Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for Review to the Office of Management and Budget, 62993-62994 [E8-25191]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 22, 2008 / Notices
its Form 395-B to determine what
changes were needed to comply with
the new OMB standards, and whether it
could conform Form 395–B to those
standards consistent with Section 334 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’). 47 U.S.C. 334; see
2004 Order at 9978.
With the EEOC’s release of the EEO–
1 incorporating revised racial and
employment categories, the FCC’s
Media Bureau sought public comment
(‘‘Media Bureau Seeks Comment on
Possible Changes to FCC Forms 395–A
and 395–B,’’ Public Notice DA 08–752,
released April 11, 2008; 73 FR 21346,
April 21, 2008) (‘‘Public Notice’’) on
whether to incorporate the EEOC’s
revised categories and whether such
changes would be consistent with
Section 334 of the Act. The public
comment period ended on June 6, 2008,
and the Commission completed its
review of all the comments and reply
comments. The Commission did not
receive any comments opposing the
incorporation of the EEOC’s revised
categories in the FCC’s annual
employment reports.
The Commission concluded that the
proposed changes to FCC Form 395–B
are consistent with Section 334 of the
Act, which allows the FCC to make nonsubstantive technical or clerical
revisions to annual employment reports
in order to reflect changes in, inter alia,
terminology. Because these changes do
not subtract any information requested
on the form, but rather seek more detail
on race identification and official/
manager occupations, with minor
changes in terminology, we concluded
that they are consistent with Section
334. 47 U.S.C. 334.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–25189 Filed 10–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information
Collection(s) Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management
and Budget
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
October 17, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burden,
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collection(s), as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Oct 21, 2008
Jkt 217001
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
does not display a valid control number.
Comments are requested concerning (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before November 21,
2008. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting PRA comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the FCC contact listed below as
soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, (202) 395–
5887, or via fax at 202–395–5167 or via
internet at
Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and
to Judith-B. Herman@fcc.gov, Federal
Communications Commission, or an email to PRA@fcc.gov. To view a copy of
this information collection request (ICR)
submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web
page https://reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the
Web page called ‘‘Currently Under
Review’’, (3) click on the downwardpointing arrow in the ‘‘Select Agency’’
box below the ‘‘Currently Under
Review’’ heading, (4) select ‘‘Federal
Communications Commission’’ from the
list of agencies presented in the ‘‘Select
Agency’’ box, (5) click the ‘‘Submit’’
button to the right of the ‘‘Select
Agency’’ box, and (6) when the list of
FCC ICRs currently under review
appears, look for the title of this ICR (or
its OMB Control Number, if there is one)
and then click on the ICR Reference
Number to view detailed information
about this ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection(s), contact Judith
B. Herman at 202–418–0214 or via the
Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060–0511.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62993
Title: ARMIS Access Report.
Report No.: FCC Report 43–04.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit.
Number of Respondents: 76
respondents; 76 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 153
hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual
reporting requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Mandatory.
Statutory authority for this information
collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 161,
219(b) and 220 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended.
Total Annual Burden: 11,628 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Ordinarily, questions of a sensitive
nature are not involved in the ARMIS
43–04 Access Report. The Commission
contends that areas in which detailed
information is required are fully subject
to regulation and the issue of data being
regarded as sensitive will arise on
special circumstances only. In such
circumstances, the Commission
instructs the respondent on the
appropriate procedures to follow to
safeguard sensitive data. Respondents
may request confidential treatment of
their documents under 47 CFR 0.459 of
the Commission’s rules.
Needs and Uses: The Federal
Communications Commission is
submitting this information collection
(IC) to the OMB as an extension during
this comment period to obtain the full
three-year clearance from them. The
Commission is reporting a ¥918 burden
hour reduction (adjustment). This
adjustment is due to fewer respondents
(from 82 to 76 from the last time this
information collection was submitted to
the OMB). Therefore, the total annual
burden hours are now estimated at
11,628 hours.
The Automated Reporting
Management Information System
(ARMIS), Report 43–04, Access Report
provides jurisdictional separations and
access charge data by Part 36 category
of the Commission’s rules and
regulations. The ARMIS Report 43–04
monitors revenue requirements, joint
cost allocations, jurisdictional
separations and access charges.
