Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Swordfish Quotas, 68398-68403 [E8-27337]
Download as PDF
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
68398
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
addition, the notification will reduce
the length of the recreational SWG
fishing season the following fishing year
by the amount necessary to ensure gag
recreational landings do not exceed the
recreational target catch level in that
following fishing year. The applicable
recreational ACLs for gag, in gutted
weight, are 2.59 million lb (1.17 million
kg) for 2009, 2.64 million lb (1.20
million kg) for 2010, and 2.67 million lb
(1.21 million kg) for 2011 and
subsequent fishing years. The
recreational target catch levels for gag,
in gutted weight, are 2.06 million lb
(0.93 million kg) for 2009, 2.14 million
lb (0.97 million kg) for 2010, and 2.20
million lb (1.00 million kg) for 2011 and
subsequent fishing years. Recreational
landings will be evaluated relative to
the applicable ACL as follows. For 2009,
only 2009 recreational landings will be
compared to the ACL; in 2010, the
average of 2009 and 2010 recreational
landings will be compared to the ACL;
and in 2011 and subsequent fishing
years, the 3-year running average
recreational landings will be compared
to the ACL.
(5) Red grouper—(i) Commercial
fishery. If red grouper commercial
landings, as estimated by the SRD, reach
or are projected to reach the applicable
quota specified in § 622.42(a)(1)(iii)(C),
the AA will file a notification with the
Office of the Federal Register to close
the SWG commercial fishery for the
remainder of the fishing year. In
addition, if despite such closure, red
grouper commercial landings exceed the
ACL, 5.87 million lb (2.66 million kg)
gutted weight, the AA will file a
notification with the Office of the
Federal Register, at or near the
beginning of the following fishing year,
to maintain the red grouper commercial
quota for that following year at the level
of the prior year’s quota.
(ii) Recreational fishery. If red grouper
recreational landings, as estimated by
the SRD, exceed the applicable ACL
specified in this paragraph (a)(5)(ii), the
AA will file a notification with the
Office of the Federal Register, at or near
the beginning of the following fishing
year, to maintain the red grouper target
catch level for that following year at the
level of the prior year’s target catch. In
addition, the notification will reduce
the length of the recreational SWG
fishing season the following fishing year
by the amount necessary to ensure red
grouper recreational landings do not
exceed the recreational target catch level
the following fishing year. The
recreational ACL for red grouper, in
gutted weight, is 1.85 million lb (0.84
million kg). The recreational target catch
level for red grouper, in gutted weight,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:36 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
is 1.82 million lb (0.82 million kg).
Recreational landings will be evaluated
relative to the applicable ACL as
follows. For 2009, only 2009
recreational landings will be compared
to the ACL; in 2010, the average of 2009
and 2010 recreational landings will be
compared to the ACL; and in 2011 and
subsequent fishing years, the 3-year
running average recreational landings
will be compared to the ACL.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–27335 Filed 11–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 080404529–81431–01]
RIN 0648–AW61
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Atlantic Swordfish Quotas
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
adjust the North and South Atlantic
swordfish quotas for the 2008 fishing
year (January 1, 2008, through December
31, 2008) to account for underharvests,
and to transfer 18.8 metric tons (mt)
dressed weight (dw) to Canada per the
2006 International Commission for the
Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
recommendations 06–02 and 06–03. The
North Atlantic 2008 directed baseline
quotas plus the 2007 underharvest
would be divided equally between the
semiannual periods of January through
May and June through December. In
addition, NMFS proposes to modify the
vessel chartering regulations to
potentially allow Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species (HMS) limited access
permit (LAP) holders to charter foreign
vessels under a chartering arrangement
where catches taken would count
against U.S. Atlantic HMS quotas or
entitlements.
Comments on this proposed rule
may be submitted at the public hearing
(oral or written), or must be received via
mail, or fax by December 18, 2008.
The public hearing dates and times
are:
1. Monday, December 8, 4–6 p.m.,
Silver Spring, MD.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Tuesday, December 16, 2:30–4:30
p.m., Gloucester, MA.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by [0648–AW61], by any one
of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov
• Fax: 301–713–1917, Attn: LeAnn
Southward Hogan
• Mail: 1315 East–West Highway,
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All Personal Identifying Information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit Confidential Business
Information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the supporting documents
including the 2007 Environmental
Assessment (EA), Regulatory Impact
Review (RIR), Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), and the
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory
Species (HMS) Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) are available from the HMS
website at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
sfa/hms/ or by contacting LeAnn
Southward Hogan (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
The public hearing locations are:
1. Silver Spring – National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, SSMC
III, room 1311B, 1301 East–West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910; and
2. Gloucester – National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, National
Marine Fisheries Service Northeast
Regional Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
LeAnn Southward Hogan or Karyl
Brewster–Geisz by phone: 301–713–
2347 or by fax: 301–713–1917.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Atlantic swordfish fishery is managed
under the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP.
Implementing regulations at 50 CFR part
635 are issued under the authority of the
Magnuson–Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson–Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq., and the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act (ATCA), 16 U.S.C. 971
et seq. Regulations issued under the
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
authority of ATCA carry out the
recommendations of ICCAT.
1. Swordfish Quota
a. North Atlantic
ICCAT recommendation 06–02
established the current north Atlantic
swordfish total allowable catch (TAC) of
14,000 metric tons (mt) whole weight
(ww), through 2008. Of the 14,000 mt
ww, the United States is allocated 3,907
mt ww (2,937.6 mt dw). This allocation
is the same the United States received
during 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
ICCAT recommendation 06–02 also
limits the amount of North Atlantic
swordfish underharvest that can be
carried forward by all Contracting
Parties, non–Contracting Cooperating
Parties, Entities and Fishing Entities
(CPCs) to 50 percent of the baseline
quota allocation for 2007 and 2008.
Therefore, the United States could
carryover a maximum of 1,468.8 mt dw
of underharvests from the previous year
to be added to the baseline quota.
This proposed rule would adjust the
total available quota for the 2008 fishing
year to account for the 2007
underharvests. The 2008 North Atlantic
swordfish baseline quota is 2,937.6 mt
dw. The total North Atlantic swordfish
underharvest for 2007 was 3,220 mt dw,
which exceeds the maximum carryover
cap of 1,468.8 mt dw. Therefore, NMFS
is carrying forward the capped amount
per the ICCAT recommendation. Thus,
the baseline quota plus the underharvest
carryover maximum of 1,468.8 mt dw
equals an adjusted quota of 4,406.4 mt
dw for the 2008 fishing year. The
directed category would be allocated
3,601.9 mt dw that would be split into
two seasons in 2008. The incidental
category would be allocated 300 mt dw,
and the reserve category would be
reduced from a quota of 504.5 mt dw to
485.7 due to the transfer of 18.8 mt dw
to Canada (Table 1).
b. South Atlantic
ICCAT recommendation 06–03
established the South Atlantic
swordfish TAC at 17,000 mt ww for
2007, 2008, and 2009. This TAC is
slightly higher than that of previous
years of 15,631 mt ww in 2003, 15,776
mt ww in 2004, 15,956 mt ww in 2005,
and 16,055 mt ww in 2006. Of the
17,000 mt ww TAC, the United States is
allocated 100 mt ww (75.2 mt dw). As
with the North Atlantic swordfish
recommendation, ICCAT
recommendation 06–03 establishes a
cap on the amount of underharvest that
can be carried forward during the
defined management period (2007–
2009). For South Atlantic swordfish, the
United States is limited to carrying
forward 100 mt ww (75.2 mt dw). The
2008 South Atlantic swordfish baseline
quota is 75.2 mt dw. The total South
Atlantic swordfish underharvest for
2007 was 150.4 mt dw, which exceeds
the maximum carryover cap of 75.2 mt
dw. Therefore, NMFS is carrying
forward the capped amount per ICCAT
recommendation 06–03. As a result, the
68399
baseline quota plus the underharvest
carryover maximum of 75.2 mt dw
equals an adjusted quota of 150.4 mt dw
for the 2008 fishing year (Table 1).
c. Impacts
In recent years, the PLL fleet has not
caught its entire swordfish quota, and as
a result, underharvest carryovers have
grown significantly from year to year
(3,528.8 mt dw, 4,806.1 mt dw, and
6,905.9 mt dw for 2004–2006,
respectively). The proposed adjusted
quota for the North and South Atlantic
swordfish, after accounting for the 2007
underharvests and annual transfer to
Canada, would be the same in 2008 as
the 2007 adjusted quota specifically
examined in the Environmental
Assessment (EA) that was prepared for
the 2007 Swordfish Quota Specification
Final Rule published on October 5, 2007
(72 FR 56929). The quota adjustments
would not increase overall quotas and is
not expected to increase fishing effort or
protected species interactions beyond
those considered in the EA mentioned
above. Therefore, because there would
be no changes to the swordfish
management measures in this proposed
rule, or the affected environment or any
environmental consequences that have
not been previously analyzed, NMFS
has determined that the proposed rule
and impacts to the human environment
as a result of the quota adjustments are
not significant and would not require
additional NEPA analysis.
