Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Guidance for Industry on Formal Dispute Resolution; Appeals Above the Division Level, 65385-65386 [E8-26095]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 213 / Monday, November 3, 2008 / Notices annual reporting burden estimates in table 1 of this document are based on FDA’s previous experience. Dated: October 29, 2008. Jeffrey Shuren, Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning. [FR Doc. E8–26162 Filed 10–31–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0565] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Guidance for Industry on Formal Dispute Resolution; Appeals Above the Division Level AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection contained in the guidance for industry on formal dispute resolution. DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of information by January 2, 2009. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of Information Management (HFA–710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–3792. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:58 Oct 31, 2008 Jkt 217001 agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. ‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection of information set forth in this document. With respect to the following collection of information, FDA invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA’s functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of information technology. Guidance for Industry on Formal Dispute Resolution; Appeals Above the Division Level (OMB Control Number 0910–0430)—Extension This information collection approval request is for an FDA guidance on the process for formally resolving scientific and procedural disputes in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) that cannot be resolved at the division level. The guidance describes procedures for formally appealing such disputes to the office or center level and for submitting information to assist center officials in resolving the issue(s) presented. The guidance provides information on how the agency will interpret and apply provisions of the existing regulations regarding internal agency review of decisions (§ 10.75) and dispute resolution during the investigational new drug (IND) process (§ 312.48) and the new drug application/abbreviated new drug application (NDA/ANDA) PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 65385 process (§ 314.103). In addition, the guidance provides information on how the agency will interpret and apply the specific Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goals for major dispute resolution associated with the development and review of PDUFA products. Existing regulations, which appear primarily in parts 10, 312, and 314 (21 CFR parts 10, 312, and 314), establish procedures for the resolution of scientific and procedural disputes between interested persons and the agency, CDER, and CBER. All agency decisions on such matters are based on information in the administrative file (§ 10.75(d)). In general, the information in an administrative file is collected under existing regulations in parts 312 (OMB Control No. 0910–0014), 314 (OMB Control No. 0910–0001), and part 601 (21 CFR part 601) (OMB Control No. 0910–0338), which specify the information that manufacturers must submit so that FDA may properly evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drugs and biological products. This information is usually submitted as part of an IND, NDA, or biologics license application (BLA), or as a supplement to an approved application. While FDA already possesses in the administrative file the information that would form the basis of a decision on a matter in dispute resolution, the submission of particular information regarding the request itself and the data and information relied on by the requestor in the appeal would facilitate timely resolution of the dispute. The guidance describes the following collection of information not expressly specified under existing regulations: The submission of the request for dispute resolution as an amendment to the application for the underlying product, including the submission of supporting information with the request for dispute resolution. Agency regulations (§§ 312.23(11)(d), 314.50, 314.94, and 601.2) state that information provided to the agency as part of an IND, NDA, ANDA, or BLA is to be submitted in triplicate and with an appropriate cover form. Form FDA 1571 must accompany submissions under INDs and Form FDA 356h must accompany submissions under NDAs, ANDAs, and BLAs. Both forms have valid OMB control numbers as follows: FDA Form 1571 - OMB Control No. 0910–0014, and FDA Form 356h - OMB Control No. 0910–0338. In the guidance document, CDER and CBER ask that a request for formal dispute resolution be submitted as an amendment to the application for the underlying product and that it be E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM 03NON1 65386 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 213 / Monday, November 3, 2008 / Notices submitted to the agency in triplicate with the appropriate form attached, either Form FDA 1571 or Form FDA 356h. The agency recommends that a request be submitted as an amendment in this manner for two reasons: (1) To ensure that each request is kept in the administrative file with the entire underlying application and (2) to ensure that pertinent information about the request is entered into the appropriate tracking databases. Use of the information in the agency’s tracking databases enables the appropriate agency official to monitor progress on the resolution of the dispute and to ensure that appropriate steps will be taken in a timely manner. CDER and CBER have determined and the guidance recommends that the following information should be submitted to the appropriate center with each request for dispute resolution so that the Center may quickly and efficiently respond to the request: (1) A brief but comprehensive statement of each issue to be resolved, including a description of the issue; the nature of the issue (i.e., scientific, procedural, or both); possible solutions based on information in the administrative file; whether informal dispute resolution was sought prior to the formal appeal; whether advisory committee review is sought; and the expected outcome; (2) a statement identifying the review division/office that issued the original decision on the matter and, if applicable, the last agency official that attempted to formally resolve the matter; (3) a list of documents in the administrative file, or additional copies of such documents, that are deemed necessary for resolution of the issue(s); and (4) a statement that the previous supervisory level has already had the opportunity to review all of the material relied on for dispute resolution. The information that the agency suggests submitting with a formal request for dispute resolution consists of: (1) Statements describing the issue from the perspective of the person with a dispute, (2) brief statements describing the history of the matter, and (3) the documents previously submitted to FDA under an OMB approved collection of information. Based on FDA’s experience with dispute resolution, the agency expects that most persons seeking formal dispute resolution will have gathered the materials listed previously when identifying the existence of a dispute with the agency. Consequently, FDA anticipates that the collection of information attributed solely to the guidance will be minimal. Description of Respondents: A sponsor, applicant, or manufacturer of a drug or biological product regulated by the agency under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act who requests formal resolution of a scientific or procedural dispute. Burden Estimate: Provided in table 1 of this document is an estimate of the annual reporting burden for requests for dispute resolution. Based on data collected from review divisions and offices within CDER and CBER, FDA estimates that approximately 13 sponsors and applicants (respondents) submit requests for formal dispute resolution to CDER annually and approximately 1 respondent submits requests for formal dispute resolution to CBER annually. The total annual responses are the total number of requests submitted to CDER and CBER in 1 year, including requests for dispute resolution that a single respondent submits more than one time. FDA estimates that CDER receives approximately 22 requests annually and CBER receives approximately 1 request annually. The hours per response is the estimated number of hours that a respondent would spend preparing the information to be submitted with a request for formal dispute resolution in accordance with the guidance, including the time it takes to gather and copy brief statements describing the issue from the perspective of the person with the dispute, brief statements describing the history of the matter, and supporting information that has already been submitted to the agency. Based on experience, FDA estimates that approximately 8 hours on average would be needed per response. Therefore, FDA estimates that 184 hours will be spent per year by respondents requesting formal dispute resolution under the guidance. TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1 Requests for Formal Dispute Resolution No. of Respondents No. of Responses per Respondent Total Annual Responses Hours Per Response Total Hours CDER 13 1.7 22 8 176 CBER 1 1 1 8 8 Total 1 There 184 are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov. Dated: October 23, 2008. Jeffrey Shuren, Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning. [FR Doc. E8–26095 Filed 10–31–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2008–N–0038] Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory committee VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:58 Oct 31, 2008 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM 03NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 213 (Monday, November 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65385-65386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26095]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0565]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request; Guidance for Industry on Formal Dispute Resolution; 
Appeals Above the Division Level

