Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report, 60711-60713 [E8-24195]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–ES–2008–N0131; 41545–1261–
0000–D2]
Interagency Florida Panther Response
Plan
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability:
environmental assessment and finding
of no significant impact for the
Interagency Florida Panther Response
Plan.
AGENCY:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service, announce our decision and the
availability of the Final Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for our
Interagency Florida Panther Response
Plan. Our EA considers alternatives for
managing conflicts between humans
and the endangered Florida panther
(Puma concolor coryi), in accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the EA and
FONSI may be obtained by writing to:
Layne Hamilton, Refuge Manager,
Florida Panther and Ten Thousand
Islands National Wildlife Refuges, 3860
Tollgate Boulevard, Suite 300, Naples,
FL 34114, or Elizabeth Souheaver, Area
II Supervisor, Southeast Regional Office,
Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century
Boulevard, Suite 420, Atlanta, GA
30345. The EA and/or FONSI may also
be accessed and downloaded from the
Service’s Internet Web site: https://
www.fws.gov/verobeach/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Layne Hamilton, at address in
ADDRESSES, or at 239–353–8442,
extension 227 (telephone), or Ms.
Elizabeth Souheaver, Area II Supervisor,
at address in ADDRESSES, or at 404–679–
7163 (telephone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this
notice, we announce our decision and
availability of the final EA and FONSI
for the Interagency Florida Panther
Response Plan in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act’s
(NEPA’s) implementing regulations at
40 CFR 1506.6 (b). We released a draft
of the plan to the public as a Draft EA
for ‘‘Guidelines for Living with Florida
Panther and the Interagency Florida
Panther Response Plan,’’ and requested
comments in a notice in the Federal
Register on May 25, 2006 (71 FR 30156).
To improve the quality and credibility
of the scientific information, we also
conducted a formal peer review process
for the draft plan. Responses to public,
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
tribal, and peer review comments were
included in the Revised EA appendices.
On November 2, 2007, we released the
Revised EA and the Interagency Florida
Panther Response Plan to the public,
requesting comments via a Federal
Register notice (72 FR 62256). We have
included responses to specific
comments in the Final EA appendices.
We have coordinated this proposal with
the National Park Service, the Florida
Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission, and local Indian tribes.
The Draft, Revised, and Final EAs
identified and evaluated three
alternatives for managing the conflicts
between humans and the endangered
Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi).
Alternative A (Preferred Action)
manages human-panther interactions
with an interagency response team and
an established plan that prioritizes
public safety and evaluates each
situation by analyzing panther behavior
and human activity. Alternative B (No
Action) does not utilize an interagency
team or a response plan, but responds
to human-panther interactions on a
case-by-case basis without established
protocols or guidelines. Alternative C
includes a response team and a plan
that differs from Alternative A by
providing rigid protocols based on
frequency of panther sightings and
proximity to human-occupied
structures, without considering panther
behavior or influences of human activity
on panther behavior. The EA consists of
a thorough analysis of the
environmental, social, economic, and
cultural resource considerations for
each alternative.
The FONSI documents the selection
of Alternative A. This alternative was
selected over the other alternatives
because it utilizes the best available
science in a consistent manner to
manage human-panther interactions.
Under this alternative, the Response
Team’s responsibility is to review
information related to human-panther
interactions, classify these situations
based on the documented behavior of
the panther, provide an action plan to
the responsible agencies, and take
approved and appropriate actions. The
plan provides the responding officials
with the flexibility to address
emergency situations swiftly. Also,
public outreach and education are an
important element of this proposal,
recognizing the importance of teaching
people how to safely live and recreate
in panther habitat. There are no
conflicts with local, State, regional, or
Federal plans or policies.
Authority: We provide this notice under
NEPA regulations at 40 CFR 1506.6.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60711
Dated: October 6, 2008.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Deputy Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. E8–24256 Filed 10–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R9–FHC–2008–N0219;13410–1124–
0000 L5]
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock
Assessment Report
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of final
revised marine mammal stock
assessment report for the northern sea
otter stock in Washington State;
response to comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA), the Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) has incorporated public
comments into a revision of the marine
mammal stock assessment report for the
northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris
kenyoni) stock in Washington State. The
2008 final stock assessment report is
now complete and available to the
public.