TABLE 1—LANDINGS AND QUOTAS FOR THE ATLANTIC SWORDFISH FISHERIES (2005 – 2008) APPLYING THE PREFERRED
ALTERNATIVES
North Atlantic Swordfish Quota (mt dw)
2005
2006
2007 preliminary
2008 to date
Baseline Quota
2,937.6
2,937.6
2,937.6
2,937.6
Quota Carried Over
3,359.1
4,691.2
1,468.8
1,468.8
Adjusted quota
6,296.7
7,628.8
4,406.4
4,406.4
5,895.2
7,246.1
3,601.9
3,601.9
Incidental Category
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
Reserve Category
101.5
82.7
504.5
485.7
1,471.8
1,291.5
1,167.5
962.7 to date
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
4,806.1
6,318.5
3,220.1
TBD
114.9
154.9
149.2
TBD
4,691.2
1,468.8
1,468.8
TBD
2005
2006
2007 preliminary
2008 to date
Quota Allocation
Utilized Quota
Directed Category
Landings
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Reserve Transfer to
Canada
Total Underharvest
Dead Discards
Carryover Available+
South Atlantic Swordfish Quota (mt dw)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:36 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
68400
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—LANDINGS AND QUOTAS FOR THE ATLANTIC SWORDFISH FISHERIES (2005 – 2008) APPLYING THE PREFERRED
ALTERNATIVES—Continued
Baseline Quota
75.2
90.2
75.2
75.2
Quota Carried Over
319.3
394.5
75.2
75.2
Adjusted quota
394.5
484.7
150.4
150.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 to date
394.5
75.2
75.2
75.2
Landings
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Carryover Available+
2. Vessel Chartering
This proposed rule would also modify
regulations regarding vessel chartering.
At its 2002 annual meeting, ICCAT
adopted a chartering recommendation
(ICCAT Recommendation 02–21)
allowing Contracting Parties to the
ICCAT Convention to charter fishing
vessels registered to responsible CPCs
that explicitly agree to apply ICCAT
conservation and management measures
and enforce them on their vessels.
Under such chartering arrangements,
the chartered fishing vessels do not
change their flag, but catches taken
under the arrangement count against the
quota or fishing possibilities of the
chartering ICCAT Contracting Party.
Pursuant to this recommendation,
NMFS implemented regulations on
December 6, 2004 (69 FR 70396). These
regulations took a limited approach to
chartering by allowing entities from
ICCAT Contracting Parties to charter
U.S. fishing vessels but not allowing
U.S. entities to charter foreign vessels in
the same way. Current regulations allow
chartering arrangements between U.S.
fishing vessel owners and foreign
entities under which a U.S. fishing
vessel can fish in waters beyond
national jurisdiction without reflagging
the vessel, and the U.S. fishing vessel’s
catch counts against the ICCAT quota of
the Contracting Party of the chartering
foreign entity. These regulations require
the owner of a U.S. fishing vessel to
apply for and obtain a chartering permit
from NMFS before fishing under such a
chartering arrangement. In addition,
under these regulations, U.S. fishing
vessels owners issued a chartering
permit may not fish against U.S.
Atlantic HMS quota or entitlements
until the chartering permit expires or is
terminated.
When NMFS developed and
implemented the current chartering
regulations, interest was expressed in
allowing U.S. fishing vessels to be
chartered by foreign entities of an
ICCAT Contracting Party and to allow
the catch taken to count against the
ICCAT Contracting Party’s quota.
However, due to legal and policy
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:36 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
concerns related to foreign vessels and
foreign fishing in the U.S. exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) and little public
interest in chartering arrangements
where a foreign vessel’s catch would
count against U.S. Atlantic HMS quotas
or entitlements, NMFS did not
implement regulations that would allow
U.S. entities to charter foreign vessels to
catch ICCAT–managed species that
would count against U.S. quotas.
Since implementing the chartering
regulations, there has been increased
public interest in allowing U.S. entities
to charter foreign vessels of ICCAT CPCs
where the catch taken would count
against the Atlantic HMS quotas or
entitlements of the United States,
possibly as a step toward revitalizing
certain HMS fisheries. This type of
chartering arrangement could also help
utilize Atlantic HMS quotas and
facilitate flexibility within the vessel
chartering program, which would in
turn enhance quota management within
the Atlantic HMS fisheries. Thus, NMFS
is proposing changes to the current
chartering regulations that would allow
U.S. chartering of foreign vessels of
ICCAT CPCs to fish on the high seas
against U.S. Atlantic HMS quota or
entitlements.
The proposed chartering regulations
would establish a process and criteria
for NMFS’s evaluation of proposed
chartering arrangements and certain
limitations on such chartering
arrangements. Under the proposed
regulations, only Atlantic HMS LAP
holders would be allowed to enter these
types of chartering arrangements with
foreign entities of ICCAT CPCs. NMFS
is proposing to limit these chartering
arrangements to Atlantic HMS LAP
holders, who are allowed to harvest
Atlantic HMS from the U.S. EEZ and on
the high seas. As noted earlier, with
regard to U.S. chartering of foreign
vessels, this proposed rule would only
allow such activities on the high seas.
Under the rule as proposed, only those
Atlantic HMS LAP holders who are
currently authorized to harvest HMS on
the high seas would be chartering
vessels to, essentially, exercise that
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
harvesting privilege on their behalf.
This approach should, generally, keep
any resulting chartering arrangements
within the scope of existing analyzed
effects of utilizing Atlantic HMS quotas
on the high seas. For the duration of the
chartering arrangement, the Atlantic
HMS LAP holder would not be
permitted to fish under U.S. Atlantic
HMS quotas or otherwise utilize the
LAPs themselves. In addition, under the
proposed regulations, foreign vessel
owners who enter into a chartering
arrangement with an Atlantic HMS LAP
holder would be required to follow all
U.S. regulations that would have
otherwise applied to the Atlantic HMS
LAP holder. Lastly, the proposed
regulations would establish data
reporting requirements consistent with
the ICCAT recommendation.
Since implementing the chartering
regulations in 2004, NMFS has only
received three requests for chartering
permits, only one of which was issued.
NMFS has not received a specific
chartering request in 2008. Upon receipt
of any such request, NMFS would
conduct the necessary ecological,
economic, and social analysis, including
any necessary NEPA analysis, to
consider the impacts of the specific
chartering request on the HMS fishery
and its participants. NMFS does not
expect this regulatory modification to
result in many additional requests, and
NMFS does not expect these potential
chartering arrangements to increase
fishing mortality or increase fishing
effort significantly.
For the chartering portion of this
proposed rule, NMFS has determined
that the proposed regulatory
modification is administrative in nature
and is consistent with the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its related
Environmental Impact Statement and
the ICCAT Chartering Recommendation.