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an 
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain 
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the 
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, 
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of 
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the 
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection 
contained in the guidance for industry on formal dispute resolution.

DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of 
information by January 2, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information 
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the 
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, 
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket 
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of 
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3792.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal 
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. 
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of 
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a 
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) 
requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal 
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including 
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, 
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with 
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection 
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA 
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection 
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's 
functions, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways 
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when 
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Guidance for Industry on Formal Dispute Resolution; Appeals Above the 
Division Level (OMB Control Number 0910-0430)--Extension

    This information collection approval request is for an FDA guidance 
on the process for formally resolving scientific and procedural 
disputes in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and the 
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) that cannot be 
resolved at the division level. The guidance describes procedures for 
formally appealing such disputes to the office or center level and for 
submitting information to assist center officials in resolving the 
issue(s) presented. The guidance provides information on how the agency 
will interpret and apply provisions of the existing regulations 
regarding internal agency review of decisions (Sec.  10.75) and dispute 
resolution during the investigational new drug (IND) process (Sec.  
312.48) and the new drug application/abbreviated new drug application 
(NDA/ANDA) process (Sec.  314.103). In addition, the guidance provides 
information on how the agency will interpret and apply the specific 
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goals for major dispute 
resolution associated with the development and review of PDUFA 
products.
    Existing regulations, which appear primarily in parts 10, 312, and 
314 (21 CFR parts 10, 312, and 314), establish procedures for the 
resolution of scientific and procedural disputes between interested 
persons and the agency, CDER, and CBER. All agency decisions on such 
matters are based on information in the administrative file (Sec.  
10.75(d)). In general, the information in an administrative file is 
collected under existing regulations in parts 312 (OMB Control No. 
0910-0014), 314 (OMB Control No. 0910-0001), and part 601 (21 CFR part 
601) (OMB Control No. 0910-0338), which specify the information that 
manufacturers must submit so that FDA may properly evaluate the safety 
and effectiveness of drugs and biological products. This information is 
usually submitted as part of an IND, NDA, or biologics license 
application (BLA), or as a supplement to an approved application. While 
FDA already possesses in the administrative file the information that 
would form the basis of a decision on a matter in dispute resolution, 
the submission of particular information regarding the request itself 
and the data and information relied on by the requestor in the appeal 
would facilitate timely resolution of the dispute. The guidance 
describes the following collection of information not expressly 
specified under existing regulations: The submission of the request for 
dispute resolution as an amendment to the application for the 
underlying product, including the submission of supporting information 
with the request for dispute resolution.
    Agency regulations (Sec. Sec.  312.23(11)(d), 314.50, 314.94, and 
601.2) state that information provided to the agency as part of an IND, 
NDA, ANDA, or BLA is to be submitted in triplicate and with an 
appropriate cover form. Form FDA 1571 must accompany submissions under 
INDs and Form FDA 356h must accompany submissions under NDAs, ANDAs, 
and BLAs. Both forms have valid OMB control numbers as follows: FDA 
Form 1571 - OMB Control No. 0910-0014, and FDA Form 356h - OMB Control 
No. 0910-0338.
    In the guidance document, CDER and CBER ask that a request for 
formal dispute resolution be submitted as an amendment to the 
application for the underlying product and that it be

