Almonds Grown in California; Relaxation of Incoming Quality Control Requirements, 66719-66721 [E8-26851]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 915
Avocados, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 915 is amended as
follows:
Dated: November 5, 2008.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8–26855 Filed 11–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PART 915—AVOCADOS GROWN IN
SOUTH FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 915 continues to read as follows:
Agricultural Marketing Service
■
7 CFR Part 981
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
■
[Docket No. AMS–FV–08–0044; FV08–981–
1 FIR]
§ 915.305 Florida Avocado Container
Regulation 5.
Almonds Grown in California;
Relaxation of Incoming Quality Control
Requirements
2. Two new paragraphs (d) and (e) are
added to § 915.305 to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Avocados handled for the fresh
market in containers other than those
authorized under § 915.305(a) and
shipped to destinations within the
production area must be packed in 1bushel containers.
(e) All containers in which the
avocados are packed must be new, and
clean in appearance, without marks,
stains, or other evidence of previous
use.
3. In § 915.306, paragraphs (a)(1),
(a)(6) and (a)(7) are revised to read as
follows:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
§ 915.306 Florida avocado grade, pack,
and container marking regulation.
(a) * * *
(1) Such avocados grade at least U.S.
No. 2, except that avocados handled to
destinations within the production area
may be placed in containers with
avocados of dissimilar varietal
characteristics.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Such avocados when handled in
containers authorized under § 915.305,
except for those to export destinations,
are marked once with the grade of fruit
in letters and numbers at least 1 inch in
height on the top or one side of the
container, not to include the bottom.
(7) Such avocados when handled in
containers other than those authorized
under § 915.305(a) for shipment to
destinations within the production area
are marked once with the grade of fruit
in letters and numbers at least 3 inches
in height on the top or one side of the
container, not to include the bottom.
Each such container is also to be marked
at least once with either the registered
handler number assigned to the handler
at the time of certification as a registered
handler or with the name and address
of the handler.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule relaxing the incoming quality
control requirements prescribed under
the California almond marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of almonds grown in California and is
administered locally by the Almond
Board of California (Board). This rule
continues in effect the action that
changed the date by which almond
handlers must satisfy their inedible
disposition obligation from August 31 to
September 30 of each year. This change
provides handlers more flexibility in
their operations in light of larger
almond crops.
DATES: Effective Date: December 12,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional
Manager, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
981, as amended (7 CFR part 981),
regulating the handling of almonds
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66719
grown in California, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect a
relaxation of the incoming quality
control requirements prescribed under
the order by changing the date by which
almond handlers must satisfy their
inedible disposition obligation from
August 31 to September 30 of each year.
This provides handlers more flexibility
in their operations in light of larger
almond crops.
Section 981.42 of the order provides
authority for a quality control program.
Paragraph (a) of this section requires
handlers to obtain incoming inspections
on almonds received from growers to
determine the percent of inedible
kernels in each lot of any variety.
Inedible kernels are poor quality kernels
or pieces of kernels as defined in
§ 981.408. A handler’s inedible
disposition obligation is based on the
percentage of inedible kernels in lots
received by such handler during a crop
year, as determined by the Federal-State
inspection service. Handlers must
satisfy their obligation by disposing of
inedible kernels and other almond
material in Board-accepted, non-human
consumption outlets like oil and animal
feed. Section 981.42(a) also provides
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
66720
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
authority for the Board, with approval of
the Secretary, to establish rules and
regulations necessary to administer this
program.
Prior to publication of the interim
final rule, § 981.442(a)(5) of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations
specified that handlers must satisfy
their inedible disposition obligation no
later than August 31 succeeding the
crop year in which the obligation was
incurred. The crop year runs from
August 1 through July 31.
Since the mid-1990’s, almond crops
have doubled in size and are now over
1 billion pounds annually. Larger crops
have resulted in larger quantities of
inedible kernels. Between the 1993–94
and 1997–98 crop years, almond
production averaged about 570 million
pounds and inedible disposition
obligations averaged about 7 million
pounds annually. Between the 2003–04
and 2007–08 crop years, production
averaged about 1 billion pounds and
inedible disposition obligations
averaged about 10 million pounds
annually.
Many handlers now operate yearround and dispose of their inedible
kernels at one time after the end of the
crop year. With larger crops, it has
become difficult for handlers to meet
the August 31 inedible-disposition
deadline because of the larger volume of
inedible kernels that must be disposed
of under the program. Thus, the Board
recommended extending the deadline
from August 31 to September 30, giving
handlers an additional month to meet
their prior year’s obligation. This
provides handlers more flexibility in
their operations in light of larger
almond crops. The revision of
§ 981.442(a)(5) continues in effect,
accordingly.
