Maximum Civil Money Penalty Amounts and Compliance With the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act, 66811-66815 [E8-26864]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
§ 319.56–48
Eggplant from Israel.
Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)
may be imported into the continental
United States from Israel only under the
conditions described in this section.
These conditions are designed to
prevent the introduction of the
following quarantine pests: Ceratitis
capitata, Eutetranychus orientalis,
Helicoverpa armigera, Nipaecoccus
viridis, Scirtothrips dorsalis, and
Spodoptera littoralis.
(a) Approved pest-exclusionary
structures. The eggplant must be grown
in pest-exclusionary structures in
approved production sites in the Arava
Valley of Israel by growers registered
with the Israeli national plant protection
organization (NPPO). Initial approval of
the production sites must be completed
jointly by the Israeli NPPO and APHIS.
(1) The pest-exclusionary structures
must be equipped with double selfclosing doors.
(2) Any vents or openings in the pestexclusionary structures (other than the
double self-closing doors) must be
covered with 1.6 mm or smaller
screening in order to prevent the entry
of pests into the pest-exclusionary
structure.
(3) The pest-exclusionary structures
must be inspected periodically by the
Israeli NPPO or its approved designee to
ensure that sanitary procedures are
employed to exclude plant pests and
diseases and to verify that the screening
is intact.
(4) The pest-exclusionary structures
also must be inspected monthly for the
quarantine pests listed in the
introductory text of this section by the
Israeli NPPO or its approved designee,
beginning 2 months before harvest and
continuing for the duration of the
harvest. APHIS must be granted access
to inspect or monitor the pestexclusionary structures during this
period as well. If, during these
inspections, any quarantine pests listed
in the introductory text of this section
are found inside a pest-exclusionary
structure, the Israeli NPPO will
immediately prohibit that pestexclusionary structure from exporting
eggplant to the continental United
States and notify APHIS of the action.
The prohibition will remain in effect
until the Israeli NPPO and APHIS agree
that the risk has been mitigated.
(b) Trapping for Medfly. Trapping for
Mediterranean fruit fly (Medfly,
Ceratitis capitata) is required both
inside and outside the pest-exclusionary
structures. Trapping must begin 2
months before harvest and continue for
the duration of the harvest.
(1) Inside the pest-exclusionary
structures. APHIS-approved fruit fly
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:29 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
traps with an approved protein bait
must be placed inside the pestexclusionary structures at a density of
four traps per hectare, with a minimum
of at least two traps per pestexclusionary structure. The traps must
be serviced at least once every 7 days.
If a single Medfly is found in a trap
inside a pest-exclusionary structure, the
Israeli NPPO will immediately prohibit
that pest-exclusionary structure from
exporting eggplant to the continental
United States and notify APHIS of the
action. The prohibition will remain in
effect until the Israeli NPPO and APHIS
agree that the risk has been mitigated.
(2) Outside the pest-exclusionary
structures. (i) No shade trees are
permitted within 10 meters of the entry
door of the pest-exclusionary structures,
and no fruit fly host plants are
permitted within 50 meters of the entry
door of the pest-exclusionary structures.
While trapping is being conducted, no
fruit fly host material (such as fruit) may
be brought into the pest-exclusionary
structures or be discarded within 50
meters of the entry door of the pestexclusionary structures.
(ii) A treatment jointly approved by
the Israeli NPPO and APHIS must be
applied for the duration of the eggplant
harvest in the areas of the Arava Valley
where fruit fly host material occurs in
backyards.
(iii) Trapping for Medfly must be
conducted by the Israeli NPPO or its
approved designee throughout the year
in the agricultural region along the
Arava Highway 90 and in the residential
area of Paran.
(iv) Trapping records must be kept
and made available for APHIS review
upon request.
