Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 71717-71718 [E8-27901]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 25, 2008 / Notices
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
19, 2008.
Kimberly Orben,
Director, Office of Financial Management,
Federal Railroad Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–27908 Filed 11–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) received
a request for a waiver of compliance
with certain requirements of its safety
standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party
seeking relief, the regulatory provisions
involved, the nature of the relief being
requested, and the petitioner’s
arguments in favor of relief.
Union Pacific Railroad Company
(Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–
2007–28454)
The Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP) seeks a waiver of compliance from
certain provisions of 49 CFR Part 232,
Brake System Safety Standards for
Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains
and Equipment. Specifically, UP seeks
relief from the requirement in
§ 232.305(b)(2) to perform a single car
air brake test (SCABT) when a ‘‘car is on
a shop or repair track, as defined in
§ 232.303(a), for any reason and has not
received a single car air brake test
within the previous 12-month period.’’
UP submitted a similar request in
2007, which was assigned Docket
Number FRA–2007–28454. On
September 12, 2008, FRA issued a letter
to UP denying the 2007 waiver request
because, ‘‘[t]he petition was ambiguous
regarding the scope of the relief
requested’’ and it lacked sufficient
information to support the relief sought.
Subsequently, UP petitioned for
reconsideration of FRA’s decision to
deny its 2007 request. On October 30,
2008, UP withdrew its request that FRA
reconsider its denial and at the same
time, UP submitted a new waiver
petition, requesting similar relief as in
2007, but including new information
and data supporting its request. Because
this new waiver petition involves the
same subject matter as UP’s previous
request, FRA is utilizing the same
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
docket number (FRA–2007–28454), and
publishing this new public notice of the
request. In light of the new data
provided by UP, FRA will conduct a
new investigation of the facts and the
merits of the request. Accordingly,
comments submitted to the docket prior
to UP’s October 30, 2008 petition, will
not be considered in FRA’s evaluation
of this new request.
UP seeks relief from the regulation to
the extent necessary to permit the
replacement of non FRA-condemnable
wheelsets on railcars as part of an intrain wheelset replacement program,
without the need to also perform
SCABTs required by § 232.305(b)(2). UP
seeks relief such that only railcars with
FRA-condemnable wheels and cars due
for 5-year SCABTs within 6 months
would require and receive SCABTs. UP
requests that this relief apply to all UP
unit trains.
In its petition, UP explains that it
implemented the in-train wheelset
replacement program beginning in
August 2006, as a means to aggressively
identify and replace wheelsets with
irregularities, thereby reducing the
number of derailments due to broken
rails, joint bars, defective wheels and
bearings. In-train wheelset replacements
can be done by UP mechanical forces in
as little as 15 minutes with no need to
remove the cars from trains. This in turn
reduces the number of switching events
that would otherwise be required to
affect the repairs, further reducing the
risk of injury and derailment. In North
Platte, UP estimates that switching
moves have been reduced by at least
20,000 annually (conservative estimate).
Further, UP notes that this in-train
wheelset replacement program permits
UP to replace approximately 25 percent
more wheelsets than it did using
traditional wheelset placement
techniques.
UP explains that cars with defective
wheelsets are identified by wayside
defect detectors at various locations
before the trains reach the terminal.
These wayside detectors identify the
following conditions requiring wheelset
replacements: (1) Wheels causing
excessive impacts, which are measured
in kips, or units of 1,000 pounds
(currently, AAR allows carriers to
replace wheels exerting impacts of 90
kips or more); (2) wheels with high
flanges, thin flanges, or other
geometrical irregularities; and (3)
defective bearings. If left unchecked,
any of these conditions can develop into
more advanced defects posing higher
risks of wheel or axle failures, along
with undue forces on track structures
leading to rail breaks.
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71717
UP states that since the program has
been in effect, wheelset related
derailments have decreased. Bearingrelated derailments have also decreased.
UP concludes from their data that if the
in-train wheelset program were to stop,
there would be four to five additional
wheelset related derailments annually.
Moreover, UP believes that most
SCABTs do not reveal any defects.
According to UP, a sample of 2008 data
indicated that only 12.08 percent of all
railcars undergoing SCABTs on UPs rail
network were found to have brakerelated defects. UP notes that for coal
cars, the defect was lower yet, at 3.05
percent. Accordingly, UP asserts that
given the low number of defects
revealed by SCABTs and the high safety
benefits of in-train wheelset
replacements, there is no justification
for requiring SCABTs for the in-train
wheelset replacement program.
