Indexed Annuities and Certain Other Insurance Contracts, 61753-61754 [E8-24625]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Proposed Rules
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section
40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace.
Under that section, the FAA is charged
with prescribing regulations to ensure
the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace. This regulation is
within the scope of that authority
because it proposes to remove Class E
airspace at the Metlakatla Airport, AK,
and represents the FAA’s continuing
effort to safely and efficiently use the
navigable airspace.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9R, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed August 15, 2007, and effective
September 15, 2007, is to be amended
as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending
Upward From 700 Feet or More Above the
Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
AAL AK E5
*
*
*
*
Metlakatla, AK [Revoked]
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
17:14 Oct 16, 2008
Jkt 217001
Issued in Anchorage, AK, on October 6,
2008.
Anthony M. Wylie,
Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information
Area Group.
[FR Doc. E8–24689 Filed 10–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 230 and 240
[Release Nos. 33–8976, 34–58769; File No.
S7–14–08]
RIN 3235–AK16
Indexed Annuities and Certain Other
Insurance Contracts
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange
Commission is reopening the period for
public comment on new rules that it
originally proposed in Securities Act
Release No. 8933 (June 25, 2008) [73 FR
37752 (July 1, 2008)]. The Commission
proposed a rule that would, if adopted,
define the terms ‘‘annuity contract’’ and
‘‘optional annuity contract’’ under the
Securities Act of 1933. The proposed
rule is intended to clarify the status
under the federal securities laws of
indexed annuities. The Commission
also proposed to exempt insurance
companies from filing reports under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with
respect to indexed annuities and other
securities that are registered under the
Securities Act, provided that the
securities are regulated under state
insurance law, the issuing insurance
company and its financial condition are
subject to supervision and examination
by a state insurance regulator, and the
securities are not publicly traded.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before November 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/proposed.shtml);
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. S7–14–08 on the subject line; or
• Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal
(https://www.regulations.gov). Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
61753
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Florence E. Harmon, Acting
Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
S7–14–08. This file number should be
included on the subject line if e-mail is
used. To help us process and review
your comments more efficiently, please
use only one method. The Commission
will post all comments on the
Commission’s Internet Web site (https://
www.sec.gov). Comments are also
available for public inspection and
copying in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. All comments received
will be posted without change; we do
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keith E. Carpenter, Senior Special
Counsel, Office of Disclosure and
Insurance Product Regulation, Division
of Investment Management, at (202)
551–6795, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–5720.
The
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is reopening the period
for public comment on a proposed rule
that would define the terms ‘‘annuity
contract’’ and ‘‘optional annuity
contract’’ under the Securities Act of
1933. The proposed rule is intended to
clarify the status under the federal
securities laws of indexed annuities,
under which payments to the purchaser
are dependent on the performance of a
securities index. The Commission is
also reopening the period for public
comment on a proposed rule that
would, if adopted, exempt insurance
companies from filing reports under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with
respect to indexed annuities and other
securities that are registered under the
Securities Act, provided that the
securities are regulated under state
insurance law, the issuing insurance
company and its financial condition are
subject to supervision and examination
by a state insurance regulator, and the
securities are not publicly traded. The
rules were proposed on June 25, 2008,1
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 Indexed Annuities and Certain Other Insurance
Contracts, Securities Act Release No. 8933 (June 25,
2008) [73 FR 37752 (July 1, 2008)].
E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM
17OCP1
61754
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 202 / Friday, October 17, 2008 / Proposed Rules
and the comment period initially closed
on September 10, 2008.
The Commission has received
numerous letters, including from state
insurance commissioners, members of
Congress, and others, requesting that the
comment period be extended.2 In
general, these commenters indicated
that an extension would help them
analyze the proposal and prepare
meaningful comments. In order to
provide additional time for the public to
thoroughly consider the proposal, and
in view of the significant continuing
public interest in the proposal, the
Commission believes that it is
appropriate to reopen the comment
period. Accordingly, we will reopen the
comment period for an additional 30
days.