This rule also continues in effect the
removal of obsolete language in
§ 981.442(a)(5). That section was
modified in 2006 to specify that at least
50 percent (increased from 25 percent)
of a handler’s crop year inedible
disposition obligation must be satisfied
with dispositions consisting of inedible
kernels. The 50 percent requirement
does not apply to handlers with total
inedible obligations of less than 1,000
pounds. However, that section still
contained the sentence referencing the
25 percent requirement. This rule
continues in effect both the removal of
that sentence and the revision of
§ 981.442(a)(5), accordingly.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 6,200
producers of almonds in the production
area and approximately 100 handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $6,500,000.
Data for the 2006–07 crop year
indicate that about 50 percent of the
handlers shipped under $6,500,000
worth of almonds. Dividing average
almond crop value for 2006–07 reported
by the National Agricultural Statistics
Service of $2.258 billion by the number
of producers (6,200) yields an average
annual producer revenue estimate of
about $364,190. Based on the foregoing,
about half of the handlers and a majority
of almond producers may be classified
as small entities.
This rule continues in effect both the
revision and relaxation of
§ 981.442(a)(5) of the order’s
administrative rules and regulations,
whereby handlers are permitted to
satisfy their inedible disposition
obligation no later than September 30 of
each year for obligations incurred in the
previous crop year, rather than the
previous deadline of August 31 of each
year. This rule also continues in effect
the removal of an obsolete sentence in
that section that referenced handler
dispositions containing 25 percent
inedible kernels. Authority for this
action is provided in § 981.42(a) of the
order.
Regarding the impact of this action on
affected entities, extending the
disposition deadline provides handlers
with additional flexibility in light of
larger almond crops. Handlers who
operate year round and dispose of their
inedible kernels at one time after the
end of the crop year have an additional
month to satisfy their prior year’s
inedible obligation.
The Board considered alternatives to
this action. The Board’s Food Quality
and Safety Committee (committee) met
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in September and November 2007 and
discussed the difficulties that handlers
were experiencing with meeting the
August 31 disposition deadline. The
committee recommended revising the
regulation to allow July dispositions to
be counted towards either the current
year or the following year’s obligation.
However, the intent of the inedible
program is to ensure that poor quality
almonds from the current crop year are
removed from the market. Thus,
allowing July dispositions to count
towards the following year’s obligation
would not meet the intent of the
program.
The committee deliberated on this
issue again in April 2008. The
committee considered the option of
extending the August 31 deadline to
September 30. The Board concurred
with this option at its meeting on April
2, 2008, and referred the issue back to
the committee for full discussion. The
committee met again on April 22, 2008,
to discuss the potential change.
Ultimately, the committee
recommended this option to the Board,
and the Board subsequently
unanimously recommended this change
at its May 2008 meeting.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
almond handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, as noted in
the initial regulatory flexibility analysis,
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Further, the committee and Board
meetings where this issue was discussed
were widely publicized throughout the
almond industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend the
meetings and encouraged to participate
in Board deliberations. Like all
committee and Board meetings, the
meetings held in September and
November 2007, and in April and May
2008 were all public meetings and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express their views on this issue.
An interim final rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on July 24, 2008. Copies of the
rule were provided to all Board
members and almond handlers by the
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Board’s staff. In addition, the rule was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. That rule provided for a
60-day comment period which ended on
September 22, 2008. No comments were
received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov
/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?
template=TemplateN&
page=MarketingOrders
SmallBusinessGuide. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Jay Guerber at the previously
mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Board’s recommendation, and other
information, it is found that finalizing
the interim final rule, without change,
as published in the Federal Register on
July 24, 2008 (73 FR 43056), will tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the
Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements,
Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 981—ALMONDS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 7 CFR part 981, which was
published at 73 FR 43056 on July 24,
2008, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
■
Dated: November 5, 2008.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8–26851 Filed 11–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 611
RIN 1901–AB25
Advanced Technology Vehicles
Manufacturing Incentive Program
Office of the Chief Financial
Officer, Department of Energy
(Department or DOE).
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for
comment.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Today’s interim final rule
establishes the Advanced Technology
Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive
Program authorized by section 136 of
the Energy Independence and Security
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
Act of 2007, as amended. Section 136
provides for grants and loans to eligible
automobile manufacturers and
component suppliers for projects that
reequip, expand, and establish
manufacturing facilities in the United
States to produce light-duty vehicles
and components for such vehicles,
which provide meaningful
improvements in fuel economy
performance beyond certain specified
levels. Section 136 also provides that
grants and loans may cover engineering
integration costs associated with such
projects. This interim final rule
establishes applicant eligibility and
project eligibility requirements for both
the grant and the loan program. Today’s
interim final rule also establishes the
application requirements and the
general terms for the loan program. At
present, Congress has appropriated
funds through the Consolidated
Security, Disaster Assistance, and
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009,
for only the loan program. As such, DOE
will be implementing the loan program
only at this time, though issuing rules
for both the grant and loan programs.
