Infrastructure Improvements Under Section 897, 64901-64903 [E8-26074]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Proposed Rules
64901
TABLE 1—APPLICABILITY—Continued
Manufacturer
Model
Raytheon (Mitsubishi) ........................................
Model MU–300 airplanes .................................
A003SA through A091SA inclusive.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from reports of
incomplete latching of the existing
adjustment mechanism and cracked
reinforcement assemblies, which could result
in sudden shifting of a flightcrew seat. We
are issuing this AD to prevent sudden
shifting of a flightcrew seat, which could
impair the flightcrew’s ability to control the
airplane.
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–130342–
08), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC, or sent
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS and REG–
130342–08).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposals, Jeffrey P.
Cowan at (202) 622–3850; concerning
submissions, Richard A. Hurst at (202)
622–7180 (TDD Telephone) (not toll-free
numbers) and his e-mail address is
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Restatement of the Requirements of AD 96–
03–07
(f) For Hawker Beechcraft Model MU–300–
10 airplanes and Model 400 and 400A series
airplanes: Within 200 hours time-in-service
after March 13, 1996 (the effective date of AD
96–03–07), install an improved adjustment
mechanism on the flightcrew seat, and
replace the existing aluminum seat
reinforcement assemblies with steel
assemblies, in accordance with Beechcraft
Service Bulletin SB 2536, Revision 1, dated
April 1995; or Raytheon Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 25–2536, Revision 2, dated
March 2002.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
Existing Requirements for Additional
Airplanes
(g) For Raytheon (Mitsubishi) Model MU–
300 airplanes: Within 200 flight hours or 12
months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, install an improved
adjustment mechanism on the flightcrew
seats, and replace the existing aluminum seat
reinforcement assemblies with steel
assemblies, in accordance with Raytheon
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 25–2536,
Revision 2, dated March 2002.
Note 1: A note in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Raytheon Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 25–2536, Revision 2, dated
March 2002, instructs operators to contact
Raytheon if any difficulty is encountered
while accomplishing the actions specified in
that service bulletin. However, any deviation
from the instructions provided in Raytheon
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 25–2536,
Revision 2, dated March 2002, must be
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) under paragraph (h) of
this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(h)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN:
William Griffith, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–118W, FAA, Wichita
ACO, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, MidContinent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209;
telephone (316) 946–4116; fax (316) 946–
4107; has the authority to approve AMOCs
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:45 Oct 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
Serial Nos.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
21, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–26000 Filed 10–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Overview
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–130342–08]
RIN 1545–BI10
Infrastructure Improvements Under
Section 897
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document describes
issues that the IRS and the Treasury
Department are considering addressing,
in a notice of proposed rulemaking,
under section 897 of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) regarding the
definition of an interest in real property.
The notice of proposed rulemaking
would address certain rights granted by
a governmental unit that are related to
the lease, ownership, or use of real
property. This document also invites
comments from the public regarding
these contemplated rules. All materials
submitted will be available for public
inspection and copying.
DATES: Written and electronic comments
must be submitted by January 29, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–130342–08), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Sfmt 4702
This document describes issues that
the IRS and the Treasury Department
are considering addressing, in a notice
of proposed rulemaking, regarding the
definition of an interest in real property
within the meaning of section 897(c) of
the Code. The notice of proposed
rulemaking would address certain rights
granted by a governmental unit that are
related to the lease, ownership, or use
of toll roads, toll bridges, and certain
other physical infrastructure. The
proposed regulations would amend the
§ 1.897–1 regulations.
Transactions at Issue
In a typical transaction at issue, a
domestic partnership (DP) leases or
purchases from an unrelated party
infrastructure assets and any land
underlying these infrastructure assets
(together, specified infrastructure)
within the United States. The DP’s
partners include domestic corporations
with foreign shareholders. Examples of
specified infrastructure include a toll
road or toll bridge.
Often, as a condition to operating the
specified infrastructure and to collecting
tolls for its use, DP is also required to
obtain a governmental license, permit,
franchise, or other similar right
(governmental permit). The DP may also
own or acquire property that would be
used in the trade or business of
operating the specified infrastructure,
such as signs, snow plows, and
electronic sensors.
