Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Prescription Drug Product Labeling: Medication Guide Requirements, 72055-72058 [E8-28064]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Notices
encouraged to participate are employers,
unions, trade associations, labor
associations, professional associations,
and foundations. Others are welcome.
This meeting will include updates
from NIOSH leadership on NORA as
well as updates from approximately half
of the Sector Councils on their progress,
priorities, and implementation plans to
date, including the Agriculture, Forestry
and Fishing Sector; Healthcare and
Social Assistance Sector; Mining Sector;
Mining—Oil and Gas Extraction SubSector; and Transportation,
Warehousing and Utilities Sector. After
each update, there will be time to
discuss partnership opportunities.
Status: The meeting is open to the
public, limited only by the capacities of
the conference call and conference room
facilities. There is limited space
available in the meeting room (capacity
34). Therefore, information to allow
participation in the meeting through the
internet (to see the slides) and a
teleconference call (capacity 50) will be
provided to registered participants.
Participants are encouraged to consider
attending by this method. Each
participant is requested to register for
the free meeting by sending an e-mail to
noracoordinator@cdc.gov containing the
participant’s name, organization name,
contact telephone number on the day of
the meeting, and preference for
participation by Web meeting
(requirements include: computer,
internet connection, and telephone,
preferably with ‘‘mute’’ capability) or in
person. An e-mail confirming
registration will include the details
needed to participate in the Web
meeting. Non-US citizens are
encouraged to participate in the Web
meeting. Non-US citizens registering to
attend in person after January 8 will not
have time to comply with security
procedures.
Background: NORA is a partnership
program to stimulate innovative
research in occupational safety and
health leading to improved workplace
practices. Unveiled in 1996, NORA has
become a research framework for the
nation. Diverse parties collaborate to
identify the most critical issues in
workplace safety and health. Partners
then work together to develop goals and
objectives for addressing those needs
and to move the research results into
practice. The NIOSH role is facilitator of
the process. For more information about
NORA, see https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/
nora/about.html.
Since 2006, NORA has been
structured according to industrial
sectors. Eight sector groups have been
defined using the North American
Industrial Classification System
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:30 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
(NAICS). After receiving public input
through the Web and town hall
meetings, NORA Sector Councils have
been working to define sector-specific
strategic plans for conducting research
and moving the results into widespread
practice. During 2008, most of these
Councils have posted draft strategic
plans for public comment. One has
posted its finalized National Sector
Agenda after considering comments on
its draft. For more information, see the
link above and choose ‘‘Sector-based
Approach,’’ ‘‘NORA Sector Councils,’’
‘‘Sector Agendas’’ and ‘‘Comment on
Draft Sector Agendas’’ from the rightside menu.
Contact Person for Technical
Information: Sidney C. Soderholm,
Ph.D., NORA Coordinator, e-mail
noracoordinator@cdc.gov, telephone
(202) 245–0665.
Dated: November 19, 2008.
James D. Seligman,
Chief Information Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8–28152 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–19–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC)
Request for Nominations of
Candidates To Serve on the Advisory
Committee on Immunization Practices
(ACIP)
CDC is soliciting nominations for
possible membership on ACIP. This
committee provides advice and
guidance to the Secretary, Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS),
and the Director, CDC, regarding the
most appropriate application of antigens
and related agents for effective
communicable disease control in the
civilian population. The committee
reviews and reports regularly on
immunization practices and
recommends improvements in the
national immunization efforts.
The committee also establishes,
reviews, and as appropriate, revises the
list of vaccines for administration to
children eligible to receive vaccines
through the Vaccines for Children (VFC)
Program. Nominations are being sought
for individuals who have expertise and
qualifications necessary to contribute to
the accomplishments of the committee’s
objectives. Nominees will be selected
based upon expertise in the field of
immunization practices; multidisciplinary expertise in public health;
expertise in the use of vaccines and
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72055
immunologic agents in both clinical and
preventive medicine; knowledge of
vaccine development, evaluation, and
vaccine delivery; or knowledge about
consumer perspectives and/or social
and community aspects of
immunization programs.
Federal employees will not be
considered for membership. Members
may be invited to serve for up to fouryear terms.
