Black Hills National Forest, Bearlodge Ranger District, Sundance, WY-Rattlesnake Forest Management Project, 71600-71601 [E8-27840]
Download as PDF
71600
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 228
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Black Hills National Forest, Bearlodge
Ranger District, Sundance, WY—
Rattlesnake Forest Management
Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Revised Notice of Intent to
Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice of intent revises
the previously published notice of
intent for the Rattlesnake Project (73 FR
65284, Nov. 3, 2008). Due to a printing
error, the previously published notice
contained an incorrect electronic mail
address. This notice corrects the address
and extends the comment due date.
The Forest Service will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
on a proposal to implement multiple
resource management actions in the
Rattlesnake Project Area to implement
the amended Black Hills National Forest
Land and Resource Management Plan.
The proposed action includes
approximately 11,000 acres of
commercial timber harvest, 5,000 acres
of non-commercial vegetation
management, 6,000 acres of prescribed
burning, three miles of road
construction, road improvements, and
watershed improvements. Prescribed
burning is proposed in a roadless area.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
December 22, 2008. The draft EIS is
expected to be available for public
review in March 2009, and the final EIS
is expected to be completed by June
2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Rattlesnake Project, c/o Content
Analysis Group, 172 E. 500 S.,
Bountiful, UT 84010. Fax number: (801)
397–1605. Electronic mail:
bhnf@contentanalysisgroup.com.
Comments may be hand-delivered to the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
Bearlodge Ranger District office, 101
South 21St Street, Sundance, Wyoming,
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Krueger, Resource Planner,
Bearlodge Ranger District, Black Hills
National Forest. Telephone number:
(307) 283–1361.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of and Need for Action
The purpose of actions proposed
under the Rattlesnake Forest
Management Project is to provide
biologically diverse ecosystems, protect
basic resources, and provide for
sustained commodity uses by reducing
crown fire hazard and wildfire threats to
private property, reducing risk of
mountain pine beetle infestation,
producing commercial timber now and
creating conditions for future timber
production, conserving and enhancing
big game winter range, enhancing forest
structural diversity, and conserving and
enhancing late successional landscapes.
Proposed Action
The Rattlesnake Project Area covers
approximately 42,171 acres of National
Forest System land and 3,935 acres of
interspersed private land east of
Sundance, Wyoming. To reduce wildfire
hazard, the Forest Service proposes to
thin pine stands, construct fuel breaks,
reduce fuels adjacent to populated areas
and across the landscape, reduce pine
competition with aspen and birch
stands, and conduct prescribed burning.
To reduce risk of beetle infestation,
activities would include thinning and
regeneration of pine stands. To produce
commercial timber and create
conditions for future timber production,
proposed activities include regeneration
and shelterwood removal in pine
stands, thinning of merchantable and
submerchantable pine, and reduction of
bur oak competition. To conserve and
enhance winter range, activities would
include uneven-age management of pine
stands, reduction of pine and oak
competition with desirable forage, and
prescribed burning. To enhance forest
structural diversity, the proposal
includes regeneration harvest in pine
and conservation of stands that could
develop into late successional forest.
Road construction, repair, and
improvement would occur in support of
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
these activities. New roads would be
closed following harvest, and existing
roads not part of the National Forest
System could also be closed in
conjunction with this project. To
conserve and enhance late successional
landscapes (management area 3.7), the
Forest Service would conduct
prescribed burning. Other proposed
enhancement activities include
watershed improvement through road
and stream rehabilitation.
The Rattlesnake Project Area includes
the 7,944-acre Sand Creek Roadless
Area. Most of the Sand Creek area is
unsuitable for timber harvest, and new
road construction is prohibited in much
of the area by Forest Plan direction,
severely limiting opportunities for
mechanical treatment. The Forest
Service considers access to the area by
commercial equipment impractical at
this time and has chosen to focus on
objectives that could be achieved by
non-commercial means. As a result, the
only action proposed in the Sand Creek
Roadless Area is prescribed burning
(2,386 acres), with the purpose of
promoting late successional forest
attributes.