As defined in Sections 5.05 and Section
6.03c.3(i) of NAO 216–6, the proposed
action is an amendment of existing
chartering regulations that are
administrative and technical in nature
that would not have significant
environmental impacts and for which
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
any cumulative effects are negligible. As
such, it is categorically excluded from
the need to prepare an Environmental
Assessment.
3. Request for Comments
Comments on this proposed rule may
be submitted at public hearings (see
DATES and ADDRESSES), or via mail, or
fax by December 18, 2008. NMFS will
hold two public hearings to receive
comments from fishery participants and
other members of the public regarding
this proposed rule. These hearings will
be physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Requests for sign language
interpretation or other auxiliary aids
should be directed to LeAnn Southward
Hogan at (301) 713–2347 at least 5 days
prior to the hearing date.
The public is reminded that NMFS
expects participants at the public
hearings to conduct themselves
appropriately. At the beginning of each
meeting, a representative of NMFS will
explain the ground rules (e.g., alcohol is
prohibited from the hearing room;
attendees will be called to give their
comments in the order in which they
register to speak; the attendees should
not interrupt one another). The NMFS
representative will attempt to structure
the meeting so that all attending
member of the public will be able to
comment, if they so choose, regardless
of the controversial nature of the
subject(s). Attendees are expected to
respect the ground rules, and, if they do
not, they will be asked to leave the
meeting. For individuals unable to
attend a hearing, NMFS also solicits
written comments on this proposed rule
(see DATES and ADDRESSES).
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
4. Classification
The Acting Assistant Administrator
has determined that this proposed rule
is consistent with the Consolidated
HMS FMP, the Magnuson–Stevens Act,
ATCA, and other applicable law, subject
to further consideration after public
comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The certification reads:
Swordfish Quotas
The final 2007 and 2008 North and South
Atlantic swordfish baseline quotas were
published in the Federal Register on October
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:36 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
5, 2007 (72 FR 56929). This proposed rule
would adjust the 2008 baseline quotas for the
North and South Atlantic swordfish fisheries
for the 2008 fishing year (January 1, 2008,
through December 31, 2008) to account for
2007 underharvests per 50 part 635.27(c) and
transfer 18.8 metric tons (mt) dressed weight
(dw) to Canada from the reserve category.
Consistent with Federal regulations (50 CFR
part 635.27(c)(1)), the 2008 North Atlantic
swordfish directed baseline quotas plus the
2007 underharvests would be divided
equally between the semiannual periods of
January through May and June through
December, 2008. The 2007 total underharvest
for North Atlantic swordfish was 3,220.1 mt
dw and 150.4 mt dw for South Atlantic
swordfish. However, since the underharvest
carryover amount has been capped (for the
North Atlantic swordfish at 1468.8 mt dw,
and 75.2 mt dw for South Atlantic
swordfish), the proposed 2008 adjusted
quotas for the North and South Atlantic
swordfish would be 4,406.4 mt dw and 150.4
mt dw, respectively. These 2008 adjusted
quotas are the same as the adjusted quotas for
the 2007 fishing year which were analyzed in
the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA)
prepared for the 2007 Swordfish
Specifications Final Rule published on
October 5, 2007 (FR 72 56929).
The commercial swordfish fishery is
comprised of fishermen who hold a
swordfish directed, incidental, or handgear
limited access permits (LAP) and the related
industries including processors, bait houses,
and equipment suppliers, all of which NMFS
considers to be small entities according to the
size standards set by the Small Business
Administration. As of May 2007, there were
approximately 180 fishermen with a directed
swordfish LAP, 78 fishermen with an
incidental swordfish (LAP), and 88 fishermen
with a handgear (LAP) for swordfish. Based
on the 2006 swordfish ex–vessel price per
pound of $3.58, the 2008 North Atlantic
swordfish baseline quota could result in
revenues of $23,184, 913 (6,476,232 lbs dw
* $3.58) and $593,513 (165,785 lbs dw *
3.58) for South Atlantic quota if the quota
was fully utilized. As proposed in this action,
the 2008 baseline quotas would be adjusted
to account for the 2007 underharvest which
could result in additional revenues for the
North and South Atlantic swordfish fisheries
of $34,777,370 and $1,187,027, respectively,
for fully utilized quotas. Potential revenues
on a per vessel basis, considering a total of
346 swordfish permit holders, could be
$100,512 for the North Atlantic swordfish
fishery and $3,431 for the South Atlantic
swordfish fishery. However, in both the
North and South Atlantic swordfish fisheries,
the pelagic longline fleet has not caught the
entire U.S. swordfish quota for many years.
For example, the total 2007 North Atlantic
swordfish landings were 1,167.5 mt dw and
the current 2008 landings for North Atlantic
swordfish, as of April 30, 2008, are 443.3 mt
dw. Therefore, because the United States is
not expected to catch its entire quota, and the
quotas adjustments are the same in 2008 as
in 2007, NMFS does not expect these quota
adjustments to have a significant economic
impact on a large number of small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68401
Chartering Regulations
This proposed rule would also modify
regulations regarding vessel chartering. At its
2002 annual meeting, ICCAT adopted a
chartering recommendation (ICCAT
Recommendation 02–21) allowing
Contracting Parties to the ICCAT Convention
to charter fishing vessels registered to
responsible Contracting Parties, Cooperating
non–Contracting Parties, Entities or Fishing
Entities (CPCs) that explicitly agree to apply
ICCAT conservation and management
measures and enforce them on their vessels.
Pursuant to this recommendation, NMFS
implemented regulations on December 6,
2004 (69 FR 70396). These regulations took
a limited approach to chartering by allowing
entities from ICCAT Contracting Parties to
charter U.S. fishing vessels but not allowing
U.S. entities to charter foreign vessels in the
same way. Current regulations allow
chartering arrangements between U.S. fishing
vessel owners and foreign entities under
which a U.S. fishing vessel can fish in waters
beyond national jurisdiction without
reflagging the vessel, and the U.S. fishing
vessel’s catch counts against the ICCAT quota
of the Contracting Party of the chartering
foreign entity. These regulations require the
owner of a U.S. fishing vessel to apply for
and obtain a chartering permit from NMFS
before fishing under such a chartering
arrangement.
When NMFS developed and implemented
the current chartering regulations, interest
was expressed in allowing U.S. fishing
vessels to be chartered by foreign entities of
an ICCAT Contracting Party and to allow the
catch taken to count against the ICCAT
Contracting Party’s quota. However, due to
legal and policy concerns related to foreign
vessels and foreign fishing in the U.S.
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and little
public interest in chartering arrangements
where a foreign vessel’s catch would count
against U.S. Atlantic HMS quotas or
entitlements, NMFS did not implement
regulations that would allow U.S. entities to
charter foreign vessels to catch ICCAT–
managed species that would count against
U.S. quotas or entitlements.
Since implementing the chartering
regulations, there has been increased public
interest in allowing U.S. entities to charter
foreign vessels of ICCAT CPCs where the
catch taken would count against the U.S.
Atlantic HMS quotas or entitlements,
possibly as a step toward revitalizing certain
HMS fisheries. This type of chartering
arrangement could also help utilize Atlantic
HMS quotas and facilitate flexibility within
the vessel chartering program, which would
in turn enhance quota management within
the Atlantic HMS fisheries. Thus, NMFS is
proposing changes to the current chartering
regulations that would allow chartering of
foreign vessels of ICCAT CPCs to fish on the
high seas against U.S. Atlantic HMS quota or
entitlements.
The proposed chartering regulations would
establish a process and criteria for NMFS’s
evaluation of proposed chartering
arrangements and certain limitations on such
chartering arrangements. Under the proposed
regulations, only Atlantic HMS LAP holders
would be allowed to enter these types of
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
68402
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
chartering arrangements with foreign entities
of ICCAT CPCs. NMFS is proposing to limit
these chartering arrangements to Atlantic
HMS LAP holders because, by having been
issued an Atlantic HMS LAP, these permitees
are allowed to harvest Atlantic HMS from the
U.S. EEZ and on the high seas. Under the
rule as proposed, only those Atlantic HMS
LAP holders who currently are authorized to
harvest HMS on the high seas would be
chartering vessels to, essentially, exercise
that harvesting privilege on their behalf. This
approach should, generally, keep any
resulting chartering arrangements within the
scope of existing analyzed effects of utilizing
Atlantic HMS quotas on the high seas. During
the length of the chartering arrangement, the
Atlantic HMS LAP holder would not be
permitted to fish under Atlantic HMS quotas
or otherwise utilize the LAPs themselves. In
addition, under the proposed regulations,
foreign vessel owners who enter into a
chartering arrangement with an Atlantic
HMS LAP holder would be required to follow
all U.S. regulations that would have
otherwise applied to the Atlantic HMS LAP
holder.