(c) Packinghouse procedures. The
eggplant must be packed within 24
hours of harvest in a pest-exclusionary
packinghouse. While packing the
eggplant for export to the continental
United States, the packinghouse may
only accept eggplant from approved
pest-exclusionary structures. No shade
trees are permitted within 10 meters of
the entry door of the packinghouse, and
no fruit fly host plants are permitted
within 50 meters of the entry door of the
packinghouse. The eggplant must be
safeguarded by a pest-proof screen or
plastic tarpaulin while in transit to the
packinghouse and while awaiting
packing. Packinghouse procedures must
include culling of any visibly damaged,
overripe, or infested eggplant. The
eggplant must be packed in either
individual insect-proof cartons or boxes
labeled with the specific place of origin
or non-insect-proof cartons or boxes that
are covered by insect-proof mesh or
plastic tarpaulins. Covered non-insect-
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66811
proof cartons or boxes must be placed
in shipping containers that have
identification labels indicating the
specific place of origin. These
safeguards must remain intact until the
arrival of the eggplant in the continental
United States or the consignment will
not be allowed to enter the continental
United States.
(d) Commercial consignments.
Eggplant from Israel may be imported in
commercial consignments only.
(e) Phytosanitary certificate. Each
consignment of eggplant must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate of inspection issued by the
Israeli NPPO with an additional
declaration reading as follows: ‘‘The
eggplant in this consignment has been
grown in an approved production site
and inspected and found free of the
pests listed in 7 CFR 319.56*48.’’
Done in Washington, DC, this 5th day of
November 2008.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E8–26814 Filed 11–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0561]
Maximum Civil Money Penalty
Amounts and Compliance With the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is publishing this
companion proposed rule to the direct
final rule, published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, which is
intended to amend our regulations to
adjust for inflation the maximum civil
money penalty amounts for the various
civil money penalty authorities within
our jurisdiction. We are taking this
action to comply with the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990 (FCPIAA), as amended. The last
adjustment was published in the
Federal Register of July 20, 2004 (69 FR
43299), and the FCPIAA requires
Federal agencies to adjust their civil
money penalties at least once every 4
years. This proposed rule does not
adjust the civil money provisions
E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM
12NOP1
66812
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Proposed Rules
enacted by the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA).
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the proposed rule by
December 26, 2008. If FDA receives any
timely significant adverse comments,
the agency will publish a document
withdrawing the direct final rule within
30 days after the comment period ends.
FDA will then proceed to respond to
comments under this proposed rule
using the usual notice-and-comment
procedures.
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2008–N–
0561, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions]:
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
To ensure more timely processing of
comments, FDA is no longer accepting
comments submitted to the agency by email. FDA encourages you to continue
to submit electronic comments by using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal or the
agency Web site, as described
previously, in the ADDRESSES portion of
this document under Electronic
Submissions.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0561 for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Interested
persons may submit to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
written or electronic comments
regarding this document. Submit a
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:29 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
single copy of electronic comments or
two paper copies of any mailed
comments, except that individuals may
submit one paper copy. Comments are
to be identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik
Mettler, Office of Policy (HF–11), Food
and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
3360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In general, the FCPIAA (28 U.S.C.
2461 note, as amended by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (31
U.S.C. 3701)) requires Federal agencies
to issue regulations to adjust for
inflation each civil monetary penalty
provided by law within their
jurisdiction. The FCPIAA directs
agencies to adjust the civil monetary
penalties by October 23, 1996, and to
make additional adjustments at least
once every 4 years thereafter. The
adjustments are based on changes in the
cost of living, and the FCPIAA defines
the cost of living adjustment as: ‘‘ * *
* the percentage (if any) for each civil
monetary penalty by which—(1) the
Consumer Price Index for the month of
June of the calendar year preceding the
adjustment, exceeds (2) the Consumer
Price Index for the month of June of the
calendar year in which the amount of
such civil monetary penalty was last set
or adjusted pursuant to law’’ (28 U.S.C.
2461 note, section 5(b)).
The FCPIAA also prescribes a
rounding method based on the size of
the penalty after the calculated increase,
but states that the first adjustment of a
civil monetary penalty may not exceed
10 percent of the penalty.
The FCPIAA defines a civil monetary
penalty as: ‘‘any penalty, fine, or other
sanction that—(A)(i) is for a specific
monetary amount as provided by
Federal law; or (ii) has a maximum
amount provided for by Federal law;
and (B) is assessed or enforced by an
agency pursuant to Federal law; and (C)
is assessed or enforced pursuant to an
administrative proceeding or a civil
action in the Federal Courts’’ (28 U.S.C.