The physical attributes of the
specified infrastructure, for example, a
relatively narrow roadway, and terms
and conditions related to the specified
infrastructure, for example, that the
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
64902
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Proposed Rules
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
lessee is required to maintain and
operate a roadway, mean that in many
cases there may practically be no
potential alternative commercial uses
for the specified infrastructure. In those
cases, the value of the leasehold interest
in the specified infrastructure derives
from the right to charge and collect tolls.
Background
Section 897(a)(1) of the Code treats
the gain or loss of a nonresident alien
or foreign corporation from the
disposition of a U.S. real property
interest (USRPI) as if the taxpayer were
engaged in a trade or business in the
United States, and as if such gain or loss
were effectively connected with such
trade or business under sections 871(b)
or 882. In general, a USRPI includes an
interest in real property located in the
United States or the Virgin Islands, and
any interest (other than an interest
solely as a creditor) in a domestic
corporation unless the taxpayer
establishes that the corporation was at
no time a U.S. real property holding
corporation (USRPHC) within the
period described in section
897(c)(1)(A)(ii). Section 897(c)(1)(A).
Real property includes land and
unsevered natural products of the land,
improvements, and personal property
associated with the use of real property.
Section 1.897–1(b)(1). Section 1.897–
1(b)(1) provides that local law
definitions will not be controlling for
purposes of determining the meaning of
the term ‘‘real property’’ as it is used
under section 897 and the regulations
thereunder. The regulations define an
‘‘improvement’’ as a building, any other
inherently permanent structure, or the
structural components of either. Section
1.897–1(b)(3). For this purpose an
inherently permanent structure includes
any property not otherwise described in
§ 1.897–1(b)(3) that is affixed to real
property and that will ordinarily remain
affixed for an indefinite period of time.
Further, § 1.897–1(b)(3)(iii)(B) provides
that an inherently permanent structure
includes, for example, pavements and
bridges.
The Code defines an ‘‘interest in real
property’’ to include fee ownership and
co-ownership of land or improvements
thereon, leaseholds of land or
improvements thereon, options to
acquire land or improvements thereon,
and options to acquire leaseholds of
land or improvements thereon. Section
897(c)(6)(A). Section 1.897–1(c)(1)
further provides that the term USRPI
also includes any interest, other than an
interest solely as a creditor, in real
property located in the United States or
the Virgin Islands. Section 1.897–
1(d)(2)(i) provides that an interest in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:45 Oct 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
real property other than an interest
solely as a creditor includes any direct
or indirect right to share in the
appreciation in the value, or in the gross
or net proceeds or profits generated by,
the real property.
A USRPHC is generally defined as a
corporation the fair market value of
whose USRPIs equals or exceeds 50
percent of the fair market value of its
worldwide interests in real property,
including its USRPIs, plus its other
assets which are used or held for use in
a trade or business. Section 897(c)(2).
For this purpose, assets used or held for
use in a trade or business include,
among other things, certain intangible
property described in § 1.897–1(f)(1)(ii).
For purposes of determining whether
any corporation is a USRPHC, assets
held by a partnership, trust, or estate are
generally treated as held proportionately
by its partners or beneficiaries. Section
897(c)(4)(B) and § 1.897–2(e)(2). The
interest in the entity itself is disregarded
when a proportionate share of the
entity’s assets are attributed to the
interest-holder. Section 1.897–2(e)(2).
Further, any asset treated as held by a
partner or beneficiary by reason of this
rule which is used or held for use by the
partnership, trust, or estate in a trade or
business is treated as so used or held by
the partner or beneficiary. Section
897(c)(4)(B) and § 1.897–2(e)(2). The
proportionate ownership rules of
Section 897(c)(4)(B) and § 1.897–2(e)(2)
apply successively upward through a
chain of ownership. Section 1.897–
2(e)(2).
Explanation of Contemplated
Regulations
The IRS and the Treasury Department
are aware that in the transactions at
issue taxpayers may be taking the
position that for purposes of section 897
the governmental permit is not a USRPI
within the meaning of section 897(c).
