Avocados Grown in South Florida; Revisions to Grade and Container Requirements, 66715-66719 [E8-26855]
Download as PDF
66715
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 219
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 915
[Docket No. AMS–FV–08–0022; FV08–915–
1 FR]
Avocados Grown in South Florida;
Revisions to Grade and Container
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule changes the grade
and container requirements currently
prescribed under the marketing order
for avocados grown in South Florida
(order). The order regulates the handling
of avocados grown in South Florida and
is administered locally by the Avocado
Administrative Committee (Committee).
This change establishes a minimum
grade of a U.S. No. 2 for shipments
within the production area, requiring
these shipments to meet the same grade
as currently prescribed for shipments
leaving the production area. This rule
also makes changes to the container and
container marking requirements under
the order. These changes provide a
grade and a pack to meet consumer
demand and improve the identification
and traceability of avocado shipments.
DATES: Effective Date: November 13,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William G. Pimental, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen,
Regional Manager, Southeast Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA;
Telephone: (863) 324–3375, Fax: (863)
325–8793 or E-mail:
William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 915, as amended (7 CFR part 915),
regulating the handling of avocados
grown in South Florida, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule changes the grade and
container requirements currently
prescribed under the order. This rule
establishes a minimum grade of a U.S.
No. 2 for shipments within the
production area, requiring these
shipments to meet the same grade as
currently prescribed for shipments
leaving the production area. This final
rule also makes changes to the container
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and container marking requirements
established under the order. These
changes provide a grade and pack to
meet consumer demand and improve
the identification and traceability of
avocado shipments. These changes were
unanimously recommended by the
Committee during a number of meetings
over the past several months.
Section 915.51 of the order provides,
in part, the authority to issue
regulations establishing specific grade
and container requirements for
avocados. Section 915.52 of the order
provides the authority for the
modification, suspension or termination
of established regulations. The requisite
grade and container requirements are
specified under §§ 915.305 and 915.306.
These sections specify, in part, the
grade, container, and container marking
requirements for fresh shipments of
avocados grown in South Florida.
Standard containers refer to those
containers specifically authorized in
§ 915.305(a), which can be used for
shipments both inside and outside of
the production area. Nonstandard
containers refer to containers other than
those authorized in § 915.305(a), and
can only be used when shipping
avocados within the production area.
This final rule makes several changes
to the grade and container provisions
established under the order. This rule
establishes a minimum grade of a U.S.
No. 2 for all avocados sold within the
production area. It also requires that all
nonstandard containers used for
shipments within the production area
be one bushel in size and that these
containers be marked with the
registered handler number or the name
and address of the handler. This final
rule also requires that all avocados sold
be packed in new containers and that
the containers be marked with the grade
packed.
The first change establishes a
minimum grade of a U.S. No. 2 for all
avocados sold within the production
area. Prior to this change, only avocados
handled in standard containers had to
meet the grade requirement of a U.S. No.
2. Avocados sold within the production
area in nonstandard containers were not
required to meet a minimum grade. This
rule modifies § 915.306 so that all
avocados sold to the fresh market in the
production area, regardless of what type
of container, must meet the minimum
grade requirement of a U.S. No. 2.
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
66716
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
In 1992, Hurricane Andrew decimated
the Florida avocado production area
leaving both avocados and containers in
short supply. The industry
recommended that the grade
requirement be suspended for avocados
sold within the production area in
containers other than the standard
containers defined in § 915.305. This
change made more fruit available for
shipment and allowed handlers to pack
fruit in any obtainable container for
shipment within the production area.
The industry has since recovered from
the devastation caused by the hurricane.
Production for the 2007–08 season was
approximately 1.1 million bushels of
avocados, nearly matching the level of
production prior to Hurricane Andrew.
However, since the grade change made
following the hurricane, avocados
shipped within the production area in
nonstandard containers have not had to
meet any specific grade requirements.
At the time of Hurricane Andrew,
avocado shipments to production area
markets accounted for around 12
percent of total shipments. Since that
time, shipments to the production area
have nearly doubled. For the last five
seasons, shipments to the production
area have accounted for around 23
percent of total shipments, making the
production area one of the largest
markets for Florida avocados.
In discussing this issue, Committee
members stated that the absence of a
grade requirement has resulted in poor
quality avocados being offered for sale
inside the production area. The past few
seasons, the Committee office and
members of the industry have been
receiving an increasing number of
negative comments regarding the quality
of fruit sold in the production area.
These comments indicate there is an
increasing demand for higher quality
fruit within the production area.
Production area produce buyers and
brokers are looking for higher quality
fruit to meet the demands of production
area consumers. However, buyers have
expressed that without a minimum
grade requirement it is difficult to know
the quality of the avocados being
purchased. The level of quality received
varies between good and poor quality.
In an effort to address this issue, several
handlers have already begun packing to
meet a U.S. No. 2 for all their
production area shipments. Still, absent
a minimum grade requirement,
avocados that would not meet a U.S. No.
2 are still making it to production area
fresh market channels.
