Solicitation of Interest for Transmission Line Projects Under EPAct05 Section 1222 Associated With Renewable Generation Sources, 70638-70639 [E8-27721]
Download as PDF
70638
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 226 / Friday, November 21, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Solicitation of Interest for
Transmission Line Projects Under
EPAct05 Section 1222 Associated With
Renewable Generation Sources
United States Department of
Energy, Western Area Power
Administration.
ACTION: Request for Statements of
Interest.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Department
of Energy (DOE or Department), acting
through the Western Area Power
Administration (Western), a power
marketing administration within the
Department, is seeking Statements of
Interest (SOIs) from entities that are
interested in providing contributed
funds for Western’s participation in the
upgrade of Western’s existing
transmission facilities or the
construction of new transmission line
projects in the states in which Western
operates. The purpose of the request for
SOIs is to identify potential projects
which would facilitate the transmission
of wind generation or other renewable
generation sources to load centers under
the authority granted the Secretary of
Energy in section 1222 of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct05) (Pub. L.
109–58; 119 Stat. 952).
DATES: To be assured of consideration,
all SOIs should be received by Western
by January 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: SOIs should be mailed to:
Ms. Laverne Kyriss, Senior Planning
Advisor, Corporate Services Office,
Western Area Power Administration,
P.O. Box 281213, Lakewood, CO 80228–
8213. SOIs may also be e-mailed to
kyriss@wapa.gov.
For
further information concerning the
SOIs, contact: Ms. Laverne Kyriss,
Senior Planning Advisor, Corporate
Services Office, Western Area Power
Administration, P.O. Box 281213,
Lakewood, CO 80228–8213, telephone
(720) 962–7170, e-mail
kyriss@wapa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pursuant
to section 9(c) of the Reclamation
Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c))
and section 5 of the Flood Control Act
of 1944 (16 U.S.C. 825s), Western, a
DOE agency, markets and transmits
wholesale electrical power from 57
power generation facilities owned and
operated primarily by the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers to cooperatives, Native
American tribes, government agencies,
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Nov 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
and municipalities. Western markets
power over 17,000 miles of high-voltage
transmission lines in the states of
Arizona, California, Colorado, Iowa,
Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska,
Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota,
South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and
Wyoming. Western operates in these 15
states under federal reclamation law and
may receive funds under the
Contributed Funds Act (43 U.S.C. 395)
to fund work for operations permitted
under reclamation law, i.e. projects that
are used to transport federally produced
electricity.
Since 2005, the Secretary of Energy
(Secretary), acting through the
Administrators of Western or the
Southwestern Power Administration
(Southwestern), has had the authority to
accept contributed funds under section
1222(c) of EPAct05 to design, develop,
construct, operate, maintain, or own, or
participate with other entities in
designing, developing, constructing,
operating, maintaining, or owning, an
electric power transmission facility and
related facilities needed to upgrade
existing transmission facilities owned
by Western and Southwestern if the
electric transmission facilities are
located in a national interest electric
transmission corridor designated
pursuant to section 216 of the Federal
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824o), or are
necessary to accommodate an actual or
projected increase in demand for
electric transmission capacity. Section
1222(b) of EPAct05 gives the Secretary,
acting through the Administrators of
Western or Southwestern, authority for
developing new electric transmission
facilities, similar to that provided in
section 1222(a) for existing facilities, in
states in which Western and
Southwestern operate. Section 1222(c)
provides for the Secretary to accept and
use funds contributed by another entity
for the purpose of carrying out a project.
Section 1222(g) of EPAct05 provides
that through September 30, 2015, the
Secretary may accept no more than $100
million from other entities for use in
developing projects. In order to exercise
these authorities, the Secretary, in
consultation with the applicable
Administrator, must make certain
determinations provided in section 1222
of EPAct05 with respect to the project.
Given the economic, environmental,
and national security benefits flowing
from the use of electricity generated
from renewable energy resources,
Western is seeking SOIs from entities
that are interested in providing
contributed funds for Western’s
participation in the design,
development, construction, operation,
maintenance, or ownership of upgraded
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or new transmission projects that would
facilitate the transmission of wind
generation or other renewable
generation sources from remote
locations to distant load centers. While
Western will consider all projects
outlined in the SOIs received for
ultimate recommendation to the
Secretary, there are specific existing
electric transmission corridors that
currently contain Western transmission
facilities (both transmission lines and
intermediate substations) that could
transmit significant quantities of
electricity generated from renewable
resources to load centers if upgrades to
existing facilities were made or new
facilities built. These include:
1. Antelope Valley Substation in westcentral North Dakota to Sioux City
Substation in western Iowa
(approximately 700 miles);
2. Miracle Mile Substation in central
Wyoming to Stegall Substation in
western Nebraska (approximately 200
miles), continuing about 100 miles to
Ault Substation in northern Colorado;
and
3. Mead Substation in southern
Nevada to Gila Substation in
southwestern Arizona (approximately
250 miles).
