Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report, 60711-60713 [E8-24195]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R4–ES–2008–N0131; 41545–1261– 0000–D2] Interagency Florida Panther Response Plan Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability: environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact for the Interagency Florida Panther Response Plan. AGENCY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service, announce our decision and the availability of the Final Environmental Assessment (EA) and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for our Interagency Florida Panther Response Plan. Our EA considers alternatives for managing conflicts between humans and the endangered Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended. ADDRESSES: A copy of the EA and FONSI may be obtained by writing to: Layne Hamilton, Refuge Manager, Florida Panther and Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuges, 3860 Tollgate Boulevard, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34114, or Elizabeth Souheaver, Area II Supervisor, Southeast Regional Office, Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Suite 420, Atlanta, GA 30345. The EA and/or FONSI may also be accessed and downloaded from the Service’s Internet Web site: https:// www.fws.gov/verobeach/. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Layne Hamilton, at address in ADDRESSES, or at 239–353–8442, extension 227 (telephone), or Ms. Elizabeth Souheaver, Area II Supervisor, at address in ADDRESSES, or at 404–679– 7163 (telephone). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this notice, we announce our decision and availability of the final EA and FONSI for the Interagency Florida Panther Response Plan in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act’s (NEPA’s) implementing regulations at 40 CFR 1506.6 (b). We released a draft of the plan to the public as a Draft EA for ‘‘Guidelines for Living with Florida Panther and the Interagency Florida Panther Response Plan,’’ and requested comments in a notice in the Federal Register on May 25, 2006 (71 FR 30156). To improve the quality and credibility of the scientific information, we also conducted a formal peer review process for the draft plan. Responses to public, jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Oct 10, 2008 Jkt 217001 tribal, and peer review comments were included in the Revised EA appendices. On November 2, 2007, we released the Revised EA and the Interagency Florida Panther Response Plan to the public, requesting comments via a Federal Register notice (72 FR 62256). We have included responses to specific comments in the Final EA appendices. We have coordinated this proposal with the National Park Service, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and local Indian tribes. The Draft, Revised, and Final EAs identified and evaluated three alternatives for managing the conflicts between humans and the endangered Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Alternative A (Preferred Action) manages human-panther interactions with an interagency response team and an established plan that prioritizes public safety and evaluates each situation by analyzing panther behavior and human activity. Alternative B (No Action) does not utilize an interagency team or a response plan, but responds to human-panther interactions on a case-by-case basis without established protocols or guidelines. Alternative C includes a response team and a plan that differs from Alternative A by providing rigid protocols based on frequency of panther sightings and proximity to human-occupied structures, without considering panther behavior or influences of human activity on panther behavior. The EA consists of a thorough analysis of the environmental, social, economic, and cultural resource considerations for each alternative. The FONSI documents the selection of Alternative A. This alternative was selected over the other alternatives because it utilizes the best available science in a consistent manner to manage human-panther interactions. Under this alternative, the Response Team’s responsibility is to review information related to human-panther interactions, classify these situations based on the documented behavior of the panther, provide an action plan to the responsible agencies, and take approved and appropriate actions. The plan provides the responding officials with the flexibility to address emergency situations swiftly. Also, public outreach and education are an important element of this proposal, recognizing the importance of teaching people how to safely live and recreate in panther habitat. There are no conflicts with local, State, regional, or Federal plans or policies. Authority: We provide this notice under NEPA regulations at 40 CFR 1506.6. PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 60711 Dated: October 6, 2008. Cynthia K. Dohner, Deputy Regional Director, Southeast Region. [FR Doc. E8–24256 Filed 10–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS–R9–FHC–2008–N0219;13410–1124– 0000 L5] Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability of final revised marine mammal stock assessment report for the northern sea otter stock in Washington State; response to comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has incorporated public comments into a revision of the marine mammal stock assessment report for the northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) stock in Washington State. The 2008 final stock assessment report is now complete and available to the public. ADDRESSES: Send requests for printed copies of the final stock assessment report to: Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102, Lacey, WA 98503; (360) 753–9440. Copies of the final revised stock assessment report are also available on the Internet in Adobe Acrobat format at https://www.fws.gov/ westwafwo. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: One of the goals of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361– 1407) is to ensure that stocks of marine mammals occurring in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States do not experience a level of human-caused mortality and serious injury that is likely to cause the stock to be reduced below its optimum sustainable population level (OSP). OSP is defined as ‘‘* * * the number of animals which will result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species, keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.’’ To help accomplish the goal of maintaining marine mammal stocks at their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA requires the Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1 60712 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Notices prepare stock assessment reports for each marine mammal stock that occurs in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States. These stock assessments are to be based on the best scientific information available and are, therefore, prepared in consultation with established regional scientific review groups. Each stock assessment must include: (1) A description of the stock and its geographic range; (2) minimum population estimate, maximum net productivity rate, and current population trend; (3) estimate of humancaused mortality and serious injury; (4) commercial fishery interactions; (5) status of the stock; and (6) potential biological removal level (PBR). The PBR is defined as ‘‘* * * the maximum number of animals, not including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its OSP.’’ The PBR is the product of the minimum population estimate of the stock (Nmin); one-half the maximum theoretical or estimated net productivity rate of the stock at a small population size (Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of between 0.1 and 1.0, which is intended to compensate for uncertainty and unknown estimation errors. Section 117 of the MMPA also requires the Service and the NMFS to review and revise the stock assessment reports: (A) At least annually for stocks that are specified as strategic stocks; (B) at least annually for stocks for which significant new information is available; and (C) at least once every 3 years for all other stocks. A strategic stock is defined in the MMPA as a marine mammal stock: (A) For which the level of direct humancaused mortality exceeds the PBR; (B) which, based on the best available scientific information, is declining and is likely to be listed as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) within the foreseeable future; or (C) which is listed as a threatened or endangered species under the ESA, or is designated as depleted under the MMPA. A draft revised stock assessment report for the northern sea otter stock in Washington State was made available for a 90-day public review and comment period on April 17, 2008 (73 FR 20931). Prior to releasing it for public review and comment, the Service subjected the draft report to internal technical review and to scientific review by the Pacific Regional Scientific Review Group established under the MMPA. Following the close of the comment period, the Service revised the stock assessment and prepared the final 2008 stock assessment report. We revised the final stock assessment report based on public comments received (see below). The status of the stock remains unchanged from the draft revised SAR that was provided for public comment; however, the PBR level was amended to reflect the results of the 2007 survey conducted by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. We also provided further clarification in the discussion of fisheries information as it relates to reports of incidental take. Most of the public comments received were addressed by adding new text for clarity. A summary of the final revised stock assessment report is presented in Table 1. The table lists the stock’s Nmin, Rmax, Fr, PBR, annual estimated humancaused mortality and serious injury, and status. TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF FINAL REVISED STOCK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE NORTHERN SEA OTTER STOCK IN WASHINGTON STATE Stock Nmin jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Northern sea otters (Washington State) 1,125 Comments and Responses The Service received comments from 2 entities on the draft stock assessment report. The issues raised in those comments and our responses are provided below. Comment 1: The Service should clarify that the next revision on this assessment will be prepared within 3 years or sooner, if the Washington stock expands its range into Oregon or British Columbia, or undergoes any significant change in the status of the stock. Response: The Service will continue to review available information on an annual basis and revise the stock assessment report at least once every 3 years for the northern sea otter in Washington State, as specified under section 117 of the MMPA. Section 117(c) directs the Service to review a stock assessment if significant new information indicates that the status of the stock has changed, which could occur prior to the end of the next 3 years. If the Service obtains new information that indicates this stock has established a range significantly beyond VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Oct 10, 2008 Jkt 217001 Rmax 0.20 Fr Annual estimated average humancaused mortality PBR 0.1 11 Unknown ............................................... the current range, or has undergone some other significant change, the Service will review the stock assessment report and revise as appropriate at that time. Comment 2: The Nmin, PBR, and Figure 2 should be amended to reflect the results of the 2007 survey conducted by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and appropriate references to the unpublished reports, both 2006 and 2007, should be provided. Response: The Service agrees with this comment and has updated the stock assessment report to reflect the 2007 survey data. The 2007 survey data identifies an Nmin of 1,125 and, therefore, the re-calculated PBR is 11 animals. The citations have also been updated to indicate that information on the 2006 and 2007 unpublished survey data may be obtained by contacting the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Comment 3: In the discussion under Fisheries Information, clarify the location of Fishery Areas 4 and 4A and when this fishery was last active. In PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Stock status Non-Strategic reference to Observer Coverage in these fisheries, listed in Table 1, provide further clarification as to what is meant by ‘‘1–11 net days observed.’’ Response: The location of Fishery Areas 4 and 4A has been clarified. The information supplied to us by the Makah Tribe and the NMFS regarding the Makah Northern Washington Marine Set-gillnet Fishery was not broken out by Fishery Area; therefore, we can not provide further fishing effort beyond the activity level already included in Table 1 in the stock assessment report. The observer coverage information provided in Table 1 in the stock assessment report is in the format provided by the sources. Further clarification is not available to us for inclusion in the stock assessment report. Comment 4: Clarify whether the NMFS, who collects data through a selfreporting system on the incidental take of marine mammals in fisheries, has received reports of sea otters taken in treaty and non-treaty fisheries in Washington State or has simply not E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Notices provided the reports to the Service. Specify the corresponding time frame. Response: The Service has updated the stock assessment report to reflect the requested changes. However, the information provided by the NMFS did not include a time frame; therefore, a time frame has not been included in the updated stock assessment report. Comment 5: Given the apparent lack of voluntary reports of sea otter takes and the unreliability of voluntary reporting schemes in general, remove the word ‘‘more’’ from the sentence on page 5 that states ‘‘* * * the information provided by the NMFS is not sufficient to provide a more accurate estimate of annual mortality * * *.’’ Further, a statement should be made that a useful estimate of fishing mortality will require instituting observer coverage to obtain data on fishery efforts. Response: We have revised the final stock assessment report to reflect this comment. The fishery observer programs are conducted by the NMFS of the Department of Commerce, and, therefore, institution of observer coverage in fisheries must be directed to them. We have forwarded this suggestion to them (see response to comment 6). Comment 6: The stock assessment report concludes that available information is not adequate to make a reliable assessment of incidental take levels. Therefore, the Service should consult with NMFS, Tribal authorities, and other relevant groups to arrange for the placement of observers aboard trap and gillnet fishing vessels that may incidentally take sea otters. Response: The fishery observer programs are under the administration of the NMFS in accordance with section 118 of the MMPA. With the exception of the Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet, all commercial fisheries in the State of Washington that have the potential to take sea otters are classified as Category III in NMFS’ List of Fisheries. Category III fisheries are not required to accommodate observers. Further, under this program, fishery interactions are self-reporting or, in some cases, identified as excluded, e.g., treaty Tribal fishing. It is the position of the Service that the incidental take of sea otters by treaty Tribal fishing activities must be authorized under the MMPA. Nonetheless, obtaining incidental take information is a challenge. However, the Service will continue to work with the NMFS, Tribal authorities, and others to the extent practicable under these conditions to obtain better data. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:37 Oct 10, 2008 Jkt 217001 Comment 7: Illegal taking of sea otters is being perpetrated by ‘‘fish profiteers’’ and the Service is not taking appropriate action. Response: The stock assessment report presents all of the human-caused mortality of sea otters that has been made known to the Service. Reference Not Cited in the Notice of Availability of Draft Revised SAR: Jameson, R.J. and S. Jeffries. 2008. Results of the 2007 Survey of the Reintroduced Sea Otter Population in Washington State. Unpublished Report. 7pp. Copies may be obtained from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Authority: The authority for this action is the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361–1407). Dated: October 2, 2008. Kenneth Stansell, Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service. [FR Doc. E8–24195 Filed 10–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P 60713 at (703) 358–2018, or by e-mail at Joe_Starinchak@fws.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), this notice announces meetings of the ANS Task Force. The ANS Task Force was established by the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990. Topics the ANS Task Force plans to cover during the meeting include: Regional Panel issues and recommendations, Committee recommendations, and consideration for approval of state ANS management plans. The agenda and other related meeting information are on the ANS Task Force Web site at: https:// anstaskforce.gov/meetings.php. Dated: September 22, 2008. Gary Frazer, Co-Chair, Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force, Assistant Director—Fisheries & Habitat Conservation. [FR Doc. E8–24228 Filed 10–10–08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR [FWS–R9–FHC–2008–N0265; 94240–1341– 0000–N3–N5] Bureau of Land Management Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force Meeting AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Task Force. The meeting is open to the public. The meeting topics are identified in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. DATES: The ANS Task Force will meet from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday, October 28, and Wednesday, October 29, 2008. ADDRESSES: The ANS Task Force meeting will take place at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Room 200, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203; (703) 358–1843. You may inspect minutes of the meeting at the office of the Chief, Division of Fish and Wildlife Management and Habitat Restoration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203, during regular business hours, Monday through Friday. You may also view the minutes on the ANS Task Force Web site at: https:// anstaskforce.gov/meetings.php. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Starinchak, Branch of Invasive Species, PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [F–14876–M, F–14876–N; AK–964–1410– KC–P] Alaska Native Claims Selection Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance. AGENCY: SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc., Successor in Interest to Kivalina Sinuakmeut Corporation. The lands are in the vicinity of Kivalina, Alaska, and are located in: Kateel River Meridian, Alaska T. 29 N., R. 24 W., Secs. 3 to 10, inclusive; Secs. 13 to 23, inclusive; Secs. 28 to 33, inclusive. Containing approximately 14,663 acres. The subsurface estate in these lands will be conveyed to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc. when the surface estate is conveyed to NANA Regional Corporation, Inc., Successor in Interest to Kivalina Sinuakmeut Corporation. Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Arctic Sounder. E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60711-60713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R9-FHC-2008-N0219;13410-1124-0000 L5]