The Committee believes these poor
quality avocados have depressed prices
for better quality avocados and resulted
in lower overall returns to producers.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
Poor quality fruit normally returns the
lowest price when compared to quality
fruit. Because there is no minimum
grade requirement for nonstandard
containers, buyers are often unsure of
the level of quality they are purchasing.
This tends to drive the price offered
towards the lowest level for all
avocados. Further, when a consumer
purchases a poor piece of fruit, it can
affect repurchases, reducing demand.
Reduced demand also has a negative
effect on price.
The Committee believes eliminating
lower grade avocados from the
marketplace addresses consumer
demand, and helps ensure the industry
is providing all their customers with a
quality product. This encourages repeat
purchases, which helps increase returns
to producers and handlers. The
Committee agreed this change will
strengthen market conditions for
shipments within the production area.
Therefore, the Committee recommended
establishing a minimum grade of a U.S.
No. 2 for all avocados sold to markets
within the production area.
This rule also makes changes to the
container marking requirements
established under the order. Prior to this
action, the only container marking
requirement for nonstandard containers
was that the containers be marked with
a Federal State Inspection Service (FSIS)
lot stamp number, which is applied to
an adhesive tape seal affixed to the
container. While the lot stamp indicates
the date the product was inspected, it
does not provide any information that
would identify the handler. Some
handlers pay to have the adhesive tape
seal preprinted with their registered
handler number, and this number can
be used to identify the handler.
However, this is not the case for all
handlers.
The Committee is concerned that the
use of containers with no identifying
markings poses problems with the
positive identification and traceability
of avocados. Such containers are almost
impossible to trace back to the original
handler. In cases such as marketing
order compliance, it is important to be
able to identify the source of avocados
which are found to be in violation of
order requirements. Committee
members agreed that the ability to
positively identify product and trace its
origin is a necessity in today’s
marketplace. Proper handler
identification on a container is an
important part of this traceability.
In discussing this issue, the
Committee agreed that an adhesive tape
seal that is pre-printed with the
registered handler number is sufficient
to indicate the identity of the handler
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and to provide trace back. In cases
where the tape seal is not printed with
a registered handler number, the
Committee concurred that the name and
address of the handler should appear on
the container. The Committee believes
requiring all containers handled within
the production area to be marked with
a registered handler number or the name
and address of the handler improve the
identification and traceability of Florida
avocados.
The Committee also recommended
that all nonstandard containers be
marked with the grade packed. Prior to
this action, only standard containers
were required to be marked with the
grade and only from the first Monday
after July 15 until the first Monday after
January 1. In its discussion of this
change, the Committee agreed that for
nonstandard containers the grade
should be marked in letters at least 3
inches in height, rather than match the
1 inch requirement for standard
containers. Nonstandard containers tend
to be oversized, and as such, Committee
members believe the grade markings
need to be in larger letters, which is
more in scale with the larger containers.
Also, in the production area, avocados
are often displayed in the container in
which they were packed. Having
recommended that all avocados packed
be required to meet a U.S. No. 2 to
address the concerns of their customers,
Committee members thought it was
important that the grade be clearly
displayed on the container.
Further, the Committee also agreed it
was important to have the grade marked
on all containers throughout the season.
Therefore, the Committee recommended
that the language in the rules and
regulations stating that the grade only
needs to appear on standard containers
from the first Monday after July 15 until
the first Monday after January 1 be
removed, and that the grade packed be
required to appear on all standard and
nonstandard containers for the entire
shipping season.
This rule also makes two changes to
the container requirements specified
under § 915.305. Before this change,
there were no specific container
requirements for weight and dimension
for nonstandard containers, except that
handlers are prohibited from using 20
bushel plastic field bins to ship
avocados to markets inside the
production area. As such, many
different containers have been used for
shipments within the production area.
However, the vast majority of
nonstandard containers used in the
production area are new one bushel
containers or used one bushel
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
containers that were previously packed
with bananas.
The use of used banana boxes for
shipping avocados within the
production area increased dramatically
following Hurricane Andrew, when
containers were in short supply. Now,
with many of the avocados sold in the
production area displayed in the
container in which they were packed,
the Committee is concerned that the
practice of packing in used containers
has had a negative effect on the sale of
production area avocados. These
containers often have marks and stains
from their previous use, and can be in
poor condition. The Committee is
concerned that the condition of the
boxes is affecting the perception of the
avocados packed inside.
With production area shipments
accounting for 23 percent of total
shipments, the Committee believes it is
important to provide production area
markets with a quality pack. The
Committee believes requiring avocados
to be packed in new containers is more
sanitary, improves the appearance of the
overall pack, and could increase sales.
Consequently, the Committee
recommended that all containers used
to pack avocados be required to be new.
The other container change the
Committee recommended was that all
nonstandard containers be required to
be one bushel containers. Most
nonstandard containers in use are used
banana boxes or new containers with
dimensions similar to banana boxes.