SOIs submitted with respect to the
facilities outlined above, or any other
proposed upgrade or new transmission
projects should include the following
information:
1. Name and general description of
the entity submitting the SOI.
2. Name, mailing address, telephone
number, facsimile number, and e-mail
address of that entity’s primary contact.
3. A description of the proposed
transmission project including project
location (location must be within states
in which Western operates), minimum
transfer capability, descriptions of any
previous transmission work done for the
proposed project (plan of service, cost
estimate, schedule, system studies,
environmental activity, siting activity,
etc.), and any other information that
would be useful in evaluating the
proposed transmission project.
4. Description of the renewable energy
resources the proposed project would
serve, including type(s) of renewable
resource, size and general location of
the resource, general location of load or
markets, availability of generationrelated ancillary services, a description
of the entity’s involvement in the
renewable energy resource, if any, and
any other information that would be
useful in evaluating the project.
5. Amount of transmission rights or
long-term transmission service the
entity may desire if and when the
project is completed.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 226 / Friday, November 21, 2008 / Notices
6. The proposed role that Western
might play in the development of the
transmission project.
7. The amount of funds the entity
might be willing to contribute to
Western to accomplish its role.
8. A brief description of any other
information that would be useful in
evaluating the SOI. Each SOI will be
evaluated by Western based on the
feasibility of developing a project that
meets the criteria set forth in EPAct05
section 1222, while advancing the goal
of facilitating the transmission of wind
generation or other renewable
generation sources from remote
locations to distant load centers. Given
the $100 million limit through
September 30, 2015, on the Secretary’s
authority to accept contributed funds,
the SOIs received in response to this
request, and the request for SOIs
simultaneously being issued by
Southwestern, will be evaluated through
a competitive evaluation process.
Environmental Compliance
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40
CFR parts 1500–1508); and DOE NEPA
Implementing Procedures and
Guidelines (10 CFR part 1021), Western
has determined this action is
categorically excluded from further
NEPA analysis. Future actions that the
Secretary and Western may undertake
under EPAct05 section 1222 as a result
of this request will undergo separate
NEPA analysis on a project by project
basis.
Dated: November 13, 2008.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8–27721 Filed 11–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–8587–8]
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7146. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:24 Nov 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 6, 2008 (73 FR 19833).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20080319, ERP No. D–FAA–
L40234–AK, Sitka Rocky Gutierrez
Airport Master Plan, Improvements to
the Runway Safety Area, Taxiway.
Seaplane Pullout, Approach Lighting
System, and the Seawall, U.S. Army
COE Section 10 and 404 Permits,
NPDES Permit, AK.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about water
quality and stormwater impacts and the
mitigation of those impacts. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20080331, ERP No. D–NOA–
L91032–00, Proposed Acceptable
Biological Catch (ABC) and Optimum
Yield (OY) Specifications and
Management Measures for the 2009–
2010 Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan, Implementation,
WA, OR and CA.
Summary: While EPA has no
objection to the proposed action, EPA
did request clarification on monitoring
and catch limits. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20080361, ERP No. DS–USA–
K11038–HI, Makua Military
Reservation (MMR) Project, Proposed
Military Training Activities, To
Conduct the Necessary Type, Level,
Duration, and Intensity of Live-Fire
and other Military Training Activities,
in Particular Company-Level
Combined-Arms, Live-Fire Exercises
(CALFEX), 25th Infantry Division
(Light) and U.S. Army, HI.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about impacts
to soil and water from weapons-related
contaminants. Rating EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20080305, ERP No. F–CGD–
E02013–AL, Bienville Offshore Energy
Terminal (BOET) Deepwater Port
License Application (Docket # USCG–
2006–24644), Proposes to Construct and
Operate a Liquefied Natural Gas
Receiving and Degasification Facility,
Outer Continental Shelf of the Gulf of
Mexico, South of Fort Morgan, AL.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental objections about marine
fish larvae impacts and impacts to hard
bottom habitats from pipeline
installation.
