Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Santa Clara, CA, as a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area, 65495-65496 [E8-26274]
Download as PDF
65495
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 214
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206–AL74
Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment
of Santa Clara, CA, as a
Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage
System Wage Area
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management is issuing an interim rule
to abolish the Santa Clara, California,
nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal
Wage System (FWS) wage area and
redefine Santa Clara County, CA, to the
Monterey, CA, NAF wage area and
Alameda, Contra Costa, and San
Francisco Counties, CA, to the Solano,
CA, NAF wage area. San Mateo County,
CA, will no longer be defined. These
changes are necessary because the
closure of the Moffett Federal Airfield
Navy Exchange will leave the Santa
Clara wage area without an activity
having the capability to conduct a local
wage survey.
DATES: Effective Date: This regulation is
effective on November 4, 2008. We must
receive comments on or before
December 4, 2008. Applicability date:
FWS employees remaining in the Santa
Clara wage area will be transferred to
the Monterey and Solano wage area
schedules on the first day of the first
applicable pay period beginning on or
after November 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments
to Charles D. Grimes III, Deputy
Associate Director for Performance and
Pay Systems, Strategic Human
Resources Policy Division, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, Room 7H31,
1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC
20415–8200; e-mail pay-performance-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:01 Nov 03, 2008
Jkt 217001
policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606–
4264.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606–2838; email pay-performance-policy@opm.gov;
or FAX: (202) 606–4264.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Santa
Clara, California, nonappropriated fund
(NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS)
wage area is presently composed of one
survey county, Santa Clara County, CA,
and four area of application counties,
Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco,
and San Mateo Counties, CA. Under
section 532.219 of title 5, Code of
Federal Regulations, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management (OPM) may
establish an NAF wage area when there
are a minimum of 26 NAF wage
employees in the survey area, the local
activity has the capability to host annual
local wage surveys, and the survey area
has at least 1,800 private enterprise
employees in establishments within
survey specifications. The Department
of Defense (DOD) notified OPM that the
Moffett Federal Airfield Navy Exchange
has closed, leaving the Santa Clara NAF
wage area without an activity having the
capability to conduct a local wage
survey. The NAF FWS employment in
Santa Clara County is currently 9
employees at the Moffett Navy Lodge
and 17 employees at the VA Medical
Center in Palo Alto. DOD recommended
that OPM abolish the Santa Clara NAF
FWS wage area and redefine Santa Clara
County to the Monterey, CA, NAF wage
area and Alameda, Contra Costa, and
San Francisco Counties to the Solano,
CA, NAF wage area.
Since Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra
Costa, and San Francisco Counties will
have continuing NAF employment and
do not meet the regulatory criteria under
5 CFR 532.219 to be separate survey
areas, they must be areas of application.
In defining counties as area of
application counties, OPM considers the
following criteria:
(i) Proximity of largest facilities
activity in each county;
(ii) Transportation facilities and
commuting patterns; and
(iii) Similarities of the counties in:
(A) Overall population;
(B) Private employment in major
industry categories; and
(C) Kinds and sizes of private
industrial establishments.
In selecting a wage area to which
Santa Clara County should be redefined,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
proximity favors the Monterey NAF
wage area. All other criteria are
inconclusive. Based on these findings,
OPM is defining Santa Clara County as
an area of application to the Monterey
NAF wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which
Alameda County should be redefined,
proximity favors the San Joaquin wage
area over the Solano wage area by
approximately 1 mile. All other criteria
are inconclusive. Based on the mixed
nature of the regulatory analysis
findings, we believe the fact that
Alameda is geographically linked to
Contra Costa, with both counties
encompassing the greater Oakland area,
provides strong evidence that Alameda
and Contra Costa should remain
together. Therefore, OPM is defining
Alameda County as an area of
application to the Solano wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which
Contra Costa County should be
redefined, proximity favors the Solano
wage area. Commuting patterns very
slightly favor the Solano wage area. All
other criteria are inconclusive. Based on
the mixed nature of the regulatory
analysis findings, we believe the fact
that Contra Costa is geographically
linked to Alameda, with both counties
encompassing the greater Oakland area,
provides strong evidence that Alameda
and Contra Costa should remain
together. Therefore, OPM is defining
Contra Costa County as an area of
application to the Solano wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which San
Francisco County should be redefined,
proximity favors the Solano wage area.
