The Low-Income Definition, 71909-71913 [E8-28076]
Download as PDF
71909
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 229
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 701 and 705
RIN 3133–AC98
The Low-Income Definition
AGENCY: National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending the
definition of ‘‘low-income members’’ to
use median family income (MFI) to
determine if a credit union qualifies for
a low-income designation and eligible
for assistance from the Community
Development Revolving Loan Fund
(CDRLF). The amendment will
eliminate the confusion associated with
adjusting median household income in
metropolitan areas with higher costs of
living. Additionally, it will better align
NCUA criteria for a low-income credit
union (LICU) designation with the
criteria for the addition of an
underserved area to a federal credit
union (FCU) field of membership and
certification as a Community
Development Financial Institution
(CDFI).
DATES: The rule is effective January 1,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Moisette Green, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314–3428, or
telephone: (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Background
The Federal Credit Union Act (Act)
authorizes the NCUA Board (Board) to
define ‘‘low-income members’’ so that
credit unions with a membership
consisting of predominantly low-income
members can benefit from certain
statutory relief and receive assistance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
from the CDRLF. 12 U.S.C. 1752(5),
1757a(b)(2)(A), 1757a(c)(2)(B), 1772c–1.
NCUA currently defines ‘‘low-income
members’’ in parts 701 and 705 of its
regulations generally as meaning
members whose annual household
income falls at or below 80% of the
national median household income and
provides a differential for certain
geographic areas with higher costs of
living. 12 CFR 701.34(a)(2), 705.3(a)(1).
Federally insured, state-chartered credit
unions (FISCUs) may also receive a
LICU designation if they meet the
qualifications in § 701.34(a); state
regulators make or remove the
designation on the basis provided in
§ 701.34(a) with the concurrence of the
appropriate NCUA regional director. 12
CFR 741.204(b). Therefore, references in
this preamble to FCUs includes FISCUs
to the extent that state law permits a
LICU designation and permits FISCUs
with the LICU designation to accept
nonmember accounts and secondary
capital as contemplated by NCUA
regulations. 12 CFR 741.204(b)–(d).
In April 2008, NCUA proposed
revising the definition of ‘‘low-income
members’’ in §§ 701.34(a)(2) and
705.3(a)(1) to base the determination on
MFI or median earnings for individuals
instead of median household income. 73
FR 22836 (April 28, 2008). For
metropolitan areas, the proposal defined
‘‘low-income members’’ as those living
in a geographic area where the income
is at or below 80% of either the
metropolitan area or national
metropolitan area income standard,
whichever is greater. For members
living outside a metropolitan area, the
proposal defined low-income members
as those living in a geographic area
where the income is at or below 80% of
either the statewide, non-metropolitan
area or national, non-metropolitan area
median family income, whichever is
greater. The proposed rule also
contained grandfather provisions and
appeal procedures for FCUs that no
longer qualify for a LICU designation.
Comments
NCUA received comments from three
credit unions, six trade associations,
and one individual. Of those who
commented on the rule generally, all but
one supported using the MFI standard.
Eight commenters had additional
suggestions. One commenter suggested
NCUA should ensure LICUs are actually
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
serving low-income members instead of
changing the low-income rule.
Three commenters suggested
clarifying the rule so that members who
do not live in a low-income area, but are
low-income, are included in the
definition of ‘‘low-income members.’’
As discussed below, the final rule
provides that NCUA will estimate
member earnings based on data from the
U.S. Census Bureau about the
geographical area where members live,
but permits FCUs to present actual
member income information, for
example, from loan applications or a
survey.
One commenter stated it was unclear
from which sources NCUA would
obtain the MFI and median earnings for
individuals and questioned the
reliability of Census Bureau data. The
final rule includes the Web site address
for the Census Bureau where the data is
available. The American FactFinder on
the Census Bureau’s webpage, https://
factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/
main.html?_lang=en, provides statistics
and data from the decennial census and
other annual surveys. Decennial census
statistics for MFI are currently recorded
in table P77 for each geographic area,
and table P85 records the median
earnings for individuals. The Census
Bureau also collects information on the
U.S. population, employment, and
housing annually through the American
Community Survey (ACS). MFI statistics
collected through the ACS are reported
in table B19113. Table B20002 records
median earnings for individuals. NCUA
will use the decennial census or ACS
data, whichever is most beneficial to an
FCU, when determining whether it
qualifies for a LICU designation. When
ACS data is not available for a
geographic area, decennial census data
will be used. Regarding the reliability of
the data, the Census Bureau is charged
with collecting information on the U.S.
population, employment, and housing.
See 13 U.S.C. 41. The final rule better
aligns the low-income definition with
the criteria for underserved areas and
CDFIs, which rely on data from the
Census Bureau. 12 U.S.C. 1759(c)(2); 12
CFR 1805.201. Therefore, the Board
believes the Census Bureau is the
appropriate source for data about MFI
and median earnings for individuals.
Three commenters recommended
NCUA develop a process to permit
FCUs to qualify using other criteria,
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
71910
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
such as unemployment rates. In line
with its statutory authority to designate
low-income credit unions, the Board
believes the criteria should be based on
income. 12 U.S.C. 1752(5),
1757a(b)(2)(A), 1757a(c)(2)(b).
Additionally, the Board notes the
parallel relationship between member
income and unemployment rates.
Two commenters were concerned the
rule would require credit unions to
reapply for the LICU designation
annually and stated NCUA should assist
CUs to obtain the data necessary to
qualify as a LICU. As explained below,
under the final rule, credit unions are
not required to apply for a LICU
designation. Instead, based on data
obtained through examinations, a
regional director will notify an FCU that
it qualifies for a low-income
designation, and FCUs that accept the
designation will continue to have the
designation, without any need to reapply, as long as they meet the rule’s
criteria.
Five commenters stated NCUA should
permit current LICUs to maintain the
designation permanently and only apply
the new rule to new LICU designations.
One commenter suggested the five-year
grandfather period is insufficient
because secondary capital investments
are usually for a seven-to ten-year term.
