Stewardship Contracting, FSH 2409.19, Chapter 60, 62463-62465 [E8-25066]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
RIN 0596–AC45
Stewardship Contracting, FSH 2409.19,
Chapter 60
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of issuance of final
directive; response to comment.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is issuing
a final directive to Forest Service
Handbook 2409.19, chapter 60,
Stewardship Contracting. The directive
provides direction to implement the
provisions as authorized in the Tribal
Forest Protection Act (TFPA) of 2004
(25 U.S.C. 3115a). On December 26,
2006, the Forest Service published in
the Federal Register for public notice
and comments an interim directive
regarding guidance for, TFPA proposals.
The agency considered all the
comments and made a number of
changes to the final directive in
response.
DATES: Final directive 2409.19_60 is
effective October 21, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The full text of the final
directive is available electronically on
the World Wide Web at https://
www.fs.fed.us/im/directives. The
administrative record for this final
directive is available for inspection and
copying at the office of the Director,
Office of Tribal Relations, USDA Forest
Service, 2nd Floor Central, Sidney R.
Yates Federal Building, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Those wishing to inspect the
administrative record are encouraged to
call Marsha Butterfield at (202) 205–
4095 beforehand to facilitate access to
the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marsha Butterfield, Office of Tribal
Relations, USDA Forest Service, (202)
205–4095.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest
Service Directive System consists of the
Forest Service Manual (FSM) and the
Forest Service Handbook (FSH), which
contain the Agency’s policies, practices,
and procedures and serve as the primary
basis for the internal management and
control of programs and administrative
direction to Forest Service employees.
The directives for all agency programs
are set out on the World Wide Web/
Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/im/
directives.
The FSM contains legal authorities,
objectives, policies, responsibilities,
instructions, and guidance needed on a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
continuing basis by Forest Service line
officers and primary staff to plan and
execute programs and activities, while
the FSH is the principal source of
specialized guidance and instruction for
carrying out the policies, objectives, and
responsibilities contained in the FSM.
On December 26, 2006, the Forest
Service published an interim directive
in the Federal Register (71 FR 247) for
60-day public notice and comment. The
Forest Service received six letters in
response to the interim directive.
Comments received were from Tribes or
Tribal Organizations. A summary of
comments received and the agency’s
responses follow:
General Comments
The Forest Service appreciates the
comments that were provided.
Generally, respondents like and support
the policy. Respondents strongly
supported the availability of sole source
contracting authorities and the section
giving clear direction that the agency
may provide advice and information to
Indian tribes in advance of tribes’
submitting TFPA proposals. Several
respondents felt partnerships and trust
obligations seem to be what is missing
from the draft policy. Forest Service
Manual 1563.04g (FSM) directs Forest
Supervisors to seek opportunities to
develop partnerships with Tribes under
all appropriate Forest Service
authorities.
Comment. Several respondents felt
the policy was difficult to figure out
without the benefit and context of the
surrounding provisions into which the
new provisions are being inserted.
Response. The complete text of
chapter 60, FSH 2409.19 was available
for review. The agency did not receive
any requests for the complete text.
Comments on Specific Sections of the
TFPA
Section 60.3 Policy. This section adds
new direction for preliminary
collaboration and evaluations for a
potential Tribal Forest Protection Act
project.
Comment. Respondents strongly
supported clear direction that the Forest
Service may provide advice and
information to Indian Tribes in
developing TFPA proposals.
Response. The agency is committed to
implementation of the TFPA and
providing assistance and advice in
potential TFPA proposals.
Section 60.4 Responsibility. This
section updates responsibilities of the
Regional Foresters, Forest Supervisors,
District Rangers, Director of Forest
Management, and Director of Office of
Tribal Relations.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62463
Comment. Respondents appreciated
the policy including agency
consultation with a potential applicant
tribe before it develops and submits its
application.
Response. The agency is committed to
the implementation of the TFPA and
consultation with Tribes.
Section 60.5 Definitions. This section
adds definitions for Bordering on and
Adjacent to, Indian Forest Land and
Rangeland, Indian Tribe, National
Forest System Lands, Public Lands,
Secretary and Tribal Community.