Instead, these taxpayers may take the
position that the governmental permit is
an asset used or held for use in a trade
or business. Further, these taxpayers
may take the position that a significant
portion of the fair market value of a DP’s
assets is allocable to the governmental
permit rather than to the assets
comprising the specified infrastructure.
As noted in the Background section,
under section 897(c)(2), a corporation is
a USRPHC only if the fair market value
of its USRPIs equals or exceeds 50
percent of the fair market value of its
USRPIs plus its interests in real
property located outside the United
States, plus any other of its assets which
are used or held for use in a trade or
business. Therefore, if the fair market
value of the governmental permit were
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
treated as an asset used or held for use
in a trade or business, and not a USRPI,
the governmental permit would be taken
into account in the denominator, but not
the numerator, of the calculation
provided for in section 897(c)(2) in
order to determine whether any
domestic corporation that is a partner in
a DP is a USRPHC. Accounting for the
governmental permit in this manner for
purposes of the section 897(c)(2)
calculation reduces the likelihood that a
domestic corporation to which such a
right was attributed under section
897(c)(4)(B) would be treated as a
USRPHC under section 897(c)(2).
The IRS and the Treasury Department,
however, are of the view that in some
of the transactions at issue the
governmental permit may properly be
characterized as a USRPI. Accordingly,
the IRS and the Treasury Department
are considering issuing proposed
regulations regarding the definition of
an interest in real property that would
address certain licenses, permits,
franchises, or other similar rights
granted by a governmental unit
(including, for purposes of section 897,
an agency or instrumentality thereof)
that are related to the value of the use
or ownership of an interest in real
property. The proposed regulations
would address how the fair market
value of such licenses, permits,
franchises, or other similar rights should
be taken into account when determining
the fair market value of a corporation’s
USRPIs and interests in real property
located outside the United States under
section 897(c)(2).
Proposed Effective Date
The IRS and the Treasury Department
anticipate that the proposed regulations
would apply for transactions occurring
on or after the date of publication in the
Federal Register as final or temporary
regulations. No inference is intended as
to how these arrangements are treated or
characterized under current law.
Request for Comments
Before the notice of proposed
rulemaking is issued, consideration will
be given to any written comments (a
signed original and eight (8) copies) or
electronic comments that are timely
submitted to the IRS. All comments will
be available for public inspection and
copying.
The IRS and Treasury Department
specifically request comments on:
1. The scope of this regulatory project,
the types of licenses, permits,
franchises, or other similar rights
granted by a governmental unit with
respect to specified infrastructure that
might be treated as related to the value
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Proposed Rules
of the lease, ownership, or use of an
interest in real property, and what
characteristics should be taken into
account in making that determination.
2. Whether this regulatory project
should address the allocation of the
consideration paid for the lease or
purchase of a specified infrastructure
and the license, permit, franchise, or
other similar right to operate that
specified infrastructure for purposes of
determining the fair market value of
such property.
In regard to the allocation of purchase
price, comments are also sought as to
whether, for purposes of allocating the
consideration paid for a lease of the
specified infrastructure and the license,
permit, franchise, or other similar right
to operate that specified infrastructure,
the length of the lease (including
whether the lease is for the useful life
of the property) should be taken into
account.
L.E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8–26074 Filed 10–30–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–164370–05]
RIN 1545–BF27
Section 108(e)(8) Application to
Partnerships
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations relating to the
application of section 108(e)(8) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) to
partnerships and their partners. These
regulations provide guidance regarding
the determination of discharge of
indebtedness income of a partnership
that transfers a partnership interest to a
creditor in satisfaction of the
partnership’s indebtedness (debt-forequity exchange). The proposed
regulations also provide that section 721
applies to a contribution of a
partnership’s recourse or nonrecouse
indebtedness by a creditor to the
partnership in exchange for a capital or
profits interest in the partnership. This
document also provides notice of a
public hearing on these proposed
regulations.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:45 Oct 30, 2008
Jkt 217001
Written or electronic comments
must be received by January 29, 2009.
