Share Insurance for Revocable Trust Accounts, 60616-60622 [E8-23922]
Download as PDF
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
60616
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
security-related aspects. Incorporating
the above attributes may promote more
efficient and effective design reviews.
However, the listing of a particular
attribute does not necessarily mean that
specific licensing criteria will attach to
that attribute. Designs with some or all
of these attributes are also likely to be
more readily understood by the general
public. Indeed, the number and nature
of the regulatory requirements may
depend on the extent to which an
individual advanced reactor design
incorporates general attributes such as
those listed previously.
In addition, the Commission expects
that the safety features of these
advanced reactor designs will be
complemented by the operational
program for Emergency Planning (EP).
This EP operational program, in turn,
must be demonstrated by inspections,
tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria
to ensure effective implementation of
established measures. The Commission
also expects that advanced reactor
designs will comply with the
Commission’s safety goal policy
statement (51 FR 28044; August 4, 1986,
as corrected and republished at 51 FR
30028; August 21, 1986), and the policy
statement on conversion to the metric
measurement system (61 FR 31169; June
19, 1996).
To provide for more timely and
effective regulation of advanced
reactors, the Commission encourages
the earliest possible interaction of
applicants, vendors, other government
agencies, and the NRC to provide for
early identification of regulatory
requirements for advanced reactors and
to provide all interested parties,
including the public, with a timely,
independent assessment of the safety
and security characteristics of advanced
reactor designs. Such licensing
interaction and guidance early in the
design process will contribute towards
minimizing complexity and adding
stability and predictability in the
licensing and regulation of advanced
reactors.
While the NRC does not develop new
reactor designs, the Commission intends
to develop the capability, when
appropriate, for timely assessment and
response to innovative and advanced
reactor designs that might be presented
for NRC review. Prior experience has
shown that new reactor designs—even
variations of established designs—may
involve technical problems that must be
solved to ensure adequate protection of
the public health and safety. The earlier
these design problems are identified, the
earlier satisfactory resolution can be
achieved. Prospective applicants are
reminded that, while the NRC will
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
undertake to review and comment on
new design concepts, the applicants are
responsible for documentation and
research necessary to support a specific
application. Research activities would
include testing of new safety or security
features that differ from existing designs
for operating reactors, or that use
simplified, inherent, passive means to
accomplish their safety or security
function. The testing shall ensure that
these new features will perform as
predicted, will provide for the
collection of sufficient data to validate
computer codes, and will show that the
effects of system interactions are
acceptable.
During the initial phase of advanced
reactor development, the Commission
particularly encourages design
innovations that enhance safety,
reliability, and security (such as those
described previously) and that generally
depend on technology that is either
proven or can be demonstrated by a
straightforward technology development
program. In the absence of a significant
history of operating experience on an
advanced concept reactor, plans for the
innovative use of proven technology
and/or new technology development
programs should be presented to the
NRC for review as early as possible, so
that the NRC can assess how the
proposed program might influence
regulatory requirements.
Finally, the NRC also believes that it
will be in the interest of the public as
well as the design vendors and the
prospective license applicants to
address security issues early in the
design stage to achieve a more robust
and effective security posture for future
nuclear power reactors.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day
of October 2008.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–24268 Filed 10–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 745
RIN 3133–AD54
Share Insurance for Revocable Trust
Accounts
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending its share
insurance rules to simplify coverage for
revocable trust accounts. The
amendments will make the rules easier
to understand and apply without
decreasing coverage, result in faster
share insurance determinations in the
event of a credit union closing, and help
improve public confidence in the credit
union system. The amendments
eliminate the concept of ‘‘qualifying
beneficiaries.’’ Also, for members with
revocable trust accounts totaling no
more than $500,000, coverage will be
determined without regard to the
proportional beneficial interest of each
beneficiary in the trust.
