, 73 FR 66077 (November 6,
2008).
The Postal Service seeks to add a new
product identified as Express Mail &
Priority Mail Contract 1 to the
Competitive Product List. For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission approves the Request.
I. Background
On October 27, 2008, the Postal
Service filed a formal request pursuant
to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30
et seq. to add Express Mail & Priority
Mail Contract 1 to the Competitive
Product List.1 The Postal Service asserts
that the Express Mail & Priority Mail
Contract 1 product is a competitive
product ‘‘not of general applicability’’
within the meaning of 39 U.S.C.
3632(b)(3). This Request has been
assigned Docket No. MC2009–6.
The Postal Service
contemporaneously filed a contract
related to the proposed new product
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39
CFR 3015.5. The contract has been
assigned Docket No. CP2009–7.
In support of its Request, the Postal
Service filed the following materials: (1)
A redacted version of the Governors’
Decision authorizing the new product
which also includes an analysis of
Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 1
and certification of the Governors’
vote; 2 (2) a redacted version of the
contract which, among other things,
provides that the contract will expire 3
years from the effective date, which is
proposed to be 1 day after the
Commission issues all regulatory
approvals; 3 (3) requested changes in the
Mail Classification Schedule product
list; 4 (4) a Statement of Supporting
Justification as required by 39 CFR
3020.32; 5 and (5) certification of
compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a).6
In the Statement of Supporting
Justification, Kim Parks, Manager, Sales
and Communications, Expedited
Shipping, asserts that the service to be
provided under the contract will cover
its attributable costs, make a positive
contribution to coverage of institutional
costs, and will increase contribution
toward the requisite 5.5 percent of the
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Add Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract 1 to
Competitive Product List and Notice of
Establishment of Rates and Class Not of General
Applicability, October 27, 2008 (Request).
2 Attachment A to the Request. The analysis that
accompanies the Governors’ Decision notes, among
other things, that the contract is not risk free, but
concludes that the risks are manageable.
3 Attachment B to the Request.
4 Attachment C to the Request.
5 Attachment D to the Request.
6 Attachment E to the Request.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71935
Postal Service’s total institutional costs.
Request, Attachment D, at 1. W. Ashley
Lyons, Manager, Corporate Financial
Planning, Finance Department, certifies
that the contract complies with 39
U.S.C. 3633(a). See id. Attachment E.
The Postal Service filed much of the
supporting materials, including the
unredacted Governors’ Decision and the
unredacted Express Mail & Priority Mail
contract, under seal. In its Request, the
Postal Service maintains that the
contract and related financial
information, including the customer’s
name and the accompanying analyses
that provide prices, terms, conditions,
and financial projections, should remain
confidential. Id. at 2–3.
In Order No. 125, the Commission
gave notice of the two dockets,
appointed a public representative, and
provided the public with an opportunity
to comment.7 The Postal Service filed
supplemental materials on November
19, 2008.8
II. Comments
Comments were filed by the Public
Representative.9 No filings were
submitted by other interested parties.
The Public Representative Comments
focus principally on the adequacy of
cost coverage, appropriate classification
of the product, and overall
transparency.10 Public Representative
Comments at 2–3.
The Public Representative does not
see a substantial risk for this particular
contract, but does raise concerns
regarding mailing profiles that he says
warrant close attention when evaluating
this and similar agreements.11 The
Public Representative believes that the
proposed Express Mail & Priority Mail
Contract 1 product is appropriately
classified as competitive. After
reviewing the cost savings measures
underlying this contract, the Public
Representative determines that the
7 PRC Order No. 125, Notice and Order
Concerning Express Mail & Priority Mail Contract
1 Negotiated Service Agreement, October 31, 2008
(Order No. 125).
8 United States Postal Service Notice of Filing
Under Seal of Additional Information Regarding
Financial Analysis, November 19, 2008.
9 Public Representative Comments in Response to
Order No. 125, November 10, 2008 (Public
Representative Comments).
10 With respect to transparency, the Public
Representative concludes that ‘‘[t]he Postal Service
should be commended for proceeding diligently
toward accommodating transparency concerns.’’ Id.
at 10.
11 Id. at 3–4. The specific areas of concern
identified by the Public Representative are whether
mailer-specific projected volumes are sufficiently
reliable, whether cost impacts of mailer-specific
shape and weight profiles are sufficiently
acknowledged, whether seasonal effects are taken
into account, and whether package density has been
considered. Id. at 7–9.
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 26, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71926-71935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28114]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 9
RIN 2900-AN00
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Traumatic Injury Protection
Program
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is issuing this
interim final rule to amend the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance
traumatic injury protection program (TSGLI) regulations in order to add
losses that would be covered under the program and to define terms
relevant to these new losses. This rulemaking also clarifies language
in and reorganizes existing provisions.
DATES: This interim final rule is effective November 26, 2008. Comments
must be received on or before December 26, 2008.
Applicability Date: VA will apply this rule to injuries incurred in
Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom on or after
October 7, 2001, through and including November 30, 2005, and to all
qualifying injuries incurred on or after December 1, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulations
Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave.,
NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273-9026.
Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN
2900-AN00.'' Copies of comments received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room
1063B, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
(except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. (This
is not a toll-free number.) In addition, during the comment period,
comments are available online through the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) at https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanne King, Attorney-Advisor,
Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office and Insurance Center
(310/290B), P.O. Box 8079, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101, (215) 842-
2000, ext. 4839. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TSGLI was established by Congress in May
2005 to provide monetary assistance to severely injured service members
who suffer a loss, such as the loss of a hand, as a direct result of a
serious traumatic injury in order to help the member and the member's
family through an often long and arduous treatment and rehabilitation
period. VA codified regulations to implement TSGLI at 38 CFR 9.1(k)-(q)
and 9.20. See 70 FR 75940 (Dec. 22, 2005); 72 FR 10362 (Mar. 8, 2007).
VA conducted an extensive review of the TSGLI program at the end of
the first year of the program's operation (``Year-One Review'') to
ensure that the program was operating effectively and that it was
meeting the intent of Congress. The report was published on the VA Web
site on July 17, 2008. https://www.insurance.va.gov/miscellaneous/
index.htm. Many of the amendments made by this interim final rule,
particularly the losses that we propose to add to the Schedule of
Losses in Sec. 9.20, are derived from the recommendations and findings
of the TSGLI Year-One Review.
Congress has expressed its intent to provide TSGLI benefits
retroactively. Section 1032(c)(1) of the ``Emergency Supplemental
Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami
Relief, 2005,'' Public Law 109-13, which established the TSGLI program
effective December 1, 2005, also provided for the payment of TSGLI
benefits to service members who experienced a traumatic injury between
October 7, 2001, when Operation Enduring Freedom began, and December 1,
2005, the effective date of section 1032 of Public Law 109-13, if the
loss was a direct result of injuries incurred in Operation Enduring
Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom. VA as well has made its regulations
implementing the TSGLI program retroactive. In 2007, VA applied changes
to the TSGLI program made by the Veterans' Housing Opportunity and
Benefits Improvement Act of 2006, Public Law 109-233, section
501(a)(3), 120 Stat. 397, 413, to claims filed or injuries suffered
prior to the date of the change in the law because it was consistent
with the objectives of the TSGLI provisions authorizing payments based
on injuries preceding the program's creation. 72 FR 10362, 10363
(2007). We believe that the same holds true with regard to the changes
made by this rulemaking. Further, because TSGLI is intended to provide
a source of income for expenses during periods of treatment and
convalescence following a loss due to traumatic injury, we believe the
application of these regulations is more directly connected to those
persistent circumstances than to the past date on which an injury or
loss was incurred or a claim was filed. Id. We also note that these
regulatory amendments would not have affected conduct prior to the date
of publication, nor would the regulations upset any settled
expectations in any meaningful way. See Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.,
511 U.S. 244, 280 (1994); Princess Cruises, Inc. v. United States, 397
F.3d 1358, 1362-63 (Fed. Cir. 2005). The service member's traumatic
injury, the scheduled loss due to the injury, and the resulting
economic burdens on the service member were not within any party's
control and obviously actions were not taken in reliance on prior
regulations. Although application of the regulations will increase the
Government's economic burden, we believe the additional burden is
countered in this instance by the other considerations discussed above.
We are amending 38 CFR 9.1(b) to provide the current address of the
Office of Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (OSGLI), which is 80
Livingston Avenue, Roseland, New Jersey 07068.
We are moving the definitions from 38 CFR 9.1(k)-(q), which pertain
only to TSGLI, to 38 CFR 9.20(e)(6)(vi)-(xii) for purposes of
administrative convenience and to make it easier for the public to
locate the rules. We are expanding the definition of ``medical
professional'' at Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(xii) to include a ``licensed
practitioner of the healing arts acting within the scope of his or her
practice.'' We have broadened the definition in order to encompass a
wider range of licensed medical professionals who are qualified to
certify eligibility for TSGLI.
We are revising 38 CFR 9.20(b)(3) to state that the term
``traumatic event'' does not include a medical procedure or a surgical
procedure in and of itself. Current Sec. 9.20(b)(3) only refers to a
surgical procedure. The revision makes the regulation consistent with
VA's current practice of not providing TSGLI payments for an injury
that directly results from either a medical or surgical procedure. The
publication of this revision to the current rule will not result in any
deviation from already established guidelines or processes. Further,
the revised definition is consistent with current 38 CFR
9.20(e)(3)(i)(C), which excludes payment for a scheduled loss due to a
[[Page 71927]]
traumatic injury caused by either medical treatment or surgical
treatment of an illness or disease.
We are adding a new paragraph at the end of 38 CFR 9.20(d) with
regard to the eligibility requirements for a TSGLI payment. The
governing statute for the TSGLI program, 38 U.S.C. 1980A(h), states
that ``[c]overage for loss resulting from traumatic injury provided
under this section shall cease at midnight on the date of the
termination of the member's duty status in the uniformed services that
established eligibility for Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance.'' New
Sec. 9.20(d)(5) specifies that a member would be covered by TSGLI if
the member has a traumatic injury prior to midnight on the date of
termination, even if the member's scheduled loss does not occur until
after the member's termination date. We are making this revision to the
regulation because in some cases there is a long period between the
date of a member's traumatic injury and the date on which the scheduled
loss actually occurs. For example, a member who suffers a severe leg
injury from an explosion in service may not undergo amputation of the
leg until after separating from service. This amendment to Sec.