[[Page 65386]]

submitted to the agency in triplicate with the appropriate form 
attached, either Form FDA 1571 or Form FDA 356h. The agency recommends 
that a request be submitted as an amendment in this manner for two 
reasons: (1) To ensure that each request is kept in the administrative 
file with the entire underlying application and (2) to ensure that 
pertinent information about the request is entered into the appropriate 
tracking databases. Use of the information in the agency's tracking 
databases enables the appropriate agency official to monitor progress 
on the resolution of the dispute and to ensure that appropriate steps 
will be taken in a timely manner.
    CDER and CBER have determined and the guidance recommends that the 
following information should be submitted to the appropriate center 
with each request for dispute resolution so that the Center may quickly 
and efficiently respond to the request: (1) A brief but comprehensive 
statement of each issue to be resolved, including a description of the 
issue; the nature of the issue (i.e., scientific, procedural, or both); 
possible solutions based on information in the administrative file; 
whether informal dispute resolution was sought prior to the formal 
appeal; whether advisory committee review is sought; and the expected 
outcome; (2) a statement identifying the review division/office that 
issued the original decision on the matter and, if applicable, the last 
agency official that attempted to formally resolve the matter; (3) a 
list of documents in the administrative file, or additional copies of 
such documents, that are deemed necessary for resolution of the 
issue(s); and (4) a statement that the previous supervisory level has 
already had the opportunity to review all of the material relied on for 
dispute resolution. The information that the agency suggests submitting 
with a formal request for dispute resolution consists of: (1) 
Statements describing the issue from the perspective of the person with 
a dispute, (2) brief statements describing the history of the matter, 
and (3) the documents previously submitted to FDA under an OMB approved 
collection of information.
    Based on FDA's experience with dispute resolution, the agency 
expects that most persons seeking formal dispute resolution will have 
gathered the materials listed previously when identifying the existence 
of a dispute with the agency. Consequently, FDA anticipates that the 
collection of information attributed solely to the guidance will be 
minimal.
    Description of Respondents: A sponsor, applicant, or manufacturer 
of a drug or biological product regulated by the agency under the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or section 351 of the Public 
Health Service Act who requests formal resolution of a scientific or 
procedural dispute.
    Burden Estimate: Provided in table 1 of this document is an 
estimate of the annual reporting burden for requests for dispute 
resolution. Based on data collected from review divisions and offices 
within CDER and CBER, FDA estimates that approximately 13 sponsors and 
applicants (respondents) submit requests for formal dispute resolution 
to CDER annually and approximately 1 respondent submits requests for 
formal dispute resolution to CBER annually. The total annual responses 
are the total number of requests submitted to CDER and CBER in 1 year, 
including requests for dispute resolution that a single respondent 
submits more than one time. FDA estimates that CDER receives 
approximately 22 requests annually and CBER receives approximately 1 
request annually. The hours per response is the estimated number of 
hours that a respondent would spend preparing the information to be 
submitted with a request for formal dispute resolution in accordance 
with the guidance, including the time it takes to gather and copy brief 
statements describing the issue from the perspective of the person with 
the dispute, brief statements describing the history of the matter, and 
supporting information that has already been submitted to the agency. 
Based on experience, FDA estimates that approximately 8 hours on 
average would be needed per response. Therefore, FDA estimates that 184 
hours will be spent per year by respondents requesting formal dispute 
resolution under the guidance.

                                                     Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           No. of        No. of Responses  per      Total Annual        Hours Per
       Requests for Formal Dispute Resolution           Respondents            Respondent            Responses           Response         Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDER                                                                13                      1.7                 22                  8                176
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBER                                                                 1                        1                  1                  8                  8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                                                                                                184
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets 
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management 
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management 
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only 
through FDMS at https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: October 23, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-26095 Filed 10-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.