Comment. Concerns were expressed
regarding the word ‘‘proximity’’ used in
the definition of ‘‘bordering on or
adjacent to.’’ There was concern that it
may be too restrictive for appropriate
implementation of the TFPA.
Respondents said there must be
flexibility in the definition so that TFPA
projects are not rejected based upon
narrow interpretations because of the
use of the word ‘‘proximity.’’ The word
‘‘proximity’’ is not used in the Act.
Response. The definition for
bordering on or adjacent to has been
removed from the final directive.
Section 60.4 Responsibilities provides
direction on determination of what
borders on or is adjacent to after
consultation with the Indian tribe.
Section 61.18 Response to Tribal
Requests Made Under the Tribal Forest
Protection Act. This section provides
direction for handling responses to
tribal requests made under the Tribal
Forest Protection Act.
Comment. Respondents were
concerned that other options available
for implementing TFPA projects, in
addition to stewardship contracting,
need to be included along with
stewardship contracting. Respondents
requested that ‘‘or other instrument’’ be
added after ‘‘stewardship contracting’’
throughout the policy. Respondents said
stewardship contracting will most likely
not be the only means by which TFPA
projects will be carried out.
Response. The words ‘‘or other
instrument’’ was added after
‘‘stewardship contracting’’ where
applicable throughout the policy.
Section 61.7 Notice of Denial Under
the Tribal Forest Protection Act. This
section provides direction for notice of
denial for projects submitted under the
Tribal Forest Protection Act.
Comment. Respondents requested
‘‘stewardship’’ be removed from Section
61.7—Notice of Denial. Respondents
expressed that Tribes enter into
agreements other than just stewardship
contracts and agreements.
Response. The word stewardship was
removed from the text.
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
62464
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
Comment. Respondents wanted
‘‘pursuant to the TFPA’’ added after
‘‘with the FS’’ to clarify the point.
Response. ‘‘Pursuant to the TFPA’’
was added after ‘‘proposal’’ for
clarification.
Section 62.14 Contract Type Under
the Tribal Forest Protection Act.
Comment. Respondents strongly
supported the availability of sole source
contracting authorities.
Response. Under the Tribal Forest
Protection Act of 2004 the Forest
Service has the authority to consider a
request made by a tribe to protect Indian
forest or range lands by resource type
projects on adjacent Federal lands. If the
proposal holds merit, the Forest Service
may award without further competition
as long as the procedures under this
authority are used.
General Response
Developing and sustaining
partnerships is a fundamental action
which facilitates the fulfillment of the
Federal trust responsibility. The trust
responsibility is a legally enforceable
obligation, a duty, on the part of the
U.S. Government to protect the rights of
Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and
Alaska Natives.
The United States Government has a
unique legal and governmental
relationship with American Indian
tribes as set forth in the U.S.
Constitution, treaties, statutes and
Federal court decisions. The Forest
Service shares in the Federal
government’s overall trust responsibility
to Indian tribes. The primary step in
fulfilling agency responsibilities is for
line officers to contact Indian tribal
governments through their elected
officials and consult with them on
proposed actions that may have an
effect on tribal rights, resources or
general interests.
Regulatory Certifications
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Regulatory Impact
This final directive has been reviewed
under USDA procedures and Executive
Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning
and Review. This final directive would
not have an annual effect of $100
million or more on the economy, nor
adversely affect productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, nor State or local
Governments. This final directive would
not interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency, nor raise
new legal or policy issues. Finally, this
final directive would not alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
such programs. Accordingly, this final
directive is not subject to OMB review
under Executive Order 12866.
Proper Consideration of Small Entities
This final directive has been
considered in light of Executive Order
13272 regarding proper consideration of
small entities and the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA), which amended the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). It has been determined that this
final directive would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined by SBREFA.
Environmental Impact
Section 31.1b of Forest Service
Handbook 1909.15 (57 FR 43180;
September 18, 1992) excludes from
documentation in an environmental
assessment or impact statement ‘‘rules,
regulations, or policies to establish
Servicewide administrative procedures,
program processes, or instructions’’ that
do not significantly affect the quality of
the human environment. This final
directive sets forth administrative
procedures for implementation of the
TFPA and, as such, has no direct effect
on Forest Service decisions for land
management activities.