ADDRESSES: Send requests for printed
copies of the final stock assessment
report to: Manager, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Western Washington
Fish and Wildlife Office, 510 Desmond
Drive SE, Suite 102, Lacey, WA 98503;
(360) 753–9440. Copies of the final
revised stock assessment report are also
available on the Internet in Adobe
Acrobat format at https://www.fws.gov/
westwafwo.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: One of the
goals of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361–
1407) is to ensure that stocks of marine
mammals occurring in waters under the
jurisdiction of the United States do not
experience a level of human-caused
mortality and serious injury that is
likely to cause the stock to be reduced
below its optimum sustainable
population level (OSP). OSP is defined
as ‘‘* * * the number of animals which
will result in the maximum productivity
of the population or the species, keeping
in mind the carrying capacity of the
habitat and the health of the ecosystem
of which they form a constituent
element.’’
To help accomplish the goal of
maintaining marine mammal stocks at
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA
requires the Service and the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
60712
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Notices
prepare stock assessment reports for
each marine mammal stock that occurs
in waters under the jurisdiction of the
United States. These stock assessments
are to be based on the best scientific
information available and are, therefore,
prepared in consultation with
established regional scientific review
groups. Each stock assessment must
include: (1) A description of the stock
and its geographic range; (2) minimum
population estimate, maximum net
productivity rate, and current
population trend; (3) estimate of humancaused mortality and serious injury; (4)
commercial fishery interactions; (5)
status of the stock; and (6) potential
biological removal level (PBR). The PBR
is defined as ‘‘* * * the maximum
number of animals, not including
natural mortalities, that may be removed
from a marine mammal stock while
allowing that stock to reach or maintain
its OSP.’’ The PBR is the product of the
minimum population estimate of the
stock (Nmin); one-half the maximum
theoretical or estimated net productivity
rate of the stock at a small population
size (Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of
between 0.1 and 1.0, which is intended
to compensate for uncertainty and
unknown estimation errors.
Section 117 of the MMPA also
requires the Service and the NMFS to
review and revise the stock assessment
reports: (A) At least annually for stocks
that are specified as strategic stocks; (B)
at least annually for stocks for which
significant new information is available;
and (C) at least once every 3 years for
all other stocks.
A strategic stock is defined in the
MMPA as a marine mammal stock: (A)
For which the level of direct humancaused mortality exceeds the PBR; (B)
which, based on the best available
scientific information, is declining and
is likely to be listed as a threatened
species under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973 (ESA) within the foreseeable
future; or (C) which is listed as a
threatened or endangered species under
the ESA, or is designated as depleted
under the MMPA.
A draft revised stock assessment
report for the northern sea otter stock in
Washington State was made available
for a 90-day public review and comment
period on April 17, 2008 (73 FR 20931).
Prior to releasing it for public review
and comment, the Service subjected the
draft report to internal technical review
and to scientific review by the Pacific
Regional Scientific Review Group
established under the MMPA. Following
the close of the comment period, the
Service revised the stock assessment
and prepared the final 2008 stock
assessment report.
We revised the final stock assessment
report based on public comments
received (see below). The status of the
stock remains unchanged from the draft
revised SAR that was provided for
public comment; however, the PBR
level was amended to reflect the results
of the 2007 survey conducted by the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife. We also provided further
clarification in the discussion of
fisheries information as it relates to
reports of incidental take. Most of the
public comments received were
addressed by adding new text for
clarity.
A summary of the final revised stock
assessment report is presented in Table
1. The table lists the stock’s Nmin, Rmax,
Fr, PBR, annual estimated humancaused mortality and serious injury, and
status.
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF FINAL REVISED STOCK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE NORTHERN SEA OTTER STOCK IN
WASHINGTON STATE
Stock
Nmin
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Northern sea otters (Washington State)
1,125
Comments and Responses
The Service received comments from
2 entities on the draft stock assessment
report. The issues raised in those
comments and our responses are
provided below.