Under the amended rules, a trust
account owner with up to five different
beneficiaries named in all of his or her
revocable trust accounts at one NCUAinsured institution will be insured up to
$100,000 per beneficiary. Revocable
trust account owners with more than
$500,000 and more than five different
beneficiaries named in the trust(s) will
be insured for the greater of either:
$500,000 or the aggregate amount of all
the beneficiaries’ interests in the
trust(s), limited to $100,000 per
beneficiary.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
14, 2008. Written comments must be
received on or before December 15,
2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (Please
send comments by one method only):
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• NCUA Web Site: https://
www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/
proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on Share Insurance for
Revocable Trust Accounts’’ in the e-mail
subject line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for e-mail.
• Mail: Address to Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mail address.
Public Inspection: All public
comments are available on the agency’s
Web site at https://www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/comments as
submitted, except as may not be
possible for technical reasons. Public
comments will not be edited to remove
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
any identifying or contact information.
Paper copies of comments may be
inspected in NCUA’s law library at 1775
Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314,
by appointment weekdays between
9 a.m. and 3 p.m. To make an
appointment, call (703) 518–6546 or
send an e-mail to OGCMail@ncua.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frank Kressman, Staff Attorney, at the
above address, or telephone: (703) 518–
6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
A. Background
NCUA insures member share accounts
in all federally-chartered credit unions
and the vast majority of state-chartered
credit unions. This accounts for
approximately 98% of all credit unions
in the United States. Despite NCUA’s
best efforts to provide clear information
on insurance coverage for revocable
trust accounts and recent rule changes
to simplify that determination, NCUA
recognizes there is still significant
public and industry confusion about the
insurance coverage of revocable trust
accounts. See NCUA Web site at
https://www.ncua.gov/ShareInsurance/
index.htm; 68 FR 75111 (December 30,
2003); 69 FR 8798 (February 26, 2004).
This is evidenced by the great volume
of share insurance inquiries NCUA has
received as a result of recent events in
the financial markets and is particularly
true of living trust accounts, one of the
two types of revocable trust accounts
NCUA insures. This is largely due to the
increasingly complex nature of living
trusts.1 NCUA believes the amendments
in this interim rule will further clarify
how revocable trust accounts are
covered, enhance NCUA’s ability to
help maintain public confidence and
stability in the credit union system, and
protect insured members.
B. Current Share Insurance Rules for
Revocable Trust Accounts
NCUA insures informal and formal
revocable trust accounts under its share
insurance rules. 12 CFR Part 745.
Informal trust accounts are comprised
simply of a signature card on which the
member designates the beneficiaries to
whom the funds in the account will
pass upon the member’s death. These
are the most common type of revocable
trust accounts and generally are referred
to as ‘‘payable-on-death’’ (POD)
accounts or in-trust-for (ITF) accounts or
Totten Trust accounts. Throughout this
1 Because of the complexities of living trusts,
NCUA’s insurance determinations on those
accounts could be time consuming and delay
members receiving their insured account proceeds.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
preamble, NCUA will refer to all
informal trust accounts as POD
accounts. Formal revocable trust
accounts are established in connection
with a formal written revocable trust
document. They are increasingly
popular trusts created for estate
planning purposes and are often
referred to as: Living trusts, family
trusts, marital trusts, survivor’s trusts,
by-pass trusts, generation-skipping
trusts, AB trusts or special needs trusts.
Throughout this preamble, NCUA will
refer to all formal revocable trusts as
living trusts. Like an informal revocable
trust, a living trust is created by a
member, also known as a grantor or
settlor, over which the member as
owner retains control during his or her
lifetime. Upon the owner’s death, the
trust generally becomes irrevocable.
NCUA insures POD and living trust
accounts under § 745.4 of its share
insurance rules. 12 CFR 745.4.
NCUA’s rules provide that all
revocable trust accounts (both POD
accounts and living trust accounts) are
insured up to $100,000 per ‘‘qualifying
beneficiary’’ designated by the owner of
the account. Id. If there are multiple
owners of a revocable trust account,
coverage is available separately for each
owner, per qualifying beneficiary as to
each owner. Qualifying beneficiaries are
defined as the owner’s spouse, children,
grandchildren, parents and siblings. 12
CFR 745.4(b).