Outlines of topics to be discussed at the
public hearing scheduled for February
19, 2009, must be received by January
27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–164370–05), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be handdelivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–164370–05),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC, or sent
electronically, via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (IRS REG–164370–
05). The public hearing will be held in
the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Megan A. Stoner, Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and
Special Industries), (202) 622–3070;
concerning submission of comments,
the hearing, and/or placed on the
building access list to attend the
hearing, Richard Hurst, (202) 622–2949
(TDD Telephone) (not toll-free numbers)
and his e-mail address is
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to 26 CFR Part 1 under
sections 108 and 721 of the Code
relating to the application of section
108(e)(8) to partnerships.
Section 108(e)(8) was amended by
section 896 of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004, Public Law 108–
357 (118 Stat. 1648), to include
discharges of partnership indebtedness
occurring on or after October 22, 2004.
Prior to the amendment, section
108(e)(8) only applied to discharges of
corporate indebtedness. Section
108(e)(8), as amended, provides that for
purposes of determining income of a
debtor from discharge of indebtedness
(COD income), if a debtor corporation
transfers stock or a debtor partnership
transfers a capital or profits interest in
such partnership to a creditor in
satisfaction of its recourse or
nonrecourse indebtedness, such
corporation or partnership shall be
treated as having satisfied the
indebtedness with an amount of money
equal to the fair market value of the
stock or interest. In the case of a
partnership, any COD income
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64903
recognized under section 108(e)(8) shall
be included in the distributive shares of
the partners in the partnership
immediately before such discharge.
Explanation of Provisions
1. Valuation of Partnership Interest
Transferred in Satisfaction of
Partnership Debt
Section 108(e)(8) provides that for
purposes of determining COD income of
a debtor partnership, the partnership
shall be treated as having satisfied the
indebtedness with an amount of money
equal to the fair market value of the
interest transferred to the creditor. The
amount by which the indebtedness
exceeds the fair market value of the
partnership interest transferred is the
amount of COD income required to be
included in the distributive shares of
the partners in the debtor partnership
immediately before the discharge.
The IRS and the Treasury Department
believe that provided certain
requirements are satisfied, it is
appropriate to allow the partnership and
the creditor to value the partnership
interest transferred to the creditor in a
debt-for-equity exchange (debt-forequity interest) based on liquidation
value. For this purpose, liquidation
value equals the amount of cash that the
creditor would receive with respect to
the debt-for-equity interest if,
immediately after the transfer, the
partnership sold all of its assets
(including goodwill, going concern
value, and any other intangibles
associated with the partnership’s
operations) for cash equal to the fair
market value of those assets, and then
liquidated. If a partnership maintains
capital accounts in accordance with the
capital accounting rules of § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iv), the amount by which the
creditor’s capital account is increased as
a result of the debt-for-equity exchange
will equal the fair market value of the
indebtedness exchanged. See § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iv)(b) and (d).
Accordingly, the proposed regulations
provide that for purposes of applying
section 108(e)(8), the fair market value
of a debt-for-equity interest is the
liquidation value of that debt-for-equity
interest, if (i) the debtor partnership
determines and maintains capital
accounts of its partners in accordance
with the capital accounting rules of
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv), (ii) the creditor,
debtor partnership, and its partners treat
the fair market value of the
indebtedness as being equal to the
liquidation value of the debt-for-equity
interest for purposes of determining the
tax consequences of the debt-for-equity
exchange, (iii) the debt-for-equity
E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM
31OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 212 (Friday, October 31, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64901-64903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-26074]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG-130342-08]
RIN 1545-BI10
Infrastructure Improvements Under Section 897
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Advanced notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document describes issues that the IRS and the Treasury
Department are considering addressing, in a notice of proposed
rulemaking, under section 897 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)
regarding the definition of an interest in real property. The notice of
proposed rulemaking would address certain rights granted by a
governmental unit that are related to the lease, ownership, or use of
real property. This document also invites comments from the public
regarding these contemplated rules. All materials submitted will be
available for public inspection and copying.
DATES: Written and electronic comments must be submitted by January 29,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-130342-08), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
130342-08), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, or sent electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov (IRS and REG-130342-
08).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposals, Jeffrey P.
