Procedures for Children Abducted to the United States; Final Rule, 64539-64540 [E8-25929]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 211 / Thursday, October 30, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
c. The table in paragraph (e) is
amended by removing the entries for:
‘‘6209. 10.0000–6209.20.5035’’, ‘‘6503’’,
and ‘‘9502.91’’;
■ d. The table in paragraph (e) is further
amended by adding, in numericalorder,
■
entries for: ‘‘6209.20.1000–
6209.20.5035’’, and ‘‘9503.00.0080’’;
■ e. The table is further amended by
revising the entries in the ‘‘Tariff
shiftand/or other requirements’’ column
adjacent to the ‘‘HTSUS’’ column listing
64539
for: ‘‘6209.20.1000–6209.20.5035’’,
‘‘6505.90’’, and ‘‘9503.00.0080’’.
The additions read as follows:
§ 102.21
*
*
Textile and apparel products.
*
*
*
HTSUS
Tariff shift and/or other requirements
*
6209.20.1000 ....
6209.20.5035 ....
*
*
*
*
*
*
(1) If the good consists of two or more component parts, a change to an assembled good of subheading 6209.20.1000
through 6209.20.5035 from unassembled components, provided that the change is the result of the good being wholly assembled in a single country, territory, or insular possession.
(2) If the good does not consist of two or more component parts, a change to subheading 6209.20.1000 from any other heading, except from heading 5007, 5111 through 5113, 5208 through 5212, 5309 through 5311, 5407 through 5408, 5512
through 5516, 5602 through 5603, 5801 through 5806, 5809 through 5811, 5903, 5906 through 5907, and 6217, and subheading 6307.90, and provided that the change is the result of a fabric-making process.
*
6505.90 .............
*
*
*
*
*
*
(1) For felt hats and other felt headgear, made from the hat bodies, hoods or plateaux of heading 6501, whether or not lined
or trimmed, if the good consists of two or more components, a change to subheading 6505.90 from any other good of subheading 6505.90 or from any other subheading, provided that the change is the result of the good being wholly assembled
in a single country, territory, or insular possession.
(2) For felt hats and other felt headgear, made from the hat bodies, hoods or plateaux of heading 6501, whether or not lined
or trimmed, if the good does not consist of two or more components, a change to subheading 6505.90 from any other subheading, except from heading 5602, and provided that the change is the result of a fabric-making process.
(3) For any other good, if the good consists of two or more components, a change to subheading 6505.90 from any other
heading, provided that the change is the result of the good being wholly assembled in a single country, territory, or insular
possession.
(4) For any other good, if the good does not consist of two or more components, a change to subheading 6505.90 from any
other heading, except from heading 5007, 5111 through 5113, 5208 through 5212, 5407 through 5408, 5512 through 5516,
5602 through 5603, 5609, 5801 through 5804, 5806, 5808 through 5811, 5903, 5906 through 5907, and 6001 through
6006, and provided that the change is the result of a fabric-making process.
*
9503.00.0080 ....
*
*
*
*
*
*
For garments and accessories thereof, footwear or headgear of dolls representing only human beings, a change to an assembled good from unassembled components, provided that the change is the result of the good being wholly assembled
in a single country, territory, or insular possession.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 23, 2008.
Jayson P. Ahern,
Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection.
[FR Doc. E8–25734 Filed 10–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 94
[Public Notice 6417]
Procedures for Children Abducted to
the United States; Final Rule
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of State is
adopting as a final rule the regulations
regarding incoming parental abduction
cases pursuant to the Hague Convention
on the Civil Aspects of International
Child Abduction. Incoming cases will
be processed by the United States
Central Authority (USCA), the Office of
Children’s Issues in the Bureau of
Consular Affairs within the U.S.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 Oct 29, 2008
Jkt 217001
Department of State or an entity
designated by the USCA.
DATES: This rule is effective October 30,
2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Corrin M. Ferber, CA/OCS/PRI, U.S.
Department of State, Room 4039, 2201
C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520;
telephone: (202) 736–9172 (this is not a
toll free number). Hearing- or speechimpaired persons may use the
Telecommunications Devices for the
Deaf (TDD) by contacting the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These
regulations were originally published as
an interim final rule on August 15,
2008, Volume 73, Number 159, page
47829–47831. No comments were
received and we are adopting these
regulations as final without change.
Since 1988, the Department of State
has served as the United States Central
Authority (USCA) under the Hague
Convention on the Civil Aspects of
International Child Abduction (Hague
Convention). The Office of Children’s
Issues (CI) in the Department’s Bureau
of Consular Affairs serves as the primary
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
point of contact for abduction cases and
is responsible for processing all Hague
Convention applications seeking the
return of children wrongfully removed
or retained in the United States from
any other Hague Convention contracting
state. In addition, CI is responsible for
facilitating access rights under the
Hague Convention. In FY 2007, CI
processed approximately 575 cases
involving 821 children who were
allegedly abducted from or retained
outside the United States in other Hague
contracting countries. Another 355 cases
involving 518 children who were
allegedly abducted to or retained in the
United States from other Hague
contracting countries were also
processed in FY2007 (Hague incoming
cases).
