Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Decision and Order Granting a Waiver to LG Electronics From the Department of Energy Residential Clothes Dryer Test Procedures [Case No. CD-002], 66641-66642 [E8-26692]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 218 / Monday, November 10, 2008 / Notices
[FR Doc. E8–26146 Filed 11–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–KF–P
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 27,
2008.
John F. Mizroch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Decision and Order
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
In the Matter of: LG Electronics Inc.
(LG). (Case No. CD–002)
Background
[Case No. CD–002]
Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products: Decision and
Order Granting a Waiver to LG
Electronics From the Department of
Energy Residential Clothes Dryer Test
Procedures [Case No. CD–002]
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Decision and Order.
SUMMARY: This notice publishes the
Department of Energy’s Decision and
Order in Case No. CD–002, which grants
to LG Electronics Inc. (LG) a waiver
from the existing Department of Energy
(DOE) residential clothes dryer test
procedure for its product line of
DLEC733W ventless clothes dryers,
because the existing test procedure only
applies to clothes dryers that are vented.
This Decision and Order is
effective November 10, 2008.
DATES:
Dr.
Michael G. Raymond, U.S. Department
of Energy, Building Technologies
Program, Mailstop EE–2J, Forrestal
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–9611. E-mail:
Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Francine Pinto or Mr. Eric Stas,
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the
General Counsel, Mailstop GC–72,
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585–
0103. Telephone: (202) 586–9507. Email: Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov or
Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
In
accordance with 10 CFR 430.27(l), DOE
gives notice of the issuance of its
Decision and Order as set forth below.
In the Decision and Order, DOE grants
to LG a waiver from the existing
residential clothes dryer test procedure
under 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
Appendix D, for its ventless clothes
dryer (model DLEC733W), which does
not have an outside exhaust.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Nov 07, 2008
Jkt 217001
Title III of the Energy Policy and
Conservation Act (EPCA) sets forth a
variety of provisions concerning energy
efficiency. Part A of Title III provides for
the ‘‘Energy Conservation Program for
Consumer Products Other Than
Automobiles.’’ 1 (42 U.S.C. 6291–6309)
Part A includes definitions, test
procedures, labeling provisions, energy
conservation standards, and the
authority to require information and
reports from manufacturers. Further,
Part A authorizes the Secretary of
Energy (the Secretary) to prescribe test
procedures that are reasonably designed
to produce results which measure
energy efficiency, energy use, or
estimated operating costs, and that are
not unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) Relevant to the
current Petition for Waiver, the test
procedure for residential clothes dryers
is set forth in 10 CFR part 430, subpart
B, Appendix D, ‘‘Uniform Test Method
for Measuring the Energy Consumption
of Clothes Dryers.’’
In addition, DOE’s regulations contain
provisions allowing a person to seek a
waiver from the test procedure
requirements for covered products when
the petitioner’s basic model contains
one or more design characteristics that
prevent testing of the basic model
according to the prescribed test
procedure, or when the prescribed test
procedure may evaluate the basic model
in a manner so unrepresentative of its
true energy consumption characteristics
as to provide materially inaccurate
comparative data. 10 CFR 430.27(a)(1).
Petitioners must include in their
petition any alternate test procedures
known to evaluate the basic model in a
manner representative of its energy
consumption. 10 CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iii).
The Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy (the
Assistant Secretary) may grant the
waiver subject to conditions, including
adherence to alternate test procedures.
10 CFR 430.27(l). Waivers generally
terminate on the effective date of a final
rule which prescribes amended test
procedures appropriate to the model
1 This part was originally titled Part B; however,
it was redesignated Part A, after Part B of Title III
was repealed by Public Law 109–58.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66641
series manufactured by the petitioner,
thereby eliminating any need for the
continuation of the waiver. 10 CFR
430.27(m).
The waiver process contained in
DOE’s regulations also allows any
interested person who has submitted a
Petition for Waiver to file an
Application for Interim Waiver of the
applicable test procedure requirements.
10 CFR 430.27(a)(2). The Assistant
Secretary will grant an Interim Waiver
request if it is determined that the
applicant will experience economic
hardship if the Interim Waiver is
denied, if it appears likely that the
Petition for Waiver will be granted, and/
or the Assistant Secretary determines
that it would be desirable for public
policy reasons to grant immediate relief
pending a determination on the Petition
for Waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(g). An
Interim Waiver remains in effect for a
period of 180 days or until DOE issues
its determination on the Petition for
Waiver, whichever occurs first, and may
be extended by DOE for 180 days, if
necessary. 10 CFR 430.27(h).
