Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200, A330-300, and A340-300 Series Airplanes, 66747-66750 [E8-25787]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) If the inspections were done prior to
the effective date of this AD: Within 30 days
after the effective date of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: Although
the MCAI allows further flight after cracks
are found during compliance with the
required action, this AD requires that you
repair the crack(s) before further flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive 2008–0066, dated March 31, 2008;
Airbus Service Bulletin A310–54–2032,
Revision 01, dated October 8, 2007; and
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310–54–
2036, Revision 02, dated September 28, 2007;
for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin
A310–54–2032, Revision 01, dated October 8,
2007; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin
A310–54–2036, including Appendix 01,
Revision 02, dated September 28, 2007; as
applicable; to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 33 33; Internet
https://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
9, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–25767 Filed 11–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
66747
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of December 17, 2008.
You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149.
Federal Aviation Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
14 CFR Part 39
Discussion
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0667; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–009–AD; Amendment
39–15717; AD 2008–22–20]
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on June 24, 2008 (73 FR 35603).
That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A330–200, A330–300, and A340–300
Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340–600,
damages were found in longitudinal doubler
at VTP [vertical tail plane] attachment cutout
between Frame (FR) 80 and FR86. This
damage occurred between 58341 and 72891
simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and
different design (e.g., doubler thickness) [of
the] A330–200/–300 and A340–300 aircraft
series, the damage assessment concluded
[there was] potential impact on [the airplanes
specified in the] applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
The unsafe condition is crack
propagation in the VTP attachment
cutout, which could reduce airplane
structural integrity in the tail section.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
December 17, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340–600,
damages were found in longitudinal doubler
at VTP [vertical tail plane] attachment cutout
between Frame (FR) 80 and FR86. This
damage occurred between 58341 and 72891
simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and
different design (e.g., doubler thickness) [of
the] A330–200/–300 and A340–300 aircraft
series, the damage assessment concluded
[there was] potential impact on [the airplanes
specified in the] applicability.
[T]o allow early detection of cracks, which
could [prevent] possible crack propagation
and consequently to maintain the structural
integrity of the upper shell structure between
FR80 and FR86, this Airworthiness Directive
(AD) mandates an inspection program [for
cracking] of this area using a high frequency
eddy current (HFEC) method, and a
modification to improve the upper shell
structure.
The unsafe condition is crack
propagation in the VTP attachment
cutout, which could reduce airplane
structural integrity in the tail section.
Corrective actions include doing eddy
current inspections for cracking of
certain fastener rows, and contacting
Airbus for repair instructions and
repairing. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received.
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
66748
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Request To Allow Flight With Cracks
Northwest Airlines (NWA) requests
that we reconsider eliminating the
provision for flight with certain cracks.
NWA states that the MCAI and Airbus
service bulletins (that were referenced
in the NPRM as appropriate sources of
service information) provide for flight
with certain cracks if follow-on
inspections are accomplished in
accordance with the service bulletin.
We do not concur. Our policy
specifies the requirement to repair
known cracks before further flight
(though we may make exceptions to this
policy in certain cases of unusual need,
as discussed below). This policy is
based on the fact that such damaged
airplanes do not conform to the FAAcertificated type design and, therefore,
are not airworthy until a properly
approved repair is made. While
recognizing that repair deferrals might
be necessary at times, our policy is
intended to minimize adverse human
factors relating to the lack of reliability
of long-term repetitive inspections,
which might reduce the safety of the
type-certificated design if such repair
deferrals are practiced routinely.
As noted above, we may make an
exception to this policy in certain cases,
if there is an unusual need for a
temporary deferral. Unusual needs
include such circumstances as
legitimate difficulty in acquiring parts to
accomplish repairs. Under such
conditions, we may allow a temporary
deferral of the repair, subject to a
stringent inspection program acceptable
to the FAA. We acknowledge that the
manufacturer has specified inspection
intervals that are intended to allow
continued operation with known cracks,
and to prevent the need for extensive
repairs. However, since we are not
aware of any unusual need for repair
deferral in regard to this AD, we have
not evaluated these inspection intervals.
