Request for Public Comments on the Prospect of Removing 7A Commodities From De Minimis Eligibility, 70322-70323 [E8-27588]
Download as PDF
70322
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 225 / Thursday, November 20, 2008 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 7845,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Diane Rodriguez, Program
Analyst, Performance and National
Programs Division, Room 7009,
Economic Development Administration,
Washington, DC 20230, telephone (202)
482–4495, facsimile (202) 482–2838 (or
via the Internet at
drodriguez@eda.doc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Economic Development
Administration (EDA) administers the
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms
Program, which is authorized by
chapters 3 and 5 of title II of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2341
et seq.) (Trade Act). EDA certifies firms
as eligible to apply for Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA), provides
technical adjustment assistance to firms
and other recipients, and provides
assistance to organizations representing
trade injured industries. In order to
certify a firm as eligible to apply for
TAA, EDA must verify: (1) A significant
reduction in the number or proportion
of the workers in the firm, a reduction
in the workers’ wage or work hours, or
an imminent threat of such reductions;
(2) sales or production of the firm have
decreased absolutely, as defined in
EDA’s regulations, or sales or
production, or both, of any article
accounting for at least twenty-five (25)
percent of the firm’s sales or production
have decreased absolutely; and (3) an
increase in imports of articles like or
directly competitive with those
produced by the petitioning firm, which
has contributed importantly to the
decline in employment and sales or
production of that firm. Additionally,
the firm must demonstrate that U.S.
customers have reduced or declined
purchases from the firm in favor of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
buying imported items. EDA uses
information collected from Form ED–
840P, and its attachments, to determine
if a firm is eligible to apply for TAA.
The use of the form standardizes and
limits the information collected as part
of the certification process and eases the
burden on applicants and reviewers
alike.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
II. Method of Collection
AGENCY:
The ED–840P form is downloadable
from EDA’s Web site at https://
www.eda.gov/InvestmentsGrants/
Directives.xml and can be e-mailed or
submitted in hard copy to EDA.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0610–0091.
Form Number(s): ED–840P.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
200.
Estimated Time per Response: 8
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,600.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: November 14, 2008.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E8–27558 Filed 11–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 0810231385–81390–01]
Request for Public Comments on the
Prospect of Removing 7A
Commodities From De Minimis
Eligibility
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security (BIS) is seeking public
comment on the prospect of removing
from de minimis eligibility commodities
controlled for missile technology (MT)
reasons under Category 7—Product
Group A on the Commerce Control List
except when the 7A commodities are
incorporated as standard equipment in
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
(or national equivalent) certified civilian
transport aircraft. If such a policy were
implemented, foreign made items that
incorporate U.S.-origin 7A commodities
would be subject to the Export
Administration Regulations, except
when the 7A commodities are
incorporated as standard equipment in
FAA (or national equivalent) certified
civilian transport aircraft. Specifically,
BIS is seeking public input on the
impact such a change would have on
U.S. manufacturers of category 7A
commodities, as well as the impact such
a change would have on foreign
manufacturers that incorporate U.S.origin 7A commodities into their
foreign-made products.
DATES: Comments must be received no
later than January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted via https://
www.regulations.gov, by e-mail directly
to BIS at publiccomments@bis.doc.gov
or on paper to U.S. Department of
Commerce, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Regulatory Policy Division,
Room H–2705, Washington DC 20230.
Please input ‘‘7A/De minimis’’ in the
subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharron Cook, Office of Exporter
Services, Regulatory Policy Division,
Bureau of Industry and Security at 202–
482–2440, or fax 202–482–3355, or email at scook@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The term ‘‘de minimis’’ generally
refers to matters that are of minor
significance. The de minimis provisions
of the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) promote U.S. export
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 225 / Thursday, November 20, 2008 / Notices
control objectives as set forth in the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as
amended, (EAA) while limiting U.S.
jurisdiction over non-U.S. products
containing a de minimis percentage, by
value, of U.S. content. To prevent the
diversion of controlled U.S. items and
foreign-made items incorporating a
significant amount of U.S. content, a
foreign-made item that contains more
than the de minimis amount of
controlled U.S.-origin content by value
is subject to the EAR, i.e., a license may
be required from BIS for the export
abroad to another foreign country or incountry transfer of the foreign-made
item. Prior to March 1987, the EAR set
no de minimis levels for U.S. content in
foreign-made items; foreign-made items
were subject to the EAR if they
contained any amount of U.S.-origin
content, no matter how small. A rule
published March 23, 1987 (52 FR 9147)
revised what were then called the ‘‘parts
and components’’ provisions to
establish thresholds at which the
amount of U.S.-origin commodities in
foreign-made items would warrant
exercise of U.S. jurisdiction over the
foreign-made item when located outside
the United States. The rule was
established to alleviate a major trade
dispute with allies who strenuously
objected to U.S. assertion of jurisdiction
over all reexports of non-U.S. items that
contained even small amounts of U.S.