No Takings Implications
This final directive is limited to
establishment of administrative
procedures to respond to American
Indian and Alaska Native proposed
work projects to enter into contracts
and/or agreements with the Forest
Service. Projects would conduct land
management activities on Forest Service
and BLM lands adjacent to Indian trust
land and Indian communities.
This final directive has been analyzed
in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights, and it has
been determined that the final directive
does not pose the risk of a taking of
private property.
Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
requires consultation with State and
local officials when planned regulations
and other policies have substantial
direct effects on the States. This final
directive establishes procedures for the
TFPA which will be administered by
the Forest Service and implemented by
participating Indian tribes. Therefore,
the agency has determined that there are
no direct effects on the States and no
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
further assessment of federalism
implications is necessary.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
In accordance with Forest Service
policy and Executive Order 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, formal
consultation was conducted with Indian
tribes on development of this new
policy in 2005. The draft TFPA policy
was sent to regional FS offices, where it
was then sent to tribes in their
respective regions that have tribal land,
rangeland, or tribal communities
bordering on or adjacent to NFS land,
for consultation with those tribes. A 60day comment period was provided for
the consultation and comment.
Energy Effects
This final directive has been reviewed
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. It has been
determined that this proposed guideline
does not constitute a significant energy
action as defined in the Executive order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, which
the President signed into law on March
22, 1995, the Department has assessed
the effects of this final directive on
Tribal governments and the private
sector. This final directive does not
compel the expenditure of $100 million
or more by any Tribal government or
anyone in the private sector. Therefore,
a statement under section 202 of the Act
is not required.
Civil Justice
This final directive has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. After adoption of this
final directive as final, (1) All State and
local laws and regulations that conflict
with this policy or that would impede
full implementation of this policy will
be preempted (2) no retroactive effect
would be given to this final directive;
and (3) this final directive would not
require the use of administrative
proceedings before parties could file
suit in court challenging its provisions.
Conclusion
This final directive implements the
provisions of the Tribal Forest
Protection Act which provides a tool for
Indian tribes, as defined by the Act, to
propose work and enter into contracts
and agreements with the Forest Service
(FS) or Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) to restore land under the
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
62465
jurisdiction of either agency, or to
reduce threats, including from fire or
disease, on FS or BLM-administered
lands adjacent to or bordering on Indian
trust land and Indian communities.
The full text of this handbook is
available on the World Wide Web at
https://www.fs.fed.us./im/directives.
Single paper copies are available upon
request from the address and telephone
numbers listed earlier in this notice as
well as from the nearest regional office,
the location of which are also available
on the Washington Office headquarters
homepage on the World Wide Web at
https://www.fs.fed.us.
Department of Commerce, Economic
Development Administration, 2008–
2010 Performance Review Board
Membership
Department of Commerce, National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration 2008–2010 Performance
Review Board Membership
Department of Commerce/Economic
Development Administration
Department of Commerce/National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration
Dated: October 9, 2008.
Charles Myers,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. E8–25066 Filed 10–17–08; 11:15
am]
Dated: October 15, 2008.
Deborah Martin,
Director, Office of Executive Resources—
Operations.
[FR Doc. E8–24942 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
Lisa Casias, Director for Financial
Management and Deputy Chief
Financial Officer (Chairperson).
Deborah Jefferson, Director for Human
Resources Management.
Otto Barry Bird, Chief Counsel for
Economic Development.
Matthew Crow, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for External Affairs.
BILLING CODE 3510–BS–P
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Membership of the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration Performance Review
Board
Membership of the Economic
Development Administration
Performance Review Board
Department of Commerce.
Notice of Membership on the
Economic Development
Administration’s Performance Review
Board.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.,
4314(c)(4), Department of Commerce
(DOC) announce the appointment of
persons to serve as members of the
Economic Development
Administration’s (EDA) Performance
Review Board (PRB). The EDA PRB is
responsible for reviewing performance
ratings, pay adjustments and bonuses of
Senior Executive Service (SES)
members, Presidential Rank Awards.
The appointment of these members will
be for a period of twenty-four (24)
months.
