Substances Prohibited From Use in Animal Food or Feed; Correction, 63072-63073 [E8-25346]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
63072
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 206 / Thursday, October 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
This rule describes procedures
governing State administration of the
CWC arrangement under the FederalState UC program, which does not
extend to small governmental
jurisdictions. Therefore, the Department
certifies that this final rule will not have
a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities and, as a result,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
In addition, the Department certifies
that this rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of
1996 (SBREFA). Under section 804 of
SBREFA, a major rule is one that is an
‘‘economically significant regulatory
action’’ within the meaning of Executive
Order 12866. Because this final rule is
not an economically significant rule
under Executive Order 12866, the
Department certifies that it also is not a
major rule under SBREFA.
Executive Order 13045—Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045 concerns the
protection of children from
environmental health risks and safety
risks. This NPRM addresses UC, a
program for unemployed workers, and
has no impact on safety or health risks
to children.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
14:57 Oct 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
Executive Order 12630—Government
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
The final rule does not impose
limitations on private property use as
described under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and the
Interference with Constitutionality
Protected Property Rights. It does not
propose or implement licensing,
permitting or other condition
requirements on the use thereof, nor
require dedications or exactions from
owners of private property.
Accordingly, we have determined this
rule does not have takings implications.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, and
will not unduly burden the Federal
court system. The regulation has been
written so as to minimize litigation and
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, and has been reviewed
carefully to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguities.
that State using combined wages and
employment.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 616.7
[Amended]
4. Add new paragraph (f) to § 616.7 of
20 CFR to read as follows:
■
§ 616.7
Claim.
Election to file a Combined-Wage
*
*
*
*
*
(f) If a State denies a Combined-Wage
Claim, it must inform the claimant of
the option to file in another State in
which the claimant has wages and
employment during that State’s base
period(s).
§ 616.8
[Amended]
5. In § 616.8(a) remove the words ‘‘, if
any’’ and the words ‘‘, even if the
Combined-Wage Claimant has no
earnings in covered employment in that
State’’.
*
*
*
*
*
■
Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of
October 2008.
Brent R. Orrell,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Employment
and Training.
[FR Doc. E8–25097 Filed 10–22–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
Plain Language
The Department drafted this rule in
plain language.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 616
Executive Order 13175 addresses the
unique relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribal
governments. The order requires Federal
agencies to take certain actions when
regulations have ‘‘tribal implications.’’
Required actions include consulting
with tribal governments prior to
promulgating a regulation with tribal
implications and preparing a tribal
impact statement. The order defines
regulations as having ‘‘tribal
implications’’ when they have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The Department has reviewed this
NPRM and concludes that it does not
have tribal implications. This regulation
does not affect the relationship between
the Federal Government and the tribes,
nor does it affect the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and tribal
governments. Accordingly, we conclude
that this rule does not have tribal
VerDate Aug<31>2005
implications for the purposes of
Executive Order 13175.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Unemployment compensation.
■ For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the Department amends 20 CFR part 616
as set forth below:
Food and Drug Administration
PART 616—INTERSTATE
ARRANGEMENT FOR COMBINING
EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES
RIN 0910–AF46
1. The authority citation for 20 CFR
part 616 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 3304(a)(9)(B);
Secretary’s Order No. 3–2007, Apr. 3, 2007
(72 FR 15907).
§ 616.5
■
[Removed]
2. Remove § 616.5.
§ 616.6
[Amended]
3. Revise paragraph (e) of § 616.6 to
read as follows:
■
§ 616.6
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Paying State. A single State against
which the claimant files a CombinedWage Claim, if the claimant has wages
and employment in that State’s base
period(s) and the claimant qualifies for
unemployment benefits under the
unemployment compensation law of
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21 CFR Part 589
[Docket No. FDA–2002–N–0031] (formerly
Docket No. 2002N–0273)
Substances Prohibited From Use in
Animal Food or Feed; Correction
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is correcting a
final rule that appeared in the Federal
Register of April 25, 2008 (73 FR
22720). The document amended the
agency’s regulations to prohibit the use
of certain cattle origin materials in the
food or feed of all animals to further
strengthen existing safeguards against
bovine spongiform encephalopathy
(BSE). The document was inadvertently
published with incorrect dollar amounts
in two separate areas: The summary of
economic impacts and the paperwork
burden table. This document corrects
those errors.