These containers hold approximately
one bushel of avocados, which the
industry has found to be a useful size
for shipments within the production
area. Rather than permitting the use of
any size container within the
production area, the Committee believes
requiring the use of a one bushel
container provides some additional
uniformity to the pack.
With many handlers already utilizing
the one bushel container for production
area shipments, this sized container is
readily available throughout the
production area. Also, because all
containers to be used are now required
to be new, and handlers will be
purchasing containers, the Committee
believes this is a good time to establish
requirements for nonstandard
containers. Requiring all nonstandard
containers to be one bushel provides for
a uniform pack that is attractive to the
consumer. Therefore, the Committee
recommended that one bushel
containers be used for all shipments
within the production area.
These changes to the grade and
container requirements improve the
overall quality and pack, which meets
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
the demands of production area
customers. Responding to market
preferences is expected to benefit
producers and handlers of Florida
avocados. Further, requiring container
marking requirements improves the
identification and traceability of
production area avocados.
Consequently, the Committee
recommended the above changes to the
rules and regulations under the order.
This final rule also makes a minor
correction to § 915.306(a)(1). This
change removes language which only
pertained to the period November 2,
1992, through March 31, 1993. This
language is obsolete, and as such is no
longer necessary.
Section 8e of the Act provides that
when certain domestically produced
commodities, including avocados, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of that commodity must
meet the same or comparable grade,
size, quality, and maturity requirements.
This final rule does not change the
minimum grade of a U.S. No. 2
established for avocados shipped
outside the production area or the
maturity requirements established
under the order. This rule just requires
all avocados shipped within the
production area to meet the same
minimum grade of a U.S. No. 2, and
changes the container requirements
under the domestic handling regulation.
Consequently, no corresponding
changes to the import regulations are
required.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 35 handlers
of Florida avocados subject to regulation
under the order and approximately 300
producers of avocados in the production
area. Small agricultural service firms,
which include avocado handlers, are
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) as those whose
annual receipts are less than $7,000,000,
and small agricultural producers are
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66717
defined as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to Committee data, the
average price for Florida avocados
during the 2007–08 season was around
$12.00 per 55-pound bushel container,
and total shipments were near 1.1
million 55-pound bushels. Using the
average price and shipment information
provided by the Committee, the majority
of avocado handlers could be
considered small businesses under
SBA’s definition. In addition, based on
avocado production, producer prices,
and the total number of Florida avocado
producers, the average annual producer
revenue is less than $750,000.
Consequently, the majority of avocado
handlers and producers may be
classified as small entities.
This final rule revises the grade and
container requirements currently
prescribed under the order. This rule
establishes a minimum grade of a U.S.
No. 2 for shipments within the
production area, requiring these
shipments to meet the same grade as
currently prescribed for shipments
leaving the production area. It also
requires that all nonstandard containers
used for shipments within the
production area be one bushel in size
and that these containers be marked
with the registered handler number or
the name and address of the handler.
This final rule also requires that all
avocados sold be packed in new
containers and that the containers be
marked with the grade packed. These
changes provide a grade and pack to
meet consumer demand, which will
increase producer returns. This rule also
improves the identification and
traceability of production area avocados.
This rule revises §§ 915.305 and
915.306, which specify the requisite
grade and container requirements.
Authority for these actions is provided
in §§ 915.51 and 915.52 of the order.
These changes were unanimously
recommended by the Committee during
a number of meetings over the past
several months.
This final rule could result in some
additional costs. These potential costs
stem primarily from the application of
the minimum grade to nonstandard
containers, the new container marking
requirements, and the requirement that
all containers packed be new containers.
The grade requirement for
nonstandard containers could result in
the loss of some sales, as handlers will
no longer be able to sell fruit not
meeting a U.S. No. 2 inside the
production area. However, these losses
are expected to be minimal. Several
handlers have already started packing
their nonstandard containers to meet a
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
66718
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
U.S. No. 2 in response to consumer
demand. Further, the volume of fruit
failing to meet a U.S. No. 2 represents
only a small percentage of production
area shipments. The Committee
estimates lower grade avocados account
for only around 6 percent of production
area shipments. Last year, the industry
shipped nearly 264,000 55-pound
containers to production area markets.
Using these numbers, lower grade
avocados accounted for only 15,840 of
the containers shipped to the
production area last year, or 1 percent
of total industry shipments.
Consequently, this rule is not expected
to appreciably impact the total number
of shipments.
Further, the grade change is not
expected to result in perceptibly higher
inspection costs. Currently, all avocados
shipped in the production area must
meet maturity requirements regardless
of the container in which they are
packed. Consequently, all avocados are
already inspected, so any increase in
inspection costs will be minimal.
The costs associated with the
recommended changes in marking
requirements are also expected to be
nominal. Larger operations use
automated stamping, and already print
necessary information on standard
containers. A small reconfiguration
would allow them to meet this
requirement. Some operations order
their containers preprinted with the
needed information. As this rule
requires the use of new containers,
handlers will be purchasing containers.