DATES: This interim final rule is
effective November 12, 2008.
Applications for a direct loan will be
reviewed by DOE in tranches. To be
eligible for the first tranche,
applications may be submitted or hand
delivered to the Postal Mail address
listed in ADDRESSES until December 31,
2008. The deadline for loan applications
for subsequent tranches of loans will be
the end of every calendar quarter
thereafter as funds and available loan
authority permit. Comments must be
received by DOE no later than December
12, 2008. If you submit information that
you believe to be exempt by law from
public disclosure, you should submit
one complete copy, as well as one copy
from which the information claimed to
be exempt by law from public
disclosure has been deleted. DOE is
responsible for the final determination
with regard to disclosure or
nondisclosure of the information and for
treating it accordingly under the DOE
Freedom of Information regulations at
10 CFR 1004.11.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: ATVMLoan@hq.doe.gov.
• Postal Mail: Advanced Technology
Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive
Program, U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66721
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Advanced
Technology Vehicles Manufacturing
Incentive Program, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number or Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) for this rulemaking.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lachlan Seward, Advanced Technology
Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive
Program, U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, 202–586–8146;
or Daniel Cohen, Assistant General
Counsel for Legislation and Regulatory
Law, Office of the General Counsel,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, 202–586–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction and Background
II. Discussion of Interim Final Rule
A. Applicant Eligibility for Grant and Loan
Programs—Statutory Criteria
B. Applicant Eligibility for Direct Loan
Program—Secretarial Determinations
C. Project Eligibility for Grant and Loan
Programs
D. Terms for Direct Loans
E. Application Process for Direct Loan
Program
F. Credit Subsidy Cost for Direct Loans
G. Project Costs
H. Assessment of Fees for Direct Loan
Program
I. Assessment of Applications and Program
Priorities
III. Application Submission
IV. Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969
C. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
D. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act
E. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
F. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
G. Review Under Executive Order 13132
H. Review Under Executive Order 12988
I. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
J. Review Under Executive Order 13211
K. Congressional Notification
L. Approval by the Office of the Secretary
of Energy
I. Introduction and Background
Section 136 of the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007
(‘‘EISA’’), enacted on December 19,
2007, Public Law 110–140, authorizes
the Secretary of Energy (‘‘Secretary’’) to
make grants and direct loans to eligible
applicants for projects that reequip,
expand, or establish manufacturing
facilities in the United States to produce
qualified advanced technology vehicles,
or qualifying components and also for
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 12, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66719-66721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26851]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 981
[Docket No. AMS-FV-08-0044; FV08-981-1 FIR]
Almonds Grown in California; Relaxation of Incoming Quality
Control Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim final rule relaxing the incoming
quality control requirements prescribed under the California almond
marketing order (order). The order regulates the handling of almonds
grown in California and is administered locally by the Almond Board of
California (Board). This rule continues in effect the action that
changed the date by which almond handlers must satisfy their inedible
disposition obligation from August 31 to September 30 of each year.
This change provides handlers more flexibility in their operations in
light of larger almond crops.
DATES: Effective Date: December 12, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906, or E-mail: Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of
almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.''
The order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the
``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect a relaxation of the incoming quality
control requirements prescribed under the order by changing the date by
which almond handlers must satisfy their inedible disposition
obligation from August 31 to September 30 of each year. This provides
handlers more flexibility in their operations in light of larger almond
crops.
Section 981.42 of the order provides authority for a quality
control program. Paragraph (a) of this section requires handlers to
obtain incoming inspections on almonds received from growers to
determine the percent of inedible kernels in each lot of any variety.
Inedible kernels are poor quality kernels or pieces of kernels as
defined in Sec. 981.408. A handler's inedible disposition obligation
is based on the percentage of inedible kernels in lots received by such
handler during a crop year, as determined by the Federal-State
inspection service. Handlers must satisfy their obligation by disposing
of inedible kernels and other almond material in Board-accepted, non-
human consumption outlets like oil and animal feed. Section 981.42(a)
also provides
[[Page 66720]]
authority for the Board, with approval of the Secretary, to establish
rules and regulations necessary to administer this program.
