Notice of Availability of Final Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, 63460-63463 [E8-25420]
Download as PDF
63460
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices
Informed Commitment—Confirm
willingness and availability of appropriate
agency leadership and staff at all levels to
commit to principles of engagement, and
ensure commitment to participate in good
faith with open mindset to new perspectives.
Balanced, Voluntary Representation—
Ensure balanced inclusion of affected/
concerned interests; all parties should be
willing and able to participate and select
their own representatives.
Group Autonomy—Engage with all
participants in developing and governing
process; including choice of consensus-based
decision rules; seek assistance as needed
from impartial facilitator/mediator selected
by and accountable to all parties.
Informed Process—Seek agreement on how
to share, test and apply relevant information
(scientific, cultural, technical, etc.) among
participants; ensure relevant information is
accessible and understandable by all
participants.
Accountability—Participate in the process
directly, fully, and in good faith; be
accountable to all participants, as well as
agency representatives and the public.
Openness—Ensure all participants, and, as
appropriate, the public, are fully informed in
a timely manner of the purpose and
objectives of process; communicate agency
authorities, requirements and constraints;
uphold confidentiality rules and agreements
as required for particular proceedings.
Timeliness—Ensure timely decisions and
outcomes.
Implementation—Ensure that decisions are
implementable consistent with federal law
and policy. Parties also should commit to
identify roles and responsibilities necessary
to implement agreement; should agree in
advance on the consequences of a party being
unable to provide necessary resources or to
implement agreement; and should take steps
to obtain resources necessary to implement
any agreement.
Appendix B
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
List of References and Other Resources
Relating to ADR, ECR and Other
Collaborative Processes
References
1. Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of
1996, 5 U.S.C. 571 et seq.
2. The Technology Transfer
Commercialization Act of 2000, Public
Law No. 106–404
3. Joint Memorandum from Office of
Management and Budget and the Council
on Environmental Quality Joint
Memorandum on Environmental Conflict
Resolution, November 2005, (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/ceq/jointstatement.html)
4. The Negotiated Rulemaking Act, 5 U.S.C.
561 et seq.
5. Department of Justice Order 1160.1,
Promoting the Broader Appropriate Use
of Alternative Dispute Resolution
Techniques, https://www.usdoj.gov/crt/
adr/agorder.html
Other Resources
1. DOE’s Office of Conflict Prevention and
Resolution Web site, https://
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Oct 23, 2008
Jkt 217001
www.gc.doe.gov/disputeResolution.htm
2. U.S. Department of Justice’s Interagency
Alternative Dispute Resolution Working
Group, https://www.adr.gov/
3. The Institute for Environmental Conflict
Resolution, https://www.ecr.gov
[FR Doc. E8–25398 Filed 10–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Availability of Final Complex
Transformation Supplemental
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement
National Nuclear Security
Administration, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), a
separately-organized agency within the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE),
announces the availability of the
Complex Transformation Supplemental
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (Complex Transformation
SPEIS, DOE/EIS–0236–S4). The
Complex Transformation SPEIS
analyzes the potential environmental
impacts of reasonable alternatives to
continue transformation of the nuclear
weapons complex to be smaller, and
more responsive, efficient, and secure in
order to meet national security
requirements. It is a supplement to the
Stockpile Stewardship and Management
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (SSM PEIS, DOE/EIS–0236).
NNSA prepared the SPEIS in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations that implement the
procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
Parts 1500–1508), and DOE procedures
implementing NEPA (10 CFR Part 1021).
DATES: NNSA intends to issue one or
more Records of Decision (RODs) based
on the Complex Transformation SPEIS
thirty or more days after the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
publishes a notice of availability of the
Final Complex Transformation SPEIS in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Requests for additional
information on the Complex
Transformation SPEIS, including
requests for copies of the document,
should be directed to: Mr. Theodore A.
Wyka, Complex Transformation SPEIS
Document Manager, Office of
Transformation, NA–141, Department of
Energy/NNSA, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585,
toll free 1–800–832–0885 ext. 63519. A
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
request for a copy of the document may
also be sent by facsimile to 1–703–931–
9222, or by e-mail to complextrans
formation@nnsa.doe.gov.The Complex
Transformation SPEIS and additional
information regarding complex
transformation are available on the
Internet at https://www.Complex
TransformationSPEIS.com and https://
www.nnsa.doe.gov. The Complex
Transformation SPEIS and referenced
documents are available for review at
the DOE Reading Rooms and public
libraries listed at the end of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information on NNSA’s
proposal, please contact: Mr. Theodore
A. Wyka, NA–141, Complex
Transformation SPEIS Document
Manager, U.S. Department of Energy,
National Nuclear Security
Administration, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, or
telephone at 1–800–832–0885 ext.
63519. For general information about
the DOE NEPA process contact: Ms.
Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of
NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC–20),
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, telephone 202–
586–4600, or leave a message at 1–800–
472–2756. Additional information
regarding DOE NEPA activities and
access to many of DOE’s NEPA
documents are available on the Internet
through the DOE NEPA Web site at
https://www.gc.energy.gov/NEPA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: National
security policies require the U.S. DOE,
through the NNSA, to maintain the
United States’ nuclear weapons
stockpile,1 as well as core competencies
in nuclear weapons. Since completion
in 1996 of the Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement for
Stockpile Stewardship and Management
(SSM PEIS, DOE/EIS–0236) and
associated ROD (61 FR 68014; December
26, 1996), DOE has implemented these
policies through the Stockpile
Stewardship Program (SSP). The SSP
emphasizes development and
application of greatly improved
scientific and technical capabilities to
assess the safety, security, and
reliability of existing nuclear warheads
without the use of nuclear testing.
