Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; IXEMPRA, 66646-66647 [E8-26678]
Download as PDF
66646
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 218 / Monday, November 10, 2008 / Notices
In December 2000, Congress enacted
Public Law 106–554, which among
other provisions, directed FDA to
‘‘reexamine existing condom labels’’
and ‘‘determine whether the labels are
medically accurate regarding the overall
effectiveness or lack of effectiveness in
preventing sexually transmitted
diseases* * *.’’ FDA is recommending
labeling changes intended to provide
important information for condom
users, including the extent of protection
provided by condoms against various
types of sexually transmitted diseases.
Respondents to this collection of
information are manufacturers and
repackagers of male condoms made of
natural rubber latex without spermicidal
lubricant. FDA believes that this is a
one-time burden, because once a label is
redesigned, it can be used indefinitely.
In the Federal Register of November
14, 2005 (70 FR 69156), FDA published
a 60-day notice soliciting public
comment on the information collection
provisions, contained in the draft
special controls guidance document
then entitled ‘‘Labeling for Male
Condoms Made of Natural Rubber
Latex.’’ FDA has subsequently retitled
the special controls guidance document
containing these information collection
provisions to avoid confusion between
the guidance established as a special
control for condoms classified under 21
CFR 884.5300 by the final rule
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register and the November
2005 draft guidance, which remains
available (but not for implementation)
in conjunction with the pending
proposal to amend another
classification. No comments were
received on the information collection
provisions in response to the 60-day
notice.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
No. of
Respondents
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
352
34
1,190
12
14,280
33
34
102
12
1,224
Total
15,504
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
manufacturers for year one.
Manufacturers for years two and three.
2 Current
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
3 New
The reporting burden hours to
respondents in the first year is a onetime burden of 14,280 hours. FDA
expects three new manufacturers or
repackagers to enter the market yearly,
and collectively have a one-time burden
of 1,224 hours. The number of
respondents and prospective new
manufacturers cited in table 1 of this
document are based on FDA’s database
of premarket submissions. The
remaining figures were derived from a
study performed for FDA by Eastern
Research Group, Inc., an economic
consulting firm, to estimate the impact
of the 1999 over-the-counter (OTC)
human drug labeling requirements final
rule (64 FR 13254, March 17, 1999).
Because the packaging requirements for
condoms are similar to those of many
OTC drugs, we believe the burden to
redesign the labeling for OTC drugs is
an appropriate proxy for the estimated
burden to redesign condom labeling.
Cost estimates were adjusted to account
for inflation using the producer price
index.
The draft guidance also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
The collections of information under 21
CFR part 807 subpart E have been
approved under OMB control no. 0910–
0120; the collections of information
under 21 CFR part 820 have been
approved under OMB control no. 0910–
0073; and the collections of information
in part 801 (21 CFR part 801) have been
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:09 Nov 07, 2008
Jkt 217001
approved under OMB control no. 0910–
0485.
The collection of information under
§ 801.437 does not constitute a
‘‘collection of information’’ under the
PRA. Rather, it is a ‘‘public disclosure
of information originally supplied by
the Federal Government to the recipient
for the purpose of disclosure to the
public’’ (5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2)).
Dated: October 30, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–26828 Filed 11–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2008–E–0093]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; IXEMPRA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
IXEMPRA and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 218 / Monday, November 10, 2008 / Notices
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product IXEMPRA
(ixabepilone). IXEMPRA in combination
with capecitabine is indicated for the
treatment of metastatic or locally
advanced breast cancer in patients after
failure of an anthracycline and a taxane.
IXEMPRA as monotherapy is indicated
for the treatment of metastatic or locally
advanced breast cancer in patients after
failure of an anthracycline, a taxane,
and capecitabine. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for IXEMPRA (U.S. Patent
No. 6,605,599) from Bristol Myers
Squibb Co., and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated April 22, 2008, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of IXEMPRA
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
IXEMPRA is 3,002 days. Of this time,
2,818 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 184 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: July 30, 1999.
The applicant claims June 30, 1999, as
the date the investigational new drug
application (IND) became effective.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Nov 07, 2008
Jkt 217001
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was July 30, 1999,
which was thirty days after FDA receipt
of the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: April 16, 2007. FDA
has verified the applicant’s claim that
the new drug application (NDA) for
Ixempra (NDA 22–065) was initially
submitted on April 16, 2007.
3. The date the application was
approved: October 16, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
22–065 was approved on October 16,
2007.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 854 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by January 9, 2009.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
May 11, 2009. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008,
the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to
the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a
Government-wide, electronic docket
management system. Electronic
comments or submissions will be
accepted by FDA only through FDMS at
https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66647
Dated: October 20, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8–26678 Filed 11–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2007–E–0229]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; TYKERB
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
TYKERB and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law.
FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 218 (Monday, November 10, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66646-66647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26678]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2008-E-0093]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; IXEMPRA
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for IXEMPRA and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and
[[Page 66647]]
an approval phase. For human drug products, the testing phase begins
when the exemption to permit the clinical investigations of the human
drug product becomes effective and runs until the approval phase
begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an
application to market the human drug product and continues until FDA
grants permission to market the drug product. Although only a portion
of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time
that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's
determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human
drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product IXEMPRA
(ixabepilone). IXEMPRA in combination with capecitabine is indicated
for the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer in
patients after failure of an anthracycline and a taxane. IXEMPRA as
monotherapy is indicated for the treatment of metastatic or locally
advanced breast cancer in patients after failure of an anthracycline, a
taxane, and capecitabine. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and
Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for
IXEMPRA (U.S. Patent No. 6,605,599) from Bristol Myers Squibb Co., and
the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in
determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a
letter dated April 22, 2008, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review
period and that the approval of IXEMPRA represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
IXEMPRA is 3,002 days. Of this time, 2,818 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 184 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
July 30, 1999. The applicant claims June 30, 1999, as the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However,
FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was July 30, 1999,
which was thirty days after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: April 16, 2007.
FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug application
(NDA) for Ixempra (NDA 22-065) was initially submitted on April 16,
2007.
3. The date the application was approved: October 16, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 22-065 was approved on October
16, 2007.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 854 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by January 9, 2009. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by May 11, 2009.
To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit
an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR
10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: October 20, 2008.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8-26678 Filed 11-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S