APEC 2011 Leaders' Meeting, 69715-69716 [E8-27490]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 19, 2008 / Notices
enforcement concerns. Interaero will
remain under a policy of denial
concerning license applications and
other approvals, and will therefore
continue to be ineligible to engage in
export activities under the AECA.
Therefore, in accordance with section
38(g)(4) of the AECA, the debarment of
Interaero, Inc. is rescinded, effective
November 19, 2008.
Dated: October 3, 2008.
Frank J. Ruggiero,
Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–27502 Filed 11–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Dated: October 3, 2008.
Frank J. Ruggiero,
Assistant Secretary of State for PoliticalMilitary Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–27500 Filed 11–18–08; 8:45 am]
[Public Notice 6429]
Termination of Statutory Debarment
Pursuant to Section 38(g)(4) of the
Arms Export Control Act for Quality
Aviation, Inc.
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
Notice.
Notice is hereby given that
the Department of State has terminated
the statutory debarment of Quality
Aviation, Inc. pursuant to section
38(g)(4) of the Arms Export Control Act
(AECA) (22 U.S.C. 2778).
DATES: Effective November 19, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David C. Trimble, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Compliance,
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls,
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs,
Department of State (202) 663–2807.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
38(g)(4) of the AECA and section 127.11
of the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) prohibit the
issuance of export licenses or other
approvals to a person if that person, or
any party to the export, has been
convicted of violating the AECA and
certain other U.S. criminal statutes
enumerated at section 38(g)(1) of the
AECA and section 120.27 of the ITAR.
A person convicted of violating the
AECA is also subject to statutory
debarment under section 127.7 of the
ITAR.
In August 2001, Quality Aviation, Inc.
was convicted of violating the AECA
(U.S. District Court, Central District of
California, Western Division—Los
Angeles, 2:00–cr–00787–WDK–1). Based
on this conviction, Quality Aviation,
Inc. was statutorily debarred pursuant to
section 38(g)(4) of the AECA and section
127.7 of the ITAR and, thus, prohibited
from participating directly or indirectly
in exports of defense articles and
defense services. Notice of debarment
SUMMARY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
was published in the Federal Register
(68 FR 52436, September 3, 2003).
Section 38(g)(4) of the AECA permits
termination of debarment after
consultation with the other appropriate
U.S. agencies and after a thorough
review of the circumstances
surrounding the conviction and a
finding that appropriate steps have been
taken to mitigate any law enforcement
concerns. The Department of State has
determined that Quality Aviation, Inc.
has taken appropriate steps to address
the causes of the violations and to
mitigate any law enforcement concerns.
Therefore, in accordance with section
38(g)(4) of the AECA, the debarment of
Quality Aviation, Inc. is rescinded,
effective November 19, 2008.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Nov 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6428]
APEC 2011 Leaders’ Meeting
Summary: United States cities and
major resort/hotel destinations are
invited to present proposals to hold the
concluding series of meetings of the
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation
(APEC) forum scheduled for November
12–20, 2011. Over the course of nine
days, the United States Government will
organize various official and informal
events, bilateral meetings, and media
events that APEC member economies
will attend. In total, up to 20,000
participants, including support staff,
security, media, and businesspersons
are expected to attend. Global media
attention will focus on the APEC
Leaders’ Meetings and the city selected
to host the event. The President of the
United States, 18 other Heads of
Government and representatives from
Hong Kong and Taiwan are expected to
attend. Each APEC delegation will likely
come with its own advisors, security,
and media. The APEC CEO Summit will
also attract senior business executives
from around the Asia-Pacific region.
