Ochoco National Forest, Deschutes National Forest; Invasive Plant Treatment Project, 62461-62462 [E8-24841]
Download as PDF
62461
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 73, No. 204
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Ochoco National Forest, Deschutes
National Forest; Invasive Plant
Treatment Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare a
supplemental environmental impact
statement.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will
prepare a Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SETS) to document
and disclose the potential
environmental effects of proposed
invasive plant treatment activities on
the Deschutes National Forest, Ochoco
National Forest and the Crooked River
National Grassland. An FEIS was made
available in January 2008. A Record of
Decision was signed in January 2008
and subsequently withdrawn. This
project evaluates site-specific treatments
of invasive plants; including manual,
mechanical, cultural, biological and
herbicide treatment methods as well as
the use of prescribed fire. Forest Plan
direction, including amendments
identified in the Pacific Northwest
Region Invasive Plant Program
Environmental Impact Statement, will
be incorporated into all alternatives,
including the Proposed Action.
DATES: A Draft SEIS is expected to be
available in February of 2009, and a
Final SEIS in May 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments
(i.e., letter or fax) to Beth Peer, Invasive
Plant Team Leader, Bend/Ft. Rock
Ranger District, 1230 NE. 3rd, Suite A–
262, Bend, OR 97701. The FAX number
is 541–383–4700. Submit e-mail
comments to: commentspacificnorthwest-deschutes-bendftrock@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth
Peer, Environmental Coordinator and
Invasive Plant Team Leader, Bend/Ft.
Rock Ranger District, 1230 NE. 3rd St.,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
Suite A–262, Bend, Oregon 97701,
phone (541) 383–4769. E-mail
bpeer@fs.fed.us. Maps of proposed
treatment sites and other information
about the project are available on the
Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/r6/
invasiveplant-eis/sitespecific/DES/.
Approximately 52,000 acres of the
total 3 million acres of forests and
grasslands on the Ochoco National
Forest, Deschutes National Forests and
Crooked River National Grassland are
degraded by infestations of invasive,
non-native plants. These infestations
have been identified on approximately
1,900 individual locations or sites.
These infestations have a high potential
to expand and further degrade forests
and grasslands. Infested areas represent
potential seed sources for further
invasion onto neighboring lands.
Invasive plants create a host of
adverse environmental effects which are
harmful to native ecosystem processes.
Examples of these effects include:
Displacement of native plants; reduction
in functionality of habitat and forage for
wildlife and livestock; loss of
threatened, endangered, and sensitive
species; increased soil erosion and
reduced water quality; alteration of
physical and biological properties of
soil, including reduced soil
productivity; changes to the intensity
and frequency of wildfires; budget
impacts that limit or reduce land
management opportunities due to high
costs or dollars spent for controlling
invasive plants; and loss of recreational
opportunities. Without action, invasive
plant populations will continue to grow;
compromising our ability to manage for
healthy functioning ecosystems.
Proposed Action
The USDA Forest Service; Deschutes
National Forest, Ochoco National
Forest, and Crooked River National
Grassland propose to treat areas
currently identified with invasive plant
infestations and to provide timely
treatments for expanded and newly
identified invasive plant sites.
Treatments, depending upon the species
of invasive plants and site
characteristics, would include the use of
prescribed fire; manual, mechanical,
cultural, chemical and biological control
methods. The proposed treatments
would enhance our ability to protect
native ecosystems from invasive, nonnative plants. Some of the infested areas
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
are small in size, while others are
extensive.
Invasive plant treatments are
proposed on approximately 15,000 acres
that are known to be infested by
invasive plants. The Proposed Action
will also analyze treatments for the
likely expansion of these existing sites,
and for new (unidentified) invasive
plant sites in areas most susceptible to
new introductions.
Treatment methods are based upon
information such as the biology of a
particular invasive plant species,
invasive plant site location, site type,
and size of the infestation. Long-term
site goals would be established for
infested areas. Site goals are based upon
treatment options, monitoring and
revegetation potential. Prescriptions are
based upon Integrated Pest Management
principles. Integrated Pest Management
(IPM) is a process by which one selects
and applies a combination of
management techniques (Example:
Prevention then manual or mechanical
treatments, followed by biological
treatments) that, together, control a
particular invasive plant species or
infestation efficiently and effectively.