Throughout the 1990s, DOE also took
steps to consolidate the Complex from
12 sites to its current configuration of
three national laboratories (plus an
1 The nuclear weapons stockpile consists of
nuclear weapons that are both deployed to the
military services (‘‘operationally deployed’’) and
‘‘reserve weapons’’ that could be used to augment
the operationally deployed weapons or to provide
replacements for warheads that experience safety or
reliability problems.
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
associated flight test range), four
industrial plants, and a nuclear test site.
The Complex Transformation SPEIS
evaluates alternatives for continuing
transformation of the nuclear weapons
complex (Complex) into a smaller, more
efficient enterprise that can respond to
changing national security challenges.
These changes would build upon
decisions made in the 1990s following
the end of the Cold War and the
cessation of nuclear weapons testing.
The SPEIS contains NNSA’s
responses to comments submitted
during the public comment period,
which opened on January 11, 2008, and
closed on April 30, 2008, as well as
changes that were made to the Draft
SPEIS as a result of these comments.
The specific alternatives for
restructuring special nuclear materials
(SNM) 2 facilities are divided into two
broad categories: Programmatic, which
looks at ways to consolidate and
modernize manufacturing and SNM
activities; and project specific, which
look at ways to consolidate and
modernize specific research,
development, and testing activities. For
the programmatic alternatives, NNSA
evaluated:
• No Action Alternative: Under the
No Action Alternative, NNSA would
make no major changes to the SNM
missions now assigned to NNSA sites
and would continue to implement
actions for which NNSA has previously
announced its decision in a ROD. With
respect to SNM consolidation, ongoing
actions to transfer Category I/II 3 SNM
from Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory (LLNL) are included within
the No Action Alternative.
• Programmatic Alternative 1:
Distributed Centers of Excellence (DCE).
The DCE alternative would locate the
three major SNM functional capabilities
(plutonium operations, uranium
operations, and weapon assembly/
disassembly) involving Category I/II
quantities of SNM at two or three
separate Complex sites. This alternative
examines the potential creation of a
Consolidated Plutonium Center (CPC)
for research and development (R&D),
storage, processing, and manufacture of
plutonium parts (pits) for the nuclear
2 As defined in section 11 of the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, special nuclear material is: (1)
Plutonium, uranium enriched in the isotope 233 or
in the isotope 235; or (2) any material artificially
enriched by any of the foregoing and any other
material which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission determines to be special nuclear
material.
3 Special nuclear material is categorized into
Security Categories I, II, III, and IV based on the
type, attractiveness level, and quantity of material.
Categories I and II require the highest level of
security.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Oct 23, 2008
Jkt 217001
weapons stockpile. A CPC could consist
of new facilities, or modifications to
existing facilities at one of the following
sites: Los Alamos,4 Nevada Test Site
(NTS), Pantex, Savannah River Site
(SRS), or Y–12. This alternative assumes
that highly-enriched uranium and
uranium storage, and uranium
operations, would continue at Y–12,
either at a new Uranium Processing
Facility (UPF) or at upgraded, existing
facilities. It also assumes that the
weapons Assembly/Disassembly/High
Explosives (A/D/HE) mission would
remain at Pantex.
• Programmatic Alternative 2:
Consolidated Centers of Excellence
(CCE). Under this alternative, NNSA
would consolidate the three major SNM
functions (plutonium, uranium, and
weapon assembly/disassembly)
involving Category I/II quantities of
SNM at one or two sites. Two options
are assessed: A single site option
referred to as the consolidated nuclear
production center (CNPC) option, and a
two-site option, referred to as the
Consolidated Nuclear Center (CNC)
option. Under the CNPC option, a new
CNPC with facilities dedicated to
modernizing plutonium, uranium, and
weapon assembly/disassembly
operations could be established at Los
Alamos, NTS, Pantex, SRS, or Y–12.
The SPEIS analyzes the impacts of each
of these facilities separately and in
combination at all potential locations.
Under the CNC option, the plutonium
and uranium nuclear component
manufacturing missions could be
separate from the A/D/HE mission. The
A/D/HE functions could remain at
Pantex or move to the NTS, while the
plutonium and uranium missions could
be located at sites different than the A/
D/HE function.
• Programmatic Alternative 3:
Capability-Based Alternative. Under this
alternative, NNSA would maintain a
basic capability for manufacturing
components for all stockpile weapons,
as well as laboratory and experimental
capabilities to support the stockpile,
while reducing production facilities inplace to the extent that would allow
NNSA to produce a nominal level of
replacement components
(approximately 50 components per
year). Pit production capacity at LANL
would not be expanded beyond the
capability to produce 50 pits per year.
Within this alternative, NNSA also
considered a No Net Production/
4 In general, when referring to the Los Alamos
National Laboratory, the SPEIS refers to this site as
‘‘LANL.’’ The term ‘‘Los Alamos’’ is used to
describe this site as an alternative location for a
CPC or Consolidated Nuclear Production Center
(CNPC).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63461
Capability-Based Alternative, in which
NNSA would maintain capabilities to
continue surveillance of the weapons
stockpile, produce limited life
components, and continue
dismantlement. This alternative
involves a minimum production
(production of 10 sets of components or
assembly of 10 weapons per year),
within facilities with a larger
manufacturing capability.
For the project specific alternatives,
NNSA evaluated:
• High Explosives (HE) Research and
Development (R&D)
• Tritium R&D
• Flight Test Operations
• Hydrodynamic Testing
• Major Environmental Testing
• Weapons Support Functions at Sandia
National Laboratories (SNL),
California
Alternatives for each of these project
areas generally include: No action,
consolidation, and downsizing in place.