Consideration is given to
representation from diverse geographic
areas, both genders, ethnic and minority
groups, and the disabled. Nominees
must be U.S. citizens.
The following information must be
submitted for each candidate: name,
affiliation, address, telephone number,
e-mail address and current curriculum
vitae.
Nominations should be accompanied
with a letter of recommendation stating
the qualifications of the nominee and
postmarked by December 15, 2008 to:
Antonette Hill, Immunization Service
Division, National Center for
Immunization and Respiratory Diseases,
CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop
E–05, Atlanta, Georgia 30333,
Telephone (404) 639–8836.
The Director, Management Analysis
and Services Office, has been delegated
the authority to sign Federal Register
notices pertaining to announcements of
meetings and other committee
management activities for both CDC and
the Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry.
Dated: November 18, 2008.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. E8–28154 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0162]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Prescription Drug
Product Labeling: Medication Guide
Requirements
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
72056
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Notices
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA).
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by December
26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–6974, or e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0393. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA–710),
Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,
301–796–3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Prescription Drug Product Labeling:
Medication Guide Requirements (OMB
Control Number 0910–0393—Extension)
FDA regulations require the
distribution of patient labeling, called
Medication Guides, for certain
prescription human drug and biological
products used primarily on an
outpatient basis that pose a serious and
significant public health concern
requiring distribution of FDA-approved
patient medication information. These
Medication Guides inform patients
about the most important information
they should know about these products
in order to use them safely and
effectively. Included is information such
as the drug’s approved uses,
contraindications, adverse drug
reactions, and cautions for specific
populations, with a focus on why the
particular product requires a Medication
Guide. These regulations are intended to
improve the public health by providing
information necessary for patients to use
certain medication safely and
effectively.
The regulations contain the following
reporting requirements that are subject
to the PRA. The estimates for the burden
hours imposed by the following
regulations are listed in the table 1 of
this document:
• 21 CFR 208.20—Applicants must
submit draft Medication Guides for FDA
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:30 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
approval according to the prescribed
content and format.
• 21 CFR 208.24(e)—Each authorized
dispenser of a prescription drug product
for which a Medication Guide is
required, when dispensing the product
to a patient or to a patient’s agent, must
provide a Medication Guide directly to
each patient unless an exemption
applies under § 208.26 (21 CFR 208.26).
• 21 CFR 208.26(a)—Requests may be
submitted for exemption or deferral
from particular Medication Guide
content or format requirements.
• 21 CFR 314.70(b)(3)(ii) and 21 CFR
601.12(f)—Application holders must
submit changes to Medication Guides to
FDA for prior approval as supplements
to their applications.
In the Federal Register of March 18,
2008 (73 FR 14471), FDA published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the information collection
provisions. We received the following
comments:
(Comment 1) The comments said that
FDA’s estimate of the hourly burden for
pharmacists to comply with the
Medication Guide requirements is
inaccurate, and that pharmacists spend
significantly more time determining
whether a Medication Guide is required,
tracking appropriate Medication Guides
from manufacturers or distributors,
explaining to the patient what the
Medication Guide is, in addition to
patient counseling. The comments
noted that FDA’s estimate that a
pharmacist spends 0.0014 hours (5
seconds) to distribute each Medication
Guide remains unchanged since the
December 1, 1998, final rule entitled
‘‘Prescription Drug Product Labeling;
Medication Guide Requirements,’’ even
though the Medication Guide program
has continued to expand (63 FR 66378).
The comments said that FDA’s estimates
are inadequate and fail to consider the
operational realities pharmacists now
face in complying with the program.
The comments said that pharmacy
personnel spend tens of thousands of
hours obtaining and distributing
Medication Guides for each new
prescription and all refills for
Medication Guide medications.
Response: FDA agrees with the
comments. However, the comments did
not suggest an alternative burden
estimate for Medication Guide
distribution by pharmacists. We are
increasing the burden estimate for
§ 208.24(e) to 3 minutes for each
Medication Guide distributed by
pharmacists. If the commenters believe
that this estimate is insufficient, we
request comments on why an alternative
estimate would be more accurate. We
are also increasing to 25 the number of
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Medication Guides that FDA receives
per year under § 208.20.
