New Mexico Regulatory Program, 68339-68345 [E8-27360]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(B) Will not be disclosed to other
affected parties.
(iii) If, before the 15th business day
(as defined in § 4000.22 of this chapter)
after PBGC has received a request under
paragraph (a), PBGC receives a court
order as described in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
of this section, PBGC will disclose those
portions of the administrative record
that contain confidential information
described in section 552(b) of title 5,
United States Code, only as provided in
the order.
(3) Timing of response. PBGC will
send the administrative record to the
affected party that made the request not
later than the 15th business day (as
defined in § 4000.22 of this chapter)
after it receives the request.
(4) Form and manner. PBGC will
provide the administrative record using
measures (including electronic
measures) reasonably calculated to
ensure actual receipt of the material by
the intended recipient.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 13 day of
November, 2008.
Charles E.F. Millard,
Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
Issued on the date set forth above pursuant
to a resolution of the Board of Directors
authorizing publication of this final rule.
Judith R. Starr,
Secretary, Board of Directors, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E8–27350 Filed 11–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 931
[SATS Number NM–047–FOR]
New Mexico Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are approving an
amendment to the New Mexico
regulatory program (the ‘‘New Mexico
program’’) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). New Mexico is
proposing additions to and revisions of
the New Mexico Administrative Code
(NMAC) to improve and clarify the
public notification process during
permitting actions, to correct outdated
citations, and to comply with formatting
requirements for New Mexico
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:43 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
68339
administrative law. The revisions also
include non-substantive editorial
changes. New Mexico revised its
program to provide additional
safeguards, clarify ambiguities, and
achieve stylistic consistency.
DATES: Effective Date: November 18,
2008.
opportunity for a public hearing or
meeting on the amendment’s adequacy
(Administrative Record No. OSM–2007–
0021–0002). We did not hold a public
hearing or meeting because no one
requested one. The public comment
period ended on February 11, 2008. We
did not receive any comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bob
Postle, Branch Chief, Field Operations,
Program Support Division; Telephone:
(505) 248–5070; Internet address:
bpostle@osmre.gov.
III. OSM’s Findings
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Following are the findings we made
concerning the amendment under
SMCRA and the Federal regulations at
30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. We are
approving the amendment.
I. Background on the New Mexico Program
II. Submission of the Proposed Amendment
III. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement’s (OSM’s) Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSM’s Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the New Mexico
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its State program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (a)(7). On the basis of
these criteria, the Secretary of the
Interior conditionally approved the New
Mexico program on December 31, 1980.
You can find background information
on the New Mexico program, including
the Secretary’s findings, the disposition
of comments, and conditions of
approval in the December 31, 1980,
Federal Register (45 FR 86459). You can
also find later actions concerning New
Mexico’s program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 931.10, 931.11,
931.13, 931.15, 931.16, and 931.30.
II. Submission of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated November 28, 2007,
New Mexico sent us an amendment to
its program (SATS number NM–047–
FOR; Administrative Record No. OSM–
2007–0021–0002) under SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). New Mexico sent
the amendment to include changes
made at its own initiative.
We announced receipt of the
proposed amendment in the January 11,
2008, Federal Register (73 FR 1983). In
the same document, we opened the
public comment period and provided an
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Minor Revisions to New Mexico’s
Rules
New Mexico proposed minor
wording, editorial, punctuation,
grammatical, citation, stylistic, and
recodification changes to the following
previously approved rules at NMAC:
• 19.8.1.7.B(1); G(1); N, and R(3)—
Definitions
• 19.8.2.201.B.(2)(a)—Areas Where
Mining Is Prohibited or Limited
• 19.8.2.202.F—Procedures/Review by
Other Agencies
• 19.8.4.401.A and B—Procedures:
Initial.
Processing, Record-Keeping, and
Notification Requirements
• 19.8.4.402.B—Procedures: Hearing
Requirements
• 19.8.5.504.B—Permit Application
Filing Deadlines
• 19.8.6.601.F—General Requirements:
Exploration of Less Than 250 Tons
• 19.8.6.603.B(2)—Applications:
Approval or Disapproval of
Exploration of More Than 250 Tons
• 19.8.6.606.B—Public Availability of
Information
• 19.8.7.705.A—Permit Term
Information
• 19.8.7.708—Identification of Location
of Public Office for Filing of
Application
• 19.8.8.801.B—General Environmental
Resources Information
• 19.8.8.803.B—Geology Description
• 19.8.8.814.A, B(5), D, and D(2)—
Prime Farmland Investigation
• 19.8.9.901.B(1) and B(3)—Operation
Plan: Existing Structures
• 19.8.9.903.B(3)—Operation Plan:
Maps and Plans
• 19.8.9.906.B(2)—Reclamation Plan:
General Requirements
• 19.8.9.907.B(1)—Reclamation Plan:
Protection of Hydrologic Balance
• 19.8.9.909.A(2)—Reclamation Plan:
Ponds, Impoundments, Banks, Dams,
and Embankments
• 19.8.9.913—Relocation or Use of
Public Roads
• 19.8.9.916—Transportation Facilities
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
68340
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
• 19.8.9.917—Return of Coal Processing
Waste to Abandoned Underground
Workings
• 19.8.10.1000.A(4)(a) and A(4)(b)—
Experimental Practices in Mining
• 19.8.10.1000.E—Experimental
Practices in Mining
• 19.8.10.1001.A, B(1)(b), and (C)—
Mountaintop Removal Mining
• 19.8.10.1002.B and C—Steep Slope
Mining
• 19.8.10.1003.A(3) and A(4)(c)—
Permits Incorporating Variances From
Approximate Original Contour
Restoration Requirements for Steep
Slope Mining
• 19.8.10.1004.A(1), A(4), and B—Prime
Farmlands
• 19.8.10.1005.B(8)—Variances for
Delay in Contemporaneous
Reclamation Required in Combined
Surface and Underground Mining
Operations
• 19.8.10.1006.C—Surface Coal Mining
and Reclamation Operation on Areas
or Adjacent to Areas Including
Alluvial Valley Floors
• 19.8.11.1100.A(3)—Public Notices of
Filing of Permit Applications
• 19.8.11.1101.A and C—Opportunity
for Submission of Written Comments
on Permit Applications
• 19.8.11.1102.B(2)—Right to File
Written Objections
• 19.8.11.1103.B(4)—Hearings and
Conferences
• 19.8.11.1105.B—Review of Permit
Applications
• 19.8.11.1106.K—Criteria for Approval
or Denial
• 19.8.11.1108.C—Criteria for Permit
Approval or Denial: Existing
Structures
• 19.8.11.1109.F—Permit Approval or
Denial Actions
• 19.8.11.1111.B(4)—Permit Terms
• 19.8.11.1112.C—Conditions of
Permits: General and Right of Entry
• 19.8.13.1301.G—Permit Revisions
• 19.8.13.1303.A(3) and B(2)—Permit
Renewals: Complete Applications
• 19.8.13.1305.A(4)—Permit Renewals:
Approval or Denial
• 19.8.13.1307.A(2)(d), B, and C(2)—
Transfer, Assignment or Sale of
Permit Rights: Obtaining Approval
• 19.8.14.1401.B and D—Requirement
to File a Bond
• 19.8.14.1403.A, C, D, D(1), and D(2)—
Period of Liability
• 19.8.14.1406.C, D, E, and E(2)—
General Terms and Conditions of
Bond
• 19.8.14.1407.A, B(1), and B(4)—Bond
Requirements for Underground Coal
Mines and Long-Term Coal-Related
Surface Facilities and Structures
• 19.8.14.1409.A(1), B(3), D(1), and E—
Collateral Bonds
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:43 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
• 19.8.14.1410.D(4)—Self-Bonding
• 19.8.14.1411.B—Replacement of
Bonds
• 19.8.14.1412.A(3), B(2), C(2), and D—
Requirement to Release Performance
Bonds
• 19.8.14.1413.A(2)(b), C, and D—
Forfeiture Bonds
• 19.8.14.1414.B and D—Terms and
Conditions for Liability Insurance
• 19.8.19.1902.C and C(3)(c)—
Performance Standards for Coal
Exploration
• 19.8.20.2010.A—Hydrologic Balance:
Water Quality Standards and Effluent
Limitations
• 19.8.20.2017.E(1), E(2), E(4), and
E(6)—Hydrologic Balance: Permanent
and Temporary Impoundments
• 19.8.20.2019—Hydrologic Balance:
Protection of Ground Water Recharge
Capacity
• 19.8.20.2026.B, B(1), and B(2)—
Hydrologic Balance: Underground
Mine Entry and Access Discharges
• 19.8.20.2037.B—Disposal of Excess
Spoil: Durable Rock Fills
• 19.8.20.2047—Coal Processing Waste:
Dams and Embankments: General
Requirements
• 19.8.20.2049.A(1)—Coal Processing
Waste: Dams and Embankments:
Design and Construction
• 19.8.20.2050—Air Resources
Protection
• 19.8.20.2056—Backfilling and
Grading: Covering Coal And Acidand Toxic-forming Material
• 19.8.20.2065 and 2065.B—
Revegetation: Standards for Success
• 19.8.20.2066—Revegetation: Tree and
Shrub Stocking
• 19.8.24.2404.C(4)(a) and (b), C(5), and
C(6)—Prime Farmland: Revegetation
• 19.8.26.2601.A, A(2), and D—Steep
Slopes: Performance Standards
• 19.8.27.2701.B—Coal Processing
Plants: Performance Standards
• 19.8.29.2900.B and H—Inspections
• 19.8.30.3001.J—Notices of Violation
• 19.8.30.3002.D—Permit Suspension
or Revocation
• 19.8.31.3105.B—Procedure for Civil
Penalty Assessment
• 19.8.31.3106.B and D—Procedure for
Assessment Conference
• 19.8.31.3110.A—Amount of
Individual Civil Penalty
• 19.8.34.3400—Scope
• 19.8.34.3401—Definition
• 19.8.34.3402 and 3402.A—
Application Requirements and
Procedures
• 19.8.34.3403—Contents of
Applications for Exemption
• 19.8.34.3404—Public Availability of
Information
• 19.8.34.3405—Requirements for
Exemptions
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• 19.8.34.3406—Conditions of
Exemption and Right of Inspection
and Entry
• 19.8.34.3407—Stockpiling of Minerals
• 19.8.34.3408 and 3408.C—Revocation
and Enforcement
• 19.8.34.3409, 3409.A and A(2)—
Reporting Requirements
• 19.8.35.12.C—How a Decision on a
VER Request Will be Made
• 19.8.35.14—Availability of Records
for VER Requests and Determinations
Because these changes are minor and
nonsubstantive in nature, we find that
they will not make New Mexico’s
previously approved rules less effective
than the corresponding Federal
regulations.