In the case of Flight Test Operations,
NNSA also considered additional
alternatives that would relocate Flight
Test Operations to either White Sands
Missile Range, or the Nevada Test Site.
Preferred Alternatives: In accordance
with CEQ regulations at 40 CFR
1502.14(e), NNSA identified the
following preferred alternatives in the
SPEIS:
Preferred Alternatives for Restructuring
SNM Facilities
• Plutonium manufacturing and R&D:
Los Alamos would provide a
consolidated plutonium research,
development, and manufacturing
capability within Technical Area–55
(TA–55), enabled by construction and
operation of the Chemistry and
Metallurgy Research ReplacementNuclear Facility (CMRR–NF). The
CMRR–NF is needed to replace the
existing Chemistry and Metallurgy
Research (CMR) Facility (a 50-year old
facility that has significant safety issues
that cannot be addressed in the existing
structure), to support movement of
plutonium R&D and Category I/II
quantities of SNM from LLNL, and
consolidate weapons-related plutonium
operations at Los Alamos. Until
completion of a new Nuclear Posture
Review in 2009 or later, the net
production at Los Alamos would be
limited to a maximum of 20 pits per
year. Other national security actinide
needs and missions would continue to
be supported at TA–55 on a priority
basis (e.g., emergency response, material
disposition, nuclear energy).
• Uranium manufacturing and R&D:
Y–12 would continue as the uranium
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
63462
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices
center producing components and
canned subassemblies, and conducting
surveillance and dismantlement. NNSA
has completed construction of the
HEUMF and will consolidate HEU
storage in that facility.5 NNSA would
build a Uranium Processing Facility
(UPF) at Y–12 in order to provide a
smaller and modern highly-enriched
uranium production capability to
replace existing 50-year old facilities.
The site-specific impacts and candidate
locations for a UPF will be analyzed in
a new SWEIS for Y–12 that NNSA is
currently preparing.
• Assembly/disassembly/high
explosives production and
manufacturing: Pantex would remain
the Assembly/Disassembly/High
Explosives production and
manufacturing center. NNSA would
consolidate non-destructive surveillance
operations at Pantex.
• Consolidation of Category I/II SNM:
NNSA would continue to transfer
Category I/II SNM from LLNL under the
No Action Alternative and phase out
Category I/II operations at LLNL
Superblock by the end of 2012. NNSA
would consolidate Category I/II SNM at
Pantex within Zone 12, and close Zone
4.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Preferred Alternatives for Restructuring
R&D and Testing Facilities
HE R&D: NNSA would reduce the
footprint of its HE production and R&D
related to nuclear weapons and reduce
the number of firing sites. Use of
energetic materials (greater than 1 kg)
for environmental testing conducted at
SNL, New Mexico (SNL/NM) would
continue (e.g., acceleration or sled
tracks, shock loading, or in explosive
tubes) and is not included in HE R&D.
NNSA would consolidate weapons HE
R&D and testing within the following
locations, without constraining transfer
and operation of weapons programs
firing sites to other NNSA, Department
of Defense (DoD), and national security
sponsors, as follows:
• Pantex would remain the HE
production (formulation, processing,
and testing) and machining center. All
HE production and machining to
develop nuclear explosive packages
would continue at Pantex. HE
experiments up to 22 kg HE would
remain at Pantex;
• NTS would remain the testing
center for large quantities of HE (greater
than 10 kg);
• LLNL would be the HE R&D center
for formulation, processing, and testing
5 The environmental impacts at HEUMF and its
alternatives are analyzed in the 2001 Y–12 SWEIS
(DOE/EIS–0309).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Oct 23, 2008
Jkt 217001
(processing capability to handle up to
15 kg and testing less than 10 kg) HE at
the High Explosives Applications
Facility (HEAF); formulation and
processing of HE would be conducted
either at a new HEAF Annex built
adjacent to HEAF, or at existing Site 300
facilities (but using less space than
currently used for these activities);
• SNL/NM would remain the HE R&D
center for non-nuclear explosive
package components (less than 1 kg of
HE) at the Explosive Components
Facility (ECF); and
• LANL would produce war reserve
main charge detonators, conduct HE
R&D experimentation and support
activities, and move towards contained
HE R&D experimentation.
• Each site would maintain one
weapons program open-burn and one
open-detonation area for safety and
treatment purposes.
Tritium R&D: NNSA would
consolidate tritium R&D at SRS. SRS
would remain the site for tritium supply
management and provide R&D support
to production operations and gas
transfer system development. Neutron
generator target loading at SNL/NM and
production of National Ignition Facility
targets at LLNL, which involve small
quantities of tritium, would continue
and would not be included in this
consolidation. NNSA would move bulk
quantities of tritium from LANL to SRS
by 2009; and remove tritium materials
above the 30 gram level from the
Weapons Engineering Tritium Facility
(WETF) at LANL by 2014.
NNSA flight test operations: NNSA
would reduce the footprint of Tonopah
Test Range, upgrade equipment with
mobile capability, and operate in
campaign mode. NNSA expects it would
not use Category I/II SNM in future
flight tests.
Major Hydrodynamic Testing: By the
end of fiscal year 2008, NNSA would
contain the hydrodynamic testing
(consisting of Integrated Weapons
Experiments and Focused Experiments)
at LLNL at the Contained Firing Facility
and at LANL at the Dual-Axis
Radiographic Hydrodynamic Test
(DARHT) facility. At LANL, firing site
operations for weapon programs
required by NNSA’s hydrodynamic test
program would be moved to contained
firing. In addition:
• Hydrotesting at LLNL Site 300
would be consolidated to a smaller
footprint by 2015.
