Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for Review to the Office of Management and Budget, 62993-62994 [E8-25191]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 22, 2008 / Notices its Form 395-B to determine what changes were needed to comply with the new OMB standards, and whether it could conform Form 395–B to those standards consistent with Section 334 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘Act’’). 47 U.S.C. 334; see 2004 Order at 9978. With the EEOC’s release of the EEO– 1 incorporating revised racial and employment categories, the FCC’s Media Bureau sought public comment (‘‘Media Bureau Seeks Comment on Possible Changes to FCC Forms 395–A and 395–B,’’ Public Notice DA 08–752, released April 11, 2008; 73 FR 21346, April 21, 2008) (‘‘Public Notice’’) on whether to incorporate the EEOC’s revised categories and whether such changes would be consistent with Section 334 of the Act. The public comment period ended on June 6, 2008, and the Commission completed its review of all the comments and reply comments. The Commission did not receive any comments opposing the incorporation of the EEOC’s revised categories in the FCC’s annual employment reports. The Commission concluded that the proposed changes to FCC Form 395–B are consistent with Section 334 of the Act, which allows the FCC to make nonsubstantive technical or clerical revisions to annual employment reports in order to reflect changes in, inter alia, terminology. Because these changes do not subtract any information requested on the form, but rather seek more detail on race identification and official/ manager occupations, with minor changes in terminology, we concluded that they are consistent with Section 334. 47 U.S.C. 334. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–25189 Filed 10–21–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for Review to the Office of Management and Budget sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES October 17, 2008. SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection(s), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:50 Oct 21, 2008 Jkt 217001 An agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be submitted on or before November 21, 2008. If you anticipate that you will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC contact listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of Management and Budget, (202) 395– 5887, or via fax at 202–395–5167 or via internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Judith-B. Herman@fcc.gov, Federal Communications Commission, or an email to PRA@fcc.gov. To view a copy of this information collection request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web page https://reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the Web page called ‘‘Currently Under Review’’, (3) click on the downwardpointing arrow in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the ‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) select ‘‘Federal Communications Commission’’ from the list of agencies presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, and (6) when the list of FCC ICRs currently under review appears, look for the title of this ICR (or its OMB Control Number, if there is one) and then click on the ICR Reference Number to view detailed information about this ICR. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies of the information collection(s), contact Judith B. Herman at 202–418–0214 or via the Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB Control Number: 3060–0511. PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62993 Title: ARMIS Access Report. Report No.: FCC Report 43–04. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit. Number of Respondents: 76 respondents; 76 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 153 hours. Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement. Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 161, 219(b) and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Total Annual Burden: 11,628 hours. Total Annual Cost: N/A. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Ordinarily, questions of a sensitive nature are not involved in the ARMIS 43–04 Access Report. The Commission contends that areas in which detailed information is required are fully subject to regulation and the issue of data being regarded as sensitive will arise on special circumstances only. In such circumstances, the Commission instructs the respondent on the appropriate procedures to follow to safeguard sensitive data. Respondents may request confidential treatment of their documents under 47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission’s rules. Needs and Uses: The Federal Communications Commission is submitting this information collection (IC) to the OMB as an extension during this comment period to obtain the full three-year clearance from them. The Commission is reporting a ¥918 burden hour reduction (adjustment). This adjustment is due to fewer respondents (from 82 to 76 from the last time this information collection was submitted to the OMB). Therefore, the total annual burden hours are now estimated at 11,628 hours. The Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS), Report 43–04, Access Report provides jurisdictional separations and access charge data by Part 36 category of the Commission’s rules and regulations. The ARMIS Report 43–04 monitors revenue requirements, joint cost allocations, jurisdictional separations and access charges. Note: The Commission in its Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC Docket Nos. 07–21 and 05–342, 23 FCC Rcd 7302, released April 24, 2008, granted AT&T’s petition for forbearance, finding conditionally that AT&T, as a price cap carrier generally not subject to rate-of-return regulation, has demonstrated that forbearance from enforcing the Cost Assignment Rules satisfies the E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1 62994 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 22, 2008 / Notices sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES standard for forbearance under section 10 of the Act. Specially, the Commission concluded that there is no current need to apply the Cost Assignment Rules to AT&T. In addition, the Commission stated that LECs similarly situated to AT&T are