B. Revisions to New Mexico’s Rules That
Have the Same Meaning as the
Corresponding Provisions of the Federal
Regulations
New Mexico proposed revisions to the
following rules containing language that
is the same as or is similar to the
corresponding sections of the Federal
regulations (NMAC citation followed by
Federal counterpart citation and NMAC
section title):
• 19.8.1.7.G(1), 30 CFR 707.5,
Definitions
• 19.8.13.1301.E(2)(b), 30 CFR
775.11(a), Permit Revisions
• 19.8.20.2065.A, 30 CFR 817.116(a)(1),
Revegetation: Standards for Success
• 19.8.20.2065.B(1), 30 CFR
817.116(a)(2), Revegetation: Standards
for Success
• 19.8.20.2068, 30 CFR 817.122,
Subsidence Control: Public Notice
• 19.8.30.3000, 30 CFR 843.11(c),
Cessation Orders
• 19.8.31.3108.B, 30 CFR 845.20(b),
Final Assessment and Payment of
Penalty
• 19.8.31.3110.B, 30 CFR 846.14(b),
Amount of Individual Civil Penalty
Because these proposed rules contain
language that is the same as or similar
to the corresponding Federal
regulations, we find that they are no less
effective than the corresponding Federal
regulations.
C. Revisions to New Mexico’s Rules That
Are Not the Same as the Corresponding
Provisions of the Federal Regulations
1. NMAC 19.8.5.504.D, 30 CFR 773.6(c),
Permit Application Filing Deadlines
New Mexico proposed to eliminate
NMAC 19.8.5.504.D concerning
applications for a permit to conduct
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations that do not meet the
requirements of NMAC 19.8.5.501 and
19.8.5.502. NMAC 19.8.5.501 and
19.8.5.502 concern continuing interim
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
program permits and Federal permits,
respectively. There are no longer any
such interim or Federal permits that
need to be continued in New Mexico, so
citing them in this section is moot.
New Mexico also omitted the last
sentence of 19.8.5.504.D, which makes
reference to the rules and regulations of
NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E, since 1103.E is
proposed to be deleted with this
amendment package. We approve these
changes to New Mexico Administrative
Code.
2. NMAC 19.8.7.701.F, Identification of
Interests
New Mexico’s existing rules require
the applicant to submit the name and
address of each owner of record of all
property (surface and subsurface)
contiguous to any part of the proposed
permit area. New Mexico proposed to
modify its existing rules by adding
language that requires the permit
application to also include ‘‘the owner
of record and residents of all dwellings
and structures on and within one-half
mile (2640 feet) of any part of the
proposed permit area’’. This provision
adds specificity and is no less effective
than the Federal counterpart at 30 CFR
778.13(b), which requires ‘‘the name
and address of each owner of record of
all property (surface and subsurface)
contiguous to any part of the proposed
permit area’’. Therefore, we find that
NMAC 19.8.7.701.F is no less effective
than 30 CFR 778.13(b) and approve it.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
3. NMAC 19.8.8.812.D, Maps: General
Requirements
New Mexico proposed to modify its
existing rules by adding language at
NMAC 19.8.8.812.D, which coincides
with the above listed proposed change
to NMAC 19.8.7.701.F. The proposed
revision to 812.D ensures that dwellings
and structures, and names of present
owners of record and residents of those
dwellings and structures, on and within
one-half mile (2640 feet) of the proposed
permit area are included on the permit
application maps. New Mexico’s
proposed rule includes a larger area and
therefore protects more dwellings and
structures than the Federal counterpart
at 30 CFR 779.24(d) which requires that
only the location of all buildings on and
within 1000 feet of the proposed permit
area are included on the permit
application maps. For this reason, we
find that NMAC 19.8.812.D is no less
effective than 30 CFR 778.13(b) and
approve this proposed change.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:43 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
4. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.B(1) Through (4),
Public Notices of Filing of Permit
Applications
New Mexico added language to
NMAC 19.8.11.1100 which expands
upon the Federal counterpart rules at 30
CFR 773.6(a) concerning public
participation and public notification in
the permitting processing. New Mexico
proposed to modify its rules to expand
the options for notification of permit
applications. The added language
requires the permit applicant to: ‘‘* * *
Submit, at the time of filing the
application, a plan approved by the
director [of the New Mexico program] to
provide notice using at least three of the
methods listed below. If the director
determines that significant non-English
speaking populations live within the
general area of the proposed mine, the
applicant shall include at least one
method that seeks to reach these
populations. The notice shall
summarize the information listed in,
and shall be given prior to the last
publication of the notice in, Subsection
A of 19.8.11.1100 NMAC. The methods
may include:
(1) Mailing a notice to the owners of
record, as shown by the most recent
property tax schedule, of all properties
adjacent to the proposed permit area
and to the owners of all properties
containing a residence located within
one-half mile (2640 feet) of the proposed
permit area as identified in Subsection
F of 19.8.7.701 NMAC;
(2) Posting a notice in at least four
publicly accessible and conspicuous
places, including the entrance to the
proposed operation if that entrance is
publicly accessible and conspicuous;
(3) Publishing a notice in a display ad
at least three inches by four inches at a
place in the newspaper calculated to
give the general public the most
effective notice; or
(4) Broadcasting public service
announcements on radio stations that
serve the general permit area’’.
OSM supports any additional
outreach to the public during the
notification process. Because New
Mexico’s additions to NMAC result in
more public notification than 30 CFR
773.6 requires, they are no less effective
than the Federal regulations relating to
public notification of permit
applications. We approve these changes.
5. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.D(5), Public
Notices of Filing of Permit Applications
New Mexico proposed to modify its
existing rules to require that, in addition
to Federal, State, Tribal, and local
government agencies, governmental
planning agencies, sewage and water
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68341
treatment authorities, and water
companies, written notifications shall
also be sent to ‘‘all persons on a list,
maintained by the director, of
individuals and organizations who have
requested notice of applications under
the act and who have provided a surface
or electronic mail address to the
director’’. This means that in addition to
the above listed agencies, non-agency
interested parties or individuals have
equal access to written notifications.
