Draft Modification to the NPDES General Permit for Oil and Gas Exploration, Development and Production Facilities in State and Federal Waters in Cook Inlet, AK, Permit No. AKG-31-5000 (Permit), 62497-62498 [E8-25075]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8731–6]
Draft Modification to the NPDES
General Permit for Oil and Gas
Exploration, Development and
Production Facilities in State and
Federal Waters in Cook Inlet, AK,
Permit No. AKG–31–5000 (Permit)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft
modification to NPDES general permit.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Director, Office of Water
and Watersheds, EPA Region 10, is
issuing a draft modification to the
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) general
permit in response to a settlement
agreement between Union Oil Company
of California and XTO Energy, Inc.
(Petitioners) and EPA (Ninth Circuit,
Case No. 07–72656). On May 25, 2007,
EPA issued the final Permit, with an
effective date of July 2, 2007 (May 31,
2007, 72 FR 30377). The Permit
included the following provisions,
among others:
1. Condition II.A.10: ‘‘If any
discharges are commingled, the most
stringent effluent limitations for each
individual discharge shall be applied to
the resulting discharge. If the Individual
discharge is not authorized, the
commingled discharge is not
authorized. Monitoring for compliance
with technology based limits, such as
the oil and grease concentration of
produced water must be accomplished
prior to commingling.’’
2. Condition II.C.3: ‘‘Commingled
Waste Streams. If deck drainage is
commingled with produced water, then
this discharge shall be considered
produced water for monitoring purposes
(see Section II.G). However, samples
collected for compliance with the
produced water oil and grease limits
shall be taken prior to commingling the
produced water stream with deck
drainage or any other waste stream. The
estimated deck drainage flow rate must
be reported in the comment section of
the DMR (i.e., discharge monitoring
report).’’
3. Table 7–A, Footnote 1: ‘‘The
sample type shall be either grab, or a 24hour composite which consists of the
arithmetic average of the results of 4
grab samples taken over a 24-hour
period. If a sample is unavailable to be
analyzed and the permittee has
explained the reason in the DMR,
averaging of the remaining samples is
permitted. Samples shall be collected
prior to the addition of any seawater to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
the produced water waste stream. See
Section II.G.6.b of this Permit.’’
On July 3, 2007, Petitioners filed the
Petition for Review, challenging the
three provisions of the Permit set forth
above. On the same date, Petitioners
filed an Emergency Motion for Stay
Under Circuit Rule 27–3, requesting the
Court stay the three highlighted
sentences above (the ‘‘contested terms’’).
EPA did not oppose the Emergency Stay
and on July 5, 2007, the Court issued an
order granting Petitioners’ Emergency
Motion for Stay of the contested Permit
provisions.
On August 21, 2008, after EPA
reviewed the basis for the contested
terms, EPA and Petitioners reached a
settlement agreement. Under this
agreement, EPA agreed to modify the
Permit, and publish in the Federal
Register, pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62, a
proposal to modify the Permit by
removing the third sentence of
Condition II.A.10, the second sentence
of Condition II.C.3, and the fourth
sentence of Footnote 1 to Table 7–A,
from the Permit. Intervenor Cook
Inletkeeper did not object to the
settlement agreement. A fact sheet has
been prepared which explains EPA’s
rationale for the proposed Permit
modification.
Public Comment: EPA will only be
accepting comments on the proposed
modification of the Permit. Interested
persons may submit written comments
on the draft Permit modification to the
attention of Hanh Shaw at the address
below. Copies of the draft modification
and fact sheet are available upon
request. The Permit modification and
fact sheet may also be downloaded from
the Region 10 Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/r10earth/
waterpermits.htm (click on draft
permits, then Alaska). All comments
must include the name, address, and
telephone number of the commenter
and a concise statement of comment and
the relevant facts upon which it is
based. Comments of either support or
concern which are directed at specific,
cited permit requirements are
appreciated.
After the expiration date of the Public
Notice on November 20, 2008, the
Director, Office of Water and
Watersheds, EPA Region 10, will make
a final determination with respect to
issuance of the Permit modification. The
proposed changes contained in the draft
modification will become final upon
issuance if no significant comments are
received during the public comment
period.