EIS No. 20080403, ERP No. F–FHW–
J40182–UT, Layton Interchange Project,
Improvements on I–15 (Exit-330) to
Provide Unrestricted Access Across the
Unicon Pacific Railroad and to Address
Traffic Congestion on Gentile St. in
West Layton, Layton City, UT.
Summary: EPA’s previous issues have
been resolved; therefore, EPA does not
object to the proposed action.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70639
EIS No. 20080406, ERP No. F–BIA–
J01082–MT, Absaloka Mine Crow
Reservation South Extension Coal Lease
Approval, Proposed Mine Development
Plan, and Related Federal and State
Permitting Actions, Crow Indian
Reservation, Crow Tribe, Bighorn
County, MT.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: November 18, 2008.
Dawn R. Roberts,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. E8–27730 Filed 11–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–8587–7]
Environmental Impact Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–1399 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 11/10/2008 Through 11/14/2008
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20080464, Draft Supplement,
AFS, MN, Echo Trail Area Forest
Management Project, Updated
Information to Further Address Water
Quality and Watershed Health,
Superior National Forest, Lacroix
Ranger District and Kawishiwi Ranger
District, St. Louis and Lake Counties,
MN, Comment Period Ends: 01/05/
2009, Contact: Carol Booth, 218–666–
0020.
EIS No. 20080465, Final EIS, AFS, WY,
Battle Park Cattle and Horse (C&H)
and Mistymoon Sheep and Goat (S&G)
Allotment Project, Proposes to
Continue Livestock Grazing on both
Allotments, Powder River District
Ranger, Bighorn National Forest,
Bighorn County, WY, Wait Period
Ends: 12/22/2008, Contact: Mark
Booth 307–684–7806.
EIS No. 20080466, Final EIS, USN, 00,
Introduction of the P–8A MMA into
the U.S. Navy Fleet, To Provide
Facilities and Functions that Support
the Homebasing of 12 P–8A MultiMission Maritime Aircraft (MMA)
Fleet Squardrons (72 Aircraft) and one
Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS),
which include the Following
Installations: Naval Air Station
Jacksonville, FL; Naval Air Station
Whidbey Island, WA; Naval Air
Station North Island, CA; Marine
Corps Base, HI and Kaneohe Bay, HI,
Wait Period Ends: 12/22/2008,
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 226 (Friday, November 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70638-70639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27721]
[[Page 70638]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Solicitation of Interest for Transmission Line Projects Under
EPAct05 Section 1222 Associated With Renewable Generation Sources
AGENCY: United States Department of Energy, Western Area Power
Administration.
ACTION: Request for Statements of Interest.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Department of Energy (DOE or Department),
acting through the Western Area Power Administration (Western), a power
marketing administration within the Department, is seeking Statements
of Interest (SOIs) from entities that are interested in providing
contributed funds for Western's participation in the upgrade of
Western's existing transmission facilities or the construction of new
transmission line projects in the states in which Western operates. The
purpose of the request for SOIs is to identify potential projects which
would facilitate the transmission of wind generation or other renewable
generation sources to load centers under the authority granted the
Secretary of Energy in section 1222 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPAct05) (Pub. L. 109-58; 119 Stat. 952).
DATES: To be assured of consideration, all SOIs should be received by
Western by January 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: SOIs should be mailed to: Ms. Laverne Kyriss, Senior
Planning Advisor, Corporate Services Office, Western Area Power
Administration, P.O. Box 281213, Lakewood, CO 80228-8213. SOIs may also
be e-mailed to kyriss@wapa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information concerning the
SOIs, contact: Ms. Laverne Kyriss, Senior Planning Advisor, Corporate
Services Office, Western Area Power Administration, P.O. Box 281213,
Lakewood, CO 80228-8213, telephone (720) 962-7170, e-mail
kyriss@wapa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 9(c) of the Reclamation
Project Act of 1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(c)) and section 5 of the Flood
Control Act of 1944 (16 U.S.C. 825s), Western, a DOE agency, markets
and transmits wholesale electrical power from 57 power generation
facilities owned and operated primarily by the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to cooperatives,
Native American tribes, government agencies, and municipalities.
Western markets power over 17,000 miles of high-voltage transmission
lines in the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas,
Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South
Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming. Western operates in these 15 states
under federal reclamation law and may receive funds under the
Contributed Funds Act (43 U.S.C. 395) to fund work for operations
permitted under reclamation law, i.e. projects that are used to
transport federally produced electricity.