SUMMARY: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
4314(c)(4), Department of Commerce
(DOC) announce the appointment of
persons to serve as members of the
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration’s (NTIA)
Performance Review Board (PRB). The
NTIA PRB is responsible for reviewing
performance ratings, pay adjustments
and bonuses of Senior Executive Service
(SES) members, and Presidential Rank
Awards. The appointment of these
members will be for a period of twentyfour (24) months.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
of service of appointees to the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration Performance Review
Board is upon publication of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Martin, Director, Office of
Executive Resources—Operations,
Office of Human Resources
Management, Office of the Director,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–3130.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
names, position titles, and type of
appointment of the members of the
NTIA/PRB are set forth below:
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Effective Date: The effective date
of service of appointees to the Economic
Development Administration
Performance Review Board is upon
publication of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Martin, Director, Office of
Executive Resources—Operations,
Office of Human Resources
Management, Office of the Director,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
names, position titles, and type of
appointment of the members of the
EDA/PRB are set forth below:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Membership on the
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration’s
Performance Review Board.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Daniel C. Hurley, Director,
Communications and Information
Infrastructure Assurance Program
(Chairperson).
Bernadette McGuire-Rivera, Associate
Administrator for
Telecommunications and
Information Applications.
Renee Macklin, Chief Information
Officer, International Trade
Administration.
Alan W. Vincent, Associate
Administrator for
Telecommunications Sciences and
Director, Institute for
Telecommunication Sciences.
Michael J. Crison, Director,
Requirements, Planning and
Systems Integration Division.
Karl B. Nebbia, Associate Administrator
for Spectrum Management.
Dated: October 15, 2008.
Deborah Martin,
Director, Office of Executive Resources—
Operations.
[FR Doc. E8–24943 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–BS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–533–847)
1–Hydroxyethylidene–1, 1–
Diphosphonic Acid from India: Notice
of Preliminary Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value and
Postponement of Final Determination
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Commerce (the Department)
preliminarily determines that 1–
hydroxyethylidene–1, 1–diphosphonic
acid (HEDP) from India is being, or is
likely to be, sold in the United States at
less than fair value (LTFV), as provided
in section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). The
estimated margins of sales at LTFV are
listed in the ‘‘Preliminary
Determination’’ section of this notice.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination. Pursuant to requests
from interested parties, we are
postponing for 60 days the final
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62463-62465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-25066]
[[Page 62463]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
RIN 0596-AC45
Stewardship Contracting, FSH 2409.19, Chapter 60
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of issuance of final directive; response to comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is issuing a final directive to Forest
Service Handbook 2409.19, chapter 60, Stewardship Contracting. The
directive provides direction to implement the provisions as authorized
in the Tribal Forest Protection Act (TFPA) of 2004 (25 U.S.C. 3115a).
On December 26, 2006, the Forest Service published in the Federal
Register for public notice and comments an interim directive regarding
guidance for, TFPA proposals. The agency considered all the comments
and made a number of changes to the final directive in response.
DATES: Final directive 2409.19--60 is effective October 21, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The full text of the final directive is available
electronically on the World Wide Web at https://www.fs.fed.us/im/
directives. The administrative record for this final directive is
available for inspection and copying at the office of the Director,
Office of Tribal Relations, USDA Forest Service, 2nd Floor Central,
Sidney R. Yates Federal Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. Those wishing to inspect the administrative record are
encouraged to call Marsha Butterfield at (202) 205-4095 beforehand to
facilitate access to the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marsha Butterfield, Office of Tribal
Relations, USDA Forest Service, (202) 205-4095.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Forest Service Directive System consists
of the Forest Service Manual (FSM) and the Forest Service Handbook
(FSH), which contain the Agency's policies, practices, and procedures
and serve as the primary basis for the internal management and control
of programs and administrative direction to Forest Service employees.
The directives for all agency programs are set out on the World Wide
Web/Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/im/directives.
The FSM contains legal authorities, objectives, policies,
responsibilities, instructions, and guidance needed on a continuing
basis by Forest Service line officers and primary staff to plan and
execute programs and activities, while the FSH is the principal source
of specialized guidance and instruction for carrying out the policies,
objectives, and responsibilities contained in the FSM.
On December 26, 2006, the Forest Service published an interim
directive in the Federal Register (71 FR 247) for 60-day public notice
and comment. The Forest Service received six letters in response to the
interim directive. Comments received were from Tribes or Tribal
Organizations. A summary of comments received and the agency's
responses follow:
General Comments
The Forest Service appreciates the comments that were provided.