The added cost of the additional
marking requirements for preprinted
containers should be minor. Smaller
operations stamp the containers by
hand. These operations will be able to
meet the new requirements with a onetime purchase of a grade stamp and a
name and address stamp.
This rule could also result in a slight
increase in cost for handlers that were
using used containers. However,
Committee members stated that plain,
one bushel containers are readily
available on the market at reasonable
prices. Also, dealers collect and sell the
used containers, so used containers are
not cost free. Further, the available
quantities of used containers are not
sufficient to handle all production area
shipments; so many new nonstandard
containers are already being purchased.
Consequently, the cost associated with
this change should also be minimal.
While this rule could result in some
additional costs, the changes are
expected to have a positive effect in the
marketplace. The production area is an
important market for the industry,
accounting for nearly 23 percent of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
shipments for the last five seasons. The
availability of poor quality avocados has
had a price depressing effect on the
market. Without change, there could be
a continued erosion of market
confidence and producer returns.
Requiring nonstandard containers to
meet the minimum grade of a U.S. No.
2 addresses consumer demand and
helps protect the production area
market from the price depressing effects
of poor quality avocados. In addition,
requiring all production area avocados
to be packed in new containers clearly
marked with the grade packed also
improves the overall avocado pack sold
in the production area. These new
requirements allow handlers to respond
to market preferences which are
expected to benefit producers and
handlers of Florida avocados.
Consumers also benefit as a result of the
higher quality pack available in the
marketplace. This rule also provides
improved traceability and identification
of Florida avocados. Consequently, the
benefits of this rule outweigh the
potential costs associated with these
changes. The costs and benefits of this
rule are not expected to be
disproportionately different for small or
large entities.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to these changes. One alternative
considered was to not make any changes
to the rules and regulations. However,
the Committee agreed making these
changes makes the industry more
responsive to consumer demand. It also
provides for better identification and
traceability of production area avocados.
Therefore, this alternative was rejected.
The Committee also considered the
alternative of requiring the grade to be
stamped on nonstandard containers in
letters and numbers at least 1 inch in
height as is required for standard
containers. However, with nonstandard
containers being larger in size and with
production area avocados sold in the
container, the Committee determined
that the grade should be clearly visible,
and that 1 inch was not large enough.
Therefore, this alternative was also
rejected.
This final rule revises the grade and
container requirements currently
prescribed under the avocado marketing
order. Accordingly, this action will not
impose any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large avocado handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this final rule. In addition, the
Committee’s meetings were widely
publicized throughout the avocado
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meetings and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the August 8, 2007,
September 9, 2007, January 9, 2008, and
February 13, 2008, meetings were public
meetings and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on
these issues.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on September 23, 2008 (73 FR
54740). Copies of the rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee
members and avocado handlers. Finally,
the rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 15-day comment
period ending October 8, 2008, was
provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov
/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplate
Data.do?template=TemplateN&page
=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at
the previously mentioned address in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already
shipping Florida avocadoes from the
2008–2009 crop. Further, handlers are
aware of this rule, which was
recommended at a public meeting. Also,
a 15-day comment period was provided
for in the proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 915 is amended as
follows:
Dated: November 5, 2008.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8–26855 Filed 11–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PART 915—AVOCADOS GROWN IN
SOUTH FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 915 continues to read as follows:
Agricultural Marketing Service
■
7 CFR Part 981
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
■
[Docket No. AMS–FV–08–0044; FV08–981–
1 FIR]
§ 915.305 Florida Avocado Container
Regulation 5.
Almonds Grown in California;
Relaxation of Incoming Quality Control
Requirements
2. Two new paragraphs (d) and (e) are
added to § 915.305 to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Avocados handled for the fresh
market in containers other than those
authorized under § 915.305(a) and
shipped to destinations within the
production area must be packed in 1bushel containers.
(e) All containers in which the
avocados are packed must be new, and
clean in appearance, without marks,
stains, or other evidence of previous
use.
3. In § 915.306, paragraphs (a)(1),
(a)(6) and (a)(7) are revised to read as
follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
§ 915.306 Florida avocado grade, pack,
and container marking regulation.
(a) * * *
(1) Such avocados grade at least U.S.
No. 2, except that avocados handled to
destinations within the production area
may be placed in containers with
avocados of dissimilar varietal
characteristics.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Such avocados when handled in
containers authorized under § 915.305,
except for those to export destinations,
are marked once with the grade of fruit
in letters and numbers at least 1 inch in
height on the top or one side of the
container, not to include the bottom.
(7) Such avocados when handled in
containers other than those authorized
under § 915.305(a) for shipment to
destinations within the production area
are marked once with the grade of fruit
in letters and numbers at least 3 inches
in height on the top or one side of the
container, not to include the bottom.
Each such container is also to be marked
at least once with either the registered
handler number assigned to the handler
at the time of certification as a registered
handler or with the name and address
of the handler.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule relaxing the incoming quality
control requirements prescribed under
the California almond marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of almonds grown in California and is
administered locally by the Almond
Board of California (Board). This rule
continues in effect the action that
changed the date by which almond
handlers must satisfy their inedible
disposition obligation from August 31 to
September 30 of each year. This change
provides handlers more flexibility in
their operations in light of larger
almond crops.