DATES: Effective on April 27, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 206 / Thursday, October 23, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
Burt
Pritchett, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–222), Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–453–6860, email: burt.pritchett@fda.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
In the
Federal Register of April 25, 2008,
incorrect dollar amounts were
published in the document with respect
to: (1) The summary of economic
impacts and (2) the paperwork burden
table. Regarding the economic impact of
the rule, a dollar figure of $58 million
was cited as the estimated loss in
annual surplus caused by import
restrictions imposed on U.S. products
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
by other countries; the correct figure is
approximately $105 million. Regarding
the paperwork burden table (Table 9),
the estimated total operation and
maintenance costs for annual
recordkeeping was incorrectly cited as
$157,080. The estimated cost per
renderer should be $354.20, so the
estimated total operation and
maintenance costs for annual
recordkeeping is actually $160,275.
Therefore, in FR Doc. 08–1180,
appearing on page 22720 in the Federal
Register of Friday, April 25, 2008, the
following corrections are made to the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. On page 22737, in the first column,
in the last sentence preceding the first
63073
full paragraph, ‘‘Although we are unable
to quantify the effects of this final rule
on removing restrictions to foreign
markets, the benefits are potentially
large because the economy as a whole
loses an annual surplus equal to about
$58 million from the remaining
restrictions.’’ is corrected to read:
‘‘Although we are unable to quantify the
effects of this final rule on removing
restrictions to foreign markets, the benefits
are potentially large because the economy as
a whole loses an annual surplus equal to
about $105 million from the remaining
restrictions.’’
2. On page 22753, table 9 is corrected
to read:
TABLE 9.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN
21 CFR Section
No. of
Recordkeepers
589.2001(c)(2)(vi) and
(c)(3)(i)
Annual Frequency
per Recordkeeper
Total Annual
Records
Hours per
Recordkeeper
Total Hours
589.2001(c)(3)(i)(A)
175
1
175
20
3,500
$61,985
50
1
50
20
1,000
$17,710
175
1
175
26
4,550
$80,580
9,050
589.2001(c)(2)(ii)
$160,275
Total
3. On page 22753, in the third
column, following table 9, the second
complete sentence ‘‘Therefore, FDA
estimates that the cost per renderer for
compliance with the new requirement
for establishing and maintaining written
procedures will be $340 per renderer,
hence the new figure of $17,000 as
shown in Table 9 of this document.’’ is
corrected to read:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9321]
RIN 1545–BE79
Application of Section 409A to
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Plans; Correction
Dated: October 16, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E8–25346 Filed 10–22–08; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: This document contains
corrections to a correcting amendment
to final regulations (TD 9321) that was
published in the Federal Register on
October 7, 2008 (73 FR 58438). The final
regulations relate to section 409A and
nonqualified deferred compensation
plans.
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Correction.
This correction is effective
October 23, 2008.