Because New Mexico’s proposed rule
provides additional access to written
notification of agency decisions, we find
that NMAC 19.8.11.1100.D(5) is no less
effective than 30 CFR 773.6(a)(3) and
approve it.
6. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.E(3), Public
Notices of Filing of Permit Applications
New Mexico proposed a provision at
NMAC 19.8.11.1100.E(3) that requires
written notification to be posted on a
Web site maintained by the director
after receipt of a complete application.
This proposed rule creates and requires
an additional way to notify the public
about a permit application. Although
there is no Federal counterpart that
exists, this provision expands upon the
requirements listed in 30 CFR 773.6(a)
and is therefore no less effective than 30
CFR. We approve this proposed
revision.
7. NMAC 19.8.11.1103.B, 30 CFR
773.6(c)(2), Hearings and Conferences
New Mexico proposed to add a
provision that in addition to ‘‘any
person, whose interests are or may be
adversely affected by the issuance,
revision or renewal of the permit, or the
officer or head of any federal, state,
tribal or local government agency or
authority’’, the director may also motion
for an informal conference. This
proposed change is more inclusive than
the Federal counterpart at 30 CFR
773.6(c)(2), since an additional entity
may request an informal conference.
Therefore, we approve this proposed
revision to NMAC 19.8.11.1103.B.
8. NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E, 30 CFR
773.6(c)(2) and 30 CFR 775.11, Hearings
and Conferences
New Mexico proposed to repeal the
‘‘public hearing’’ option at
19.8.11.1103.E. Since 30 CFR has no
part about ‘‘public hearings’’, only
‘‘informal conferences’’ at 30 CFR
773.6(c) (pre-approval of permit
application) and ‘‘hearings’’ at 30 CFR
775.11 (after notification of decision
concerning the application) in relation
to the permit application process, the
State thought this part should be
omitted to be more consistent with 30
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
68342
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
CFR. New Mexico’s rules concerning
informal conferences at NMAC
19.8.11.1103.A and B, like their Federal
counterpart at 30 CFR 773.6(c)(2),
include procedural guidelines for
requesting an informal conference on
any permit application, rules for
conducting an informal conference
(notification of location, time, and date
of informal conference and who shall
conduct the informal conference), and
rules concerning requesting access to
the permit area for informationgathering purposes. The rules at
19.8.11.1103 are as effective as the
Federal counterpart at 30 CFR 773.6(c).
Of great importance is the proposed
deletion of the following language at
NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E concerning a
person’s right to present evidence, give
testimony, etc. at the hearing:
NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E(5), which states
that ‘‘any person desiring to present
evidence or give testimony at the
hearing on the proposed plan shall:
(a) File a request to do so with the
director at least ten days prior to the
hearing;
(b) Contain the name and address of
the person desiring to participate; and
(c) Contain a concise statement of the
nature of the person’s interest’’ and
NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E(7), which states
that ‘‘any person who has filed a timely
request to participate in the hearing
shall be given reasonable time at the
hearing to submit relevant evidence,
data and views, and shall be allowed to
call and examine witnesses, introduce
exhibits, cross examine witnesses and
submit rebuttal evidence.’’
It is essential that a person is
provided the opportunity to present
evidence, give testimony, cross examine
witnesses, etc. at a hearing that is
adjudicatory in nature.
The above two rules are addressed at
NMAC 19.8.12.1200, Administrative
Review By The Director (equivalent to
the Federal regulation at 30 CFR 775.11,
Administrative and Judicial Review of
Decisions). 30 CFR 775.11 and NMAC
19.8.12.1200 both pertain to the request
of a hearing on the reasons for the final
decision after the applicant is notified
of the final decision concerning the
application.
It was a concern that the deletion of
NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E would eliminate
the opportunity for a person to request
a hearing after the decision, but this
option is clearly addressed and allowed
by NMAC 19.8.12.1200.A, which states
that ‘‘within 30 days after the applicant
or permittee is notified of the final
decision of the director concerning the
application for a permit, revision or
renewal thereof, application for transfer,
sale, or assignment of rights, or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:43 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
concerning an application for coal
exploration, or pursuant to Paragraph
(2) of Subsection E of 19.8.13.1301
NMAC a decision regarding a permit
modification, the applicant, permittee or
any person with an interest which is or
may be adversely affected may request
a hearing on the reasons for the final
decision in accordance with this
section. Such request shall be in writing
and state with reasonable specificity the
reasons for the request and objections to
the director’s decision’’. Part B
continues, ‘‘The director shall
commence the hearing within 30 days of
such request. This hearing shall be of
record, adjudicatory in nature, and no
person who presided at an informal
conference under 19.8.11.1103 NMAC
shall either preside at the hearing or
participate in the decision following the
hearing, or in any administrative appeal
therefrom’’. Part 19.8.12.1200.B(1)
addresses the granting of temporary
relief, and is not relevant to this
discussion. Part 19.8.12.1200.B(2)
continues, ‘‘For the purpose of such
hearing, the director may administer
oaths and affirmation, subpoena
witnesses, written or printed materials,
compel attendance of witnesses or
production of those materials, compel
discovery, and take evidence, including,
but not limited to, site inspections of the
land to be affected and other surface
coal mining and reclamation operations
carried on by the applicant in the
general vicinity of the proposed
operations’’. Continuing with the rules
at NMAC 1200, NMAC
19.8.12.1200.B(3) requires the director
to issue and furnish the applicant and
hearing participants with the written
findings of fact, conclusions of law, and
order of the director (with respect to the
appeal) within a specified time period
(see section 69–25A–29 New Mexico
Statutes 1978 Annotated (NMSA)).
These requirements parallel the
requirements of 30 CFR 775.11(b)(4).
NMAC 19.8.12.1200.B(4) explains that
the burden of proof is on the party
seeking to reverse the decision of the
director. 30 CFR 775.11(b)(5) uses
similar language, ‘‘The burden of proof
at such hearings shall be on the party
seeking to reverse the decision of the
regulatory authority’’.
We believe that the language at
NMAC 19.8.12.1200 adequately replaces
the omitted parts of 19.8.11.1103.E and
is as effective as the SMCRA counterpart
at 775.11. We approve these changes.
9. NMAC 19.8.11.1103.F, 30 CFR
773.6(c)(2), Hearings and Conferences
New Mexico proposed to omit NMAC
19.8.11.1103.F concerning public
hearings. The unavailability of an
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
informal conference if a public hearing
is held is irrelevant since 19.8.11.1103.E
(Public hearings) is proposed to be
deleted. We agree with New Mexico’s
reasoning and therefore approve this
change.
10. NMAC 19.8.13.1301.E(2)(a), 30 CFR
773.19(b), Permit Revisions
New Mexico proposed this revision in
an attempt to clarify who ‘‘interested
parties’’ are. The new language specifies
that a written copy of decision must
now be mailed to ‘‘all persons on a list
maintained by the director who have
requested notice of applications under
the act’’. New Mexico borrows this
language from its Hard Rock Mining
program, where there is an extensive list
of people who have requested to be
informed of all hard rock permitting
activity. This proposed change to
NMAC 19.8.13.1301.E(2)(a) offers more
clarification and expands upon the
Federal counterpart at 30 CFR 773.19(b).
For this reason, we find New Mexico’s
proposed revision to be consistent with
and no less effective than its Federal
counterpart at 30 CFR 773.19(b) and we
approve it.
11. NMAC 19.8.31.3106.B(3)(a), 30 CFR
845.18(b)(3)(i), Procedure for
Assessment Conference
30 CFR 845.18(b)(3)(i) requires that
the settlement agreement shall be
prepared and signed by the conference
officer on behalf of the Office and by the
person assessed for the civil penalty.
New Mexico proposed the addition of
inadvertently missing language to
19.8.31.3106.B(3)(a) to make it no less
effective than the Federal counterpart at
30 CFR 845.18(b)(3)(i); with the
additional requirement that the director,
as well as the person assessed, must
sign the settlement agreement. We find
that this proposed language is no less
effective than the Federal counterpart at
30 CFR 845.18(b)(3)(i) and therefore
approve this proposed revision to
NMAC 19.8.31.3106.B(3)(a).
