Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge, Georgetown, Horry, and Marion Counties, SC, 64361-64363 [E8-25840]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 29, 2008 / Notices
become part of the official
administrative record and may be made
available to the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Marquez, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, see ADDRESSES, (telephone:
760–431–9440; fax: 760–431–9624).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following applicants have applied for
scientific research permits to conduct
certain activities with endangered
species pursuant to section 10(a)(1)(A)
of the Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (‘‘we’’) solicits review
and comment from local, State, and
Federal agencies, and the public on the
following permit requests. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Permit No. TE–195251
Applicant: Christopher B. Clifford,
Davis, California
The applicant requests a permit to
take (capture, collect, and kill) the
Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
conservatio), the longhorn fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta longiantenna), the
Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus
wootoni), the San Diego fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta sandiegonensis), and the
vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus
packardi) in conjunction with surveys
throughout the range of each species in
California for the purpose of enhancing
their survival.
Permit No. TE–195286
Applicant: Scott T. Cashen, Walnut
Creek, California
The applicant requests a permit to
take (survey and set up remote camera
systems) the Peninsular bighorn sheep
(Ovis canadensis) in conjunction with
population and demographic research
studies within Imperial County,
California for the purpose of enhancing
its survival.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Permit No. TE–195305
Applicant: Andres Aguilar, Merced,
California
The applicant requests a permit to
take (capture, collect, and kill) the
vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus
packardi) in conjunction with surveys
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Oct 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
and genetic research within Merced
County, California for the purpose of
enhancing their survival.
Permit No. TE–195306
Applicant: Riley J. Swift, Rocklin,
California
The applicant requests a permit to
take (capture, collect, and kill) the
Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
conservatio), the longhorn fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta longiantenna), the
Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus
wootoni), the San Diego fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta sandiegonensis), and the
vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus
packardi) in conjunction with surveys
throughout the range of each species in
California and within Jackson and
Klamath Counties in Oregon for the
purpose of enhancing their survival.
Permit No. TE–195304
Applicant: Michael J. Farmer, Rancho
Cordova, California
The applicant requests a permit to
take (capture, collect, and kill) the
Conservancy fairy shrimp (Branchinecta
conservatio), the longhorn fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta longiantenna), the
Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus
wootoni), the San Diego fairy shrimp
(Branchinecta sandiegonensis), and the
vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus
packardi) in conjunction with surveys
throughout the range of each species in
California for the purpose of enhancing
their survival.
Permit No. TE–195891
The applicant requests a permit to
remove/remove to possession the
Erysimum capitatum var. angustatum
(Contra Costa wallflower) from federal
lands in conjunction with genetic
sampling for the purpose of enhancing
their survival.
Permit No. TE–117947
Applicant: Kevin B. Clark, San Diego,
California
The applicant requests an amendment
to take (play taped vocalizations) the
lease Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus)
in conjunction with surveys and
monitoring, and take (survey by pursuit)
the Quino checkerspot butterfly
(Euphydryas editha quino) in
conjunction with surveys throughout
the range of each species within the
jurisdiction of the Carlsbad Fish and
Wildlife Office, in California for the
purpose of enhancing its survival.
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Permit No. TE–807078
Applicant: Point Reyes Bird Observatory
Conservation Services, Petaluma,
California
The applicant requests an amendment
to take (locate/monitor nests) the
California clapper rail (Rallus
longirostris obsoletus) in conjunction
with surveys and population monitoring
studies within Marin, Sonoma, Napa,
Solano, and Contra Costa Counties,
California, for the purpose of enhancing
its survival.
We solicit public review and
comment on each of these recovery
permit applications. Comments and
materials we receive will be available
for public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours at the
address listed in the ADDRESSES section
of this notice.
Dated: October 23, 2008.
Michael Fris,
Acting Regional Director, Region 8,
Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. E8–25772 Filed 10–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2008–N0195; 40136–1265–
0000–S3]
Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge,
Georgetown, Horry, and Marion
Counties, SC
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: final
comprehensive conservation plan and
finding of no significant impact.