IPM seeks to combine two or more
management techniques which interact
to provide better control than any one
of the actions might provide alone. It is
typically species-specific, site-specific
and designed to be practical; with
minimum risk to nontarget species or
the surrounding environment, including
wildlife species and human health.
The proposal also includes an Early
Detection/Rapid Response strategy to
timely identify and treat new sites.
Actual annual treatment acres
associated with future sites would likely
vary because of variations in invasive
plant spread and occurrence of new
invasive plant introductions. Actual
annual treatment will likely decline
over the life of this plan because of the
effectiveness of these treatment actions.
Based upon currently known sites
with weed infestations, the Proposed
Action includes approximately 25 acres
of biological control treatment,
approximately 400 acres of herbicide
only treatment, approximately 14,000
acres of herbicide plus one or more of
the following: Manual, biological,
cultural, mechanical, fire.
Scoping
The Forest Service conducted scoping
for this project in 2005. The information
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
62462
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices
was used in development of the DEIS.
CEQ NEPA regulations exclude scoping
from the procedures for supplementing
environmental impact statements (40
CFR 1 502.9(c)(4)).
In addition to inviting public
comments on the DSEIS, the public may
visit Forest Service officials familiar
with this project, at any time during the
analysis and prior to the decision. To
facilitate public participation,
additional opportunities may include
public meetings and/or field trips. Dates
of meetings and field trips are yet to be
determined.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Responsible Official
The responsible officials will be John
Allen, Forest Supervisor, Deschutes
National Forest, 1230 NE. 3rd, Suite A–
262, Bend, OR 97701 and Jeff Walter,
Forest Supervisor, Ochoco National
Forest, 3160 NE. 3rd Street, Prineville,
OR 97754.
Comments
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of the draft EIS must structure
their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful, and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions
(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp.
v. NRDC. 435 U.S. 519. 553 [1978]).
Also, environmental objectives that
could be raised at the draft EIS stage but
that are not raised until after the
completion of the final EIS may be
waived or dismissed by the courts (City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F. 2d 1016,
1022 [9th Cir. 1986] and Wisconsin
Heritage, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334 [E.D.Wis. 1980]). Because of these
court rulings, it is very important that
those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period, so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft EIS should be as
specific as possible. It is also helpful if
the comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits
of alternatives formulated and discussed
in the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provision of the National
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 Oct 20, 2008
Jkt 217001
Environmental Policy Act (40 CFR
1503.3) in addressing these points.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be considered part of the public record
on this proposed action and will be
available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
those who submit anonymous
comments may not have standing to
appeal the subsequent decision under
36 CFR Part 215. Additionally, pursuant
to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may
request the agency to withhold a
submission from the public record by
showing how the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that,
under the FOIA, confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform
the requester of the agency’s decision
regarding the request for confidentiality,
and where the request is denied, the
agency will return the submission and
notify the requester that the comments
may be resubmitted with or without
name and address within a specified
number of days.
Comments on the draft SEIS will be
analyzed, considered, and responded to
by the Forest Service in preparing the
final SEIS. The final SEIS is scheduled
to be completed in May 2006. There will
be two responsible officials for this
multi-Forest SEIS. Duties of the
Responsible Official will be shared
between John Allen, Forest Supervisor
of the Deschutes National Forest, and
Jeff Walter, Forest Supervisor of the
Ochoco National Forest. They will
consider comments, responses, and
environmental consequences discussed
in the final SEIS, and applicable laws,
regulations, and policies in making a
decision regarding this proposed action.
The responsible officials will document
the decision and rationale for the
decision in the Record of Decision. It
will be subject to Forest Service Appeal
Regulations (36 CFR Part 215).
Dated: October 2, 2008.
John Allen,
Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.
Dated: October 14, 2008.
Jeff Walter,
Ochoco National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8–24841 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Meeting; Federal Lands
Recreation Enhancement Act, (Title
VIII, Pub. L. 108–447)
Pacific Northwest Region,
USDA Forest Service.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Pacific Northwest
Recreation Resource Advisory
Committee will meet in Portland, OR.