The processing of incoming Hague
Convention applications requires case
officers to communicate with foreign
Central Authorities about incoming
cases, to determine the whereabouts of
children wrongfully taken to the United
States, to attempt to promote the
voluntary return of abducted children,
and to facilitate the initiation of judicial
proceedings with a view toward
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with RULES
64540
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 211 / Thursday, October 30, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
securing the return of abducted
children. Many of the case officer
functions involve extensive contact with
local law enforcement officials, social
service agencies, legal aid organizations
and local bar associations.
22 CFR Part 94 is being amended to
reflect the fact that CI will resume case
officer functions for Hague Convention
cases where a child has been abducted
to or retained in the United States, or
will select an entity to assist the Central
Authority to carry out these obligations.
Since 1996, these functions have been
carried out by the National Center for
Missing and Exploited Children
(NCMEC). See 61 FR 7069 (Feb. 26,
1996); 60 FR 66073 (Dec. 21, 1995). CI
continued to perform the remaining
USCA functions during this time and
retained ultimate responsibility for all
incoming cases, while the Department
of State retained all inherently
governmental functions, including
matters of Hague Convention
interpretation and policy direction. In
March 2008, in an effort to reintegrate
these various USCA functions, CI
significantly modified its agreement
with the Department of Justice’s Office
of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention and NCMEC such that CI
would resume the case officer functions.
This change reflects the expansion of
CI’s capacity to manage the full range of
case officer functions for incoming
Hague abduction cases. During the past
12 years, CI has significantly increased
its capacity to carry out casework,
including its ability to liaise with other
federal agencies; federal, state and local
law enforcement; domestic and foreign
social service agencies, nongovernmental organizations; legal aid
organizations; and local bar
associations. The Office of the Inspector
General (OIG) noted in its 2005 report
that case officers exhibit the necessary
combination of tact, empathy, and
professionalism required to do this
work. Further, it noted that the ability
and commitment of the caseworkers was
evident and well supported by
management team within CI. The
findings of the OIG indicate that CI has
developed the necessary tools to manage
incoming casework since entering into
its initial agreement with NCMEC in
1995. This development, coupled with
CI’s desire to provide consistent,
efficient services to parents, and an
interest in maintaining clear
communications with foreign Central
Authorities, makes this an appropriate
time for CI to resume responsibility for
handling incoming Hague Convention
cases, or, alternatively, to select an
entity to assist in the carrying out of
these functions.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:08 Oct 29, 2008
Jkt 217001
The Department of State originally
published this as an interim final rule
on August 15, 2008, Volume 73,
Number 159, page 47829–47831. No
comments were received.
Regulatory Findings
The Department is publishing this
rule in accordance with the exemption
contained in 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2) for
matters relating to agency management
or personnel. The transfer of
responsibility over incoming Hague
Convention cases back to the Office of
Children’s Issues at the Department of
State primarily affects internal workload
distribution and management of the
USCA functions.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
Since this action is exempt from
notice and comment procedures
contained in 5 U.S.C. 553, and no other
statute mandates such procedures, no
analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is
required. However, these changes to the
regulations are not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
5 U.S.C. 601–612, and Executive Order
13272, section 3(b).
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This final rule is not a major rule, as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of the United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 64, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing or
adopting any rule that may result in an
annual expenditure of $100 million or
more (adjusted annually for inflation) by
state, local, or tribal governments, or by
the private sector. This rule will not
result in any such expenditure nor will
it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Orders No. 12372 and No.
13132. It will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Review
The Department of State does not
consider this final rule to be a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f),
Regulatory Planning and Review. In
addition, the Department is generally
exempt from Executive Order 12866
except to the extent that it is
promulgating regulations in conjunction
with a domestic agency that are
significant regulatory actions. The
Department has nevertheless reviewed
the regulation to ensure its consistency
with the regulatory philosophy and
principles set forth in that Executive
Order.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
The Department has reviewed the
regulations in light of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.,
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from OMB for most collections of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulation. The
Department of State has determined that
this rule does not require new collection
of information for purposes of the PRA.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 94
Infants and children, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 22 CFR Part 94 is amended to
read as follows:
PART 94—INTERNATIONAL CHILD
ABDUCTION
Accordingly, the interim final rule
amending 22 CFR 94 which was
published at 73 FR 47829 on August 15,
2008, is adopted as a final rule without
change.
■
[FR Doc. E8–25929 Filed 10–29–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 211 (Thursday, October 30, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64539-64540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25929]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 94
[Public Notice 6417]
Procedures for Children Abducted to the United States; Final Rule
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State is adopting as a final rule the
regulations regarding incoming parental abduction cases pursuant to the
Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
Incoming cases will be processed by the United States Central Authority
(USCA), the Office of Children's Issues in the Bureau of Consular
Affairs within the U.S. Department of State or an entity designated by
the USCA.
DATES: This rule is effective October 30, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Corrin M. Ferber, CA/OCS/PRI, U.S.