Generally, respondents like and support the policy. Respondents
strongly supported the availability of sole source contracting
authorities and the section giving clear direction that the agency may
provide advice and information to Indian tribes in advance of tribes'
submitting TFPA proposals. Several respondents felt partnerships and
trust obligations seem to be what is missing from the draft policy.
Forest Service Manual 1563.04g (FSM) directs Forest Supervisors to seek
opportunities to develop partnerships with Tribes under all appropriate
Forest Service authorities.
Comment. Several respondents felt the policy was difficult to
figure out without the benefit and context of the surrounding
provisions into which the new provisions are being inserted.
Response. The complete text of chapter 60, FSH 2409.19 was
available for review. The agency did not receive any requests for the
complete text.
Comments on Specific Sections of the TFPA
Section 60.3 Policy. This section adds new direction for
preliminary collaboration and evaluations for a potential Tribal Forest
Protection Act project.
Comment. Respondents strongly supported clear direction that the
Forest Service may provide advice and information to Indian Tribes in
developing TFPA proposals.
Response. The agency is committed to implementation of the TFPA and
providing assistance and advice in potential TFPA proposals.
Section 60.4 Responsibility. This section updates responsibilities
of the Regional Foresters, Forest Supervisors, District Rangers,
Director of Forest Management, and Director of Office of Tribal
Relations.
Comment. Respondents appreciated the policy including agency
consultation with a potential applicant tribe before it develops and
submits its application.
Response. The agency is committed to the implementation of the TFPA
and consultation with Tribes.
Section 60.5 Definitions. This section adds definitions for
Bordering on and Adjacent to, Indian Forest Land and Rangeland, Indian
Tribe, National Forest System Lands, Public Lands, Secretary and Tribal
Community.
Comment. Concerns were expressed regarding the word ``proximity''
used in the definition of ``bordering on or adjacent to.'' There was
concern that it may be too restrictive for appropriate implementation
of the TFPA. Respondents said there must be flexibility in the
definition so that TFPA projects are not rejected based upon narrow
interpretations because of the use of the word ``proximity.'' The word
``proximity'' is not used in the Act.
Response. The definition for bordering on or adjacent to has been
removed from the final directive. Section 60.4 Responsibilities
provides direction on determination of what borders on or is adjacent
to after consultation with the Indian tribe.
Section 61.18 Response to Tribal Requests Made Under the Tribal
Forest Protection Act. This section provides direction for handling
responses to tribal requests made under the Tribal Forest Protection
Act.
Comment. Respondents were concerned that other options available
for implementing TFPA projects, in addition to stewardship contracting,
need to be included along with stewardship contracting. Respondents
requested that ``or other instrument'' be added after ``stewardship
contracting'' throughout the policy. Respondents said stewardship
contracting will most likely not be the only means by which TFPA
projects will be carried out.
Response. The words ``or other instrument'' was added after
``stewardship contracting'' where applicable throughout the policy.
Section 61.7 Notice of Denial Under the Tribal Forest Protection
Act. This section provides direction for notice of denial for projects
submitted under the Tribal Forest Protection Act.
Comment. Respondents requested ``stewardship'' be removed from
Section 61.7--Notice of Denial. Respondents expressed that Tribes enter
into agreements other than just stewardship contracts and agreements.
Response. The word stewardship was removed from the text.
[[Page 62464]]
Comment. Respondents wanted ``pursuant to the TFPA'' added after
``with the FS'' to clarify the point.
Response. ``Pursuant to the TFPA'' was added after ``proposal'' for
clarification.
Section 62.14 Contract Type Under the Tribal Forest Protection Act.
Comment. Respondents strongly supported the availability of sole
source contracting authorities.
Response. Under the Tribal Forest Protection Act of 2004 the Forest
Service has the authority to consider a request made by a tribe to
protect Indian forest or range lands by resource type projects on
adjacent Federal lands. If the proposal holds merit, the Forest Service
may award without further competition as long as the procedures under
this authority are used.
General Response
Developing and sustaining partnerships is a fundamental action
which facilitates the fulfillment of the Federal trust responsibility.
