Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Airplanes, 64284-64286 [E8-25758]
Download as PDF
64284
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
(1) Within the next 3 months after the
effective date of this AD and repetitively
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 12
months, visually inspect the control bridge in
areas of juncture with the two control sticks
for cracks. Do the inspection following
paragraph A of LET Aircraft Industries, a.s.
Mandatory Bulletin MB No. L23/050a
Revision No. 2, dated September 12, 2007,
except use a 10X magnifier and do a dye
penetrant inspection following the
procedures in chapter 5, section 5, of FAA
Advisory Circular AC 43.13–1B CHG 1, dated
September 27, 2001.
(2) If cracks are found in the control bridge
bedding during any inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further
flight, replace the defective control bridge
bedding, Dwg. No. A740 371N, in the control
bridge assembly, Dwg. No. A740 370N,
following LET Aircraft Industries, a.s.
Mandatory Bulletin MB No. L23/050a
Revision No. 2, dated September 12, 2007;
and Appendix No. 1, ‘‘Replacement of
Bearings 608 CSN 024630 at Control Bridge
Dwg. No. A740 370N in a Bedding Dwg. No.
A740 371N,’’ to LET Aircraft Industries, a.s.
Mandatory Bulletin MB No. L23/050a
Revision No. 2, dated September 12, 2007.
(3) Doing the replacement required in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD terminates the 12month repetitive inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD. After the
replacement required in paragraph (f)(2) of
this AD, perform subsequent inspections on
the new control bridge assembly according to
LET Aircraft Industries, a.s. Documentation
Bulletin No.: L23/020 d, dated August 6,
2007.
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2007–0261,
dated October 2, 2007; LET Aircraft
Industries, a.s. Mandatory Bulletin MB No.
L23/050a Revision No. 2, dated September
12, 2007; Appendix No. 1, ‘‘Replacement of
Bearings 608 CSN 024630 at Control Bridge
Dwg. No. A740 370N in a Bedding Dwg. No.
A740 371N,’’ to LET Aircraft Industries, a.s.
Mandatory Bulletin MB No. L23/050a
Revision No. 2, dated September 12, 2007;
and LET Aircraft Industries, a.s.
Documentation Bulletin No.: L23/020 d,
dated August 6, 2007, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
October 21, 2008.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–25661 Filed 10–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FAA AD Differences
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows:
1. The service information requires a visual
inspection with a 6X magnifier. We are
requiring a dye penetrant inspection and a
10X magnifier to detect cracks that could go
undetected using only a 6X magnifier.
2. The MCAI requires updating the
maintenance manuals to add repetitive
inspections of the control bridge. Since the
maintenance manual is only one way of
establishing a maintenance program, the only
way we can mandate these repetitive
inspections is through an AD action.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Greg Davison, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4130; fax: (816) 329–
4090. Before using any approved AMOC on
any sailplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Oct 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–1117; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–106–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 727 Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 727 airplanes. This
proposed AD would require inspections
for cracking of the left- and right-side
shear ties and web posts of the kickload
beam and the adjacent structure in the
vertical stabilizer, and corrective actions
if necessary. This proposed AD results
from a report of cracking of the left- and
right-side web posts and shear ties of
the kickload beam. We are proposing
this AD to detect and correct cracking of
the left- and right-side web posts and
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
shear ties of the kickload beam, which,
when coupled with failures in the
adjacent structure, could result in
structural failure of the vertical
stabilizer, and loss of control of the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by December 15,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124–2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6577; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–1117; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–106–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report of cracking
of the left- and right-side web posts and
shear ties of the kickload beam. The
cracking was discovered during a
scheduled maintenance visit of an
airplane with 65,000 total flight hours
and 42,000 total flight cycles. The