On November 14, 2005, LG filed an
Application for Interim Waiver and
Petition for Waiver from the test
procedures for energy consumption
which are applicable to its product line
of ventless 2 clothes dryers, under basic
model number DLEC733W. As noted
above, the relevant test procedures are
contained in 10 CFR part 430, subpart
B, Appendix D. LG seeks a waiver from
the test procedures for this product line
because, LG asserts, the current clothes
dryer test procedures only apply to
vented clothes dryers and require the
use of an exhaust restrictor to simulate
the backpressure effects of a vent tube
in an installed condition. According to
LG, its line of condenser (ventless)
clothes dryers does not have exhaust
vents and does not vent exhaust air to
the outside as do conventional (vented)
dryers, and because the test procedures
do not provide a definition or mention
of a ventless clothes dryer, its products
cannot be tested according to 10 CFR
part 430, subpart B, Appendix D.
On August 23, 2006, DOE published
LG’s Petition for Waiver and denied the
Application for Interim Waiver. 71 FR
49437. In that notice, DOE proposed and
requested comment on an alternate test
procedure for testing ventless clothes
dryer products, as discussed below. In
denying LG’s request for an Interim
Waiver, DOE questioned whether it
2 In LG’s Petition for Waiver, the terms
‘‘condenser’’ or ‘‘condensing’’ were used instead of
‘‘ventless’’ to describe this product. No change in
meaning is intended by this substitution, which
was made to be consistent with other DOE
documents.
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
66642
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 218 / Monday, November 10, 2008 / Notices
would ultimately grant a waiver to LG,
given the proposed alternate test
procedures which may permit testing of
ventless dryers and new technologies
which could potentially improve the
energy efficiency of such products. DOE
received comments on the LG Petition
from Whirlpool Corporation
(Whirlpool), the Association of Home
Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM), and
Miele, Inc. (Miele).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Assertions and Determinations
LG’s Petition for Waiver
On November 14, 2005, LG submitted
a Petition for Waiver and an Application
for Interim Waiver from the test
procedures at 10 CFR part 430, subpart
B, Appendix D, which are applicable to
residential electric clothes dryers. LG
did not include an alternate test
procedure with its petition, stating that
it knew of no other test procedure to
rate its ventless dryer products.
Accordingly, as part of the August 23,
2006 Federal Register notice, DOE
proposed a modified test procedure to
accompany the LG Petition for Waiver,
which was based on the existing test
procedures for clothes dryers under 10
CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix D,
but without a requirement to use an
exhaust restrictor. No other changes
were made to the test procedure.
After reviewing the public comments
received on this matter, DOE notes that
Whirlpool agreed with DOE’s modified
test procedure, but recommended
clarifications to DOE’s proposed
revisions of the definitions pertaining to
clothes dryers (i.e., sections 1.14 and
1.15 of the DOE clothes dryer test
procedure). The commenting
stakeholders (AHAM, Miele, and
Whirlpool) all stated that ventless
clothes dryers cannot meet the DOE
efficiency standard, so accordingly, they
recommended a separate product class
and efficiency standard for ventless
clothes dryers.
In response to the assertions of the
industry commenters, DOE has not been
able to find data as to whether ventless
clothes dryers can or cannot meet the
existing DOE clothes dryer energy
conservation standard. Nevertheless,
DOE acknowledges the commenters’
experience in working with this type of
product. However, if this type of clothes
dryer is indeed unable to meet the
standard, DOE cannot, in a waiver,
establish a separate product class3 and
associated efficiency level. Instead, such
actions must be taken in the context of
a standards rulemaking. Such a
3 Product classes are established to recognize
distinct categories of a covered product that may
necessitate different efficiency standard levels.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Nov 07, 2008
Jkt 217001
standards rulemaking was initiated with
a Framework Document public meeting
held on October 24, 2007. A Final Rule
prescribing new efficiency standards for
residential clothes dryers is expected in
2011.
It is further noted that on February 17,
1995, DOE published in the Federal
Register a Decision and Order granting
a waiver to Miele for a very similar
ventless clothes dryer. 60 FR 9330.
