Clarification of the Effective Date Provision in the Final Rule for Ex Parte Appeals, 70282 [E8-27357]
Download as PDF
70282
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 225 / Thursday, November 20, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Part 41
[Docket No.: PTO–P–2008–0054]
Clarification of the Effective Date
Provision in the Final Rule for Ex Parte
Appeals
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Interpretation and effective date
clarification.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On June 10, 2008, the United
States Patent and Trademark Office
(Office) published the final rule that
amends the rules governing practice
before the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences (BPAI) in ex parte patent
appeals. The effective date provision in
the final rule states that the effective
date is December 10, 2008, and the final
rule shall apply to all appeals in which
an appeal brief is filed on or after the
effective date. The final rule requires, in
part, appeal briefs in a new format
relative to the format required prior to
the rule revision. The Office is issuing
this notice to clarify that it will not hold
an appeal brief as non-compliant solely
for following the new format even
though it is filed before the effective
date.
DATES: This is effective November 20,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kery
A. Fries at (571) 272–7757 or Joni Y.
Chang at (571) 272–7720, Senior Legal
Advisors, Office of Patent Legal
Administration, Office of the Deputy
Commissioner for Patent Examination
Policy directly by phone, or by facsimile
to (571) 273–7757, or by mail addressed
to: Mail Stop Comments-Patents,
Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box
1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
10, 2008, the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (Office) published the
final rule that amends the rules
governing practice before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI)
in ex parte patent appeals. See Rules of
Practice Before the Board of Patent
Appeals and Interferences in Ex Parte
Appeals; Final Rule, 73 FR 32938 (June
10, 2008), 1332 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 47
(July 1, 2008) (hereinafter ‘‘BPAI final
rule 2008’’). The BPAI final rule 2008
states that the effective date is December
10, 2008, and the final rule shall apply
to all appeals in which an appeal brief
is filed on or after the effective date. The
BPAI final rule requires, in part, appeal
briefs in a new format relative to the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 Nov 19, 2008
Jkt 217001
format required prior to the rule
revision. The Office has received appeal
briefs in the new format under the final
rule before the effective date. The Office
will not hold an appeal brief as noncompliant solely for following the new
format even though it is filed before the
effective date.
Accordingly, appeal briefs filed before
December 10, 2008, must either comply
with current 37 CFR 41.37 (in effect
before December 10, 2008) or revised 37
CFR 41.37 (in effect on or after
December 10, 2008). Appeal briefs filed
on or after December 10, 2008, must
comply with the revised 37 CFR 41.37.
A certificate of mailing or transmission
in compliance with 37 CFR 1.8 will be
applicable to determine whether the
appeal brief was filed prior to the
effective date in order to determine
which rule applies. For any appeal brief
filed in the new format under revised 37
CFR 41.37, the Office will provide an
examiner’s answer in the new format
under revised 37 CFR 41.39 if the
appeal is maintained.
Similarly, a notice of appeal filed
before December 10, 2008, in
compliance with revised 37 CFR 41.31
(in effect on or after December 10, 2008)
will be accepted by the Office. Thus a
notice of appeal filed before December
10, 2008, must either comply with
current 37 CFR 41.31 (in effect before
December 10, 2008) or revised 37 CFR
41.31 (in effect on or after December 10,
2008), regardless of the date of filing of
the appeal brief. However, a notice of
appeal filed on or after December 10,
2008, must comply with the revised 37
CFR 41.31 (e.g., the notice of appeal
must be signed in accordance with 37
CFR 1.33(b)).
The Office has held a few appeal
briefs filed in the new format prior to
the publication of this clarification
notice non-compliant. Any appellant
who has received a notice of noncompliant appeal brief may request that
the notice of non-compliant appeal brief
be withdrawn if the sole reason for noncompliance is that the appeal brief was
presented in the new format.
Dated: November 10, 2008.
Jon W. Dudas,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. E8–27357 Filed 11–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
PO 00000
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[FCC 08–205; MB Docket No. 04–219; RM–
10986]
Radio Broadcasting Services;
Evergreen, AL and Shalimar, FL
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; denial.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document denies an
Application for Review filed by Qantum
of Fort Walton Beach License Company,
LLC directed to the Memorandum
Opinion and Order in this proceeding.
With this action, the proceeding is
terminated.