By the Commission.
Dated: October 10, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8–24625 Filed 10–16–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 30
[Docket No. FR–5081–P–01]
RIN 2501–AD23
Civil Money Penalties: Certain
Prohibited Conduct
AGENCY:
Office of General Counsel,
HUD.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This rule would revise HUD’s
regulations that govern the imposition
of civil money penalties. Specifically,
the rule would revise the definition of
‘‘material or materially’’ and add a
definition of ‘‘ability to pay,’’ which is
one factor used in determining the
appropriateness of the amount of any
civil money penalty. Additionally, the
proposed rule would require
respondents, in their responses to the
prepenalty notice, to specifically
address the factors used in determining
the appropriateness and amount of civil
money penalty. This rule would also
allow Government Counsel to file
complaints on behalf of the Mortgagee
Review Board and departmental
officials. Finally, this rule would make
other minor clarifying changes.
DATES: Comment Due Date: December
16, 2008.
2 Comments on the proposal are available at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-14-08/
s71408.shtml.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:14 Oct 16, 2008
Jkt 217001
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this rule to the Regulations Division,
Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 7th Street, SW., Room 10276,
Washington, DC 20410–0500. Interested
persons also may submit comments
electronically through The Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. HUD strongly
encourages commenters to submit
comments electronically in order to
make them immediately available to the
public. Commenters should follow the
instructions provided on that site to
submit comments electronically.
Facsimile (FAX) comments are not
acceptable. In all cases, communications
must refer to the docket number and
title. All comments and
communications submitted to HUD will
be available for public inspection and
copying between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.
weekdays at the above address. Due to
security measures at the HUD
Headquarters building, an advance
appointment to review the public
comments must be scheduled by calling
the Regulations Division at 202–708–
3055 (this is not a toll-free number).
Copies of all comments submitted are
available for inspection and
downloading at www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dane Narode, Acting Associate General
Counsel for Program Enforcement,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 1250 Maryland Avenue,
SW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20024–
0500; telephone number 202–708–2350
(this is not a toll-free number), or e-mail
address Dane.M.Narode@hud.gov.
Hearing- or speech-impaired individuals
may access the telephone number listed
above by calling the toll-free Federal
Information Relay Service at 800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Proposed Rule
HUD’s civil money penalties
regulations are located in 24 CFR part
30. In general, 24 CFR part 30 outlines
the procedures and requirements that
concern violations, prepenalty notices,
and complaints. This proposed rule
would make several revisions in 24 CFR
part 30.
First, ‘‘ability to pay’’ is one of the
factors used in determining the
appropriateness of civil money penalties
under § 30.80(c). To provide more
clarity with respect to this factor, HUD
proposes to define ‘‘ability to pay’’ in
§ 30.10. As defined, ‘‘ability to pay’’
would be determined based on the
respondent’s resources available
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
presently and prospectively, from which
the Department could ultimately recover
the total award. The definition would
also allow for the consideration of
respondent’s resources to be based on
historical evidence. This would include
an analysis of the resources available to
the respondent from which the
respondent could pay the judgment in
one lump sum, over time, or at some
point in the future. This analysis would
also examine the resources from which
the Department could obtain enforced
collection or administrative offset. A
second modification would revise the
definition of ‘‘Material’’ or ‘‘Materially’’
to mean anything having the natural
tendency or potential to influence, or,
considering the totality of the
circumstances, in some significant
respect or to some significant degree. To
rise to the level of material, acts or
conduct would not be required to
actually influence a decision or course
of action by the Department, but merely
to have the potential to do so. Therefore,
this revised definition would not
require ‘‘but for’’ or actual causation for
an act or conduct to be material.
Moreover, after revision, the definition
of material would no longer require
consideration of any factor listed in
§ 30.80, which are generally to be used
only to determine the amount of the
civil money penalty imposed, if any, but
would permit the Department to
introduce evidence of the relevant
factors to establish the significance of a
violation in light of the totality of the
circumstances.