Under the provisions of paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD, we will consider
requests for approval of an AMOC if
sufficient data are submitted to
substantiate that temporary deferral of
repair with follow-on inspections would
provide an acceptable level of safety.
We have not changed the AD in this
regard.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Actions Since NPRM Was Issued
Airbus has issued revisions to two
service bulletins referenced in the
NPRM as appropriate sources of service
information. Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletins A330–53–3168 and A340–53–
4174, both Revision 01, both dated
February 15, 2008, are essentially the
same as the original versions of those
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
service bulletins except for
clarifications, and no additional work is
required for airplanes modified per the
original issue. We have changed the
references in paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2)(i),
and (h) of this AD to include Revision
01 of those service bulletins, and added
paragraph (f)(4) to this AD to give credit
for actions performed according to the
original issues.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 26 products of U.S. registry. We
also estimate that it will take about 202
work-hours per product to comply with
the basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $19,020
per product. Where the service
information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we
have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be
$914,680, or $35,180 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
eddy current inspections for cracking of
certain fastener rows, and contacting Airbus
for repair instructions and repairing.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) For Airbus Model A330–300 and A340–
300 series airplanes, except Model A340–300
weight variant (WV) 027 airplanes: At the
applicable compliance time specified in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, perform a HFEC
inspection of the upper shell structure
between FR80 and FR86, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–53–3168
or A340–53–4174, both Revision 01, both
dated February 15, 2008, as applicable.
(i) If no crack is detected, repeat the
inspection thereafter within the intervals
specified in paragraph 1.E.(2) of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–53–3168
or A340–53–4174, both Revision 01, both
dated February 15, 2008, as applicable.
(ii) If any crack is detected during any
inspection required by this AD: Before next
flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions
and do applicable repairs.
(iii) Doing the modification of the upper
shell structure in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A330–53–3159 or A340–53–
4165, both dated September 19, 2007, as
applicable, ends the inspections required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(2) Do the actions required by paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD at the later of the compliance
times specified in paragraph (f)(2)(i) and
(f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within the compliance times specified
in paragraph 1.E.(2) of Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A330–53–3168 or A340–53–
4174, both Revision 01, both dated February
15, 2008, as applicable.
(ii) Within 3 months after the effective date
of this AD.
(3) At the applicable time specified in
paragraphs (f)(3)(i), (f)(3)(ii), and (f)(3)(iii) of
this AD or within 3 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later,
modify the upper shell structure between
FR80 and FR86 (including doing eddy
current inspections for cracking of certain
fastener rows and applicable corrective
actions) in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–53–3160,
dated July 9, 2007; or Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A340–53–4172, dated July
10, 2007; as applicable. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(i) For Model A330–200 airplanes, WV 020
through WV 027: Prior to the accumulation
of 13,500 total flight cycles.
(ii) For Model A330–200 airplanes, WV
050 through WV 055: Prior to the
accumulation of 10,700 total flight cycles or
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2008–22–20 Airbus: Amendment 39–15717.
Docket No. FAA–2008–0667; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–009–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective December 17, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330–
200, A330–300, and A340–300 series
airplanes; certificated in any category; all
certified models, all serial numbers; on
which Airbus Modification 44205 has been
embodied in production, except those on
which Airbus Modification 52974 or 53223
has been embodied in production.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340–600,
damages were found in longitudinal doubler
at VTP [vertical tail plane] attachment cutout
between Frame (FR) 80 and FR86. This
damage occurred between 58341 and 72891
simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and
different design (e.g., doubler thickness) [of
the] A330–200/–300 and A340–300 aircraft
series, the damage assessment concluded
[there was] potential impact on [the airplanes
specified in the] applicability.
[T]o allow early detection of cracks, which
could [prevent] possible crack propagation
and consequently to maintain the structural
integrity of the upper shell structure between
FR80 and FR86, this Airworthiness Directive
(AD) mandates an inspection program [for
cracking] of this area using a high frequency
eddy current (HFEC) method, and a
modification to improve the upper shell
structure.
The unsafe condition is crack propagation in
the VTP attachment cutout, which could
reduce airplane structural integrity in the tail
section. Corrective actions include doing
66749
59,300 total flight hours, whichever occurs
first.