The purpose of the meeting is to review
and provide recommendations on
recreation fee proposals for facilities
and services offered on lands managed
by the Forest Service and Bureau of
Land Management in Oregon and
Washington, under the Federal Lands
Recreation Enhancement Act of 2004.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
October 30, 2008 from 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m.
and October 31, 2008 from 8:30 a.m.–4
p.m. A public input session will be
provided at 10:30 a.m. on both days of
the meeting. Comments will be limited
to three minutes per person. The
Designated Federal Official has
discretion to not convene the committee
on October 31, 2008, if necessary.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be at the
Residence Inn by Marriott, Lloyd
Center, 1710 NE. Multnomah St.,
Portland, Oregon 97232. Send written
comments to Dan Harkenrider,
Designated Federal Official for the
Pacific Northwest Recreation RAC, 902
Wasco Street, Suite 200, Hood River, OR
97031, 541–308–1700 or
dharkenrider@fs.fed.us.
Dan
Harkenrider, Designated Federal
Official, 902 Wasco Street, Suite 200,
Hood River, OR 97031, 541–308–1700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting is open to the public.
Recreation RAC discussion is limited to
Forest Service and Bureau of Land
Management staff and Recreation RAC
members. However, persons who wish
to bring recreation fee matters to the
attention of the Committee may file
written statements with the Committee
staff before or after the meeting. The
Recreation RAC is authorized by the
Federal Land Recreation Enhancement
Act, which was signed into law by
President Bush in December 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: October 10, 2008.
Calvin N. Joyner,
Acting Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest
Region, USDA Forest Service.
[FR Doc. E8–24810 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM
21OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62461-62462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24841]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 /
Notices
[[Page 62461]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Ochoco National Forest, Deschutes National Forest; Invasive Plant
Treatment Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a supplemental environmental impact
statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement (SETS) to document and disclose the
potential environmental effects of proposed invasive plant treatment
activities on the Deschutes National Forest, Ochoco National Forest and
the Crooked River National Grassland. An FEIS was made available in
January 2008. A Record of Decision was signed in January 2008 and
subsequently withdrawn. This project evaluates site-specific treatments
of invasive plants; including manual, mechanical, cultural, biological
and herbicide treatment methods as well as the use of prescribed fire.
Forest Plan direction, including amendments identified in the Pacific
Northwest Region Invasive Plant Program Environmental Impact Statement,
will be incorporated into all alternatives, including the Proposed
Action.
DATES: A Draft SEIS is expected to be available in February of 2009,
and a Final SEIS in May 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments (i.e., letter or fax) to Beth Peer,
Invasive Plant Team Leader, Bend/Ft. Rock Ranger District, 1230 NE.
3rd, Suite A-262, Bend, OR 97701. The FAX number is 541-383-4700.
Submit e-mail comments to: comments-pacificnorthwest-deschutes-bend-
ftrock@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth Peer, Environmental Coordinator
and Invasive Plant Team Leader, Bend/Ft. Rock Ranger District, 1230 NE.
3rd St., Suite A-262, Bend, Oregon 97701, phone (541) 383-4769. E-mail
bpeer@fs.fed.us. Maps of proposed treatment sites and other information
about the project are available on the Internet at https://
www.fs.fed.us/r6/invasiveplant-eis/sitespecific/DES/.
Approximately 52,000 acres of the total 3 million acres of forests
and grasslands on the Ochoco National Forest, Deschutes National
Forests and Crooked River National Grassland are degraded by
infestations of invasive, non-native plants. These infestations have
been identified on approximately 1,900 individual locations or sites.
These infestations have a high potential to expand and further degrade
forests and grasslands. Infested areas represent potential seed sources
for further invasion onto neighboring lands.
Invasive plants create a host of adverse environmental effects
which are harmful to native ecosystem processes. Examples of these
effects include: Displacement of native plants; reduction in
functionality of habitat and forage for wildlife and livestock; loss of
threatened, endangered, and sensitive species; increased soil erosion
and reduced water quality; alteration of physical and biological
properties of soil, including reduced soil productivity; changes to the
intensity and frequency of wildfires; budget impacts that limit or
reduce land management opportunities due to high costs or dollars spent
for controlling invasive plants; and loss of recreational
opportunities. Without action, invasive plant populations will continue
to grow; compromising our ability to manage for healthy functioning
ecosystems.
Proposed Action
The USDA Forest Service; Deschutes National Forest, Ochoco National
Forest, and Crooked River National Grassland propose to treat areas
currently identified with invasive plant infestations and to provide
timely treatments for expanded and newly identified invasive plant
sites. Treatments, depending upon the species of invasive plants and
site characteristics, would include the use of prescribed fire; manual,
mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control methods. The
proposed treatments would enhance our ability to protect native
ecosystems from invasive, non-native plants. Some of the infested areas
are small in size, while others are extensive.