All other criteria are inconclusive.
Based on these findings, OPM is
defining San Francisco County as an
area of application to the Solano wage
area.
OPM is removing San Mateo County
from the wage area definition. There are
no longer NAF FWS employees working
in San Mateo County. Under 5 U.S.C.
5343(a)(1)(B)(i), NAF wage areas ‘‘shall
not extend beyond the immediate
locality in which the particular
prevailing rate employees are
employed.’’ Therefore, San Mateo
County should not be defined as part of
an NAF wage area.
The Monterey NAF wage area would
consist of one survey county, Monterey
County, and one area of application
county, Santa Clara County. The Solano
NAF wage area would consist of one
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
65496
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 4, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Final rule.
survey county, Solano County, and six
area of application counties: Alameda,
Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San
Francisco, and Sonoma Counties. FWS
employees remaining in the Santa Clara
wage area will be transferred to the
Monterey and Solano wage area
schedules on the first day of the first
applicable pay period beginning on or
after November 15, 2008. The Federal
Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee,
the national labor-management
committee responsible for advising
OPM on matters concerning the pay of
FWS employees, has reviewed and
recommended these changes by
consensus.
Waiver of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and
(d)(3), I find that good cause exists to
waive the general notice of proposed
rulemaking. Also pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), I find that good cause exists
for making this rule effective in less
than 30 days. This notice is being
waived and the regulation is being made
effective in less than 30 days because
the closure of the Moffett Federal
Airfield Navy Exchange will leave the
Santa Clara wage area without an
activity having the capability to conduct
a local wage survey and the remaining
NAF FWS employees in Santa Clara,
Alameda, Contra Costa, and San
Francisco Counties must be transferred
to a continuing wage area as soon as
possible.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
because they will affect only Federal
agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Michael W. Hager,
Acting Director.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
3. Appendix D to subpart B is
amended for the State of California by
removing the wage area listing for Santa
Clara, California, and revising the wage
area listing for Monterey and Solano,
California, to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
California
*
*
*
*
*
Monterey
Survey Area
California:
Monterey.
Area of application. Survey area plus:
California:
Santa Clara.
*
*
*
*
*
Solano
Survey Area
California:
Solano.
Area of application. Survey area plus:
California:
Alameda.
Contra Costa.
Marin.
Napa.
San Francisco.
Sonoma.
[FR Doc. E8–26274 Filed 11–3–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 630
RIN 3206–AL26
SUMMARY:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Jkt 217001
Transfer of Leave From Leave Bank to
Emergency Leave Transfer Program at
Another Agency
The proposed regulations added
§ 630.1104 to permit a leave bank at an
agency to donate, with the concurrence
of the leave bank board, donated annual
leave to an emergency leave transfer
program administered by another
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
AGENCY:
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management is amending 5
CFR part 532 as follows:
15:01 Nov 03, 2008
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management is issuing final regulations
on the Emergency Leave Transfer
Program to provide alternative methods
for agencies to assist their employees in
the event of a pandemic health crisis or
other major disaster or emergency as
declared by the President. The final
regulations allow donated annual leave
2. Appendix B to subpart B is
amended by removing, under the State
of California, ‘‘Santa Clara.’’
■
Emergency Leave Transfer Program
■
VerDate Aug<31>2005
in a voluntary leave bank administered
by one agency to be transferred to an
emergency leave transfer program
administered by another agency, revise
the rules for returning unused donated
annual leave to emergency leave donors
(including leave banks), and incorporate
the inclusion of Judicial branch
employees as eligible participants in the
emergency leave transfer program. In
addition, the final regulations have been
reorganized and renumbered to aid in
accessibility and enhance reader
understanding.