Applicability date: April 17, 2007.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
DATES:
Guy
R. Traynor, (202) 622–3693 (not a tollfree number).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
14:57 Oct 22, 2008
Jkt 217001
Background
The final regulations that are subject
to this document are under section
409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Need for Correction
‘‘Therefore, FDA estimates that the cost per
renderer for compliance with the new
requirement for establishing and maintaining
written procedures will be $354.20 per
renderer (adjusted for inflation since the
October 2005 proposed rule), hence the new
figure of $17,710 as shown in Table 9 of this
document.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Operation and
Maintenance
Costs
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
As published, the correcting
amendment of September 24, 2008 (73
FR 54945) to final regulations (TD 9321)
contains errors that may prove to be
misleading and are in need of
clarification.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the publication of the
correcting amendment to final
regulations (TD 9321), which were the
subject of FR Doc. E8–23652, is
corrected as follows:
1. On page 58438, column 2, in the
first sentence of the ‘‘Summary’’ section
of the preamble the language ‘‘This
document contains corrections to final
regulations (TD 9321) which were
published in the Federal Register on
April 17, 2007 (72 FR 19323), corrected
July 31, 2007 (72 FR 41620) and
September 24, 2007 (72 FR 54945).’’, is
corrected to read ‘‘This document
contains corrections to final regulations
(TD 9321) which were published in the
Federal Register on April 17, 2007 (72
FR 19323), corrected July 31, 2007 (72
FR 41620), and September 24, 2008 (73
FR 54945).
E:\FR\FM\23OCR1.SGM
23OCR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 206 (Thursday, October 23, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63072-63073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25346]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 589
[Docket No. FDA-2002-N-0031] (formerly Docket No. 2002N-0273)
RIN 0910-AF46
Substances Prohibited From Use in Animal Food or Feed; Correction
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of April 25, 2008 (73 FR
22720). The document amended the agency's regulations to prohibit the
use of certain cattle origin materials in the food or feed of all
animals to further strengthen existing safeguards against bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The document was inadvertently
published with incorrect dollar amounts in two separate areas: The
summary of economic impacts and the paperwork burden table. This
document corrects those errors.
DATES: Effective on April 27, 2009.
[[Page 63073]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Burt Pritchett, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-222), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-453-6860, e-mail: burt.pritchett@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of April 25, 2008,
incorrect dollar amounts were published in the document with respect
to: (1) The summary of economic impacts and (2) the paperwork burden
table. Regarding the economic impact of the rule, a dollar figure of
$58 million was cited as the estimated loss in annual surplus caused by
import restrictions imposed on U.S. products by other countries; the
correct figure is approximately $105 million. Regarding the paperwork
burden table (Table 9), the estimated total operation and maintenance
costs for annual recordkeeping was incorrectly cited as $157,080. The
estimated cost per renderer should be $354.20, so the estimated total
operation and maintenance costs for annual recordkeeping is actually
$160,275.
Therefore, in FR Doc. 08-1180, appearing on page 22720 in the
Federal Register of Friday, April 25, 2008, the following corrections
are made to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. On page 22737, in the first column, in the last sentence
preceding the first full paragraph, ``Although we are unable to
quantify the effects of this final rule on removing restrictions to
foreign markets, the benefits are potentially large because the economy
as a whole loses an annual surplus equal to about $58 million from the
remaining restrictions.'' is corrected to read:
``Although we are unable to quantify the effects of this final
rule on removing restrictions to foreign markets, the benefits are
potentially large because the economy as a whole loses an annual
surplus equal to about $105 million from the remaining
restrictions.''
2. On page 22753, table 9 is corrected to read:
Table 9.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operation and
21 CFR Section No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per Total Hours Maintenance
Recordkeepers per Recordkeeper Records Recordkeeper Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
589.2001(c)(2)(vi) and (c)(3)(i) 175 1 175 20 3,500 $61,985
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
589.2001(c)(2)(ii) 50 1 50 20 1,000 $17,710
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
589.2001(c)(3)(i)(A) 175 1 175 26 4,550 $80,580
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 9,050 $160,275
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. On page 22753, in the third column, following table 9, the
second complete sentence ``Therefore, FDA estimates that the cost per
renderer for compliance with the new requirement for establishing and
maintaining written procedures will be $340 per renderer, hence the new
figure of $17,000 as shown in Table 9 of this document.'' is corrected
to read:
``Therefore, FDA estimates that the cost per renderer for
compliance with the new requirement for establishing and maintaining
written procedures will be $354.20 per renderer (adjusted for
inflation since the October 2005 proposed rule), hence the new
figure of $17,710 as shown in Table 9 of this document.''
Dated: October 16, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E8-25346 Filed 10-22-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