9.20(d) would clarify that, under such circumstances, the member would
be eligible for TSGLI.
Currently, 38 CFR 9.20(e)(3)(i)(C) provides that TSGLI is not
payable if a traumatic injury is caused by medical or surgical
treatment of an illness or disease. We are revising that paragraph to
explain that TSGLI also is not payable if a traumatic injury is caused
by diagnostic procedures or any complications arising from such
procedures or from medical or surgical treatment for an illness or
disease. The commercial industry's Accidental Death and Dismemberment
(AD&D) policies provide a model for the TSGLI program. 70 FR 75940.
Under commercial AD&D policies, neither diagnostic complications nor
post-surgical complications due to medical or surgical treatment
usually constitute a covered loss. We are therefore revising Sec.
9.20(d)(5) to make it consistent with commercial policies. We are also
revising Sec. 9.20(e)(3)(i)(C) to explain that TSGLI is not payable if
a traumatic injury is caused by preventive medical procedures such as
inoculations.
We are amending 38 CFR 9.20(e)(3)(i)(D), which currently excludes
payment of TSGLI for a scheduled loss due to a traumatic injury caused
by willful use of a controlled substance unless administered or
consumed on the advice of a ``medical doctor.'' We are deleting the
term ``medical doctor'' and inserting in its place ``medical
professional,'' because prescriptions for controlled substances may be
dispensed by a caregiver other than a medical doctor (e.g., a nurse
practitioner). This revision will clarify that a member who receives a
lawful controlled substance from a medical professional who is legally
authorized to provide such a controlled substance will be eligible for
a TSGLI payment. Also, use of the term ``medical professional'' is
consistent with the terminology in the TSGLI procedural guide, https://
www.insurance.va.gov/sgliSite/TSGLI/TSGLI.htm, and the TSGLI
application form.
We are amending 38 CFR 9.20(e)(6) to correct a misstatement
concerning the scope of its application. Current 38 CFR 9.20(e)(6)
states that the definitions apply ``[f]or purposes of this paragraph
(e)(6)--.'' We have corrected this to read, ``For purposes of this
section--.''
We also are adding to Sec. 9.20(e)(6) definitions of terms
relevant to qualifying losses under the existing TSGLI Schedule of
Losses and to other losses that we are adding to that schedule in this
rulemaking. Because of the interrelated nature of the definitions and
schedule losses, we will discuss the definitions in conjunction with
the relevant amendments for each loss.
In the Schedule of Losses, we are making several non-substantive
changes that will make it easier to use. These non-substantive changes
include moving the schedule from Sec. 9.20(e)(7) to Sec. 9.20(f) and
replacing the Roman numerals preceding each loss with Arabic numerals.
Another non-substantive change involves the types of losses listed in
the schedule. The current schedule lists both single losses (e.g.,
total and permanent loss of speech) and combinations of losses (e.g.,
total and permanent loss of speech and loss of thumb and index finger
on the same hand). We are removing all losses involving a combination
of losses and instead explain how the different individual losses may
be combined for purposes of calculating the TSGLI benefit that is
payable. For losses listed in paragraphs (f)(1) through (18) of Sec.
9.20, payment may be made for multiple losses resulting from a single
traumatic event (except where noted otherwise); however, the total
payment amount may not exceed $100,000 for losses resulting from a
single traumatic event. Payments for losses listed in paragraphs
(f)(19) through (20) of Sec. 9.20 may not be made in addition to
payments for losses under paragraphs (f)(1) through (18)--only the
higher amount will be paid. The total payment amount may not exceed
$100,000 for multiple losses resulting from a single traumatic event.
Payment for total and permanent loss of sight is required by 38
U.S.C. 1980A(b)(1)(A). In Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(xiv), consistent with
current VA practice, we are defining ``total and permanent loss of
sight,'' which is included in the Schedule of Losses at Sec.
9.20(f)(1), as: (1) Visual acuity in the eye of 20/200 or less (worse)
with corrective lenses lasting at least 120 days; (2) visual acuity in
the eye of greater than 20/200 with corrective lenses and a visual
field of 20 degrees or less lasting at least 120 days; or (3)
anatomical loss of the eye. These visual-acuity standards are similar
to the eligibility criteria for automobiles and adaptive equipment for
certain disabled veterans, 38 U.S.C. 3901(1)(A)(iii), and to the
definition of ``blindness'' for purposes of Social Security disability
benefits. 42 U.S.C. 1382c(2).