Additionally, this proposed rule
would revise § 30.35, the section that
lists the actions authorized against a
mortgagee or lender. Currently,
§ 30.35(a)(14) includes failure to comply
with ‘‘the terms of a settlement
agreement with HUD’’ among the list of
actions for which the Mortgagee Review
Board may initiate a civil money
penalty action. The proposed revision
would delete this provision as a basis
upon which HUD may initiate a civil
money penalty action against a
mortgagee or lender.
HUD is seeking to clarify some
apparent ambiguity in §§ 30.45 and
30.68. First, this proposed rule would
revise § 30.45(d) to clarify that the
violation of programmatic procedures
and standards are indicators of
unsatisfactory management. In addition,
this proposed rule would modify
§ 30.68(b) to clarify that any violation of
a housing assistance payments contract
may result in the imposition of a civil
money penalty. HUD has learned that
some confusion exists about whether
the violations in § 30.68(b)(1) and (b)(2)
are exhaustive. The proposed rule
E:\FR\FM\17OCP1.SGM
17OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 202 (Friday, October 17, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61753-61754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24625]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 230 and 240
[Release Nos. 33-8976, 34-58769; File No. S7-14-08]
RIN 3235-AK16
Indexed Annuities and Certain Other Insurance Contracts
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission is reopening the period
for public comment on new rules that it originally proposed in
Securities Act Release No. 8933 (June 25, 2008) [73 FR 37752 (July 1,
2008)]. The Commission proposed a rule that would, if adopted, define
the terms ``annuity contract'' and ``optional annuity contract'' under
the Securities Act of 1933. The proposed rule is intended to clarify
the status under the federal securities laws of indexed annuities. The
Commission also proposed to exempt insurance companies from filing
reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to
indexed annuities and other securities that are registered under the
Securities Act, provided that the securities are regulated under state
insurance law, the issuing insurance company and its financial
condition are subject to supervision and examination by a state
insurance regulator, and the securities are not publicly traded.
DATES: Comments should be received on or before November 17, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/proposed.shtml);
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. S7-14-08 on the subject line; or
Use the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://
www.regulations.gov). Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File No. S7-14-08. This file number
should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help us
process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one
method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov). Comments are also available for
public inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. All comments received will
be posted without change; we do not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith E. Carpenter, Senior Special
Counsel, Office of Disclosure and Insurance Product Regulation,
Division of Investment Management, at (202) 551-6795, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-5720.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') is reopening the period for public comment on a
proposed rule that would define the terms ``annuity contract'' and
``optional annuity contract'' under the Securities Act of 1933. The
proposed rule is intended to clarify the status under the federal
securities laws of indexed annuities, under which payments to the
purchaser are dependent on the performance of a securities index. The
Commission is also reopening the period for public comment on a
proposed rule that would, if adopted, exempt insurance companies from
filing reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect
to indexed annuities and other securities that are registered under the
Securities Act, provided that the securities are regulated under state
insurance law, the issuing insurance company and its financial
condition are subject to supervision and examination by a state
insurance regulator, and the securities are not publicly traded. The
rules were proposed on June 25, 2008,\1\
[[Page 61754]]
and the comment period initially closed on September 10, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Indexed Annuities and Certain Other Insurance Contracts,
Securities Act Release No. 8933 (June 25, 2008) [73 FR 37752 (July
1, 2008)].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission has received numerous letters, including from state
insurance commissioners, members of Congress, and others, requesting
that the comment period be extended.\2\ In general, these commenters
indicated that an extension would help them analyze the proposal and
prepare meaningful comments. In order to provide additional time for
the public to thoroughly consider the proposal, and in view of the
significant continuing public interest in the proposal, the Commission
believes that it is appropriate to reopen the comment period.
Accordingly, we will reopen the comment period for an additional 30
days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Comments on the proposal are available at https://
www.sec.gov/comments/s7-14-08/s71408.shtml.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the Commission.
Dated: October 10, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-24625 Filed 10-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P