reported cracking of the left- and rightside web posts, which attach to the
kickload beam and the left- and rightside stringer 11 in the vertical stabilizer,
was due to stress corrosion caused by
elevated fit up stress. Cracking in the
left- and right-side shear ties, which
attach to the kickload beam, was a result
of fatigue caused by compensation for
cracking in the web posts. Cracking of
the shear ties and web posts can
diminish the effectiveness of both leftand right-side stringer 11. When
coupled with failures in the rear spar
chord or stringer 10, the critical crack
length at which limit load can be
sustained is reduced, rendering the
existing inspection intervals for stringer
10 and the rear spar chord insufficient.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in structural failure of the vertical
stabilizer, which could lead to loss of
control of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 727–55–
0093, dated March 12, 2008. The service
bulletin describes procedures for doing
repetitive high frequency eddy current
64285
(HFEC) and low frequency eddy current
(LFEC) inspections for cracking of the
left- and right-side shear ties, left- and
right-side web posts, left- and right-side
stringers 10 and 11, rear spar chord,
associated critical fasteners, and
adjacent surfaces in the vertical
stabilizer. For airplanes on which any
cracking is found in the shear ties or
web posts, the service bulletin describes
replacing the cracked parts with new
parts and inspecting all open fastener
holes in the kickload beam web and
chords for cracking. For airplanes on
which cracking is found in stringer 10
or 11, rear spar chord and skin,
associated critical fasteners, adjacent
surfaces of the vertical stabilizer, or
areas other than the shear ties and web
posts, the service bulletin specifies
contacting Boeing for repair
instructions. The service bulletin
specifies the following compliance
times:
COMPLIANCE TIMES
Airplanes/condition
Compliance time
(whichever occurs first)
Less than 52,000 total flight hours
or 39,000 total flight cycles.
More than 52,000 total flight hours
or 39,000 total flight cycles.
Any cracking found ........................
Repetitive interval
Before 56,000 total flight hours ....
Before 42,000 total flight cycles ...
Within 4,000 flight hours after the
date of the service bulletin.
Before further flight .......................
Within 3,000 flight cycles after the
date of the service bulletin.
.......................................................
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all relevant information and
determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the(se)
same type design(s). This proposed AD
would require accomplishing the
actions specified in the service
information described previously,
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between the Proposed AD and the
Service Bulletin.’’
Differences Between the Proposed AD
and the Service Bulletin
Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 727–55–0093, dated March 12,
2008, specifies to contact the
manufacturer for instructions on how to
repair certain conditions, but this
proposed AD would require repairing
those conditions in one of the following
ways:
• Using a method that we approve; or
• Using data that meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
that have been approved by an
Authorized Representative for the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization
Organization, whom we have authorized
to make those findings.
The service bulletin does not specify
a compliance time for airplanes with
exactly 52,000 total flight hours or
39,000 total flight cycles. We have
10,000 flight hours or 7,500 flight
cycles, whichever occurs first.
10,000 flight hours or 7,500 flight
cycles, whichever occurs first.
(None).
grouped those airplanes with airplanes
having ‘‘less than’’ 52,000 total flight
hours or 39,000 total flight cycles, as
specified in paragraph (g) of this
proposed AD.
Interim Action
We consider this proposed AD
interim action. If final action is later
identified, we might consider further
rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 364 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The following table provides
the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this proposed AD.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
ESTIMATED COSTS
Inspection ................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Average
labor rate
per hour
Work
hours
Action
15:29 Oct 28, 2008
10
Jkt 214001
$80
PO 00000
$0
Number
of U.S.registered
airplanes
Cost per
product
Parts
$800, per inspection cycle .............
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
364
Fleet cost
$291,200, per inspection cycle.