We are incorporating the temporal requirement of ``at least 120
days'' in the definition of ``permanent and total loss of sight'' for
the benefit of medical professionals who are responsible for certifying
TSGLI eligibility of an injured service member. Staff members at the
branches of service who process TSGLI claims reported for purposes of
the Year-One Review that medical professionals were sometimes unwilling
to certify that loss of sight was ``permanent,'' even when the loss of
sight had already existed for a rather lengthy period of time and even
when it required substantial rehabilitation on the part of the member,
because the member might regain some sight due to surgery (e.g.,
corneal transplants) at a later date. Year-One Review at 24.
We are combining the losses for total and permanent loss of hearing
in one ear and both ears at 38 CFR 9.20(f)(2). We are defining the term
``total and permanent loss of hearing'' at 38 CFR 9.20(e)(6)(xvi) to
mean average hearing threshold sensitivity for air conduction of at
least 80 decibels that is clinically stable and unlikely to improve and
based upon hearing measured at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hertz. According to
the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, a hearing loss is
considered ``profound'' if it measures at 80 decibels. https://
www.asha.org/public/hearing/testing/assess.htm. We are adding this
definition to provide an objective standard for determining whether a
hearing loss is total and permanent for purposes of TSGLI.
In Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(xv), we are defining the term ``total and
permanent loss of speech,'' used in Sec. 9.20(f)(3), as ``organic loss
of speech or the ability to express oneself, both by voice and whisper,
[[Page 71928]]
through normal organs for speech, notwithstanding the use of an
artificial appliance to simulate speech.'' The loss of speech must be
clinically stable and unlikely to improve in order to be compensable.
We are adding this objective definition to assist the medical
professionals who evaluate injured service members for purposes of
entitlement to TSGLI.
We are adding uniplegia as a qualifying loss for TSGLI at Sec.
9.20(f)(7) and defining ``uniplegia'' at 38 CFR 9.20(e)(6)(iv) as ``the
complete and irreversible paralysis of one limb of the body.'' The
Year-One Review states that research shows that the impact of
rehabilitation and recovery for uniplegia is similar to the
rehabilitation and recovery from severance of a hand or foot, which
Congress included as a scheduled loss under 38 U.S.C. 1980A(b)(1)(B).
Year-One Review at 24. The AD&D policies of the commercial sector, upon
which TSGLI was modeled, also often cover uniplegia. We are therefore
including uniplegia as a scheduled loss for purposes of TSGLI. Because
uniplegia involves paralysis of one limb only, and is therefore less
severe a loss than paralysis that involves more than one limb, and
because of the reported similar effect of the amputation of one hand or
foot, the payment for this loss is $50,000, which is the amount of
TSGLI payable for amputation of one hand or one foot. However, we note
in the Schedule that a payment for uniplegia cannot be combined with
the payments for amputation or limb salvage, as the initial payment for
the uniplegia loss provides payment to the service member during the
rehabilitation period.
We are adding a definition of ``complete and irreversible
paralysis'' to aid in understanding the definitions of quadriplegia,
paraplegia, hemiplegia, and uniplegia. ``Complete and irreversible
paralysis'' is defined in Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(v) as total loss of
voluntary movement resulting from damage to the spinal cord or
associated nerves, or to the brain, that is deemed clinically stable
and unlikely to improve.
In Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(xvii) and (f)(8), we are expanding TSGLI
coverage from third degree or worse burns covering at least 30 percent
of the body or 30 percent of the face to second degree or worse burns
covering at least 20 percent of a service member's body or at least 20
percent of the face. Although 38 U.S.C. 1980A(b)(1)(G) states that the
Schedule of Losses prescribed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs must
include ``[b]urns greater than second degree, covering 30 percent of
the body or 30 percent of the face,'' the statute also authorizes the
Secretary of Veterans Affairs to prescribe additional losses by
regulation. We therefore believe that VA has authority to add other
kinds of burns to the TSGLI Schedule of Losses.
Second degree burns, also called partial thickness burns, are less
severe than third degree burns, also called full thickness burns.
Nevertheless, burn specialists at Brooke Army Medical Center and VA
physicians indicated that a second degree burn to at least 20 percent
of the face or body would be considered to be a severe burn. Year-One
Review at 26. They also reported that patients with second degree burns
require as much rehabilitation as those with third degree burns. Id. We
are therefore providing a TSGLI payment of $100,000 for second degree
burns or worse covering at least 20 percent of the body or at least 20
percent of the face. The definition of burns in Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(xvii)
states explicitly that the body includes the face and head. The
percentage of the body burned will be determined by using the Rule of
Nines, which is a chart dividing the body surface into areas, each of
which represents 9 percent, or another method for estimating the extent
of a member's burns that is generally accepted within the medical
profession.
We are replacing the phrase ``loss of'' hand or foot in the
schedule with ``amputation of,'' and we define ``amputation'' in Sec.
9.20(e)(6)(xx) to mean ``severance or removal of a limb or part of a
limb resulting from trauma or surgery.'' We also explain that, ``[a]n
amputation above a joint means a severance or removal that is closer to
the body than the specified joint is.'' (Emphasis added.)