Background
The Rattlesnake Project area
encompasses the area of the Cement
Project. The Forest Service approved the
Cement Project on February 20, 2004.
The project was litigated. Following a
July 2005 wildfire that substantially
altered forest conditions in the Cement
Project area, the Forest Service
withdrew the project. The complaint
was subsequently dismissed in April
2006.
In the course of the withdrawal of the
Cement Project decision and dismissal
of the complaint, the Forest Service
made several commitments regarding
any new proposal in the Cement Project
Area. These commitments pertained to
addressing certain changed conditions;
developing the range of alternatives; and
soliciting and considering public
comment on the new proposal. The
Forest Service intends to honor these
commitments in the analysis process for
the Rattlesnake Project.
The Rattlesnake Project Area includes
the Cement Project Area but is a new
and separate proposal from the earlier
Cement Project. Initial planning for the
Rattlesnake Project began in October
2007 with a review of existing forest
conditions and amended Forest Plan
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 25, 2008 / Notices
direction for management of the area.
Circumstances affecting National Forest
System lands in the Rattlesnake Project
Area have changed substantially since
2004. (1) The Phase II Amendment to
the Forest Plan was approved on
October 31, 2005. This amendment
altered management direction for the
Black Hills National Forest, including
the Rattlesnake Project area, by adding
broad-scale objectives increasing
management emphasis on hazardous
fuels, forest structural diversity, and
habitat for rare species. These changes
directly affect the type and extent of
vegetation management actions the
Forest Service takes in the Black Hills.
(2) The Cement Fire of July 2005 burned
2,079 acres of National Forest System
land in the Rattlesnake Project area.
Approximately 77 percent of this area
burned at moderate or high intensity,
resulting in the mortality of an
estimated 1,925,300 cubic feet of
sawtimber. (3) Population adjacent to
the Rattlesnake Project Area has
increased in the last four years with
subdivision of the Red Canyon Ranch.
These developments could be affected
by hazardous fuel conditions in the
project area. (4) Mountain pine beetle
populations have increased dramatically
in an area about five miles south of the
Rattlesnake Project area, causing high
levels of pine mortality on several
hundred acres. This infestation has the
potential to spread to the Rattlesnake
area. (5) The Forest Service has issued
new regulations implementing the
National Forest Management Act. These
new regulations replace earlier direction
under which the Cement Project
decision was analyzed and approved.
The new planning regulations make it
clear that they have minimal application
at the project level. This project would
be conducted in accordance with the
requirements of the new regulations.
Responsible Official
Steve Kozel, District Ranger,
Bearlodge Ranger District, Black Hills
National Forest, 101 South 21st Street,
PO Box 680, Sundance, Wyoming
82729.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to
approve the proposed action or
alternatives at this time. No Forest Plan
amendments are proposed.
Scoping Process
Comments and input regarding the
proposed action are being requested
from the public and other interested
parties in conjunction with this notice
of intent. The comment period will be
open for thirty days, beginning on the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:01 Nov 24, 2008
Jkt 217001
date of publication of this notice of
intent. Response to the draft EIS will be
sought from the interested public
beginning approximately in March
2009.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides
development of the environmental
impact statement. It is our desire to
involve interested parties in identifying
the issues related to proposed activities.
Comments will assist in identification of
key issues and opportunities to develop
project alternatives and mitigation
measures.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft EIS will
be prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft EIS will extend 45
days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice
of availability in the Federal Register.
This notice is expected to appear in
February 2009.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft EISs must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)).
Also, environmental objections that
could be raised at the draft EIS stage but
that are not raised until after completion
of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980)). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft EIS. Comments
may also address the adequacy of the
draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the
statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71601
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: November 17, 2008.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8–27840 Filed 11–24–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–533–824
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip from India: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 6, 2008, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register, the preliminary results of this
administrative review of Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
(PET Film). See Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
from India: Preliminary Results of and
Partial Recession the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 73 FR 45699
(August 6, 2008) (Preliminary Results).