2461 note, section 3(2)).
Congress enacted the FCPIAA, in part,
because it found that the impact of civil
monetary penalties had been reduced by
inflation and that reducing the impact of
civil monetary penalties had weakened
their deterrent effect.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
In the Federal Register of July 20,
2004 (69 FR 43299), we published a
final rule that identified 14 civil
monetary penalties that fall within our
jurisdiction and are subject to
adjustments under the FCPIAA. The
final rule amended our regulations
governing civil money penalties
hearings found at part 17 (21 CFR part
17) to establish a new § 17.2 entitled
‘‘Maximum penalty amounts’’ to show
the maximum civil monetary penalty
amounts that were adjusted under the
FCPIAA. The final rule also revised
§ 17.1, which lists statutory provisions
authorizing civil money penalties
governed by the civil money penalty
regulations as of August 28, 1995,
updating the statutory citations.
II. What Changes Did We Make?
We revised the list of statutory
monetary penalties in § 17.1 to include
the new penalties prescribed by the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,
as amended by FDAAA in 2007. These
new penalties have been added as
proposed new paragraphs (c) and (d).
The table in § 17.2 has also been
amended to include the new penalties,
and the adjusted maximum penalty
amounts for the pre-FDAAA penalties
have been updated to account for the
inflation between June 2004 (the year of
the last adjustment) and June 2007 as
prescribed by FCPIAA. The per
violation amount for 21 U.S.C.
333(f)(1)(A), the per violation per person
amount for 21 U.S.C. 360pp(b)(1), and
the per violation amount for 42 U.S.C.
263b(h)(3) have not been adjusted
because the rounding rules of FCPIAA
prevent an inflation adjustment in these
cases. The new FDAAA penalties have
also not been adjusted because Congress
only recently passed FDAAA on
September 27, 2007. Finally, the
‘‘Description of the Violation’’ column
in the table in § 17.2 is proposed to be
removed, as it is unnecessary for
purposes of merely showing the
adjustment in penalty amounts.
III. What is Proposed?
In brief, the proposed rule would:
• Revise § 17.1 to update the statutory
citations regarding the new civil
monetary penalties prescribed by
FDAAA, and
• Revise the table in § 17.2 to include
the new FDAAA penalties, and adjusts
the pre-FDAAA maximum civil penalty
amounts for inflation as prescribed by
FCPIAA.
IV. Additional Information
This proposed rule incorporates
requirements specifically set forth in the
FCPIAA requiring FDA to issue a
E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM
12NOP1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Proposed Rules
regulation implementing inflation
adjustments for all its civil penalty
provisions. These technical changes,
required by law, do not substantively
alter the existing regulatory framework,
nor do they in any way affect the terms
under which civil penalties are assessed
by FDA. The formula for the amount of
the penalty adjustment is prescribed by
Congress in the FCPIAA, and these
changes are not subject to the exercise
of discretion by FDA. In addition, FDA
has made conforming changes to the
regulations, which have no substantive
effect, to reflect the new penalties
prescribed by Congress in FDAAA.
This proposed rule is a companion to
the direct final rule published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register.
This companion proposed rule and the
direct final rule are identical in
substance. This companion proposed
rule will provide the procedural
framework to proceed with standard
notice-and-comment rulemaking in the
event the direct final rule receives
significant adverse comment and is
withdrawn. The comment period for the
companion proposed rule runs
concurrently with the comment period
of the direct final rule. Any comments
received under the companion proposed
rule will be treated as comments
regarding the direct final rule and vice
versa.
A significant adverse comment is one
that explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without change. A
comment recommending a rule change
in addition to this rule will not be
considered a significant adverse
comment unless the comment states
why this rule would be ineffective
without the additional change.
If no significant adverse comment is
received in response to the direct final
rule, no further action will be taken
related to the companion proposed rule.
Instead, we will publish a confirmation
document within 30 days after the
comment period ends. We intend the
direct final rule to become effective 30
days after publication of the
confirmation document.