TSGLI coverage under the schedule will be expanded with respect to
amputation of part of a limb. For amputation of part of the hand, we
are adding at Sec. 9.20(f)(10) amputation of the thumb or the other
four fingers at or above the metacarpophalangeal joint, for which
$50,000 in TSGLI is payable. For amputation of part of the foot, we are
adding at Sec. 9.20(f)(12) amputation at or above the
metatarsophalangeal joints of all toes on one foot, for which the TSGLI
payment is $50,000, and at Sec. 9.20(f)(13) amputation of the big toe
or the four other toes, for which the TSGLI payment is $25,000.
We are expanding both the hand and foot scheduled losses because
the TSGLI Year-One Review Team found that there have been cases of
significant injuries involving loss of part of a hand or foot that did
not qualify for payment under the current TSGLI Schedule of Losses.
Year-One Review at 25. Currently, the schedule provides a payment for
loss of an entire hand or foot or for loss of an index finger and thumb
of the same hand. Interviews and medical research indicated that
amputations involving four fingers on one hand, a thumb, four toes on
one foot, or a big toe required at least short-term rehabilitation. Id.
Interviews with the branches of service TSGLI administrative office
staff, as well as staff at National Naval Medical Center, Walter Reed
Army Medical Center, and Brooke Army Medical Center all documented the
significance of these losses. Id. The medical literature affirms the
key role that the thumb and other fingers play in activities of daily
living that require grasping and other fine motor skills. Id. The toes
function similarly in terms of balance and propulsion for walking. Id.
Additionally, many AD&D policies in the commercial sector now typically
include coverage for loss of fingers and toes. Id.
We are adding limb salvage of an arm or leg to the Schedule of
Losses at Sec. 9.20(f)(14) and (15) and defining the term `` limb
salvage'' at Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(xix) as ``a series of operations designed
to save an arm or leg with all of its associated parts rather than
amputate it.'' Eligibility for TSGLI based on salvage of an arm or leg
will require a surgeon's certification that the option of amputation of
the limb was a medically justified alternative to salvage and that the
service member chose to pursue salvage. The TSGLI payment for salvage
of an arm or leg is $50,000, the same amount payable under the schedule
for loss of a hand or foot. According to the Year-One Review, surgeons
at the National Naval Medical Center and Brooke Army Medical Center
stated that limb salvage requires more significant rehabilitation than
an amputation. Year-One Review at 25-26. These medical professionals
also raised the issue that providing a TSGLI payment for amputations
but not limb salvage could create a monetary incentive that would
unintentionally encourage a service member to proceed with amputation
rather than attempt to save the limb. Id. By adding limb salvage as a
covered loss, the TSGLI program will obviate this possibility and also
recognize the severity of the rehabilitation that members undergo when
they elect to pursue limb salvage.
We are adding facial reconstruction to the Schedule of Losses at
Sec. 9.20(f)(16). Consultation with medical experts in the field of
oral and maxillofacial surgery during the Year-One Review indicated
that 20-25 percent of all injuries to members serving in Operation
Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom occur to the head, face,
[[Page 71929]]
and neck. Year-One Review at 29. The experts also opined that these
injuries are significantly more severe than in the civilian world
because they often result in severe functional losses, including
impairment in areas such as eating, breathing, digestion, vision, and
salivation that require significant recovery and rehabilitation but do
not result in a loss of the member's ability to carry out activities of
daily living that would be covered in the current Schedule of Losses.
Id. New Sec. 9.20(f)(16) provides a graduated scale of payments for
facial reconstruction, starting at $25,000, with a maximum payment of
$75,000. The amount of the payment for facial reconstruction is based
on the location and severity of the injury. The regulation, however,
excludes TSGLI for relatively minor injuries to the face, such as the
loss of the tip of the nose, because TSGLI is intended for traumatic
injuries that require complex surgeries and rehabilitation, as
evidenced by the losses prescribed at 38 U.S.C. 1980A(b)(1).
In Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(xviii), we are defining ``coma,'' as used in
Sec. 9.20(f)(17) to mean ``a state of profound unconsciousness that is
measured at a Glasgow Coma Score of 8 or less.'' The Glasgow Coma Score
is a neurological scale comprised of the combined score on tests of a
patient's eye, verbal, and motor responses and ranges between 3
(indicating deep unconsciousness) and 15 (widely awake). https://
www.unc.edu/~rowlett/units/scales/glasgow.htm. The scale is applicable
to acute medical and trauma patients and is also used for chronic
conditions. https://www.bt.cdc.gov/masscasualties/gscale.asp. Use of the
Glasgow Coma Score will provide a reliable, objective way of assessing
the conscious state of a service member.