Since implementing the chartering
regulations in 2004, NMFS has only received
three requests for chartering permits, only
one of which was issued. NMFS has not
received a specific chartering request in
2008. Upon receipt of any such request,
NMFS would conduct the necessary
ecological, economic, and social analysis,
including any necessary NEPA analysis, to
consider the impacts of the specific
chartering request on the HMS fishery and its
participants. NMFS does not expect this
regulatory modification to result in many
additional requests, and NMFS does not
expect these potential chartering
arrangements to increase fishing mortality or
increase fishing effort significantly. It is
unlikely that activities conducted by foreign
vessels under a chartering agreement would
result in any economic impacts on domestic
small businesses. Therefore, NMFS does not
expect this regulatory modification to result
in significant impacts on a substantial
number of small entities.
Conclusion
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
This proposed rule would not result in any
increase in fishing mortality, change basic
fishing practices, or pose any significant
impacts to the human environment.
Therefore, NMFS does not expect the minor
regulatory modifications to the vessel
chartering regulations or the carryover of
underharvests to have significant economic
impacts on small entities.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Management,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Treaties.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:36 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
Dated: November 12, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 635 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 635––ATLANTIC HIGHLY
MIGRATORY SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 635
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
2. In § 635.5, paragraph (a)(5) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 635.5
Recordkeeping and reporting.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(5) Chartering arrangements. (i)
Where a U.S. vessel is chartered by a
foreign entity (e.g., government,
company, person) of an ICCAT
Contracting Party.
(A) For the purposes of paragraph
(a)(5)(i) of this section, a chartering
arrangement means any contract,
agreement, or commitment between a
U.S. fishing vessel owner and a foreign
entity of an ICCAT Contracting Party by
which the control, use, possession, or
services of a U.S. fishing vessel are
secured, for a period of time for fishing
targeting Atlantic HMS against the
ICCAT quota of the chartering foreign
entity’s Contracting Party. Chartering
arrangements under this part do not
include bareboat charters under which a
vessel enters into a fishing agreement
with a foreign entity, changes
registration to fish under another
country’s registration then, once the
agreed–upon fishing is completed,
reverts back to the vessel’s original
registration.
(B) If a foreign entity of an ICCAT
Contracting Party wants to enter into a
chartering arrangement with a U.S.
fishing vessel owner, the ICCAT
Contracting Party and the U.S vessel
owner must be in full compliance with
ICCAT conservation and management
measures.
(C) Before fishing under a chartering
arrangement under paragraph (a)(5)(i) of
this section, the owner of a U.S. fishing
vessel must apply for, and obtain, a
chartering permit as specified in
§ 635.32(e). If a chartering permit is
obtained, the U.S. fishing vessel owner
must submit catch information as
specified in the terms and conditions of
that permit. All catches will be recorded
and counted against the applicable
ICCAT quota of the chartering foreign
entity’s Contracting Party and, unless
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
otherwise provided in the chartering
permit, must be offloaded in the ports
of the chartering foreign entity’s ICCAT
Contracting Party or offloaded under the
direct supervision of the chartering
foreign entity’s ICCAT Contracting
Party.
(D) If the chartering arrangement
terminates before the expiration of the
chartering permit, the U.S. fishing
vessel owner must notify NMFS
immediately and in writing. Such
notification requirements shall also
apply to situations where the chartering
arrangement is temporarily suspended
and during intermittent periods where
the vessel may be fishing under Atlantic
HMS quotas.
(ii) Where a foreign vessel is chartered
by an Atlantic HMS LAP holder.
(A) For the purposes of paragraph
(a)(5)(ii) of this section, a chartering
arrangement means any contract,
agreement, or commitment between an
Atlantic HMS LAP holder and a foreign
vessel owner of an ICCAT CPC by which
the control, use, possession, or services
of a foreign vessel are secured, for a
period of time for fishing targeting
Atlantic HMS on the high seas against
the Atlantic HMS quota or entitlements
of the United States. Atlantic HMS LAP
holders shall not fish using their LAP
permit(s) during the duration of the
chartering arrangement.
(B) NMFS will consider on a case–by–
case basis and must approve in writing,
any proposed chartering arrangement
under paragraph (a)(5)(ii) of this section.
Both the ICCAT CPC and a foreign
vessel owner of an ICCAT CPC wishing
to enter into a chartering arrangement
with an Atlantic HMS LAP holder must
be in full compliance with ICCAT
conservation and management
measures. Vessels on the ICCAT IUU
vessel list may not be chartered.
(C) Atlantic HMS LAP holders who
are interested in chartering foreign
vessels of an ICCAT CPC under a
chartering arrangement should include
the following information in their
request to NMFS:
(1) Information regarding the
proposed chartering operation,
including the ICCAT CPC’s vessel name,
vessel registration, and flag of the
vessel;
(2) A copy of the proposed chartering
arrangement between the Atlantic HMS
LAP holder and the ICCAT CPC’s vessel
owner;
(3) The species to be fished, amount
of fishing expected, and gear types to be
used;
(4) The general geographic areas to be
fished;
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 18, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(5) A letter of consent from the
government of the ICCAT CPC vessel’s
flag state;
(6) The timeframe of the chartering
arrangement; and
(7) Anticipated benefits to the United
States, including, but not limited to, the
use of U.S. processing facilities/
personnel, and specific positive effects
on U.S. employment.
(D) After reviewing the information
submitted, NMFS will evaluate whether
the proposed chartering arrangement
provides adequate benefit to the United
States and will consider the
implications of the arrangement for
Atlantic HMS quota management.
Atlantic HMS LAP holders who submit
chartering arrangement requests to
NMFS will be contacted if the
chartering arrangement is authorized
and will be notified of the requirements
and terms of approval, including data
submission requirements. NMFS may
decide to deny a chartering arrangement
request.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 635.32, paragraphs (e) (1)
through (4) and (e)(6) are revised to read
as follows:
§ 635.32
Specifically authorized activities.
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) For activities consistent with the
purposes of this section, § 635.5(a)(5)(i),
and § 600.745(b)(1) of this chapter,
NMFS may issue chartering permits to
a U.S. fishing vessel owner. An
application for a chartering permit must
include all information required under
§ 600.745(b)(2) of this chapter and, in
addition, written notification of: the
species of fish covered by the chartering
arrangement and quota allocated to the
chartering foreign entity’s ICCAT
Contracting Party; duration of the
arrangement; measures adopted by the
chartering foreign entity’s ICCAT
Contracting Party to implement ICCAT
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:36 Nov 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
chartering provisions; copies of fishing
licenses, permits, and/or other
authorizations issued by the chartering
foreign entity for the U.S. fishing vessel
to fish under the arrangement; a copy of
the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act
Permit pursuant to § 300.10 of this title;
documentation regarding interactions
with protected resources; and
documentation regarding the legal
establishment of the chartering entity.
To be considered complete, an
application for a chartering permit from
a U.S. fishing vessel owner must
include all information specified in
§ 600.745(b)(2) of this chapter and in
this paragraph (e).
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of
§ 600.745 of this chapter and other
provisions of this part, a valid
chartering permit is required to fish for,
take, retain, or possess ICCAT–
regulated species under chartering
arrangements as specified in
§ 635.5(a)(5)(i). A valid chartering
permit must be on board the U.S. fishing
vessel, must be available when ICCAT–
regulated species are landed, and must
be presented for inspection upon
request of an authorized officer. A
chartering permit is valid for the
duration of the chartering arrangement
or until the expiration date specified on
the permit, whichever comes first. U.S.
fishing vessel owners issued a
chartering permit shall not be
authorized to fish under applicable U.S.