Miele’s waiver did not require Miele to
test its ventless clothes dryers, and in
that document, DOE stated that the
energy conservation standards for
clothes dryers did not apply to Miele’s
ventless clothes dryers. Despite the
passage of time, LG’s situation is
analogous to that of Miele with regard
to ventless clothes dryers. DOE has
determined that although it would be
feasible to provide LG with an alternate
test procedure, as proposed, it is likely,
as all the commenters agreed, that the
problem is more fundamental than one
limited to a needed test procedure
change; instead, in spite of
technological developments, it is
expected that ventless clothes dryers
would not meet the DOE energy
conservation standard, and that a
separate clothes dryer class (with a
separate efficiency standard) would
have to be established for ventless
clothes dryers. Otherwise, a type of
product with unique consumer utility
could be driven from the market.
However, the establishment of product
classes cannot be done in a waiver, but
only in a standards rulemaking.
Therefore, inasmuch as ventless clothes
dryers are likely unable to meet the DOE
clothes dryer efficiency standard, and
there is a long-standing waiver granted
to Miele, DOE has decided to grant a
similar waiver to LG from testing of its
ventless clothes dryers. Therefore, DOE
is not making any modifications to its
existing clothes dryer test procedure at
this time, and it will not require LG to
test its specified ventless clothes dryer
models under that procedure.
Consultations With Other Agencies
DOE consulted with Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) staff concerning the
LG petition. The FTC staff did not have
any objections to granting a waiver to
LG. DOE also consulted with the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) concerning the LG
petition, and NIST likewise did not
have any objections to granting a waiver
to LG.
Conclusion
After careful consideration of all the
material that was submitted by LG, the
comments received, the review by NIST,
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and consultation with FTC staff, it is
ordered that:
(1) The Petition for Waiver submitted
by LG Electronics (LG) (Case No. CD–
002) is hereby granted as set forth in the
paragraphs below.
(2) LG shall not be required to test or
rate its DLEC733W ventless clothes
dryer products on the basis of the test
procedures at 10 CFR part 430, subpart
B, appendix D. The existing 1994
minimum energy conservation standard
for clothes dryers at 10 CFR 430.32(h) is
not applicable to this LG ventless
clothes dryer.
(3) This waiver shall remain in effect
from the date this Decision and Order is
issued until the effective date of the
final rule(s) in which DOE prescribes
test procedures and minimum energy
conservation standards appropriate to
the above model series manufactured by
LG.
(4) This waiver is conditioned upon
the presumed validity of statements,
representations, and documentary
materials provided by the petitioner.
This waiver may be revoked or modified
at any time upon a determination that
the factual basis underlying the Petition
for Waiver is incorrect.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 27,
2008.
John F. Mizroch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. E8–26692 Filed 11–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project No. 12557–001–RI]
SBER Royal Mills, LLC; Notice of
Availability of Environmental
Assessment
November 3, 2008.
In accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and
the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission’s regulations, 18 CFR part
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the
Office of Energy Projects has reviewed
the application for exemption from
licensing for the Royal Mills
Hydroelectric Project, to be located on
the South Branch Pawtuxet River, in the
Town of West Warwick, Kent County,
Rhode Island, and has prepared an
Environmental Assessment (EA). In the
EA, Commission staff analyze the
potential environmental effects of the
project and conclude that issuing an
exemption for the project, with
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 218 (Monday, November 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66641-66642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26692]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
[Case No. CD-002]
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Decision and
Order Granting a Waiver to LG Electronics From the Department of Energy
Residential Clothes Dryer Test Procedures [Case No. CD-002]
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Decision and Order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice publishes the Department of Energy's Decision and
Order in Case No. CD-002, which grants to LG Electronics Inc. (LG) a
waiver from the existing Department of Energy (DOE) residential clothes
dryer test procedure for its product line of DLEC733W ventless clothes
dryers, because the existing test procedure only applies to clothes
dryers that are vented.
DATES: This Decision and Order is effective November 10, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Michael G. Raymond, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program, Mailstop EE-2J,
Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-9611. E-mail:
Michael.Raymond@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Francine Pinto or Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of the General Counsel, Mailstop GC-72, Forrestal Building, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0103. Telephone: (202)
586-9507. E-mail: Francine.Pinto@hq.doe.gov or Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 10 CFR 430.27(l), DOE
gives notice of the issuance of its Decision and Order as set forth
below. In the Decision and Order, DOE grants to LG a waiver from the
existing residential clothes dryer test procedure under 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, Appendix D, for its ventless clothes dryer (model
DLEC733W), which does not have an outside exhaust.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 27, 2008.