(iii) For Model A340–300 airplanes, WV
027: Prior to the accumulation of 14,200 total
flight cycles.
(4) Inspections accomplished before the
effective date of this AD according to Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletins A330–53–3168
and A340–53–4174, both dated September
19, 2007, as applicable, are considered
acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions specified in this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: Although
the MCAI allows further flight after cracks
are found during compliance with the
required action, this AD requires that you
repair the crack(s) before further flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–1138; fax (425) 227–1149. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2007–
0284, dated November 12, 2007, and the
service bulletins specified in Table 1 of this
AD, for related information.
TABLE 1—SERVICE INFORMATION
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Airbus service information
Revision
Date
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–53–3160 ....................................................................................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–53–3168 ....................................................................................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–53–4172 ....................................................................................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–53–4174 ....................................................................................
Service Bulletin A330–53–3159 ......................................................................................................
Original ......................
01 ..............................
Original ......................
01 ..............................
Original ......................
July 9, 2007.
February 15, 2008.
July 10, 2007.
February 15, 2008.
September 19, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
66750
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 12, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—SERVICE INFORMATION—Continued
Airbus service information
Revision
Date
Service Bulletin A340–53–4165 ......................................................................................................
Original ......................
September 19, 2007.
Material Incorporated by Reference
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point
Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 33 33; Internet
https://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
(i) You must use the service information
specified in Table 2 of this AD to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
TABLE 2—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Airbus service information
Revision
Date
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–53–3160 ....................................................................................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–53–3168 ....................................................................................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–53–4172 ....................................................................................
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–53–4174 ....................................................................................
Service Bulletin A330–53–3159 ......................................................................................................
Service Bulletin A340–53–4165 ......................................................................................................
Original ......................
01 ..............................
Original ......................
01 ..............................
Original ......................
Original ......................
July 9, 2007.
February 15, 2008.
July 10, 2007.
February 15, 2008.
September 19, 2007.
September 19, 2007.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
20, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–25787 Filed 11–10–08; 8:45 am]
• FAX: 301–827–6870.
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For
paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions]:
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
To ensure more timely processing of
comments, FDA is no longer accepting
comments submitted to the agency by email. FDA encourages you to continue
to submit electronic comments by using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal or the
agency Web site, as described
previously, in the ADDRESSES portion of
this document under Electronic
Submissions.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0561 for this
rulemaking. All comments received may
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
additional information on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Comments’’ heading
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number(s), found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Interested
persons may submit to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
written or electronic comments
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0561]
Maximum Civil Money Penalty
Amounts and Compliance With the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is issuing a new
regulation to adjust for inflation the
maximum civil money penalty amounts
for the various civil money penalty
authorities within our jurisdiction. We
are taking this action to comply with the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990 (FCPIAA), as
amended. The last adjustment was
published in the Federal Register of
July 20, 2004 (69 FR 43299), and the
FCPIAA requires Federal agencies to
adjust their civil money penalties at
least once every 4 years. This rule does
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:26 Nov 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
not adjust the civil money provisions
enacted by the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA). We are using direct final
rulemaking for this action because the
agency expects that there will be no
significant adverse comment on the
rule. In the proposed rule section of this
issue of the Federal Register, we are
concurrently proposing and soliciting
comments on this rule. If significant
adverse comments are received, we will
withdraw this final rule and address the
comments in a subsequent final rule.
FDA will not provide additional
opportunity for comment.
DATES: This rule is effective March 27,
2009, without further notice, unless
FDA receives significant adverse
comment by January 26, 2009. If we
receive no timely significant adverse
comments, we will publish a document
in the Federal Register before February
25, 2009, confirming the effective date
of the direct final rule. If we receive any
timely significant adverse comments,
we will publish a document in the
Federal Register withdrawing this
direct final rule before March 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FDA–2008–N–
0561, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
Submit written submissions in the
following ways:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM
12NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 12, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66747-66750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25787]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0667; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-009-AD;
Amendment 39-15717; AD 2008-22-20]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200, A330-300, and
A340-300 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340-600, damages were found
in longitudinal doubler at VTP [vertical tail plane] attachment
cutout between Frame (FR) 80 and FR86. This damage occurred between
58341 and 72891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and different design
(e.g., doubler thickness) [of the] A330-200/-300 and A340-300
aircraft series, the damage assessment concluded [there was]
potential impact on [the airplanes specified in the] applicability.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is crack propagation in the VTP attachment cutout,
which could reduce airplane structural integrity in the tail section.