We are adding to the schedule at Sec. 9.20(f)(18) and (20) a
$25,000 TSGLI payment for hospitalization due to traumatic brain injury
(TBI) or other traumatic injury (OTI) if the service member's TBI or
OTI results in 15 consecutive days of inpatient hospitalization, and we
define ``hospitalization'' in Sec. 9.20(e)(6)(xiii) to mean an
inpatient stay in a facility that is: (1) Accredited by the Joint
Commission or its predecessor, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), or accredited or approved by a
program of the qualified governmental unit in which such institution is
located if the Secretary of Health and Human Services has found that
the accreditation or comparable approval standards of such qualified
governmental unit are essentially equivalent to those of the Joint
Commission or JCAHO; (2) used primarily to provide, by or under the
supervision of physicians, to inpatients' diagnostic services and
therapeutic services for medical diagnosis, treatment, and care of
injured, disabled, or sick persons; (3) requires every patient to be
under the care and supervision of a physician; and (4) provides 24-hour
nursing services rendered or supervised by a registered professional
nurse and has a licensed practical nurse or registered nurse on duty at
all times. The definition of hospitalization also includes any Armed
Forces medical facility that is authorized to provide inpatient and/or
ambulatory care to eligible service members. The definition is intended
to exclude facilities that do not provide traditional hospital-level
care unless the limitation on the level of care is a result of military
necessity. The requisite consecutive 15-day hospitalization period
includes the dates on which the member is transported from the injury
site to a facility described above, admitted to the facility,
transferred between such facilities, and discharged from the facility.
A service member is not entitled to receive both a TSGLI payment
for a 15-day hospitalization due to TBI under Sec. 9.20(f)(18) and a
$25,000 TSGLI payment for TBI that causes the inability to perform at
least two activities of daily living under Sec. 9.20(f)(17). Also, a
service member is not entitled to receive both a TSGLI payment for a
15-day hospitalization due to OTI under Sec. 9.20(f)(20) and a $25,000
payment for a traumatic injury causing the inability to perform at
least two activities of daily living under Sec. 9.20(f)(19).
By adding this loss, we will allow injured service members whose
inability to perform activities of daily living cannot be documented in
the early stages following their traumatic injury to nonetheless
establish the consequences of the injury via easily obtainable
information regarding the length of their hospital stay. We also
believe that establishing this scheduled loss will result in more
consistent decisions and more rapid payments in cases involving TBI. In
considering the Schedule of Losses award for TBI, we considered not
only the length of the loss of the activities of daily living, but the
fact that there was an underlying injury to the brain.
Hospitalization for 15 consecutive days or more in today's health
care environment generally indicates a rather severe injury. Such a
severe injury usually requires the member's family or other caregivers
to assist the member in their recovery.
In 38 CFR 9.20(h)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) and (2) we refer to an
``Application for TSGLI Benefits Form,'' rather than the
``Certification of Traumatic Injury Protection Form,'' in order to
conform to the current name of the document. In 38 CFR 9.20(h)(1)(ii)
we are adding ``agent'' in order to broaden the types of persons who
may receive a TSGLI payment on behalf of a member, and we are changing
``attorney in fact'' to ``attorney.''
We are amending 38 CFR 9.20(h)(1)(ii) and 38 CFR 9.20(j) to
implement 38 U.S.C. 1980A(k), which provides:
The Secretary [of the appropriate branch of service], in
consultation with the Secretary [of Veterans Affairs], shall develop
a process for the designation of a fiduciary or trustee of a member
of the uniformed services who is insured against traumatic injury
under [the TSGLI program]. The fiduciary or trustee so designated
would receive a payment for a qualifying loss under [the TSGLI
program] if the member is medically incapacitated (as determined
pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Secretary [of the
appropriate branch of service] in consultation with the Secretary
[of Veterans Affairs]) or experiencing an extended loss of
consciousness.
Section 602 of title 37, United States Code, authorizes the Secretary
of a military department to designate a person to receive amounts due a
member ``who is mentally incapable of managing his affairs * * *
without the appointment in judicial proceedings of a committee,
guardian, or other legal representative.'' In Sec. 9.20(j)(2) we are
adding a new paragraph that provides that, if a member does not have a
guardian or agent (also known as ``attorney-in-fact'') who is
authorized to act as the member's legal representative, then a trustee
appointed under 37 U.S.C. 602 may be authorized to receive a TSGLI
payment on behalf of the member and is also obligated to render a full
accounting of any disbursements made from the TSGLI benefit in
accordance with Department of Defense regulations implementing section
602. See 37 U.S.C. 603. In order to achieve Congress' obvious intent in
enacting 38 U.S.C. 1980A(k) of providing TSGLI to legally incapacitated
service members and their families who are entitled to the payment as
soon as possible, we are amending 38 CFR 9.20(h)(1)(ii) to provide that
a military trustee may apply for and receive TSGLI on behalf of a
legally incapacitated member.