If we receive significant adverse
comments, we will withdraw the direct
final rule. We will proceed to respond
to all the comments received regarding
the direct final rule, treating those
comments as comments to this proposed
rule. The agency will address the
comments in the subsequent final rule.
We will not provide additional
opportunity for comment. If we receive
a significant adverse comment which
applies to part of the rule and that part
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:29 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, we may adopt as final those
parts of the rule that are not the subject
of significant adverse comment.
For additional background
information, see the corresponding
direct final rule published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register.
V. Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.30(a) and (h) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act 1995
We conclude that the civil monetary
penalties adjustments in this proposed
rule are not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
because they do not constitute a
‘‘collection of information’’ under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). The adjustments do
not require disclosure of any
information to FDA, third parties, or the
public.
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA
has determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, the
agency has concluded that the rule does
not contain policies that have
federalism implications as defined in
the Executive order and, consequently,
a federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
VIII. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public
Law 104–4). Executive Order 12866
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). The agency
believes that this proposed rule is not a
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66813
significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because the proposed rule
simply proposes to adjust the maximum
amount of civil monetary penalties
administered by FDA, and because the
adjustment is required by the FCPIAA,
the agency certifies that the proposed
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $130
million, using the most current (2007)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this proposed rule to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
IX. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
This comment period runs concurrently
with the comment period for the direct
final rule; any comments received will
be considered as comments regarding
the direct final rule. Submit a single
copy of electronic comments or two
paper copies of any mailed comments,
except that individuals may submit one
paper copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and
procedure, Penalties.
E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM
12NOP1
66814
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Public
Health Service Act, and under authority
delegated to the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs, 21 CFR part 17 is amended
as follows:
PART 17—CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES
HEARINGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 331, 333, 337, 351,
352, 355, 360, 360c, 360f, 360i, 360j, 371; 42
U.S.C. 262, 263b, 300aa–28; 5 U.S.C. 554,
555, 556, 557.
2. Section 17.1 is amended by
redesignating paragraphs (c) through (g)
as paragraphs (e) through (i) and by
adding new paragraphs (c) and (d) to
read as follows:
§ 17.1
Scope.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Section 303(f)(3) of the act
authorizing civil money penalties for
certain violations relating to the
submission of certifications and/or
clinical trial information to the clinical
trial data bank and section 303(f)(4) of
the act authorizing civil money
penalties for certain violations of the act
relating to postmarket studies, clinical
trial requirements, and risk evaluation
and mitigation strategies for drugs.
(d) Section 303(g)(1) of the act
authorizing civil money penalties for
certain violations of the act that relate
to dissemination of direct-to-consumer
advertisements for approved drugs or
biological products.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 17.2 is revised to read as
follows:
§ 17.2
Maximum penalty amounts.
The following table shows maximum
civil monetary penalties associated with
the statutory provisions authorizing
civil monetary penalties under the act or
the Public Health Service Act.
CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES AUTHORITIES ADMINISTERED BY FDA AND ADJUSTED MAXIMUM PENALTY AMOUNTS
U.S.C. Section
Former Maximum
Penalty Amount
(in dollars)
Date of Last
Penalty Figure or
Adjustment
Assessment Method
Adjusted
Maximum
Penalty
Amount (in
dollars)