The per-qualifying beneficiary
coverage available on revocable trust
accounts is separate from the insurance
coverage afforded to members in
connection with other accounts they
own in other ownership capacities at
the same NCUA-insured credit union.
For example, if a member has a singleownership account with a balance of
$100,000 and a POD account (naming at
least one qualifying beneficiary) with a
balance of $100,000 at the same NCUAinsured credit union, both accounts
would be insured separately for a
combined coverage amount of $200,000.
Under our current rules, separate, perbeneficiary insurance coverage is
available for revocable trust accounts
only if the account satisfies certain
requirements including: (1) The account
must evidence the owner’s intent that
the funds shall belong to the designated
beneficiaries upon the owner’s death;
(2) each beneficiary must be a qualifying
beneficiary; and (3) for POD accounts,
the beneficiaries must be specifically
named in the account records of the
credit union. Under the current rules,
the beneficiaries of a living trust need
not be indicated in the credit union’s
records. 12 CFR 745.4(e).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60617
If a revocable trust account owner
names one or more non-qualifying
beneficiaries in the account or trust, the
funds corresponding to those nonqualifying beneficiaries are considered
the single-ownership funds of the owner
and insured under that category of
coverage. For example, assume a
member owns a POD account (and no
other accounts at the same credit union)
that names his spouse and a friend as
beneficiaries. The account has a balance
of $200,000. The coverage would be
$100,000 under the revocable trust
coverage rules because he has named
one qualifying beneficiary, and
$100,000 would be insured under the
single-ownership coverage rules because
the funds attributable to the nonqualifying beneficiary (the friend)
would be considered the owner’s singleownership funds and thus insured
under that category of ownership. If the
account owner in this example also had
a single-ownership account with a
balance of $50,000, then the $100,000
(attributable to the non-qualifying
beneficiary) from his POD account
would be added to the $50,000 held in
the single-ownership account and
insured to a limit of $100,000. Thus,
$50,000 would be uninsured.
As discussed above, both POD
accounts and living trust accounts are
types of revocable trust accounts
insured under the revocable trust
account category in NCUA’s share
insurance rules. Consequently, all funds
that a member holds in living trust
accounts and POD accounts naming the
same beneficiaries are aggregated for
insurance purposes and insured to the
applicable coverage limits. For example,
if a member has a living trust account
for $200,000 naming his children, A and
B, and also has a $200,000 POD account
naming A and B, the combined coverage
on the two aggregated accounts would
be $200,000 in total, not $200,000 per
account.
II. The Interim Rule
A. Overview
In this rulemaking, NCUA seeks to
make the insurance coverage rules for
revocable trust accounts easy to
understand and apply, without
decreasing coverage currently available
for revocable trust account owners, and
retain reasonable limitations on
coverage levels for revocable trust
account owners. Under the interim rule,
a trust account owner with up to
$500,000 in revocable trust accounts at
one NCUA-insured institution is
insured up to $100,000 per beneficiary.
NCUA believes this is the scenario that
will apply to the vast majority of
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
60618
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
revocable trust account owners.
Revocable trust account owners with
more than $500,000 in those accounts
and more than five different
beneficiaries named in the trust(s) are
insured differently. They will be
insured for the greater of either:
$500,000 or the aggregate amount of all
the beneficiaries’ interests in the
trust(s), limited to $100,000 per
beneficiary. Under the interim final
rule, coverage is based on the existence
of any beneficiary named in the
revocable trust, as long as the
beneficiary is a natural person, or a
charity or other non-profit organization.
If in establishing a POD account, the
owner names a living trust as the
beneficiary, we will consider the
beneficiaries of the trust to be the
beneficiaries of the POD account. As
discussed below, under the interim rule
the concept of ‘‘qualifying beneficiaries’’
is eliminated. For an account owner
with combined revocable trust account
balances of $500,000 or less, the
maximum available coverage would be
determined simply by multiplying the
number of beneficiaries by $100,000.