Administrative Procedure Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), the Secretary of Veterans
Affairs finds that there is good cause to
[[Page 71930]]
dispense with the opportunity for prior notice and opportunity for
public comment with respect to this rule, which explains how the TSGLI
program will be amended. The Secretary finds that it is impracticable
to delay this regulation for the purpose of soliciting prior public
comment because service members and their families need the payment
provided by TSGLI as soon as possible following a traumatic injury in
order to reduce the financial burden that results from the severe
losses covered by the schedule. The amendments would be applied
retroactively for losses previously not covered that result from
injuries that occurred on or after October 1, 2001. As a result, we
estimate that approximately 1640 service members who were not
previously eligible for TSGLI would now be entitled to a payment under
these amended rules and are in need of these payments as soon as
possible. For these reasons, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs is
issuing this rule as an interim final rule. The Secretary of Veterans
Affairs will consider and address comments that are received within 30
days of the date this interim final rule is published in the Federal
Register.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any given year. This rule would have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments or the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
OMB assigns a control number for each collection of information it
approves. Except for emergency approvals under 44 U.S.C. 3507(j), VA
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. This interim final rule expands the collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521)
(the Act). Accordingly, under section 3507(d) of the Act, VA will
submit a copy of the amended TSGLI form (titled Application for TSGLI
Benefits Form) to OMB for its review of the collections of information
concurrent with the publication of this interim final rule.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such
review, as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule
that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter
the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this proposed rule have been examined, and it has been
determined to be a significant regulatory action under the Executive
Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs hereby certifies that this
interim final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as they are defined in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. This interim final
rule will directly affect only individuals and will not directly affect
small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this amendment
is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number and Title
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program number and title
for this regulation is 64.103, Life Insurance for Veterans.
List of Subjects in Part 9
Life insurance, Military personnel, Veterans.
Approved: October 10, 2008.
James B. Peake,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs is amending 38 CFR part 9 as follows:
PART 9--SERVICEMEMBERS' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS' GROUP
LIFE INSURANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965-1980A, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Section 9.1 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b).
0
b. Removing paragraphs (k) through (q).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 9.1 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) The term administrative office means the Office of
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance, located at 80 Livingston Avenue,
Roseland, New Jersey 07068.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 9.20 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b)(3).
0
b. Adding paragraph (d)(5).
0
c. Revising paragraphs (e)(3)(i)(C) and (D).
0
d. Removing paragraph (e)(5)(ii) and redesignating paragraph
(e)(5)(iii) as new paragraph (e)(5)(ii).
0
e. Revising paragraphs (e)(6)(i) through (iii).
0
f Adding paragraphs (e)(6)(iv), through (xx).
0
g. Removing paragraph (e)(7).
0
h. Redesignating paragraphs (f) through (j) as (g) through (k),
respectively.
0
i. Adding new paragraph (f).
0
j. Revising newly designated paragraph (h).
0
k. Revising newly designated paragraph (j)(1).
0
l. Redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (j)(2) as (j)(3) and
adding a new paragraph (j)(2).
0
m. Revising the authority citation.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 9.20 Traumatic injury protection.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) A traumatic event does not include a medical or surgical
procedure in and of itself.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(5) You must suffer a traumatic injury before midnight on the date
of termination of your duty status in the
[[Page 71931]]
uniformed services that established eligibility for Servicemembers'
Group Life Insurance. For purposes of this section, the scheduled loss
may occur after the date of termination of your duty status in the
uniformed services that established eligibility for Servicemembers'
Group Life Insurance.
(e)* * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Diagnostic procedures, preventive medical procedures such as
inoculations, medical or surgical treatment for an illness or disease,
or any complications arising from such procedures or treatment;
(D) Willful use of an illegal substance or a controlled substance
unless administered or consumed on the advice of a medical
professional; or
* * * * *
(6) Definitions. For purposes of this section--
(i) The term quadriplegia means the complete and irreversible
paralysis of all four limbs.
(ii) The term paraplegia means the complete and irreversible
paralysis of both lower limbs.
(iii) The term hemiplegia means the complete and irreversible
paralysis of the upper and lower limbs on one side of the body.
(iv) The term uniplegia means the complete and irreversible
paralysis of one limb of the body.
(v) The term complete and irreversible paralysis means total loss
of voluntary movement resulting from damage to the spinal cord or
associated nerves, or to the brain, that is deemed clinically stable
and unlikely to improve.
(vi) The term inability to carry out activities of daily living
means the inability to independently perform at least two of the six
following functions:
(A) Bathing.
(B) Continence.
(C) Dressing.
(D) Eating.
(E) Toileting.
(F) Transferring in or out of a bed or chair with or without
equipment.
(vii) The term pyogenic infection means a pus-producing infection.
(viii) The term contaminated substance means food or water made
unfit for consumption by humans because of the presence of chemicals,
radioactive elements, bacteria, or organisms.
(ix) The term chemical weapon means chemical substances intended to
kill, seriously injure, or incapacitate humans through their
physiological effects.
(x) The term biological weapon means biological agents or
microorganisms intended to kill, seriously injure, or incapacitate
humans through their physiological effects.
(xi) The term radiological weapon means radioactive materials or
radiation-producing devices intended to kill, seriously injure, or
incapacitate humans through their physiological effects.
(xii) The term medical professional means a licensed practitioner
of the healing arts acting within the scope of his or her practice.
Some examples include a licensed physician, optometrist, nurse
practitioner, registered nurse, physician assistant, or audiologist.