The Board does not believe the LICU
designation should be permanent
because LICUs need to continue to be
serving low-income members to fulfill
the Act’s intent. Nevertheless, the Board
appreciates the need for transition
periods. Current LICUs that do not meet
the criteria of the final rule or those that
lose the designation after initially
qualifying will not immediately lose
their designation. They will have five
years to meet the LICU criteria or
otherwise comply with the Act and
NCUA regulations. The final rule also
permits a regional director to extend the
adjustment period when an FCU has
secondary capital or nonmember
deposit accounts with a maturity
beyond the five-year grandfather
provision.
One commenter was concerned there
may be unintended adverse
consequences if the rule is finalized and
suggested NCUA monitor the rule’s
effect on LICUs. NCUA staff has
analyzed the impact the final rule will
have on current LICUs and potential
designees and determined more FCUs
will likely qualify for the low-income
designation under this final rule than
under the current rule. Further, with the
possible exception of one or two FCUs,
the Board does not anticipate the final
rule will adversely affect current LICUs.
Additionally, this commenter stated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
LICUs losing the designation because of
the change in income standard should
have the right to appeal the removal to
the Board. An FCU may appeal to the
Board a regional director’s
determination that it no longer meets
the criteria for a LICU designation, but
not the loss of the LICU designation
because of the change in the income
standard.
One commenter raised a concern that
the rule does not adequately address
LICUs that are not geographically based,
e.g., single common bond CUs, multiple
common bond CUs. Under the final
rule, FCUs can qualify for a LICU
designation under the new procedure
regardless of their charter type.
A commenter suggested NCUA
consult with state supervisory
authorities on implications of the
regulation. The final rule does not
change the state supervisory authorities’
procedures for designating LICUs.
Another commenter suggested NCUA
coordinate this rule with recently
proposed amendments to NCUA’s
Chartering and Field of Membership
Manual regarding underserved areas to
ensure consistency and facilitate
outreach to underserved areas and lowincome members. 73 FR 34366 (June 17,
2008). As explained in the preamble to
the proposed rule, NCUA is amending
the low-income definition to, among
other reasons, better align NCUA criteria
for a low-income designation with the
criteria for the addition of an
underserved area to an FCU field of
membership and certification as a CDFI.
See 73 FR 22836 (April 28, 2008).
Under the current rule, NCUA uses
median household income to determine
if a credit union qualifies for the LICU
designation, and this is inconsistent
with the field of membership (FOM)
provisions and criteria for CDFI
certification. Multiple common-bond
FCUs may add an underserved area to
their FOMs if, among other
requirements, the area meets the
definition of an ‘‘investment area,’’ as
defined in § 103(16) of the Community
Development Banking and Financial
Institutions Act of 1994. 12 U.S.C.
1759(c)(2)(A)(i); NCUA Chartering and
Field of Membership Manual, Chapter 3,
II.A., Interpretive Rulings and Policy
Statement (IRPS) 03–1, 68 FR 18334
(April 15, 2003) (as amended by IRPS
06–1, 71 FR 36667 (June 28, 2006)).
Treasury Department regulations,
implementing the Community
Development Banking and Financial
Institution Act of 1994, include an MFI
at or below 80 percent of the MFI for
corresponding metropolitan area as a
factor supporting the determination that
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
an area is an investment area. 12 CFR
1805.201(b).
Additionally, The Treasury
Department’s CDFI Fund, through
monetary awards and other benefits,
helps promote access to capital and
local economic growth in urban and
rural low-income communities across
the nation. Qualifying credit unions
obtain assistance from the CDFI Fund to
offer financial services to and further
economic development of low-income
members. The CDFI Fund uses MFI to
implement the Community
Development Banking and Financial
Institutions Act of 1994, as described
above.
The use of MFI as a standard to
determine low-income status will bring
uniformity and consistency to the
regulations, and should eliminate
industry confusion regarding the lowincome designation and application for
an underserved area. Additionally,
because credit unions may apply for
financial assistance from the CDFI
Fund, the Board believes it would be
beneficial to align the low-income
formula with the CDFI Fund criteria.
This would reduce the regulatory
burden on credit unions attempting to
qualify for the advantages of receiving a
LICU designation and benefits from the
CDFI Fund.
Two commenters suggested the Board
should expand the rule to enable more
FCUs to serve low-income and
underserved people. As noted above,
the final rule will likely allow more
FCUs to obtain the low-income
designation. The Board notes the rule
does not limit service to low-income or
underserved people, and all FCUs are
encouraged to serve low-income and
underserved people within their
applicable fields of membership,
regardless of whether they receive a
LICU designation.
The Final Rule
In order for an FCU to qualify as a
LICU, a majority of its actual members
must meet the definition of ‘‘lowincome members.’’ The final rule
amends the definition of low-income
members and clarifies the procedures
for designating an FCU as a LICU and
removing the designation.
Under the final rule, low-income
members are those who earn 80% of the
metropolitan area MFI or less. NCUA
will make the determination of whether
a majority of an FCU’s members are lowincome based on data it obtains during
the examination process. This will
involve linking member address
information to publicly available
information from the U.S. Census
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Bureau to estimate member earnings.1
Using automated, geo-coding software,
NCUA will use member street addresses
collected during FCU examinations to
determine the geographic area 2 and
metropolitan area 3 for each member
account. NCUA will then use income
information for the geographic area from
the Census Bureau and assign estimated
earnings to each member. Using this
method, if a majority of an FCU’s
members have estimated earnings equal
to or less than 80% of the MFI for the
metropolitan area, the FCU will qualify
for a LICU designation.
To ensure all eligible FCUs qualify for
the LICU designation under the new
procedure, median earnings for
individuals may be substituted for MFI,
and non-metropolitan area MFI data
will be used when a member lives
outside a metropolitan area. NCUA
recognizes this approach means
different MFI levels will apply in
different parts of the country. This
approach recognizes the concept of lowincome as related to the cost of living
and salaries in geographic areas. The
Census Bureau, however, provides
national statistics in addition by
geographical areas and, to ameliorate
potential disparity among geographic
areas, the rule provides an FCU will also
qualify for a LICU designation if a
majority of its members are considered
low-income when compared to the
national metropolitan MFI.