Comment 1: The Service should
clarify that the next revision on this
assessment will be prepared within 3
years or sooner, if the Washington stock
expands its range into Oregon or British
Columbia, or undergoes any significant
change in the status of the stock.
Response: The Service will continue
to review available information on an
annual basis and revise the stock
assessment report at least once every 3
years for the northern sea otter in
Washington State, as specified under
section 117 of the MMPA. Section
117(c) directs the Service to review a
stock assessment if significant new
information indicates that the status of
the stock has changed, which could
occur prior to the end of the next 3
years. If the Service obtains new
information that indicates this stock has
established a range significantly beyond
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
Rmax
0.20
Fr
Annual estimated average humancaused mortality
PBR
0.1
11
Unknown ...............................................
the current range, or has undergone
some other significant change, the
Service will review the stock assessment
report and revise as appropriate at that
time.
Comment 2: The Nmin, PBR, and
Figure 2 should be amended to reflect
the results of the 2007 survey conducted
by the Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife and appropriate references
to the unpublished reports, both 2006
and 2007, should be provided.
Response: The Service agrees with
this comment and has updated the stock
assessment report to reflect the 2007
survey data. The 2007 survey data
identifies an Nmin of 1,125 and,
therefore, the re-calculated PBR is 11
animals. The citations have also been
updated to indicate that information on
the 2006 and 2007 unpublished survey
data may be obtained by contacting the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife.
Comment 3: In the discussion under
Fisheries Information, clarify the
location of Fishery Areas 4 and 4A and
when this fishery was last active. In
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Stock status
Non-Strategic
reference to Observer Coverage in these
fisheries, listed in Table 1, provide
further clarification as to what is meant
by ‘‘1–11 net days observed.’’
Response: The location of Fishery
Areas 4 and 4A has been clarified. The
information supplied to us by the
Makah Tribe and the NMFS regarding
the Makah Northern Washington Marine
Set-gillnet Fishery was not broken out
by Fishery Area; therefore, we can not
provide further fishing effort beyond the
activity level already included in Table
1 in the stock assessment report. The
observer coverage information provided
in Table 1 in the stock assessment report
is in the format provided by the sources.
Further clarification is not available to
us for inclusion in the stock assessment
report.
Comment 4: Clarify whether the
NMFS, who collects data through a selfreporting system on the incidental take
of marine mammals in fisheries, has
received reports of sea otters taken in
treaty and non-treaty fisheries in
Washington State or has simply not
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Notices
provided the reports to the Service.
Specify the corresponding time frame.
Response: The Service has updated
the stock assessment report to reflect the
requested changes. However, the
information provided by the NMFS did
not include a time frame; therefore, a
time frame has not been included in the
updated stock assessment report.
Comment 5: Given the apparent lack
of voluntary reports of sea otter takes
and the unreliability of voluntary
reporting schemes in general, remove
the word ‘‘more’’ from the sentence on
page 5 that states ‘‘* * * the
information provided by the NMFS is
not sufficient to provide a more accurate
estimate of annual mortality * * *.’’
Further, a statement should be made
that a useful estimate of fishing
mortality will require instituting
observer coverage to obtain data on
fishery efforts.
Response: We have revised the final
stock assessment report to reflect this
comment. The fishery observer
programs are conducted by the NMFS of
the Department of Commerce, and,
therefore, institution of observer
coverage in fisheries must be directed to
them. We have forwarded this
suggestion to them (see response to
comment 6).
Comment 6: The stock assessment
report concludes that available
information is not adequate to make a
reliable assessment of incidental take
levels. Therefore, the Service should
consult with NMFS, Tribal authorities,
and other relevant groups to arrange for
the placement of observers aboard trap
and gillnet fishing vessels that may
incidentally take sea otters.
Response: The fishery observer
programs are under the administration
of the NMFS in accordance with section
118 of the MMPA. With the exception
of the Puget Sound Region salmon drift
gillnet, all commercial fisheries in the
State of Washington that have the
potential to take sea otters are classified
as Category III in NMFS’ List of
Fisheries. Category III fisheries are not
required to accommodate observers.