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective December 17, 2008.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 17,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 24, 2008 (73 FR
35603). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340-600, damages were found
in longitudinal doubler at VTP [vertical tail plane] attachment
cutout between Frame (FR) 80 and FR86. This damage occurred between
58341 and 72891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and different design
(e.g., doubler thickness) [of the] A330-200/-300 and A340-300
aircraft series, the damage assessment concluded [there was]
potential impact on [the airplanes specified in the] applicability.
[T]o allow early detection of cracks, which could [prevent]
possible crack propagation and consequently to maintain the
structural integrity of the upper shell structure between FR80 and
FR86, this Airworthiness Directive (AD) mandates an inspection
program [for cracking] of this area using a high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) method, and a modification to improve the upper shell
structure.
The unsafe condition is crack propagation in the VTP attachment cutout,
which could reduce airplane structural integrity in the tail section.
Corrective actions include doing eddy current inspections for cracking
of certain fastener rows, and contacting Airbus for repair instructions
and repairing. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI
in the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received.
[[Page 66748]]
Request To Allow Flight With Cracks
Northwest Airlines (NWA) requests that we reconsider eliminating
the provision for flight with certain cracks. NWA states that the MCAI
and Airbus service bulletins (that were referenced in the NPRM as
appropriate sources of service information) provide for flight with
certain cracks if follow-on inspections are accomplished in accordance
with the service bulletin.
We do not concur. Our policy specifies the requirement to repair
known cracks before further flight (though we may make exceptions to
this policy in certain cases of unusual need, as discussed below). This
policy is based on the fact that such damaged airplanes do not conform
to the FAA-certificated type design and, therefore, are not airworthy
until a properly approved repair is made. While recognizing that repair
deferrals might be necessary at times, our policy is intended to
minimize adverse human factors relating to the lack of reliability of
long-term repetitive inspections, which might reduce the safety of the
type-certificated design if such repair deferrals are practiced
routinely.
As noted above, we may make an exception to this policy in certain
cases, if there is an unusual need for a temporary deferral. Unusual
needs include such circumstances as legitimate difficulty in acquiring
parts to accomplish repairs. Under such conditions, we may allow a
temporary deferral of the repair, subject to a stringent inspection
program acceptable to the FAA. We acknowledge that the manufacturer has
specified inspection intervals that are intended to allow continued
operation with known cracks, and to prevent the need for extensive
repairs. However, since we are not aware of any unusual need for repair
deferral in regard to this AD, we have not evaluated these inspection
intervals.
Under the provisions of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, we will
consider requests for approval of an AMOC if sufficient data are
submitted to substantiate that temporary deferral of repair with
follow-on inspections would provide an acceptable level of safety. We
have not changed the AD in this regard.
Actions Since NPRM Was Issued
Airbus has issued revisions to two service bulletins referenced in
the NPRM as appropriate sources of service information. Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletins A330-53-3168 and A340-53-4174, both
Revision 01, both dated February 15, 2008, are essentially the same as
the original versions of those service bulletins except for
clarifications, and no additional work is required for airplanes
modified per the original issue. We have changed the references in
paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2)(i), and (h) of this AD to include Revision 01
of those service bulletins, and added paragraph (f)(4) to this AD to
give credit for actions performed according to the original issues.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 26 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 202 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $19,020
per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $914,680, or $35,180 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
[[Page 66749]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-22-20 Airbus: Amendment 39-15717. Docket No. FAA-2008-0667;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-009-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December
17, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-200, A330-300, and
A340-300 series airplanes; certificated in any category; all
certified models, all serial numbers; on which Airbus Modification
44205 has been embodied in production, except those on which Airbus
Modification 52974 or 53223 has been embodied in production.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During fatigue tests (EF3) on the A340-600, damages were found
in longitudinal doubler at VTP [vertical tail plane] attachment
cutout between Frame (FR) 80 and FR86. This damage occurred between
58341 and 72891 simulated Flight Cycles (FC).