With this many high-profile visitors,
security will be a major consideration
for the selection of the city and
conference venues. The following
meetings are expected to be held from
November 12–20, 2011: (1) Concluding
Senior Officials Meeting (CSOM)—2
days, approximately 200 delegates; (2)
APEC Business Advisory Council
Meeting (ABAC)—4 days,
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69715
approximately 200 delegates; (3) APEC
Ministerial Meeting (AMM)—2 days,
approximately 500 delegates; (4) APEC
CEO Summit—2 days, approximately
10,000 participants; (5) ABAC Dialogue
with Leaders—1⁄2 day, restricted
attendance; (6) APEC Economic Leaders
Meeting (AELM)—2 days, restricted
attendance, 10,000 participants. The
minimum requirements are as follows:
An international airport with good
connections to and from APEC
economies (further information on
APEC can be found at www.APEC.org);
20,000 hotel rooms of international
standard including 80 suites for Heads
of Government and cabinet-level
Ministers; Conference facilities for
multiple meetings; Political, business,
and civic support; Local security
capable of supporting delegates and
VIPs. Preparation of Proposals. Deadline
is December 15, 2008. The city selection
will be made by the new
Administration. Proposals must be in
one (1) three-inch binder with no loose
inserts. A professional video
presentation of the city or resort/hotel
must be included on a DVD. Three
copies of the proposals must be mailed
to: U.S. Department of State, Attn: APEC
2011 Leaders’ Meeting, 2201 C. Street,
Washington, DC 20520. Proposals
should be postmarked by December 15,
2008. Questions about the proposal can
be directed to APEC2011@state.gov.
Questions will be responded to in a
timely manner. All information in the
proposal, including prices, must be
valid for 60 days after the due date.
Binders must have the following
sections: (1) One-page executive
summary of what the city offers. (2)
General city description including the
following: (a) Letter of support from the
mayor or city’s senior elected official;
(b) letter of support from the state
governor; (c) letter of support from local
chamber of commerce; (d) a past
performance statement which indicates
the city’s experience in putting on large
meetings and events of this scale; (e)
history of the city; (f) manufacturing and
trade with the Asian-Pacific region; (g)
description of the city’s population
groups from the APEC economies; (h)
cultural attractions and shopping; and
(i) availability of special places of
interest that could be used for formal
receptions, official dinners, or other
events (e.g. museums, parks,
monuments, theatres, etc.). (3) Airport:
(a) Airline connections with APEC
economies; (b) immigration and customs
facilities; facilitated and expedited
immigration for delegates, if any; (c)
ability to receive private airplanes of
heads of government and VIPs; (d)
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
69716
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 19, 2008 / Notices
ground transportation to conference
hotels; (e) arrival welcome for delegates,
if any; and (f) traveler assistance
services. (4) Hotel rooms and prices: (a)
Hotels within one mile of the
conference center including facilities,
such as wireless internet (WIFI), and
restaurants; (b) Hotels farther than one
mile from the conference center
including facilities, such as WIFI and
restaurants; (c) hotel rooms suitable for
VIPs; (d) up-to-date safety/security
systems; and (e) ability to comply with
security checks on employees. (5)
Conference facilities: (a) Catering,
audio-visual, perimeter security, on-site
maintenance, management, medical,
and WIFI; (b) dedicated entrance for
APEC delegates, if any; (c) meeting
rooms; (d) transportation between hotels
and conference facilities; (e) spreadsheet
with costs of conference facilities for
dates indicated; (f) Statement that the
facilities are available for conference
dates plus four weeks before those dates
and one week after; and (g) Lunch
facilities within a 15-minute walk of the
conference facilities. (6) Letters of
support from civic and business groups.
(7) Letter of support from conference
bureau. (8) Description of local
transportation. (9) Security should
address the AELM Leaders’ conference
facilities and hotels only. Please address
the following questions: How will the
city provide security for the delegates
and VIPs including the U.S. President?
Only the U.S. President and other Heads
of Government will have United States
Secret Service (USSS) protective details.