The following parts have been
amended to include the word ‘‘tribal’’
any time there is reference to any
Federal, State, or local government
agency. For example, at
19.8.13.1307.B(2), it is stated that ‘‘Any
person whose interests are or may be
adversely affected, including, but not
limited to, the head of any local, state,
tribal, or federal government agency
may submit written comments on the
application * * * ’’.
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
12. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.D(1), 30 CFR
773.6(a)(3), Public Notices of Filing of
Permit Applications
13. NMAC 19.8.11.1102.A, 30 CFR
773.6(b)(2), Right To File Written
Objections
14. NMAC 19.8.11.1103.A, 30 CFR
773.6(c)(1), Hearings and Conferences
15. NMAC 19.8.13.1307.B(2), 30 CFR
774.17(c), Transfer, Assignment or Sale
of Permit Rights: Obtaining Approval
16. NMAC 19.8.14.1412.A(2)(f), 30 CFR
800.40(a)(2), Requirement To Release
Performance Bonds
17. NMAC 19.8.14.1412.F, 30 CFR
800.40(f), Requirement To Release
Performance Bonds
In a conversation with the State
(Administrative Record No. OSM–2007–
0021–0006, ‘Conversation Record’), it
was clarified that New Mexico has
always considered the tribes to be a
local government agency. Historically,
New Mexico has shown great concern
for the tribes and has included them any
time other government agencies have
been involved. OSM recognizes the
tribes’ role and the importance of the
tribes’ involvement to the State.
Although 30 CFR does not include
tribes in its language at the above listed
Federal counterparts, it supports New
Mexico’s revisions because they are
potentially more inclusive than the
Federal regulations.
D. Revisions to New Mexico’s Rules
With No Corresponding Federal
Regulations
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
1. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.F, Public Notices
of Filing of Permit Applications
New Mexico proposed to add the
following parts to 19.8.11.1100 NMAC:
F. Public meeting. Within sixty days of
receipt of a complete application for a new
permit or a permit revision, the director shall
hold a public meeting at a location near the
proposed mining operation.
(1) The public meeting will serve as an
opportunity for the director and applicant to
inform the public of the proposed action and
to provide an opportunity for the public to
identify issues and concerns associated with
the application.
(2) The director shall give notice at least
fifteen days prior to the meeting date in a
newspaper of general circulation and on
radio stations serving the mine area.
(3) The director or his representative shall
keep a record summarizing issues and
concerns raised at the meeting.
(4) Any person attending the meeting may
submit written comments to the director up
to thirty days after the meeting.
New Mexico proposes to add language
that requires a public meeting to be held
to afford the community the opportunity
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:43 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
to gain information about the permit
application. At least fifteen days prior to
the public meeting, the director shall
give notice of the meeting in a
newspaper of general circulation and on
radio stations serving the mine area. At
this public meeting, the applicant and
the State will inform the public of the
proposed action. Up to thirty days after
the public meeting, attendees may
submit written comments to the
director.
The public meeting is an addition to
the provision at NMAC 19.8.11.1103.A,
whereby any person whose interests are
or may be adversely affected by the
issuance, revision, or renewal of a
permit may request an informal
conference by rule NMAC
19.8.11.1103.A. New Mexico’s informal
conference is consistent with
opportunities for an informal conference
at 30 CFR 773.6(c)(1).
There is no direct 30 CFR counterpart
to the added requirement of a public
meeting at NMAC 19.8.11.1100.F.
However, OSM supports any additional
outreach to and informative
opportunities for the public during the
notification process. Because New
Mexico’s additions to NMAC result in
more public notification than 30 CFR
773.6 requires, they are no less effective
than the Federal regulations relating to
public notification of permit
applications. We approve these changes
to New Mexico Administrative Code.
2. 19.8.11.1109.B and 19.8.11.1109.C,
Permit Approval or Denial Actions
New Mexico proposed to eliminate
references to public hearings at NMAC
19.8.11.1109.B and C, since the
proposed deletion of 19.8.11.1103.E
(Hearings and Conferences: Public
hearing) will omit any language about
public hearings. The language must now
only refer to the informal conference
that exists at 19.8.11.1103. We approve
this proposed revision.
3. 19.8.13.1301.E(1), Permit Revisions
The State proposed to remove the
following language associated with
applications for a permit revision: ‘‘(any
application for a revision) * * * that
proposes significant alterations in the
operations described in the materials
submitted in the application for the
original permit under 19.8.7 NMAC,
19.8.8 NMAC, 19.8.9 NMAC, or 19.8.10
NMAC, or in the conditions of the
original permit * * * (shall, at a
minimum, be subject to the
requirements of 19.8.11 NMAC and
19.8.12 NMAC)’’. Rule
19.8.13.1301.A(1) already describes
when it is necessary for a permit
revision to be obtained, stating that ‘‘a
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68343
revision to a permit shall be obtained for
changes in the surface coal mining or
reclamation operation as described in
the original application and approved
under the original permit, when such
changes constitute a significant
departure from the method of
conducting mining or reclamation
operations contemplated by the original
permit * * *’’. Consequently, this
language is repetitive and unnecessary,
and OSM approves the removal of this
language.
IV. Summary and Disposition of
Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the
amendment (Administrative Record No.
OSM–2007–0021–0001), but did not
receive any.
Federal Agency Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and
section 503(b) of SMCRA, we requested
comments on the amendment from
various Federal agencies with an actual
or potential interest in the New Mexico
program (Administrative Record No.
OSM–2007–0021–0003). We did not
receive any comments from other
Federal agencies.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and
(ii), we are required to get concurrence
from EPA for those provisions of the
program amendment that relate to air or
water quality standards issued under
the authority of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
None of the revisions that New
Mexico proposed to make in this
amendment pertain to air or water
quality standards. Therefore, we did not
ask EPA to concur on the amendment.
State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are
required to request comments from the
SHPO and ACHP on amendments that
may have an effect on historic
properties. On January 16, 2008, we
requested comments on New Mexico’s
amendment (Administrative Record No.
OSM–2007–0021–0002), but neither
responded to our request.
V. OSM’s Decision
Based on the above findings, we
approve New Mexico’s November 28,
2007, amendment.
To implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations at 30
CFR Part 931, which codify decisions
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
68344
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
concerning the New Mexico program.
We find that good cause exists under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make this final rule
effective immediately. Section 503(a) of
SMCRA requires that the State’s
program demonstrates that the State has
the capability of carrying out the
provisions of the Act and meeting its
purposes. Making this regulation
effective immediately will expedite that
process. SMCRA requires consistency of
State and Federal standards.
Effect of OSM’s Decision
Section 503 of SMCRA provides that
a State may not exercise jurisdiction
under SMCRA unless the State program
is approved by the Secretary. Similarly,
30 CFR 732.17(a) requires that any
change of an approved State program be
submitted to OSM for review as a
program amendment. The Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(g) prohibit
any changes to approved State programs
that are not approved by OSM. In the
oversight of the New Mexico program,
we will recognize only the statutes,
regulations and other materials we have
approved, together with any consistent
implementing policies, directives and
other materials. We will require New
Mexico to enforce only those approved
provisions.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review).
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:43 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federally
recognized Indian Tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
CFR U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State
regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C) et seq.).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million.
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S. based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the
fact that the State submittal which is the
subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded Mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the fact that the State submittal, which
is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the federal
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
Dated: October 9, 2008.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Western Region.
68345
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
■
§ 931.15 Approval of New Mexico
regulatory program amendments
1. The authority citation for part 931
continues to read as follows:
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
2. Section 931.15 is amended in the
table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ‘‘Date of Final
Publication’’ to read as follows:
PART 931—New Mexico
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 931
*
■
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 30 CFR part 931 is amended
as set forth below:
■
*
*
*
*
Original amendment
submission date
Date of final
publication
Citation/description
*
November 28, 2007 ...
*
November 18, 2008 ..
*
*
*
*
*
19 NMAC Parts 1 through 35 (recodification), 19.8.1.7.G(1); 19.8.11.1100.D(1); 19.8.11.1102.A;
19.8.11.1103.A; 19.8.11.1109.B and C; 19.8.13.1301.E(1) and E(2)(b); 19.8.13.1307.B(2);
19.8.14.1412.A(2)(f); 19.8.14.1412.F; 19.8.20.2065.A and B(1); 19.8.20.2068; 19.8.30.3000;
19.8.31.3108.B; 19.8.31.3110.B; 19.8.5.504.D; 19.8.7.701.F; 19.8.8.812.D; 19.8.11.1100.B(1),
(2), (3), and (4), D(5), E(3), and F; 19.8.11.1103.B, E, and F; 19.8.13.1301.E(2)(a);
19.8.31.3106.B(3)(a).