The rule also provides an alternative
basis for an FCU to qualify for a LICU
designation. An FCU may be able to
demonstrate the actual income of its
members based on data it has, for
example, from loan applications or
surveys of its members. An FCU may
qualify as a LICU if it can establish a
1 Using Census Bureau reports, NCUA can obtain
income information for various types of geographic
areas, including a ‘‘census block.’’ A census block
is the smallest geographic area for which the Census
Bureau collects and tabulates decennial census data
and is an area bounded on all sides by visible
features, such as streets, roads, streams, and
railroad tracks, and by invisible boundaries, such as
city, town, township, and county limits, property
lines, and short, imaginary extensions of streets and
roads. A census block may be the size of a city
block, or many square miles of territory in rural
areas.
2 A ‘‘geographic area’’ is any State, the District of
Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern
Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or
any territory of the United States or a geographic
unit that is a county or equivalent area, a unit of
a local government, incorporated place, census
tract, census block, Zip Code Tabulation Area,
block group, or Native American, American Indian,
or Alaskan Native area, as such units are defined
or reported by the U.S. Census Bureau.
3 A ‘‘metropolitan area’’ is an area designated by
the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to
31 U.S.C. 1104(d), 44 U.S.C. 3504(c), and Executive
Order 10253, 16 FR 5605 (June 13, 1951) (as
amended).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
majority of its members meet the lowincome formula. For example, an FCU
with 1,000 members may be able to
show the actual income of 501 or more
of its members is equal to or less than
80% of the MFI for the metropolitan
area(s) where they live. As a practical
matter, the Board thinks few FCUs will
need this option because NCUA’s
approach of matching member
residential information with Census
Bureau income information will provide
an estimate very close to members’
actual income.
The proposed rule stated that a
regional director ‘‘will designate’’ an
FCU as a LICU ‘‘if a majority of its
membership qualifies as low-income
members’’ but did not indicate how an
FCU would be informed of the
designation, how an FCU would
indicate that it wanted the designation,
or whether an FCU could refuse the
designation. The final rule clarifies that
a regional director will notify an FCU
that it qualifies, and an FCU will then
have 30 days to notify the regional
director that it wants to receive the
designation. Thus, the final rule permits
an FCU to refuse a low-income
designation simply by opting not to
notify the regional director that it wants
to receive the designation. The final rule
does not require state supervisory
authorities to change the process or
procedures they currently use for
FISCUs to receive the LICU designation
from state regulators.
Additionally, the final rule clarifies
the process for removing a low-income
designation. If a regional director
determines an FCU no longer meets the
criteria for the LICU designation, the
regional director will notify the FCU in
writing. The FCU will have five years
after the date of the notice to either
requalify as a LICU or come into
compliance with regulations applicable
to credit unions that do not have a lowincome designation. If an FCU does not
requalify and has secondary capital or
nonmember deposit accounts with a
maturity that extends beyond the fiveyear adjustment period, a regional
director may give the credit union
additional time to satisfy the terms of
any account agreements.
An FCU may appeal to the Board a
regional director’s determination that it
no longer meets the criteria for the LICU
designation. The rule states an appeal
must be filed within 60 days of the date
of the regional director’s notice. An FCU
will submit its appeal through the
appropriate regional office. On appeal,
the Board will determine whether the
regional director correctly applied the
regulatory criteria. An FCU may not,
however, appeal the loss of the LICU
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71911
designation to the Board solely because
of the change in the income standard in
this rule.
In addition to streamlining the
proposed rule based on the comments,
the final rule also revised some of the
provisions in the proposal for clarity.
The proposed rule noted, with a crossreference to § 701.32, that LICUs may
receive shares from nonmembers. The
final rule has eliminated this statement
as unnecessary. The proposed rule also
defined the term ‘‘geographic areas’’ and
defined low-income members in terms
of meeting the MFI criteria on the basis
of earnings or the geographic areas
where members live. The final rule has
deleted the definition of geographic
areas as unnecessary. As proposed, the
alternatives of earning or residence
were, in effect, redundant. As provided
in the final rule, the LICU designation
is based on calculating members’
estimated earnings based on where they
live, using data from the Census Bureau,
and defining geographic areas in the
rule is unnecessary as this is part of the
data available from the Census Bureau.
Finally, the final rule makes a
conforming amendment to § 705.3 and
clarifies that FCUs qualifying for the
low-income designation under § 701.34
may apply for assistance from the
CDRLF. Part 705 and § 701.34 continue
to apply to state-chartered credit unions
in accordance with § 741.204. As stated
above, there is no change in the process
or procedures for FISCUs.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact any regulation may have on a
substantial number of small entities. 5
U.S.C. 603(a). For purposes of this
analysis, NCUA considers credit unions
having under $10 million in assets small
entities. Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement 03–2, 68 FR 31949 (May 29,
2003). As of December 31, 2007, out of
approximately 8,410 federally insured
credit unions, 3,599 had less than $10
million in assets.
This final rule directly affects all lowincome credit unions, of which there are
approximately 1,087. NCUA estimates
approximately 692 low-income credit
unions are small entities. Therefore,
NCUA has determined this final rule
will have an impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
NCUA has determined, however, the
economic impact on entities affected by
the final rule will not be significant. The
rule aligns criteria for a low-income
designation with the criteria for the
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
71912
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
addition of an underserved area to a
federal credit union field of membership
under Interpretive Rulings and Policy
Statement (IRPS) 03–1, 68 FR 18334
(April 15, 2003) (as amended by IRPS
06–1, 71 FR 36667 (June 28, 2006)) and
certification as a CDFI. The final rule
establishes one income standard for
determining a low-income designation,
underserved areas, and investment
areas. It also eliminates the confusion
within the credit union industry due to
the use of different income standards.
NCUA believes the final rule reduces
the regulatory burden for LICUs and
minimizes any economic impact.