Marine Mammal Protection Act; Stock Assessment Report

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of final revised marine mammal stock 
assessment report for the northern sea otter stock in Washington State; 
response to comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), 
the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has incorporated public 
comments into a revision of the marine mammal stock assessment report 
for the northern sea otter (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) stock in Washington 
State. The 2008 final stock assessment report is now complete and 
available to the public.

ADDRESSES: Send requests for printed copies of the final stock 
assessment report to: Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Western 
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office, 510 Desmond Drive SE, Suite 102, 
Lacey, WA 98503; (360) 753-9440. Copies of the final revised stock 
assessment report are also available on the Internet in Adobe Acrobat 
format at https://www.fws.gov/westwafwo.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: One of the goals of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 
1361-1407) is to ensure that stocks of marine mammals occurring in 
waters under the jurisdiction of the United States do not experience a 
level of human-caused mortality and serious injury that is likely to 
cause the stock to be reduced below its optimum sustainable population 
level (OSP). OSP is defined as ``* * * the number of animals which will 
result in the maximum productivity of the population or the species, 
keeping in mind the carrying capacity of the habitat and the health of 
the ecosystem of which they form a constituent element.''
    To help accomplish the goal of maintaining marine mammal stocks at 
their OSPs, section 117 of the MMPA requires the Service and the 
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to