• The goal is to minimize open-air
testing at LANL. Open-air hydrotests at
LANL’s DARHT, excluding SNM, would
only occur if needed to meet national
security requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• NNSA would allow open-air firing
at LANL TA–36 until adequate
radiographic capabilities and associated
supporting infrastructure are available
for open-air firing at NTS.
Major Environmental Test Facilities:
NNSA would consolidate major
environmental testing at SNL/NM and,
infrequently, conduct operations
requiring Category I/II SNM in security
campaign mode there. NNSA would
close LANL’s and LLNL’s major
environmental testing facilities by 2010
(except those in LLNL Building 334 and
the Building 834 Complex). NNSA
would move environmental testing of
nuclear explosive packages and other
functions currently performed in LLNL
Buildings 334 and 834 to Pantex by
2012.
Sandia National Laboratories,
California Weapons Support Functions:
NNSA would continue operations under
the No Action Alternative.
As to any other programmatic and
project-specific alternatives not
mentioned above, NNSA’s preferred
alternative at this time is to continue
with the No Action Alternatives.
NNSA will consider the
environmental impact analysis
presented in the Complex
Transformation SPEIS, along with other
information, in making decisions
regarding its continuing transformation
of the Complex. NNSA intends to issue
one or more Records of Decision 30 or
more days after EPA publishes a notice
of availability of the Final Complex
Transformation SPEIS in the Federal
Register. It is anticipated that several
Records of Decision may be issued
based on the Complex Transformation
SPEIS over the next several years.
NNSA will publish all Records of
Decision in the Federal Register. The
Complex Transformation SPEIS and
referenced documents are available for
review at the following DOE Reading
Rooms and public libraries:
Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, Public Reading Room,
Discovery Center, Building 6525,
Livermore, CA 94550, Phone: (925)
422–3272.
Livermore Public Library, 1188 South
Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA
94550–9315, Phone: (925) 937–5500.
Tracy Public Library, 20 East Eaton
Avenue, Tracy, CA 95376, Phone:
(209) 937–8221.
Southeastern Power Administration,
U.S. Department of Energy, Public
Reading Room, 1166 Athens Tech
Road, Elberton, GA 30635–6711,
Phone: (706) 213–3800.
East-Central Georgia Regional Library,
902 Greene Street, Augusta, GA
30901, Phone: (706) 821–2600.
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Notices
Central Library, 14 West 10th Street,
Kansas City, MO 64105, Phone: (816)
701–3400.
North-East Branch, 6000 Wilson Road,
Kansas City, MO 64123, Phone: (816)
701–3485.
Kansas City Site Office, Mid-Continent
Public Library, Blue Ridge Branch,
9253 Blue Ridge Boulevard, Kansas
City, MO 64138, Phone: (816) 761–
3382.
NNSA Nevada Site Office, U.S.
Department of Energy, Public Reading
Room, 755 East Flamingo Road; Room
103, Las Vegas, NV 89119, Phone:
(702) 784–5121.
Office of Repository Development,
Bechtel SAIC Company LLC, Reading
Room, Science Center, 4101 B
Meadows Lane, Las Vegas, NV 89107,
Phone: (702) 295–1312.
Las Vegas Library, 833 Las Vegas
Boulevard North, Las Vegas, NV
89101, Phone: (702) 507–3500.
Indian Springs Library, 715 Gretta Lane,
Indian Springs, NV 89018, Phone:
(702) 879–3845.
Beatty Community Library, 400 North
4th Street, Beatty, NV 89003, Phone:
(775) 553–2257.
Tonopah Public Library, 167 South
Central Street, Tonopah, NV 89049,
Phone: (775) 482–3374.
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Public
Reading Room, PO Box 1663, Mail
Stop M9991, Los Alamos, NM 87545,
Phone: (505) 667–0216.
National Nuclear Security
Administration Service Center, DOE
Reading Room, Government
Information Department, Zimmerman
Library, University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, NM 87131–1466,
Phone: (505) 277–7180.
Mesa Public Library, 2300 Central
Avenue, Los Alamos, NM 87544,
Phone: (505) 662–8250.
Santa Fe Main Library, 145 Washington
Avenue, Santa Fe, NM 87501, Phone:
(505) 955–6780.
Socorro Public Library, 401 Park Street,
Socorro, NM 87801, Phone: (505)
835–1114.
Savannah River Operations Office,
Gregg-Graniteville Library, University
of South Carolina-Aiken, 471
University Parkway, Aiken, SC 29801,
Phone: (803) 641–3320.
Aiken County Public Library, 314
Chesterfield Street South, Aiken, SC
29801, Phone: (803) 642–2020.
Barnwell County Public Library, 617
Hagood Avenue, Barnwell, SC 29812,
Phone: (803) 259–3612.
Oak Ridge Office, DOE Information
Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak
Ridge, TN 37830, Phone: (865) 241–
4780 or 1 (800) 328–6938, Option 6.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:48 Oct 23, 2008
Jkt 217001
Oak Ridge Public Library, Civic Center,
1401 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge,
TN 37830, Phone: (865) 425–3455.
Kingston Public Library, 1004 Bradford
Way, Kingston, TN 37763, Phone:
(865) 376–9905.
Central Library, 413 E 4th Avenue;
Amarillo, TX 79101, Phone: (806)
378–3054.
North Branch, 1500 NE 24th Avenue,
Amarillo, TX 79107, Phone: (806)
381–7931.