DATES: Effective Date: December 4, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Rippey, by telephone at (202)
606–2858; by fax at (202) 606–0824; or
by e-mail at pay-performancepolicy@opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 15, 2007, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management (OPM)
published proposed regulations (72 FR
58263) to amend 5 CFR 630, subpart K,
to allow donated annual leave in a
voluntary leave bank administered by
one agency to be transferred to an
emergency leave transfer program
administered by another agency, revise
the rules for returning unused donated
annual leave to emergency leave donors
(including leave banks), and incorporate
the inclusion of Judicial branch
employees as eligible participants in the
emergency leave transfer program, as
provided by Public Law 109–229, now
codified at 5 U.S.C. 6391(f).
The amendments made to OPM’s
regulations are intended to support
OPM’s continuing efforts to provide
alternative methods for agencies to
assist their employees in the event of a
pandemic health crisis or other major
disaster or emergency as declared by the
President. In addition, the final
regulations have been reorganized and
renumbered to aid in accessibility and
enhance reader understanding.
The 60-day comment period for the
proposed regulations ended on
December 14, 2007. During the
comment period, we received comments
from five agencies, three unions, one
payroll provider, and two individuals. A
summary of the comments received and
the changes made in the regulations are
presented below.
Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 532—
Nationwide Schedule of
Nonappropriated Fund Regular Wage
Surveys
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04NOR1.SGM
04NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 4, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65495-65496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26274]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 4, 2008 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 65495]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AL74
Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Santa Clara, CA, as a
Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management is issuing an interim
rule to abolish the Santa Clara, California, nonappropriated fund (NAF)
Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area and redefine Santa Clara County,
CA, to the Monterey, CA, NAF wage area and Alameda, Contra Costa, and
San Francisco Counties, CA, to the Solano, CA, NAF wage area. San Mateo
County, CA, will no longer be defined. These changes are necessary
because the closure of the Moffett Federal Airfield Navy Exchange will
leave the Santa Clara wage area without an activity having the
capability to conduct a local wage survey.
DATES: Effective Date: This regulation is effective on November 4,
2008. We must receive comments on or before December 4, 2008.
Applicability date: FWS employees remaining in the Santa Clara wage
area will be transferred to the Monterey and Solano wage area schedules
on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or
after November 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Charles D. Grimes III, Deputy
Associate Director for Performance and Pay Systems, Strategic Human
Resources Policy Division, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room
7H31, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200; e-mail pay-
performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; e-
mail pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Santa Clara, California, nonappropriated
fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area is presently composed of
one survey county, Santa Clara County, CA, and four area of application
counties, Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties,
CA. Under section 532.219 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations, the
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) may establish an NAF wage
area when there are a minimum of 26 NAF wage employees in the survey
area, the local activity has the capability to host annual local wage
surveys, and the survey area has at least 1,800 private enterprise
employees in establishments within survey specifications. The
Department of Defense (DOD) notified OPM that the Moffett Federal
Airfield Navy Exchange has closed, leaving the Santa Clara NAF wage
area without an activity having the capability to conduct a local wage
survey. The NAF FWS employment in Santa Clara County is currently 9
employees at the Moffett Navy Lodge and 17 employees at the VA Medical
Center in Palo Alto. DOD recommended that OPM abolish the Santa Clara
NAF FWS wage area and redefine Santa Clara County to the Monterey, CA,
NAF wage area and Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Francisco Counties to
the Solano, CA, NAF wage area.
Since Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Francisco
Counties will have continuing NAF employment and do not meet the
regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.219 to be separate survey areas,
they must be areas of application. In defining counties as area of
application counties, OPM considers the following criteria:
(i) Proximity of largest facilities activity in each county;
(ii) Transportation facilities and commuting patterns; and
(iii) Similarities of the counties in:
(A) Overall population;
(B) Private employment in major industry categories; and
(C) Kinds and sizes of private industrial establishments.