21 U.S.C.
55,000
For each of the first two violations in any 10-year period
2008
60,000
333(b)(2)(B)
1,100,000
For each violation after the second conviction in any 10year period
2008
1,200,000
333(b)(3)
110,000
Per violation
2008
120,000
333(f)(1)(A)
16,500
Per violation
2008
16,500 (not
adjusted)
333(f)(1)(A)
1,100,000
For the aggregate of violations
2008
1,200,000
333(f)(2)(A)
55,000
Per individual
2008
60,000
333(f)(2)(A)
275,000
Per ‘‘any other person’’
2008
300,000
333(f)(2)(A)
550,000
For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding
2008
600,000
333(f)(3)(A)
10,000
For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding
2007
10,000 (not
adjusted)
333(f)(3)(B)
10,000
For each day the violation is not corrected after a 30-day
period following notification until the violation is corrected
2007
10,000 (not
adjusted)
333(f)(4)(A)(i)
250,000
Per violation
2007
250,000
(not
adjusted)
333(f)(4)(A)(i)
1,000,000
For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding
2007
1,000,000
(not
adjusted)
333(f)(4)(A)(ii)
250,000
For the first 30-day period (or any portion thereof) of
continued violation following notification
2007
250,000
(not
adjusted)
333(f)(4)(A)(ii)
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
333(b)(2)(A)
1,000,000
For any 30-day period, where the amount doubles for
every 30-day period of continued violation after the
first 30-day period
2007
1,000,000
(not
adjusted)
333(f)(4)(A)(ii)
10,000,000
For all violations adjudicated in a single proceeding
2007
10,000,000
(not
adjusted)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:29 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM
12NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Proposed Rules
66815
CIVIL MONETARY PENALTIES AUTHORITIES ADMINISTERED BY FDA AND ADJUSTED MAXIMUM PENALTY AMOUNTS—
Continued
U.S.C. Section
Former Maximum
Penalty Amount
(in dollars)
Date of Last
Penalty Figure or
Adjustment
Assessment Method
Adjusted
Maximum
Penalty
Amount (in
dollars)
333(g)(1)
250,000
For the first violation in any 3-year period
2007
250,000
(not
adjusted)
333(g)(1)
500,000
For each subsequent violation in any 3-year period
2007
500,000
(not
adjusted)
335b(a)
275,000
Per violation for an individual
2008
300,000
335b(a)
1,100,000
Per violation for ‘‘any other person’’
2008
1,200,000
360pp(b)(1)
1,100
Per violation per person
2008
1,100 (not
adjusted)
360pp(b)(1)
330,000
For any related series of violations
2008
355,000
263b(h)(3)
11,000
Per violation
2008
11,000 (not
adjusted)
300aa–28(b)(1)
110,000
Per occurrence
2008
120,000
42 U.S.C.
Dated: October 30, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–26864 Filed 11–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1310
[Docket No. DEA–222P]
RIN 1117–AA64
Exempt Chemical Mixtures Containing
Gamma-Butyrolactone
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: DEA is proposing that
chemical mixtures that are 70 percent or
less gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), by
weight or volume, be automatically
exempt from regulatory controls under
the Controlled Substances Act (CSA).
DEA is seeking through this rulemaking
to exempt only those chemical mixtures
that do not represent a significant risk
of diversion. If finalized as proposed,
this regulation would result in GBL
chemical mixtures, in concentrations
greater than 70 percent, becoming
subject to List I chemical regulatory
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:29 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
requirements of the CSA, except if
exempted through an existing
categorical exemption. DEA is taking
this action because there is a serious
threat to the public safety associated
with the ease by which GBL is
chemically converted to the schedule I
controlled substance gammahydroxybutyric acid (GHB).
DEA recognizes that concentration
criteria alone cannot identify all
mixtures that warrant exemption. As a
result, 21 CFR 1310.13 provides for an
application process by which
manufacturers may obtain exemptions
from CSA regulatory controls for those
GBL chemical mixtures that are not
automatically exempt under the
concentration criteria.
DATES: Written comments must be
postmarked and electronic comments
sent on or before January 12, 2009.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–222p’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence. Written
comments sent via regular or express
mail should be sent to Drug
Enforcement Administration, Attention:
DEA Federal Register Representative/
ODL, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, VA 22152. Comments may
be directly sent to DEA electronically by
sending an electronic message to
dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov.
Comments may also be sent
electronically through https://
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov using the
electronic comment form provided on
that site. An electronic copy of this
document is also available at the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
DEA will accept attachments to
electronic comments in Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file
formats only. DEA will not accept any
file format other than those specifically
listed here.
