Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Potomac River, National Harbor, MD, 70871-70873 [E8-27841]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 227 / Monday, November 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
data prior to attempting to transit the
area. Mariners can view the survey at
https://www.saw.usace.army.mil/nav/
OREGON.htm.
(6) Mariners are reminded that the
fendered span of the Herbert C. Bonner
Bridge is the only recommended route
for passing under the bridge. Passing
through any unfendered span presents a
significant hazard to the vessel and the
bridge.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the regulated navigation
area by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. November
7, 2008, through 5 p.m. November 30,
2008.
Dated: November 7, 2008.
J.E. Ryan,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, North Carolina.
[FR Doc. E8–27844 Filed 11–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–0912]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display,
Potomac River, National Harbor, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone upon
specified waters of the Potomac River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during a fireworks display launched
from a discharge barge located at
National Harbor, in Prince Georges
County, Maryland. This safety zone is
intended to protect the maritime public
in a portion of the Potomac River.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6:30
p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on November 28,
2008, and if necessary due to inclement
weather, from 6:30 p.m. through 9:30
p.m. on November 29, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2008–
0912 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: The Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Nov 21, 2008
Jkt 217001
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, and the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road,
Baltimore, Maryland 21226–1791,
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore, at 410–576–
2674 or 410–576–2693. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On September 16, 2008, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ‘‘Safety Zone;
Fireworks Display, Potomac River,
National Harbor, MD’’ in the Federal
Register (73 FR 53398). We received no
letters commenting on the proposed
rule. No public meeting was requested,
and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying its effective date
would be contrary to the public interest,
because immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the maritime public
on the Potomac River against the
hazards associated with fireworks
displays, such as the accidental
discharge of fireworks and falling hot
embers or other debris.
Background and Purpose
Fireworks displays are frequently
held from locations on or near the
navigable waters of the United States.
The accidental discharge of fireworks
and falling hot embers or other debris
are a safety concern during such events.
The Coast Guard has the authority to
impose appropriate controls on marine
events that may pose a threat to persons,
vessels and facilities under its
jurisdiction. The purpose of this rule is
to promote maritime safety, and to
protect mariners transiting the area from
the potential hazards associated with a
fireworks display. The rule is needed to
ensure the safety of the maritime public
in a portion of the waterway that is
expected to be populated by vessel
operators and persons seeking to view
the fireworks display, as well as
mariners operating unknowingly too
close to the fireworks discharge site.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70871
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no
comments in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none
was held. We will implement a
temporary final rule with no changes to
the NPRM.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. This exception is based on the
fact that there is little vessel traffic
associated with recreational boating and
commercial fishing in the area during
the enforcement period. Because the
safety zone lies entirely outside the
federal navigation channel, vessel
operators may transit safely around the
zone. For the above reasons, the Coast
Guard does not anticipate any
significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate, remain or
anchor within certain waters of the
Potomac River, at National Harbor,
Maryland, from 6:30 p.m. through 9:30
p.m. on November 28, 2008, and if
necessary due to inclement weather,
from 6:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on
November 29, 2008. Because the zone is
of limited duration, it is expected that
there will be minimal disruption to the
maritime community. Before the
effective period, the Coast Guard will
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
70872
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 227 / Monday, November 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the river to allow
mariners to make alternative plans for
transiting the affected area. In addition,
smaller vessels not constrained by their
draft, which are more likely to be small
entities, may transit around the safety
zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Nov 21, 2008
Jkt 217001
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded under the Instruction
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation. This rule establishes a
safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–0912 to
read as follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0912 Safety Zone; Fireworks
Display, Potomac River, National Harbor,
MD.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section, Captain of the Port
Baltimore, Maryland means the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore or any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 227 / Monday, November 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
of the Port Baltimore, Maryland to act
on his or her behalf.
(b) Regulated Area. The following
area is a safety zone: All waters of the
Potomac River, surface to bottom,
within an area bounded by a line drawn
from the following points: latitude
38°47′18″ N, longitude 077°01′01″ W;
thence to latitude 38°47′11″ N,
longitude 077°01′26″ W; thence to
latitude 38°47′25″ N, longitude
077°01′33″ W; thence to latitude
38°47′32″ N, longitude 077°01′08″ W;
thence to the point of origin, located at
National Harbor, Maryland. All
coordinates reference North American
Datum 1983.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations governing safety zones,
found in 33 CFR 165.23, apply to the
safety zone described in paragraph (b) of
this section.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
zone is prohibited, unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Baltimore,
Maryland.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the safety zone
must first request authorization from the
Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland
to seek permission to transit the area.