While UP seeks relief from performing
the many SCABTs associated with intrain wheelset replacements, UP
understands the importance of
complying with the 5-year SCABT
requirement. To address this, during
recent years UP has upgraded its
information systems to automatically
flag railcars that are due for a 5-year
SCABT within 90 days. On January 1,
2009, the system will flag cars within 6
months of a 5-year SCABT. UP states
that if FRA grants this waiver request,
UP will perform a SCABT on any railcar
undergoing an in-train wheelset
replacement that is due for a 5-year
SCABT in the following 6 months.
However, UP states that if this relief is
not granted, it would be forced to
reduce the number of wheelset
replacements it makes, or even
eliminate the in-train wheelset
replacement program in some locations.
UP asserts that this would negate the
derailment prevention and safety gains
associated with the in-train wheelset
replacement program. UP asserts that
the delays and disruption of performing
a SCABT on every car that has not
received such a test in the previous 12
months (roughly 50 percent) would be
intolerable. UP also asserts that many of
the mechanical forces that currently
perform in-train wheelset replacements
could be displaced. Finally, UP asserts
that requiring the railroad to perform
time-consuming and unnecessary
SCABTs on railcars that do not contain
FRA-condemnable defects would
improperly penalize UP for its
innovative and safety-enhancing in-train
wheelset replacement program, as well
as discourage further investment in
emerging technologies including
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
71718
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 25, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
wayside and onboard monitoring, and
ECP braking.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (Docket No.
FRA–2007–28454) and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 30
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) At the
above facility. All documents in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477).
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
19, 2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E8–27901 Filed 11–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
Program Grant Program: Corrections
to Project ID Numbers
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; correction
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice revises Project
Identification Numbers published in the
August 22, 2008, Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) notice titled
‘‘Over-the-Road Bus Accessibility
Program Announcement of Project
Selections.’’ The notice identifies
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
corrections to Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 and
2008 Project Identification Numbers;
however, award amounts remain
unchanged.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact the appropriate FTA Regional
Office (Appendix A) or Blenda Younger,
Office of Program Management, (202)
366–2053.
I. Corrections
In the Federal Register of August 22,
2008 (73 FR 49737), the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) published a table
listing award amounts under the Overthe-Road Bus Accessibility Program. A
revised table accompanies this notice
which includes the following technical
corrections.
1. The Project ID number indicated as
D2007–OTRB–061, total award
$151,200, should be deleted and
replaced with two rows: D2007–OTRB–
061, total, $8,856 and D2008–OTRB–
061, total, $142,344, as this project will
be funded using both FY 2007 and FY
2008 funds.
2. The Project ID numbers indicated
as D2007–OTRB–062 through D2007–
OTRB–079 should be corrected to read
D2008–OTRB–062 through D2008–
OTRB–079, as these projects will be
funded with FY 2008 funds and not FY
2007 funds. The total monetary awards
remain unchanged and the total
awarded to each recipient remains
unchanged.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 4th day of
November, 2008.
James S. Simpson,
Administrator.
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71717-71718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27901]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) received a request for a waiver of compliance with certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.
Union Pacific Railroad Company (Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-2007-
28454)
The Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) seeks a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of 49 CFR Part 232, Brake System
Safety Standards for Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains and
Equipment. Specifically, UP seeks relief from the requirement in Sec.
232.305(b)(2) to perform a single car air brake test (SCABT) when a
``car is on a shop or repair track, as defined in Sec. 232.303(a), for
any reason and has not received a single car air brake test within the
previous 12-month period.''
UP submitted a similar request in 2007, which was assigned Docket
Number FRA-2007-28454. On September 12, 2008, FRA issued a letter to UP
denying the 2007 waiver request because, ``[t]he petition was ambiguous
regarding the scope of the relief requested'' and it lacked sufficient
information to support the relief sought.
Subsequently, UP petitioned for reconsideration of FRA's decision
to deny its 2007 request. On October 30, 2008, UP withdrew its request
that FRA reconsider its denial and at the same time, UP submitted a new
waiver petition, requesting similar relief as in 2007, but including
new information and data supporting its request. Because this new
waiver petition involves the same subject matter as UP's previous
request, FRA is utilizing the same docket number (FRA-2007-28454), and
publishing this new public notice of the request. In light of the new
data provided by UP, FRA will conduct a new investigation of the facts
and the merits of the request. Accordingly, comments submitted to the
docket prior to UP's October 30, 2008 petition, will not be considered
in FRA's evaluation of this new request.