Additionally, the final rule contains a
five-year period for affected LICUs to
make necessary operational
adjustments. Accordingly, the Board
certifies this rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996, Public Law 104–121, provides
generally for congressional review of
agency rules. A reporting requirement is
triggered in instances where NCUA
issues a final rule as defined by Section
551 of the Administrative Procedures
Act. 5 U.S.C. 551. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, an
office within OMB, has determined that,
for purposes of SBREFA, this is not a
major rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq., NCUA may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, an information collection
unless it displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The final rule
now provides for FCUs, once they are
notified that they qualify for the lowincome designation, to notify the
appropriate regional director that they
wish to accept the designation.
Although, in the past, FCUs have
requested the designation from regional
offices, the regulation did not address
application procedures. The final rule,
like the proposed, provides that NCUA
will make the determination without
requiring FCUs to apply. As FCUs will,
however, be required to notify regional
directors that they wish to accept the
designation, NCUA believes this
notification is a ‘‘collection of
information’’ within the meaning of
section 3502(3) of the PRA.
Additionally, FCUs that do not receive
notification from the regional director
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
but believe they qualify for the LICU
designation may submit information to
demonstrate they meet the criteria.
NCUA believes this voluntary
submission is also an information
collection. NCUA has submitted the
requirements of the information
collections contained in the final rule to
OMB for review and approval under
section 3507 of the PRA and § 1320.11
of OMB’s implementing regulations. 5
CFR 1320.11. OMB approval is pending.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles,
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive
order. The final rule will not have
substantial direct effect on the states, on
the connection between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined this final rule does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
NCUA has determined that this final
rule will not affect family well-being
within the meaning of section 654 of the
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law
105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions, Federal credit unions,
Low income, Nonmember deposits,
Secondary capital, Shares.
12 CFR Part 705
Community development, Credit
unions, Loans, Low income, Technical
assistance.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board, on November 20,
2008.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons stated above, NCUA
amends 12 CFR parts 701 and 705 as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 701—ORGANIZATION AND
OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT
UNIONS
1. The authority for part 701
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1757, 1765,
1766, 1781, 1782, 1787, 1789; Title V,
Pub. L. 109–351, 120 Stat. 1966.
2. Amend § 701.34 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 701.34 Designation of low-income
status; Acceptance of secondary capital
accounts by low-income designated credit
unions.
(a) Designation of low-income status.
(1) Based on data obtained through
examinations, a regional director will
notify a federal credit union that it
qualifies for designation as a lowincome credit union if a majority of its
membership qualifies as low-income
members. A federal credit union that
wishes to receive the designation will
notify the regional director in writing
within 30 days of receipt of the regional
director’s notification.
(2) Low-income members are those
members who earn 80% or less than the
median family income for the
metropolitan area where they live or
national metropolitan area, whichever is
greater. A regional director may use
total median earnings for individuals
instead of median family income if it is
more beneficial to a federal credit union
when determining if the credit union
qualifies for a low-income credit union
designation. A regional director will use
the statewide or national, nonmetropolitan area median family
income instead of the metropolitan area
or national metropolitan area median
family income for members living
outside a metropolitan area. Member
earnings will be estimated based on data
reported by the U.S. Census Bureau for
the geographic area where the member
lives. The term ‘‘low-income members’’
also includes those members enrolled as
students in a college, university, high
school, or vocational school.
(3) Federal credit unions that do not
receive notification that they qualify for
a low-income credit union designation
but believe they qualify may submit
information to the regional director to
demonstrate they qualify for a lowincome credit union designation. For
example, federal credit unions may
provide actual member income from
loan applications or surveys to
demonstrate a majority of their
membership is low-income members.
(4) If the regional director determines
a low-income designated federal credit
union no longer meets the criteria for
the designation, the regional director
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
will notify the federal credit union in
writing, and the federal credit union
must, within five years, meet the criteria
for the designation or come into
compliance with the regulatory
requirements applicable to federal credit
unions that do not have a low-income
designation. The designation will
remain in effect during the five-year
period. If a federal credit union does not
requalify and has secondary capital or
nonmember deposit accounts with a
maturity beyond the five-year period, a
regional director may extend the time
for a federal credit union to come into
compliance with regulatory
requirements to allow the federal credit
union to satisfy the terms of any account
agreements. A federal credit union may
appeal a regional director’s
determination that the credit union no
longer meets the criteria for a lowincome designation to the Board within
60 days of the date of the notice from
the regional director. An appeal must be
submitted through the regional director.
(5) Any credit union with a lowincome credit union designation on
January 1, 2009 will have five years
from that date to meet the criteria for
low-income designation under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, unless
the regional director determines a longer
time is required to allow the lowincome credit union to satisfy the terms
of a secondary capital or nonmember
deposit account agreement.
(6) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
Median family income and total
median earnings for individuals are
income statistics reported by the U.S.
Census Bureau. The applicable income
data can be obtained via the American
FactFinder on the Census Bureau’s
webpage at https://factfinder.census.gov/
home/saff/main.html?_lang=en.
Metropolitan area means an area
designated by the Office of Management
and Budget pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
1104(d), 44 U.S.C. 3504(c), and
Executive Order 10253, 16 FR 5605
(June 13, 1951) (as amended).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 705—COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT REVOLVING LOAN
FUND FOR CREDIT UNIONS
3. The authority for part 705
continues to read as follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1772c–1; 42 U.S.C.
9822 and 9822 note.
4. Amend § 705.3 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:53 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
§ 705.3
Definitions.
(a) The term ‘‘low-income members’’
means those members defined in
§ 701.34 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–28076 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM396 Special Conditions No.
25–376–SC]
Special Conditions: Boeing Model 767–
300 and –300F Series Airplanes;
Interaction of Systems and Structures
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
SUMMARY: These special conditions are
issued for the Boeing Model 767–300
and –300F airplane as modified by
Aviation Partners Boeing Supplemental
Type Certificate (STC). The modified
airplane has novel or unusual design
features involving installation of
blended winglets and a speedbrake
wing-load-alleviation system. This
system reduces loading on the wing.