Posting of Public Comments: Please
note that all comments received are
considered part of the public record and
made available for public inspection
online at https://www.regulations.gov
and in the Drug Enforcement
Administration’s public docket. Such
information includes personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online or made available in the
public docket, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also place
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online or made
available in the public docket in the first
paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
E:\FR\FM\12NOP1.SGM
12NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 12, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66811-66815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26864]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0561]
Maximum Civil Money Penalty Amounts and Compliance With the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing this
companion proposed rule to the direct final rule, published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register, which is intended to amend our
regulations to adjust for inflation the maximum civil money penalty
amounts for the various civil money penalty authorities within our
jurisdiction. We are taking this action to comply with the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (FCPIAA), as amended.
The last adjustment was published in the Federal Register of July 20,
2004 (69 FR 43299), and the FCPIAA requires Federal agencies to adjust
their civil money penalties at least once every 4 years. This proposed
rule does not adjust the civil money provisions
[[Page 66812]]
enacted by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007
(FDAAA).
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the proposed rule by
December 26, 2008. If FDA receives any timely significant adverse
comments, the agency will publish a document withdrawing the direct
final rule within 30 days after the comment period ends. FDA will then
proceed to respond to comments under this proposed rule using the usual
notice-and-comment procedures.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2008-
N-0561, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the following ways:
FAX: 301-827-6870.
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
To ensure more timely processing of comments, FDA is no longer
accepting comments submitted to the agency by e-mail. FDA encourages
you to continue to submit electronic comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal or the agency Web site, as described previously, in
the ADDRESSES portion of this document under Electronic Submissions.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0561 for this rulemaking. All comments
received may be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. For additional information
on submitting comments, see the ``Comments'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik Mettler, Office of Policy (HF-
11), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD
20857, 301-827-3360.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In general, the FCPIAA (28 U.S.C. 2461 note, as amended by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (31 U.S.C. 3701)) requires Federal
agencies to issue regulations to adjust for inflation each civil
monetary penalty provided by law within their jurisdiction. The FCPIAA
directs agencies to adjust the civil monetary penalties by October 23,
1996, and to make additional adjustments at least once every 4 years
thereafter. The adjustments are based on changes in the cost of living,
and the FCPIAA defines the cost of living adjustment as: `` * * * the
percentage (if any) for each civil monetary penalty by which--(1) the
Consumer Price Index for the month of June of the calendar year
preceding the adjustment, exceeds (2) the Consumer Price Index for the
month of June of the calendar year in which the amount of such civil
monetary penalty was last set or adjusted pursuant to law'' (28 U.S.C.
2461 note, section 5(b)).
The FCPIAA also prescribes a rounding method based on the size of
the penalty after the calculated increase, but states that the first
adjustment of a civil monetary penalty may not exceed 10 percent of the
penalty.
The FCPIAA defines a civil monetary penalty as: ``any penalty,
fine, or other sanction that--(A)(i) is for a specific monetary amount
as provided by Federal law; or (ii) has a maximum amount provided for
by Federal law; and (B) is assessed or enforced by an agency pursuant
to Federal law; and (C) is assessed or enforced pursuant to an
administrative proceeding or a civil action in the Federal Courts'' (28
U.S.C. 2461 note, section 3(2)).
Congress enacted the FCPIAA, in part, because it found that the
impact of civil monetary penalties had been reduced by inflation and
that reducing the impact of civil monetary penalties had weakened their
deterrent effect.
In the Federal Register of July 20, 2004 (69 FR 43299), we
published a final rule that identified 14 civil monetary penalties that
fall within our jurisdiction and are subject to adjustments under the
FCPIAA. The final rule amended our regulations governing civil money
penalties hearings found at part 17 (21 CFR part 17) to establish a new
Sec. 17.2 entitled ``Maximum penalty amounts'' to show the maximum
civil monetary penalty amounts that were adjusted under the FCPIAA. The
final rule also revised Sec. 17.1, which lists statutory provisions
authorizing civil money penalties governed by the civil money penalty
regulations as of August 28, 1995, updating the statutory citations.
II. What Changes Did We Make?
We revised the list of statutory monetary penalties in Sec. 17.1
to include the new penalties prescribed by the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act, as amended by FDAAA in 2007. These new penalties have
been added as proposed new paragraphs (c) and (d). The table in Sec.