Atlantic HMS quotas or entitlements
until the chartering permit expires or is
terminated.
(3) Chartering permit holders must
submit logbooks and comply with
reporting requirements as specified in
§ 635.5. NMFS will provide specific
conditions and requirements in the
chartering permit, so as to ensure
consistency, to the extent possible, with
laws of the ICCAT Contracting Party, the
Consolidated HMS FMP, as well as
ICCAT recommendations.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68403
(4) Observers may be placed on board
U.S. fishing vessels issued chartering
permits as specified under § 635.7.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) A U.S. fishing vessel shall be
authorized to fish under only one
chartering arrangement at a time.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 635.71:
A. Paragraphs (a)(42), (43), and (44)
are revised.
B. Paragraphs (a)(45) through (a)(53)
are redesignated as paragraphs (a)(46)
through (a)(54), respectively.
C. A new paragraph (a)(45) is added.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
§ 635.71
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(42) Count chartering arrangement
catches against quotas other than those
defined in § 635.5(a)(5).
(43) Fail to submit catch information
regarding fishing activities conducted
under a chartering arrangement with a
foreign vessel owner, as specified in
§ 635.5(a)(5).
(44) Offload catch taken under a
chartering arrangement in ports other
than the ports of the chartering foreign
entity’s ICCAT Contracting Party or
offload catch without the direct
supervision of the chartering foreign
entity’s ICCAT Contracting Party as
specified § 635.5(a)(5).
(45) Fish for, take, retain, or possess
ICCAT–regulated species under a
chartering arrangement as specified in
§ 635.5(a)(5)(i) without a valid
chartering permit on board the vessel
and available upon the request of an
authorized officer.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E8–27337 Filed 11–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\18NOP1.SGM
18NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 18, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68398-68403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27337]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 080404529-81431-01]
RIN 0648-AW61
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Atlantic Swordfish Quotas
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would adjust the North and South Atlantic
swordfish quotas for the 2008 fishing year (January 1, 2008, through
December 31, 2008) to account for underharvests, and to transfer 18.8
metric tons (mt) dressed weight (dw) to Canada per the 2006
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)
recommendations 06-02 and 06-03. The North Atlantic 2008 directed
baseline quotas plus the 2007 underharvest would be divided equally
between the semiannual periods of January through May and June through
December. In addition, NMFS proposes to modify the vessel chartering
regulations to potentially allow Atlantic Highly Migratory Species
(HMS) limited access permit (LAP) holders to charter foreign vessels
under a chartering arrangement where catches taken would count against
U.S. Atlantic HMS quotas or entitlements.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule may be submitted at the public
hearing (oral or written), or must be received via mail, or fax by
December 18, 2008.
The public hearing dates and times are:
1. Monday, December 8, 4-6 p.m., Silver Spring, MD.
2. Tuesday, December 16, 2:30-4:30 p.m., Gloucester, MA.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by [0648-AW61], by any
one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal https://www.regulations.gov
Fax: 301-713-1917, Attn: LeAnn Southward Hogan
Mail: 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Instructions: All comments received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain anonymous). You may submit attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Copies of the supporting documents including the 2007 Environmental
Assessment (EA), Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA), and the Consolidated Atlantic Highly
Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP) are available
from the HMS website at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/ or by
contacting LeAnn Southward Hogan (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
The public hearing locations are:
1. Silver Spring - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
SSMC III, room 1311B, 1301 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910;
and
2. Gloucester - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LeAnn Southward Hogan or Karyl
Brewster-Geisz by phone: 301-713-2347 or by fax: 301-713-1917.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Atlantic swordfish fishery is
managed under the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP. Implementing regulations
at 50 CFR part 635 are issued under the authority of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act),
16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA),
16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. Regulations issued under the
[[Page 68399]]
authority of ATCA carry out the recommendations of ICCAT.
1. Swordfish Quota
a. North Atlantic
ICCAT recommendation 06-02 established the current north Atlantic
swordfish total allowable catch (TAC) of 14,000 metric tons (mt) whole
weight (ww), through 2008. Of the 14,000 mt ww, the United States is
allocated 3,907 mt ww (2,937.6 mt dw). This allocation is the same the
United States received during 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. ICCAT
recommendation 06-02 also limits the amount of North Atlantic swordfish
underharvest that can be carried forward by all Contracting Parties,
non-Contracting Cooperating Parties, Entities and Fishing Entities
(CPCs) to 50 percent of the baseline quota allocation for 2007 and
2008. Therefore, the United States could carryover a maximum of 1,468.8
mt dw of underharvests from the previous year to be added to the
baseline quota.
This proposed rule would adjust the total available quota for the
2008 fishing year to account for the 2007 underharvests. The 2008 North
Atlantic swordfish baseline quota is 2,937.6 mt dw. The total North
Atlantic swordfish underharvest for 2007 was 3,220 mt dw, which exceeds
the maximum carryover cap of 1,468.8 mt dw. Therefore, NMFS is carrying
forward the capped amount per the ICCAT recommendation. Thus, the
baseline quota plus the underharvest carryover maximum of 1,468.8 mt dw
equals an adjusted quota of 4,406.4 mt dw for the 2008 fishing year.
The directed category would be allocated 3,601.9 mt dw that would be
split into two seasons in 2008. The incidental category would be
allocated 300 mt dw, and the reserve category would be reduced from a
quota of 504.5 mt dw to 485.7 due to the transfer of 18.8 mt dw to
Canada (Table 1).
b. South Atlantic
ICCAT recommendation 06-03 established the South Atlantic swordfish
TAC at 17,000 mt ww for 2007, 2008, and 2009. This TAC is slightly
higher than that of previous years of 15,631 mt ww in 2003, 15,776 mt
ww in 2004, 15,956 mt ww in 2005, and 16,055 mt ww in 2006. Of the
17,000 mt ww TAC, the United States is allocated 100 mt ww (75.2 mt
dw). As with the North Atlantic swordfish recommendation, ICCAT
recommendation 06-03 establishes a cap on the amount of underharvest
that can be carried forward during the defined management period (2007-
2009). For South Atlantic swordfish, the United States is limited to
carrying forward 100 mt ww (75.2 mt dw). The 2008 South Atlantic
swordfish baseline quota is 75.2 mt dw. The total South Atlantic
swordfish underharvest for 2007 was 150.4 mt dw, which exceeds the
maximum carryover cap of 75.2 mt dw. Therefore, NMFS is carrying
forward the capped amount per ICCAT recommendation 06-03. As a result,
the baseline quota plus the underharvest carryover maximum of 75.2 mt
dw equals an adjusted quota of 150.4 mt dw for the 2008 fishing year
(Table 1).
c. Impacts
In recent years, the PLL fleet has not caught its entire swordfish
quota, and as a result, underharvest carryovers have grown
significantly from year to year (3,528.8 mt dw, 4,806.1 mt dw, and
6,905.9 mt dw for 2004-2006, respectively). The proposed adjusted quota
for the North and South Atlantic swordfish, after accounting for the
2007 underharvests and annual transfer to Canada, would be the same in
2008 as the 2007 adjusted quota specifically examined in the
Environmental Assessment (EA) that was prepared for the 2007 Swordfish
Quota Specification Final Rule published on October 5, 2007 (72 FR
56929). The quota adjustments would not increase overall quotas and is
not expected to increase fishing effort or protected species
interactions beyond those considered in the EA mentioned above.
Therefore, because there would be no changes to the swordfish
management measures in this proposed rule, or the affected environment
or any environmental consequences that have not been previously
analyzed, NMFS has determined that the proposed rule and impacts to the
human environment as a result of the quota adjustments are not
significant and would not require additional NEPA analysis.
