Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Tennessee; Approval of Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan-“Permit by Rule” Provision, 70881-70883 [E8-27739]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 227 / Monday, November 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
70881
RHODE ISLAND NON REGULATORY—Continued
Name of non regulatory SIP provision
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
State submittal date/
effective date
November 9, 1999,
letter from Rhode
Island Department
of Environmental
Management.
Negative Declaration
for Aerospace Coating Operations Control Techniques
Guideline Category.
September 20, 2001
letter from Rhode
Island Department
of Environment
Management.
NOX State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Call Narrative, revised September
2001.
Statewide ...................
Submitted 11/9/1999 ..
12/27/2000, 65 FR
81743.
Statewide ...................
Submitted 3/28/2000 ..
7/10/2000, 65 FR
42290.
Statewide ...................
Submitted 9/20/2001 ..
6/20/2003, 68 FR
36921.
Statewide ...................
Submitted 9/20/2001 ..
6/20/2003, 68 FR
36921.
[FR Doc. E8–27864 Filed 11–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2008–0052–200803(a);
FRL–8743–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Tennessee; Approval of Revisions to
the Knox County Portion of the
Tennessee State Implementation
Plan—‘‘Permit by Rule’’ Provision
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Tennessee on
October 12, 2007. The revision pertains
to the Knox County portion of the
Tennessee SIP and includes changes to
Knox County Air Quality Management
Regulation (Knox County Regulation)
Section 25.10—Permit by Rule.
Specifically, Section 25.10 was changed
so that it clearly states that turbines and
other internal combustion engines are
excluded from the ‘‘Permit by Rule’’
provision. This revision is considered
by the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation (TDEC),
to be as or more stringent than the State
of Tennessee’s SIP requirements. This
action is being taken pursuant to section
110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Nov 21, 2008
Jkt 217001
EPA approved date
This direct final rule is effective
January 23, 2009 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment
by December 24, 2008. If EPA receives
such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2008–0052, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: bradley.twunjala@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2008–
0052,’’ Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Twunjala
Bradley, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2008–
0052.’’ EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanations
Stating RI’s intent to comply with applicable
reporting requirements.
Submitting the ‘‘NOX State Implementation
Plan (SIP) Call Narrative,’’ revised September 2001.
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
70882
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 227 / Monday, November 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9352.
Ms. Bradley can also be reached via
electronic mail at
bradley.twunjala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
I. Analysis of Submittal
On October 12, 2007, the State of
Tennessee submitted a revision to the
Knox County portion of the Tennessee
SIP. This revision changes Knox County
Regulation Sections 25.10.B.1.a and
25.10.B.2.a, so that these sections
clearly state that turbines and other
internal combustion engines are
excluded from the ‘‘Permit by Rule’’
provision. The intent of the ‘‘Permit by
Rule’’ provision is to provide a simple
compliance technique to limit a
facility’s potential emissions below that
of the ‘‘major source’’ threshold, with
respect to title V of the CAA. The
‘‘Permit by Rule’’ provision operates by
using fuel loads to ensure that a source
will not exceed the major source
thresholds. Since internal combustion
units and turbines emit more pollutant
per fuel load than external combustion
units, they are excluded from this
‘‘Permit by Rule’’ compliance technique
and must instead follow the standard
permitting approach.
II. Final Action
EPA is taking direct final action to
approve the aforementioned changes
into the SIP. EPA is publishing this rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Nov 21, 2008
Jkt 217001
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should adverse comments be filed. This
rule will be effective January 23, 2009
without further notice unless the
Agency receives adverse comments by
December 24, 2008.
If EPA receives such comments, then
EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Parties
interested in commenting should do so
at this time. If no such comments are
received, the public is advised that this
rule will be effective on January 23,
2009 and no further action will be taken
on the proposed rule.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 23, 2009. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Incorporation by reference,
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
70883
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 227 / Monday, November 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Dated: November 10, 2008.
Russell L. Wright,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
■
the Tennessee State Implementation
Plan by revising the entry for Section
25.0 to read as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
§ 52.2220
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
*
Subpart RR—Tennessee
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended in
Table 3 of the Knox County portion of
■
TABLE 3—EPA APPROVED KNOX COUNTY, REGULATIONS
State effective
date
State citation
Title/subject
*
Section 25.0 .....................
