Uncertified Foreign Health-Care Workers, 62197-62198 [E8-24474]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 203 / Monday, October 20, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
7 that established the Board of
Appellate Review (L/BAR) and revising
§ 50.51 to provide for an alternative
method of review of loss of nationality
determinations on a discretionary basis.
The rule was discussed in detail in
Public Notice 6298, as were the
Department’s reasons for making the
changes to the regulations. There were
no comments to the interim final rule
published July 18, 2008. The
Department is now promulgating a final
rule with no changes.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department published this rule as
an interim final rule on July 18, 2008,
with 60 days for post-promulgation
comment, in accordance with the
exemption contained in 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2) for matters relating to agency
management or personnel.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this action is exempt from the
notice and comment procedures
contained in 5 U.S.C. 553, and no other
statute mandates such procedures, no
analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) is
required. However, these changes to the
regulations are hereby certified as not
expected to have a significant impact on
a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, and
Executive Order 13272, section 3(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
year and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of
1996. This rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
import markets.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Oct 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
Executive Order 12866
The Department does not consider
this rule to be a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ within the scope of section
3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866. In
addition, the Department is exempt
from Executive Order 12866 except to
the extent that it is promulgating
regulations in conjunction with a
domestic agency that are significant
regulatory actions. The Department has
nevertheless reviewed the regulation to
ensure its consistency with the
regulatory philosophy and principles set
forth in that Executive Order.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department has reviewed this
regulation in light of sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132—
Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this
rule does not have significant federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Orders No. 12372 and No.
13132.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Department has analyzed this
regulation for the purpose of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 through 4327) and
has determined that it will not have any
effect on the quality of the environment.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects
22 CFR Part 7
Board of Appellate Review.
22 CFR Part 50
Citizenship, Nationality, Loss of
Nationality.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 22 CFR parts 7 and 50
published at 73 FR 41256, July 18, 2008
is adopted as final without change.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
62197
Dated: October 7, 2008.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of
Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–24472 Filed 10–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 40
[Public Notice 6395]
RIN 1400–AB68
Uncertified Foreign Health-Care
Workers
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final
without change the Department’s
interim rule published on December 17,
2002, at 67 FR 77158. The rule changes
the requirements pertaining to the
issuance of visas to certain health care
workers. Certain foreign health care
workers now need to present certificates
establishing competency in a specific
health care field. Certification is issued
by the Commission on Graduates of
Foreign Nursing Schools (CGFNS) or
other credentialing organizations that
have been approved by the Secretary of
Homeland Security (DHS) in
consultation with the Secretary of
Health and Human Services (HHS). This
rule facilitates greater uniformity
between the regulations of DHS and the
Department of State.
DATES: Effective Date: Effective October
20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Penafrancia D. Salas, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services,
Department of State, Washington, DC
20520–0106. Phone: 202–663–1202.
E-mail: (salaspd@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What Is The Background of This Rule?
An alien who seeks to enter the
United States for the purpose of
performing labor as a health care
worker, other than as a physician, is
ineligible for visa issuance and is
inadmissible to the United States unless
the alien presents to the consular officer
a certificate from the CGFNS or a
certificate from an equivalent
independent credentialing organization
approved by DHS in consultation with
HHS that indicates the following:
(a) The alien’s education, training,
license, and experience:
1. Meet all applicable statutory and
regulatory requirements for admission
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
62198
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 203 / Monday, October 20, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
into the United States under the
specified visa;
2. Are comparable with those required
for an American health care worker of
the same type;
3. Are authentic; and,
4. In the case of a license is
unencumbered (not burdened or
affected);
(b) The alien has the level of
competence in oral and written English
considered by the Secretary of HHS, in
consultation with the Secretary of
Education, to be appropriate for the
health care work in which the alien will
be engaged. HHS’s finding is to be based
on an established score on one or more
nationally recognized, commercially
available, standardized assessments;
and,
(c) If a majority of states licensing the
profession in which the alien intends to
work recognize a test predicting an
applicant’s success on the profession’s
licensing or certification examination,
the alien has passed such a test, or has
passed the certification examination.
