Airworthiness Directives; Maryland Air Industries, Inc., Model Fairchild F-27 and FH-227 Series Airplanes, 63352-63353 [E8-25304]
Download as PDF
63352
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
applicable, in Appendix D, ‘‘Fuel System
Limitations,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness
Requirements,’’ of Bombardier CL–600–2B19
Maintenance Requirements Manual CSP–053,
Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007 (‘‘the MRM’’),
and thereafter repeat the inspection at the
applicable interval specified in the MRM,
except as provided by paragraphs (g)(2) and
(h)(1) of this AD.
(i) For airplanes not identified in paragraph
(f)(2)(i) of this AD, the initial compliance
time for Task 28–11–00–603 is before the
accumulation of 20,000 total flight hours, or
within 5,000 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(ii) For airplanes not identified in
paragraph (f)(4) of this AD, the initial
compliance time for Task 29–33–01–602 is
before the accumulation of 30,000 total flight
hours, or within 2,500 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
(iii) For airplanes not identified in
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this AD, the initial
compliance time for Tasks 28–11–00–601,
28–11–00–602, and 28–11–00–604, is within
20,000 flight hours after accomplishing the
applicable modsum or service bulletin
specified in the MRM for the task, or within
5,000 flight hours after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later.
(2) After accomplishing the actions
specified in paragraphs (g)(1) of this AD, no
alternative inspections/limitation tasks or
inspection/limitation task intervals may be
used unless the inspection/limitation task or
inspection/limitation task interval is
approved as an AMOC in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (h)(1)
of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Rocco
Viselli, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and
Propulsion Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7331; fax
(516) 794–5531. Before using any approved
AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards
District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your
local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Oct 23, 2008
Jkt 217001
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2007–29, dated November 22,
2007, and Appendix D, ‘‘Fuel System
Limitations,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness
Requirements,’’ of Bombardier CL–600–2B19
Maintenance Requirements Manual CSP–053,
Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007; for related
information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Appendix D, ‘‘Fuel
System Limitations,’’ of Part 2,
‘‘Airworthiness Requirements,’’ of
Bombardier CL–600–2B19 Maintenance
Requirements Manual CSP–053, Revision 7,
dated May 10, 2007, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
previously approved the incorporation by
reference of Appendix D, ‘‘Fuel System
Limitations,’’ of Part 2, ‘‘Airworthiness
Requirements,’’ of Bombardier CL–600–2B19
Maintenance Requirements Manual CSP–053,
Revision 7, dated May 10, 2007, on April 16,
2008 (73 FR 13100, March 12, 2008).
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair,
Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station
Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9,
Canada.
(3) You may review copies at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
(202) 741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
9, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–25299 Filed 10–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0734; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–004–AD; Amendment
39–15697; AD 2008–22–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Maryland Air
Industries, Inc., Model Fairchild F–27
and FH–227 Series Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Maryland Air Industries, Inc., Model
Fairchild F–27 and FH–227 Series
Airplanes. This AD requires operators to
modify their airplanes and revise their
inspection or maintenance programs to
incorporate instructions for
maintenance and inspection of the fuel
tank systems, as appropriate, by
December 16, 2008, using information
developed in accordance with Special
Federal Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR
88). This AD results from fuel system
safety reviews done on similar airplane
models in accordance with SFAR 88.
These safety reviews identified potential
unsafe conditions on Model Fairchild
F–27 and FH–227 series airplanes for
which the type certificate holder,
Maryland Air Industries, Inc., has not
conducted SFAR 88 safety reviews, has
not provided corrective actions, and
does not plan to do so. We are issuing
this AD to reduce the potential of
ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable
fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the
airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective November
28, 2008.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Delisio, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE–
171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone (516) 228–7321; fax
(516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that would apply to all
Maryland Air Industries, Inc., Model
Fairchild F–27 and FH–227 series
airplanes. That NPRM was published in
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 207 / Friday, October 24, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
the Federal Register on July 21, 2008
(73 FR 42282). That NPRM proposed to
require operators to modify their
airplanes and revise their inspection or
maintenance programs to incorporate
instructions for maintenance and
inspection of the fuel tank systems, as
appropriate, by December 16, 2008,
using information developed in
accordance with Special Federal
Aviation Regulation 88.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 29
airplanes of U.S. registry. We recognize
that this AD might impose certain costs.
However, we cannot calculate those
costs because we cannot anticipate the
complexity or content of the plans that
operators will submit to the FAA.
However, continued operational safety
necessitates the imposition of these
costs because of the severity of the
unsafe condition.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
‘‘Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:58 Oct 23, 2008
Jkt 217001
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory
evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2008–22–02 Maryland Air Industries, Inc.:
Amendment 39–15697. Docket No.