DATES: Comments must be received or
postmarked by November 20, 2008.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62497
Comments on the proposed
Permit modification should be sent to
Director, Office of Water and
Watersheds; USEPA Region 10; 1200 6th
Ave., Suite 900, OWW–130; Seattle,
Washington 98101. Comments may also
be received via electronic mail at
shaw.hanh@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information can be obtained
by contacting Hanh Shaw at the address
above, or by visiting the Region 10 Web
site at https://www.epa.gov/r10earth/
waterpermits.htm. Requests may also be
made to Audrey Washington at (206)
553–0523, or electronically mailed to:
washington.audrey@epa.gov.
Other Legal Requirements
State Water Quality Standards and
State Certification
The Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation (ADEC)
intends to waive the Permit under
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act
since State water quality standards are
not affected by the modification.
Endangered Species Act
EPA has determined that issuance of
the Permit modification would have no
effect on any threatened or endangered
species, nor designated critical habitat.
Executive Order 12866
EPA has determined that this Permit
modification is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 and is therefore
not subject to OMB review.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements of this permit were
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
and assigned OMB control numbers
2040–0086 and 2040–0110.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that EPA
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
for rules subject to the requirements of
5 U.S.C. 553(b) that have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. However, general NPDES
permits are not ‘‘rules’’ subject to the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b), and is
therefore not subject to the RFA.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 201 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, generally requires Federal
agencies to assess the effects of their
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
62498
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
‘‘regulatory actions’’ (defined to be the
same as ‘‘rules’’ subject to the RFA) on
tribal, state, and local governments and
the private sector. However, general
NPDES permits are not ‘‘rules’’ subject
to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b),
and is therefore not subject to the RFA.
Signed this 10th day of October, 2008.
Michael F. Gearheard,
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10.
[FR Doc. E8–25075 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8730–9]
Proposed Agreement and Covenant
Not To Sue for 2800 South Sacramento
Superfund Site (a/k/a ‘‘Celotex Site’’),
Chicago, IL
Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’).
ACTION: Notice of proposed agreement;
request for public comment.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
proposed Agreement and Covenant Not
to Sue (Prospective Purchaser
Agreement) acquisition of the 2800
Sacramento Superfund Site (the
‘‘Celotex Site’’) by the City of Chicago
and the Chicago Park District (‘‘City
Parties’’) has been negotiated by the
United States Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’) and the City Parties
subject to the final review and approval
of the EPA and the U.S. Department of
Justice. The proposed Prospective
Purchaser Agreement relates to the City
Parties’ plan to take ownership of the
land and build a park at the Celotex
Site. The City Parties are not Potentially
Responsible Parties at the Site. Pursuant
to the Prospective Purchaser Agreement,
the City Parties will develop the
property as a public park utilizing
certain sustainable development
practices, in exchange for a covenant by
EPA not to sue the City Parties regarding
the Existing Contamination at the Site
pursuant to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation,
and Liability Act of 1980, as amended,
42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. (‘‘CERCLA’’).
DATES: EPA will receive written
comments by November 20, 2008
relating to the above referenced
Prospective Purchaser Agreement. EPA
will consider all comments received and
will only sign the Prospective Purchaser
Agreement after the public comment
period has ended and after it has
considered all comments received.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
EPA’s response to any
comments and the proposed Prospective
Purchaser Agreement is available for
public inspection at the EPA Superfund
Record Center, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604–3590. Comments and request for
copies of the proposed Prospective
Purchaser Agreement should be
addressed to Karen L. Peaceman,
Associate Regional Counsel, EPA Region
5, Mail Code C–14J, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604–
3590; E-mail: Peaceman.karen@epa.gov
and should reference the 2800 South
Sacramento Avenue Superfund Site,
Chicago, Illinois. A copy of the
proposed Prospective Purchaser
Agreement may also be found at
https://www.epa.gov/region5/sites/
celotex/index.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen L. Peaceman, Associate Regional
Counsel, EPA Region 5, Mail Code C–
14J, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604–3590, (312)
353–5751.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: October 10, 2008.