Further, under this program, fishery
interactions are self-reporting or, in
some cases, identified as excluded, e.g.,
treaty Tribal fishing. It is the position of
the Service that the incidental take of
sea otters by treaty Tribal fishing
activities must be authorized under the
MMPA. Nonetheless, obtaining
incidental take information is a
challenge. However, the Service will
continue to work with the NMFS, Tribal
authorities, and others to the extent
practicable under these conditions to
obtain better data.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
Comment 7: Illegal taking of sea otters
is being perpetrated by ‘‘fish profiteers’’
and the Service is not taking appropriate
action.
Response: The stock assessment
report presents all of the human-caused
mortality of sea otters that has been
made known to the Service.
Reference Not Cited in the Notice of
Availability of Draft Revised SAR:
Jameson, R.J. and S. Jeffries. 2008.
Results of the 2007 Survey of the
Reintroduced Sea Otter Population in
Washington State. Unpublished Report.
7pp. Copies may be obtained from the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife.
Authority: The authority for this action is
the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361–1407).
Dated: October 2, 2008.
Kenneth Stansell,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8–24195 Filed 10–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
60713
at (703) 358–2018, or by e-mail at
Joe_Starinchak@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C.
App.), this notice announces meetings
of the ANS Task Force. The ANS Task
Force was established by the
Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance
Prevention and Control Act of 1990.
Topics the ANS Task Force plans to
cover during the meeting include:
Regional Panel issues and
recommendations, Committee
recommendations, and consideration for
approval of state ANS management
plans. The agenda and other related
meeting information are on the ANS
Task Force Web site at: https://
anstaskforce.gov/meetings.php.
Dated: September 22, 2008.
Gary Frazer,
Co-Chair, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task
Force, Assistant Director—Fisheries & Habitat
Conservation.
[FR Doc. E8–24228 Filed 10–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[FWS–R9–FHC–2008–N0265; 94240–1341–
0000–N3–N5]
Bureau of Land Management
Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force
Meeting
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance
Species (ANS) Task Force. The meeting
is open to the public. The meeting
topics are identified in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
DATES: The ANS Task Force will meet
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday,
October 28, and Wednesday, October
29, 2008.
ADDRESSES: The ANS Task Force
meeting will take place at the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Room 200, 4401
North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA
22203; (703) 358–1843. You may inspect
minutes of the meeting at the office of
the Chief, Division of Fish and Wildlife
Management and Habitat Restoration,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401
North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA
22203, during regular business hours,
Monday through Friday. You may also
view the minutes on the ANS Task
Force Web site at: https://
anstaskforce.gov/meetings.php.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Starinchak, Branch of Invasive Species,
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[F–14876–M, F–14876–N; AK–964–1410–
KC–P]
Alaska Native Claims Selection
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of decision approving
lands for conveyance.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR
2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an
appealable decision approving lands for
conveyance pursuant to the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act will be
issued to NANA Regional Corporation,
Inc., Successor in Interest to Kivalina
Sinuakmeut Corporation. The lands are
in the vicinity of Kivalina, Alaska, and
are located in:
Kateel River Meridian, Alaska
T. 29 N., R. 24 W.,
Secs. 3 to 10, inclusive;
Secs. 13 to 23, inclusive;
Secs. 28 to 33, inclusive.
Containing approximately 14,663 acres.
The subsurface estate in these lands
will be conveyed to NANA Regional
Corporation, Inc. when the surface
estate is conveyed to NANA Regional
Corporation, Inc., Successor in Interest
to Kivalina Sinuakmeut Corporation.
Notice of the decision will also be
published four times in the Arctic
Sounder.
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60711-60713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24195]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R9-FHC-2008-N0219;13410-1124-0000 L5]
Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of final revised marine mammal stock
assessment report for the northern sea otter stock in Washington State;
response to comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA),
the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has incorporated public
comments into a revision of the marine mammal stock assessment report
for the northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) stock in Washington
State. The 2008 final stock assessment report is now complete and
available to the public.