(Comment 2) The comments also said
that there are distributor costs to comply
with the Medication Guide
requirements, and table 1 in the March
18, 2008, Federal Register notice
omitted § 208.24(c), which provides that
‘‘Each distributor or packer that receives
Medication Guides * * * shall provide
those Medication Guides * * * to each
authorized dispenser to whom it ships
a container of drug product.’’ The
comments said that the burden to
distributors and packers to distribute
Medication Guides—the process of
tracking, sorting, matching, and
shipping multiple versions of
Medication Guides for multiple
products—should be included in the
analysis.
Response: FDA agrees with the
comments and is willing to include a
burden estimate for § 208.24(c). We are
requesting comments on specific
estimates for this requirement.
(Comment 3) The remaining issues
raised by the comments in response to
the March 18, 2008, Federal Register
notice are generally the same as the
issues raised during FDA’s public
hearing on the use of Medication Guides
to distribute drug risk information to
patients (announced in the Federal
Register of April 9, 2007 (72 FR 17559))
and the same as the comments
submitted to that docket. (One
commenter also referenced comments
previously submitted to FDA in the
‘‘June 2006 White Paper on Patient
Safety Implications on Implementation
of the Current FDA-Mandated
Medication Guide Program’’). On July 2,
2007, FDA posted a ‘‘Summary of Public
Hearing on FDA’s Use of Medication
Guides to Distribute Drug Risk
Information to Patients’’ at https://
www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/
SummaryPublicHearing
MedicationGuides.htm. The issues
raised in conjunction with the public
hearing, as well as the comments
summarized below, are still under
consideration at FDA, and we have not
yet decided what actions we will take in
response to suggestions to modify the
Medication Guide program.
The following is a summary of the
comments received on the March 18,
2008, notice; these comments do not
pertain to the specific burden estimates,
but were taken into consideration by
FDA.
(Comment 4) The comments said that
despite stating in the Medication Guide
final rule that FDA will use Medication
Guides sparingly, the agency continues
to add new Medication Guides for drugs
in a manner inconsistent with its
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Notices
original intent. The comments said that
FDA intended Medication Guides to be
used only when a drug posed very
serious or significant side effects, and
that it anticipated the program to be
limited to a small number of products,
and not more than 5 to 10 products per
year. The comments said that by 2004,
about 20 products required Medication
Guides, and that starting in 2005, FDA
began requiring Medication Guides for
entire medication classes, which have
grown to include antidepressants,
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,
and attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder and sleep disorder drugs. The
comments said that today almost 300
million prescriptions per year for over
10,000 separate drug products are
subject to the Medication Guide
requirement, and pharmacists are
dispensing Medication Guides for
substantially more drugs than originally
estimated. The comments said that this
has created significant burdens for
pharmacists.
(Comment 5) The comments said that
there is no evidence that a Medication
Guide is a good vehicle for risk
communication, and FDA has not
provided evidence that the program is
valuable to patients or improves the safe
and effective use of prescription drugs.
The comments said that given the
amount of information patients are
likely to receive with their
prescriptions, they face a tremendous
challenge in actually reading each piece
of information. As a result, the
comments said, many patients are likely
to not read any material provided to
them. Those patients that desire to gain
additional information about their
therapy but are unable to read each
document are placed in a position of
having to decide which document
distributed to them is more important
than the other. The comments said that
FDA should first evaluate whether
patients actually read the Medication
Guides distributed to them, and then
assess whether the information
contained in a Medication Guide is
easily understood by patients. The
comments said that many patients are
likely to find the information difficult to
understand or confusing, and that many
patients, especially older and disabled
patients, have cognitive impairments
that may pose tremendous challenges in
understanding information contained in
a Medication Guide. The comments also
asked whether the information
contained in the Medication Guide is
already available to patients. For
example, the comments said that
pharmacists provide counseling on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:30 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
safe and effective use of medication to
their patients at the time of dispensing,
and are able to translate highly complex
information about a drug’s
characteristics, use parameters, sideeffects and abuse potential. The
comments said this counseling by
pharmacists, coupled with other
information already distributed to
patients, such as consumer medication
information and the patient package
insert or the patient information sheet,
raises questions about the need for the
Medication Guide program. The
comments also said that FDA has not
made sufficient data available to the
public to support the position that the
Medication Guide program is important
to communicate risk, and FDA should
release all data from its surveys and
studies for review and comment by
health care provider groups. The
comments said that this data will help
generate a more accurate estimate of the
burden imposed on the public as a
result of the Medication Guide program.