DATES: Effective Date: December 12,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),
regulating the handling of almonds
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66719
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect a
relaxation of the incoming quality
control requirements prescribed under
the order by changing the date by which
almond handlers must satisfy their
inedible disposition obligation from
August 31 to September 30 of each year.
This provides handlers more flexibility
in their operations in light of larger
almond crops.
Section 981.42 of the order provides
authority for a quality control program.
Paragraph (a) of this section requires
handlers to obtain incoming inspections
on almonds received from growers to
determine the percent of inedible
kernels in each lot of any variety.
Inedible kernels are poor quality kernels
or pieces of kernels as defined in
§ 981.408. A handler’s inedible
disposition obligation is based on the
percentage of inedible kernels in lots
received by such handler during a crop
year, as determined by the Federal-State
inspection service. Handlers must
satisfy their obligation by disposing of
inedible kernels and other almond
material in Board-accepted, non-human
consumption outlets like oil and animal
feed. Section 981.42(a) also provides
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 12, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66715-66719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26855]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 66715]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 915
[Docket No. AMS-FV-08-0022; FV08-915-1 FR]
Avocados Grown in South Florida; Revisions to Grade and Container
Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule changes the grade and container requirements
currently prescribed under the marketing order for avocados grown in
South Florida (order). The order regulates the handling of avocados
grown in South Florida and is administered locally by the Avocado
Administrative Committee (Committee). This change establishes a minimum
grade of a U.S. No. 2 for shipments within the production area,
requiring these shipments to meet the same grade as currently
prescribed for shipments leaving the production area. This rule also
makes changes to the container and container marking requirements under
the order. These changes provide a grade and a pack to meet consumer
demand and improve the identification and traceability of avocado
shipments.
DATES: Effective Date: November 13, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William G. Pimental, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Manager, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax:
(863) 325-8793 or E-mail: William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 915, as amended (7 CFR part 915), regulating the handling of
avocados grown in South Florida, hereinafter referred to as the
``order.'' The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule changes the grade and container requirements
currently prescribed under the order. This rule establishes a minimum
grade of a U.S. No. 2 for shipments within the production area,
requiring these shipments to meet the same grade as currently
prescribed for shipments leaving the production area. This final rule
also makes changes to the container and container marking requirements
established under the order. These changes provide a grade and pack to
meet consumer demand and improve the identification and traceability of
avocado shipments. These changes were unanimously recommended by the
Committee during a number of meetings over the past several months.
Section 915.51 of the order provides, in part, the authority to
issue regulations establishing specific grade and container
requirements for avocados. Section 915.52 of the order provides the
authority for the modification, suspension or termination of
established regulations. The requisite grade and container requirements
are specified under Sec. Sec. 915.305 and 915.306. These sections
specify, in part, the grade, container, and container marking
requirements for fresh shipments of avocados grown in South Florida.
Standard containers refer to those containers specifically
authorized in Sec. 915.305(a), which can be used for shipments both
inside and outside of the production area. Nonstandard containers refer
to containers other than those authorized in Sec. 915.305(a), and can
only be used when shipping avocados within the production area.
This final rule makes several changes to the grade and container
provisions established under the order. This rule establishes a minimum
grade of a U.S. No. 2 for all avocados sold within the production area.
It also requires that all nonstandard containers used for shipments
within the production area be one bushel in size and that these
containers be marked with the registered handler number or the name and
address of the handler. This final rule also requires that all avocados
sold be packed in new containers and that the containers be marked with
the grade packed.
The first change establishes a minimum grade of a U.S. No. 2 for
all avocados sold within the production area. Prior to this change,
only avocados handled in standard containers had to meet the grade
requirement of a U.S. No. 2. Avocados sold within the production area
in nonstandard containers were not required to meet a minimum grade.
This rule modifies Sec. 915.306 so that all avocados sold to the fresh
market in the production area, regardless of what type of container,
must meet the minimum grade requirement of a U.S. No. 2.
[[Page 66716]]
In 1992, Hurricane Andrew decimated the Florida avocado production
area leaving both avocados and containers in short supply. The industry
recommended that the grade requirement be suspended for avocados sold
within the production area in containers other than the standard
containers defined in Sec. 915.305. This change made more fruit
available for shipment and allowed handlers to pack fruit in any
obtainable container for shipment within the production area.
The industry has since recovered from the devastation caused by the
hurricane. Production for the 2007-08 season was approximately 1.1
million bushels of avocados, nearly matching the level of production
prior to Hurricane Andrew. However, since the grade change made
following the hurricane, avocados shipped within the production area in
nonstandard containers have not had to meet any specific grade
requirements.
At the time of Hurricane Andrew, avocado shipments to production
area markets accounted for around 12 percent of total shipments. Since
that time, shipments to the production area have nearly doubled. For
the last five seasons, shipments to the production area have accounted
for around 23 percent of total shipments, making the production area
one of the largest markets for Florida avocados.