Prior to publication of the interim final rule, Sec. 981.442(a)(5)
of the order's administrative rules and regulations specified that
handlers must satisfy their inedible disposition obligation no later
than August 31 succeeding the crop year in which the obligation was
incurred. The crop year runs from August 1 through July 31.
Since the mid-1990's, almond crops have doubled in size and are now
over 1 billion pounds annually. Larger crops have resulted in larger
quantities of inedible kernels. Between the 1993-94 and 1997-98 crop
years, almond production averaged about 570 million pounds and inedible
disposition obligations averaged about 7 million pounds annually.
Between the 2003-04 and 2007-08 crop years, production averaged about 1
billion pounds and inedible disposition obligations averaged about 10
million pounds annually.
Many handlers now operate year-round and dispose of their inedible
kernels at one time after the end of the crop year. With larger crops,
it has become difficult for handlers to meet the August 31 inedible-
disposition deadline because of the larger volume of inedible kernels
that must be disposed of under the program. Thus, the Board recommended
extending the deadline from August 31 to September 30, giving handlers
an additional month to meet their prior year's obligation. This
provides handlers more flexibility in their operations in light of
larger almond crops. The revision of Sec. 981.442(a)(5) continues in
effect, accordingly.
This rule also continues in effect the removal of obsolete language
in Sec. 981.442(a)(5). That section was modified in 2006 to specify
that at least 50 percent (increased from 25 percent) of a handler's
crop year inedible disposition obligation must be satisfied with
dispositions consisting of inedible kernels. The 50 percent requirement
does not apply to handlers with total inedible obligations of less than
1,000 pounds. However, that section still contained the sentence
referencing the 25 percent requirement. This rule continues in effect
both the removal of that sentence and the revision of Sec.
981.442(a)(5), accordingly.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 6,200 producers of almonds in the
production area and approximately 100 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$6,500,000.
Data for the 2006-07 crop year indicate that about 50 percent of
the handlers shipped under $6,500,000 worth of almonds. Dividing
average almond crop value for 2006-07 reported by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service of $2.258 billion by the number of
producers (6,200) yields an average annual producer revenue estimate of
about $364,190. Based on the foregoing, about half of the handlers and
a majority of almond producers may be classified as small entities.
This rule continues in effect both the revision and relaxation of
Sec. 981.442(a)(5) of the order's administrative rules and
regulations, whereby handlers are permitted to satisfy their inedible
disposition obligation no later than September 30 of each year for
obligations incurred in the previous crop year, rather than the
previous deadline of August 31 of each year. This rule also continues
in effect the removal of an obsolete sentence in that section that
referenced handler dispositions containing 25 percent inedible kernels.
Authority for this action is provided in Sec. 981.42(a) of the order.
Regarding the impact of this action on affected entities, extending
the disposition deadline provides handlers with additional flexibility
in light of larger almond crops. Handlers who operate year round and
dispose of their inedible kernels at one time after the end of the crop
year have an additional month to satisfy their prior year's inedible
obligation.
The Board considered alternatives to this action. The Board's Food
Quality and Safety Committee (committee) met in September and November
2007 and discussed the difficulties that handlers were experiencing
with meeting the August 31 disposition deadline. The committee
recommended revising the regulation to allow July dispositions to be
counted towards either the current year or the following year's
obligation. However, the intent of the inedible program is to ensure
that poor quality almonds from the current crop year are removed from
the market. Thus, allowing July dispositions to count towards the
following year's obligation would not meet the intent of the program.
The committee deliberated on this issue again in April 2008. The
committee considered the option of extending the August 31 deadline to
September 30. The Board concurred with this option at its meeting on
April 2, 2008, and referred the issue back to the committee for full
discussion. The committee met again on April 22, 2008, to discuss the
potential change. Ultimately, the committee recommended this option to
the Board, and the Board subsequently unanimously recommended this
change at its May 2008 meeting.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large almond handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies. In addition, as noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Further, the committee and Board meetings where this issue was
discussed were widely publicized throughout the almond industry and all
interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and encouraged
to participate in Board deliberations. Like all committee and Board
meetings, the meetings held in September and November 2007, and in
April and May 2008 were all public meetings and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express their views on this issue.
An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the
Federal Register on July 24, 2008. Copies of the rule were provided to
all Board members and almond handlers by the
[[Page 66721]]
Board's staff. In addition, the rule was made available through the
Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. That rule
provided for a 60-day comment period which ended on September 22, 2008.
No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/
ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBus
inessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Board's recommendation, and other information, it is found that
finalizing the interim final rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register on July 24, 2008 (73 FR 43056), will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 981, which was
published at 73 FR 43056 on July 24, 2008, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
Dated: November 5, 2008.
David R. Shipman,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E8-26851 Filed 11-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P