[FR Doc. E8–27360 Filed 11–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2008–1104]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Elizabeth River—Eastern Branch, at
Norfolk, VA, Maintenance
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast
Guard District, has approved a
temporary deviation from the
regulations governing the operation of
the Norfolk Southern Railroad (NS#
V2.8) Bridge, at mile 2.7, across the
Elizabeth River—Eastern Branch at
Norfolk, VA. Under this temporary
deviation, the drawbridge may remain
in the closed position on specific dates
and times to facilitate mechanical
repairs.
This deviation is effective from
7 a.m. on December 8, 2008, to 11 p.m.
on December 19, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2008–
1104 and are available online at
www.regulations.gov. They are also
available for inspection or copying at
two locations: The Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:43 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
and the Commander (dpb), Fifth Coast
Guard District, Federal Building, 1st
Floor, 431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth,
VA 23704–5004 between 8 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Bill H. Brazier, Bridge Management
Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at
(757) 398–6422.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Norfolk Southern Corporation, who
owns and operates this single-leaf
bascule drawbridge, has requested a
temporary deviation from the current
operating regulations set out in 33 CFR
117.1007(a) to facilitate mechanical
repairs.
The NS# V2.8 Bridge, a swing-type
drawbridge, has a vertical clearance in
the closed position to vessels of six feet,
above mean high water
To facilitate repairs to the center
wedge machinery of the swing span, the
drawbridge will be maintained in the
closed-to-navigation position from 7
a.m. on December 8, 2008, until and
including 11 p.m. on December 19,
2008.
The Coast Guard will inform the users
of the waterway through our Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the
opening restrictions of the draw span to
minimize transiting delays caused by
the temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: November 5, 2008.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Chief, Bridge Administration Branch Fifth
Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E8–27266 Filed 11–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket Nos. MC2009–4 and CP2009–5;
Order No. 131]
Administrative Practice and Procedure,
Postal Service
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is adding
Priority Mail Contract 3 (MC2009–4 and
CP2009–5) to the Competitive Product
List. It is also noticing a related contract.
These actions are consistent with
changes in a recent law governing postal
operations and a related Postal Service
request. Republication of the lists of
market dominant and competitive
products is also consistent with new
requirements in the law.
DATES: Effective November 18, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
Regulatory
History, 73 FR 66075 (November 6,
2008).
The Postal Service seeks to add a new
product identified as Priority Mail
Contract 3 to the Competitive Product
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\18NOR1.SGM
18NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 18, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68339-68345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27360]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 931
[SATS Number NM-047-FOR]
New Mexico Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are approving an amendment to the New Mexico regulatory
program (the ``New Mexico program'') under the Surface Mining Control
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). New Mexico is proposing
additions to and revisions of the New Mexico Administrative Code (NMAC)
to improve and clarify the public notification process during
permitting actions, to correct outdated citations, and to comply with
formatting requirements for New Mexico administrative law. The
revisions also include non-substantive editorial changes. New Mexico
revised its program to provide additional safeguards, clarify
ambiguities, and achieve stylistic consistency.
DATES: Effective Date: November 18, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob Postle, Branch Chief, Field
Operations, Program Support Division; Telephone: (505) 248-5070;
Internet address: bpostle@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the New Mexico Program
II. Submission of the Proposed Amendment
III. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement's (OSM's)
Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSM's Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the New Mexico Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, ``a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (a)(7).
On the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the New Mexico program on December 31, 1980. You
can find background information on the New Mexico program, including
the Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions
of approval in the December 31, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 86459).
You can also find later actions concerning New Mexico's program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 931.10, 931.11, 931.13, 931.15, 931.16,
and 931.30.
II. Submission of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated November 28, 2007, New Mexico sent us an amendment
to its program (SATS number NM-047-FOR; Administrative Record No. OSM-
2007-0021-0002) under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). New Mexico sent
the amendment to include changes made at its own initiative.
We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the January 11,
2008, Federal Register (73 FR 1983). In the same document, we opened
the public comment period and provided an opportunity for a public
hearing or meeting on the amendment's adequacy (Administrative Record
No. OSM-2007-0021-0002). We did not hold a public hearing or meeting
because no one requested one. The public comment period ended on
February 11, 2008. We did not receive any comments.
III. OSM's Findings
Following are the findings we made concerning the amendment under
SMCRA and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. We are
approving the amendment.
A. Minor Revisions to New Mexico's Rules
New Mexico proposed minor wording, editorial, punctuation,
grammatical, citation, stylistic, and recodification changes to the
following previously approved rules at NMAC:
19.8.1.7.B(1); G(1); N, and R(3)--Definitions
19.8.2.201.B.(2)(a)--Areas Where Mining Is Prohibited or
Limited
19.8.2.202.F--Procedures/Review by Other Agencies
19.8.4.401.A and B--Procedures: Initial.
Processing, Record-Keeping, and Notification Requirements
19.8.4.402.B--Procedures: Hearing Requirements
19.8.5.504.B--Permit Application Filing Deadlines
19.8.6.601.F--General Requirements: Exploration of Less Than
250 Tons
19.8.6.603.B(2)--Applications: Approval or Disapproval of
Exploration of More Than 250 Tons
19.8.6.606.B--Public Availability of Information
19.8.7.705.A--Permit Term Information
19.8.7.708--Identification of Location of Public Office for
Filing of Application
19.8.8.801.B--General Environmental Resources Information
19.8.8.803.B--Geology Description
19.8.8.814.A, B(5), D, and D(2)--Prime Farmland Investigation
19.8.9.901.B(1) and B(3)--Operation Plan: Existing Structures
19.8.9.903.B(3)--Operation Plan: Maps and Plans
19.8.9.906.B(2)--Reclamation Plan: General Requirements
19.8.9.907.B(1)--Reclamation Plan: Protection of Hydrologic
Balance
19.8.9.909.A(2)--Reclamation Plan: Ponds, Impoundments, Banks,
Dams, and Embankments
19.8.9.913--Relocation or Use of Public Roads
19.8.9.916--Transportation Facilities
[[Page 68340]]
19.8.9.917--Return of Coal Processing Waste to Abandoned
Underground Workings
19.8.10.1000.A(4)(a) and A(4)(b)--Experimental Practices in
Mining
19.8.10.1000.E--Experimental Practices in Mining
19.8.10.1001.A, B(1)(b), and (C)--Mountaintop Removal Mining
19.8.10.1002.B and C--Steep Slope Mining
19.8.10.1003.A(3) and A(4)(c)--Permits Incorporating Variances
From Approximate Original Contour Restoration Requirements for Steep
Slope Mining
19.8.10.1004.A(1), A(4), and B--Prime Farmlands
19.8.10.1005.B(8)--Variances for Delay in Contemporaneous
Reclamation Required in Combined Surface and Underground Mining
Operations
19.8.10.1006.C--Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operation
on Areas or Adjacent to Areas Including Alluvial Valley Floors
19.8.11.1100.A(3)--Public Notices of Filing of Permit
Applications
19.8.11.1101.A and C--Opportunity for Submission of Written
Comments on Permit Applications
19.8.11.1102.B(2)--Right to File Written Objections
19.8.11.1103.B(4)--Hearings and Conferences
19.8.11.1105.B--Review of Permit Applications
19.8.11.1106.K--Criteria for Approval or Denial