A living trust account with a balance
of $400,000, for example, would be
insured for up to $400,000 as long as
there are at least four beneficiaries
named in the trust.2 Different
proportional ownership interests of the
beneficiaries in the trust assets would
not affect the share insurance coverage.
So, in this example, the maximum
coverage would be $400,000 even if the
trust provided that beneficiaries A and
B are entitled to twenty percent each of
the trust assets and beneficiaries C and
D are entitled to thirty percent each of
the trust assets. As under the current
rules, however, a member would receive
a combined maximum coverage amount
of $100,000 for the same beneficiary
named in more than one revocable trust
account he or she owns at one credit
union. For example, if a member has a
POD account naming her son as a
beneficiary and a living trust account at
the same credit union naming the same
son as a beneficiary, the member would
be entitled to no more than $100,000
with respect to having named her son a
beneficiary of her revocable trust
accounts.
B. Eliminating the Concept of
‘‘Qualifying Beneficiaries’’
As explained above, previous
revocable trust account coverage was
based, in large part, on the number of
qualifying beneficiaries named in the
trust(s). In the most recent revocable
2 This assumes the account owner has no other
revocable trust accounts at the same credit union.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
trust account rule amended by this
interim final rule, qualifying
beneficiaries were defined as the
revocable trust account owner’s spouse,
children, grandchildren, parents and
siblings. 12 CFR 745.4(b). In previous
versions of that rule, the definition
included only the owner’s spouse,
children and grandchildren. The
rationale for expanding the definition of
qualifying beneficiaries to include the
account owner’s parents and siblings
was to recognize other family members
likely to be named in a person’s
revocable trust(s).
Before and since the expansion of the
definition of qualifying beneficiaries,
members and industry participants have
questioned the fairness of limiting the
coverage on revocable trust accounts to
only certain beneficiaries. Many have
stated the definition of qualifying
beneficiaries should include, among
others, an account holder’s nieces and
nephews, in-laws, great-grandchildren,
cousins, friends and charities.
Historically, in response to these
complaints, NCUA has taken the
position that there must be a reasonable
limitation of the amount of coverage
available on revocable trust accounts,
otherwise, there would be potentially
unlimited coverage under this account
category. Accordingly, NCUA has been
reluctant to amend the rules to provide
coverage for any beneficiary(ies) named
in a revocable trust without limitation.
Under the interim rule, however, the
NCUA believes that it can achieve
greater fairness under the revocable
trust rules by basing coverage on the
naming of any beneficiary in a revocable
trust, but concurrently imposing the
coverage qualifications discussed below
on accounts over $500,000.
In addition to addressing the fairness
issue, eliminating the concept of
‘‘qualifying beneficiaries’’ makes the
coverage rules easier to understand.
Members and credit unions no longer
need to know who is a qualifying
beneficiary and who is not. Also, this
revision will obviate the need for NCUA
claims agents, upon a credit union’s
failure to confirm that a beneficiary
named in a revocable trust account is a
‘‘qualifying beneficiary.’’ Thus, under
the interim rule, the NCUA anticipates
being able to make quicker share
insurance determinations on revocable
trust accounts, if necessary.
C. Accounts With Aggregate Balances of
$500,000 or Less; Determining Coverage
Without the Necessity of Discerning
Each Beneficiary’s Interest in the
Trust(s)
Previously, one of the most complex
and confusing aspects of determining
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
revocable trust account coverage was
having to discern and consider unequal
beneficial interests in revocable trusts.
This issue typically arises in the context
of a living trust that, for example,
provides either varying lump-sum
payments for designated beneficiaries or
different percentage interests in trust
assets to certain beneficiaries, or
different ‘‘remainder’’ interests in the
assets to the same or other beneficiaries.
The method for determining coverage in
some situations involving unequal
beneficial interests necessitates the
formulation and solving of simultaneous
equations. Credit unions and members
alike find applying these equations far
too complex. NCUA agrees.
Accordingly, a key component of the
interim rule is the ability to determine
coverage available to account owners
without regard to unequal interests of
the beneficiaries named in the revocable
trust(s). NCUA believes this rule change,
coupled with the recognition of all
beneficiaries, will make the revocable
trust account rules simpler and more
transparent.