Note: The Commission in its Memorandum
Opinion and Order, WC Docket Nos. 07–21
and 05–342, 23 FCC Rcd 7302, released April
24, 2008, granted AT&T’s petition for
forbearance, finding conditionally that
AT&T, as a price cap carrier generally not
subject to rate-of-return regulation, has
demonstrated that forbearance from enforcing
the Cost Assignment Rules satisfies the
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
62994
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 22, 2008 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
standard for forbearance under section 10 of
the Act. Specially, the Commission
concluded that there is no current need to
apply the Cost Assignment Rules to AT&T. In
addition, the Commission stated that LECs
similarly situated to AT&T are free to seek
comparable forbearance relief. Among other
things, AT&T asked for forbearance from four
of the Commission’s reporting requirements,
including the Access Report (ARMIS 43–04.)
As a condition of this forbearance, the
Commission required AT&T to file a
compliance plan, which must include,
among other things, a description of its
imputation methodology. AT&T must
demonstrate that its access charge imputation
methodologies remain consistent with
section 272(e)(3) of the Communications
rules and the Section 272 Sunset Order. In
particular, AT&T’s compliance plan must
describe how it will account for imputed
tariff rates given the grant of the requested
forbearance from section 32.5280(b) and (c)
of the Commission’s rules. The Commission
required that AT&T describe in detail how it
will continue to fulfill its statutory and
regulatory obligations, including section
254(k), and the conditions of this Order. The
relief granted in this Order will not become
effective unless and until AT&T’s plan is
approved. The compliance plan must also
include AT&T’s first annual certification that
it will comply with its obligations under
section 254(k) in the absence of the Cost
Assignment Rules and will provide any
requested cost accounting information
necessary to prove such compliance. Also,
the Commission required AT&T to include a
proposal for how it will maintain its
accounting procedures and data in a manner
that will allow it to provide useable
information on a timely basis if requested by
the Commission to comply with any of the
conditions of this relief and its commitment
to the Commission. Finally, the plan must
include an explanation of the transition
process that AT&T will undertake, including
an expected schedule, to discontinue
compliance with Cost Assignment Rules and
replace them with the procedures outlined in
its compliance plan upon approval of the
plan. The Commission delegated to the Chief
of the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau)
to prescribe the administrative requirements
of the filing and to approve the plan when
the Bureau is satisfied that AT&T will
implement a method of preserving the
integrity of its accounting system in the
absence of the Cost Assignment Rules. Upon
approval, the Bureau will release a public
notice notifying the public of approval of the
plan.
In the Commission’s Memorandum
Opinion and Order and Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking WC Docket No.
08–190, et al., FCC 08–203, released
September 6, 2008, it noted that in this
proceeding parties have raised the issue
of the overlap between the ARMIS
requirements at issue in this proceeding
and certain cost assignment relief
previously granted to AT&T. Because
the Commission found that the
reasoning of the AT&T Cost Assignment
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:50 Oct 21, 2008
Jkt 217001
Forbearance Order applies to Verizon
and Qwest, it took the opportunity, on
its own motion, to extend to them the
conditional forbearance granted in the
AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance
Order, subject to approval of their
compliance plan.
The Commission uses an indexed
revenue threshold to determine which
carriers are required to file the ARMIS
reports. The current revenue threshold
between Class A carriers and Class B
carriers is $138 million and the revenue
threshold between larger Class A
carriers and mid-sized carriers is $8.181
billion.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–25191 Filed 10–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on agreements to the Secretary, Federal
Maritime Commission, Washington, DC
20573, within ten days of the date this
notice appears in the Federal Register.
Copies of agreements are available
through the Commission’s Web site
(https://www.fmc.gov) or contacting the
Office of Agreements at (202) 523–5793
or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 010099–048.
Title: International Council of
Containership Operators.
Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S; ANL
Container Line Pty Ltd.; American
President Lines, Ltd.; APL Co. Pte. Ltd.;
APL Ltd.; Atlantic Container Line AB;
China Shipping Container Lines Co.,
Ltd.; CMA CGM, S.A.; Companhia Libra
de Navegacao; Compania Libra de
Navegacion Uruguay S.A.; COSCO
Container Lines Co. Ltd; Crowley
Maritime Corporation; Delmas SAS;
Evergreen Marine Corporation (Taiwan),
¨
Ltd.; Hamburg-Snud KG; Hanjin
Shipping Co., Ltd.; Hapag-Lloyd AG;
Hapag-Lloyd USA LLC; Hyundai
Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Kawasaki
Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; MISC Berhad;
Mediterranean Shipping Co. S.A.;
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Neptune
Orient Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen
Kaisha; Norasia Container Line Ltd.;
Orient Overseas Container Line, Ltd.;
Pacific International Lines (Pte) Ltd.;
Safmarine Container Line N.V.; United
Arab Shipping Company (S.A.G.); Wan
Hai Lines Ltd.; Yang Ming Transport
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Marine Corp.; and Zim Integrated
Shipping Services Ltd.
Filing Party: John Longstreth, Esq.; K
& L Gates LLP; 1601 K Street, NW.;
Washington, DC 20006–1600.
Synopsis: The amendment makes
changes regarding staff compensation
and updates filing counsel’s law firm’s
name.
Agreement No.: 011346–018.
Title: Israel Trade Conference
Agreement.
Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and
Zim Integrated Shipping Services, Ltd.
Filing Party: Howard A. Levy, Esq.; 80
Wall Street, Suite 1117; New York, NY
10005–3602.
Synopsis: The amendment adds
Maersk Line Limited, acting as a single
party in conjunction with A.P. MollerMaersk A/S.
Agreement No.: 201197.
Title: SSA Terminal (Oakland)
Cooperative Working Agreement.
Parties: NYK Terminal (Oakland),
Inc.; NYK Line (North America), Inc.;
SSA Terminals, LLC; SSA Terminals
(Oakland), LLC; and Yusen Terminals,
Inc.
Filing Party: Robert T. Basseches,
Esq.; Goodwin Procter LLP; 901 New
York Avenue; Washington, DC 20001.
Synopsis: The agreement would
authorize the parties to establish SSA
Terminals (Oakland) LLC and to discuss
and agree on matters relating to marine
terminal operations and services at the
Port of Oakland.
Dated: October 16, 2008.
By order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–25095 Filed 10–21–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank
Holding Companies
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank
holding company. The factors that are
considered in acting on the notices are
set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12
U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The notices are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices
also will be available for inspection at
the office of the Board of Governors.
Interested persons may express their
E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM
22OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62993-62994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
Notice of Public Information Collection(s) Being Submitted for
Review to the Office of Management and Budget
October 17, 2008.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on the following information collection(s), as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject
to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that does not display a
valid control number. Comments are requested concerning (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments should be
submitted on or before November 21, 2008. If you anticipate that you
will be submitting PRA comments, but find it difficult to do so within
the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the FCC
contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of
Management and Budget, (202) 395-5887, or via fax at 202-395-5167 or
via internet at Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Judith-B.
Herman@fcc.gov, Federal Communications Commission, or an e-mail to
PRA@fcc.gov. To view a copy of this information collection request
(ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web page https://reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the Web page called
``Currently Under Review'', (3) click on the downward-pointing arrow in
the ``Select Agency'' box below the ``Currently Under Review'' heading,
(4) select ``Federal Communications Commission'' from the list of
agencies presented in the ``Select Agency'' box, (5) click the
``Submit'' button to the right of the ``Select Agency'' box, and (6)
when the list of FCC ICRs currently under review appears, look for the
title of this ICR (or its OMB Control Number, if there is one) and then
click on the ICR Reference Number to view detailed information about
this ICR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies
of the information collection(s), contact Judith B. Herman at 202-418-
0214 or via the Internet at Judith-B.Herman@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: 3060-0511.
Title: ARMIS Access Report.
Report No.: FCC Report 43-04.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 76 respondents; 76 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 153 hours.
Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Mandatory. Statutory authority for this
information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. 161, 219(b) and 220 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
Total Annual Burden: 11,628 hours.
Total Annual Cost: N/A.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Ordinarily, questions of a
sensitive nature are not involved in the ARMIS 43-04 Access Report. The
Commission contends that areas in which detailed information is
required are fully subject to regulation and the issue of data being
regarded as sensitive will arise on special circumstances only. In such
circumstances, the Commission instructs the respondent on the
appropriate procedures to follow to safeguard sensitive data.