Each Head of Government will receive
protection and a limousine. The
Secretary of State has 24/7 Diplomatic
Security Service (DS) protection. Heads
of delegations that are not Heads of
Government would NOT receive USSS
protection but, based on threat, might
receive DS protection. Local Police
Departments (PD) normally provide
route, motorcade, and intelligence
support to the USSS. Local PDs
historically have the lead responsibility
for providing crowd control,
demonstration control and riot
response. If required, will the city block
off streets around the conference venue
and hotels for Heads of Government?
The conference facility would have tight
perimeter and access controls. Security
arrangements for hotels are based on
threat information relating to the Heads
of Government and will be determined
on a case-by-case basis by the USSS and
Local PD. Not every hotel would
necessarily have total perimeter
controls. Conversely, a central hotel
might meet criteria for closed streets
and public access. How will the city
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:14 Nov 18, 2008
Jkt 217001
fund the extra security required for this
conference? Cities that bid on such
events must take into account and
budget for the extensive costs of
Security and Public Safety, as that
responsibility lies solely with the host
city. The USSS and DS do not reimburse
local police for costs of supporting
visiting foreign dignitaries. Some cities
in the past have been able to obtain
funding to offset security costs through
Congress when requests for funding
support have been initiated by their
congressional representatives. This
event would likely receive a Department
of Homeland Security, Special Event
Activity Report (SEAR) Level One. It
could possibly receive designation as a
National Security Special Event (NSSE)
but that would not likely be determined
until approximately one year or less
prior to the event. The SEAR and NSSE
designations are made based on certain
criteria by either the DHS Special Event
Working Group or the NSSE Working
Group (Interagency Security groups that
use methodology to determine an
event’s rating.) Neither designation
provides funding to local public safety
agencies, but the ultimate SEAR level
and, if applicable, NSSE designation,
does outline the level of support that
Federal agencies can provide. What
public safety infrastructure is available?
Address the following: (1) Police: (a)
Special operations capabilities; (b) VIP
protection; (c) riot and crowd control
response to incidents; (d) explosive
detection and disposal; (e) traffic
controls; (f) Intelligence Division; (g)
mutual aid agreements/memorandum of
understanding with surrounding
jurisdictions/state police; (h)
communication center and procedures;
and (i) current emergency plan. (2) Fire/
emergency medical service: (a) Chemical
Biological Radiological and Nuclear
detection/procedures; (b) first
responders; (c) equipment/training and
trained staff on hand. (3) Emergency
Management: (a) Mass casualty; (b)
terrorist attack; and (c) natural disaster.
(4) Emergency Facilities: (a) Hospital/
Medical Centers; (b) emergency backup
communications; (c) emergency
supplies; and (d) evacuation plans.
Dated: November 7, 2008.
Edward Malcik,
Director, Office of International Conferences,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–27490 Filed 11–18–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–19–P
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Notice of Applications for Certificates
of Public Convenience and Necessity
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed
Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q)
During the Week Ending October 24,
2008
The following Applications for
Certificates of Public Convenience and
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier
Permits were filed under Subpart B
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department
of Transportation’s Procedural
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et
seq.). The due date for Answers,
Conforming Applications, or Motions to
Modify Scope are set forth below for
each application. Following the Answer
period DOT may process the application
by expedited procedures. Such
procedures may consist of the adoption
of a show-cause order, a tentative order,
or in appropriate cases a final order
without further proceedings.
Docket Number: DOT–OST–2004–
18639.
Date Filed: October 20, 2008.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: November 10, 2008.
Description: Supplement of TNT
Airways S.A. to its application for a
foreign air carrier permit to include
authorization to engage in: (i) Scheduled
and charter foreign air transportation of
property and mail from any point or
points behind any Member State of the
European Union via any point or points
in any Member State and via
intermediate points to any point or
points in the United States and beyond;
(2) scheduled and charter foreign air
transportation of property and mail
between any point or points in the
United States and any point or points in
any member of the European Common
Aviation Area; (3) scheduled and
charter foreign cargo air transportation
between any point or points in the
United States and any point or points;
(4) other charters; and (5) transportation
authorized by any additional route
rights made available to European
Community carriers in the future.