The applicable airworthiness
regulations for the Boeing Model 767–
300 and –300F do not contain adequate
or appropriate safety standards for
systems which alleviate loads on
structures. These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
applicable airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is November 14,
2008. We must receive your comments
by January 12, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposal
may be mailed in duplicate to: Federal
Aviation Administration, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Attention: Rules
Docket (ANM–113), Docket No. NM396,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; or delivered in
duplicate to the Transport Airplane
Directorate at the above address. All
comments must be marked Docket No.
NM396. Comments may be inspected in
the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian
Won, FAA, Airframe & Cabin Safety
Branch, ANM–115, Transport Airplane
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71913
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone (425) 227–2145; facsimile
(425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA has determined that notice
and opportunity for prior public
comment is impracticable because these
procedures would significantly delay
certification of the airplane and thus
delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public-comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. The FAA therefore finds that
good cause exists for making these
special conditions effective upon
issuance; however, the FAA invites
interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the special conditions,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning these special conditions.
The docket is available for public
inspection before and after the comment
closing date. If you wish to review the
docket in person, go to the address in
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
We consider all comments we receive
on or before the closing date for
comments. We consider comments filed
late if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. We may
change these special conditions based
on the comments we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of your comments on these
special conditions, include with your
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the docket number
appears. We will stamp the date on the
postcard and mail it back to you.
Background
On February 21, 2007, Aviation
Partners Boeing, Seattle, WA, applied
for an STC to modify Boeing Model
767–300 and –300F series airplanes.
These models are currently approved
under Type Certificate No. A1NM. The
Boeing Model 767–300 and 767–300F
series airplanes are large transportcategory airplanes. The Model 767–300
airplane is powered by either two Pratt
E:\FR\FM\26NOR1.SGM
26NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 26, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71909-71913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28076]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 71909]]
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Parts 701 and 705
RIN 3133-AC98
The Low-Income Definition
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending the definition of ``low-income members'' to
use median family income (MFI) to determine if a credit union qualifies
for a low-income designation and eligible for assistance from the
Community Development Revolving Loan Fund (CDRLF). The amendment will
eliminate the confusion associated with adjusting median household
income in metropolitan areas with higher costs of living. Additionally,
it will better align NCUA criteria for a low-income credit union (LICU)
designation with the criteria for the addition of an underserved area
to a federal credit union (FCU) field of membership and certification
as a Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI).
DATES: The rule is effective January 1, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moisette Green, Staff Attorney, Office
of General Counsel, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, or telephone: (703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Credit Union Act (Act) authorizes the NCUA Board
(Board) to define ``low-income members'' so that credit unions with a
membership consisting of predominantly low-income members can benefit
from certain statutory relief and receive assistance from the CDRLF. 12
U.S.C. 1752(5), 1757a(b)(2)(A), 1757a(c)(2)(B), 1772c-1. NCUA currently
defines ``low-income members'' in parts 701 and 705 of its regulations
generally as meaning members whose annual household income falls at or
below 80% of the national median household income and provides a
differential for certain geographic areas with higher costs of living.
12 CFR 701.34(a)(2), 705.3(a)(1). Federally insured, state-chartered
credit unions (FISCUs) may also receive a LICU designation if they meet
the qualifications in Sec. 701.34(a); state regulators make or remove
the designation on the basis provided in Sec. 701.34(a) with the
concurrence of the appropriate NCUA regional director. 12 CFR
741.204(b). Therefore, references in this preamble to FCUs includes
FISCUs to the extent that state law permits a LICU designation and
permits FISCUs with the LICU designation to accept nonmember accounts
and secondary capital as contemplated by NCUA regulations. 12 CFR
741.204(b)-(d).
In April 2008, NCUA proposed revising the definition of ``low-
income members'' in Sec. Sec. 701.34(a)(2) and 705.3(a)(1) to base the
determination on MFI or median earnings for individuals instead of
median household income. 73 FR 22836 (April 28, 2008). For metropolitan
areas, the proposal defined ``low-income members'' as those living in a
geographic area where the income is at or below 80% of either the
metropolitan area or national metropolitan area income standard,
whichever is greater. For members living outside a metropolitan area,
the proposal defined low-income members as those living in a geographic
area where the income is at or below 80% of either the statewide, non-
metropolitan area or national, non-metropolitan area median family
income, whichever is greater. The proposed rule also contained
grandfather provisions and appeal procedures for FCUs that no longer
qualify for a LICU designation.
Comments
NCUA received comments from three credit unions, six trade
associations, and one individual. Of those who commented on the rule
generally, all but one supported using the MFI standard. Eight
commenters had additional suggestions. One commenter suggested NCUA
should ensure LICUs are actually serving low-income members instead of
changing the low-income rule.
Three commenters suggested clarifying the rule so that members who
do not live in a low-income area, but are low-income, are included in
the definition of ``low-income members.'' As discussed below, the final
rule provides that NCUA will estimate member earnings based on data
from the U.S. Census Bureau about the geographical area where members
live, but permits FCUs to present actual member income information, for
example, from loan applications or a survey.
One commenter stated it was unclear from which sources NCUA would
obtain the MFI and median earnings for individuals and questioned the
reliability of Census Bureau data. The final rule includes the Web site
address for the Census Bureau where the data is available. The American
FactFinder on the Census Bureau's webpage, https://
factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en, provides
statistics and data from the decennial census and other annual surveys.
Decennial census statistics for MFI are currently recorded in table P77
for each geographic area, and table P85 records the median earnings for
individuals. The Census Bureau also collects information on the U.S.
population, employment, and housing annually through the American
Community Survey (ACS). MFI statistics collected through the ACS are
reported in table B19113. Table B20002 records median earnings for
individuals. NCUA will use the decennial census or ACS data, whichever
is most beneficial to an FCU, when determining whether it qualifies for
a LICU designation. When ACS data is not available for a geographic
area, decennial census data will be used. Regarding the reliability of
the data, the Census Bureau is charged with collecting information on
the U.S. population, employment, and housing. See 13 U.S.C. 41. The
final rule better aligns the low-income definition with the criteria
for underserved areas and CDFIs, which rely on data from the Census
Bureau. 12 U.S.C. 1759(c)(2); 12 CFR 1805.201. Therefore, the Board
believes the Census Bureau is the appropriate source for data about MFI
and median earnings for individuals.