DATES: Effective November 20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Hayne, Media Bureau, (202) 418–
2177.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Memorandum Opinion
and Order in MB Docket No. 04–219,
adopted September 5, 2008, and
released October 31, 2008. The full text
of this decision is available for
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete
text of this decision may also be
purchased from the Commission’s copy
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone
1–800–378–3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission
will not send a copy of this
Memorandum Opinion and Order
pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because
the adopted rules are rules of particular
applicability. This document does not
contain new or modified information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any new
or modified ‘‘information collection
burden for small business concerns with
fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to
the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Radio, Radio broadcasting.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–27665 Filed 11–19–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 225 (Thursday, November 20, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27357]
[[Page 70282]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Part 41
[Docket No.: PTO-P-2008-0054]
Clarification of the Effective Date Provision in the Final Rule
for Ex Parte Appeals
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Interpretation and effective date clarification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 10, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark
Office (Office) published the final rule that amends the rules
governing practice before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
(BPAI) in ex parte patent appeals. The effective date provision in the
final rule states that the effective date is December 10, 2008, and the
final rule shall apply to all appeals in which an appeal brief is filed
on or after the effective date. The final rule requires, in part,
appeal briefs in a new format relative to the format required prior to
the rule revision. The Office is issuing this notice to clarify that it
will not hold an appeal brief as non-compliant solely for following the
new format even though it is filed before the effective date.
DATES: This is effective November 20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kery A. Fries at (571) 272-7757 or
Joni Y. Chang at (571) 272-7720, Senior Legal Advisors, Office of
Patent Legal Administration, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for
Patent Examination Policy directly by phone, or by facsimile to (571)
273-7757, or by mail addressed to: Mail Stop Comments-Patents,
Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 10, 2008, the United States Patent
and Trademark Office (Office) published the final rule that amends the
rules governing practice before the Board of Patent Appeals and
Interferences (BPAI) in ex parte patent appeals. See Rules of Practice
Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex Parte
Appeals; Final Rule, 73 FR 32938 (June 10, 2008), 1332 Off. Gaz. Pat.
Office 47 (July 1, 2008) (hereinafter ``BPAI final rule 2008''). The
BPAI final rule 2008 states that the effective date is December 10,
2008, and the final rule shall apply to all appeals in which an appeal
brief is filed on or after the effective date. The BPAI final rule
requires, in part, appeal briefs in a new format relative to the format
required prior to the rule revision. The Office has received appeal
briefs in the new format under the final rule before the effective
date. The Office will not hold an appeal brief as non-compliant solely
for following the new format even though it is filed before the
effective date.
Accordingly, appeal briefs filed before December 10, 2008, must
either comply with current 37 CFR 41.37 (in effect before December 10,
2008) or revised 37 CFR 41.37 (in effect on or after December 10,
2008). Appeal briefs filed on or after December 10, 2008, must comply
with the revised 37 CFR 41.37. A certificate of mailing or transmission
in compliance with 37 CFR 1.8 will be applicable to determine whether
the appeal brief was filed prior to the effective date in order to
determine which rule applies. For any appeal brief filed in the new
format under revised 37 CFR 41.37, the Office will provide an
examiner's answer in the new format under revised 37 CFR 41.39 if the
appeal is maintained.
Similarly, a notice of appeal filed before December 10, 2008, in
compliance with revised 37 CFR 41.31 (in effect on or after December
10, 2008) will be accepted by the Office. Thus a notice of appeal filed
before December 10, 2008, must either comply with current 37 CFR 41.31
(in effect before December 10, 2008) or revised 37 CFR 41.31 (in effect
on or after December 10, 2008), regardless of the date of filing of the
appeal brief. However, a notice of appeal filed on or after December
10, 2008, must comply with the revised 37 CFR 41.31 (e.g., the notice
of appeal must be signed in accordance with 37 CFR 1.33(b)).
The Office has held a few appeal briefs filed in the new format
prior to the publication of this clarification notice non-compliant.
Any appellant who has received a notice of non-compliant appeal brief
may request that the notice of non-compliant appeal brief be withdrawn
if the sole reason for non-compliance is that the appeal brief was
presented in the new format.
Dated: November 10, 2008.
Jon W. Dudas,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. E8-27357 Filed 11-19-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P