Docket Number: DOT–OST–2008–
0311.
Date Filed: October 24, 2008.
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
Applications, or Motion to Modify
Scope: November 14, 2008.
Description: Application of ExecuJet
Europe GmbH (‘‘ExecuJet’’) requesting
exemption and permit authority
permitting ExecuJet to conduct charter
foreign air transportation of persons and
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69715-69716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27490]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6428]
APEC 2011 Leaders' Meeting
Summary: United States cities and major resort/hotel destinations
are invited to present proposals to hold the concluding series of
meetings of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum
scheduled for November 12-20, 2011. Over the course of nine days, the
United States Government will organize various official and informal
events, bilateral meetings, and media events that APEC member economies
will attend. In total, up to 20,000 participants, including support
staff, security, media, and businesspersons are expected to attend.
Global media attention will focus on the APEC Leaders' Meetings and the
city selected to host the event. The President of the United States, 18
other Heads of Government and representatives from Hong Kong and Taiwan
are expected to attend. Each APEC delegation will likely come with its
own advisors, security, and media. The APEC CEO Summit will also
attract senior business executives from around the Asia-Pacific region.
With this many high-profile visitors, security will be a major
consideration for the selection of the city and conference venues. The
following meetings are expected to be held from November 12-20, 2011:
(1) Concluding Senior Officials Meeting (CSOM)--2 days, approximately
200 delegates; (2) APEC Business Advisory Council Meeting (ABAC)--4
days, approximately 200 delegates; (3) APEC Ministerial Meeting (AMM)--
2 days, approximately 500 delegates; (4) APEC CEO Summit--2 days,
approximately 10,000 participants; (5) ABAC Dialogue with Leaders--\1/
2\ day, restricted attendance; (6) APEC Economic Leaders Meeting
(AELM)--2 days, restricted attendance, 10,000 participants. The minimum
requirements are as follows: An international airport with good
connections to and from APEC economies (further information on APEC can
be found at www.APEC.org); 20,000 hotel rooms of international standard
including 80 suites for Heads of Government and cabinet-level
Ministers; Conference facilities for multiple meetings; Political,
business, and civic support; Local security capable of supporting
delegates and VIPs. Preparation of Proposals. Deadline is December 15,
2008. The city selection will be made by the new Administration.
Proposals must be in one (1) three-inch binder with no loose inserts. A
professional video presentation of the city or resort/hotel must be
included on a DVD. Three copies of the proposals must be mailed to:
U.S. Department of State, Attn: APEC 2011 Leaders' Meeting, 2201 C.
Street, Washington, DC 20520. Proposals should be postmarked by
December 15, 2008. Questions about the proposal can be directed to
APEC2011@state.gov. Questions will be responded to in a timely manner.