[[Page 60712]]

prepare stock assessment reports for each marine mammal stock that 
occurs in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States. These 
stock assessments are to be based on the best scientific information 
available and are, therefore, prepared in consultation with established 
regional scientific review groups. Each stock assessment must include: 
(1) A description of the stock and its geographic range; (2) minimum 
population estimate, maximum net productivity rate, and current 
population trend; (3) estimate of human-caused mortality and serious 
injury; (4) commercial fishery interactions; (5) status of the stock; 
and (6) potential biological removal level (PBR). The PBR is defined as 
``* * * the maximum number of animals, not including natural 
mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal stock while 
allowing that stock to reach or maintain its OSP.'' The PBR is the 
product of the minimum population estimate of the stock 
(Nmin); one-half the maximum theoretical or estimated net 
productivity rate of the stock at a small population size 
(Rmax); and a recovery factor (Fr) of between 0.1 
and 1.0, which is intended to compensate for uncertainty and unknown 
estimation errors.
    Section 117 of the MMPA also requires the Service and the NMFS to 
review and revise the stock assessment reports: (A) At least annually 
for stocks that are specified as strategic stocks; (B) at least 
annually for stocks for which significant new information is available; 
and (C) at least once every 3 years for all other stocks.
    A strategic stock is defined in the MMPA as a marine mammal stock: 
(A) For which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds the 
PBR; (B) which, based on the best available scientific information, is 
declining and is likely to be listed as a threatened species under the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) within the foreseeable future; or 
(C) which is listed as a threatened or endangered species under the 
ESA, or is designated as depleted under the MMPA.
    A draft revised stock assessment report for the northern sea otter 
stock in Washington State was made available for a 90-day public review 
and comment period on April 17, 2008 (73 FR 20931). Prior to releasing 
it for public review and comment, the Service subjected the draft 
report to internal technical review and to scientific review by the 
Pacific Regional Scientific Review Group established under the MMPA. 
Following the close of the comment period, the Service revised the 
stock assessment and prepared the final 2008 stock assessment report.
    We revised the final stock assessment report based on public 
comments received (see below). The status of the stock remains 
unchanged from the draft revised SAR that was provided for public 
comment; however, the PBR level was amended to reflect the results of 
the 2007 survey conducted by the Washington Department of Fish and 
Wildlife. We also provided further clarification in the discussion of 
fisheries information as it relates to reports of incidental take. Most 
of the public comments received were addressed by adding new text for 
clarity.
    A summary of the final revised stock assessment report is presented 
in Table 1. The table lists the stock's Nmin, 
Rmax, Fr, PBR, annual estimated human-caused 
mortality and serious injury, and status.

 Table 1--Summary of Final Revised Stock Assessment Report for the Northern Sea Otter Stock in Washington State
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         Annual estimated
            Stock                Nmin      Rmax       Fr        PBR    average human-caused      Stock status
                                                                             mortality
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Northern sea otters               1,125      0.20       0.1        11  Unknown.............  Non-Strategic
 (Washington State).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments and Responses

    The Service received comments from 2 entities on the draft stock 
assessment report. The issues raised in those comments and our 
responses are provided below.
    Comment 1: The Service should clarify that the next revision on 
this assessment will be prepared within 3 years or sooner, if the 
Washington stock expands its range into Oregon or British Columbia, or 
undergoes any significant change in the status of the stock.
    Response: The Service will continue to review available information 
on an annual basis and revise the stock assessment report at least once 
every 3 years for the northern sea otter in Washington State, as 
specified under section 117 of the MMPA. Section 117(c) directs the 
Service to review a stock assessment if significant new information 
indicates that the status of the stock has changed, which could occur 
prior to the end of the next 3 years. If the Service obtains new 
information that indicates this stock has established a range 
significantly beyond the current range, or has undergone some other 
significant change, the Service will review the stock assessment report 
and revise as appropriate at that time.
    Comment 2: The Nmin, PBR, and Figure 2 should be amended 
to reflect the results of the 2007 survey conducted by the Washington 
Department of Fish and Wildlife and appropriate references to the 
unpublished reports, both 2006 and 2007, should be provided.
    Response: The Service agrees with this comment and has updated the 
stock assessment report to reflect the 2007 survey data. The 2007 
survey data identifies an Nmin of 1,125 and, therefore, the 
re-calculated PBR is 11 animals. The citations have also been updated 
to indicate that information on the 2006 and 2007 unpublished survey 
data may be obtained by contacting the Washington Department of Fish 
and Wildlife.
    Comment 3: In the discussion under Fisheries Information, clarify 
the location of Fishery Areas 4 and 4A and when this fishery was last 
active. In reference to Observer Coverage in these fisheries, listed in 
Table 1, provide further clarification as to what is meant by ``1-11 
net days observed.''
    Response: The location of Fishery Areas 4 and 4A has been 
clarified. The information supplied to us by the Makah Tribe and the 
NMFS regarding the Makah Northern Washington Marine Set-gillnet Fishery 
was not broken out by Fishery Area; therefore, we can not provide 
further fishing effort beyond the activity level already included in 
Table 1 in the stock assessment report. The observer coverage 
information provided in Table 1 in the stock assessment report is in 
the format provided by the sources. Further clarification is not 
available to us for inclusion in the stock assessment report.
    Comment 4: Clarify whether the NMFS, who collects data through a 
self-reporting system on the incidental take of marine mammals in 
fisheries, has received reports of sea otters taken in treaty and non-
treaty fisheries in Washington State or has simply not