D. Retaining Current Coverage Levels for
Revocable Trust Accounts With More
Than $500,000 and More Than Five
Beneficiaries Named in the Trust(s)
NCUA believes the vast majority of
revocable trust account owners have
less than $500,000 in revocable trust
accounts at one NCUA-insured
institution. In this scenario, under the
interim rule, coverage for an account
owner’s revocable trust accounts will be
determined simply by multiplying the
number of different beneficiaries named
in the trust(s) by $100,000.
To set reasonable limits on the
maximum coverage available to
revocable trust account owners and also
retain the coverage levels available to
revocable trust account owners under
previous rules, the interim rule provides
special treatment for members with
revocable trust accounts over $500,000
naming more than five beneficiaries.
Under the interim rule, revocable trust
account owners with more than
$500,000 and more than five
beneficiaries named in the trusts are
insured for the greater of either:
$500,000 or the aggregate amount of all
the beneficiaries’ interests in the
trust(s), limited to $100,000 per
beneficiary. This coverage is no less
than the coverage afforded to such
account owners under previous rules,
particularly because under the interim
rule the coverage is based on the
number of beneficiaries, not the number
of qualifying beneficiaries. Also, as
discussed below, under the interim rule,
life-estate interest holders are deemed to
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
have a $100,000 interest in the trust
assets.
For example, assume a member has a
living trust account that provides a life
estate interest for the member’s spouse,
$15,000 for his college alma mater,
$5,000 for each of three brothers and the
remaining amount to his friend. The
balance in the account is $600,000. The
analysis begins with recognizing the
account balance exceeds $500,000 and
the number of beneficiaries exceeds
five. Accordingly, under the interim
rule, the maximum coverage would be
the greater of either: $500,000 or the
aggregate beneficial interests of all the
beneficiaries (up to a limit of $100,000
per beneficiary). The beneficial interests
are: $100,000 for the spouse’s life estate
interest, $15,000 for the college, $5,000
for each brother (totaling $15,000), and
$100,000 for the friend (because of the
per-beneficiary limitation of $100,000).
The total beneficial interests, therefore,
are $230,000. Hence, the maximum
coverage afforded to the account owner
would be $500,000, the greater of
$500,000 or $230,000.
NCUA believes basing the coverage of
trust accounts in excess of $500,000
with more than five different
beneficiaries, on the ownership interest
of each beneficiary named in the
applicable trust(s) would prevent the
potential of having to provide unlimited
coverage with respect to revocable trust
accounts. Without such a limitation, a
member could name a limitless number
of beneficiaries each with a nominal
interest in the trust and obtain coverage
up to $100,000 for naming each such
beneficiary. For example, a revocable
trust account held in connection with a
trust entitling one beneficiary to $1
million and entitling each of nine other
beneficiaries to $1 would be insured for
$1 million, without the limitation
discussed above being imposed as part
of the interim rule.
E. Treatment of Life-Estate Interests
Another complicating factor in
determining the coverage for living trust
accounts is determining the value of life
estate interests. A life estate interest
usually means the life-estate beneficiary
is entitled to the income on the trust
assets during his or her lifetime. A large
percentage of living trusts provide a life
estate interest for one or more
beneficiaries. The most typical situation
is where a married person creates a trust
providing a life estate interest for his or
her surviving spouse and a remainder
interest for their children. NCUA’s
previous rules provide that, in such
situations, each life-estate holder and
each remainder-man (also known as
residuary beneficiaries) is deemed to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
have an equal interest in the trust assets
for account insurance purposes. 12 CFR
745.4(e). This rule has proven difficult
to apply, especially where the living
trust provides for lump-sum gifts for
certain beneficiaries, life estate interests
for others and different percentage
interests for the remainder-men, who
may be the same as or different from the
other beneficiaries. To simplify the
coverage rules, the interim rule revises
the previous valuation method for life
estate interests by deeming each such
interest to be $100,000, for purposes of
determining deposit insurance coverage.