DOE Reading Room, Lynn Library/
Learning Center, Amarillo College,
Washington Street Campus, 2201
South Washington Street, Amarillo,
Texas, Phone: (806) 371–5400.
Carson County Library, 401 Main Street,
Panhandle, Texas 79068, Phone: (806)
537–3742.
U.S. Department of Energy, Freedom of
Information Act Reading Room, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., IE–190,
Washington, DC 20585–0001, Phone:
(202) 586–5955.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 21st day of
October 2008.
Thomas P. D’Agostino,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. E8–25420 Filed 10–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Supplement to the Environmental
Impact Statements for a Geologic
Repository for the Disposal of Spent
Nuclear Fuel and High-Level
Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain,
Nye County, NV
U.S. Department of Energy.
Notice of Intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE or the Department) is
announcing its intent to prepare a
Supplement to the ‘‘Final
Environmental Impact Statement for a
Geologic Repository for the Disposal of
Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level
Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain,
Nye County, Nevada’’ (DOE/EIS–0250F,
February 2002) (Yucca Mountain Final
EIS), and the ‘‘Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for a
Geologic Repository for the Disposal of
Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level
Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain,
Nye County, Nevada’’ (DOE/EIS–0250FS1, July 2008) (Repository SEIS). The
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) staff determined, pursuant to
Section 114(f)(4) of the Nuclear Waste
Policy Act of 1982, as amended
(NWPA), that it is practicable to adopt,
with further supplementation, DOE’s
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63463
environmental impact statements
prepared in connection with the
proposed repository at Yucca Mountain,
Nye County, Nevada. The NRC staff
concluded that the Yucca Mountain
Final EIS and Repository SEIS did not
address adequately all of the repositoryrelated impacts on groundwater, or from
surface discharges of groundwater, and
therefore requested that DOE prepare a
supplement to these environmental
impact statements. Based on a review of
the NRC staff evaluation, the
Department has decided to prepare the
requested supplement.
DATES: The Department invites
comments during a 30-day period,
which starts with publication of this
Notice of Intent and ends November 24,
2008. Comments received after this date
will be considered to the extent
practicable.
Requests for additional
information on the supplement or on
the repository program in general, or to
become a cooperating agency should be
directed to: Dr. Jane Summerson, EIS
Document Manager, Regulatory
Authority Office, Office of Civilian
Radioactive Waste Management, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1551 Hillshire
Drive, Las Vegas, NV 89134, Telephone
1–800–967–3477. Written comments
may be submitted to Dr. Jane
Summerson at this address, or by
facsimile to 1–888–767–0739, or via the
Internet at https://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/
contact/comments.shtml.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information regarding the DOE
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) process contact: Ms. Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20585, Telephone 202–586–4600, or
leave a message at 1–800–472–2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Background
The NWPA directs the Secretary of
Energy, if the Secretary decides to
recommend approval of the Yucca
Mountain site for development of a
repository, to submit a final
environmental impact statement with
any recommendation to the President.
The Department prepared the Yucca
Mountain Final EIS to fulfill that
requirement. The Yucca Mountain Final
EIS considered the potential
environmental impacts of a repository
design for surface and subsurface
facilities, and plans for the construction,
operation, monitoring, and eventual
closure of the repository.
E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM
24OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 207 (Friday, October 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63460-63463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25420]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Availability of Final Complex Transformation
Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a
separately-organized agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE),
announces the availability of the Complex Transformation Supplemental
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Complex Transformation
SPEIS, DOE/EIS-0236-S4). The Complex Transformation SPEIS analyzes the
potential environmental impacts of reasonable alternatives to continue
transformation of the nuclear weapons complex to be smaller, and more
responsive, efficient, and secure in order to meet national security
requirements. It is a supplement to the Stockpile Stewardship and
Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (SSM PEIS, DOE/
EIS-0236). NNSA prepared the SPEIS in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) regulations that implement the procedural provisions of NEPA (40
CFR Parts 1500-1508), and DOE procedures implementing NEPA (10 CFR Part
1021).
DATES: NNSA intends to issue one or more Records of Decision (RODs)
based on the Complex Transformation SPEIS thirty or more days after the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes a notice of
availability of the Final Complex Transformation SPEIS in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Requests for additional information on the Complex
Transformation SPEIS, including requests for copies of the document,
should be directed to: Mr. Theodore A. Wyka, Complex Transformation
SPEIS Document Manager, Office of Transformation, NA-141, Department of
Energy/NNSA, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, toll
free 1-800-832-0885 ext. 63519. A request for a copy of the document
may also be sent by facsimile to 1-703-931-9222, or by e-mail to
complextransformation@nnsa.doe.gov.The Complex Transformation SPEIS and
additional information regarding complex transformation are available
on the Internet at https://www.ComplexTransformationSPEIS.com and
https://www.nnsa.doe.gov. The Complex Transformation SPEIS and
referenced documents are available for review at the DOE Reading Rooms
and public libraries listed at the end of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information on NNSA's
proposal, please contact: Mr. Theodore A. Wyka, NA-141, Complex
Transformation SPEIS Document Manager, U.S. Department of Energy,
National Nuclear Security Administration, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585, or telephone at 1-800-832-0885 ext. 63519.
For general information about the DOE NEPA process contact: Ms. Carol
M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance (GC-20),
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC 20585, telephone 202-586-4600, or leave a message at 1-800-472-2756.
Additional information regarding DOE NEPA activities and access to many
of DOE's NEPA documents are available on the Internet through the DOE
NEPA Web site at https://www.gc.energy.gov/NEPA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: National security policies require the U.S.