Cowan at (202) 622-3850; concerning submissions, Richard A. Hurst at
(202) 622-7180 (TDD Telephone) (not toll-free numbers) and his e-mail
address is Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Overview
This document describes issues that the IRS and the Treasury
Department are considering addressing, in a notice of proposed
rulemaking, regarding the definition of an interest in real property
within the meaning of section 897(c) of the Code. The notice of
proposed rulemaking would address certain rights granted by a
governmental unit that are related to the lease, ownership, or use of
toll roads, toll bridges, and certain other physical infrastructure.
The proposed regulations would amend the Sec. 1.897-1 regulations.
Transactions at Issue
In a typical transaction at issue, a domestic partnership (DP)
leases or purchases from an unrelated party infrastructure assets and
any land underlying these infrastructure assets (together, specified
infrastructure) within the United States. The DP's partners include
domestic corporations with foreign shareholders. Examples of specified
infrastructure include a toll road or toll bridge.
Often, as a condition to operating the specified infrastructure and
to collecting tolls for its use, DP is also required to obtain a
governmental license, permit, franchise, or other similar right
(governmental permit). The DP may also own or acquire property that
would be used in the trade or business of operating the specified
infrastructure, such as signs, snow plows, and electronic sensors.
The physical attributes of the specified infrastructure, for
example, a relatively narrow roadway, and terms and conditions related
to the specified infrastructure, for example, that the
[[Page 64902]]
lessee is required to maintain and operate a roadway, mean that in many
cases there may practically be no potential alternative commercial uses
for the specified infrastructure. In those cases, the value of the
leasehold interest in the specified infrastructure derives from the
right to charge and collect tolls.
Background
Section 897(a)(1) of the Code treats the gain or loss of a
nonresident alien or foreign corporation from the disposition of a U.S.
real property interest (USRPI) as if the taxpayer were engaged in a
trade or business in the United States, and as if such gain or loss
were effectively connected with such trade or business under sections
871(b) or 882. In general, a USRPI includes an interest in real
property located in the United States or the Virgin Islands, and any
interest (other than an interest solely as a creditor) in a domestic
corporation unless the taxpayer establishes that the corporation was at
no time a U.S. real property holding corporation (USRPHC) within the
period described in section 897(c)(1)(A)(ii). Section 897(c)(1)(A).
Real property includes land and unsevered natural products of the
land, improvements, and personal property associated with the use of
real property. Section 1.897-1(b)(1). Section 1.897-1(b)(1) provides
that local law definitions will not be controlling for purposes of
determining the meaning of the term ``real property'' as it is used
under section 897 and the regulations thereunder. The regulations
define an ``improvement'' as a building, any other inherently permanent
structure, or the structural components of either. Section 1.897-
1(b)(3). For this purpose an inherently permanent structure includes
any property not otherwise described in Sec. 1.897-1(b)(3) that is
affixed to real property and that will ordinarily remain affixed for an
indefinite period of time. Further, Sec. 1.897-1(b)(3)(iii)(B)
provides that an inherently permanent structure includes, for example,
pavements and bridges.
The Code defines an ``interest in real property'' to include fee
ownership and co-ownership of land or improvements thereon, leaseholds
of land or improvements thereon, options to acquire land or
improvements thereon, and options to acquire leaseholds of land or
improvements thereon. Section 897(c)(6)(A). Section 1.897-1(c)(1)
further provides that the term USRPI also includes any interest, other
than an interest solely as a creditor, in real property located in the
United States or the Virgin Islands. Section 1.897-1(d)(2)(i) provides
that an interest in real property other than an interest solely as a
creditor includes any direct or indirect right to share in the
appreciation in the value, or in the gross or net proceeds or profits
generated by, the real property.
A USRPHC is generally defined as a corporation the fair market
value of whose USRPIs equals or exceeds 50 percent of the fair market
value of its worldwide interests in real property, including its
USRPIs, plus its other assets which are used or held for use in a trade
or business. Section 897(c)(2). For this purpose, assets used or held
for use in a trade or business include, among other things, certain
intangible property described in Sec. 1.897-1(f)(1)(ii).
