Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Open DeviceNet Vendor Association, Inc., 62543 [E8-24801]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 21, 2008 / Notices 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, LFV, Norrkoping, SWEDEN has been added as a party to this venture. Also, SRA International, Fairfax, VA has withdrawn as a party to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On November 19, 2004, Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5486). The last notification was filed with the Department on June 13, 2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 21, 2008 (73 FR 42367). Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. E8–24806 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am] Specifically, LinkBASE, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Keyence Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN; RocKontrol Industry Co., Ltd., Shanxi, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Nichigoh Communication Electric Wire Co., Ltd., Osaka, JAPAN; CSE Servelec, Sheffield, UNITED KINGDOM; and Fluke Networks, Inc., Everett, WA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, Spyder Controls Corp., Lacombe, Alberta, CANADA; APV Products Unna, Unna, DENMARK; and The Siemon Company, Watertown, CT have withdrawn as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership. On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 15, 1996 (61 FR 6039). The last notification was filed with the Department on June 4, 2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 16, 2008 (73 FR 40882) Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. E8–24801 Filed 10–20–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BILLING CODE 4410–11–M Antitrust Division DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Open DeviceNet Vendor Association, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on September 5, 2008, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Open DeviceNet Vendor Association, Inc. (‘‘ODVA’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:06 Oct 20, 2008 Jkt 217001 United States v. Regal Cinemas, Incorporated; Response to Public Comments on the Proposed Final Judgment Pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h), the United States hereby publishes the public comments received on the proposed Final Judgment in United States v. Regal Cinemas, Incorporated, Civil Action No. 1:08–cv–746, and the response to the comments. On April 29, 2008, the United States filed a Complaint alleging that Regal Cinema, Inc.’s acquisition of Consolidated Theatres Holdings, GP violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The proposed Final Judgment, filed on April 29, 2008, requires the combined company to divest four movie theaters in three North Carolina metropolitan areas. Public comment was invited PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 62543 within the statutory 60-day comment period. Copies of the Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, Competitive Impact Statement, Public Comments, the United States’ Response to the Comments, and other papers are currently available for inspection in Suite 1010 of the Antitrust Division, Department of Justice, 450 5th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530, telephone: (202) 514–2481, on the Department of Justice’s Web site (https:// www.usdoj.gov/atr), and the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of the District of Columbia, 333 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20001. Copies of any of these materials may be obtained upon request and payment of a copying fee. Patricia A. Brink, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. United States District Court for the District of Columbia [Civil Action No: 1:08–cv–00746] United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Regal Cinemas, Inc., and Consolidated Theatres Holdings, GP, Defendants; Response of the United States to Public Comments on the Proposed Final Judgment Judge: Leon, Richard J. Filed: Pursuant to the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)–(h) (‘‘APPA’’ or ‘‘Tunney Act’’), the United States hereby responds to two public comments received during the public comment period regarding the proposed Final Judgment in this case. One commenter argues for additional, more intrusive relief than the relief obtained by the United States. The other argues there was no harm from the transaction, and that the United States should not have filed its Complaint nor required any relief whatsoever. After careful consideration of the comments, the United States determined that the Proposed Final Judgment remains in the public interest. The United States will move the Court for entry of the proposed Final Judgment after the public comments and this Response have been published in the Federal Register, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 16(d). I. Procedural History On April 29, 2008, the United States filed the Complaint in this matter alleging that defendant Regal Cinema, Inc.’s (‘‘Regal’’) acquisition of defendant Consolidated Theatres Holdings, GP (‘‘Consolidated’’), if permitted to proceed, would combine the two E:\FR\FM\21OCN1.SGM 21OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 21, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 62543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24801]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open DeviceNet Vendor Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 5, 2008, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open DeviceNet Vendor 
Association, Inc. (``ODVA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, LinkBASE, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 
Keyence Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN; RocKontrol Industry Co., Ltd., 
Shanxi, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Nichigoh Communication Electric 
Wire Co., Ltd., Osaka, JAPAN; CSE Servelec, Sheffield, UNITED KINGDOM; 
and Fluke Networks, Inc., Everett, WA have been added as parties to 
this venture.
    Also, Spyder Controls Corp., Lacombe, Alberta, CANADA; APV Products 
Unna, Unna, DENMARK; and The Siemon Company, Watertown, CT have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 
15, 1996 (61 FR 6039).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 4, 
2008. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 16, 2008 (73 FR 40882)

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
 [FR Doc. E8-24801 Filed 10-20-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.