UP seeks relief from the regulation to the extent necessary to
permit the replacement of non FRA-condemnable wheelsets on railcars as
part of an in-train wheelset replacement program, without the need to
also perform SCABTs required by Sec. 232.305(b)(2). UP seeks relief
such that only railcars with FRA-condemnable wheels and cars due for 5-
year SCABTs within 6 months would require and receive SCABTs. UP
requests that this relief apply to all UP unit trains.
In its petition, UP explains that it implemented the in-train
wheelset replacement program beginning in August 2006, as a means to
aggressively identify and replace wheelsets with irregularities,
thereby reducing the number of derailments due to broken rails, joint
bars, defective wheels and bearings. In-train wheelset replacements can
be done by UP mechanical forces in as little as 15 minutes with no need
to remove the cars from trains. This in turn reduces the number of
switching events that would otherwise be required to affect the
repairs, further reducing the risk of injury and derailment. In North
Platte, UP estimates that switching moves have been reduced by at least
20,000 annually (conservative estimate). Further, UP notes that this
in-train wheelset replacement program permits UP to replace
approximately 25 percent more wheelsets than it did using traditional
wheelset placement techniques.
UP explains that cars with defective wheelsets are identified by
wayside defect detectors at various locations before the trains reach
the terminal. These wayside detectors identify the following conditions
requiring wheelset replacements: (1) Wheels causing excessive impacts,
which are measured in kips, or units of 1,000 pounds (currently, AAR
allows carriers to replace wheels exerting impacts of 90 kips or more);
(2) wheels with high flanges, thin flanges, or other geometrical
irregularities; and (3) defective bearings. If left unchecked, any of
these conditions can develop into more advanced defects posing higher
risks of wheel or axle failures, along with undue forces on track
structures leading to rail breaks.
UP states that since the program has been in effect, wheelset
related derailments have decreased. Bearing-related derailments have
also decreased. UP concludes from their data that if the in-train
wheelset program were to stop, there would be four to five additional
wheelset related derailments annually. Moreover, UP believes that most
SCABTs do not reveal any defects. According to UP, a sample of 2008
data indicated that only 12.08 percent of all railcars undergoing
SCABTs on UPs rail network were found to have brake-related defects. UP
notes that for coal cars, the defect was lower yet, at 3.05 percent.
Accordingly, UP asserts that given the low number of defects revealed
by SCABTs and the high safety benefits of in-train wheelset
replacements, there is no justification for requiring SCABTs for the
in-train wheelset replacement program.
While UP seeks relief from performing the many SCABTs associated
with in-train wheelset replacements, UP understands the importance of
complying with the 5-year SCABT requirement. To address this, during
recent years UP has upgraded its information systems to automatically
flag railcars that are due for a 5-year SCABT within 90 days. On
January 1, 2009, the system will flag cars within 6 months of a 5-year
SCABT. UP states that if FRA grants this waiver request, UP will
perform a SCABT on any railcar undergoing an in-train wheelset
replacement that is due for a 5-year SCABT in the following 6 months.
However, UP states that if this relief is not granted, it would be
forced to reduce the number of wheelset replacements it makes, or even
eliminate the in-train wheelset replacement program in some locations.
UP asserts that this would negate the derailment prevention and safety
gains associated with the in-train wheelset replacement program. UP
asserts that the delays and disruption of performing a SCABT on every
car that has not received such a test in the previous 12 months
(roughly 50 percent) would be intolerable. UP also asserts that many of
the mechanical forces that currently perform in-train wheelset
replacements could be displaced. Finally, UP asserts that requiring the
railroad to perform time-consuming and unnecessary SCABTs on railcars
that do not contain FRA-condemnable defects would improperly penalize
UP for its innovative and safety-enhancing in-train wheelset
replacement program, as well as discourage further investment in
emerging technologies including
[[Page 71718]]
wayside and onboard monitoring, and ECP braking.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (Docket No. FRA-2007-28454) and may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 30 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) At the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 19, 2008.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E8-27901 Filed 11-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P