Respondents may request confidential treatment of their documents under
47 CFR 0.459 of the Commission's rules.
Needs and Uses: The Federal Communications Commission is submitting
this information collection (IC) to the OMB as an extension during this
comment period to obtain the full three-year clearance from them. The
Commission is reporting a -918 burden hour reduction (adjustment). This
adjustment is due to fewer respondents (from 82 to 76 from the last
time this information collection was submitted to the OMB). Therefore,
the total annual burden hours are now estimated at 11,628 hours.
The Automated Reporting Management Information System (ARMIS),
Report 43-04, Access Report provides jurisdictional separations and
access charge data by Part 36 category of the Commission's rules and
regulations. The ARMIS Report 43-04 monitors revenue requirements,
joint cost allocations, jurisdictional separations and access charges.
Note: The Commission in its Memorandum Opinion and Order, WC
Docket Nos. 07-21 and 05-342, 23 FCC Rcd 7302, released April 24,
2008, granted AT&T's petition for forbearance, finding conditionally
that AT&T, as a price cap carrier generally not subject to rate-of-
return regulation, has demonstrated that forbearance from enforcing
the Cost Assignment Rules satisfies the
[[Page 62994]]
standard for forbearance under section 10 of the Act. Specially, the
Commission concluded that there is no current need to apply the Cost
Assignment Rules to AT&T. In addition, the Commission stated that
LECs similarly situated to AT&T are free to seek comparable
forbearance relief. Among other things, AT&T asked for forbearance
from four of the Commission's reporting requirements, including the
Access Report (ARMIS 43-04.) As a condition of this forbearance, the
Commission required AT&T to file a compliance plan, which must
include, among other things, a description of its imputation
methodology. AT&T must demonstrate that its access charge imputation
methodologies remain consistent with section 272(e)(3) of the
Communications rules and the Section 272 Sunset Order. In
particular, AT&T's compliance plan must describe how it will account
for imputed tariff rates given the grant of the requested
forbearance from section 32.5280(b) and (c) of the Commission's
rules. The Commission required that AT&T describe in detail how it
will continue to fulfill its statutory and regulatory obligations,
including section 254(k), and the conditions of this Order. The
relief granted in this Order will not become effective unless and
until AT&T's plan is approved. The compliance plan must also include
AT&T's first annual certification that it will comply with its
obligations under section 254(k) in the absence of the Cost
Assignment Rules and will provide any requested cost accounting
information necessary to prove such compliance. Also, the Commission
required AT&T to include a proposal for how it will maintain its
accounting procedures and data in a manner that will allow it to
provide useable information on a timely basis if requested by the
Commission to comply with any of the conditions of this relief and
its commitment to the Commission. Finally, the plan must include an
explanation of the transition process that AT&T will undertake,
including an expected schedule, to discontinue compliance with Cost
Assignment Rules and replace them with the procedures outlined in
its compliance plan upon approval of the plan. The Commission
delegated to the Chief of the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau)
to prescribe the administrative requirements of the filing and to
approve the plan when the Bureau is satisfied that AT&T will
implement a method of preserving the integrity of its accounting
system in the absence of the Cost Assignment Rules. Upon approval,
the Bureau will release a public notice notifying the public of
approval of the plan.
In the Commission's Memorandum Opinion and Order and Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking WC Docket No. 08-190, et al., FCC 08-203, released
September 6, 2008, it noted that in this proceeding parties have raised
the issue of the overlap between the ARMIS requirements at issue in
this proceeding and certain cost assignment relief previously granted
to AT&T. Because the Commission found that the reasoning of the AT&T
Cost Assignment Forbearance Order applies to Verizon and Qwest, it took
the opportunity, on its own motion, to extend to them the conditional
forbearance granted in the AT&T Cost Assignment Forbearance Order,
subject to approval of their compliance plan.
The Commission uses an indexed revenue threshold to determine which
carriers are required to file the ARMIS reports. The current revenue
threshold between Class A carriers and Class B carriers is $138 million
and the revenue threshold between larger Class A carriers and mid-sized
carriers is $8.181 billion.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-25191 Filed 10-21-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P