In selecting a wage area to which Santa Clara County should be
redefined, proximity favors the Monterey NAF wage area. All other
criteria are inconclusive. Based on these findings, OPM is defining
Santa Clara County as an area of application to the Monterey NAF wage
area.
In selecting a wage area to which Alameda County should be
redefined, proximity favors the San Joaquin wage area over the Solano
wage area by approximately 1 mile. All other criteria are inconclusive.
Based on the mixed nature of the regulatory analysis findings, we
believe the fact that Alameda is geographically linked to Contra Costa,
with both counties encompassing the greater Oakland area, provides
strong evidence that Alameda and Contra Costa should remain together.
Therefore, OPM is defining Alameda County as an area of application to
the Solano wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which Contra Costa County should be
redefined, proximity favors the Solano wage area. Commuting patterns
very slightly favor the Solano wage area. All other criteria are
inconclusive. Based on the mixed nature of the regulatory analysis
findings, we believe the fact that Contra Costa is geographically
linked to Alameda, with both counties encompassing the greater Oakland
area, provides strong evidence that Alameda and Contra Costa should
remain together. Therefore, OPM is defining Contra Costa County as an
area of application to the Solano wage area.
In selecting a wage area to which San Francisco County should be
redefined, proximity favors the Solano wage area. All other criteria
are inconclusive. Based on these findings, OPM is defining San
Francisco County as an area of application to the Solano wage area.
OPM is removing San Mateo County from the wage area definition.
There are no longer NAF FWS employees working in San Mateo County.
Under 5 U.S.C. 5343(a)(1)(B)(i), NAF wage areas ``shall not extend
beyond the immediate locality in which the particular prevailing rate
employees are employed.'' Therefore, San Mateo County should not be
defined as part of an NAF wage area.
The Monterey NAF wage area would consist of one survey county,
Monterey County, and one area of application county, Santa Clara
County. The Solano NAF wage area would consist of one
[[Page 65496]]
survey county, Solano County, and six area of application counties:
Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, and Sonoma Counties.
FWS employees remaining in the Santa Clara wage area will be
transferred to the Monterey and Solano wage area schedules on the first
day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after November
15, 2008. The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, the national
labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters
concerning the pay of FWS employees, has reviewed and recommended these
changes by consensus.
Waiver of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Delay in Effective Date
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3), I find that good
cause exists to waive the general notice of proposed rulemaking. Also
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), I find that good cause exists for
making this rule effective in less than 30 days. This notice is being
waived and the regulation is being made effective in less than 30 days
because the closure of the Moffett Federal Airfield Navy Exchange will
leave the Santa Clara wage area without an activity having the
capability to conduct a local wage survey and the remaining NAF FWS
employees in Santa Clara, Alameda, Contra Costa, and San Francisco
Counties must be transferred to a continuing wage area as soon as
possible.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
will affect only Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
Office of Personnel Management.
Michael W. Hager,
Acting Director.
0
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is amending 5 CFR
part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
Appendix B to Subpart B of Part 532--Nationwide Schedule of
Nonappropriated Fund Regular Wage Surveys
0
2. Appendix B to subpart B is amended by removing, under the State of
California, ``Santa Clara.''
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532--Nonappropriated Fund Wage and
Survey Areas
0
3. Appendix D to subpart B is amended for the State of California by
removing the wage area listing for Santa Clara, California, and
revising the wage area listing for Monterey and Solano, California, to
read as follows:
* * * * *
California
* * * * *
Monterey
Survey Area
California:
Monterey.
Area of application. Survey area plus:
California:
Santa Clara.
* * * * *
Solano
Survey Area
California:
Solano.
Area of application. Survey area plus:
California:
Alameda.
Contra Costa.
Marin.
Napa.
San Francisco.
Sonoma.
[FR Doc. E8-26274 Filed 11-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P