The trust responsibility is a legally enforceable obligation, a duty,
on the part of the U.S. Government to protect the rights of Federally
Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Natives.
The United States Government has a unique legal and governmental
relationship with American Indian tribes as set forth in the U.S.
Constitution, treaties, statutes and Federal court decisions. The
Forest Service shares in the Federal government's overall trust
responsibility to Indian tribes. The primary step in fulfilling agency
responsibilities is for line officers to contact Indian tribal
governments through their elected officials and consult with them on
proposed actions that may have an effect on tribal rights, resources or
general interests.
Regulatory Certifications
Regulatory Impact
This final directive has been reviewed under USDA procedures and
Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review. This final
directive would not have an annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy, nor adversely affect productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, nor State or local Governments.
This final directive would not interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency, nor raise new legal or policy issues.
Finally, this final directive would not alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients of such programs. Accordingly, this final
directive is not subject to OMB review under Executive Order 12866.
Proper Consideration of Small Entities
This final directive has been considered in light of Executive
Order 13272 regarding proper consideration of small entities and the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA),
which amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). It
has been determined that this final directive would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as defined by SBREFA.
Environmental Impact
Section 31.1b of Forest Service Handbook 1909.15 (57 FR 43180;
September 18, 1992) excludes from documentation in an environmental
assessment or impact statement ``rules, regulations, or policies to
establish Servicewide administrative procedures, program processes, or
instructions'' that do not significantly affect the quality of the
human environment. This final directive sets forth administrative
procedures for implementation of the TFPA and, as such, has no direct
effect on Forest Service decisions for land management activities.
No Takings Implications
This final directive is limited to establishment of administrative
procedures to respond to American Indian and Alaska Native proposed
work projects to enter into contracts and/or agreements with the Forest
Service. Projects would conduct land management activities on Forest
Service and BLM lands adjacent to Indian trust land and Indian
communities.
This final directive has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, and it has been determined that the final directive
does not pose the risk of a taking of private property.
Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, requires consultation with State
and local officials when planned regulations and other policies have
substantial direct effects on the States. This final directive
establishes procedures for the TFPA which will be administered by the
Forest Service and implemented by participating Indian tribes.
Therefore, the agency has determined that there are no direct effects
on the States and no further assessment of federalism implications is
necessary.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
In accordance with Forest Service policy and Executive Order 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, formal
consultation was conducted with Indian tribes on development of this
new policy in 2005. The draft TFPA policy was sent to regional FS
offices, where it was then sent to tribes in their respective regions
that have tribal land, rangeland, or tribal communities bordering on or
adjacent to NFS land, for consultation with those tribes. A 60-day
comment period was provided for the consultation and comment.
Energy Effects
This final directive has been reviewed under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. It has been determined that this proposed
guideline does not constitute a significant energy action as defined in
the Executive order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform
Pursuant to Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995,
which the President signed into law on March 22, 1995, the Department
has assessed the effects of this final directive on Tribal governments
and the private sector. This final directive does not compel the
expenditure of $100 million or more by any Tribal government or anyone
in the private sector. Therefore, a statement under section 202 of the
Act is not required.
Civil Justice
This final directive has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. After adoption of this final directive as final,
(1) All State and local laws and regulations that conflict with this
policy or that would impede full implementation of this policy will be
preempted (2) no retroactive effect would be given to this final
directive; and (3) this final directive would not require the use of
administrative proceedings before parties could file suit in court
challenging its provisions.
Conclusion
This final directive implements the provisions of the Tribal Forest
Protection Act which provides a tool for Indian tribes, as defined by
the Act, to propose work and enter into contracts and agreements with
the Forest Service (FS) or Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to restore
land under the
[[Page 62465]]
jurisdiction of either agency, or to reduce threats, including from
fire or disease, on FS or BLM-administered lands adjacent to or
bordering on Indian trust land and Indian communities.
The full text of this handbook is available on the World Wide Web
at https://www.fs.fed.us./im/directives. Single paper copies are
available upon request from the address and telephone numbers listed
earlier in this notice as well as from the nearest regional office, the
location of which are also available on the Washington Office
headquarters homepage on the World Wide Web at https://www.fs.fed.us.
Dated: October 9, 2008.
Charles Myers,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. E8-25066 Filed 10-17-08; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P