(Comment 6) The comments said that
pharmacists face difficulties in
obtaining Medication Guides. The
comments said that some Medication
Guides are included with the product
itself in the package insert, some are
provided in tear-off sheets, and some are
available electronically. The comments
said that the lack of a standardized
delivery model complicates efforts to
operationally streamline dispenser and
distribution systems for duplicating and
providing Medication Guides. In
addition, pharmacists at times need to
call a toll-free number to order hard
copies of the Medication Guides for
distribution. The comments said that
FDA should establish standards for
manufacturer distribution of medication
guides and establish a single toll-free
number or Internet site for pharmacies
to use to obtain Medication Guides.
(Comment 7) The comments said that
FDA should waive certain Medication
Guide formatting requirements to permit
pharmacies to print Medication Guides
through existing pharmacy computer
systems. The comments said that
permitting pharmacies to print
Medication Guides would enhance their
distribution and will free pharmacists’
time to use for patient counseling and
care. The comments also said FDA
should permit pharmacies to e-mail
Medication Guides to their patients.
(Comment 8) The comments said that
a single, uniform Medication Guide
should be used for all brand and generic
versions of the same drug, or for drugs
within the same therapeutic class, with
similar risk warnings, and that each
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
72057
brand and generic manufacturer of the
same drug or the same class of drug
should not have to produce its own
Medication Guide. The comments said
that for medications that have unique
and rare side effects that are not shared
with the other drugs in the same class,
FDA should consider having a class
Medication Guide that specifically lists
per paragraph each drug in the class
while highlighting risk information that
is unique to certain medications within
that class.
(Comment 9) The comments said that
Medication Guides should only be
required the first time a prescription is
filled, and thereafter only when
requested by a patient for that
prescription’s refill.
(Comment 10) The comments said to
eliminate duplication and enhance the
usefulness of patient information, a
single, manufacturer-produced, patientoriented FDA-approved Medication
Information Document should be
developed for each drug that currently
requires a Medication Guide. This single
document could combine consumer
medication information and Medication
Guide information. The comments said
they are willing to work with FDA and
other interested stakeholders in
designing and implementing such a
program. Alternatively, the comments
said that FDA should standardize the
information that must be included in
the Medication Guide and require a
consistent format, look, and feel to
Medication Guide information.
(Comment 11) The comments said
that physicians and other providers
should give the Medication Guide
directly to the patient at the time the
prescription is written. The comments
said the physician is in the best position
to discuss not only the possible risks
associated with the medication but to
also discuss alternative therapies if
necessary. The comments also said that
FDA should consider ways that
prescribers could be better informed
about medications that require
Medication Guides.
(Comment 12) The comments said
that the Medication Guide requirements
were imposed on distribution and
dispensing entities that were neither
prepared nor operationally structured
(for example, lack of space, staff, and
equipment) to prepare and provide for
their dissemination.
Based on the comments in ‘‘Comment
(1)’’ of this document, FDA has revised
the estimated annual reporting burden
as follows:
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
72058
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 26, 2008 / Notices
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
No. of
Respondents
21 CFR Section
208.20
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
25
1
25
320
8,000
208.24(e)
59,000
5,000
295,000,000
0.05
14,750,000
208.26(a)
1
1
1
4
4
314.70 (b)(3)(ii) and 601.12(f)
5
1
5
72
360
Total
14,758,364
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Dated: November 19, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–28064 Filed 11–25–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0595]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Experimental
Study: Toll-Free Number for Consumer
Reporting of Drug Product Side Effects
in Direct-to-Consumer Television
Advertisements for Prescription Drugs
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on a
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
a study examining the impact on
consumer comprehension of inclusion
of a toll-free number to report side
effects in direct-to-consumer (DTC)
prescription drug television
advertisements.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by January 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:30 Nov 25, 2008
Jkt 217001
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos,Office of Information
Management (HFA–710), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Toll-Free Number for Consumer
Reporting of Drug Product Side Effects
in Direct-to-Consumer Television
Advertisements for Prescription Drugs
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) requires that
manufacturers, packers, and distributors
(sponsors) who advertise prescription
human and animal drugs, including
biological products for humans, disclose
in advertisements certain information
about the advertised product’s uses and
risks. For prescription drugs and
biologics, the act requires
advertisements to contain ‘‘information
in brief summary relating to side effects,
contraindications, and effectiveness’’
(21 U.S.C. 352(n)). FDA is responsible
for enforcing the act and implementing
regulations.