DOE, through the NNSA, to maintain the United States' nuclear weapons
stockpile,\1\ as well as core competencies in nuclear weapons. Since
completion in 1996 of the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
for Stockpile Stewardship and Management (SSM PEIS, DOE/EIS-0236) and
associated ROD (61 FR 68014; December 26, 1996), DOE has implemented
these policies through the Stockpile Stewardship Program (SSP). The SSP
emphasizes development and application of greatly improved scientific
and technical capabilities to assess the safety, security, and
reliability of existing nuclear warheads without the use of nuclear
testing. Throughout the 1990s, DOE also took steps to consolidate the
Complex from 12 sites to its current configuration of three national
laboratories (plus an
[[Page 63461]]
associated flight test range), four industrial plants, and a nuclear
test site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The nuclear weapons stockpile consists of nuclear weapons
that are both deployed to the military services (``operationally
deployed'') and ``reserve weapons'' that could be used to augment
the operationally deployed weapons or to provide replacements for
warheads that experience safety or reliability problems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Complex Transformation SPEIS evaluates alternatives for
continuing transformation of the nuclear weapons complex (Complex) into
a smaller, more efficient enterprise that can respond to changing
national security challenges. These changes would build upon decisions
made in the 1990s following the end of the Cold War and the cessation
of nuclear weapons testing.
The SPEIS contains NNSA's responses to comments submitted during
the public comment period, which opened on January 11, 2008, and closed
on April 30, 2008, as well as changes that were made to the Draft SPEIS
as a result of these comments.
The specific alternatives for restructuring special nuclear
materials (SNM) \2\ facilities are divided into two broad categories:
Programmatic, which looks at ways to consolidate and modernize
manufacturing and SNM activities; and project specific, which look at
ways to consolidate and modernize specific research, development, and
testing activities. For the programmatic alternatives, NNSA evaluated:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ As defined in section 11 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
special nuclear material is: (1) Plutonium, uranium enriched in the
isotope 233 or in the isotope 235; or (2) any material artificially
enriched by any of the foregoing and any other material which the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission determines to be special nuclear
material.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
No Action Alternative: Under the No Action Alternative,
NNSA would make no major changes to the SNM missions now assigned to
NNSA sites and would continue to implement actions for which NNSA has
previously announced its decision in a ROD. With respect to SNM
consolidation, ongoing actions to transfer Category I/II \3\ SNM from
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) are included within the
No Action Alternative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Special nuclear material is categorized into Security
Categories I, II, III, and IV based on the type, attractiveness
level, and quantity of material. Categories I and II require the
highest level of security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programmatic Alternative 1: Distributed Centers of
Excellence (DCE). The DCE alternative would locate the three major SNM
functional capabilities (plutonium operations, uranium operations, and
weapon assembly/disassembly) involving Category I/II quantities of SNM
at two or three separate Complex sites. This alternative examines the
potential creation of a Consolidated Plutonium Center (CPC) for
research and development (R&D), storage, processing, and manufacture of
plutonium parts (pits) for the nuclear weapons stockpile. A CPC could
consist of new facilities, or modifications to existing facilities at
one of the following sites: Los Alamos,\4\ Nevada Test Site (NTS),
Pantex, Savannah River Site (SRS), or Y-12. This alternative assumes
that highly-enriched uranium and uranium storage, and uranium
operations, would continue at Y-12, either at a new Uranium Processing
Facility (UPF) or at upgraded, existing facilities. It also assumes
that the weapons Assembly/Disassembly/High Explosives (A/D/HE) mission
would remain at Pantex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ In general, when referring to the Los Alamos National
Laboratory, the SPEIS refers to this site as ``LANL.'' The term
``Los Alamos'' is used to describe this site as an alternative
location for a CPC or Consolidated Nuclear Production Center (CNPC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Programmatic Alternative 2: Consolidated Centers of
Excellence (CCE). Under this alternative, NNSA would consolidate the
three major SNM functions (plutonium, uranium, and weapon assembly/
disassembly) involving Category I/II quantities of SNM at one or two
sites. Two options are assessed: A single site option referred to as
the consolidated nuclear production center (CNPC) option, and a two-
site option, referred to as the Consolidated Nuclear Center (CNC)
option. Under the CNPC option, a new CNPC with facilities dedicated to
modernizing plutonium, uranium, and weapon assembly/disassembly
operations could be established at Los Alamos, NTS, Pantex, SRS, or Y-
12. The SPEIS analyzes the impacts of each of these facilities
separately and in combination at all potential locations. Under the CNC
option, the plutonium and uranium nuclear component manufacturing
missions could be separate from the A/D/HE mission. The A/D/HE
functions could remain at Pantex or move to the NTS, while the
plutonium and uranium missions could be located at sites different than
the A/D/HE function.
Programmatic Alternative 3: Capability-Based Alternative.
Under this alternative, NNSA would maintain a basic capability for
manufacturing components for all stockpile weapons, as well as
laboratory and experimental capabilities to support the stockpile,
while reducing production facilities in-place to the extent that would
allow NNSA to produce a nominal level of replacement components
(approximately 50 components per year). Pit production capacity at LANL
would not be expanded beyond the capability to produce 50 pits per
year. Within this alternative, NNSA also considered a No Net
Production/Capability-Based Alternative, in which NNSA would maintain
capabilities to continue surveillance of the weapons stockpile, produce
limited life components, and continue dismantlement. This alternative
involves a minimum production (production of 10 sets of components or
assembly of 10 weapons per year), within facilities with a larger
manufacturing capability.