Table 1--Landings and Quotas for the Atlantic Swordfish Fisheries (2005
2008) Applying the Preferred Alternatives
North Atlantic Swordfish Quota 2005 2006 2007 2008 to
(mt dw) prelimi date
nary
================================================================
Baseline Quota 2,937.6 2,937.6 2,937.6 2,937.6
================================================================
Quota Carried Over 3,359.1 4,691.2 1,468.8 1,468.8
================================================================
Adjusted quota 6,296.7 7,628.8 4,406.4 4,406.4
================================================================
Quota Allocation Directed 5,895.2 7,246.1 3,601.9 3,601.9
Category
----------------------------------------------------
Incidenta 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0
l
Category
----------------------------------------------------
Reserve 101.5 82.7 504.5 485.7
Category
========================================================================
Utilized Quota Landings 1,471.8 1,291.5 1,167.5 962.7 to
date
----------------------------------------------------
Reserve 18.8 18.8 18.8 18.8
Transfer
to
Canada
========================================================================
Total Underharvest 4,806.1 6,318.5 3,220.1 TBD
================================================================
Dead Discards 114.9 154.9 149.2 TBD
================================================================
Carryover Available+ 4,691.2 1,468.8 1,468.8 TBD
----------------------------------------------------------------
South Atlantic Swordfish Quota 2005 2006 2007 2008 to
(mt dw) prelimi date
nary
--------------------============================================
[[Page 68400]]
Baseline Quota 75.2 90.2 75.2 75.2
----------------------------------------------------------------
Quota Carried Over 319.3 394.5 75.2 75.2
----------------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted quota 394.5 484.7 150.4 150.4
----------------------------------------------------------------
Landings 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 to
date
================================================================
Carryover Available+ 394.5 75.2 75.2 75.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Vessel Chartering
This proposed rule would also modify regulations regarding vessel
chartering. At its 2002 annual meeting, ICCAT adopted a chartering
recommendation (ICCAT Recommendation 02-21) allowing Contracting
Parties to the ICCAT Convention to charter fishing vessels registered
to responsible CPCs that explicitly agree to apply ICCAT conservation
and management measures and enforce them on their vessels. Under such
chartering arrangements, the chartered fishing vessels do not change
their flag, but catches taken under the arrangement count against the
quota or fishing possibilities of the chartering ICCAT Contracting
Party.
Pursuant to this recommendation, NMFS implemented regulations on
December 6, 2004 (69 FR 70396). These regulations took a limited
approach to chartering by allowing entities from ICCAT Contracting
Parties to charter U.S. fishing vessels but not allowing U.S. entities
to charter foreign vessels in the same way. Current regulations allow
chartering arrangements between U.S. fishing vessel owners and foreign
entities under which a U.S. fishing vessel can fish in waters beyond
national jurisdiction without reflagging the vessel, and the U.S.
fishing vessel's catch counts against the ICCAT quota of the
Contracting Party of the chartering foreign entity. These regulations
require the owner of a U.S. fishing vessel to apply for and obtain a
chartering permit from NMFS before fishing under such a chartering
arrangement. In addition, under these regulations, U.S. fishing vessels
owners issued a chartering permit may not fish against U.S. Atlantic
HMS quota or entitlements until the chartering permit expires or is
terminated.
When NMFS developed and implemented the current chartering
regulations, interest was expressed in allowing U.S. fishing vessels to
be chartered by foreign entities of an ICCAT Contracting Party and to
allow the catch taken to count against the ICCAT Contracting Party's
quota. However, due to legal and policy concerns related to foreign
vessels and foreign fishing in the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
and little public interest in chartering arrangements where a foreign
vessel's catch would count against U.S. Atlantic HMS quotas or
entitlements, NMFS did not implement regulations that would allow U.S.
entities to charter foreign vessels to catch ICCAT-managed species that
would count against U.S. quotas.
Since implementing the chartering regulations, there has been
increased public interest in allowing U.S. entities to charter foreign
vessels of ICCAT CPCs where the catch taken would count against the
Atlantic HMS quotas or entitlements of the United States, possibly as a
step toward revitalizing certain HMS fisheries. This type of chartering
arrangement could also help utilize Atlantic HMS quotas and facilitate
flexibility within the vessel chartering program, which would in turn
enhance quota management within the Atlantic HMS fisheries. Thus, NMFS
is proposing changes to the current chartering regulations that would
allow U.S. chartering of foreign vessels of ICCAT CPCs to fish on the
high seas against U.S. Atlantic HMS quota or entitlements.
The proposed chartering regulations would establish a process and
criteria for NMFS's evaluation of proposed chartering arrangements and
certain limitations on such chartering arrangements. Under the proposed
regulations, only Atlantic HMS LAP holders would be allowed to enter
these types of chartering arrangements with foreign entities of ICCAT
CPCs. NMFS is proposing to limit these chartering arrangements to
Atlantic HMS LAP holders, who are allowed to harvest Atlantic HMS from
the U.S. EEZ and on the high seas. As noted earlier, with regard to
U.S. chartering of foreign vessels, this proposed rule would only allow
such activities on the high seas. Under the rule as proposed, only
those Atlantic HMS LAP holders who are currently authorized to harvest
HMS on the high seas would be chartering vessels to, essentially,
exercise that harvesting privilege on their behalf. This approach
should, generally, keep any resulting chartering arrangements within
the scope of existing analyzed effects of utilizing Atlantic HMS quotas
on the high seas. For the duration of the chartering arrangement, the
Atlantic HMS LAP holder would not be permitted to fish under U.S.
Atlantic HMS quotas or otherwise utilize the LAPs themselves. In
addition, under the proposed regulations, foreign vessel owners who
enter into a chartering arrangement with an Atlantic HMS LAP holder
would be required to follow all U.S. regulations that would have
otherwise applied to the Atlantic HMS LAP holder. Lastly, the proposed
regulations would establish data reporting requirements consistent with
the ICCAT recommendation.
Since implementing the chartering regulations in 2004, NMFS has
only received three requests for chartering permits, only one of which
was issued. NMFS has not received a specific chartering request in
2008. Upon receipt of any such request, NMFS would conduct the
necessary ecological, economic, and social analysis, including any
necessary NEPA analysis, to consider the impacts of the specific
chartering request on the HMS fishery and its participants. NMFS does
not expect this regulatory modification to result in many additional
requests, and NMFS does not expect these potential chartering
arrangements to increase fishing mortality or increase fishing effort
significantly.
For the chartering portion of this proposed rule, NMFS has
determined that the proposed regulatory modification is administrative
in nature and is consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
related Environmental Impact Statement and the ICCAT Chartering
Recommendation. As defined in Sections 5.05 and Section 6.03c.3(i) of
NAO 216-6, the proposed action is an amendment of existing chartering
regulations that are administrative and technical in nature that would
not have significant environmental impacts and for which
[[Page 68401]]
any cumulative effects are negligible. As such, it is categorically
excluded from the need to prepare an Environmental Assessment.
3. Request for Comments
Comments on this proposed rule may be submitted at public hearings
(see DATES and ADDRESSES), or via mail, or fax by December 18, 2008.
NMFS will hold two public hearings to receive comments from fishery
participants and other members of the public regarding this proposed
rule. These hearings will be physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to LeAnn Southward Hogan at (301)
713-2347 at least 5 days prior to the hearing date.
The public is reminded that NMFS expects participants at the public
hearings to conduct themselves appropriately. At the beginning of each
meeting, a representative of NMFS will explain the ground rules (e.g.,
alcohol is prohibited from the hearing room; attendees will be called
to give their comments in the order in which they register to speak;
the attendees should not interrupt one another). The NMFS
representative will attempt to structure the meeting so that all
attending member of the public will be able to comment, if they so
choose, regardless of the controversial nature of the subject(s).
Attendees are expected to respect the ground rules, and, if they do
not, they will be asked to leave the meeting. For individuals unable to
attend a hearing, NMFS also solicits written comments on this proposed
rule (see DATES and ADDRESSES).