AGENCY:
Applicant: Dr. Justen B. Whittall, Santa
Clara, California
PO 00000
64361
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for
Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge. In
the final CCP, we describe how we will
manage this refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the CCP may be
obtained by writing to: Waccamaw
National Wildlife Refuge, 1601 North
Fraser Street, Georgetown, SC 29440.
The plan may also be accessed and
downloaded from the Service’s Web
site: https://southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Craig Sasser, Refuge Manager,
Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge;
Telephone: 843/527–8069; Fax: 843/
527–8494.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
64362
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 29, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for Waccamaw National
Wildlife Refuge. We started this process
through a notice in the Federal Register
on March 29, 2006 (71 FR 15757). For
more about the process, see that notice.
Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge
is currently 18,251 acres in size (within
an approved acquisition boundary of
54,000 acres), and was established in
1997 for the following purposes: (1) To
protect and manage diverse habitat
components within an important coastal
river ecosystem for the benefit of
threatened and endangered species,
freshwater and anadromous fish,
migratory birds, and forest wildlife,
including a wide array of plants and
animals associated with bottomland
hardwood habitats; and (2) to provide
compatible wildlife-dependent
recreational activities, including
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
wildlife photography, and
environmental education and
interpretation.
The refuge acquisition boundary
includes large sections of the
Waccamaw and Great Pee Dee Rivers
and a small section of the Little Pee Dee
River. The wetland diversity of this
refuge is what distinguishes it from
most others found along the east coast.
Wetland habitats range from historic,
broken, and actively managed tidal rice
fields, to black water and alluvial
floodplain forested wetlands. These
tidal freshwater wetlands are some of
the most diverse freshwater wetland
systems found in North America and
they offer many important habitats for
migratory birds, fish, and resident
wildlife.
Over 400 species of animals are
supported by the variety of habitats in
the refuge acquisition area, including
several endangered species. Birds, such
as the swallow-tailed kite, osprey, wood
stork, white ibis, prothonotary warbler,
and many species of waterfowl, can be
observed on a seasonal basis, while
mammals, such as the American black
bear, frequent the refuge’s forests yearround. Notably, the refuge acquisition
area supports the highest density of
nesting swallow-tailed kites in South
Carolina and is the northernmost
documented nesting area for this raptor
within its range.
Additionally, the refuge’s wetlands
play a critical role in the filtration and
storm water retention of the primary
drinking water resource for the greater
Grand Strand region.
Popular recreation uses of the refuge
include hunting and both recreational
and commercial fishing. Wildlife
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Oct 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
viewing and photography programs, as
well as environmental education and
interpretation, are also being developed
on the refuge, especially in conjunction
with a visitor center now under
construction.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the final CCP and FONSI
for Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We
completed a thorough analysis of
impacts on the human environment,
which we included in the draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment (Draft CCP/
EA).
The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering Waccamaw National
Wildlife Refuge for the next 15 years.
Alternative C, as we described in the
final CCP, is the foundation for the CCP.
The compatibility determinations for
(1) Hunting; (2) fishing; (3) wildlife
observation and photography; (4)
environmental education and
interpretation; (5) bicycling; (6)
commercial services; (7) commercial
fishing; (8) research; (9) camping; (10)
rights-of-way; and (11) forest
management—commercial timber
harvest are also available within the
final CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Improvement Act),
which amended the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Improvement Act.
Comments
Approximately 200 copies of the Draft
CCP/EA were made available for a 30day public review period as announced
in the Federal Register on February 13,
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2008 (73 FR 8343). Ninety-four written
comments were received from private
citizens and a number of nongovernmental organizations, including
American Rivers, Baruch Marine Field
Laboratory (University of South
Carolina), Charleston Audubon, Coastal
Conservation League, Coastal
Expeditions, Five Rivers Coalition,
Georgetown County League of Women
Voters, Grand Strand Surfrider
Foundation, Historic Charleston
Foundation, Morgan Park Committee,
National Rifle Association of America,
The Nature Conservancy, Palmetto
Conservation Foundation, Republican
Women of Myrtle Beach, SEWEE
Association, Swallow-tailed Kite
Conservation Alliance, Waccamaw
Watershed Academy (Coastal Carolina
University), Waccamaw Audubon
Society, and Winyah Rivers Foundation.