For the project specific alternatives, NNSA evaluated:
High Explosives (HE) Research and Development (R&D)
Tritium R&D
Flight Test Operations
Hydrodynamic Testing
Major Environmental Testing
Weapons Support Functions at Sandia National Laboratories
(SNL), California
Alternatives for each of these project areas generally include: No
action, consolidation, and downsizing in place. In the case of Flight
Test Operations, NNSA also considered additional alternatives that
would relocate Flight Test Operations to either White Sands Missile
Range, or the Nevada Test Site.
Preferred Alternatives: In accordance with CEQ regulations at 40
CFR 1502.14(e), NNSA identified the following preferred alternatives in
the SPEIS:
Preferred Alternatives for Restructuring SNM Facilities
Plutonium manufacturing and R&D: Los Alamos would provide
a consolidated plutonium research, development, and manufacturing
capability within Technical Area-55 (TA-55), enabled by construction
and operation of the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement-
Nuclear Facility (CMRR-NF). The CMRR-NF is needed to replace the
existing Chemistry and Metallurgy Research (CMR) Facility (a 50-year
old facility that has significant safety issues that cannot be
addressed in the existing structure), to support movement of plutonium
R&D and Category I/II quantities of SNM from LLNL, and consolidate
weapons-related plutonium operations at Los Alamos. Until completion of
a new Nuclear Posture Review in 2009 or later, the net production at
Los Alamos would be limited to a maximum of 20 pits per year. Other
national security actinide needs and missions would continue to be
supported at TA-55 on a priority basis (e.g., emergency response,
material disposition, nuclear energy).
Uranium manufacturing and R&D: Y-12 would continue as the
uranium
[[Page 63462]]
center producing components and canned subassemblies, and conducting
surveillance and dismantlement. NNSA has completed construction of the
HEUMF and will consolidate HEU storage in that facility.\5\ NNSA would
build a Uranium Processing Facility (UPF) at Y-12 in order to provide a
smaller and modern highly-enriched uranium production capability to
replace existing 50-year old facilities. The site-specific impacts and
candidate locations for a UPF will be analyzed in a new SWEIS for Y-12
that NNSA is currently preparing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The environmental impacts at HEUMF and its alternatives are
analyzed in the 2001 Y-12 SWEIS (DOE/EIS-0309).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assembly/disassembly/high explosives production and
manufacturing: Pantex would remain the Assembly/Disassembly/High
Explosives production and manufacturing center. NNSA would consolidate
non-destructive surveillance operations at Pantex.
Consolidation of Category I/II SNM: NNSA would continue to
transfer Category I/II SNM from LLNL under the No Action Alternative
and phase out Category I/II operations at LLNL Superblock by the end of
2012. NNSA would consolidate Category I/II SNM at Pantex within Zone
12, and close Zone 4.
Preferred Alternatives for Restructuring R&D and Testing Facilities
HE R&D: NNSA would reduce the footprint of its HE production and
R&D related to nuclear weapons and reduce the number of firing sites.
Use of energetic materials (greater than 1 kg) for environmental
testing conducted at SNL, New Mexico (SNL/NM) would continue (e.g.,
acceleration or sled tracks, shock loading, or in explosive tubes) and
is not included in HE R&D. NNSA would consolidate weapons HE R&D and
testing within the following locations, without constraining transfer
and operation of weapons programs firing sites to other NNSA,
Department of Defense (DoD), and national security sponsors, as
follows:
Pantex would remain the HE production (formulation,
processing, and testing) and machining center. All HE production and
machining to develop nuclear explosive packages would continue at
Pantex. HE experiments up to 22 kg HE would remain at Pantex;
NTS would remain the testing center for large quantities
of HE (greater than 10 kg);
LLNL would be the HE R&D center for formulation,
processing, and testing (processing capability to handle up to 15 kg
and testing less than 10 kg) HE at the High Explosives Applications
Facility (HEAF); formulation and processing of HE would be conducted
either at a new HEAF Annex built adjacent to HEAF, or at existing Site
300 facilities (but using less space than currently used for these
activities);
SNL/NM would remain the HE R&D center for non-nuclear
explosive package components (less than 1 kg of HE) at the Explosive
Components Facility (ECF); and
LANL would produce war reserve main charge detonators,
conduct HE R&D experimentation and support activities, and move towards
contained HE R&D experimentation.
Each site would maintain one weapons program open-burn and
one open-detonation area for safety and treatment purposes.
Tritium R&D: NNSA would consolidate tritium R&D at SRS. SRS would
remain the site for tritium supply management and provide R&D support
to production operations and gas transfer system development. Neutron
generator target loading at SNL/NM and production of National Ignition
Facility targets at LLNL, which involve small quantities of tritium,
would continue and would not be included in this consolidation. NNSA
would move bulk quantities of tritium from LANL to SRS by 2009; and
remove tritium materials above the 30 gram level from the Weapons
Engineering Tritium Facility (WETF) at LANL by 2014.
NNSA flight test operations: NNSA would reduce the footprint of
Tonopah Test Range, upgrade equipment with mobile capability, and
operate in campaign mode. NNSA expects it would not use Category I/II
SNM in future flight tests.
Major Hydrodynamic Testing: By the end of fiscal year 2008, NNSA
would contain the hydrodynamic testing (consisting of Integrated
Weapons Experiments and Focused Experiments) at LLNL at the Contained
Firing Facility and at LANL at the Dual-Axis Radiographic Hydrodynamic
Test (DARHT) facility. At LANL, firing site operations for weapon
programs required by NNSA's hydrodynamic test program would be moved to
contained firing. In addition:
Hydrotesting at LLNL Site 300 would be consolidated to a
smaller footprint by 2015.
The goal is to minimize open-air testing at LANL. Open-air
hydrotests at LANL's DARHT, excluding SNM, would only occur if needed
to meet national security requirements.