4. Classification
The Acting Assistant Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the Consolidated HMS FMP, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, ATCA, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Council for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Council for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The certification reads:
Swordfish Quotas
The final 2007 and 2008 North and South Atlantic swordfish
baseline quotas were published in the Federal Register on October 5,
2007 (72 FR 56929). This proposed rule would adjust the 2008
baseline quotas for the North and South Atlantic swordfish fisheries
for the 2008 fishing year (January 1, 2008, through December 31,
2008) to account for 2007 underharvests per 50 part 635.27(c) and
transfer 18.8 metric tons (mt) dressed weight (dw) to Canada from
the reserve category. Consistent with Federal regulations (50 CFR
part 635.27(c)(1)), the 2008 North Atlantic swordfish directed
baseline quotas plus the 2007 underharvests would be divided equally
between the semiannual periods of January through May and June
through December, 2008. The 2007 total underharvest for North
Atlantic swordfish was 3,220.1 mt dw and 150.4 mt dw for South
Atlantic swordfish. However, since the underharvest carryover amount
has been capped (for the North Atlantic swordfish at 1468.8 mt dw,
and 75.2 mt dw for South Atlantic swordfish), the proposed 2008
adjusted quotas for the North and South Atlantic swordfish would be
4,406.4 mt dw and 150.4 mt dw, respectively. These 2008 adjusted
quotas are the same as the adjusted quotas for the 2007 fishing year
which were analyzed in the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(EA) prepared for the 2007 Swordfish Specifications Final Rule
published on October 5, 2007 (FR 72 56929).
The commercial swordfish fishery is comprised of fishermen who
hold a swordfish directed, incidental, or handgear limited access
permits (LAP) and the related industries including processors, bait
houses, and equipment suppliers, all of which NMFS considers to be
small entities according to the size standards set by the Small
Business Administration. As of May 2007, there were approximately
180 fishermen with a directed swordfish LAP, 78 fishermen with an
incidental swordfish (LAP), and 88 fishermen with a handgear (LAP)
for swordfish. Based on the 2006 swordfish ex-vessel price per pound
of $3.58, the 2008 North Atlantic swordfish baseline quota could
result in revenues of $23,184, 913 (6,476,232 lbs dw * $3.58) and
$593,513 (165,785 lbs dw * 3.58) for South Atlantic quota if the
quota was fully utilized. As proposed in this action, the 2008
baseline quotas would be adjusted to account for the 2007
underharvest which could result in additional revenues for the North
and South Atlantic swordfish fisheries of $34,777,370 and
$1,187,027, respectively, for fully utilized quotas. Potential
revenues on a per vessel basis, considering a total of 346 swordfish
permit holders, could be $100,512 for the North Atlantic swordfish
fishery and $3,431 for the South Atlantic swordfish fishery.
However, in both the North and South Atlantic swordfish fisheries,
the pelagic longline fleet has not caught the entire U.S. swordfish
quota for many years. For example, the total 2007 North Atlantic
swordfish landings were 1,167.5 mt dw and the current 2008 landings
for North Atlantic swordfish, as of April 30, 2008, are 443.3 mt dw.
Therefore, because the United States is not expected to catch its
entire quota, and the quotas adjustments are the same in 2008 as in
2007, NMFS does not expect these quota adjustments to have a
significant economic impact on a large number of small entities.
Chartering Regulations
This proposed rule would also modify regulations regarding
vessel chartering. At its 2002 annual meeting, ICCAT adopted a
chartering recommendation (ICCAT Recommendation 02-21) allowing
Contracting Parties to the ICCAT Convention to charter fishing
vessels registered to responsible Contracting Parties, Cooperating
non-Contracting Parties, Entities or Fishing Entities (CPCs) that
explicitly agree to apply ICCAT conservation and management measures
and enforce them on their vessels.
Pursuant to this recommendation, NMFS implemented regulations on
December 6, 2004 (69 FR 70396). These regulations took a limited
approach to chartering by allowing entities from ICCAT Contracting
Parties to charter U.S. fishing vessels but not allowing U.S.
entities to charter foreign vessels in the same way. Current
regulations allow chartering arrangements between U.S. fishing
vessel owners and foreign entities under which a U.S. fishing vessel
can fish in waters beyond national jurisdiction without reflagging
the vessel, and the U.S. fishing vessel's catch counts against the
ICCAT quota of the Contracting Party of the chartering foreign
entity. These regulations require the owner of a U.S. fishing vessel
to apply for and obtain a chartering permit from NMFS before fishing
under such a chartering arrangement.
When NMFS developed and implemented the current chartering
regulations, interest was expressed in allowing U.S. fishing vessels
to be chartered by foreign entities of an ICCAT Contracting Party
and to allow the catch taken to count against the ICCAT Contracting
Party's quota. However, due to legal and policy concerns related to
foreign vessels and foreign fishing in the U.S. exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) and little public interest in chartering arrangements
where a foreign vessel's catch would count against U.S. Atlantic HMS
quotas or entitlements, NMFS did not implement regulations that
would allow U.S. entities to charter foreign vessels to catch ICCAT-
managed species that would count against U.S. quotas or
entitlements.
Since implementing the chartering regulations, there has been
increased public interest in allowing U.S. entities to charter
foreign vessels of ICCAT CPCs where the catch taken would count
against the U.S. Atlantic HMS quotas or entitlements, possibly as a
step toward revitalizing certain HMS fisheries. This type of
chartering arrangement could also help utilize Atlantic HMS quotas
and facilitate flexibility within the vessel chartering program,
which would in turn enhance quota management within the Atlantic HMS
fisheries. Thus, NMFS is proposing changes to the current chartering
regulations that would allow chartering of foreign vessels of ICCAT
CPCs to fish on the high seas against U.S. Atlantic HMS quota or
entitlements.
The proposed chartering regulations would establish a process
and criteria for NMFS's evaluation of proposed chartering
arrangements and certain limitations on such chartering
arrangements. Under the proposed regulations, only Atlantic HMS LAP
holders would be allowed to enter these types of
[[Page 68402]]
chartering arrangements with foreign entities of ICCAT CPCs. NMFS is
proposing to limit these chartering arrangements to Atlantic HMS LAP
holders because, by having been issued an Atlantic HMS LAP, these
permitees are allowed to harvest Atlantic HMS from the U.S. EEZ and
on the high seas. Under the rule as proposed, only those Atlantic
HMS LAP holders who currently are authorized to harvest HMS on the
high seas would be chartering vessels to, essentially, exercise that
harvesting privilege on their behalf. This approach should,
generally, keep any resulting chartering arrangements within the
scope of existing analyzed effects of utilizing Atlantic HMS quotas
on the high seas. During the length of the chartering arrangement,
the Atlantic HMS LAP holder would not be permitted to fish under
Atlantic HMS quotas or otherwise utilize the LAPs themselves. In
addition, under the proposed regulations, foreign vessel owners who
enter into a chartering arrangement with an Atlantic HMS LAP holder
would be required to follow all U.S. regulations that would have
otherwise applied to the Atlantic HMS LAP holder.
Since implementing the chartering regulations in 2004, NMFS has
only received three requests for chartering permits, only one of
which was issued. NMFS has not received a specific chartering
request in 2008. Upon receipt of any such request, NMFS would
conduct the necessary ecological, economic, and social analysis,
including any necessary NEPA analysis, to consider the impacts of
the specific chartering request on the HMS fishery and its
participants. NMFS does not expect this regulatory modification to
result in many additional requests, and NMFS does not expect these
potential chartering arrangements to increase fishing mortality or
increase fishing effort significantly. It is unlikely that
activities conducted by foreign vessels under a chartering agreement
would result in any economic impacts on domestic small businesses.
Therefore, NMFS does not expect this regulatory modification to
result in significant impacts on a substantial number of small
entities.
Conclusion
This proposed rule would not result in any increase in fishing
mortality, change basic fishing practices, or pose any significant
impacts to the human environment. Therefore, NMFS does not expect
the minor regulatory modifications to the vessel chartering
regulations or the carryover of underharvests to have significant
economic impacts on small entities.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Management, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Treaties.