Almost all commenters supported the
Service’s proposed alternative,
Alternative D.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we
received, we have selected Alternative D
for implementation. This alternative is
judged to be the most effective
management action for meeting the
purposes of the refuge by optimizing
habitat management and visitor services
throughout the refuge. The Service
would aim to improve wintering
waterfowl habitat on approximately 600
acres on Unit 1 by restoring hydrology.
We would also continue to conduct
informal surveys on swallow-tailed kites
and Swainson’s warblers on an
occasional basis. Management of black
bears would be stepped up, and would
include annual surveys and enlisting
public participation in gathering,
recording, and compiling sightings.
Management of threatened and
endangered species would involve
restoring the hydrology on Unit 1 to
enhance the existing wood stork
rookery, restoring wood stork feeding
areas on Unit 3, and red-cockaded
woodpecker nesting and foraging habitat
on Unit 2. Recreational use of the refuge
would continue. This alternative would
expand on hunting opportunities for
deer and hog by considering a hunt by
mobility-impaired individuals. It would
potentially include a youth waterfowl
hunt on refuge management lands. Over
the lifetime of the CCP, this alternative
would call for reducing deer herd
density to improve herd health and to
improve habitat quality for other
species.
This alternative would identify the
4,600-acre Bull Island as a proposed
Wilderness Study Area. The Service
would maintain its wilderness
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 29, 2008 / Notices
character, and within 10 years of
approval of the CCP, would prepare a
wilderness study report and additional
NEPA documentation on whether Bull
Island should be formally designated by
Congress as a unit of the National
Wilderness Preservation System. The
refuge would prepare and implement a
Visitor Services’ Plan and expand most
wildlife-dependent public uses in a
number of ways.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: July 22, 2008.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on October 24, 2008.
[FR Doc. E8–25840 Filed 10–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–R–2008–N0217; 40136–1265–
0000–S3]
Pee Dee National Wildlife Refuge,
Anson and Richmond Counties, NC
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Final
comprehensive conservation plan and
finding of no significant impact.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and finding of
no significant impact (FONSI) for Pee
Dee National Wildlife Refuge. In the
final CCP, we describe how we will
manage this refuge for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the CCP may be
obtained by writing to: Jeffrey Bricken,
Refuge Manager, Pee Dee National
Wildlife Refuge, 5770 U.S. Highway 52
North, Wadesboro, NC 28170. The CCP
may also be accessed and downloaded
from the Service’s Internet Site: https://
southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Bricken; telephone: 704/694–
4424.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP
process for Pee Dee National Wildlife
Refuge. We started this process through
a notice of intent in the Federal Register
on November 7, 2006 (71 FR 65122). For
more about the process, see that notice.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:17 Oct 28, 2008
Jkt 217001
Established in 1963, Pee Dee National
Wildlife Refuge is located
approximately 48 miles east of
Charlotte, North Carolina, in Anson and
Richmond Counties. The 8,433-acre
refuge includes a diversity of habitats
consisting of bottomland hardwoods,
upland pine forests, croplands, open
fields, moist-soil units, and mixed-pine
hardwoods. These areas support a
variety of wildlife and plant species,
including waterfowl and other
migratory birds, as well as federal- and
state-listed species. Pee Dee National
Wildlife Refuge straddles several miles
of the Pee Dee River, and contains
numerous creeks, lakes, and ponds. In
addition, the refuge protects historical
and archaeological sites.
We announce our decision and the
availability of the final CCP and FONSI
for Pee Dee National Wildlife Refuge in
accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements. We
completed a thorough analysis of
impacts on the human environment,
which we included in the draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment (Draft CCP/
EA).
The CCP will guide us in managing
and administering Pee Dee National
Wildlife Refuge for the next 15 years.
Alternative C, as we described in the
final CCP, is the foundation for the CCP.