17.2 has also been amended to include the new penalties, and the
adjusted maximum penalty amounts for the pre-FDAAA penalties have been
updated to account for the inflation between June 2004 (the year of the
last adjustment) and June 2007 as prescribed by FCPIAA. The per
violation amount for 21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(A), the per violation per
person amount for 21 U.S.C. 360pp(b)(1), and the per violation amount
for 42 U.S.C. 263b(h)(3) have not been adjusted because the rounding
rules of FCPIAA prevent an inflation adjustment in these cases. The new
FDAAA penalties have also not been adjusted because Congress only
recently passed FDAAA on September 27, 2007. Finally, the ``Description
of the Violation'' column in the table in Sec. 17.2 is proposed to be
removed, as it is unnecessary for purposes of merely showing the
adjustment in penalty amounts.
III. What is Proposed?
In brief, the proposed rule would:
Revise Sec. 17.1 to update the statutory citations
regarding the new civil monetary penalties prescribed by FDAAA, and
Revise the table in Sec. 17.2 to include the new FDAAA
penalties, and adjusts the pre-FDAAA maximum civil penalty amounts for
inflation as prescribed by FCPIAA.
IV. Additional Information
This proposed rule incorporates requirements specifically set forth
in the FCPIAA requiring FDA to issue a
[[Page 66813]]
regulation implementing inflation adjustments for all its civil penalty
provisions. These technical changes, required by law, do not
substantively alter the existing regulatory framework, nor do they in
any way affect the terms under which civil penalties are assessed by
FDA. The formula for the amount of the penalty adjustment is prescribed
by Congress in the FCPIAA, and these changes are not subject to the
exercise of discretion by FDA. In addition, FDA has made conforming
changes to the regulations, which have no substantive effect, to
reflect the new penalties prescribed by Congress in FDAAA.
This proposed rule is a companion to the direct final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. This
companion proposed rule and the direct final rule are identical in
substance. This companion proposed rule will provide the procedural
framework to proceed with standard notice-and-comment rulemaking in the
event the direct final rule receives significant adverse comment and is
withdrawn. The comment period for the companion proposed rule runs
concurrently with the comment period of the direct final rule. Any
comments received under the companion proposed rule will be treated as
comments regarding the direct final rule and vice versa.
A significant adverse comment is one that explains why the rule
would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying
premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without
change. A comment recommending a rule change in addition to this rule
will not be considered a significant adverse comment unless the comment
states why this rule would be ineffective without the additional
change.
If no significant adverse comment is received in response to the
direct final rule, no further action will be taken related to the
companion proposed rule. Instead, we will publish a confirmation
document within 30 days after the comment period ends. We intend the
direct final rule to become effective 30 days after publication of the
confirmation document.
If we receive significant adverse comments, we will withdraw the
direct final rule. We will proceed to respond to all the comments
received regarding the direct final rule, treating those comments as
comments to this proposed rule. The agency will address the comments in
the subsequent final rule. We will not provide additional opportunity
for comment. If we receive a significant adverse comment which applies
to part of the rule and that part may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, we may adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not
the subject of significant adverse comment.
For additional background information, see the corresponding direct
final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
V. Environmental Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.30(a) and (h) that this action
is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act 1995
We conclude that the civil monetary penalties adjustments in this
proposed rule are not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget because they do not constitute a ``collection of information''
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
adjustments do not require disclosure of any information to FDA, third
parties, or the public.
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. FDA has determined that
the rule does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. Accordingly, the agency has concluded
that the rule does not contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive order and, consequently, a
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
VIII. Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). Executive
Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to
select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that
this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under the
Executive order.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. Because the proposed rule simply proposes to adjust
the maximum amount of civil monetary penalties administered by FDA, and
because the adjustment is required by the FCPIAA, the agency certifies
that the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $130 million, using the most current (2007) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
proposed rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
IX. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
This comment period runs concurrently with the comment period for the
direct final rule; any comments received will be considered as comments
regarding the direct final rule. Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any mailed comments, except that
individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties.