ADDRESSES: Send requests for printed copies of the final stock
assessment report to: Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102,
Lacey, WA 98503; (360) 753-9440. Copies of the final revised stock
assessment report are also available on the Internet in Adobe Acrobat
format at https://www.fws.gov/westwafwo.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: One of the goals of the MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1361-1407) is to ensure that stocks of marine mammals occurring in
waters under the jurisdiction of the United States do not experience a
level of human-caused mortality and serious injury that is likely to
cause the stock to be reduced below its optimum sustainable population
level (OSP). OSP is defined as ``* * * the number of animals which will
result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species,
keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of
the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.''
To help accomplish the goal of maintaining marine mammal stocks at
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA requires the Service and the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to
[[Page 60712]]
prepare stock assessment reports for each marine mammal stock that
occurs in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States. These
stock assessments are to be based on the best scientific information
available and are, therefore, prepared in consultation with established
regional scientific review groups. Each stock assessment must include:
(1) A description of the stock and its geographic range; (2) minimum
population estimate, maximum net productivity rate, and current
population trend; (3) estimate of human-caused mortality and serious
injury; (4) commercial fishery interactions; (5) status of the stock;
and (6) potential biological removal level (PBR). The PBR is defined as
``* * * the maximum number of animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal stock while
allowing that stock to reach or maintain its OSP.'' The PBR is the
product of the minimum population estimate of the stock
(Nmin); one-half the maximum theoretical or estimated net
productivity rate of the stock at a small population size
(Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of between 0.1
and 1.0, which is intended to compensate for uncertainty and unknown
estimation errors.
Section 117 of the MMPA also requires the Service and the NMFS to
review and revise the stock assessment reports: (A) At least annually
for stocks that are specified as strategic stocks; (B) at least
annually for stocks for which significant new information is available;
and (C) at least once every 3 years for all other stocks.
A strategic stock is defined in the MMPA as a marine mammal stock:
(A) For which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds the
PBR; (B) which, based on the best available scientific information, is
declining and is likely to be listed as a threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) within the foreseeable future; or
(C) which is listed as a threatened or endangered species under the
ESA, or is designated as depleted under the MMPA.
A draft revised stock assessment report for the northern sea otter
stock in Washington State was made available for a 90-day public review
and comment period on April 17, 2008 (73 FR 20931). Prior to releasing
it for public review and comment, the Service subjected the draft
report to internal technical review and to scientific review by the
Pacific Regional Scientific Review Group established under the MMPA.
Following the close of the comment period, the Service revised the
stock assessment and prepared the final 2008 stock assessment report.
We revised the final stock assessment report based on public
comments received (see below). The status of the stock remains
unchanged from the draft revised SAR that was provided for public
comment; however, the PBR level was amended to reflect the results of
the 2007 survey conducted by the Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife. We also provided further clarification in the discussion of
fisheries information as it relates to reports of incidental take. Most
of the public comments received were addressed by adding new text for
clarity.
A summary of the final revised stock assessment report is presented
in Table 1. The table lists the stock's Nmin,
Rmax, Fr, PBR, annual estimated human-caused
mortality and serious injury, and status.
Table 1--Summary of Final Revised Stock Assessment Report for the Northern Sea Otter Stock in Washington State
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual estimated
Stock Nmin Rmax Fr PBR average human-caused Stock status
mortality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northern sea otters 1,125 0.20 0.1 11 Unknown............. Non-Strategic
(Washington State).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments and Responses
The Service received comments from 2 entities on the draft stock
assessment report. The issues raised in those comments and our
responses are provided below.
Comment 1: The Service should clarify that the next revision on
this assessment will be prepared within 3 years or sooner, if the
Washington stock expands its range into Oregon or British Columbia, or
undergoes any significant change in the status of the stock.
Response: The Service will continue to review available information
on an annual basis and revise the stock assessment report at least once
every 3 years for the northern sea otter in Washington State, as
specified under section 117 of the MMPA. Section 117(c) directs the
Service to review a stock assessment if significant new information
indicates that the status of the stock has changed, which could occur
prior to the end of the next 3 years. If the Service obtains new
information that indicates this stock has established a range
significantly beyond the current range, or has undergone some other
significant change, the Service will review the stock assessment report
and revise as appropriate at that time.