The Captain of the Port Baltimore,
Maryland can be contacted at telephone
number 410–576–2693. The Coast
Guard vessels enforcing this section can
be contacted on Marine Band Radio
VHF Channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the person or vessel shall
proceed as directed. If permission is
granted, all persons or vessels must
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This rule is
effective from 6:30 p.m. through 9:30
p.m. on November 28, 2008, and if
necessary due to inclement weather,
from 6:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on
November 29, 2008.
Dated: October 30, 2008.
Austin J. Gould,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Baltimore, Maryland, Acting.
[FR Doc. E8–27841 Filed 11–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Nov 21, 2008
Jkt 217001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[RI–19–1222c; FRL–8733–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Rhode
Island Update to Materials
Incorporated by Reference
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notice of
administrative change.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is updating the materials
submitted by Rhode Island that are
incorporated by reference (IBR) into the
State implementation plan (SIP). In this
action, EPA is also notifying the public
of the correction of certain
typographical errors within the IBR
Tables. The regulations affected by this
update have been previously submitted
by the Rhode Island Department of
Environmental Management (DEM) and
approved by EPA. This update affects
the SIP materials that are available for
public inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA), the Air and Radiation Docket
and Information Center located at EPA
Headquarters in Washington, DC, and
the Regional Office.
DATES: Effective Date: This action is
effective November 24, 2008.
ADDRESSES: SIP materials which are
incorporated by reference into 40 CFR
part 52 are available for inspection at
the following locations: Environmental
Protection Agency, New England
Regional Office (Region 1), One
Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA
02114–2023; the Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, EPA
Headquarters Library, Room Number
3334, EPA West Building, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460, and the National Archives
and Records Administration. If you
wish to obtain materials from a docket
in the EPA Headquarters Library, please
call the Office of Air and Radiation
(OAR) Docket/Telephone number: (202)
566–1742; or the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Mr.
Donald Cooke, Environmental Scientist,
at the above EPA New England Region
address or at (617) 918–1668 or by
e-mail at cooke.donald@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70873
The SIP is
a living document which the State can
revise as necessary to address its unique
air pollution problems. Therefore, EPA
from time to time must take action on
SIP revisions containing new and/or
revised regulations as being part of the
SIP. On May 22, 1997, (62 FR 27968),
EPA revised the procedures for
incorporation by reference for Federallyapproved SIPs, as a result of
consultations between EPA and the
Office of Federal Register (OFR). The
description of the revised SIP
document, IBR procedures and
‘‘Identification of plan’’ format are
discussed in further detail in the May
22, 1997 Federal Register document. On
August 9, 1999 (64 FR 43083), EPA
published a Federal Register beginning
the new IBR procedure for Rhode
Island. On June 11, 2003 (68 FR 34813)
and July 14, 2006 (71 FR 40014), EPA
published updates to the IBR Material
for Rhode Island.
In this document, EPA is doing the
following:
■ 1. Announcing the update to the
Rhode Island IBR material as of October
15, 2008.
2. Making a correction in the
paragraph 52.2070(c) chart, fifteenth
entry ‘‘Air Pollution Control Regulation
15.’’—Typographic error corrected in
the explanations column by changing
the word ‘‘except’’ to read ‘‘exception’’.
3. Making a correction in the
paragraph 52.2070(d) chart, third entry
‘‘Keene Corporation, East Providence,
RI.’’—Typographic error corrected in the
explanations column by changing
‘‘sixpaper’’ to read ‘‘six paper’’.
3. Making corrections to the date
format listed in paragraphs 52.2070(c),
(d) and (e) charts.—Revise the date
format in the ‘‘state effective date,’’
column as well as the ‘‘EPA approval
date,’’ column for consistency. Dates are
numerical month/day/year without
additional zeros.
4. Making corrections to the
abbreviation for nitrogen oxides in
paragraphs 52.2070(c), (d) and (e)
charts.—Revise the format of the
abbreviation for nitrogen oxides (NOX)
for consistency.