The Immigration and Nationality Act
section 212(r) created an alternative
certification process for certain aliens
seeking to enter the United States to
perform nursing services. In general,
such procedures apply to those aliens
who already possess a valid,
unrestricted, authentic and
unencumbered license as a nurse in a
state where the alien intends to be
employed and who received their
nursing training in a country where the
quality of education and the English
proficiency of nursing graduates have
been recognized by the CGFNS as
meeting its standards.
On July 25, 2003, the Department of
Homeland Security published in the
Federal Register at 68 FR 43901 its final
rule establishing at 8 CFR 212.15 the
regulations governing the certification
process for aliens seeking to enter to
provide labor as health care providers.
Aliens in covered health care
occupations (with the exception of
aliens who, under 8 CFR 212.15(b) are
not subject to the certification
requirement of 212(a)(5)(C) and 212(r) of
the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(5)(C) and 8
U.S.C. 1182(r) respectively, and the
Department of Homeland Security
Regulations at 8 CFR 212.15) specified
at 8 CFR 212.15(c)) are inadmissible.
dwashington3 on PRODPC61 with RULES
Comments
Were Comments Solicited on This Rule?
Yes, comments were solicited.
Although the Department received four
comments in response to this rule, the
comments raised issues regarding the
hardship on the individual commenters
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 Oct 17, 2008
Jkt 217001
that the statutory requirements imposed.
For example, several comments focused
on the shortage of nurses in the United
States and the need for foreign nurses to
make up the shortage. Other comments
focused on issues relating to the
licensure of nurses.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department’s implementation of
the interim rule was based upon the
‘‘good cause’’ exception found at 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Section 553(b) of the
APA authorizes agencies to dispense
with certain notice procedures for rules
when they are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to public
interest.’’ Nevertheless, the Department
solicited public comments. This rule
makes final an amendment to the
regulation that implemented a
legislative mandate that codified current
practices.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
The Department of State, pursuant to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b), has assessed this regulation and,
by approving it, certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C.
1532, generally requires agencies to
prepare a statement before proposing
any rule that may result in an annual
expenditure of $100 million or more by
State, local, or tribal governments, or by
the private sector. This rule will not
result in any such expenditure, nor will
it significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for purposes of
congressional review of agency
rulemaking under the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104–121. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
import markets.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Review
The Department of State has reviewed
this rule to ensure its consistency with
the regulatory philosophy and
principles set forth in Executive Order
12866 and has determined that the
benefits of the regulation justify its
costs. The Department does not consider
the rule to be an economically
significant action within the scope of
section 3(f)(1) of the Executive Order
since it is not likely to have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or to adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local or tribal governments or
communities.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the rule
have federalism implications warranting
the application of Executive Orders No.
12372 and No. 13132.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
The Department has reviewed the
proposed regulations in light of sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No.
12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 40
Aliens, Nonimmigrants, Immigrants,
Documentation, Passports and Visas.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 22 CFR part 40 published at
67 FR 77158, December 17, 2002 is
adopted as final without change.
■
Dated: October 6, 2008.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8–24474 Filed 10–17–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
E:\FR\FM\20OCR1.SGM
20OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 203 (Monday, October 20, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62197-62198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24474]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 40
[Public Notice 6395]
RIN 1400-AB68
Uncertified Foreign Health-Care Workers
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule adopts as final without change the Department's
interim rule published on December 17, 2002, at 67 FR 77158. The rule
changes the requirements pertaining to the issuance of visas to certain
health care workers. Certain foreign health care workers now need to
present certificates establishing competency in a specific health care
field. Certification is issued by the Commission on Graduates of
Foreign Nursing Schools (CGFNS) or other credentialing organizations
that have been approved by the Secretary of Homeland Security (DHS) in
consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS).
This rule facilitates greater uniformity between the regulations of DHS
and the Department of State.