Three commenters recommended NCUA develop a process to permit FCUs
to qualify using other criteria,
[[Page 71910]]
such as unemployment rates. In line with its statutory authority to
designate low-income credit unions, the Board believes the criteria
should be based on income. 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1757a(b)(2)(A),
1757a(c)(2)(b). Additionally, the Board notes the parallel relationship
between member income and unemployment rates.
Two commenters were concerned the rule would require credit unions
to reapply for the LICU designation annually and stated NCUA should
assist CUs to obtain the data necessary to qualify as a LICU. As
explained below, under the final rule, credit unions are not required
to apply for a LICU designation. Instead, based on data obtained
through examinations, a regional director will notify an FCU that it
qualifies for a low-income designation, and FCUs that accept the
designation will continue to have the designation, without any need to
re-apply, as long as they meet the rule's criteria.
Five commenters stated NCUA should permit current LICUs to maintain
the designation permanently and only apply the new rule to new LICU
designations. One commenter suggested the five-year grandfather period
is insufficient because secondary capital investments are usually for a
seven-to ten-year term. The Board does not believe the LICU designation
should be permanent because LICUs need to continue to be serving low-
income members to fulfill the Act's intent. Nevertheless, the Board
appreciates the need for transition periods. Current LICUs that do not
meet the criteria of the final rule or those that lose the designation
after initially qualifying will not immediately lose their designation.
They will have five years to meet the LICU criteria or otherwise comply
with the Act and NCUA regulations. The final rule also permits a
regional director to extend the adjustment period when an FCU has
secondary capital or nonmember deposit accounts with a maturity beyond
the five-year grandfather provision.
One commenter was concerned there may be unintended adverse
consequences if the rule is finalized and suggested NCUA monitor the
rule's effect on LICUs. NCUA staff has analyzed the impact the final
rule will have on current LICUs and potential designees and determined
more FCUs will likely qualify for the low-income designation under this
final rule than under the current rule. Further, with the possible
exception of one or two FCUs, the Board does not anticipate the final
rule will adversely affect current LICUs. Additionally, this commenter
stated LICUs losing the designation because of the change in income
standard should have the right to appeal the removal to the Board. An
FCU may appeal to the Board a regional director's determination that it
no longer meets the criteria for a LICU designation, but not the loss
of the LICU designation because of the change in the income standard.
One commenter raised a concern that the rule does not adequately
address LICUs that are not geographically based, e.g., single common
bond CUs, multiple common bond CUs. Under the final rule, FCUs can
qualify for a LICU designation under the new procedure regardless of
their charter type.
A commenter suggested NCUA consult with state supervisory
authorities on implications of the regulation. The final rule does not
change the state supervisory authorities' procedures for designating
LICUs.
Another commenter suggested NCUA coordinate this rule with recently
proposed amendments to NCUA's Chartering and Field of Membership Manual
regarding underserved areas to ensure consistency and facilitate
outreach to underserved areas and low-income members. 73 FR 34366 (June
17, 2008). As explained in the preamble to the proposed rule, NCUA is
amending the low-income definition to, among other reasons, better
align NCUA criteria for a low-income designation with the criteria for
the addition of an underserved area to an FCU field of membership and
certification as a CDFI. See 73 FR 22836 (April 28, 2008).
Under the current rule, NCUA uses median household income to
determine if a credit union qualifies for the LICU designation, and
this is inconsistent with the field of membership (FOM) provisions and
criteria for CDFI certification. Multiple common-bond FCUs may add an
underserved area to their FOMs if, among other requirements, the area
meets the definition of an ``investment area,'' as defined in Sec.
103(16) of the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions
Act of 1994. 12 U.S.C. 1759(c)(2)(A)(i); NCUA Chartering and Field of
Membership Manual, Chapter 3, II.A., Interpretive Rulings and Policy
Statement (IRPS) 03-1, 68 FR 18334 (April 15, 2003) (as amended by IRPS
06-1, 71 FR 36667 (June 28, 2006)). Treasury Department regulations,
implementing the Community Development Banking and Financial
Institution Act of 1994, include an MFI at or below 80 percent of the
MFI for corresponding metropolitan area as a factor supporting the
determination that an area is an investment area. 12 CFR 1805.201(b).
Additionally, The Treasury Department's CDFI Fund, through monetary
awards and other benefits, helps promote access to capital and local
economic growth in urban and rural low-income communities across the
nation. Qualifying credit unions obtain assistance from the CDFI Fund
to offer financial services to and further economic development of low-
income members. The CDFI Fund uses MFI to implement the Community
Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994, as
described above.
The use of MFI as a standard to determine low-income status will
bring uniformity and consistency to the regulations, and should
eliminate industry confusion regarding the low-income designation and
application for an underserved area. Additionally, because credit
unions may apply for financial assistance from the CDFI Fund, the Board
believes it would be beneficial to align the low-income formula with
the CDFI Fund criteria. This would reduce the regulatory burden on
credit unions attempting to qualify for the advantages of receiving a
LICU designation and benefits from the CDFI Fund.
Two commenters suggested the Board should expand the rule to enable
more FCUs to serve low-income and underserved people. As noted above,
the final rule will likely allow more FCUs to obtain the low-income
designation. The Board notes the rule does not limit service to low-
income or underserved people, and all FCUs are encouraged to serve low-
income and underserved people within their applicable fields of
membership, regardless of whether they receive a LICU designation.
The Final Rule
In order for an FCU to qualify as a LICU, a majority of its actual
members must meet the definition of ``low-income members.'' The final
rule amends the definition of low-income members and clarifies the
procedures for designating an FCU as a LICU and removing the
designation.