The example above, involving a trust
providing for a spousal life estate
interest and bequests to the owner’s
college alma mater, brothers and friend,
demonstrates how the interim rule
would apply to a living trust providing
for a life-estate interest.
F. Treatment of Irrevocable Trusts
Springing From a Revocable Trust
Another complexity in determining
coverage for living trust accounts is that,
when it is created, a living trust is a
revocable trust but, when the owner
dies, the trust becomes irrevocable.3 At
that stage in the lifecycle of the living
trust, the funds corresponding to the
irrevocable trust are insured under
NCUA’s rules for irrevocable trust
accounts.4 Under those rules, coverage
is based on the non-contingent interest
of each beneficiary named in the trust.
In effect, when a living trust evolves
from a revocable trust to an irrevocable
trust the insurance coverage available
on the account is based on a different
set of rules, the irrevocable trust account
rules. As such, the coverage on the
account often decreases from what it
had been when the trust was insured
solely under the revocable trust rules.
To eliminate this complexity and the
confusion it generates, the interim final
rule provides that the methods for
determining the coverage of the living
trust account will remain the same
when the trust (or part of the trust)
converts to an irrevocable trust. For
example, a grantor has a living trust
account naming three beneficiaries,
each of whom receives a specified share
of the trust assets if he or she graduates
from college by age 25. Under the
previous insurance rules, when the
grantor is alive (meaning that the trust
is still a revocable trust) the maximum
coverage on the account is $300,000—
one grantor times three beneficiaries
times $100,000. Also under the previous
3 For jointly-owned living trusts, upon the death
of one of the owners, typically part of the trust
remains revocable and part becomes irrevocable.
4 12 CFR 745.9–1.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60619
rules, upon the grantor’s death (allowing
for the six-month grace period during
which coverage would remain the
same), the coverage reduces to $100,000
(if none of the beneficiaries has
graduated from college yet) because of
the contingent nature of the beneficial
interests provided for in the trust. Under
the interim rule, contingencies would
continue to be irrelevant for coverage
purposes after the grantor’s death, even
though the trust has evolved into an
irrevocable trust. In this example, under
the interim rule the coverage would still
be up to $300,000.
NCUA believes the continuity of
coverage provided for under this
component of the interim rule will
greatly simplify previous methods for
determining coverage for living trust
accounts. It is important to note,
however, that under the interim rule the
coverage on a living trust account could
still change during the lifecycle of the
trust. For example, when both grantors
in a co-grantor trust are alive, the
maximum coverage on the account
would be $1,000,000, because the
formula for determining coverage would
be: two grantors times five beneficiaries
times $100,000.5 If one of the grantors
dies, then the maximum coverage would
be one grantor times five beneficiaries
times $100,000.6 Coverage would
likewise decrease if one or more of the
beneficiaries named in the revocable
trust died, assuming the death of the
beneficiary(ies) would cause the total
number of beneficiaries to drop below
five.
G. Effective Date of the Interim Rule
The interim rule is effective on
October 3, 2008, the date on which the
NCUA Board approved the interim rule
by notation vote. 12 CFR 791.4. It is also
the date this interim rule was filed for
public inspection with the Office of the
Federal Register. In this regard, NCUA
invokes the ‘‘good cause’’ exception to
the requirements in the Administrative
Procedure Act 7 (APA) that, before a
rulemaking can be finalized, it must first
be issued for public comment and, once
finalized, must have a delayed effective
date of thirty days from the publication
date. NCUA believes good cause exists
for making the interim rule effective
immediately because, based on recent
experience, it is clear that many
members and credit unions do not fully
5 This assumes neither grantor has any other
revocable trust accounts at the same insured
institution.
6 Of course, NCUA’s rules provide for a six-month
grace period after the death of a member during
which the coverage would be the same as if the
member (grantor) were still alive. 12 CFR 745.2(e).
7 5 U.S.C. 553.