content. A major revision of the EAR in
1996 (61 FR 12714) introduced the term
‘‘de minimis’’ and established de
minimis thresholds for software and
technology. The most recent revisions to
the de minimis rules occurred on
October 1, 2008, when BIS published a
rule to change the de minimis
calculation for foreign produced
hardware bundled with U.S.-origin
software, clarify the definition of
‘incorporate’ as it is applied to the de
minimis rules, and to make certain other
changes.
Commodities controlled by Category
7—Product Group A in the Commerce
Control List are certain equipment and
components related to navigation and
avionics. Reviewing agencies have
raised concerns that such commodities,
when controlled for MT reasons, have
the potential to provide a foreign
product with unique military
capabilities, even if the value of the
commodity is below normal de minimis
levels. Airline and national aviation
safety controls help to minimize the risk
of diversion for Category 7—Product
Group A commodities installed in
civilian aircraft. It is expected the
commodities will remain in the aircraft
and free from tampering with such
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
safety controls. However, when the
commodities are exported in less costly
end items with no national aviation
safety authority controls, there may be
a higher risk of diversion.
Requests for Comments
BIS is seeking public comments on
the expected impact on U.S.
manufacturers of commodities
controlled by Category 7—Product
Group A, as well as the expected impact
on foreign manufacturers that
incorporate U.S.-origin 7A commodities
into their foreign-made products, if BIS
were to remove from de minimis
eligibility commodities controlled for
MT reasons under Category 7—Product
Group A, except when the commodities
are incorporated as standard equipment
in FAA (or national equivalent) certified
civilian transport aircraft. Specific
estimates related to number of exports,
revenue, jobs, etc. that would be
affected would be very useful. Also, the
impact such a change would have on
decisions to incorporate U.S.-origin
items in future foreign products would
also be useful. Examples of commercial
foreign products that incorporate
commodities controlled by Category 7—
Product Group A would be helpful as
well. Comments that include rational
argument in support of the position
taken in the comment are likely to be
more useful than comments that merely
assert a position without such support.
Finally, BIS is interested in concrete
information (URL addresses, technical
specifications, etc.) about the
availability of equivalent commodities
from foreign sources.
Dated: November 14, 2008.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–27588 Filed 11–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–894]
Certain Tissue Paper Products From
the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of 2007–2008 Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Gemal Brangman, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70323
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–
3773, respectively.
Background
On April 25, 2008, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published in the Federal Register a
notice of initiation of administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain tissue products from the
People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’),
covering the period March 1, 2007,
through February 29, 2008. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 73 FR 22337 (April 25, 2008). The
preliminary results for this
administrative review are currently due
no later than December 1, 2008.
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’),
requires the Department to issue the
preliminary results of an administrative
review within 245 days after the last day
of the anniversary month of the date of
publication of an order for which a
review is requested. If it is not
practicable to complete the review
within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend this deadline to a
maximum of 365 days.
In this review, the respondents, Max
Fortune Industrial Limited and Max
Fortune (FETDE) Paper Products Co.,
Ltd. (collectively referred to as ‘‘Max
Fortune’’), requested that the
Department revoke the antidumping
duty order on certain tissue paper
products from the PRC with respect to
them pursuant to 19 CFR 351.222(b).
The Department requires additional
time to review and analyze the
revocation request and the factors of
production information submitted by
Max Fortune in this administrative
review and, if necessary, issue an
additional supplemental questionnaire.
The Department also requires additional
time to conduct verification of Max
Fortune’s questionnaire responses.