29OCP1
64286
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 29, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Oct 28, 2008
Jkt 214001
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA–2008–1117;
Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–106–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by
December 15, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model
727, 727C, 727–100, 727 –100C, 727–200,
and 727–200F series airplanes, certificated in
any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of
cracking of the left- and right-side web posts
and shear ties of the kickload beam. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking
of the left- and right-side web posts and shear
ties of the kickload beam, which, when
coupled with failures in the adjacent
structure, could result in structural failure of
the vertical stabilizer, and loss of control of
the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Inspections and Corrective Actions
(f) At the times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 727–55–0093, dated March
12, 2008 (‘‘the service bulletin’’), except as
provided by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this
AD: Do the inspections to detect cracking of
the left- and right-side web posts and shear
ties of the kickload beam, by doing all of the
actions specified in Part 2 and the applicable
corrective actions specified in Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service
bulletin, except as provided by paragraph (i)
of this AD. Do all applicable corrective
actions before further flight. Repeat the
inspections thereafter at the intervals
specified in paragraph 1.E. of the service
bulletin.
Exception to the Specified Corrective
Actions
(i) If any cracking is found during any
inspection required by this AD, and Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 727–55–
0093, dated March 12, 2008, specifies
contacting Boeing for appropriate action:
Before further flight, repair the cracking or
damage using a method approved by the
Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be
approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as
required by this paragraph, the Manager’s
approval letter must specifically refer to this
AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA,
ATTN: Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–
3356; telephone (425) 917–6577; fax (425)
917–6590; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option
Authorization Organization who has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to
be approved, the repair must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
10, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–25758 Filed 10–28–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Clarification and Exception to the Specified
Compliance Times
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
(g) To determine the compliance times for
airplanes having exactly 52,000 total flight
hours or 39,000 total flight cycles, for the
purposes of this AD, these airplanes are
grouped with airplanes having ‘‘less than’’
52,000 total flight hours or 39,000 total flight
cycles, as specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 727–55–0093, dated March
12, 2008.
(h) Where Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 727–55–0093, dated March 12, 2008,
specifies a compliance time after the date on
the service bulletin, this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance
time after the effective date of this AD.
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2008–0009; Notice No. 91;
Re: Notice No. 90]
RIN 1513–AB57
Proposed Expansions of the Russian
River Valley and Northern Sonoma
Viticultural Areas; Reopening of
Comment Period
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 29, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64284-64286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25758]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-1117; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-106-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 727 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 727 airplanes. This proposed AD would require inspections
for cracking of the left- and right-side shear ties and web posts of
the kickload beam and the adjacent structure in the vertical
stabilizer, and corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD
results from a report of cracking of the left- and right-side web posts
and shear ties of the kickload beam. We are proposing this AD to detect
and correct cracking of the left- and right-side web posts and shear
ties of the kickload beam, which, when coupled with failures in the
adjacent structure, could result in structural failure of the vertical
stabilizer, and loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 15,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Berhane Alazar, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6577; fax (425) 917-6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1117;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-106-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will
[[Page 64285]]
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received a report of cracking of the left- and right-side
web posts and shear ties of the kickload beam. The cracking was
discovered during a scheduled maintenance visit of an airplane with
65,000 total flight hours and 42,000 total flight cycles. The reported
cracking of the left- and right-side web posts, which attach to the
kickload beam and the left- and right-side stringer 11 in the vertical
stabilizer, was due to stress corrosion caused by elevated fit up
stress. Cracking in the left- and right-side shear ties, which attach
to the kickload beam, was a result of fatigue caused by compensation
for cracking in the web posts. Cracking of the shear ties and web posts
can diminish the effectiveness of both left- and right-side stringer
11. When coupled with failures in the rear spar chord or stringer 10,
the critical crack length at which limit load can be sustained is
reduced, rendering the existing inspection intervals for stringer 10
and the rear spar chord insufficient. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in structural failure of the vertical stabilizer, which
could lead to loss of control of the airplane.