Under the final rule, low-income members are those who earn 80% of
the metropolitan area MFI or less. NCUA will make the determination of
whether a majority of an FCU's members are low-income based on data it
obtains during the examination process. This will involve linking
member address information to publicly available information from the
U.S. Census
[[Page 71911]]
Bureau to estimate member earnings.\1\ Using automated, geo-coding
software, NCUA will use member street addresses collected during FCU
examinations to determine the geographic area \2\ and metropolitan area
\3\ for each member account. NCUA will then use income information for
the geographic area from the Census Bureau and assign estimated
earnings to each member. Using this method, if a majority of an FCU's
members have estimated earnings equal to or less than 80% of the MFI
for the metropolitan area, the FCU will qualify for a LICU designation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Using Census Bureau reports, NCUA can obtain income
information for various types of geographic areas, including a
``census block.'' A census block is the smallest geographic area for
which the Census Bureau collects and tabulates decennial census data
and is an area bounded on all sides by visible features, such as
streets, roads, streams, and railroad tracks, and by invisible
boundaries, such as city, town, township, and county limits,
property lines, and short, imaginary extensions of streets and
roads. A census block may be the size of a city block, or many
square miles of territory in rural areas.
\2\ A ``geographic area'' is any State, the District of
Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto
Rico, the Virgin Islands, or any territory of the United States or a
geographic unit that is a county or equivalent area, a unit of a
local government, incorporated place, census tract, census block,
Zip Code Tabulation Area, block group, or Native American, American
Indian, or Alaskan Native area, as such units are defined or
reported by the U.S. Census Bureau.
\3\ A ``metropolitan area'' is an area designated by the Office
of Management and Budget pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1104(d), 44 U.S.C.
3504(c), and Executive Order 10253, 16 FR 5605 (June 13, 1951) (as
amended).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure all eligible FCUs qualify for the LICU designation under
the new procedure, median earnings for individuals may be substituted
for MFI, and non-metropolitan area MFI data will be used when a member
lives outside a metropolitan area. NCUA recognizes this approach means
different MFI levels will apply in different parts of the country. This
approach recognizes the concept of low-income as related to the cost of
living and salaries in geographic areas. The Census Bureau, however,
provides national statistics in addition by geographical areas and, to
ameliorate potential disparity among geographic areas, the rule
provides an FCU will also qualify for a LICU designation if a majority
of its members are considered low-income when compared to the national
metropolitan MFI.
The rule also provides an alternative basis for an FCU to qualify
for a LICU designation. An FCU may be able to demonstrate the actual
income of its members based on data it has, for example, from loan
applications or surveys of its members. An FCU may qualify as a LICU if
it can establish a majority of its members meet the low-income formula.
For example, an FCU with 1,000 members may be able to show the actual
income of 501 or more of its members is equal to or less than 80% of
the MFI for the metropolitan area(s) where they live. As a practical
matter, the Board thinks few FCUs will need this option because NCUA's
approach of matching member residential information with Census Bureau
income information will provide an estimate very close to members'
actual income.
The proposed rule stated that a regional director ``will
designate'' an FCU as a LICU ``if a majority of its membership
qualifies as low-income members'' but did not indicate how an FCU would
be informed of the designation, how an FCU would indicate that it
wanted the designation, or whether an FCU could refuse the designation.
The final rule clarifies that a regional director will notify an FCU
that it qualifies, and an FCU will then have 30 days to notify the
regional director that it wants to receive the designation. Thus, the
final rule permits an FCU to refuse a low-income designation simply by
opting not to notify the regional director that it wants to receive the
designation. The final rule does not require state supervisory
authorities to change the process or procedures they currently use for
FISCUs to receive the LICU designation from state regulators.
Additionally, the final rule clarifies the process for removing a
low-income designation. If a regional director determines an FCU no
longer meets the criteria for the LICU designation, the regional
director will notify the FCU in writing. The FCU will have five years
after the date of the notice to either requalify as a LICU or come into
compliance with regulations applicable to credit unions that do not
have a low-income designation. If an FCU does not requalify and has
secondary capital or nonmember deposit accounts with a maturity that
extends beyond the five-year adjustment period, a regional director may
give the credit union additional time to satisfy the terms of any
account agreements.
An FCU may appeal to the Board a regional director's determination
that it no longer meets the criteria for the LICU designation. The rule
states an appeal must be filed within 60 days of the date of the
regional director's notice. An FCU will submit its appeal through the
appropriate regional office. On appeal, the Board will determine
whether the regional director correctly applied the regulatory
criteria. An FCU may not, however, appeal the loss of the LICU
designation to the Board solely because of the change in the income
standard in this rule.
In addition to streamlining the proposed rule based on the
comments, the final rule also revised some of the provisions in the
proposal for clarity. The proposed rule noted, with a cross-reference
to Sec. 701.32, that LICUs may receive shares from nonmembers. The
final rule has eliminated this statement as unnecessary. The proposed
rule also defined the term ``geographic areas'' and defined low-income
members in terms of meeting the MFI criteria on the basis of earnings
or the geographic areas where members live. The final rule has deleted
the definition of geographic areas as unnecessary. As proposed, the
alternatives of earning or residence were, in effect, redundant. As
provided in the final rule, the LICU designation is based on
calculating members' estimated earnings based on where they live, using
data from the Census Bureau, and defining geographic areas in the rule
is unnecessary as this is part of the data available from the Census
Bureau.
Finally, the final rule makes a conforming amendment to Sec. 705.3
and clarifies that FCUs qualifying for the low-income designation under
Sec. 701.34 may apply for assistance from the CDRLF. Part 705 and
Sec. 701.34 continue to apply to state-chartered credit unions in
accordance with Sec. 741.204. As stated above, there is no change in
the process or procedures for FISCUs.
Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires NCUA to prepare an analysis
to describe any significant economic impact any regulation may have on
a substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(a). For purposes
of this analysis, NCUA considers credit unions having under $10 million
in assets small entities. Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 03-
2, 68 FR 31949 (May 29, 2003). As of December 31, 2007, out of
approximately 8,410 federally insured credit unions, 3,599 had less
than $10 million in assets.