19.8.11.1108.C--Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial:
Existing Structures
19.8.11.1109.F--Permit Approval or Denial Actions
19.8.11.1111.B(4)--Permit Terms
19.8.11.1112.C--Conditions of Permits: General and Right of
Entry
19.8.13.1301.G--Permit Revisions
19.8.13.1303.A(3) and B(2)--Permit Renewals: Complete
Applications
19.8.13.1305.A(4)--Permit Renewals: Approval or Denial
19.8.13.1307.A(2)(d), B, and C(2)--Transfer, Assignment or
Sale of Permit Rights: Obtaining Approval
19.8.14.1401.B and D--Requirement to File a Bond
19.8.14.1403.A, C, D, D(1), and D(2)--Period of Liability
19.8.14.1406.C, D, E, and E(2)--General Terms and Conditions
of Bond
19.8.14.1407.A, B(1), and B(4)--Bond Requirements for
Underground Coal Mines and Long-Term Coal-Related Surface Facilities
and Structures
19.8.14.1409.A(1), B(3), D(1), and E--Collateral Bonds
19.8.14.1410.D(4)--Self-Bonding
19.8.14.1411.B--Replacement of Bonds
19.8.14.1412.A(3), B(2), C(2), and D--Requirement to Release
Performance Bonds
19.8.14.1413.A(2)(b), C, and D--Forfeiture Bonds
19.8.14.1414.B and D--Terms and Conditions for Liability
Insurance
19.8.19.1902.C and C(3)(c)--Performance Standards for Coal
Exploration
19.8.20.2010.A--Hydrologic Balance: Water Quality Standards
and Effluent Limitations
19.8.20.2017.E(1), E(2), E(4), and E(6)--Hydrologic Balance:
Permanent and Temporary Impoundments
19.8.20.2019--Hydrologic Balance: Protection of Ground Water
Recharge Capacity
19.8.20.2026.B, B(1), and B(2)--Hydrologic Balance:
Underground Mine Entry and Access Discharges
19.8.20.2037.B--Disposal of Excess Spoil: Durable Rock Fills
19.8.20.2047--Coal Processing Waste: Dams and Embankments:
General Requirements
19.8.20.2049.A(1)--Coal Processing Waste: Dams and
Embankments: Design and Construction
19.8.20.2050--Air Resources Protection
19.8.20.2056--Backfilling and Grading: Covering Coal And Acid-
and Toxic-forming Material
19.8.20.2065 and 2065.B--Revegetation: Standards for Success
19.8.20.2066--Revegetation: Tree and Shrub Stocking
19.8.24.2404.C(4)(a) and (b), C(5), and C(6)--Prime Farmland:
Revegetation
19.8.26.2601.A, A(2), and D--Steep Slopes: Performance
Standards
19.8.27.2701.B--Coal Processing Plants: Performance Standards
19.8.29.2900.B and H--Inspections
19.8.30.3001.J--Notices of Violation
19.8.30.3002.D--Permit Suspension or Revocation
19.8.31.3105.B--Procedure for Civil Penalty Assessment
19.8.31.3106.B and D--Procedure for Assessment Conference
19.8.31.3110.A--Amount of Individual Civil Penalty
19.8.34.3400--Scope
19.8.34.3401--Definition
19.8.34.3402 and 3402.A--Application Requirements and
Procedures
19.8.34.3403--Contents of Applications for Exemption
19.8.34.3404--Public Availability of Information
19.8.34.3405--Requirements for Exemptions
19.8.34.3406--Conditions of Exemption and Right of Inspection
and Entry
19.8.34.3407--Stockpiling of Minerals
19.8.34.3408 and 3408.C--Revocation and Enforcement
19.8.34.3409, 3409.A and A(2)--Reporting Requirements
19.8.35.12.C--How a Decision on a VER Request Will be Made
19.8.35.14--Availability of Records for VER Requests and
Determinations
Because these changes are minor and nonsubstantive in nature, we
find that they will not make New Mexico's previously approved rules
less effective than the corresponding Federal regulations.
B. Revisions to New Mexico's Rules That Have the Same Meaning as the
Corresponding Provisions of the Federal Regulations
New Mexico proposed revisions to the following rules containing
language that is the same as or is similar to the corresponding
sections of the Federal regulations (NMAC citation followed by Federal
counterpart citation and NMAC section title):
19.8.1.7.G(1), 30 CFR 707.5, Definitions
19.8.13.1301.E(2)(b), 30 CFR 775.11(a), Permit Revisions
19.8.20.2065.A, 30 CFR 817.116(a)(1), Revegetation: Standards
for Success
19.8.20.2065.B(1), 30 CFR 817.116(a)(2), Revegetation:
Standards for Success
19.8.20.2068, 30 CFR 817.122, Subsidence Control: Public
Notice
19.8.30.3000, 30 CFR 843.11(c), Cessation Orders
19.8.31.3108.B, 30 CFR 845.20(b), Final Assessment and Payment
of Penalty
19.8.31.3110.B, 30 CFR 846.14(b), Amount of Individual Civil
Penalty
Because these proposed rules contain language that is the same as
or similar to the corresponding Federal regulations, we find that they
are no less effective than the corresponding Federal regulations.
C. Revisions to New Mexico's Rules That Are Not the Same as the
Corresponding Provisions of the Federal Regulations
1. NMAC 19.8.5.504.D, 30 CFR 773.6(c), Permit Application Filing
Deadlines
New Mexico proposed to eliminate NMAC 19.8.5.504.D concerning
applications for a permit to conduct surface coal mining and
reclamation operations that do not meet the requirements of NMAC
19.8.5.501 and 19.8.5.502. NMAC 19.8.5.501 and 19.8.5.502 concern
continuing interim
[[Page 68341]]
program permits and Federal permits, respectively. There are no longer
any such interim or Federal permits that need to be continued in New
Mexico, so citing them in this section is moot.
New Mexico also omitted the last sentence of 19.8.5.504.D, which
makes reference to the rules and regulations of NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E,
since 1103.E is proposed to be deleted with this amendment package. We
approve these changes to New Mexico Administrative Code.
2. NMAC 19.8.7.701.F, Identification of Interests
New Mexico's existing rules require the applicant to submit the
name and address of each owner of record of all property (surface and
subsurface) contiguous to any part of the proposed permit area. New
Mexico proposed to modify its existing rules by adding language that
requires the permit application to also include ``the owner of record
and residents of all dwellings and structures on and within one-half
mile (2640 feet) of any part of the proposed permit area''. This
provision adds specificity and is no less effective than the Federal
counterpart at 30 CFR 778.13(b), which requires ``the name and address
of each owner of record of all property (surface and subsurface)
contiguous to any part of the proposed permit area''. Therefore, we
find that NMAC 19.8.7.701.F is no less effective than 30 CFR 778.13(b)
and approve it.
3. NMAC 19.8.8.812.D, Maps: General Requirements
New Mexico proposed to modify its existing rules by adding language
at NMAC 19.8.8.812.D, which coincides with the above listed proposed
change to NMAC 19.8.7.701.F. The proposed revision to 812.D ensures
that dwellings and structures, and names of present owners of record
and residents of those dwellings and structures, on and within one-half
mile (2640 feet) of the proposed permit area are included on the permit
application maps. New Mexico's proposed rule includes a larger area and
therefore protects more dwellings and structures than the Federal
counterpart at 30 CFR 779.24(d) which requires that only the location
of all buildings on and within 1000 feet of the proposed permit area
are included on the permit application maps. For this reason, we find
that NMAC 19.8.812.D is no less effective than 30 CFR 778.13(b) and
approve this proposed change.
4. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.B(1) Through (4), Public Notices of Filing of
Permit Applications
New Mexico added language to NMAC 19.8.11.1100 which expands upon
the Federal counterpart rules at 30 CFR 773.6(a) concerning public
participation and public notification in the permitting processing. New
Mexico proposed to modify its rules to expand the options for
notification of permit applications. The added language requires the
permit applicant to: ``* * * Submit, at the time of filing the
application, a plan approved by the director [of the New Mexico
program] to provide notice using at least three of the methods listed
below. If the director determines that significant non-English speaking
populations live within the general area of the proposed mine, the
applicant shall include at least one method that seeks to reach these
populations. The notice shall summarize the information listed in, and
shall be given prior to the last publication of the notice in,
Subsection A of 19.8.11.1100 NMAC. The methods may include:
(1) Mailing a notice to the owners of record, as shown by the most
recent property tax schedule, of all properties adjacent to the
proposed permit area and to the owners of all properties containing a
residence located within one-half mile (2640 feet) of the proposed
permit area as identified in Subsection F of 19.8.7.701 NMAC;
(2) Posting a notice in at least four publicly accessible and
conspicuous places, including the entrance to the proposed operation if
that entrance is publicly accessible and conspicuous;
(3) Publishing a notice in a display ad at least three inches by
four inches at a place in the newspaper calculated to give the general
public the most effective notice; or
(4) Broadcasting public service announcements on radio stations
that serve the general permit area''.