In discussing this issue, Committee members stated that the absence
of a grade requirement has resulted in poor quality avocados being
offered for sale inside the production area. The past few seasons, the
Committee office and members of the industry have been receiving an
increasing number of negative comments regarding the quality of fruit
sold in the production area. These comments indicate there is an
increasing demand for higher quality fruit within the production area.
Production area produce buyers and brokers are looking for higher
quality fruit to meet the demands of production area consumers.
However, buyers have expressed that without a minimum grade requirement
it is difficult to know the quality of the avocados being purchased.
The level of quality received varies between good and poor quality. In
an effort to address this issue, several handlers have already begun
packing to meet a U.S. No. 2 for all their production area shipments.
Still, absent a minimum grade requirement, avocados that would not meet
a U.S. No. 2 are still making it to production area fresh market
channels.
The Committee believes these poor quality avocados have depressed
prices for better quality avocados and resulted in lower overall
returns to producers. Poor quality fruit normally returns the lowest
price when compared to quality fruit. Because there is no minimum grade
requirement for nonstandard containers, buyers are often unsure of the
level of quality they are purchasing. This tends to drive the price
offered towards the lowest level for all avocados. Further, when a
consumer purchases a poor piece of fruit, it can affect repurchases,
reducing demand. Reduced demand also has a negative effect on price.
The Committee believes eliminating lower grade avocados from the
marketplace addresses consumer demand, and helps ensure the industry is
providing all their customers with a quality product. This encourages
repeat purchases, which helps increase returns to producers and
handlers. The Committee agreed this change will strengthen market
conditions for shipments within the production area. Therefore, the
Committee recommended establishing a minimum grade of a U.S. No. 2 for
all avocados sold to markets within the production area.
This rule also makes changes to the container marking requirements
established under the order. Prior to this action, the only container
marking requirement for nonstandard containers was that the containers
be marked with a Federal State Inspection Service (FSIS) lot stamp
number, which is applied to an adhesive tape seal affixed to the
container. While the lot stamp indicates the date the product was
inspected, it does not provide any information that would identify the
handler. Some handlers pay to have the adhesive tape seal preprinted
with their registered handler number, and this number can be used to
identify the handler. However, this is not the case for all handlers.
The Committee is concerned that the use of containers with no
identifying markings poses problems with the positive identification
and traceability of avocados. Such containers are almost impossible to
trace back to the original handler. In cases such as marketing order
compliance, it is important to be able to identify the source of
avocados which are found to be in violation of order requirements.
Committee members agreed that the ability to positively identify
product and trace its origin is a necessity in today's marketplace.
Proper handler identification on a container is an important part of
this traceability.
In discussing this issue, the Committee agreed that an adhesive
tape seal that is pre-printed with the registered handler number is
sufficient to indicate the identity of the handler and to provide trace
back. In cases where the tape seal is not printed with a registered
handler number, the Committee concurred that the name and address of
the handler should appear on the container. The Committee believes
requiring all containers handled within the production area to be
marked with a registered handler number or the name and address of the
handler improve the identification and traceability of Florida
avocados.
The Committee also recommended that all nonstandard containers be
marked with the grade packed. Prior to this action, only standard
containers were required to be marked with the grade and only from the
first Monday after July 15 until the first Monday after January 1. In
its discussion of this change, the Committee agreed that for
nonstandard containers the grade should be marked in letters at least 3
inches in height, rather than match the 1 inch requirement for standard
containers. Nonstandard containers tend to be oversized, and as such,
Committee members believe the grade markings need to be in larger
letters, which is more in scale with the larger containers. Also, in
the production area, avocados are often displayed in the container in
which they were packed. Having recommended that all avocados packed be
required to meet a U.S. No. 2 to address the concerns of their
customers, Committee members thought it was important that the grade be
clearly displayed on the container.
Further, the Committee also agreed it was important to have the
grade marked on all containers throughout the season. Therefore, the
Committee recommended that the language in the rules and regulations
stating that the grade only needs to appear on standard containers from
the first Monday after July 15 until the first Monday after January 1
be removed, and that the grade packed be required to appear on all
standard and nonstandard containers for the entire shipping season.
This rule also makes two changes to the container requirements
specified under Sec. 915.305. Before this change, there were no
specific container requirements for weight and dimension for
nonstandard containers, except that handlers are prohibited from using
20 bushel plastic field bins to ship avocados to markets inside the
production area. As such, many different containers have been used for
shipments within the production area. However, the vast majority of
nonstandard containers used in the production area are new one bushel
containers or used one bushel
[[Page 66717]]
containers that were previously packed with bananas.
The use of used banana boxes for shipping avocados within the
production area increased dramatically following Hurricane Andrew, when
containers were in short supply. Now, with many of the avocados sold in
the production area displayed in the container in which they were
packed, the Committee is concerned that the practice of packing in used
containers has had a negative effect on the sale of production area
avocados. These containers often have marks and stains from their
previous use, and can be in poor condition. The Committee is concerned
that the condition of the boxes is affecting the perception of the
avocados packed inside.