Dated: November 12, 2008.
Samuel D. Rauch III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 635 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 635--ATLANTIC HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 635 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 635.5, paragraph (a)(5) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 635.5 Recordkeeping and reporting.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(5) Chartering arrangements. (i) Where a U.S. vessel is chartered
by a foreign entity (e.g., government, company, person) of an ICCAT
Contracting Party.
(A) For the purposes of paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section, a
chartering arrangement means any contract, agreement, or commitment
between a U.S. fishing vessel owner and a foreign entity of an ICCAT
Contracting Party by which the control, use, possession, or services of
a U.S. fishing vessel are secured, for a period of time for fishing
targeting Atlantic HMS against the ICCAT quota of the chartering
foreign entity's Contracting Party. Chartering arrangements under this
part do not include bareboat charters under which a vessel enters into
a fishing agreement with a foreign entity, changes registration to fish
under another country's registration then, once the agreed-upon fishing
is completed, reverts back to the vessel's original registration.
(B) If a foreign entity of an ICCAT Contracting Party wants to
enter into a chartering arrangement with a U.S. fishing vessel owner,
the ICCAT Contracting Party and the U.S vessel owner must be in full
compliance with ICCAT conservation and management measures.
(C) Before fishing under a chartering arrangement under paragraph
(a)(5)(i) of this section, the owner of a U.S. fishing vessel must
apply for, and obtain, a chartering permit as specified in Sec.
635.32(e). If a chartering permit is obtained, the U.S. fishing vessel
owner must submit catch information as specified in the terms and
conditions of that permit. All catches will be recorded and counted
against the applicable ICCAT quota of the chartering foreign entity's
Contracting Party and, unless otherwise provided in the chartering
permit, must be offloaded in the ports of the chartering foreign
entity's ICCAT Contracting Party or offloaded under the direct
supervision of the chartering foreign entity's ICCAT Contracting Party.
(D) If the chartering arrangement terminates before the expiration
of the chartering permit, the U.S. fishing vessel owner must notify
NMFS immediately and in writing. Such notification requirements shall
also apply to situations where the chartering arrangement is
temporarily suspended and during intermittent periods where the vessel
may be fishing under Atlantic HMS quotas.
(ii) Where a foreign vessel is chartered by an Atlantic HMS LAP
holder.
(A) For the purposes of paragraph (a)(5)(ii) of this section, a
chartering arrangement means any contract, agreement, or commitment
between an Atlantic HMS LAP holder and a foreign vessel owner of an
ICCAT CPC by which the control, use, possession, or services of a
foreign vessel are secured, for a period of time for fishing targeting
Atlantic HMS on the high seas against the Atlantic HMS quota or
entitlements of the United States. Atlantic HMS LAP holders shall not
fish using their LAP permit(s) during the duration of the chartering
arrangement.
(B) NMFS will consider on a case-by-case basis and must approve in
writing, any proposed chartering arrangement under paragraph (a)(5)(ii)
of this section. Both the ICCAT CPC and a foreign vessel owner of an
ICCAT CPC wishing to enter into a chartering arrangement with an
Atlantic HMS LAP holder must be in full compliance with ICCAT
conservation and management measures. Vessels on the ICCAT IUU vessel
list may not be chartered.
(C) Atlantic HMS LAP holders who are interested in chartering
foreign vessels of an ICCAT CPC under a chartering arrangement should
include the following information in their request to NMFS:
(1) Information regarding the proposed chartering operation,
including the ICCAT CPC's vessel name, vessel registration, and flag of
the vessel;
(2) A copy of the proposed chartering arrangement between the
Atlantic HMS LAP holder and the ICCAT CPC's vessel owner;
(3) The species to be fished, amount of fishing expected, and gear
types to be used;
(4) The general geographic areas to be fished;
[[Page 68403]]
(5) A letter of consent from the government of the ICCAT CPC
vessel's flag state;
(6) The timeframe of the chartering arrangement; and
(7) Anticipated benefits to the United States, including, but not
limited to, the use of U.S. processing facilities/personnel, and
specific positive effects on U.S. employment.
(D) After reviewing the information submitted, NMFS will evaluate
whether the proposed chartering arrangement provides adequate benefit
to the United States and will consider the implications of the
arrangement for Atlantic HMS quota management. Atlantic HMS LAP holders
who submit chartering arrangement requests to NMFS will be contacted if
the chartering arrangement is authorized and will be notified of the
requirements and terms of approval, including data submission
requirements. NMFS may decide to deny a chartering arrangement request.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 635.32, paragraphs (e) (1) through (4) and (e)(6) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 635.32 Specifically authorized activities.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) For activities consistent with the purposes of this section,
Sec. 635.5(a)(5)(i), and Sec. 600.745(b)(1) of this chapter, NMFS may
issue chartering permits to a U.S. fishing vessel owner. An application
for a chartering permit must include all information required under
Sec. 600.745(b)(2) of this chapter and, in addition, written
notification of: the species of fish covered by the chartering
arrangement and quota allocated to the chartering foreign entity's
ICCAT Contracting Party; duration of the arrangement; measures adopted
by the chartering foreign entity's ICCAT Contracting Party to implement
ICCAT chartering provisions; copies of fishing licenses, permits, and/
or other authorizations issued by the chartering foreign entity for the
U.S. fishing vessel to fish under the arrangement; a copy of the High
Seas Fishing Compliance Act Permit pursuant to Sec. 300.10 of this
title; documentation regarding interactions with protected resources;
and documentation regarding the legal establishment of the chartering
entity. To be considered complete, an application for a chartering
permit from a U.S. fishing vessel owner must include all information
specified in Sec. 600.745(b)(2) of this chapter and in this paragraph
(e).
(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of Sec. 600.745 of this chapter
and other provisions of this part, a valid chartering permit is
required to fish for, take, retain, or possess ICCAT- regulated species
under chartering arrangements as specified in Sec. 635.5(a)(5)(i). A
valid chartering permit must be on board the U.S. fishing vessel, must
be available when ICCAT-regulated species are landed, and must be
presented for inspection upon request of an authorized officer. A
chartering permit is valid for the duration of the chartering
arrangement or until the expiration date specified on the permit,
whichever comes first. U.S. fishing vessel owners issued a chartering
permit shall not be authorized to fish under applicable U.S. Atlantic
HMS quotas or entitlements until the chartering permit expires or is
terminated.
(3) Chartering permit holders must submit logbooks and comply with
reporting requirements as specified in Sec. 635.5. NMFS will provide
specific conditions and requirements in the chartering permit, so as to
ensure consistency, to the extent possible, with laws of the ICCAT
Contracting Party, the Consolidated HMS FMP, as well as ICCAT
recommendations.
(4) Observers may be placed on board U.S. fishing vessels issued
chartering permits as specified under Sec. 635.7.
* * * * *
(6) A U.S. fishing vessel shall be authorized to fish under only
one chartering arrangement at a time.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 635.71:
A. Paragraphs (a)(42), (43), and (44) are revised.
B. Paragraphs (a)(45) through (a)(53) are redesignated as
paragraphs (a)(46) through (a)(54), respectively.
C. A new paragraph (a)(45) is added.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 635.71 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(42) Count chartering arrangement catches against quotas other than
those defined in Sec. 635.5(a)(5).
(43) Fail to submit catch information regarding fishing activities
conducted under a chartering arrangement with a foreign vessel owner,
as specified in Sec. 635.5(a)(5).
(44) Offload catch taken under a chartering arrangement in ports
other than the ports of the chartering foreign entity's ICCAT
Contracting Party or offload catch without the direct supervision of
the chartering foreign entity's ICCAT Contracting Party as specified
Sec. 635.5(a)(5).
(45) Fish for, take, retain, or possess ICCAT-regulated species
under a chartering arrangement as specified in Sec. 635.5(a)(5)(i)
without a valid chartering permit on board the vessel and available
upon the request of an authorized officer.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-27337 Filed 11-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S