The compatibility determinations for
(1) boating; (2) deer and feral hog
hunting; (3) turkey hunting; (4) small
game hunting; (5) fishing; (6) wildlife
observation and photography; (7)
environmental education and
interpretation; (8) bicycling and jogging;
(9) horseback riding; (10) forest
management/timber harvest; and (11)
cooperative farming are also available in
the CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Improvement Act),
which amended the National Wildlife
Refuge System Administration Act of
1966, requires us to develop a CCP for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose for developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
plan for achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64363
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least
every 15 years in accordance with the
Improvement Act.
Comments
We solicited comments on the Draft
CCP/EA for a 30-day period as
announced in the Federal Register on
April 22, 2008 (73 FR 21641). All
comments were analyzed and changes
were made to the CCP where warranted.
Selected Alternative
The Draft CCP/EA identified and
evaluated three alternatives for
managing the refuge. After considering
the comments we received and based on
the professional judgment of the
planning team, we have selected
Alternative C for implementation.
Under this alternative, refuge
management will focus on maintaining
biodiversity, restoring habitats,
improving conditions for threatened and
endangered species, and increasing
public use opportunities.
Authority: This notice is published under
the authority of the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997, Public
Law 105–57.
Dated: August 25, 2008.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E8–25778 Filed 10–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[UT–LLUT02000–08–14300000–FR0000–
241A.00; UTU–66588–02]
Recreation & Public Purposes Act
Classification; Utah
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Realty Action.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has determined that
public lands in Tooele County, Utah
have been examined and found suitable
for classification for conveyance to the
City of Wendover, Utah under the
provisions of the Recreation and Public
Purposes Act, as amended (43 U.S.C.
869).
Comments regarding the
proposed conveyance must be received
by the BLM on or before December 15,
2008. Comments should reference the
serial number UTU–66588–02.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64361-64363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25840]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-R-2008-N0195; 40136-1265-0000-S3]
Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge, Georgetown, Horry, and Marion
Counties, SC
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: final comprehensive conservation plan
and finding of no significant impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of our final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for Waccamaw National Wildlife
Refuge. In the final CCP, we describe how we will manage this refuge
for the next 15 years.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the CCP may be obtained by writing to: Waccamaw
National Wildlife Refuge, 1601 North Fraser Street, Georgetown, SC
29440. The plan may also be accessed and downloaded from the Service's
Web site: https://southeast.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Craig Sasser, Refuge Manager,
Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge; Telephone: 843/527-8069; Fax: 843/
527-8494.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 64362]]
Introduction
With this notice, we finalize the CCP process for Waccamaw National
Wildlife Refuge. We started this process through a notice in the
Federal Register on March 29, 2006 (71 FR 15757). For more about the
process, see that notice.
Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge is currently 18,251 acres in size
(within an approved acquisition boundary of 54,000 acres), and was
established in 1997 for the following purposes: (1) To protect and
manage diverse habitat components within an important coastal river
ecosystem for the benefit of threatened and endangered species,
freshwater and anadromous fish, migratory birds, and forest wildlife,
including a wide array of plants and animals associated with bottomland
hardwood habitats; and (2) to provide compatible wildlife-dependent
recreational activities, including hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and
interpretation.
The refuge acquisition boundary includes large sections of the
Waccamaw and Great Pee Dee Rivers and a small section of the Little Pee
Dee River. The wetland diversity of this refuge is what distinguishes
it from most others found along the east coast. Wetland habitats range
from historic, broken, and actively managed tidal rice fields, to black
water and alluvial floodplain forested wetlands. These tidal freshwater
wetlands are some of the most diverse freshwater wetland systems found
in North America and they offer many important habitats for migratory
birds, fish, and resident wildlife.
Over 400 species of animals are supported by the variety of
habitats in the refuge acquisition area, including several endangered
species. Birds, such as the swallow-tailed kite, osprey, wood stork,
white ibis, prothonotary warbler, and many species of waterfowl, can be
observed on a seasonal basis, while mammals, such as the American black
bear, frequent the refuge's forests year-round. Notably, the refuge
acquisition area supports the highest density of nesting swallow-tailed
kites in South Carolina and is the northernmost documented nesting area
for this raptor within its range.