With production area shipments accounting for 23 percent of total
shipments, the Committee believes it is important to provide production
area markets with a quality pack. The Committee believes requiring
avocados to be packed in new containers is more sanitary, improves the
appearance of the overall pack, and could increase sales. Consequently,
the Committee recommended that all containers used to pack avocados be
required to be new.
The other container change the Committee recommended was that all
nonstandard containers be required to be one bushel containers. Most
nonstandard containers in use are used banana boxes or new containers
with dimensions similar to banana boxes. These containers hold
approximately one bushel of avocados, which the industry has found to
be a useful size for shipments within the production area. Rather than
permitting the use of any size container within the production area,
the Committee believes requiring the use of a one bushel container
provides some additional uniformity to the pack.
With many handlers already utilizing the one bushel container for
production area shipments, this sized container is readily available
throughout the production area. Also, because all containers to be used
are now required to be new, and handlers will be purchasing containers,
the Committee believes this is a good time to establish requirements
for nonstandard containers. Requiring all nonstandard containers to be
one bushel provides for a uniform pack that is attractive to the
consumer. Therefore, the Committee recommended that one bushel
containers be used for all shipments within the production area.
These changes to the grade and container requirements improve the
overall quality and pack, which meets the demands of production area
customers. Responding to market preferences is expected to benefit
producers and handlers of Florida avocados. Further, requiring
container marking requirements improves the identification and
traceability of production area avocados. Consequently, the Committee
recommended the above changes to the rules and regulations under the
order.
This final rule also makes a minor correction to Sec.
915.306(a)(1). This change removes language which only pertained to the
period November 2, 1992, through March 31, 1993. This language is
obsolete, and as such is no longer necessary.
Section 8e of the Act provides that when certain domestically
produced commodities, including avocados, are regulated under a Federal
marketing order, imports of that commodity must meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements. This final
rule does not change the minimum grade of a U.S. No. 2 established for
avocados shipped outside the production area or the maturity
requirements established under the order. This rule just requires all
avocados shipped within the production area to meet the same minimum
grade of a U.S. No. 2, and changes the container requirements under the
domestic handling regulation. Consequently, no corresponding changes to
the import regulations are required.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 35 handlers of Florida avocados subject to
regulation under the order and approximately 300 producers of avocados
in the production area. Small agricultural service firms, which include
avocado handlers, are defined by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000, and
small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to Committee data, the average price for Florida avocados
during the 2007-08 season was around $12.00 per 55-pound bushel
container, and total shipments were near 1.1 million 55-pound bushels.
Using the average price and shipment information provided by the
Committee, the majority of avocado handlers could be considered small
businesses under SBA's definition. In addition, based on avocado
production, producer prices, and the total number of Florida avocado
producers, the average annual producer revenue is less than $750,000.
Consequently, the majority of avocado handlers and producers may be
classified as small entities.
This final rule revises the grade and container requirements
currently prescribed under the order. This rule establishes a minimum
grade of a U.S. No. 2 for shipments within the production area,
requiring these shipments to meet the same grade as currently
prescribed for shipments leaving the production area. It also requires
that all nonstandard containers used for shipments within the
production area be one bushel in size and that these containers be
marked with the registered handler number or the name and address of
the handler. This final rule also requires that all avocados sold be
packed in new containers and that the containers be marked with the
grade packed. These changes provide a grade and pack to meet consumer
demand, which will increase producer returns. This rule also improves
the identification and traceability of production area avocados. This
rule revises Sec. Sec. 915.305 and 915.306, which specify the
requisite grade and container requirements. Authority for these actions
is provided in Sec. Sec. 915.51 and 915.52 of the order. These changes
were unanimously recommended by the Committee during a number of
meetings over the past several months.
This final rule could result in some additional costs. These
potential costs stem primarily from the application of the minimum
grade to nonstandard containers, the new container marking
requirements, and the requirement that all containers packed be new
containers.
The grade requirement for nonstandard containers could result in
the loss of some sales, as handlers will no longer be able to sell
fruit not meeting a U.S. No. 2 inside the production area. However,
these losses are expected to be minimal. Several handlers have already
started packing their nonstandard containers to meet a
[[Page 66718]]
U.S. No. 2 in response to consumer demand. Further, the volume of fruit
failing to meet a U.S. No. 2 represents only a small percentage of
production area shipments. The Committee estimates lower grade avocados
account for only around 6 percent of production area shipments. Last
year, the industry shipped nearly 264,000 55-pound containers to
production area markets. Using these numbers, lower grade avocados
accounted for only 15,840 of the containers shipped to the production
area last year, or 1 percent of total industry shipments. Consequently,
this rule is not expected to appreciably impact the total number of
shipments.
Further, the grade change is not expected to result in perceptibly
higher inspection costs. Currently, all avocados shipped in the
production area must meet maturity requirements regardless of the
container in which they are packed. Consequently, all avocados are
already inspected, so any increase in inspection costs will be minimal.