OSM supports any additional outreach to the public during the
notification process. Because New Mexico's additions to NMAC result in
more public notification than 30 CFR 773.6 requires, they are no less
effective than the Federal regulations relating to public notification
of permit applications. We approve these changes.
5. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.D(5), Public Notices of Filing of Permit
Applications
New Mexico proposed to modify its existing rules to require that,
in addition to Federal, State, Tribal, and local government agencies,
governmental planning agencies, sewage and water treatment authorities,
and water companies, written notifications shall also be sent to ``all
persons on a list, maintained by the director, of individuals and
organizations who have requested notice of applications under the act
and who have provided a surface or electronic mail address to the
director''. This means that in addition to the above listed agencies,
non-agency interested parties or individuals have equal access to
written notifications. Because New Mexico's proposed rule provides
additional access to written notification of agency decisions, we find
that NMAC 19.8.11.1100.D(5) is no less effective than 30 CFR
773.6(a)(3) and approve it.
6. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.E(3), Public Notices of Filing of Permit
Applications
New Mexico proposed a provision at NMAC 19.8.11.1100.E(3) that
requires written notification to be posted on a Web site maintained by
the director after receipt of a complete application. This proposed
rule creates and requires an additional way to notify the public about
a permit application. Although there is no Federal counterpart that
exists, this provision expands upon the requirements listed in 30 CFR
773.6(a) and is therefore no less effective than 30 CFR. We approve
this proposed revision.
7. NMAC 19.8.11.1103.B, 30 CFR 773.6(c)(2), Hearings and Conferences
New Mexico proposed to add a provision that in addition to ``any
person, whose interests are or may be adversely affected by the
issuance, revision or renewal of the permit, or the officer or head of
any federal, state, tribal or local government agency or authority'',
the director may also motion for an informal conference. This proposed
change is more inclusive than the Federal counterpart at 30 CFR
773.6(c)(2), since an additional entity may request an informal
conference. Therefore, we approve this proposed revision to NMAC
19.8.11.1103.B.
8. NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E, 30 CFR 773.6(c)(2) and 30 CFR 775.11, Hearings
and Conferences
New Mexico proposed to repeal the ``public hearing'' option at
19.8.11.1103.E. Since 30 CFR has no part about ``public hearings'',
only ``informal conferences'' at 30 CFR 773.6(c) (pre-approval of
permit application) and ``hearings'' at 30 CFR 775.11 (after
notification of decision concerning the application) in relation to the
permit application process, the State thought this part should be
omitted to be more consistent with 30
[[Page 68342]]
CFR. New Mexico's rules concerning informal conferences at NMAC
19.8.11.1103.A and B, like their Federal counterpart at 30 CFR
773.6(c)(2), include procedural guidelines for requesting an informal
conference on any permit application, rules for conducting an informal
conference (notification of location, time, and date of informal
conference and who shall conduct the informal conference), and rules
concerning requesting access to the permit area for information-
gathering purposes. The rules at 19.8.11.1103 are as effective as the
Federal counterpart at 30 CFR 773.6(c).
Of great importance is the proposed deletion of the following
language at NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E concerning a person's right to present
evidence, give testimony, etc. at the hearing:
NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E(5), which states that ``any person desiring to
present evidence or give testimony at the hearing on the proposed plan
shall:
(a) File a request to do so with the director at least ten days
prior to the hearing;
(b) Contain the name and address of the person desiring to
participate; and
(c) Contain a concise statement of the nature of the person's
interest'' and NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E(7), which states that ``any person
who has filed a timely request to participate in the hearing shall be
given reasonable time at the hearing to submit relevant evidence, data
and views, and shall be allowed to call and examine witnesses,
introduce exhibits, cross examine witnesses and submit rebuttal
evidence.''
It is essential that a person is provided the opportunity to
present evidence, give testimony, cross examine witnesses, etc. at a
hearing that is adjudicatory in nature.
The above two rules are addressed at NMAC 19.8.12.1200,
Administrative Review By The Director (equivalent to the Federal
regulation at 30 CFR 775.11, Administrative and Judicial Review of
Decisions). 30 CFR 775.11 and NMAC 19.8.12.1200 both pertain to the
request of a hearing on the reasons for the final decision after the
applicant is notified of the final decision concerning the application.
It was a concern that the deletion of NMAC 19.8.11.1103.E would
eliminate the opportunity for a person to request a hearing after the
decision, but this option is clearly addressed and allowed by NMAC
19.8.12.1200.A, which states that ``within 30 days after the applicant
or permittee is notified of the final decision of the director
concerning the application for a permit, revision or renewal thereof,
application for transfer, sale, or assignment of rights, or concerning
an application for coal exploration, or pursuant to Paragraph (2) of
Subsection E of 19.8.13.1301 NMAC a decision regarding a permit
modification, the applicant, permittee or any person with an interest
which is or may be adversely affected may request a hearing on the
reasons for the final decision in accordance with this section. Such
request shall be in writing and state with reasonable specificity the
reasons for the request and objections to the director's decision''.
Part B continues, ``The director shall commence the hearing within 30
days of such request. This hearing shall be of record, adjudicatory in
nature, and no person who presided at an informal conference under
19.8.11.1103 NMAC shall either preside at the hearing or participate in
the decision following the hearing, or in any administrative appeal
therefrom''. Part 19.8.12.1200.B(1) addresses the granting of temporary
relief, and is not relevant to this discussion. Part 19.8.12.1200.B(2)
continues, ``For the purpose of such hearing, the director may
administer oaths and affirmation, subpoena witnesses, written or
printed materials, compel attendance of witnesses or production of
those materials, compel discovery, and take evidence, including, but
not limited to, site inspections of the land to be affected and other
surface coal mining and reclamation operations carried on by the
applicant in the general vicinity of the proposed operations''.
Continuing with the rules at NMAC 1200, NMAC 19.8.12.1200.B(3) requires
the director to issue and furnish the applicant and hearing
participants with the written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and
order of the director (with respect to the appeal) within a specified
time period (see section 69-25A-29 New Mexico Statutes 1978 Annotated
(NMSA)). These requirements parallel the requirements of 30 CFR
775.11(b)(4). NMAC 19.8.12.1200.B(4) explains that the burden of proof
is on the party seeking to reverse the decision of the director. 30 CFR
775.11(b)(5) uses similar language, ``The burden of proof at such
hearings shall be on the party seeking to reverse the decision of the
regulatory authority''.
We believe that the language at NMAC 19.8.12.1200 adequately
replaces the omitted parts of 19.8.11.1103.E and is as effective as the
SMCRA counterpart at 775.11. We approve these changes.
9. NMAC 19.8.11.1103.F, 30 CFR 773.6(c)(2), Hearings and Conferences
New Mexico proposed to omit NMAC 19.8.11.1103.F concerning public
hearings. The unavailability of an informal conference if a public
hearing is held is irrelevant since 19.8.11.1103.E (Public hearings) is
proposed to be deleted. We agree with New Mexico's reasoning and
therefore approve this change.
10. NMAC 19.8.13.1301.E(2)(a), 30 CFR 773.19(b), Permit Revisions
New Mexico proposed this revision in an attempt to clarify who
``interested parties'' are. The new language specifies that a written
copy of decision must now be mailed to ``all persons on a list
maintained by the director who have requested notice of applications
under the act''. New Mexico borrows this language from its Hard Rock
Mining program, where there is an extensive list of people who have
requested to be informed of all hard rock permitting activity. This
proposed change to NMAC 19.8.13.1301.E(2)(a) offers more clarification
and expands upon the Federal counterpart at 30 CFR 773.19(b). For this
reason, we find New Mexico's proposed revision to be consistent with
and no less effective than its Federal counterpart at 30 CFR 773.19(b)
and we approve it.
11. NMAC 19.8.31.3106.B(3)(a), 30 CFR 845.18(b)(3)(i), Procedure for
Assessment Conference
30 CFR 845.18(b)(3)(i) requires that the settlement agreement shall
be prepared and signed by the conference officer on behalf of the
Office and by the person assessed for the civil penalty. New Mexico
proposed the addition of inadvertently missing language to
19.8.31.3106.B(3)(a) to make it no less effective than the Federal
counterpart at 30 CFR 845.18(b)(3)(i); with the additional requirement
that the director, as well as the person assessed, must sign the
settlement agreement. We find that this proposed language is no less
effective than the Federal counterpart at 30 CFR 845.18(b)(3)(i) and
therefore approve this proposed revision to NMAC 19.8.31.3106.B(3)(a).