NNSA would allow open-air firing at LANL TA-36 until
adequate radiographic capabilities and associated supporting
infrastructure are available for open-air firing at NTS.
Major Environmental Test Facilities: NNSA would consolidate major
environmental testing at SNL/NM and, infrequently, conduct operations
requiring Category I/II SNM in security campaign mode there. NNSA would
close LANL's and LLNL's major environmental testing facilities by 2010
(except those in LLNL Building 334 and the Building 834 Complex). NNSA
would move environmental testing of nuclear explosive packages and
other functions currently performed in LLNL Buildings 334 and 834 to
Pantex by 2012.
Sandia National Laboratories, California Weapons Support Functions:
NNSA would continue operations under the No Action Alternative.
As to any other programmatic and project-specific alternatives not
mentioned above, NNSA's preferred alternative at this time is to
continue with the No Action Alternatives.
NNSA will consider the environmental impact analysis presented in
the Complex Transformation SPEIS, along with other information, in
making decisions regarding its continuing transformation of the
Complex. NNSA intends to issue one or more Records of Decision 30 or
more days after EPA publishes a notice of availability of the Final
Complex Transformation SPEIS in the Federal Register. It is anticipated
that several Records of Decision may be issued based on the Complex
Transformation SPEIS over the next several years. NNSA will publish all
Records of Decision in the Federal Register. The Complex Transformation
SPEIS and referenced documents are available for review at the
following DOE Reading Rooms and public libraries:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Public Reading Room, Discovery
Center, Building 6525, Livermore, CA 94550, Phone: (925) 422-3272.
Livermore Public Library, 1188 South Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA
94550-9315, Phone: (925) 937-5500.
Tracy Public Library, 20 East Eaton Avenue, Tracy, CA 95376, Phone:
(209) 937-8221.
Southeastern Power Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Public
Reading Room, 1166 Athens Tech Road, Elberton, GA 30635-6711, Phone:
(706) 213-3800.
East-Central Georgia Regional Library, 902 Greene Street, Augusta, GA
30901, Phone: (706) 821-2600.
[[Page 63463]]
Central Library, 14 West 10th Street, Kansas City, MO 64105, Phone:
(816) 701-3400.
North-East Branch, 6000 Wilson Road, Kansas City, MO 64123, Phone:
(816) 701-3485.
Kansas City Site Office, Mid-Continent Public Library, Blue Ridge
Branch, 9253 Blue Ridge Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64138, Phone: (816)
761-3382.
NNSA Nevada Site Office, U.S. Department of Energy, Public Reading
Room, 755 East Flamingo Road; Room 103, Las Vegas, NV 89119, Phone:
(702) 784-5121.
Office of Repository Development, Bechtel SAIC Company LLC, Reading
Room, Science Center, 4101 B Meadows Lane, Las Vegas, NV 89107, Phone:
(702) 295-1312.
Las Vegas Library, 833 Las Vegas Boulevard North, Las Vegas, NV 89101,
Phone: (702) 507-3500.
Indian Springs Library, 715 Gretta Lane, Indian Springs, NV 89018,
Phone: (702) 879-3845.
Beatty Community Library, 400 North 4th Street, Beatty, NV 89003,
Phone: (775) 553-2257.
Tonopah Public Library, 167 South Central Street, Tonopah, NV 89049,
Phone: (775) 482-3374.
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Public Reading Room, PO Box 1663, Mail
Stop M9991, Los Alamos, NM 87545, Phone: (505) 667-0216.
National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center, DOE Reading
Room, Government Information Department, Zimmerman Library, University
of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-1466, Phone: (505) 277-7180.
Mesa Public Library, 2300 Central Avenue, Los Alamos, NM 87544, Phone:
(505) 662-8250.
Santa Fe Main Library, 145 Washington Avenue, Santa Fe, NM 87501,
Phone: (505) 955-6780.
Socorro Public Library, 401 Park Street, Socorro, NM 87801, Phone:
(505) 835-1114.
Savannah River Operations Office, Gregg-Graniteville Library,
University of South Carolina-Aiken, 471 University Parkway, Aiken, SC
29801, Phone: (803) 641-3320.
Aiken County Public Library, 314 Chesterfield Street South, Aiken, SC
29801, Phone: (803) 642-2020.
Barnwell County Public Library, 617 Hagood Avenue, Barnwell, SC 29812,
Phone: (803) 259-3612.
Oak Ridge Office, DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak
Ridge, TN 37830, Phone: (865) 241-4780 or 1 (800) 328-6938, Option 6.
Oak Ridge Public Library, Civic Center, 1401 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak
Ridge, TN 37830, Phone: (865) 425-3455.
Kingston Public Library, 1004 Bradford Way, Kingston, TN 37763, Phone:
(865) 376-9905.
Central Library, 413 E 4th Avenue; Amarillo, TX 79101, Phone: (806)
378-3054.
North Branch, 1500 NE 24th Avenue, Amarillo, TX 79107, Phone: (806)
381-7931.
DOE Reading Room, Lynn Library/Learning Center, Amarillo College,
Washington Street Campus, 2201 South Washington Street, Amarillo,
Texas, Phone: (806) 371-5400.
Carson County Library, 401 Main Street, Panhandle, Texas 79068, Phone:
(806) 537-3742.
U.S. Department of Energy, Freedom of Information Act Reading Room,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW., IE-190, Washington, DC 20585-0001,
Phone: (202) 586-5955.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 21st day of October 2008.
Thomas P. D'Agostino,
Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.
[FR Doc. E8-25420 Filed 10-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P