On September 27, 2007, the President
signed into law the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act
(FDAAA) (Public Law 110–85). Title IX
of FDAAA amends section 502(n) of the
act (21 U.S.C. 352) by requiring printed
DTC advertisements for prescription
drug products to include the following
statement printed in conspicuous text:
‘‘You are encouraged to report negative
side effects of prescription drugs to the
FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch, or
call 1–800–FDA–1088.’’ Title IX of
FDAAA also requires the Secretary of
Health and Human Services (the
Secretary), in consultation with the Risk
Communication Advisory Committee
(RCAC), to conduct a study not later
than 6 months after the date of
enactment of FDAAA to determine if
this statement is appropriate for
inclusion in DTC television
advertisements for prescription drug
products. As part of this study, the
Secretary shall consider whether the
information in the statement described
previously in this paragraph would
E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM
26NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 26, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72055-72058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-28064]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0162]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Prescription Drug
Product Labeling: Medication Guide Requirements
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the
[[Page 72056]]
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
December 26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-6974, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0393.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance:
Prescription Drug Product Labeling: Medication Guide Requirements (OMB
Control Number 0910-0393--Extension)
FDA regulations require the distribution of patient labeling,
called Medication Guides, for certain prescription human drug and
biological products used primarily on an outpatient basis that pose a
serious and significant public health concern requiring distribution of
FDA-approved patient medication information. These Medication Guides
inform patients about the most important information they should know
about these products in order to use them safely and effectively.
Included is information such as the drug's approved uses,
contraindications, adverse drug reactions, and cautions for specific
populations, with a focus on why the particular product requires a
Medication Guide. These regulations are intended to improve the public
health by providing information necessary for patients to use certain
medication safely and effectively.
The regulations contain the following reporting requirements that
are subject to the PRA. The estimates for the burden hours imposed by
the following regulations are listed in the table 1 of this document:
21 CFR 208.20--Applicants must submit draft Medication
Guides for FDA approval according to the prescribed content and format.
21 CFR 208.24(e)--Each authorized dispenser of a
prescription drug product for which a Medication Guide is required,
when dispensing the product to a patient or to a patient's agent, must
provide a Medication Guide directly to each patient unless an exemption
applies under Sec. 208.26 (21 CFR 208.26).
21 CFR 208.26(a)--Requests may be submitted for exemption
or deferral from particular Medication Guide content or format
requirements.
21 CFR 314.70(b)(3)(ii) and 21 CFR 601.12(f)--Application
holders must submit changes to Medication Guides to FDA for prior
approval as supplements to their applications.
In the Federal Register of March 18, 2008 (73 FR 14471), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the information
collection provisions. We received the following comments:
(Comment 1) The comments said that FDA's estimate of the hourly
burden for pharmacists to comply with the Medication Guide requirements
is inaccurate, and that pharmacists spend significantly more time
determining whether a Medication Guide is required, tracking
appropriate Medication Guides from manufacturers or distributors,
explaining to the patient what the Medication Guide is, in addition to
patient counseling. The comments noted that FDA's estimate that a
pharmacist spends 0.0014 hours (5 seconds) to distribute each
Medication Guide remains unchanged since the December 1, 1998, final
rule entitled ``Prescription Drug Product Labeling; Medication Guide
Requirements,'' even though the Medication Guide program has continued
to expand (63 FR 66378). The comments said that FDA's estimates are
inadequate and fail to consider the operational realities pharmacists
now face in complying with the program. The comments said that pharmacy
personnel spend tens of thousands of hours obtaining and distributing
Medication Guides for each new prescription and all refills for
Medication Guide medications.