Comment 2: The Nmin, PBR, and Figure 2 should be amended
to reflect the results of the 2007 survey conducted by the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife and appropriate references to the
unpublished reports, both 2006 and 2007, should be provided.
Response: The Service agrees with this comment and has updated the
stock assessment report to reflect the 2007 survey data. The 2007
survey data identifies an Nmin of 1,125 and, therefore, the
re-calculated PBR is 11 animals. The citations have also been updated
to indicate that information on the 2006 and 2007 unpublished survey
data may be obtained by contacting the Washington Department of Fish
and Wildlife.
Comment 3: In the discussion under Fisheries Information, clarify
the location of Fishery Areas 4 and 4A and when this fishery was last
active. In reference to Observer Coverage in these fisheries, listed in
Table 1, provide further clarification as to what is meant by ``1-11
net days observed.''
Response: The location of Fishery Areas 4 and 4A has been
clarified. The information supplied to us by the Makah Tribe and the
NMFS regarding the Makah Northern Washington Marine Set-gillnet Fishery
was not broken out by Fishery Area; therefore, we can not provide
further fishing effort beyond the activity level already included in
Table 1 in the stock assessment report. The observer coverage
information provided in Table 1 in the stock assessment report is in
the format provided by the sources. Further clarification is not
available to us for inclusion in the stock assessment report.
Comment 4: Clarify whether the NMFS, who collects data through a
self-reporting system on the incidental take of marine mammals in
fisheries, has received reports of sea otters taken in treaty and non-
treaty fisheries in Washington State or has simply not
[[Page 60713]]
provided the reports to the Service. Specify the corresponding time
frame.
Response: The Service has updated the stock assessment report to
reflect the requested changes. However, the information provided by the
NMFS did not include a time frame; therefore, a time frame has not been
included in the updated stock assessment report.
Comment 5: Given the apparent lack of voluntary reports of sea
otter takes and the unreliability of voluntary reporting schemes in
general, remove the word ``more'' from the sentence on page 5 that
states ``* * * the information provided by the NMFS is not sufficient
to provide a more accurate estimate of annual mortality * * *.''
Further, a statement should be made that a useful estimate of fishing
mortality will require instituting observer coverage to obtain data on
fishery efforts.
Response: We have revised the final stock assessment report to
reflect this comment. The fishery observer programs are conducted by
the NMFS of the Department of Commerce, and, therefore, institution of
observer coverage in fisheries must be directed to them. We have
forwarded this suggestion to them (see response to comment 6).
Comment 6: The stock assessment report concludes that available
information is not adequate to make a reliable assessment of incidental
take levels. Therefore, the Service should consult with NMFS, Tribal
authorities, and other relevant groups to arrange for the placement of
observers aboard trap and gillnet fishing vessels that may incidentally
take sea otters.
Response: The fishery observer programs are under the
administration of the NMFS in accordance with section 118 of the MMPA.
With the exception of the Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet, all
commercial fisheries in the State of Washington that have the potential
to take sea otters are classified as Category III in NMFS' List of
Fisheries. Category III fisheries are not required to accommodate
observers. Further, under this program, fishery interactions are self-
reporting or, in some cases, identified as excluded, e.g., treaty
Tribal fishing. It is the position of the Service that the incidental
take of sea otters by treaty Tribal fishing activities must be
authorized under the MMPA. Nonetheless, obtaining incidental take
information is a challenge. However, the Service will continue to work
with the NMFS, Tribal authorities, and others to the extent practicable
under these conditions to obtain better data.
Comment 7: Illegal taking of sea otters is being perpetrated by
``fish profiteers'' and the Service is not taking appropriate action.
Response: The stock assessment report presents all of the human-
caused mortality of sea otters that has been made known to the Service.
Reference Not Cited in the Notice of Availability of Draft Revised
SAR:
Jameson, R.J. and S. Jeffries. 2008. Results of the 2007 Survey of
the Reintroduced Sea Otter Population in Washington State. Unpublished
Report. 7pp. Copies may be obtained from the Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife.
Authority: The authority for this action is the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361-1407).
Dated: October 2, 2008.
Kenneth Stansell,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E8-24195 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P