This final rule directly affects all low-income credit unions, of
which there are approximately 1,087. NCUA estimates approximately 692
low-income credit unions are small entities. Therefore, NCUA has
determined this final rule will have an impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
NCUA has determined, however, the economic impact on entities
affected by the final rule will not be significant. The rule aligns
criteria for a low-income designation with the criteria for the
[[Page 71912]]
addition of an underserved area to a federal credit union field of
membership under Interpretive Rulings and Policy Statement (IRPS) 03-1,
68 FR 18334 (April 15, 2003) (as amended by IRPS 06-1, 71 FR 36667
(June 28, 2006)) and certification as a CDFI. The final rule
establishes one income standard for determining a low-income
designation, underserved areas, and investment areas. It also
eliminates the confusion within the credit union industry due to the
use of different income standards. NCUA believes the final rule reduces
the regulatory burden for LICUs and minimizes any economic impact.
Additionally, the final rule contains a five-year period for affected
LICUs to make necessary operational adjustments. Accordingly, the Board
certifies this rule does not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA) of
1996, Public Law 104-121, provides generally for congressional review
of agency rules. A reporting requirement is triggered in instances
where NCUA issues a final rule as defined by Section 551 of the
Administrative Procedures Act. 5 U.S.C. 551. The Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, an office within OMB, has determined that, for
purposes of SBREFA, this is not a major rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., NCUA may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, an information collection unless it
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number. The final rule now provides for FCUs, once they are
notified that they qualify for the low-income designation, to notify
the appropriate regional director that they wish to accept the
designation. Although, in the past, FCUs have requested the designation
from regional offices, the regulation did not address application
procedures. The final rule, like the proposed, provides that NCUA will
make the determination without requiring FCUs to apply. As FCUs will,
however, be required to notify regional directors that they wish to
accept the designation, NCUA believes this notification is a
``collection of information'' within the meaning of section 3502(3) of
the PRA. Additionally, FCUs that do not receive notification from the
regional director but believe they qualify for the LICU designation may
submit information to demonstrate they meet the criteria. NCUA believes
this voluntary submission is also an information collection. NCUA has
submitted the requirements of the information collections contained in
the final rule to OMB for review and approval under section 3507 of the
PRA and Sec. 1320.11 of OMB's implementing regulations. 5 CFR 1320.11.
OMB approval is pending.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests. In
adherence to fundamental federalism principles, NCUA, an independent
regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies
with the executive order. The final rule will not have substantial
direct effect on the states, on the connection between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has
determined this final rule does not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this final rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law 105-277, 112
Stat. 2681 (1998).
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions, Federal credit unions, Low income, Nonmember
deposits, Secondary capital, Shares.
12 CFR Part 705
Community development, Credit unions, Loans, Low income, Technical
assistance.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board, on November
20, 2008.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
0
For the reasons stated above, NCUA amends 12 CFR parts 701 and 705 as
follows:
PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS
0
1. The authority for part 701 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1757, 1765, 1766, 1781, 1782,
1787, 1789; Title V, Pub. L. 109-351, 120 Stat. 1966.
0
2. Amend Sec. 701.34 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 701.34 Designation of low-income status; Acceptance of secondary
capital accounts by low-income designated credit unions.
(a) Designation of low-income status.
(1) Based on data obtained through examinations, a regional
director will notify a federal credit union that it qualifies for
designation as a low-income credit union if a majority of its
membership qualifies as low-income members. A federal credit union that
wishes to receive the designation will notify the regional director in
writing within 30 days of receipt of the regional director's
notification.
(2) Low-income members are those members who earn 80% or less than
the median family income for the metropolitan area where they live or
national metropolitan area, whichever is greater. A regional director
may use total median earnings for individuals instead of median family
income if it is more beneficial to a federal credit union when
determining if the credit union qualifies for a low-income credit union
designation. A regional director will use the statewide or national,
non-metropolitan area median family income instead of the metropolitan
area or national metropolitan area median family income for members
living outside a metropolitan area. Member earnings will be estimated
based on data reported by the U.S. Census Bureau for the geographic
area where the member lives. The term ``low-income members'' also
includes those members enrolled as students in a college, university,
high school, or vocational school.
(3) Federal credit unions that do not receive notification that
they qualify for a low-income credit union designation but believe they
qualify may submit information to the regional director to demonstrate
they qualify for a low-income credit union designation. For example,
federal credit unions may provide actual member income from loan
applications or surveys to demonstrate a majority of their membership
is low-income members.
(4) If the regional director determines a low-income designated
federal credit union no longer meets the criteria for the designation,
the regional director
[[Page 71913]]
will notify the federal credit union in writing, and the federal credit
union must, within five years, meet the criteria for the designation or
come into compliance with the regulatory requirements applicable to
federal credit unions that do not have a low-income designation. The
designation will remain in effect during the five-year period. If a
federal credit union does not requalify and has secondary capital or
nonmember deposit accounts with a maturity beyond the five-year period,
a regional director may extend the time for a federal credit union to
come into compliance with regulatory requirements to allow the federal
credit union to satisfy the terms of any account agreements. A federal
credit union may appeal a regional director's determination that the
credit union no longer meets the criteria for a low-income designation
to the Board within 60 days of the date of the notice from the regional
director. An appeal must be submitted through the regional director.
(5) Any credit union with a low-income credit union designation on
January 1, 2009 will have five years from that date to meet the
criteria for low-income designation under paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, unless the regional director determines a longer time is
required to allow the low-income credit union to satisfy the terms of a
secondary capital or nonmember deposit account agreement.
(6) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
Median family income and total median earnings for individuals are
income statistics reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The applicable
income data can be obtained via the American FactFinder on the Census
Bureau's webpage at https://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?--
lang=en.
Metropolitan area means an area designated by the Office of
Management and Budget pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1104(d), 44 U.S.C. 3504(c),
and Executive Order 10253, 16 FR 5605 (June 13, 1951) (as amended).
* * * * *
PART 705--COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REVOLVING LOAN FUND FOR CREDIT
UNIONS
0
3. The authority for part 705 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1772c-1; 42 U.S.C. 9822 and 9822 note.
0
4. Amend Sec. 705.3 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 705.3 Definitions.
(a) The term ``low-income members'' means those members defined in
Sec. 701.34 of this chapter.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-28076 Filed 11-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P