The review covers one respondent,
Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal). The
period of review (POR) is July 1, 2006,
through June 30, 2007. We invited
interested parties to submit comments
on our Preliminary Results. Based on
our analysis of the comment received,
we have made a change to our
calculations with respect to the
treatment of duty drawback. For the
final dumping margins see the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 25, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martha Douthit, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 6, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–5050.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 25, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71600-71601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27840]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 228 / Tuesday, November 25, 2008 /
Notices
[[Page 71600]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Black Hills National Forest, Bearlodge Ranger District, Sundance,
WY--Rattlesnake Forest Management Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Revised Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice of intent revises the previously published notice
of intent for the Rattlesnake Project (73 FR 65284, Nov. 3, 2008). Due
to a printing error, the previously published notice contained an
incorrect electronic mail address. This notice corrects the address and
extends the comment due date.
The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact statement
(EIS) on a proposal to implement multiple resource management actions
in the Rattlesnake Project Area to implement the amended Black Hills
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. The proposed action
includes approximately 11,000 acres of commercial timber harvest, 5,000
acres of non-commercial vegetation management, 6,000 acres of
prescribed burning, three miles of road construction, road
improvements, and watershed improvements. Prescribed burning is
proposed in a roadless area.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by December 22, 2008. The draft EIS is expected to be available for
public review in March 2009, and the final EIS is expected to be
completed by June 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Rattlesnake Project, c/o Content
Analysis Group, 172 E. 500 S., Bountiful, UT 84010. Fax number: (801)
397-1605. Electronic mail: bhnf@contentanalysisgroup.com. Comments may
be hand-delivered to the Bearlodge Ranger District office, 101 South
21St Street, Sundance, Wyoming, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Krueger, Resource Planner,
Bearlodge Ranger District, Black Hills National Forest. Telephone
number: (307) 283-1361.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of and Need for Action
The purpose of actions proposed under the Rattlesnake Forest
Management Project is to provide biologically diverse ecosystems,
protect basic resources, and provide for sustained commodity uses by
reducing crown fire hazard and wildfire threats to private property,
reducing risk of mountain pine beetle infestation, producing commercial
timber now and creating conditions for future timber production,
conserving and enhancing big game winter range, enhancing forest
structural diversity, and conserving and enhancing late successional
landscapes.
Proposed Action
The Rattlesnake Project Area covers approximately 42,171 acres of
National Forest System land and 3,935 acres of interspersed private
land east of Sundance, Wyoming. To reduce wildfire hazard, the Forest
Service proposes to thin pine stands, construct fuel breaks, reduce
fuels adjacent to populated areas and across the landscape, reduce pine
competition with aspen and birch stands, and conduct prescribed
burning. To reduce risk of beetle infestation, activities would include
thinning and regeneration of pine stands. To produce commercial timber
and create conditions for future timber production, proposed activities
include regeneration and shelterwood removal in pine stands, thinning
of merchantable and submerchantable pine, and reduction of bur oak
competition. To conserve and enhance winter range, activities would
include uneven-age management of pine stands, reduction of pine and oak
competition with desirable forage, and prescribed burning. To enhance
forest structural diversity, the proposal includes regeneration harvest
in pine and conservation of stands that could develop into late
successional forest. Road construction, repair, and improvement would
occur in support of these activities. New roads would be closed
following harvest, and existing roads not part of the National Forest
System could also be closed in conjunction with this project. To
conserve and enhance late successional landscapes (management area
3.7), the Forest Service would conduct prescribed burning. Other
proposed enhancement activities include watershed improvement through
road and stream rehabilitation.