Due to the higher Design Service Goal and different design
(e.g., doubler thickness) [of the] A330-200/-300 and A340-300
aircraft series, the damage assessment concluded [there was]
potential impact on [the airplanes specified in the] applicability.
[T]o allow early detection of cracks, which could [prevent]
possible crack propagation and consequently to maintain the
structural integrity of the upper shell structure between FR80 and
FR86, this Airworthiness Directive (AD) mandates an inspection
program [for cracking] of this area using a high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) method, and a modification to improve the upper shell
structure.
The unsafe condition is crack propagation in the VTP attachment
cutout, which could reduce airplane structural integrity in the tail
section. Corrective actions include doing eddy current inspections
for cracking of certain fastener rows, and contacting Airbus for
repair instructions and repairing.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) For Airbus Model A330-300 and A340-300 series airplanes,
except Model A340-300 weight variant (WV) 027 airplanes: At the
applicable compliance time specified in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD,
perform a HFEC inspection of the upper shell structure between FR80
and FR86, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3168 or A340-53-4174, both
Revision 01, both dated February 15, 2008, as applicable.
(i) If no crack is detected, repeat the inspection thereafter
within the intervals specified in paragraph 1.E.(2) of Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3168 or A340-53-4174, both
Revision 01, both dated February 15, 2008, as applicable.
(ii) If any crack is detected during any inspection required by
this AD: Before next flight, contact Airbus for repair instructions
and do applicable repairs.
(iii) Doing the modification of the upper shell structure in
accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3159 or A340-53-
4165, both dated September 19, 2007, as applicable, ends the
inspections required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
(2) Do the actions required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD at
the later of the compliance times specified in paragraph (f)(2)(i)
and (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(i) Within the compliance times specified in paragraph 1.E.(2)
of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3168 or A340-53-4174,
both Revision 01, both dated February 15, 2008, as applicable.
(ii) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD.
(3) At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (f)(3)(i),
(f)(3)(ii), and (f)(3)(iii) of this AD or within 3 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, modify the upper
shell structure between FR80 and FR86 (including doing eddy current
inspections for cracking of certain fastener rows and applicable
corrective actions) in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53-3160,
dated July 9, 2007; or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-53-
4172, dated July 10, 2007; as applicable. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(i) For Model A330-200 airplanes, WV 020 through WV 027: Prior
to the accumulation of 13,500 total flight cycles.
(ii) For Model A330-200 airplanes, WV 050 through WV 055: Prior
to the accumulation of 10,700 total flight cycles or 59,300 total
flight hours, whichever occurs first.
(iii) For Model A340-300 airplanes, WV 027: Prior to the
accumulation of 14,200 total flight cycles.
(4) Inspections accomplished before the effective date of this
AD according to Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletins A330-53-3168 and
A340-53-4174, both dated September 19, 2007, as applicable, are
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions
specified in this AD.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: Although the MCAI allows further flight after cracks are
found during compliance with the required action, this AD requires
that you repair the crack(s) before further flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested, using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1138; fax (425) 227-1149.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2007-0284, dated November 12, 2007, and the service
bulletins specified in Table 1 of this AD, for related information.
Table 1--Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service information Revision Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53- Original........................... July 9, 2007.
3160.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53- 01................................. February 15, 2008.
3168.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-53- Original........................... July 10, 2007.
4172.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-53- 01................................. February 15, 2008.
4174.
Service Bulletin A330-53-3159......... Original........................... September 19, 2007.
[[Page 66750]]
Service Bulletin A340-53-4165......... Original........................... September 19, 2007.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use the service information specified in Table 2 of
this AD to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 33 33; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Table 2--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus service information Revision Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53- Original........................... July 9, 2007.
3160.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-53- 01................................. February 15, 2008.
3168.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-53- Original........................... July 10, 2007.
4172.
Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-53- 01................................. February 15, 2008.
4174.
Service Bulletin A330-53-3159......... Original........................... September 19, 2007.
Service Bulletin A340-53-4165......... Original........................... September 19, 2007.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 20, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-25787 Filed 11-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P