[[Page 66814]]
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the
Public Health Service Act, and under authority delegated to the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 17 is amended as follows:
PART 17--CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES HEARINGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 17 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 331, 333, 337, 351, 352, 355, 360, 360c,
360f, 360i, 360j, 371; 42 U.S.C. 262, 263b, 300aa-28; 5 U.S.C. 554,
555, 556, 557.
2. Section 17.1 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (c) through
(g) as paragraphs (e) through (i) and by adding new paragraphs (c) and
(d) to read as follows:
Sec. 17.1 Scope.
* * * * *
(c) Section 303(f)(3) of the act authorizing civil money penalties
for certain violations relating to the submission of certifications
and/or clinical trial information to the clinical trial data bank and
section 303(f)(4) of the act authorizing civil money penalties for
certain violations of the act relating to postmarket studies, clinical
trial requirements, and risk evaluation and mitigation strategies for
drugs.
(d) Section 303(g)(1) of the act authorizing civil money penalties
for certain violations of the act that relate to dissemination of
direct-to-consumer advertisements for approved drugs or biological
products.
* * * * *
3. Section 17.2 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 17.2 Maximum penalty amounts.
The following table shows maximum civil monetary penalties
associated with the statutory provisions authorizing civil monetary
penalties under the act or the Public Health Service Act.
Civil Monetary Penalties Authorities Administered by FDA and Adjusted
Maximum Penalty Amounts
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Former Adjusted
Maximum Date of Last Maximum
U.S.C. Penalty Assessment Penalty Figure Penalty
Section Amount (in Method or Adjustment Amount (in
dollars) dollars)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 U.S.C.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(b)(2 55,000 For each of the 2008 60,000
)(A) first two
violations in
any 10-year
period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(b)(2 1,100,000 For each 2008 1,200,000
)(B) violation after
the second
conviction in
any 10-year
period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(b)(3 110,000 Per violation 2008 120,000
)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(1 16,500 Per violation 2008 16,500 (not
)(A) adjusted)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(1 1,100,000 For the 2008 1,200,000
)(A) aggregate of
violations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(2 55,000 Per individual 2008 60,000
)(A)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(2 275,000 Per ``any other 2008 300,000
)(A) person''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(2 550,000 For all 2008 600,000
)(A) violations
adjudicated in
a single
proceeding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(3 10,000 For all 2007 10,000 (not
)(A) violations adjusted)
adjudicated in
a single
proceeding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(3 10,000 For each day the 2007 10,000 (not
)(B) violation is adjusted)
not corrected
after a 30-day
period
following
notification
until the
violation is
corrected
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(4 250,000 Per violation 2007 250,000
)(A)(i) (not
adjusted)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(4 1,000,000 For all 2007 1,000,000
)(A)(i) violations (not
adjudicated in adjusted)
a single
proceeding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(4 250,000 For the first 30- 2007 250,000
)(A)(ii day period (or (not
) any portion adjusted)
thereof) of
continued
violation
following
notification
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(4 1,000,000 For any 30-day 2007 1,000,000
)(A)(ii period, where (not
) the amount adjusted)
doubles for
every 30-day
period of
continued
violation after
the first 30-
day period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(f)(4 10,000,000 For all 2007 10,000,000
)(A)(ii violations (not
) adjudicated in adjusted)
a single
proceeding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 66815]]
333(g)(1 250,000 For the first 2007 250,000
) violation in (not
any 3-year adjusted)
period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
333(g)(1 500,000 For each 2007 500,000
) subsequent (not
violation in adjusted)
any 3-year
period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
335b(a) 275,000 Per violation 2008 300,000
for an
individual
------------------------------------------------------------------------
335b(a) 1,100,000 Per violation 2008 1,200,000
for ``any other
person''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
360pp(b) 1,100 Per violation 2008 1,100 (not
(1) per person adjusted)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
360pp(b) 330,000 For any related 2008 355,000
(1) series of
violations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
42 U.S.C.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
263b(h)( 11,000 Per violation 2008 11,000 (not
3) adjusted)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
300aa-28 110,000 Per occurrence 2008 120,000
(b)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: October 30, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-26864 Filed 11-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S