[[Page 60713]]

provided the reports to the Service. Specify the corresponding time 
frame.
    Response: The Service has updated the stock assessment report to 
reflect the requested changes. However, the information provided by the 
NMFS did not include a time frame; therefore, a time frame has not been 
included in the updated stock assessment report.
    Comment 5: Given the apparent lack of voluntary reports of sea 
otter takes and the unreliability of voluntary reporting schemes in 
general, remove the word ``more'' from the sentence on page 5 that 
states ``* * * the information provided by the NMFS is not sufficient 
to provide a more accurate estimate of annual mortality * * *.'' 
Further, a statement should be made that a useful estimate of fishing 
mortality will require instituting observer coverage to obtain data on 
fishery efforts.
    Response: We have revised the final stock assessment report to 
reflect this comment. The fishery observer programs are conducted by 
the NMFS of the Department of Commerce, and, therefore, institution of 
observer coverage in fisheries must be directed to them. We have 
forwarded this suggestion to them (see response to comment 6).
    Comment 6: The stock assessment report concludes that available 
information is not adequate to make a reliable assessment of incidental 
take levels. Therefore, the Service should consult with NMFS, Tribal 
authorities, and other relevant groups to arrange for the placement of 
observers aboard trap and gillnet fishing vessels that may incidentally 
take sea otters.
    Response: The fishery observer programs are under the 
administration of the NMFS in accordance with section 118 of the MMPA. 
With the exception of the Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet, all 
commercial fisheries in the State of Washington that have the potential 
to take sea otters are classified as Category III in NMFS' List of 
Fisheries. Category III fisheries are not required to accommodate 
observers. Further, under this program, fishery interactions are self-
reporting or, in some cases, identified as excluded, e.g., treaty 
Tribal fishing. It is the position of the Service that the incidental 
take of sea otters by treaty Tribal fishing activities must be 
authorized under the MMPA. Nonetheless, obtaining incidental take 
information is a challenge. However, the Service will continue to work 
with the NMFS, Tribal authorities, and others to the extent practicable 
under these conditions to obtain better data.
    Comment 7: Illegal taking of sea otters is being perpetrated by 
``fish profiteers'' and the Service is not taking appropriate action.
    Response: The stock assessment report presents all of the human-
caused mortality of sea otters that has been made known to the Service.
    Reference Not Cited in the Notice of Availability of Draft Revised 
SAR:
    Jameson, R.J. and S. Jeffries. 2008. Results of the 2007 Survey of 
the Reintroduced Sea Otter Population in Washington State. Unpublished 
Report. 7pp. Copies may be obtained from the Washington Department of 
Fish and Wildlife.

    Authority: The authority for this action is the Marine Mammal 
Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361-1407).

    Dated: October 2, 2008.
Kenneth Stansell,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-24195 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.