Since 2005, the Secretary of Energy (Secretary), acting through the
Administrators of Western or the Southwestern Power Administration
(Southwestern), has had the authority to accept contributed funds under
section 1222(c) of EPAct05 to design, develop, construct, operate,
maintain, or own, or participate with other entities in designing,
developing, constructing, operating, maintaining, or owning, an
electric power transmission facility and related facilities needed to
upgrade existing transmission facilities owned by Western and
Southwestern if the electric transmission facilities are located in a
national interest electric transmission corridor designated pursuant to
section 216 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824o), or are necessary
to accommodate an actual or projected increase in demand for electric
transmission capacity. Section 1222(b) of EPAct05 gives the Secretary,
acting through the Administrators of Western or Southwestern, authority
for developing new electric transmission facilities, similar to that
provided in section 1222(a) for existing facilities, in states in which
Western and Southwestern operate. Section 1222(c) provides for the
Secretary to accept and use funds contributed by another entity for the
purpose of carrying out a project. Section 1222(g) of EPAct05 provides
that through September 30, 2015, the Secretary may accept no more than
$100 million from other entities for use in developing projects. In
order to exercise these authorities, the Secretary, in consultation
with the applicable Administrator, must make certain determinations
provided in section 1222 of EPAct05 with respect to the project.
Given the economic, environmental, and national security benefits
flowing from the use of electricity generated from renewable energy
resources, Western is seeking SOIs from entities that are interested in
providing contributed funds for Western's participation in the design,
development, construction, operation, maintenance, or ownership of
upgraded or new transmission projects that would facilitate the
transmission of wind generation or other renewable generation sources
from remote locations to distant load centers. While Western will
consider all projects outlined in the SOIs received for ultimate
recommendation to the Secretary, there are specific existing electric
transmission corridors that currently contain Western transmission
facilities (both transmission lines and intermediate substations) that
could transmit significant quantities of electricity generated from
renewable resources to load centers if upgrades to existing facilities
were made or new facilities built. These include:
1. Antelope Valley Substation in west-central North Dakota to Sioux
City Substation in western Iowa (approximately 700 miles);
2. Miracle Mile Substation in central Wyoming to Stegall Substation
in western Nebraska (approximately 200 miles), continuing about 100
miles to Ault Substation in northern Colorado; and
3. Mead Substation in southern Nevada to Gila Substation in
southwestern Arizona (approximately 250 miles).
SOIs submitted with respect to the facilities outlined above, or
any other proposed upgrade or new transmission projects should include
the following information:
1. Name and general description of the entity submitting the SOI.
2. Name, mailing address, telephone number, facsimile number, and
e-mail address of that entity's primary contact.
3. A description of the proposed transmission project including
project location (location must be within states in which Western
operates), minimum transfer capability, descriptions of any previous
transmission work done for the proposed project (plan of service, cost
estimate, schedule, system studies, environmental activity, siting
activity, etc.), and any other information that would be useful in
evaluating the proposed transmission project.
4. Description of the renewable energy resources the proposed
project would serve, including type(s) of renewable resource, size and
general location of the resource, general location of load or markets,
availability of generation-related ancillary services, a description of
the entity's involvement in the renewable energy resource, if any, and
any other information that would be useful in evaluating the project.
5. Amount of transmission rights or long-term transmission service
the entity may desire if and when the project is completed.
[[Page 70639]]
6. The proposed role that Western might play in the development of
the transmission project.
7. The amount of funds the entity might be willing to contribute to
Western to accomplish its role.
8. A brief description of any other information that would be
useful in evaluating the SOI. Each SOI will be evaluated by Western
based on the feasibility of developing a project that meets the
criteria set forth in EPAct05 section 1222, while advancing the goal of
facilitating the transmission of wind generation or other renewable
generation sources from remote locations to distant load centers. Given
the $100 million limit through September 30, 2015, on the Secretary's
authority to accept contributed funds, the SOIs received in response to
this request, and the request for SOIs simultaneously being issued by
Southwestern, will be evaluated through a competitive evaluation
process.
Environmental Compliance
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508); and DOE
NEPA Implementing Procedures and Guidelines (10 CFR part 1021), Western
has determined this action is categorically excluded from further NEPA
analysis. Future actions that the Secretary and Western may undertake
under EPAct05 section 1222 as a result of this request will undergo
separate NEPA analysis on a project by project basis.
Dated: November 13, 2008.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E8-27721 Filed 11-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P