Additionally, the refuge's wetlands play a critical role in the
filtration and storm water retention of the primary drinking water
resource for the greater Grand Strand region.
Popular recreation uses of the refuge include hunting and both
recreational and commercial fishing. Wildlife viewing and photography
programs, as well as environmental education and interpretation, are
also being developed on the refuge, especially in conjunction with a
visitor center now under construction.
We announce our decision and the availability of the final CCP and
FONSI for Waccamaw National Wildlife Refuge in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR 1506.6(b))
requirements. We completed a thorough analysis of impacts on the human
environment, which we included in the draft comprehensive conservation
plan and environmental assessment (Draft CCP/EA).
The CCP will guide us in managing and administering Waccamaw
National Wildlife Refuge for the next 15 years. Alternative C, as we
described in the final CCP, is the foundation for the CCP.
The compatibility determinations for (1) Hunting; (2) fishing; (3)
wildlife observation and photography; (4) environmental education and
interpretation; (5) bicycling; (6) commercial services; (7) commercial
fishing; (8) research; (9) camping; (10) rights-of-way; and (11) forest
management--commercial timber harvest are also available within the
final CCP.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Improvement Act), which amended the National
Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, requires us to
develop a CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose for
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year plan for
achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles of
fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Improvement Act.
Comments
Approximately 200 copies of the Draft CCP/EA were made available
for a 30-day public review period as announced in the Federal Register
on February 13, 2008 (73 FR 8343). Ninety-four written comments were
received from private citizens and a number of non-governmental
organizations, including American Rivers, Baruch Marine Field
Laboratory (University of South Carolina), Charleston Audubon, Coastal
Conservation League, Coastal Expeditions, Five Rivers Coalition,
Georgetown County League of Women Voters, Grand Strand Surfrider
Foundation, Historic Charleston Foundation, Morgan Park Committee,
National Rifle Association of America, The Nature Conservancy, Palmetto
Conservation Foundation, Republican Women of Myrtle Beach, SEWEE
Association, Swallow-tailed Kite Conservation Alliance, Waccamaw
Watershed Academy (Coastal Carolina University), Waccamaw Audubon
Society, and Winyah Rivers Foundation. Almost all commenters supported
the Service's proposed alternative, Alternative D.
Selected Alternative
After considering the comments we received, we have selected
Alternative D for implementation. This alternative is judged to be the
most effective management action for meeting the purposes of the refuge
by optimizing habitat management and visitor services throughout the
refuge. The Service would aim to improve wintering waterfowl habitat on
approximately 600 acres on Unit 1 by restoring hydrology. We would also
continue to conduct informal surveys on swallow-tailed kites and
Swainson's warblers on an occasional basis. Management of black bears
would be stepped up, and would include annual surveys and enlisting
public participation in gathering, recording, and compiling sightings.
Management of threatened and endangered species would involve
restoring the hydrology on Unit 1 to enhance the existing wood stork
rookery, restoring wood stork feeding areas on Unit 3, and red-cockaded
woodpecker nesting and foraging habitat on Unit 2. Recreational use of
the refuge would continue. This alternative would expand on hunting
opportunities for deer and hog by considering a hunt by mobility-
impaired individuals. It would potentially include a youth waterfowl
hunt on refuge management lands. Over the lifetime of the CCP, this
alternative would call for reducing deer herd density to improve herd
health and to improve habitat quality for other species.
This alternative would identify the 4,600-acre Bull Island as a
proposed Wilderness Study Area. The Service would maintain its
wilderness
[[Page 64363]]
character, and within 10 years of approval of the CCP, would prepare a
wilderness study report and additional NEPA documentation on whether
Bull Island should be formally designated by Congress as a unit of the
National Wilderness Preservation System. The refuge would prepare and
implement a Visitor Services' Plan and expand most wildlife-dependent
public uses in a number of ways.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Public Law
105-57.
Dated: July 22, 2008.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the
Federal Register on October 24, 2008.
[FR Doc. E8-25840 Filed 10-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P