Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; SOMATULINE DEPOT, 67874-67875 [E8-27179]
Download as PDF
67874
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 222 / Monday, November 17, 2008 / Notices
Compliance With Section 301 of the
Medical Device User Fee and
Modernization Act of 2002, as
Amended: Prominent and Conspicuous
Mark of Manufacturers on Single-Use
Devices (formerly ‘‘Reprocessed SingleUse Device Labeling’’) (Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Section 502(u))
(OMB Control Number 0910–0577)—
Extension
Section 502 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
352), among other things, establishes
requirements that the label or labeling of
a medical device must meet so that it is
not misbranded and subject to
regulatory action. Section 301 of the
Medical Device User Fee and
Modernization Act of 2002 (Public Law
107–250) amended section 502 of the
act to add section 502(u) to require
devices (both new and reprocessed) to
bear prominently and conspicuously the
name of the manufacturer, a generally
recognized abbreviation of such name,
or a unique and generally recognized
symbol identifying the manufacturer.
Thus, the name for this information
collection activity has been changed to
more accurately describe the
information collection content.
Section 2(c) of The Medical Device
User Fee Stabilization Act of 2005
(Public Law 109–43) amends section
502(u) of the act by limiting the
provision to reprocessed single-use
devices (SUDs) and the manufacturers
who reprocess them. Under the
amended provision, if the original SUD
or an attachment to it prominently and
conspicuously bears the name of the
manufacturer, then the reprocessor of
the SUD is required to identify itself by
name, abbreviation, or symbol, in a
prominent and conspicuous manner on
the device or attachment to the device.
If the original SUD does not
prominently and conspicuously bear the
name of the manufacturer, the
manufacturer who reprocesses the SUD
for reuse may identify itself using a
detachable label that is intended to be
affixed to the patient record.
The requirements of section 502(u) of
the act impose a minimal burden on
industry. This section of the act only
requires the manufacturer, packer, or
distributor of a device to include their
name and address on the labeling of a
device. This information is readily
available to the establishment and easily
supplied. From its registration and
premarket submission database, FDA
estimates that there are 10
establishments that distribute
approximately 1,000 reprocessed SUDs.
Each response is anticipated to take 0.1
hours resulting in a total burden to
industry of 100 hours.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
No. of
Respondents
Section of the Act
502(u)
No. of Responses
per Respondent
10
1 There
Total Annual
Responses
100
1,000
Dated: November 5, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–27178 Filed 11–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
SOMATULINE DEPOT and is
publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–E–0111]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; SOMATULINE DEPOT
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Total Hours
.1
100
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
AGENCY:
Hours Per
Response
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Nov 14, 2008
Jkt 217001
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes
effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts
with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug
product and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will
include all of the testing phase and
approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product SOMATULINE
DEPOT (lanreotide). SOMATULINE
DEPOT is indicated for the long-term
treatment of acromegalic patients who
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 222 / Monday, November 17, 2008 / Notices
have had an inadequate response to or
cannot be treated with surgery and/or
radiotherapy. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for SOMATULINE DEPOT
(U.S. Patent No. 5,595,760) from Society
De Conseils De Recherches Et
D’Applications Scientifiques, and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
FDA’s assistance in determining this
patent’s eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated April 22,
2008, FDA advised the Patent and
Trademark Office that this human drug
product had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
SOMATULINE DEPOT represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Shortly thereafter,
the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
SOMATULINE DEPOT is 3,629 days. Of
this time, 3,324 days occurred during
the testing phase of the regulatory
review period, while 305 days occurred
during the approval phase. These
periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355) became effective: September 24,
1997. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the date the investigational
new drug application became effective
was on September 24, 1997.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: October 30, 2006. FDA
has verified the applicant’s claim that
the new drug application (NDA) for
SOMATULINE DEPOT (NDA 22–074)
was initially submitted on October 30,
2006.
3. The date the application was
approved: August 30, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
22–074 was approved on August 30,
2007.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 5 years of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:18 Nov 14, 2008
Jkt 217001
67875
redetermination by January 16, 2009.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
May 18, 2009. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: October 20, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8–27179 Filed 11–14–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[FEMA–1804–DR]
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[FEMA–1795–DR]
Indiana; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of
a Major Disaster Declaration
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Indiana (FEMA–1795–DR),
dated September 23, 2008, and related
determinations.
DATES: Effective Date: November 7,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3886.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The notice
of a major disaster declaration for the
State of Indiana is hereby amended to
include the following areas among those
areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major
disaster by the President in his
declaration of September 23, 2008.
LaPorte County for Public Assistance
(already designated for Individual
Assistance).
Daviess County for Public Assistance.
(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households In Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)
R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8–27164 Filed 11–14–08; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Arkansas; Major Disaster and Related
Determinations
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This is a notice of the
Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Arkansas
(FEMA–1804–DR), dated October 22,
2008, and related determinations.
DATES: Effective Date: October 22, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–3886.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that, in a letter dated
October 22, 2008, the President declared
a major disaster under the authority of
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act, 42
E:\FR\FM\17NON1.SGM
17NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 222 (Monday, November 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67874-67875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-27179]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-E-0111]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; SOMATULINE DEPOT
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for SOMATULINE DEPOT and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product
SOMATULINE DEPOT (lanreotide). SOMATULINE DEPOT is indicated for the
long-term treatment of acromegalic patients who
[[Page 67875]]
have had an inadequate response to or cannot be treated with surgery
and/or radiotherapy. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and
Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for
SOMATULINE DEPOT (U.S. Patent No. 5,595,760) from Society De Conseils
De Recherches Et D'Applications Scientifiques, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated
April 22, 2008, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this
human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that
the approval of SOMATULINE DEPOT represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
SOMATULINE DEPOT is 3,629 days. Of this time, 3,324 days occurred
during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 305
days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355) became effective:
September 24, 1997. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the
date the investigational new drug application became effective was on
September 24, 1997.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: October 30,
2006. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) for SOMATULINE DEPOT (NDA 22-074) was initially
submitted on October 30, 2006.
3. The date the application was approved: August 30, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 22-074 was approved on August
30, 2007.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 5 years of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
Addresses) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by January 16, 2009. Furthermore, any interested person may petition
FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension
acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by May 18,
2009. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: October 20, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8-27179 Filed 11-14-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S