free to seek comparable forbearance relief. Among other things, AT&T asked for forbearance from four of the Commission’s reporting requirements, including the Access Report (ARMIS 43–04.) As a condition of this forbearance, the Commission required AT&T to file a compliance plan, which must include, among other things, a description of its imputation methodology. AT&T must demonstrate that its access charge imputation methodologies remain consistent with section 272(e)(3) of the Communications rules and the Section 272 Sunset Order. In particular, AT&T’s compliance plan must describe how it will account for imputed tariff rates given the grant of the requested forbearance from section 32.5280(b) and (c) of the Commission’s rules. The Commission required that AT&T describe in detail how it will continue to fulfill its statutory and regulatory obligations, including section 254(k), and the conditions of this Order. The relief granted in this Order will not become effective unless and until AT&T’s plan is approved. The compliance plan must also include AT&T’s first annual certification that it will comply with its obligations under section 254(k) in the absence of the Cost Assignment Rules and will provide any requested cost accounting information necessary to prove such compliance. Also, the Commission required AT&T to include a proposal for how it will maintain its accounting procedures and data in a manner that will allow it to provide useable information on a timely basis if requested by the Commission to comply with any of the conditions of this relief and its commitment to the Commission. Finally, the plan must include an explanation of the transition process that AT&T will undertake, including an expected schedule, to discontinue compliance with Cost Assignment Rules and replace them with the procedures outlined in its compliance plan upon approval of the plan. The Commission delegated to the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) to prescribe the administrative requirements of the filing and to approve the plan when the Bureau is satisfied that AT&T will implement a method of preserving the integrity of its accounting system in the absence of the Cost Assignment Rules. Upon approval, the Bureau will release a public notice notifying the public of approval of the plan. In the Commission’s Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking WC Docket No. 08–190, et al., FCC 08–203, released September 6, 2008, it noted that in this proceeding parties have raised the issue of the overlap between the ARMIS requirements at issue in this proceeding and certain cost assignment relief previously granted to AT&T. Because the Commission found that the reasoning of the AT&T Cost Assignment VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:50 Oct 21, 2008 Jkt 217001 Forbearance Order applies to Verizon and Qwest, it took the opportunity, on its own motion, to extend to them the conditional forbearance granted in the AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order, subject to approval of their compliance plan. The Commission uses an indexed revenue threshold to determine which carriers are required to file the ARMIS reports. The current revenue threshold between Class A carriers and Class B carriers is $138 million and the revenue threshold between larger Class A carriers and mid-sized carriers is $8.181 billion. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–25191 Filed 10–21–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Notice of Agreements Filed The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of agreements are available through the Commission’s Web site (https://www.fmc.gov) or contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. Agreement No.: 010099–048. Title: International Council of Containership Operators. Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; ANL Container Line Pty Ltd.; American President Lines, Ltd.; APL Co. Pte. Ltd.; APL Ltd.; Atlantic Container Line AB; China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd.; CMA CGM, S.A.; Companhia Libra de Navegacao; Compania Libra de Navegacion Uruguay S.A.; COSCO Container Lines Co. Ltd; Crowley Maritime Corporation; Delmas SAS; Evergreen Marine Corporation (Taiwan), ¨ Ltd.; Hamburg-Snud KG; Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.; Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hapag-Lloyd USA LLC; Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; MISC Berhad; Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; Norasia Container Line Ltd.; Orient Overseas Container Line, Ltd.; Pacific International Lines (Pte) Ltd.; Safmarine Container Line N.V.; United Arab Shipping Company (S.A.G.); Wan Hai Lines Ltd.; Yang Ming Transport PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Marine Corp.; and Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. Filing Party: John Longstreth, Esq.; K & L Gates LLP; 1601 K Street, NW.; Washington, DC 20006–1600. Synopsis: The amendment makes changes regarding staff compensation and updates filing counsel’s law firm’s name. Agreement No.: 011346–018. Title: Israel Trade Conference Agreement. Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd. Filing Party: Howard A. Levy, Esq.; 80 Wall Street, Suite 1117; New York, NY 10005–3602. Synopsis: The amendment adds Maersk Line Limited, acting as a single party in conjunction with A.P. MollerMaersk A/S. Agreement No.: 201197. Title: SSA Terminal (Oakland) Cooperative Working Agreement. Parties: NYK Terminal (Oakland), Inc.; NYK Line (North America), Inc.; SSA Terminals, LLC; SSA Terminals (Oakland), LLC; and Yusen Terminals, Inc. Filing Party: Robert T. Basseches, Esq.; Goodwin Procter LLP; 901 New York Avenue; Washington, DC 20001. Synopsis: The agreement would authorize the parties to establish SSA Terminals (Oakland) LLC and to discuss and agree on matters relating to marine terminal operations and services at the Port of Oakland. Dated: October 16, 2008. By order of the Federal Maritime Commission. Karen V. Gregory, Secretary. [FR Doc. E8–25095 Filed 10–21–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730–01–P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank Holding Companies The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62993-62994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION


Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for 
Review to the Office of Management and Budget

October 17, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden, invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following information collection(s), as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. An agency 
may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it 
displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject 
to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information 
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a 
valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a) Whether the 
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the 
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 
and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 
burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be 
submitted on or before November 21, 2008. If you anticipate that you 
will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within 
the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC 
contact listed below as soon as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 
Management and Budget, (202) 395-5887, or via fax at 202-395-5167 or 
via internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Judith-B. 
Herman@fcc.gov, Federal Communications Commission, or an e-mail to 
PRA@fcc.gov. To view a copy of this information collection request 
(ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web page https://reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the Web page called 
``Currently Under Review'', (3) click on the downward-pointing arrow in 
the ``Select Agency'' box below the ``Currently Under Review'' heading, 
(4) select ``Federal Communications Commission'' from the list of 
agencies presented in the ``Select Agency'' box, (5) click the 
``Submit'' button to the right of the ``Select Agency'' box, and (6) 
when the list of FCC ICRs currently under review appears, look for the 
title of this ICR (or its OMB Control Number, if there is one) and then 
click on the ICR Reference Number to view detailed information about 
this ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies 
of the information collection(s), contact Judith B. Herman at 202-418-
0214 or via the Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 3060-0511.
    Title: ARMIS Access Report.
    Report No.: FCC Report 43-04.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Number of Respondents: 76 respondents; 76 responses.
    Estimated Time per Response: 153 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement.
    Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. Statutory authority for this 
information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 161, 219(b) and 220 of 
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
    Total Annual Burden: 11,628 hours.
    Total Annual Cost: N/A.
    Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
    Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Ordinarily, questions of a 
sensitive nature are not involved in the ARMIS 43-04 Access Report. The 
Commission contends that areas in which detailed information is 
required are fully subject to regulation and the issue of data being 
regarded as sensitive will arise on special circumstances only. In such 
circumstances, the Commission instructs the respondent on the 
appropriate procedures to follow to safeguard sensitive data. 
Respondents may request confidential treatment of their documents under 
47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission's rules.
    Needs and Uses: The Federal Communications Commission is submitting 
this information collection (IC) to the OMB as an extension during this 
comment period to obtain the full three-year clearance from them. The 
Commission is reporting a -918 burden hour reduction (adjustment). This 
adjustment is due to fewer respondents (from 82 to 76 from the last 
time this information collection was submitted to the OMB). Therefore, 
the total annual burden hours are now estimated at 11,628 hours.
    The Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS), 
Report 43-04, Access Report provides jurisdictional separations and 
access charge data by Part 36 category of the Commission's rules and 
regulations. The ARMIS Report 43-04 monitors revenue requirements, 
joint cost allocations, jurisdictional separations and access charges.

    Note: The Commission in its Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC 
Docket Nos. 07-21 and 05-342, 23 FCC Rcd 7302, released April 24, 
2008, granted AT&T's petition for forbearance, finding conditionally 
that AT&T, as a price cap carrier generally not subject to rate-of-
return regulation, has demonstrated that forbearance from enforcing 
the Cost Assignment Rules satisfies the

[[Page 62994]]

standard for forbearance under section 10 of the Act. Specially, the 
Commission concluded that there is no current need to apply the Cost 
Assignment Rules to AT&T. In addition, the Commission stated that 
LECs similarly situated to AT&T are free to seek comparable 
forbearance relief. Among other things, AT&T asked for forbearance 
from four of the Commission's reporting requirements, including the 
Access Report (ARMIS 43-04.) As a condition of this forbearance, the 
Commission required AT&T to file a compliance plan, which must 
include, among other things, a description of its imputation 
methodology. AT&T must demonstrate that its access charge imputation 
methodologies remain consistent with section 272(e)(3) of the 
Communications rules and the Section 272 Sunset Order. In 
particular, AT&T's compliance plan must describe how it will account 
for imputed tariff rates given the grant of the requested 
forbearance from section 32.5280(b) and (c) of the Commission's 
rules. The Commission required that AT&T describe in detail how it 
will continue to fulfill its statutory and regulatory obligations, 
including section 254(k), and the conditions of this Order. The 
relief granted in this Order will not become effective unless and 
until AT&T's plan is approved. The compliance plan must also include 
AT&T's first annual certification that it will comply with its 
obligations under section 254(k) in the absence of the Cost 
Assignment Rules and will provide any requested cost accounting 
information necessary to prove such compliance. Also, the Commission 
required AT&T to include a proposal for how it will maintain its 
accounting procedures and data in a manner that will allow it to 
provide useable information on a timely basis if requested by the 
Commission to comply with any of the conditions of this relief and 
its commitment to the Commission. Finally, the plan must include an 
explanation of the transition process that AT&T will undertake, 
including an expected schedule, to discontinue compliance with Cost 
Assignment Rules and replace them with the procedures outlined in 
its compliance plan upon approval of the plan. The Commission 
delegated to the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) 
to prescribe the administrative requirements of the filing and to 
approve the plan when the Bureau is satisfied that AT&T will 
implement a method of preserving the integrity of its accounting 
system in the absence of the Cost Assignment Rules. Upon approval, 
the Bureau will release a public notice notifying the public of 
approval of the plan.

    In the Commission's Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking WC Docket No. 08-190, et al., FCC 08-203, released 
September 6, 2008, it noted that in this proceeding parties have raised 
the issue of the overlap between the ARMIS requirements at issue in 
this proceeding and certain cost assignment relief previously granted 
to AT&T. Because the Commission found that the reasoning of the AT&T 
Cost Assignment Forbearance Order applies to Verizon and Qwest, it took 
the opportunity, on its own motion, to extend to them the conditional 
forbearance granted in the AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order, 
subject to approval of their compliance plan.
    The Commission uses an indexed revenue threshold to determine which 
carriers are required to file the ARMIS reports. The current revenue 
threshold between Class A carriers and Class B carriers is $138 million 
and the revenue threshold between larger Class A carriers and mid-sized 
carriers is $8.181 billion.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-25191 Filed 10-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.