All information in the proposal, including prices, must be valid for 60
days after the due date. Binders must have the following sections: (1)
One-page executive summary of what the city offers. (2) General city
description including the following: (a) Letter of support from the
mayor or city's senior elected official; (b) letter of support from the
state governor; (c) letter of support from local chamber of commerce;
(d) a past performance statement which indicates the city's experience
in putting on large meetings and events of this scale; (e) history of
the city; (f) manufacturing and trade with the Asian-Pacific region;
(g) description of the city's population groups from the APEC
economies; (h) cultural attractions and shopping; and (i) availability
of special places of interest that could be used for formal receptions,
official dinners, or other events (e.g. museums, parks, monuments,
theatres, etc.). (3) Airport: (a) Airline connections with APEC
economies; (b) immigration and customs facilities; facilitated and
expedited immigration for delegates, if any; (c) ability to receive
private airplanes of heads of government and VIPs; (d)
[[Page 69716]]
ground transportation to conference hotels; (e) arrival welcome for
delegates, if any; and (f) traveler assistance services. (4) Hotel
rooms and prices: (a) Hotels within one mile of the conference center
including facilities, such as wireless internet (WIFI), and
restaurants; (b) Hotels farther than one mile from the conference
center including facilities, such as WIFI and restaurants; (c) hotel
rooms suitable for VIPs; (d) up-to-date safety/security systems; and
(e) ability to comply with security checks on employees. (5) Conference
facilities: (a) Catering, audio-visual, perimeter security, on-site
maintenance, management, medical, and WIFI; (b) dedicated entrance for
APEC delegates, if any; (c) meeting rooms; (d) transportation between
hotels and conference facilities; (e) spreadsheet with costs of
conference facilities for dates indicated; (f) Statement that the
facilities are available for conference dates plus four weeks before
those dates and one week after; and (g) Lunch facilities within a 15-
minute walk of the conference facilities. (6) Letters of support from
civic and business groups. (7) Letter of support from conference
bureau. (8) Description of local transportation. (9) Security should
address the AELM Leaders' conference facilities and hotels only. Please
address the following questions: How will the city provide security for
the delegates and VIPs including the U.S. President? Only the U.S.
President and other Heads of Government will have United States Secret
Service (USSS) protective details. Each Head of Government will receive
protection and a limousine. The Secretary of State has 24/7 Diplomatic
Security Service (DS) protection. Heads of delegations that are not
Heads of Government would NOT receive USSS protection but, based on
threat, might receive DS protection. Local Police Departments (PD)
normally provide route, motorcade, and intelligence support to the
USSS. Local PDs historically have the lead responsibility for providing
crowd control, demonstration control and riot response. If required,
will the city block off streets around the conference venue and hotels
for Heads of Government? The conference facility would have tight
perimeter and access controls. Security arrangements for hotels are
based on threat information relating to the Heads of Government and
will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the USSS and Local PD.
Not every hotel would necessarily have total perimeter controls.
Conversely, a central hotel might meet criteria for closed streets and
public access. How will the city fund the extra security required for
this conference? Cities that bid on such events must take into account
and budget for the extensive costs of Security and Public Safety, as
that responsibility lies solely with the host city. The USSS and DS do
not reimburse local police for costs of supporting visiting foreign
dignitaries. Some cities in the past have been able to obtain funding
to offset security costs through Congress when requests for funding
support have been initiated by their congressional representatives.
This event would likely receive a Department of Homeland Security,
Special Event Activity Report (SEAR) Level One. It could possibly
receive designation as a National Security Special Event (NSSE) but
that would not likely be determined until approximately one year or
less prior to the event. The SEAR and NSSE designations are made based
on certain criteria by either the DHS Special Event Working Group or
the NSSE Working Group (Interagency Security groups that use
methodology to determine an event's rating.) Neither designation
provides funding to local public safety agencies, but the ultimate SEAR
level and, if applicable, NSSE designation, does outline the level of
support that Federal agencies can provide. What public safety
infrastructure is available? Address the following: (1) Police: (a)
Special operations capabilities; (b) VIP protection; (c) riot and crowd
control response to incidents; (d) explosive detection and disposal;
(e) traffic controls; (f) Intelligence Division; (g) mutual aid
agreements/memorandum of understanding with surrounding jurisdictions/
state police; (h) communication center and procedures; and (i) current
emergency plan. (2) Fire/emergency medical service: (a) Chemical
Biological Radiological and Nuclear detection/procedures; (b) first
responders; (c) equipment/training and trained staff on hand. (3)
Emergency Management: (a) Mass casualty; (b) terrorist attack; and (c)
natural disaster. (4) Emergency Facilities: (a) Hospital/Medical
Centers; (b) emergency backup communications; (c) emergency supplies;
and (d) evacuation plans.
Dated: November 7, 2008.
Edward Malcik,
Director, Office of International Conferences, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-27490 Filed 11-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P