*
*
Permits .............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0590; FRL–8732–4]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Imperial County
Air Pollution Control District, Mojave
Desert Air Quality Management
District, South Coast Air Quality
Management District, and Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the
Imperial County Air Pollution Control
District (ICAPCD), Mojave Desert Air
Quality Management District
(MDAQMD), South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), and
Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District (VCAPCD) portions of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions
from storage of reactive organic
compound liquids, polyester resin
operations, coatings of metal parts and
products, and adhesives and sealants.
We are approving local rules that
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on January
23, 2009 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by
December 24, 2008. If we receive such
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:21 Nov 21, 2008
Jkt 217001
*
*
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that this direct final
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2008–0590, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send e-mail
directly to EPA, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the public comment.
If EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
PO 00000
Explanation
*
*
*
12/10/2007 11/24/2008 [Insert citation of publication].
*
[FR Doc. E8–27739 Filed 11–21–08; 8:45 am]
EPA approval date
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions regarding ICAPCD Rule 414,
contact Mae Wang, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4124, wang.mae@epa.gov. For
questions regarding MDAQMD Rule
1162, contact Jerald Wamsley, EPA
Region IX, (415) 947–4111,
wamsley.jerry@epa.gov. For questions
regarding SCAQMD Rule 1107 or
VCAPCD Rule 74.20, contact Francisco
´˜
Donez, EPA Region IX, (213) 244–1834,
Donez.Francisco@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations to Further
Improve the Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules we are
approving with the dates that they were
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 227 (Monday, November 24, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70881-70883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27739]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2008-0052-200803(a); FRL-8743-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Tennessee; Approval of Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the
Tennessee State Implementation Plan--``Permit by Rule'' Provision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Tennessee
on October 12, 2007. The revision pertains to the Knox County portion
of the Tennessee SIP and includes changes to Knox County Air Quality
Management Regulation (Knox County Regulation) Section 25.10--Permit by
Rule. Specifically, Section 25.10 was changed so that it clearly states
that turbines and other internal combustion engines are excluded from
the ``Permit by Rule'' provision. This revision is considered by the
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), to be as
or more stringent than the State of Tennessee's SIP requirements. This
action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: This direct final rule is effective January 23, 2009 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by December 24,
2008. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2008-0052, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: bradley.twunjala@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2008-0052,'' Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. ``EPA-R04-OAR-
2008-0052.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is
[[Page 70882]]
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is (404) 562-9352. Ms. Bradley can also be reached via electronic mail
at bradley.twunjala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Analysis of Submittal
On October 12, 2007, the State of Tennessee submitted a revision to
the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP. This revision changes
Knox County Regulation Sections 25.10.B.1.a and 25.10.B.2.a, so that
these sections clearly state that turbines and other internal
combustion engines are excluded from the ``Permit by Rule'' provision.
The intent of the ``Permit by Rule'' provision is to provide a simple
compliance technique to limit a facility's potential emissions below
that of the ``major source'' threshold, with respect to title V of the
CAA. The ``Permit by Rule'' provision operates by using fuel loads to
ensure that a source will not exceed the major source thresholds. Since
internal combustion units and turbines emit more pollutant per fuel
load than external combustion units, they are excluded from this
``Permit by Rule'' compliance technique and must instead follow the
standard permitting approach.
II. Final Action
EPA is taking direct final action to approve the aforementioned
changes into the SIP. EPA is publishing this rule without prior
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal
and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules
section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP
revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective
January 23, 2009 without further notice unless the Agency receives
adverse comments by December 24, 2008.
If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on January 23, 2009 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 23, 2009. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Incorporation by reference,
[[Page 70883]]
Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 10, 2008.
Russell L. Wright,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR--Tennessee
0
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended in Table 3 of the Knox County portion
of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan by revising the entry for
Section 25.0 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 3--EPA Approved Knox County, Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 25.0..................... Permits............ 12/10/2007 11/24/2008 [Insert
citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * 9
[FR Doc. E8-27739 Filed 11-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P