The Rattlesnake Project Area includes the 7,944-acre Sand Creek
Roadless Area. Most of the Sand Creek area is unsuitable for timber
harvest, and new road construction is prohibited in much of the area by
Forest Plan direction, severely limiting opportunities for mechanical
treatment. The Forest Service considers access to the area by
commercial equipment impractical at this time and has chosen to focus
on objectives that could be achieved by non-commercial means. As a
result, the only action proposed in the Sand Creek Roadless Area is
prescribed burning (2,386 acres), with the purpose of promoting late
successional forest attributes.
Background
The Rattlesnake Project area encompasses the area of the Cement
Project. The Forest Service approved the Cement Project on February 20,
2004. The project was litigated. Following a July 2005 wildfire that
substantially altered forest conditions in the Cement Project area, the
Forest Service withdrew the project. The complaint was subsequently
dismissed in April 2006.
In the course of the withdrawal of the Cement Project decision and
dismissal of the complaint, the Forest Service made several commitments
regarding any new proposal in the Cement Project Area. These
commitments pertained to addressing certain changed conditions;
developing the range of alternatives; and soliciting and considering
public comment on the new proposal. The Forest Service intends to honor
these commitments in the analysis process for the Rattlesnake Project.
The Rattlesnake Project Area includes the Cement Project Area but
is a new and separate proposal from the earlier Cement Project. Initial
planning for the Rattlesnake Project began in October 2007 with a
review of existing forest conditions and amended Forest Plan
[[Page 71601]]
direction for management of the area. Circumstances affecting National
Forest System lands in the Rattlesnake Project Area have changed
substantially since 2004. (1) The Phase II Amendment to the Forest Plan
was approved on October 31, 2005. This amendment altered management
direction for the Black Hills National Forest, including the
Rattlesnake Project area, by adding broad-scale objectives increasing
management emphasis on hazardous fuels, forest structural diversity,
and habitat for rare species. These changes directly affect the type
and extent of vegetation management actions the Forest Service takes in
the Black Hills. (2) The Cement Fire of July 2005 burned 2,079 acres of
National Forest System land in the Rattlesnake Project area.
Approximately 77 percent of this area burned at moderate or high
intensity, resulting in the mortality of an estimated 1,925,300 cubic
feet of sawtimber. (3) Population adjacent to the Rattlesnake Project
Area has increased in the last four years with subdivision of the Red
Canyon Ranch. These developments could be affected by hazardous fuel
conditions in the project area. (4) Mountain pine beetle populations
have increased dramatically in an area about five miles south of the
Rattlesnake Project area, causing high levels of pine mortality on
several hundred acres. This infestation has the potential to spread to
the Rattlesnake area. (5) The Forest Service has issued new regulations
implementing the National Forest Management Act. These new regulations
replace earlier direction under which the Cement Project decision was
analyzed and approved. The new planning regulations make it clear that
they have minimal application at the project level. This project would
be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the new
regulations.
Responsible Official
Steve Kozel, District Ranger, Bearlodge Ranger District, Black
Hills National Forest, 101 South 21st Street, PO Box 680, Sundance,
Wyoming 82729.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to approve the proposed action
or alternatives at this time. No Forest Plan amendments are proposed.
Scoping Process
Comments and input regarding the proposed action are being
requested from the public and other interested parties in conjunction
with this notice of intent. The comment period will be open for thirty
days, beginning on the date of publication of this notice of intent.
Response to the draft EIS will be sought from the interested public
beginning approximately in March 2009.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
development of the environmental impact statement. It is our desire to
involve interested parties in identifying the issues related to
proposed activities. Comments will assist in identification of key
issues and opportunities to develop project alternatives and mitigation
measures.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft EIS will be prepared for comment. The
comment period on the draft EIS will extend 45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. This notice is expected to appear in February
2009.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft EISs must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and contentions (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)). Also, environmental
objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not
raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022
(9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)). Because of these court rulings, it is
very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft EIS. Comments may also address
the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. Comments received, including
the names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part
of the public record on this proposal and will be available for public
inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: November 17, 2008.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8-27840 Filed 11-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M