Response: FDA agrees with the comments. However, the comments did
not suggest an alternative burden estimate for Medication Guide
distribution by pharmacists. We are increasing the burden estimate for
Sec. 208.24(e) to 3 minutes for each Medication Guide distributed by
pharmacists. If the commenters believe that this estimate is
insufficient, we request comments on why an alternative estimate would
be more accurate. We are also increasing to 25 the number of Medication
Guides that FDA receives per year under Sec. 208.20.
(Comment 2) The comments also said that there are distributor costs
to comply with the Medication Guide requirements, and table 1 in the
March 18, 2008, Federal Register notice omitted Sec. 208.24(c), which
provides that ``Each distributor or packer that receives Medication
Guides * * * shall provide those Medication Guides * * * to each
authorized dispenser to whom it ships a container of drug product.''
The comments said that the burden to distributors and packers to
distribute Medication Guides--the process of tracking, sorting,
matching, and shipping multiple versions of Medication Guides for
multiple products--should be included in the analysis.
Response: FDA agrees with the comments and is willing to include a
burden estimate for Sec. 208.24(c). We are requesting comments on
specific estimates for this requirement.
(Comment 3) The remaining issues raised by the comments in response
to the March 18, 2008, Federal Register notice are generally the same
as the issues raised during FDA's public hearing on the use of
Medication Guides to distribute drug risk information to patients
(announced in the Federal Register of April 9, 2007 (72 FR 17559)) and
the same as the comments submitted to that docket. (One commenter also
referenced comments previously submitted to FDA in the ``June 2006
White Paper on Patient Safety Implications on Implementation of the
Current FDA-Mandated Medication Guide Program''). On July 2, 2007, FDA
posted a ``Summary of Public Hearing on FDA's Use of Medication Guides
to Distribute Drug Risk Information to Patients'' at https://
www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/SummaryPublicHearingMedicationGuides.htm. The
issues raised in conjunction with the public hearing, as well as the
comments summarized below, are still under consideration at FDA, and we
have not yet decided what actions we will take in response to
suggestions to modify the Medication Guide program.
The following is a summary of the comments received on the March
18, 2008, notice; these comments do not pertain to the specific burden
estimates, but were taken into consideration by FDA.
(Comment 4) The comments said that despite stating in the
Medication Guide final rule that FDA will use Medication Guides
sparingly, the agency continues to add new Medication Guides for drugs
in a manner inconsistent with its
[[Page 72057]]
original intent. The comments said that FDA intended Medication Guides
to be used only when a drug posed very serious or significant side
effects, and that it anticipated the program to be limited to a small
number of products, and not more than 5 to 10 products per year. The
comments said that by 2004, about 20 products required Medication
Guides, and that starting in 2005, FDA began requiring Medication
Guides for entire medication classes, which have grown to include
antidepressants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder and sleep disorder drugs. The comments
said that today almost 300 million prescriptions per year for over
10,000 separate drug products are subject to the Medication Guide
requirement, and pharmacists are dispensing Medication Guides for
substantially more drugs than originally estimated. The comments said
that this has created significant burdens for pharmacists.