John F. Mizroch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Decision and Order
In the Matter of: LG Electronics Inc. (LG). (Case No. CD-002)
Background
Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) sets
forth a variety of provisions concerning energy efficiency. Part A of
Title III provides for the ``Energy Conservation Program for Consumer
Products Other Than Automobiles.'' \1\ (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309) Part A
includes definitions, test procedures, labeling provisions, energy
conservation standards, and the authority to require information and
reports from manufacturers. Further, Part A authorizes the Secretary of
Energy (the Secretary) to prescribe test procedures that are reasonably
designed to produce results which measure energy efficiency, energy
use, or estimated operating costs, and that are not unduly burdensome
to conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) Relevant to the current Petition for
Waiver, the test procedure for residential clothes dryers is set forth
in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix D, ``Uniform Test Method for
Measuring the Energy Consumption of Clothes Dryers.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This part was originally titled Part B; however, it was
redesignated Part A, after Part B of Title III was repealed by
Public Law 109-58.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, DOE's regulations contain provisions allowing a person
to seek a waiver from the test procedure requirements for covered
products when the petitioner's basic model contains one or more design
characteristics that prevent testing of the basic model according to
the prescribed test procedure, or when the prescribed test procedure
may evaluate the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its
true energy consumption characteristics as to provide materially
inaccurate comparative data. 10 CFR 430.27(a)(1). Petitioners must
include in their petition any alternate test procedures known to
evaluate the basic model in a manner representative of its energy
consumption. 10 CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iii).
The Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
(the Assistant Secretary) may grant the waiver subject to conditions,
including adherence to alternate test procedures. 10 CFR 430.27(l).
Waivers generally terminate on the effective date of a final rule which
prescribes amended test procedures appropriate to the model series
manufactured by the petitioner, thereby eliminating any need for the
continuation of the waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(m).
The waiver process contained in DOE's regulations also allows any
interested person who has submitted a Petition for Waiver to file an
Application for Interim Waiver of the applicable test procedure
requirements. 10 CFR 430.27(a)(2). The Assistant Secretary will grant
an Interim Waiver request if it is determined that the applicant will
experience economic hardship if the Interim Waiver is denied, if it
appears likely that the Petition for Waiver will be granted, and/or the
Assistant Secretary determines that it would be desirable for public
policy reasons to grant immediate relief pending a determination on the
Petition for Waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(g). An Interim Waiver remains in
effect for a period of 180 days or until DOE issues its determination
on the Petition for Waiver, whichever occurs first, and may be extended
by DOE for 180 days, if necessary. 10 CFR 430.27(h).
On November 14, 2005, LG filed an Application for Interim Waiver
and Petition for Waiver from the test procedures for energy consumption
which are applicable to its product line of ventless \2\ clothes
dryers, under basic model number DLEC733W. As noted above, the relevant
test procedures are contained in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, Appendix
D. LG seeks a waiver from the test procedures for this product line
because, LG asserts, the current clothes dryer test procedures only
apply to vented clothes dryers and require the use of an exhaust
restrictor to simulate the backpressure effects of a vent tube in an
installed condition. According to LG, its line of condenser (ventless)
clothes dryers does not have exhaust vents and does not vent exhaust
air to the outside as do conventional (vented) dryers, and because the
test procedures do not provide a definition or mention of a ventless
clothes dryer, its products cannot be tested according to 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, Appendix D.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In LG's Petition for Waiver, the terms ``condenser'' or
``condensing'' were used instead of ``ventless'' to describe this
product. No change in meaning is intended by this substitution,
which was made to be consistent with other DOE documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 23, 2006, DOE published LG's Petition for Waiver and
denied the Application for Interim Waiver. 71 FR 49437. In that notice,
DOE proposed and requested comment on an alternate test procedure for
testing ventless clothes dryer products, as discussed below. In denying
LG's request for an Interim Waiver, DOE questioned whether it
[[Page 66642]]
would ultimately grant a waiver to LG, given the proposed alternate
test procedures which may permit testing of ventless dryers and new
technologies which could potentially improve the energy efficiency of
such products. DOE received comments on the LG Petition from Whirlpool
Corporation (Whirlpool), the Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers (AHAM), and Miele, Inc. (Miele).