Thus, it is not practicable to complete
this review within the original time
limit. Therefore, the Department is fully
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results by 120 days
to 365 days, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The preliminary
results are now due no later than March
31, 2009. The final results continue to
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 225 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70322-70323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27588]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 0810231385-81390-01]
Request for Public Comments on the Prospect of Removing 7A
Commodities From De Minimis Eligibility
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is seeking public
comment on the prospect of removing from de minimis eligibility
commodities controlled for missile technology (MT) reasons under
Category 7--Product Group A on the Commerce Control List except when
the 7A commodities are incorporated as standard equipment in Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) (or national equivalent) certified
civilian transport aircraft. If such a policy were implemented, foreign
made items that incorporate U.S.-origin 7A commodities would be subject
to the Export Administration Regulations, except when the 7A
commodities are incorporated as standard equipment in FAA (or national
equivalent) certified civilian transport aircraft. Specifically, BIS is
seeking public input on the impact such a change would have on U.S.
manufacturers of category 7A commodities, as well as the impact such a
change would have on foreign manufacturers that incorporate U.S.-origin
7A commodities into their foreign-made products.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than January 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted via https://
www.regulations.gov, by e-mail directly to BIS at
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov or on paper to U.S. Department of Commerce,
Bureau of Industry and Security, Regulatory Policy Division, Room H-
2705, Washington DC 20230. Please input ``7A/De minimis'' in the
subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharron Cook, Office of Exporter
Services, Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and Security
at 202-482-2440, or fax 202-482-3355, or e-mail at scook@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The term ``de minimis'' generally refers to matters that are of
minor significance. The de minimis provisions of the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) promote U.S. export
[[Page 70323]]
control objectives as set forth in the Export Administration Act of
1979, as amended, (EAA) while limiting U.S. jurisdiction over non-U.S.
products containing a de minimis percentage, by value, of U.S. content.
To prevent the diversion of controlled U.S. items and foreign-made
items incorporating a significant amount of U.S. content, a foreign-
made item that contains more than the de minimis amount of controlled
U.S.-origin content by value is subject to the EAR, i.e., a license may
be required from BIS for the export abroad to another foreign country
or in-country transfer of the foreign-made item. Prior to March 1987,
the EAR set no de minimis levels for U.S. content in foreign-made
items; foreign-made items were subject to the EAR if they contained any
amount of U.S.-origin content, no matter how small. A rule published
March 23, 1987 (52 FR 9147) revised what were then called the ``parts
and components'' provisions to establish thresholds at which the amount
of U.S.-origin commodities in foreign-made items would warrant exercise
of U.S. jurisdiction over the foreign-made item when located outside
the United States. The rule was established to alleviate a major trade
dispute with allies who strenuously objected to U.S. assertion of
jurisdiction over all reexports of non-U.S. items that contained even
small amounts of U.S. content. A major revision of the EAR in 1996 (61
FR 12714) introduced the term ``de minimis'' and established de minimis
thresholds for software and technology. The most recent revisions to
the de minimis rules occurred on October 1, 2008, when BIS published a
rule to change the de minimis calculation for foreign produced hardware
bundled with U.S.-origin software, clarify the definition of
`incorporate' as it is applied to the de minimis rules, and to make
certain other changes.
Commodities controlled by Category 7--Product Group A in the
Commerce Control List are certain equipment and components related to
navigation and avionics. Reviewing agencies have raised concerns that
such commodities, when controlled for MT reasons, have the potential to
provide a foreign product with unique military capabilities, even if
the value of the commodity is below normal de minimis levels. Airline
and national aviation safety controls help to minimize the risk of
diversion for Category 7--Product Group A commodities installed in
civilian aircraft. It is expected the commodities will remain in the
aircraft and free from tampering with such safety controls. However,
when the commodities are exported in less costly end items with no
national aviation safety authority controls, there may be a higher risk
of diversion.
Requests for Comments
BIS is seeking public comments on the expected impact on U.S.
manufacturers of commodities controlled by Category 7--Product Group A,
as well as the expected impact on foreign manufacturers that
incorporate U.S.-origin 7A commodities into their foreign-made
products, if BIS were to remove from de minimis eligibility commodities
controlled for MT reasons under Category 7--Product Group A, except
when the commodities are incorporated as standard equipment in FAA (or
national equivalent) certified civilian transport aircraft. Specific
estimates related to number of exports, revenue, jobs, etc. that would
be affected would be very useful. Also, the impact such a change would
have on decisions to incorporate U.S.-origin items in future foreign
products would also be useful. Examples of commercial foreign products
that incorporate commodities controlled by Category 7--Product Group A
would be helpful as well. Comments that include rational argument in
support of the position taken in the comment are likely to be more
useful than comments that merely assert a position without such
support.
Finally, BIS is interested in concrete information (URL addresses,
technical specifications, etc.) about the availability of equivalent
commodities from foreign sources.
Dated: November 14, 2008.
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-27588 Filed 11-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P