(Comment 5) The comments said that there is no evidence that a
Medication Guide is a good vehicle for risk communication, and FDA has
not provided evidence that the program is valuable to patients or
improves the safe and effective use of prescription drugs. The comments
said that given the amount of information patients are likely to
receive with their prescriptions, they face a tremendous challenge in
actually reading each piece of information. As a result, the comments
said, many patients are likely to not read any material provided to
them. Those patients that desire to gain additional information about
their therapy but are unable to read each document are placed in a
position of having to decide which document distributed to them is more
important than the other. The comments said that FDA should first
evaluate whether patients actually read the Medication Guides
distributed to them, and then assess whether the information contained
in a Medication Guide is easily understood by patients. The comments
said that many patients are likely to find the information difficult to
understand or confusing, and that many patients, especially older and
disabled patients, have cognitive impairments that may pose tremendous
challenges in understanding information contained in a Medication
Guide. The comments also asked whether the information contained in the
Medication Guide is already available to patients. For example, the
comments said that pharmacists provide counseling on the safe and
effective use of medication to their patients at the time of
dispensing, and are able to translate highly complex information about
a drug's characteristics, use parameters, side-effects and abuse
potential. The comments said this counseling by pharmacists, coupled
with other information already distributed to patients, such as
consumer medication information and the patient package insert or the
patient information sheet, raises questions about the need for the
Medication Guide program. The comments also said that FDA has not made
sufficient data available to the public to support the position that
the Medication Guide program is important to communicate risk, and FDA
should release all data from its surveys and studies for review and
comment by health care provider groups. The comments said that this
data will help generate a more accurate estimate of the burden imposed
on the public as a result of the Medication Guide program.
(Comment 6) The comments said that pharmacists face difficulties in
obtaining Medication Guides. The comments said that some Medication
Guides are included with the product itself in the package insert, some
are provided in tear-off sheets, and some are available electronically.
The comments said that the lack of a standardized delivery model
complicates efforts to operationally streamline dispenser and
distribution systems for duplicating and providing Medication Guides.
In addition, pharmacists at times need to call a toll-free number to
order hard copies of the Medication Guides for distribution. The
comments said that FDA should establish standards for manufacturer
distribution of medication guides and establish a single toll-free
number or Internet site for pharmacies to use to obtain Medication
Guides.
(Comment 7) The comments said that FDA should waive certain
Medication Guide formatting requirements to permit pharmacies to print
Medication Guides through existing pharmacy computer systems. The
comments said that permitting pharmacies to print Medication Guides
would enhance their distribution and will free pharmacists' time to use
for patient counseling and care. The comments also said FDA should
permit pharmacies to e-mail Medication Guides to their patients.
(Comment 8) The comments said that a single, uniform Medication
Guide should be used for all brand and generic versions of the same
drug, or for drugs within the same therapeutic class, with similar risk
warnings, and that each brand and generic manufacturer of the same drug
or the same class of drug should not have to produce its own Medication
Guide. The comments said that for medications that have unique and rare
side effects that are not shared with the other drugs in the same
class, FDA should consider having a class Medication Guide that
specifically lists per paragraph each drug in the class while
highlighting risk information that is unique to certain medications
within that class.
(Comment 9) The comments said that Medication Guides should only be
required the first time a prescription is filled, and thereafter only
when requested by a patient for that prescription's refill.
(Comment 10) The comments said to eliminate duplication and enhance
the usefulness of patient information, a single, manufacturer-produced,
patient-oriented FDA-approved Medication Information Document should be
developed for each drug that currently requires a Medication Guide.
This single document could combine consumer medication information and
Medication Guide information. The comments said they are willing to
work with FDA and other interested stakeholders in designing and
implementing such a program. Alternatively, the comments said that FDA
should standardize the information that must be included in the
Medication Guide and require a consistent format, look, and feel to
Medication Guide information.
(Comment 11) The comments said that physicians and other providers
should give the Medication Guide directly to the patient at the time
the prescription is written. The comments said the physician is in the
best position to discuss not only the possible risks associated with
the medication but to also discuss alternative therapies if necessary.
The comments also said that FDA should consider ways that prescribers
could be better informed about medications that require Medication
Guides.
(Comment 12) The comments said that the Medication Guide
requirements were imposed on distribution and dispensing entities that
were neither prepared nor operationally structured (for example, lack
of space, staff, and equipment) to prepare and provide for their
dissemination.
Based on the comments in ``Comment (1)'' of this document, FDA has
revised the estimated annual reporting burden as follows:
[[Page 72058]]
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per
21 CFR Section Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
208.20 25 1 25 320 8,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
208.24(e) 59,000 5,000 295,000,000 0.05 14,750,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
208.26(a) 1 1 1 4 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
314.70 (b)(3)(ii) 5 1 5 72 360
and 601.12(f)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 14,758,364
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
Dated: November 19, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-28064 Filed 11-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S