Richard C. Karl,
Director, Superfund Division, Region 5.
[FR Doc. E8–24877 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–M
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[OW–2003–0064, FRL–8731–1]
U.S. EPA’s National Clean Water Act
Recognition Awards Presentation
During the Water Environment
Federation’s Technical Exposition and
Conference (WEFTEC), and
Announcement of 2008 National
Awards Winners
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency recognized municipalities and
industries for outstanding and
innovative technological achievements
in wastewater treatment and pollution
abatement programs. An inscribed
plaque was presented to first and
second place national winners at the
annual Clean Water Act Recognition
Awards presentation during the Water
Environment Federation’s Technical
Exposition and Conference (WEFTEC).
Recognition is made for outstanding
programs and projects in operations and
maintenance at wastewater treatment
facilities, biosolids management and
public acceptance, municipal
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
implementation and enforcement of
local pretreatment programs, costeffective storm water controls, and
combined sewer overflow controls. This
action announces the 2008 national
awards winners.
DATES: Monday, October 20, 2008, 11:30
a.m. to 1 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The national awards
presentation ceremony was held at the
Hyatt Regency McCormick Place,
Chicago, Illinois.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Richardson, Telephone: (202)
564–2947. Facsimile Number: (202)
501–2396. E-Mail:
richardson.matthew@epa.gov. Also visit
the Office of Wastewater Management’s
Web page at https://www.epa.gov/owm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean
Water Act Recognition Awards are
authorized by section 501(a) and (e) of
the Clean Water Act, and 33 U.S.C.
1361(a) and (e). Applications and
nominations for the national awards are
recommended by EPA regions. The
regulation that establishes the
framework for the annual recognition
awards program is at 40 CFR part 105.
EPA announced the availability of
application and nomination information
for this year’s awards (73 FR 16299,
March 27, 2008). The awards program
enhances national awareness of
municipal wastewater treatment and
encourages public support of programs
targeted to protecting the public’s health
and safety and the nation’s water
quality. State water pollution control
agencies and EPA regional offices make
recommendations to headquarters for
the national awards. Programs and
projects being recognized are in
compliance with applicable water
quality requirements and have a
satisfactory record with respect to
environmental quality. Municipalities
and industries are recognized for their
demonstrated creativity and
technological achievements in five
awards categories as follows:
(1) Outstanding Operations and
Maintenance practices at wastewater
treatment facilities;
(2) Exemplary Biosolids Management
projects, technology/innovation or
development activities, research and
public acceptance efforts;
(3) Pretreatment Program Excellence;
(4) Stormwater Management
Excellence; and,
(5) Outstanding Combined Sewer
Overflow Control programs. The
winners of the EPA’s 2008 National
Clean Water Act Recognition Awards
are listed below by category.
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62497-62498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25075]
[[Page 62497]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8731-6]
Draft Modification to the NPDES General Permit for Oil and Gas
Exploration, Development and Production Facilities in State and Federal
Waters in Cook Inlet, AK, Permit No. AKG-31-5000 (Permit)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of draft modification to NPDES general
permit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, EPA Region 10,
is issuing a draft modification to the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) general permit in response to a settlement
agreement between Union Oil Company of California and XTO Energy, Inc.
(Petitioners) and EPA (Ninth Circuit, Case No. 07-72656). On May 25,
2007, EPA issued the final Permit, with an effective date of July 2,
2007 (May 31, 2007, 72 FR 30377). The Permit included the following
provisions, among others:
1. Condition II.A.10: ``If any discharges are commingled, the most
stringent effluent limitations for each individual discharge shall be
applied to the resulting discharge. If the Individual discharge is not
authorized, the commingled discharge is not authorized. Monitoring for
compliance with technology based limits, such as the oil and grease
concentration of produced water must be accomplished prior to
commingling.''
2. Condition II.C.3: ``Commingled Waste Streams. If deck drainage
is commingled with produced water, then this discharge shall be
considered produced water for monitoring purposes (see Section II.G).