Assertions and Determinations
LG's Petition for Waiver
On November 14, 2005, LG submitted a Petition for Waiver and an
Application for Interim Waiver from the test procedures at 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, Appendix D, which are applicable to residential
electric clothes dryers. LG did not include an alternate test procedure
with its petition, stating that it knew of no other test procedure to
rate its ventless dryer products. Accordingly, as part of the August
23, 2006 Federal Register notice, DOE proposed a modified test
procedure to accompany the LG Petition for Waiver, which was based on
the existing test procedures for clothes dryers under 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, Appendix D, but without a requirement to use an exhaust
restrictor. No other changes were made to the test procedure.
After reviewing the public comments received on this matter, DOE
notes that Whirlpool agreed with DOE's modified test procedure, but
recommended clarifications to DOE's proposed revisions of the
definitions pertaining to clothes dryers (i.e., sections 1.14 and 1.15
of the DOE clothes dryer test procedure). The commenting stakeholders
(AHAM, Miele, and Whirlpool) all stated that ventless clothes dryers
cannot meet the DOE efficiency standard, so accordingly, they
recommended a separate product class and efficiency standard for
ventless clothes dryers.
In response to the assertions of the industry commenters, DOE has
not been able to find data as to whether ventless clothes dryers can or
cannot meet the existing DOE clothes dryer energy conservation
standard. Nevertheless, DOE acknowledges the commenters' experience in
working with this type of product. However, if this type of clothes
dryer is indeed unable to meet the standard, DOE cannot, in a waiver,
establish a separate product class\3\ and associated efficiency level.
Instead, such actions must be taken in the context of a standards
rulemaking. Such a standards rulemaking was initiated with a Framework
Document public meeting held on October 24, 2007. A Final Rule
prescribing new efficiency standards for residential clothes dryers is
expected in 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Product classes are established to recognize distinct
categories of a covered product that may necessitate different
efficiency standard levels.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is further noted that on February 17, 1995, DOE published in the
Federal Register a Decision and Order granting a waiver to Miele for a
very similar ventless clothes dryer. 60 FR 9330. Miele's waiver did not
require Miele to test its ventless clothes dryers, and in that
document, DOE stated that the energy conservation standards for clothes
dryers did not apply to Miele's ventless clothes dryers. Despite the
passage of time, LG's situation is analogous to that of Miele with
regard to ventless clothes dryers. DOE has determined that although it
would be feasible to provide LG with an alternate test procedure, as
proposed, it is likely, as all the commenters agreed, that the problem
is more fundamental than one limited to a needed test procedure change;
instead, in spite of technological developments, it is expected that
ventless clothes dryers would not meet the DOE energy conservation
standard, and that a separate clothes dryer class (with a separate
efficiency standard) would have to be established for ventless clothes
dryers. Otherwise, a type of product with unique consumer utility could
be driven from the market. However, the establishment of product
classes cannot be done in a waiver, but only in a standards rulemaking.
Therefore, inasmuch as ventless clothes dryers are likely unable to
meet the DOE clothes dryer efficiency standard, and there is a long-
standing waiver granted to Miele, DOE has decided to grant a similar
waiver to LG from testing of its ventless clothes dryers. Therefore,
DOE is not making any modifications to its existing clothes dryer test
procedure at this time, and it will not require LG to test its
specified ventless clothes dryer models under that procedure.
Consultations With Other Agencies
DOE consulted with Federal Trade Commission (FTC) staff concerning
the LG petition. The FTC staff did not have any objections to granting
a waiver to LG. DOE also consulted with the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) concerning the LG petition, and NIST
likewise did not have any objections to granting a waiver to LG.
Conclusion
After careful consideration of all the material that was submitted
by LG, the comments received, the review by NIST, and consultation with
FTC staff, it is ordered that:
(1) The Petition for Waiver submitted by LG Electronics (LG) (Case
No. CD-002) is hereby granted as set forth in the paragraphs below.
(2) LG shall not be required to test or rate its DLEC733W ventless
clothes dryer products on the basis of the test procedures at 10 CFR
part 430, subpart B, appendix D. The existing 1994 minimum energy
conservation standard for clothes dryers at 10 CFR 430.32(h) is not
applicable to this LG ventless clothes dryer.
(3) This waiver shall remain in effect from the date this Decision
and Order is issued until the effective date of the final rule(s) in
which DOE prescribes test procedures and minimum energy conservation
standards appropriate to the above model series manufactured by LG.
(4) This waiver is conditioned upon the presumed validity of
statements, representations, and documentary materials provided by the
petitioner. This waiver may be revoked or modified at any time upon a
determination that the factual basis underlying the Petition for Waiver
is incorrect.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 27, 2008.
John F. Mizroch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. E8-26692 Filed 11-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P