EPA has determined that today’s rule
falls under the ‘‘good cause’’ exemption
in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedures Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
public participation and section
553(d)(3) which allows an agency to
make a rule effective immediately
(thereby avoiding the 30-day delayed
effective date otherwise provided for in
the APA). Today’s rule simply codifies
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 227 (Monday, November 24, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70871-70873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27841]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-0912]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Potomac River, National Harbor,
MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone upon specified
waters of the Potomac River. This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters during a fireworks display
launched from a discharge barge located at National Harbor, in Prince
Georges County, Maryland. This safety zone is intended to protect the
maritime public in a portion of the Potomac River.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on
November 28, 2008, and if necessary due to inclement weather, from 6:30
p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on November 29, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket USCG-2008-0912 and are available online
at https://www.regulations.gov. They are also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and
the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road,
Baltimore, Maryland 21226-1791, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Mr. Ronald L. Houck, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore,
at 410-576-2674 or 410-576-2693. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On September 16, 2008, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Potomac River,
National Harbor, MD'' in the Federal Register (73 FR 53398). We
received no letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying its effective date would
be contrary to the public interest, because immediate action is needed
to ensure the safety of the maritime public on the Potomac River
against the hazards associated with fireworks displays, such as the
accidental discharge of fireworks and falling hot embers or other
debris.
Background and Purpose
Fireworks displays are frequently held from locations on or near
the navigable waters of the United States. The accidental discharge of
fireworks and falling hot embers or other debris are a safety concern
during such events. The Coast Guard has the authority to impose
appropriate controls on marine events that may pose a threat to
persons, vessels and facilities under its jurisdiction. The purpose of
this rule is to promote maritime safety, and to protect mariners
transiting the area from the potential hazards associated with a
fireworks display. The rule is needed to ensure the safety of the
maritime public in a portion of the waterway that is expected to be
populated by vessel operators and persons seeking to view the fireworks
display, as well as mariners operating unknowingly too close to the
fireworks discharge site.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no comments in response to the NPRM. No
public meeting was requested and none was held. We will implement a
temporary final rule with no changes to the NPRM.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. This exception is based on the fact that
there is little vessel traffic associated with recreational boating and
commercial fishing in the area during the enforcement period. Because
the safety zone lies entirely outside the federal navigation channel,
vessel operators may transit safely around the zone. For the above
reasons, the Coast Guard does not anticipate any significant economic
impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule would affect the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending
to operate, remain or anchor within certain waters of the Potomac
River, at National Harbor, Maryland, from 6:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m.
on November 28, 2008, and if necessary due to inclement weather, from
6:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on November 29, 2008. Because the zone is
of limited duration, it is expected that there will be minimal
disruption to the maritime community. Before the effective period, the
Coast Guard will
[[Page 70872]]
issue maritime advisories widely available to users of the river to
allow mariners to make alternative plans for transiting the affected
area. In addition, smaller vessels not constrained by their draft,
which are more likely to be small entities, may transit around the
safety zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
under the Instruction that there are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule establishes a safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-0912 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0912 Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Potomac River,
National Harbor, MD.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, Captain of the
Port Baltimore, Maryland means the Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
[[Page 70873]]
of the Port Baltimore, Maryland to act on his or her behalf.
(b) Regulated Area. The following area is a safety zone: All waters
of the Potomac River, surface to bottom, within an area bounded by a
line drawn from the following points: latitude 38[deg]47'18'' N,
longitude 077[deg]01'01'' W; thence to latitude 38[deg]47'11'' N,
longitude 077[deg]01'26'' W; thence to latitude 38[deg]47'25'' N,
longitude 077[deg]01'33'' W; thence to latitude 38[deg]47'32'' N,
longitude 077[deg]01'08'' W; thence to the point of origin, located at
National Harbor, Maryland. All coordinates reference North American
Datum 1983.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations governing safety
zones, found in 33 CFR 165.23, apply to the safety zone described in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited, unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
safety zone must first request authorization from the Captain of the
Port Baltimore, Maryland to seek permission to transit the area. The
Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland can be contacted at telephone
number 410-576-2693. The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can
be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF Channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing
light or other means, the person or vessel shall proceed as directed.
If permission is granted, all persons or vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This rule is effective from 6:30 p.m.
through 9:30 p.m. on November 28, 2008, and if necessary due to
inclement weather, from 6:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on November 29,
2008.
Dated: October 30, 2008.
Austin J. Gould,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland,
Acting.
[FR Doc. E8-27841 Filed 11-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P