The following parts have been amended to include the word
``tribal'' any time there is reference to any Federal, State, or local
government agency. For example, at 19.8.13.1307.B(2), it is stated that
``Any person whose interests are or may be adversely affected,
including, but not limited to, the head of any local, state, tribal, or
federal government agency may submit written comments on the
application * * * ''.
[[Page 68343]]
12. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.D(1), 30 CFR 773.6(a)(3), Public Notices of
Filing of Permit Applications
13. NMAC 19.8.11.1102.A, 30 CFR 773.6(b)(2), Right To File Written
Objections
14. NMAC 19.8.11.1103.A, 30 CFR 773.6(c)(1), Hearings and Conferences
15. NMAC 19.8.13.1307.B(2), 30 CFR 774.17(c), Transfer, Assignment or
Sale of Permit Rights: Obtaining Approval
16. NMAC 19.8.14.1412.A(2)(f), 30 CFR 800.40(a)(2), Requirement To
Release Performance Bonds
17. NMAC 19.8.14.1412.F, 30 CFR 800.40(f), Requirement To Release
Performance Bonds
In a conversation with the State (Administrative Record No. OSM-
2007-0021-0006, `Conversation Record'), it was clarified that New
Mexico has always considered the tribes to be a local government
agency. Historically, New Mexico has shown great concern for the tribes
and has included them any time other government agencies have been
involved. OSM recognizes the tribes' role and the importance of the
tribes' involvement to the State. Although 30 CFR does not include
tribes in its language at the above listed Federal counterparts, it
supports New Mexico's revisions because they are potentially more
inclusive than the Federal regulations.
D. Revisions to New Mexico's Rules With No Corresponding Federal
Regulations
1. NMAC 19.8.11.1100.F, Public Notices of Filing of Permit Applications
New Mexico proposed to add the following parts to 19.8.11.1100
NMAC:
F. Public meeting. Within sixty days of receipt of a complete
application for a new permit or a permit revision, the director
shall hold a public meeting at a location near the proposed mining
operation.
(1) The public meeting will serve as an opportunity for the
director and applicant to inform the public of the proposed action
and to provide an opportunity for the public to identify issues and
concerns associated with the application.
(2) The director shall give notice at least fifteen days prior
to the meeting date in a newspaper of general circulation and on
radio stations serving the mine area.
(3) The director or his representative shall keep a record
summarizing issues and concerns raised at the meeting.
(4) Any person attending the meeting may submit written comments
to the director up to thirty days after the meeting.
New Mexico proposes to add language that requires a public meeting
to be held to afford the community the opportunity to gain information
about the permit application. At least fifteen days prior to the public
meeting, the director shall give notice of the meeting in a newspaper
of general circulation and on radio stations serving the mine area. At
this public meeting, the applicant and the State will inform the public
of the proposed action. Up to thirty days after the public meeting,
attendees may submit written comments to the director.
The public meeting is an addition to the provision at NMAC
19.8.11.1103.A, whereby any person whose interests are or may be
adversely affected by the issuance, revision, or renewal of a permit
may request an informal conference by rule NMAC 19.8.11.1103.A. New
Mexico's informal conference is consistent with opportunities for an
informal conference at 30 CFR 773.6(c)(1).
There is no direct 30 CFR counterpart to the added requirement of a
public meeting at NMAC 19.8.11.1100.F. However, OSM supports any
additional outreach to and informative opportunities for the public
during the notification process. Because New Mexico's additions to NMAC
result in more public notification than 30 CFR 773.6 requires, they are
no less effective than the Federal regulations relating to public
notification of permit applications. We approve these changes to New
Mexico Administrative Code.
2. 19.8.11.1109.B and 19.8.11.1109.C, Permit Approval or Denial Actions
New Mexico proposed to eliminate references to public hearings at
NMAC 19.8.11.1109.B and C, since the proposed deletion of
19.8.11.1103.E (Hearings and Conferences: Public hearing) will omit any
language about public hearings. The language must now only refer to the
informal conference that exists at 19.8.11.1103. We approve this
proposed revision.
3. 19.8.13.1301.E(1), Permit Revisions
The State proposed to remove the following language associated with
applications for a permit revision: ``(any application for a revision)
* * * that proposes significant alterations in the operations described
in the materials submitted in the application for the original permit
under 19.8.7 NMAC, 19.8.8 NMAC, 19.8.9 NMAC, or 19.8.10 NMAC, or in the
conditions of the original permit * * * (shall, at a minimum, be
subject to the requirements of 19.8.11 NMAC and 19.8.12 NMAC)''. Rule
19.8.13.1301.A(1) already describes when it is necessary for a permit
revision to be obtained, stating that ``a revision to a permit shall be
obtained for changes in the surface coal mining or reclamation
operation as described in the original application and approved under
the original permit, when such changes constitute a significant
departure from the method of conducting mining or reclamation
operations contemplated by the original permit * * *''. Consequently,
this language is repetitive and unnecessary, and OSM approves the
removal of this language.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment (Administrative
Record No. OSM-2007-0021-0001), but did not receive any.
Federal Agency Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and section 503(b) of SMCRA, we
requested comments on the amendment from various Federal agencies with
an actual or potential interest in the New Mexico program
(Administrative Record No. OSM-2007-0021-0003). We did not receive any
comments from other Federal agencies.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and (ii), we are required to get
concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that
relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).
None of the revisions that New Mexico proposed to make in this
amendment pertain to air or water quality standards. Therefore, we did
not ask EPA to concur on the amendment.
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from
the SHPO and ACHP on amendments that may have an effect on historic
properties. On January 16, 2008, we requested comments on New Mexico's
amendment (Administrative Record No. OSM-2007-0021-0002), but neither
responded to our request.
V. OSM's Decision
Based on the above findings, we approve New Mexico's November 28,
2007, amendment.
To implement this decision, we are amending the Federal regulations
at 30 CFR Part 931, which codify decisions
[[Page 68344]]
concerning the New Mexico program. We find that good cause exists under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make this final rule effective immediately.
Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that the State's program demonstrates
that the State has the capability of carrying out the provisions of the
Act and meeting its purposes. Making this regulation effective
immediately will expedite that process. SMCRA requires consistency of
State and Federal standards.
Effect of OSM's Decision
Section 503 of SMCRA provides that a State may not exercise
jurisdiction under SMCRA unless the State program is approved by the
Secretary. Similarly, 30 CFR 732.17(a) requires that any change of an
approved State program be submitted to OSM for review as a program
amendment. The Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(g) prohibit any
changes to approved State programs that are not approved by OSM. In the
oversight of the New Mexico program, we will recognize only the
statutes, regulations and other materials we have approved, together
with any consistent implementing policies, directives and other
materials. We will require New Mexico to enforce only those approved
provisions.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review).
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally recognized Indian Tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian Tribes.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 CFR U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C) et seq.).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal
which is the subject of this rule is based upon counterpart Federal
regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made
that the Federal regulation was not considered a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded Mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the federal
[[Page 68345]]
regulation did not impose an unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 931
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: October 9, 2008.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Western Region.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 931 is amended as
set forth below:
PART 931--New Mexico
0
1. The authority citation for part 931 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 931.15 is amended in the table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ``Date of Final Publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 931.15 Approval of New Mexico regulatory program amendments
* * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission date Date of final publication Citation/description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
November 28, 2007..................... November 18, 2008..................... 19 NMAC Parts 1 through 35
(recodification),
19.8.1.7.G(1);
19.8.11.1100.D(1);
19.8.11.1102.A; 19.8.11.1103.A;
19.8.11.1109.B and C;
19.8.13.1301.E(1) and E(2)(b);
19.8.13.1307.B(2);
19.8.14.1412.A(2)(f);
19.8.14.1412.F; 19.8.20.2065.A
and B(1); 19.8.20.2068;
19.8.30.3000; 19.8.31.3108.B;
19.8.31.3110.B; 19.8.5.504.D;
19.8.7.701.F; 19.8.8.812.D;
19.8.11.1100.B(1), (2), (3),
and (4), D(5), E(3), and F;
19.8.11.1103.B, E, and F;
19.8.13.1301.E(2)(a);
19.8.31.3106.B(3)(a).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. E8-27360 Filed 11-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P