For purposes of determining whether any corporation is a USRPHC,
assets held by a partnership, trust, or estate are generally treated as
held proportionately by its partners or beneficiaries. Section
897(c)(4)(B) and Sec. 1.897-2(e)(2). The interest in the entity itself
is disregarded when a proportionate share of the entity's assets are
attributed to the interest-holder. Section 1.897-2(e)(2). Further, any
asset treated as held by a partner or beneficiary by reason of this
rule which is used or held for use by the partnership, trust, or estate
in a trade or business is treated as so used or held by the partner or
beneficiary. Section 897(c)(4)(B) and Sec. 1.897-2(e)(2). The
proportionate ownership rules of Section 897(c)(4)(B) and Sec. 1.897-
2(e)(2) apply successively upward through a chain of ownership. Section
1.897-2(e)(2).
Explanation of Contemplated Regulations
The IRS and the Treasury Department are aware that in the
transactions at issue taxpayers may be taking the position that for
purposes of section 897 the governmental permit is not a USRPI within
the meaning of section 897(c). Instead, these taxpayers may take the
position that the governmental permit is an asset used or held for use
in a trade or business. Further, these taxpayers may take the position
that a significant portion of the fair market value of a DP's assets is
allocable to the governmental permit rather than to the assets
comprising the specified infrastructure.
As noted in the Background section, under section 897(c)(2), a
corporation is a USRPHC only if the fair market value of its USRPIs
equals or exceeds 50 percent of the fair market value of its USRPIs
plus its interests in real property located outside the United States,
plus any other of its assets which are used or held for use in a trade
or business. Therefore, if the fair market value of the governmental
permit were treated as an asset used or held for use in a trade or
business, and not a USRPI, the governmental permit would be taken into
account in the denominator, but not the numerator, of the calculation
provided for in section 897(c)(2) in order to determine whether any
domestic corporation that is a partner in a DP is a USRPHC. Accounting
for the governmental permit in this manner for purposes of the section
897(c)(2) calculation reduces the likelihood that a domestic
corporation to which such a right was attributed under section
897(c)(4)(B) would be treated as a USRPHC under section 897(c)(2).
The IRS and the Treasury Department, however, are of the view that
in some of the transactions at issue the governmental permit may
properly be characterized as a USRPI. Accordingly, the IRS and the
Treasury Department are considering issuing proposed regulations
regarding the definition of an interest in real property that would
address certain licenses, permits, franchises, or other similar rights
granted by a governmental unit (including, for purposes of section 897,
an agency or instrumentality thereof) that are related to the value of
the use or ownership of an interest in real property. The proposed
regulations would address how the fair market value of such licenses,
permits, franchises, or other similar rights should be taken into
account when determining the fair market value of a corporation's
USRPIs and interests in real property located outside the United States
under section 897(c)(2).
Proposed Effective Date
The IRS and the Treasury Department anticipate that the proposed
regulations would apply for transactions occurring on or after the date
of publication in the Federal Register as final or temporary
regulations. No inference is intended as to how these arrangements are
treated or characterized under current law.
Request for Comments
Before the notice of proposed rulemaking is issued, consideration
will be given to any written comments (a signed original and eight (8)
copies) or electronic comments that are timely submitted to the IRS.
All comments will be available for public inspection and copying.
The IRS and Treasury Department specifically request comments on:
1. The scope of this regulatory project, the types of licenses,
permits, franchises, or other similar rights granted by a governmental
unit with respect to specified infrastructure that might be treated as
related to the value
[[Page 64903]]
of the lease, ownership, or use of an interest in real property, and
what characteristics should be taken into account in making that
determination.
2. Whether this regulatory project should address the allocation of
the consideration paid for the lease or purchase of a specified
infrastructure and the license, permit, franchise, or other similar
right to operate that specified infrastructure for purposes of
determining the fair market value of such property.
In regard to the allocation of purchase price, comments are also
sought as to whether, for purposes of allocating the consideration paid
for a lease of the specified infrastructure and the license, permit,
franchise, or other similar right to operate that specified
infrastructure, the length of the lease (including whether the lease is
for the useful life of the property) should be taken into account.
L.E. Stiff,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E8-26074 Filed 10-30-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P