The costs associated with the recommended changes in marking
requirements are also expected to be nominal. Larger operations use
automated stamping, and already print necessary information on standard
containers. A small reconfiguration would allow them to meet this
requirement. Some operations order their containers preprinted with the
needed information. As this rule requires the use of new containers,
handlers will be purchasing containers. The added cost of the
additional marking requirements for preprinted containers should be
minor. Smaller operations stamp the containers by hand. These
operations will be able to meet the new requirements with a one-time
purchase of a grade stamp and a name and address stamp.
This rule could also result in a slight increase in cost for
handlers that were using used containers. However, Committee members
stated that plain, one bushel containers are readily available on the
market at reasonable prices. Also, dealers collect and sell the used
containers, so used containers are not cost free. Further, the
available quantities of used containers are not sufficient to handle
all production area shipments; so many new nonstandard containers are
already being purchased. Consequently, the cost associated with this
change should also be minimal.
While this rule could result in some additional costs, the changes
are expected to have a positive effect in the marketplace. The
production area is an important market for the industry, accounting for
nearly 23 percent of shipments for the last five seasons. The
availability of poor quality avocados has had a price depressing effect
on the market. Without change, there could be a continued erosion of
market confidence and producer returns.
Requiring nonstandard containers to meet the minimum grade of a
U.S. No. 2 addresses consumer demand and helps protect the production
area market from the price depressing effects of poor quality avocados.
In addition, requiring all production area avocados to be packed in new
containers clearly marked with the grade packed also improves the
overall avocado pack sold in the production area. These new
requirements allow handlers to respond to market preferences which are
expected to benefit producers and handlers of Florida avocados.
Consumers also benefit as a result of the higher quality pack available
in the marketplace. This rule also provides improved traceability and
identification of Florida avocados. Consequently, the benefits of this
rule outweigh the potential costs associated with these changes. The
costs and benefits of this rule are not expected to be
disproportionately different for small or large entities.
The Committee discussed alternatives to these changes. One
alternative considered was to not make any changes to the rules and
regulations. However, the Committee agreed making these changes makes
the industry more responsive to consumer demand. It also provides for
better identification and traceability of production area avocados.
Therefore, this alternative was rejected. The Committee also considered
the alternative of requiring the grade to be stamped on nonstandard
containers in letters and numbers at least 1 inch in height as is
required for standard containers. However, with nonstandard containers
being larger in size and with production area avocados sold in the
container, the Committee determined that the grade should be clearly
visible, and that 1 inch was not large enough. Therefore, this
alternative was also rejected.
This final rule revises the grade and container requirements
currently prescribed under the avocado marketing order. Accordingly,
this action will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large avocado handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this final rule. In addition, the Committee's meetings
were widely publicized throughout the avocado industry and all
interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and participate
in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings,
the August 8, 2007, September 9, 2007, January 9, 2008, and February
13, 2008, meetings were public meetings and all entities, both large
and small, were able to express views on these issues.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on September 23, 2008 (73 FR 54740). Copies of the rule were
mailed or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and avocado
handlers. Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 15-day comment period
ending October 8, 2008, was provided to allow interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/
ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBus
inessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the
information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already shipping
Florida avocadoes from the 2008-2009 crop. Further, handlers are aware
of this rule, which was recommended at a public meeting. Also, a 15-day
comment period was provided for in the proposed rule.
[[Page 66719]]
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 915 is amended as
follows:
PART 915--AVOCADOS GROWN IN SOUTH FLORIDA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 915 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Two new paragraphs (d) and (e) are added to Sec. 915.305 to read as
follows:
Sec. 915.305 Florida Avocado Container Regulation 5.
* * * * *
(d) Avocados handled for the fresh market in containers other than
those authorized under Sec. 915.305(a) and shipped to destinations
within the production area must be packed in 1-bushel containers.
(e) All containers in which the avocados are packed must be new,
and clean in appearance, without marks, stains, or other evidence of
previous use.
3. In Sec. 915.306, paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(6) and (a)(7) are
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 915.306 Florida avocado grade, pack, and container marking
regulation.
(a) * * *
(1) Such avocados grade at least U.S. No. 2, except that avocados
handled to destinations within the production area may be placed in
containers with avocados of dissimilar varietal characteristics.
* * * * *
(6) Such avocados when handled in containers authorized under Sec.
915.305, except for those to export destinations, are marked once with
the grade of fruit in letters and numbers at least 1 inch in height on
the top or one side of the container, not to include the bottom.
(7) Such avocados when handled in containers other than those
authorized under Sec. 915.305(a) for shipment to destinations within
the production area are marked once with the grade of fruit in letters
and numbers at least 3 inches in height on the top or one side of the
container, not to include the bottom. Each such container is also to be
marked at least once with either the registered handler number assigned
to the handler at the time of certification as a registered handler or
with the name and address of the handler.
* * * * *
Dated: November 5, 2008.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8-26855 Filed 11-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P