Department of State, Room 4039, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC
20520; telephone: (202) 736-9172 (this is not a toll free number).
Hearing- or speech-impaired persons may use the Telecommunications
Devices for the Deaf (TDD) by contacting the Federal Information Relay
Service at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: These regulations were originally published
as an interim final rule on August 15, 2008, Volume 73, Number 159,
page 47829-47831. No comments were received and we are adopting these
regulations as final without change.
Since 1988, the Department of State has served as the United States
Central Authority (USCA) under the Hague Convention on the Civil
Aspects of International Child Abduction (Hague Convention). The Office
of Children's Issues (CI) in the Department's Bureau of Consular
Affairs serves as the primary point of contact for abduction cases and
is responsible for processing all Hague Convention applications seeking
the return of children wrongfully removed or retained in the United
States from any other Hague Convention contracting state. In addition,
CI is responsible for facilitating access rights under the Hague
Convention. In FY 2007, CI processed approximately 575 cases involving
821 children who were allegedly abducted from or retained outside the
United States in other Hague contracting countries. Another 355 cases
involving 518 children who were allegedly abducted to or retained in
the United States from other Hague contracting countries were also
processed in FY2007 (Hague incoming cases).
The processing of incoming Hague Convention applications requires
case officers to communicate with foreign Central Authorities about
incoming cases, to determine the whereabouts of children wrongfully
taken to the United States, to attempt to promote the voluntary return
of abducted children, and to facilitate the initiation of judicial
proceedings with a view toward
[[Page 64540]]
securing the return of abducted children. Many of the case officer
functions involve extensive contact with local law enforcement
officials, social service agencies, legal aid organizations and local
bar associations.
22 CFR Part 94 is being amended to reflect the fact that CI will
resume case officer functions for Hague Convention cases where a child
has been abducted to or retained in the United States, or will select
an entity to assist the Central Authority to carry out these
obligations. Since 1996, these functions have been carried out by the
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). See 61 FR
7069 (Feb. 26, 1996); 60 FR 66073 (Dec. 21, 1995). CI continued to
perform the remaining USCA functions during this time and retained
ultimate responsibility for all incoming cases, while the Department of
State retained all inherently governmental functions, including matters
of Hague Convention interpretation and policy direction. In March 2008,
in an effort to reintegrate these various USCA functions, CI
significantly modified its agreement with the Department of Justice's
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention and NCMEC such
that CI would resume the case officer functions.
This change reflects the expansion of CI's capacity to manage the
full range of case officer functions for incoming Hague abduction
cases. During the past 12 years, CI has significantly increased its
capacity to carry out casework, including its ability to liaise with
other federal agencies; federal, state and local law enforcement;
domestic and foreign social service agencies, non-governmental
organizations; legal aid organizations; and local bar associations. The
Office of the Inspector General (OIG) noted in its 2005 report that
case officers exhibit the necessary combination of tact, empathy, and
professionalism required to do this work. Further, it noted that the
ability and commitment of the caseworkers was evident and well
supported by management team within CI. The findings of the OIG
indicate that CI has developed the necessary tools to manage incoming
casework since entering into its initial agreement with NCMEC in 1995.
This development, coupled with CI's desire to provide consistent,
efficient services to parents, and an interest in maintaining clear
communications with foreign Central Authorities, makes this an
appropriate time for CI to resume responsibility for handling incoming
Hague Convention cases, or, alternatively, to select an entity to
assist in the carrying out of these functions.
The Department of State originally published this as an interim
final rule on August 15, 2008, Volume 73, Number 159, page 47829-47831.
No comments were received.
Regulatory Findings
The Department is publishing this rule in accordance with the
exemption contained in 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2) for matters relating to
agency management or personnel. The transfer of responsibility over
incoming Hague Convention cases back to the Office of Children's Issues
at the Department of State primarily affects internal workload
distribution and management of the USCA functions.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
Since this action is exempt from notice and comment procedures
contained in 5 U.S.C. 553, and no other statute mandates such
procedures, no analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.) is required. However, these changes to the regulations are
not expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612, and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b).
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This final rule is not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804,
for purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law
104-121. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of the United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 64, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires
agencies to prepare a statement before proposing or adopting any rule
that may result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) by state, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector. This rule will not result in any
such expenditure nor will it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
This rule does not have federalism implications warranting the
application of Executive Orders No. 12372 and No. 13132. It will not
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review
The Department of State does not consider this final rule to be a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, section
3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review. In addition, the Department is
generally exempt from Executive Order 12866 except to the extent that
it is promulgating regulations in conjunction with a domestic agency
that are significant regulatory actions. The Department has
nevertheless reviewed the regulation to ensure its consistency with the
regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in that Executive Order.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq., Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for most
collections of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through
regulation. The Department of State has determined that this rule does
not require new collection of information for purposes of the PRA.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 94
Infants and children, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Treaties.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 22 CFR Part 94 is amended to
read as follows:
PART 94--INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 22 CFR 94 which was
published at 73 FR 47829 on August 15, 2008, is adopted as a final rule
without change.
[FR Doc. E8-25929 Filed 10-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P