(xiii) The term hospitalization means an inpatient stay in a
facility that is:
(A)(1) Accredited by the Joint Commission or its predecessor, the
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO),
or accredited or approved by a program of the qualified governmental
unit in which such institution is located if the Secretary of Health
and Human Services has found that the accreditation or comparable
approval standards of such qualified governmental unit are essentially
equivalent to those of the Joint Commission or JCAHO;
(2) Used primarily to provide, by or under the supervision of
physicians, to inpatients diagnostic services and therapeutic services
for medical diagnosis, treatment, and care of injured, disabled, or
sick persons;
(3) Requires every patient to be under the care and supervision of
a physician; and
(4) Provides 24-hour nursing services rendered or supervised by a
registered professional nurse and has a licensed practical nurse or
registered nurse on duty at all times; or
(B) Any Armed Forces medical facility that is authorized to provide
inpatient and/or ambulatory care to eligible service members.
(xiv) The term total and permanent loss of sight means:
(A) Visual acuity in the eye of 20/200 or less (worse) with
corrective lenses lasting at least 120 days;
(B) Visual acuity in the eye of greater (better) than 20/200 with
corrective lenses and a visual field of 20 degrees or less lasting at
least 120 days; or
(C) Anatomical loss of the eye.
(xv) The term total and permanent loss of speech means organic loss
of speech or the ability to express oneself, both by voice and whisper,
through normal organs for speech, notwithstanding the use of an
artificial appliance to simulate speech. Loss of speech must be
clinically stable and unlikely to improve.
(xvi) The term total and permanent loss of hearing means average
hearing threshold sensitivity for air conduction of at least 80
decibels, based on hearing acuity measured at 500, 1,000, and 2,000
Hertz, that is clinically stable and unlikely to improve.
(xvii) The term burns means 2nd degree (partial thickness) or worse
burns covering at least 20 percent of the body, including the face and
head, or 20 percent of the face alone. Percentage of the body burned
may be measured using the Rule of Nines or any means generally accepted
within the medical profession.
(xviii) The term coma means a state of profound unconsciousness
that is measured at a Glasgow Coma Score of 8 or less.
(xix) The term limb salvage means a series of operations designed
to save an arm or leg with all of its associated parts rather than
amputate it. For purposes of this section, a surgeon must certify that
the option of amputation of the limb(s) was a medically justified
alternative to salvage, and the patient chose to pursue salvage.
(xx) The term amputation means the severance or removal of a limb
or part of a limb resulting from trauma or surgery. An amputation above
a joint means a severance or removal that is closer to the body than
the specified joint is.
* * * * *
(f) Schedule of Losses.
[[Page 71932]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR26NO08.009
[[Page 71933]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR26NO08.010
[[Page 71934]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR26NO08.011
* * * * *
(h) How does a member make a claim for traumatic injury protection
benefits? (1)(i) A member who believes he or she qualifies for
traumatic injury protection benefits must complete Part A of the
Application for TSGLI Benefits Form and sign the form.
(ii) If a member is unable to sign the Application for TSGLI
Benefits Form due to the member's physical or mental incapacity, the
form must be signed by the member's guardian; if none, the member's
agent or attorney acting under a valid Power of Attorney; if none, the
member's military trustee.
(iii) If a member suffered a scheduled loss as a direct result of
the traumatic injury, survived seven full days from the date of the
traumatic event, and then died before the maximum benefit for which the
service member qualifies is paid, the beneficiary or beneficiaries of
the member's Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance policy should
complete an Application for TSGLI Benefits Form.
(2) If a member seeks traumatic injury protection benefits for a
scheduled loss occurring after submission of a completed Application
for TSGLI Benefits Form for a different scheduled loss, the member must
submit a completed Application for TSGLI Benefits Form for the new
scheduled loss and for each scheduled loss that occurs thereafter and
for each increment of a scheduled loss that occurs thereafter. For
example, if a member seeks traumatic injury protection benefits for a
scheduled loss due to coma from traumatic injury and/or the inability
to carry out activities of daily living due to traumatic brain injury
(Sec. 9.20(f)(17)), or the inability to carry out activities of daily
living due to loss directly resulting from a traumatic injury other
than an injury to the brain (Sec. 9.20(f)(19)), a completed
Application for TSGLI Benefits Form must be submitted for each
increment of time for which TSGLI is payable. Also, for example, if a
service member suffers a scheduled loss due to a coma, a completed
Application for TSGLI
[[Page 71935]]
Benefits Form should be filed after the 15th consecutive day that the
member is in the coma, for which $25,000 is payable. If the member
remains in a coma for another 15 days, another completed Application
for TSGLI Benefits Form should be submitted and another $25,000 will be
paid.
* * * * *
(j) Who will be paid the traumatic injury protection benefit? The
injured member who suffered a scheduled loss will be paid the traumatic
injury protection benefit in accordance with title 38 U.S.C. 1980A
except under the following circumstances:
(1) If a member is legally incapacitated, the member's guardian or
agent or attorney acting under a valid Power of Attorney will be paid
the benefit on behalf of the member.
(2) If no guardian, agent, or attorney is authorized to act as the
member's legal representative, a military trustee who has been
appointed under the authority of 37 U.S.C. 602 will be paid the benefit
on behalf of the member. The military trustee will report the receipt
of the traumatic injury benefit payment and any disbursements from that
payment to the Department of Defense.
* * * * *
(Authority: 37 U.S.C. 602, 603; 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 1980A)
[FR Doc. E8-28114 Filed 11-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P