Invasive plant treatments are proposed on approximately 15,000
acres that are known to be infested by invasive plants. The Proposed
Action will also analyze treatments for the likely expansion of these
existing sites, and for new (unidentified) invasive plant sites in
areas most susceptible to new introductions.
Treatment methods are based upon information such as the biology of
a particular invasive plant species, invasive plant site location, site
type, and size of the infestation. Long-term site goals would be
established for infested areas. Site goals are based upon treatment
options, monitoring and revegetation potential. Prescriptions are based
upon Integrated Pest Management principles. Integrated Pest Management
(IPM) is a process by which one selects and applies a combination of
management techniques (Example: Prevention then manual or mechanical
treatments, followed by biological treatments) that, together, control
a particular invasive plant species or infestation efficiently and
effectively. IPM seeks to combine two or more management techniques
which interact to provide better control than any one of the actions
might provide alone. It is typically species-specific, site-specific
and designed to be practical; with minimum risk to nontarget species or
the surrounding environment, including wildlife species and human
health.
The proposal also includes an Early Detection/Rapid Response
strategy to timely identify and treat new sites. Actual annual
treatment acres associated with future sites would likely vary because
of variations in invasive plant spread and occurrence of new invasive
plant introductions. Actual annual treatment will likely decline over
the life of this plan because of the effectiveness of these treatment
actions.
Based upon currently known sites with weed infestations, the
Proposed Action includes approximately 25 acres of biological control
treatment, approximately 400 acres of herbicide only treatment,
approximately 14,000 acres of herbicide plus one or more of the
following: Manual, biological, cultural, mechanical, fire.
Scoping
The Forest Service conducted scoping for this project in 2005. The
information
[[Page 62462]]
was used in development of the DEIS. CEQ NEPA regulations exclude
scoping from the procedures for supplementing environmental impact
statements (40 CFR 1 502.9(c)(4)).
In addition to inviting public comments on the DSEIS, the public
may visit Forest Service officials familiar with this project, at any
time during the analysis and prior to the decision. To facilitate
public participation, additional opportunities may include public
meetings and/or field trips. Dates of meetings and field trips are yet
to be determined.
Responsible Official
The responsible officials will be John Allen, Forest Supervisor,
Deschutes National Forest, 1230 NE. 3rd, Suite A-262, Bend, OR 97701
and Jeff Walter, Forest Supervisor, Ochoco National Forest, 3160 NE.
3rd Street, Prineville, OR 97754.
Comments
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
the draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful, and alerts an agency
to the reviewer's position and contentions (Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC. 435 U.S. 519. 553 [1978]). Also, environmental
objectives that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not
raised until after the completion of the final EIS may be waived or
dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F. 2d 1016, 1022
[9th Cir. 1986] and Wisconsin Heritage, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334 [E.D.Wis. 1980]). Because of these court rulings, it is very
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by
the close of the 45-day comment period, so that substantive comments
and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when
it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if the comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also
address the adequacy of the draft EIS or the merits of alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provision of the National Environmental Policy Act (40
CFR 1503.3) in addressing these points.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposed action and will be available for public
inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments may not have
standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR Part 215.
Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request the
agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality.
Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under the
FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited
circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service
will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding the
request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the
agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the
comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a
specified number of days.
Comments on the draft SEIS will be analyzed, considered, and
responded to by the Forest Service in preparing the final SEIS. The
final SEIS is scheduled to be completed in May 2006. There will be two
responsible officials for this multi-Forest SEIS. Duties of the
Responsible Official will be shared between John Allen, Forest
Supervisor of the Deschutes National Forest, and Jeff Walter, Forest
Supervisor of the Ochoco National Forest. They will consider comments,
responses, and environmental consequences discussed in the final SEIS,
and applicable laws, regulations, and policies in making a decision
regarding this proposed action. The responsible officials will document
the decision and rationale for the decision in the Record of Decision.
It will be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulations (36 CFR Part
215).
Dated: October 2, 2008.
John Allen,
Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.
Dated: October 14, 2008.
Jeff Walter,
Ochoco National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E8-24841 Filed 10-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M