DATES: Effective Date: Effective October 20, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Penafrancia D. Salas, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services, Department of State, Washington,
DC 20520-0106. Phone: 202-663-1202. E-mail: (salaspd@state.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What Is The Background of This Rule?
An alien who seeks to enter the United States for the purpose of
performing labor as a health care worker, other than as a physician, is
ineligible for visa issuance and is inadmissible to the United States
unless the alien presents to the consular officer a certificate from
the CGFNS or a certificate from an equivalent independent credentialing
organization approved by DHS in consultation with HHS that indicates
the following:
(a) The alien's education, training, license, and experience:
1. Meet all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for
admission
[[Page 62198]]
into the United States under the specified visa;
2. Are comparable with those required for an American health care
worker of the same type;
3. Are authentic; and,
4. In the case of a license is unencumbered (not burdened or
affected);
(b) The alien has the level of competence in oral and written
English considered by the Secretary of HHS, in consultation with the
Secretary of Education, to be appropriate for the health care work in
which the alien will be engaged. HHS's finding is to be based on an
established score on one or more nationally recognized, commercially
available, standardized assessments; and,
(c) If a majority of states licensing the profession in which the
alien intends to work recognize a test predicting an applicant's
success on the profession's licensing or certification examination, the
alien has passed such a test, or has passed the certification
examination.
The Immigration and Nationality Act section 212(r) created an
alternative certification process for certain aliens seeking to enter
the United States to perform nursing services. In general, such
procedures apply to those aliens who already possess a valid,
unrestricted, authentic and unencumbered license as a nurse in a state
where the alien intends to be employed and who received their nursing
training in a country where the quality of education and the English
proficiency of nursing graduates have been recognized by the CGFNS as
meeting its standards.
On July 25, 2003, the Department of Homeland Security published in
the Federal Register at 68 FR 43901 its final rule establishing at 8
CFR 212.15 the regulations governing the certification process for
aliens seeking to enter to provide labor as health care providers.
Aliens in covered health care occupations (with the exception of aliens
who, under 8 CFR 212.15(b) are not subject to the certification
requirement of 212(a)(5)(C) and 212(r) of the INA (8 U.S.C.
1182(a)(5)(C) and 8 U.S.C. 1182(r) respectively, and the Department of
Homeland Security Regulations at 8 CFR 212.15) specified at 8 CFR
212.15(c)) are inadmissible.
Comments
Were Comments Solicited on This Rule?
Yes, comments were solicited. Although the Department received four
comments in response to this rule, the comments raised issues regarding
the hardship on the individual commenters that the statutory
requirements imposed. For example, several comments focused on the
shortage of nurses in the United States and the need for foreign nurses
to make up the shortage. Other comments focused on issues relating to
the licensure of nurses.
Regulatory Findings
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department's implementation of the interim rule was based upon
the ``good cause'' exception found at 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Section
553(b) of the APA authorizes agencies to dispense with certain notice
procedures for rules when they are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to public interest.'' Nevertheless, the Department solicited
public comments. This rule makes final an amendment to the regulation
that implemented a legislative mandate that codified current practices.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
The Department of State, pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 605(b), has assessed this regulation and, by approving it,
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UFMA),
Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally requires
agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that may
result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This rule will
not result in any such expenditure, nor will it significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804, for
purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking under the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-
121. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
import markets.
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Review
The Department of State has reviewed this rule to ensure its
consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in
Executive Order 12866 and has determined that the benefits of the
regulation justify its costs. The Department does not consider the rule
to be an economically significant action within the scope of section
3(f)(1) of the Executive Order since it is not likely to have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or to adversely affect in
a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal
governments or communities.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Nor will the rule have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders No. 12372
and No. 13132.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department has reviewed the proposed regulations in light of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and
reduce burden.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 40
Aliens, Nonimmigrants, Immigrants, Documentation, Passports and
Visas.
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 22 CFR part 40 published at 67
FR 77158, December 17, 2002 is adopted as final without change.
Dated: October 6, 2008.
Janice L. Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs Department of State.
[FR Doc. E8-24474 Filed 10-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P