However, samples collected for compliance with the produced water oil
and grease limits shall be taken prior to commingling the produced
water stream with deck drainage or any other waste stream. The
estimated deck drainage flow rate must be reported in the comment
section of the DMR (i.e., discharge monitoring report).''
3. Table 7-A, Footnote 1: ``The sample type shall be either grab,
or a 24-hour composite which consists of the arithmetic average of the
results of 4 grab samples taken over a 24-hour period. If a sample is
unavailable to be analyzed and the permittee has explained the reason
in the DMR, averaging of the remaining samples is permitted. Samples
shall be collected prior to the addition of any seawater to the
produced water waste stream. See Section II.G.6.b of this Permit.''
On July 3, 2007, Petitioners filed the Petition for Review, challenging
the three provisions of the Permit set forth above. On the same date,
Petitioners filed an Emergency Motion for Stay Under Circuit Rule 27-3,
requesting the Court stay the three highlighted sentences above (the
``contested terms''). EPA did not oppose the Emergency Stay and on July
5, 2007, the Court issued an order granting Petitioners' Emergency
Motion for Stay of the contested Permit provisions.
On August 21, 2008, after EPA reviewed the basis for the contested
terms, EPA and Petitioners reached a settlement agreement. Under this
agreement, EPA agreed to modify the Permit, and publish in the Federal
Register, pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62, a proposal to modify the Permit by
removing the third sentence of Condition II.A.10, the second sentence
of Condition II.C.3, and the fourth sentence of Footnote 1 to Table 7-
A, from the Permit. Intervenor Cook Inletkeeper did not object to the
settlement agreement. A fact sheet has been prepared which explains
EPA's rationale for the proposed Permit modification.
Public Comment: EPA will only be accepting comments on the proposed
modification of the Permit. Interested persons may submit written
comments on the draft Permit modification to the attention of Hanh Shaw
at the address below. Copies of the draft modification and fact sheet
are available upon request. The Permit modification and fact sheet may
also be downloaded from the Region 10 Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
r10earth/waterpermits.htm (click on draft permits, then Alaska). All
comments must include the name, address, and telephone number of the
commenter and a concise statement of comment and the relevant facts
upon which it is based. Comments of either support or concern which are
directed at specific, cited permit requirements are appreciated.
After the expiration date of the Public Notice on November 20,
2008, the Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, EPA Region 10, will
make a final determination with respect to issuance of the Permit
modification. The proposed changes contained in the draft modification
will become final upon issuance if no significant comments are received
during the public comment period.
DATES: Comments must be received or postmarked by November 20, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed Permit modification should be sent
to Director, Office of Water and Watersheds; USEPA Region 10; 1200 6th
Ave., Suite 900, OWW-130; Seattle, Washington 98101. Comments may also
be received via electronic mail at shaw.hanh@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Additional information can be obtained
by contacting Hanh Shaw at the address above, or by visiting the Region
10 Web site at https://www.epa.gov/r10earth/waterpermits.htm. Requests
may also be made to Audrey Washington at (206) 553-0523, or
electronically mailed to: washington.audrey@epa.gov.
Other Legal Requirements
State Water Quality Standards and State Certification
The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) intends
to waive the Permit under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act since
State water quality standards are not affected by the modification.
Endangered Species Act
EPA has determined that issuance of the Permit modification would
have no effect on any threatened or endangered species, nor designated
critical habitat.
Executive Order 12866
EPA has determined that this Permit modification is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order
12866 and is therefore not subject to OMB review.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements of this permit were
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
and assigned OMB control numbers 2040-0086 and 2040-0110.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
requires that EPA prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis for rules
subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) that have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. However, general
NPDES permits are not ``rules'' subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C.
553(b), and is therefore not subject to the RFA.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), Public Law
104-4, generally requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their
[[Page 62498]]
``regulatory actions'' (defined to be the same as ``rules'' subject to
the RFA) on tribal, state, and local governments and the private
sector. However, general NPDES permits are not ``rules'' subject to the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b), and is therefore not subject to the
RFA.
Signed this 10th day of October, 2008.
Michael F. Gearheard,
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 10.
[FR Doc. E8-25075 Filed 10-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P