FAA–2008–0734; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–004–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective November 28, 2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Model Fairchild
F–27, F–27A, F–27B, F–27F, F–27G, F–27J,
F–27M, FH–227, FH–227B, FH–227C, FH–
227D, and FH–227E series airplanes,
certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from fuel system safety
reviews done on similar airplane models in
accordance with Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (SFAR 88). These safety
reviews identified potential unsafe
conditions on Model Fairchild F–27 and FH–
227 series airplanes for which the type
certificate holder, Maryland Air Industries,
Inc., has not conducted SFAR 88 safety
reviews, has not provided corrective actions,
and does not plan to do so. We are issuing
this AD to reduce the potential of ignition
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
63353
sources inside fuel tanks, which, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors,
could result in fuel tank explosions and
consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
Report
(f) Within 45 days after the effective date
of this AD, submit a report to the Manager,
New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA.
The report must include the information
listed in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this
AD. Under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements contained in this AD, and
assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.
(1) The airplane registration and
operational status.
(2) A plan for how the airplane operator
plans to comply with paragraph (g) of this
AD.
SFAR 88 Design Modifications and
Inspection or Maintenance Program Changes
(g) Before December 16, 2008, modify the
airplane and revise the inspection or
maintenance program to incorporate
instructions for maintenance and inspection
of the fuel tank system, using information
developed in accordance with the applicable
provisions SFAR 88, Amendment 21–78, and
subsequent Amendments 21–82 and 21–83,
which are included in a regulation titled
‘‘Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System
Design Review, Flammability Reduction, and
Maintenance and Inspection Requirements’’
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001).
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, ATTN: James
Delisio, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and
Propulsion Branch, ANE–171, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone (516) 228–7321; fax (516)
794–5531; has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector
(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District
Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) None.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
9, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8–25304 Filed 10–23–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\24OCR1.SGM
24OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 207 (Friday, October 24, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63352-63353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25304]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0734; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-004-AD;
Amendment 39-15697; AD 2008-22-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Maryland Air Industries, Inc., Model
Fairchild F-27 and FH-227 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Maryland Air Industries, Inc., Model Fairchild F-27 and FH-227 Series
Airplanes. This AD requires operators to modify their airplanes and
revise their inspection or maintenance programs to incorporate
instructions for maintenance and inspection of the fuel tank systems,
as appropriate, by December 16, 2008, using information developed in
accordance with Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR 88). This
AD results from fuel system safety reviews done on similar airplane
models in accordance with SFAR 88. These safety reviews identified
potential unsafe conditions on Model Fairchild F-27 and FH-227 series
airplanes for which the type certificate holder, Maryland Air
Industries, Inc., has not conducted SFAR 88 safety reviews, has not
provided corrective actions, and does not plan to do so. We are issuing
this AD to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel
tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
DATES: This AD is effective November 28, 2008.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Delisio, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7321; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
all Maryland Air Industries, Inc., Model Fairchild F-27 and FH-227
series airplanes. That NPRM was published in
[[Page 63353]]
the Federal Register on July 21, 2008 (73 FR 42282). That NPRM proposed
to require operators to modify their airplanes and revise their
inspection or maintenance programs to incorporate instructions for
maintenance and inspection of the fuel tank systems, as appropriate, by
December 16, 2008, using information developed in accordance with
Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 29 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
recognize that this AD might impose certain costs. However, we cannot
calculate those costs because we cannot anticipate the complexity or
content of the plans that operators will submit to the FAA. However,
continued operational safety necessitates the imposition of these costs
because of the severity of the unsafe condition.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: ``Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2008-22-02 Maryland Air Industries, Inc.: Amendment 39-15697. Docket
No. FAA-2008-0734; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-004-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective November 28,
2008.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all Model Fairchild F-27, F-27A, F-27B,
F-27F, F-27G, F-27J, F-27M, FH-227, FH-227B, FH-227C, FH-227D, and
FH-227E series airplanes, certificated in any category.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from fuel system safety reviews done on
similar airplane models in accordance with Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (SFAR 88). These safety reviews identified
potential unsafe conditions on Model Fairchild F-27 and FH-227
series airplanes for which the type certificate holder, Maryland Air
Industries, Inc., has not conducted SFAR 88 safety reviews, has not
provided corrective actions, and does not plan to do so. We are
issuing this AD to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside
fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
Compliance
(e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
Report
(f) Within 45 days after the effective date of this AD, submit a
report to the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA.
The report must include the information listed in paragraphs (f)(1)
and (f)(2) of this AD. Under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements
contained in this AD, and assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
(1) The airplane registration and operational status.
(2) A plan for how the airplane operator plans to comply with
paragraph (g) of this AD.
SFAR 88 Design Modifications and Inspection or Maintenance Program
Changes
(g) Before December 16, 2008, modify the airplane and revise the
inspection or maintenance program to incorporate instructions for
maintenance and inspection of the fuel tank system, using
information developed in accordance with the applicable provisions
SFAR 88, Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83,
which are included in a regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel
Tank System Design Review, Flammability Reduction, and Maintenance
and Inspection Requirements'' (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001).
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(h)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
ATTN: James Delisio, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion
Branch, ANE-171, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone (516) 228-7321; fax (516) 794-5531; has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) None.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 9, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-25304 Filed 10-23-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P