Relevant Service Information
We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 727-55-
0093, dated March 12, 2008. The service bulletin describes procedures
for doing repetitive high frequency eddy current (HFEC) and low
frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections for cracking of the left- and
right-side shear ties, left- and right-side web posts, left- and right-
side stringers 10 and 11, rear spar chord, associated critical
fasteners, and adjacent surfaces in the vertical stabilizer. For
airplanes on which any cracking is found in the shear ties or web
posts, the service bulletin describes replacing the cracked parts with
new parts and inspecting all open fastener holes in the kickload beam
web and chords for cracking. For airplanes on which cracking is found
in stringer 10 or 11, rear spar chord and skin, associated critical
fasteners, adjacent surfaces of the vertical stabilizer, or areas other
than the shear ties and web posts, the service bulletin specifies
contacting Boeing for repair instructions. The service bulletin
specifies the following compliance times:
Compliance Times
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplanes/condition Compliance time Repetitive interval
(whichever occurs first)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than 52,000 total flight hours Before 56,000 total Before 42,000 total 10,000 flight hours or
or 39,000 total flight cycles. flight hours. flight cycles. 7,500 flight cycles,
whichever occurs
first.
More than 52,000 total flight hours Within 4,000 flight Within 3,000 flight 10,000 flight hours or
or 39,000 total flight cycles. hours after the date cycles after the date 7,500 flight cycles,
of the service of the service whichever occurs
bulletin. bulletin. first.
Any cracking found................... Before further flight.. ....................... (None).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the(se) same type
design(s). This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions
specified in the service information described previously, except as
discussed under ``Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service
Bulletin.''
Differences Between the Proposed AD and the Service Bulletin
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 727-55-0093, dated March
12, 2008, specifies to contact the manufacturer for instructions on how
to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD would require
repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
Using a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by an Authorized Representative
for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization
Organization, whom we have authorized to make those findings.
The service bulletin does not specify a compliance time for
airplanes with exactly 52,000 total flight hours or 39,000 total flight
cycles. We have grouped those airplanes with airplanes having ``less
than'' 52,000 total flight hours or 39,000 total flight cycles, as
specified in paragraph (g) of this proposed AD.
Interim Action
We consider this proposed AD interim action. If final action is
later identified, we might consider further rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 364 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average Number of
Work labor U.S.-
Action hours rate per Parts Cost per product registered Fleet cost
hour airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.................... 10 $80 $0 $800, per 364 $291,200, per
inspection cycle. inspection
cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 64286]]
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2008-1117; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-
106-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by December 15, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 727, 727C, 727-100, 727
-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from a report of cracking of the left- and
right-side web posts and shear ties of the kickload beam. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking of the left- and
right-side web posts and shear ties of the kickload beam, which,
when coupled with failures in the adjacent structure, could result
in structural failure of the vertical stabilizer, and loss of
control of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Inspections and Corrective Actions
(f) At the times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 727-55-0093, dated March
12, 2008 (``the service bulletin''), except as provided by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD: Do the inspections to detect
cracking of the left- and right-side web posts and shear ties of the
kickload beam, by doing all of the actions specified in Part 2 and
the applicable corrective actions specified in Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin, except as
provided by paragraph (i) of this AD. Do all applicable corrective
actions before further flight. Repeat the inspections thereafter at
the intervals specified in paragraph 1.E. of the service bulletin.
Clarification and Exception to the Specified Compliance Times
(g) To determine the compliance times for airplanes having
exactly 52,000 total flight hours or 39,000 total flight cycles, for
the purposes of this AD, these airplanes are grouped with airplanes
having ``less than'' 52,000 total flight hours or 39,000 total
flight cycles, as specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 727-55-0093, dated March
12, 2008.
(h) Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 727-55-0093,
dated March 12, 2008, specifies a compliance time after the date on
the service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
Exception to the Specified Corrective Actions
(i) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
this AD, and Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 727-55-0093,
dated March 12, 2008, specifies contacting Boeing for appropriate
action: Before further flight, repair the cracking or damage using a
method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be approved by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, as required by this paragraph, the Manager's
approval letter must specifically refer to this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(j)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, ATTN: Berhane Alazar,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-6577; fax
(425) 917-6590; has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 10, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-25758 Filed 10-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P