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
60620
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
understand the insurance rules for
revocable trust accounts. Also, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
has recently issued an almost identical
interim rule and it is important for
NCUA to do the same immediately to
maintain parity between the nation’s
two federal deposit/share insurance
programs. The interim rule simplifies
the coverage rules for revocable trust
accounts and, therefore, will provide
greater certainty to members and credit
unions as to how and to what extent
revocable trust accounts are insured.
Importantly, under the interim rule,
no member will be insured for an
amount less than he or she would have
been entitled to under the previous
revocable trust account rules. Some
members will be entitled to greater
coverage under the interim rule than
under previous rules, especially because
the interim rule eliminates the
requirement that a beneficiary be a
‘‘qualifying beneficiary’’ for the account
owner to be insured on a per-beneficiary
basis. Moreover, NCUA believes the
interim final rule will result in faster
share insurance determinations after a
credit union closing and will help
improve public confidence in the credit
union system.
For these reasons, NCUA has
determined that the public notice and
participation that ordinarily are
required by the APA before a regulation
may take effect would, in this case, be
contrary to the public interest and that
good cause exists for waiving the
customary 30-day delayed effective
date.8 Nevertheless, NCUA desires to
have the benefit of public comment
before adopting a permanent final rule
and invites interested parties to submit
comments during a 60-day comment
period. In adopting the final regulation,
NCUA will revise the interim final rule,
if appropriate, in light of the comments
received.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
III. Request for Comments
NCUA requests comments on all
aspects of the proposed rulemaking
including comments on: (1) Whether
‘‘over $500,000’’ is the proper threshold
for determining coverage for revocable
trust account owners based on the
beneficial interests of the trust
beneficiaries; (2) whether NCUA’s
irrevocable trust account rules, 12 CFR
745.9–1, should be revised so that all
trusts are covered by substantially the
same rules; and (3) what effect the
interim rule will have on the level of
insured shares.
IV. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact a rule may have on a substantial
number of small entities (primarily
those under ten million dollars in
assets). This interim final rule simplifies
and clarifies certain share insurance
coverages. Accordingly, it will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small credit
unions, and therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this rule
will not increase paperwork
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and regulations
of the Office of Management and
Budget.
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
NCUA has determined that this rule
will not affect family well-being within
the meaning of section 654 of the
Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999, Pub. L. 105–
277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub.
L. 104–121) (SBREFA) provides
generally for congressional review of
agency rules. A reporting requirement is
triggered in instances where NCUA
issues a final rule as defined by Section
551 of the APA. 5 U.S.C. 551. NCUA
does not believe this interim final rule
is a ‘‘major rule’’ within the meaning of
the relevant sections of SBREFA. NCUA
has submitted the rule to the Office of
Management and Budget for its
determination in that regard.
Agency Regulatory Goal
NCUA’s goal is to promulgate clear
and understandable regulations that
impose minimal regulatory burden. We
request your comments on whether this
rule is understandable and minimally
intrusive.
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 745
Credit unions, Share insurance.
8 Id.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board, this 3rd day of
October 2008.
Paul Peterson,
Acting Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons discussed above,
NCUA amends 12 CFR part 745 as
follows:
■
PART 745—SHARE INSURANCE AND
APPENDIX
1. The authority citation for part 745
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1757, 1765,
1766, 1781, 1782, 1787, 1789.
2. Section 745.4 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 745.4
Revocable trust accounts.
(a) General rule. Except as provided in
paragraph (e) of this section, the funds
owned by a member and deposited into
one or more accounts with respect to
which the owner evidences an intention
that upon his or her death the funds
shall belong to one or more beneficiaries
shall be separately insured from other
types of accounts the owner has at the
same NCUA-insured credit union in an
amount equal to the total number of
different beneficiaries named in the
account(s) multiplied by the SMSIA.
This section applies to all accounts held
in connection with informal and formal
testamentary revocable trusts. Such
informal trusts are commonly referred to
as payable-on-death accounts, in-trustfor accounts or Totten Trust accounts,
and such formal trusts are commonly
referred to as living trusts or family
trusts. Example 1: A member has a
living trust account with four
beneficiaries named in the trust. The
account owner has no other revocable
trust accounts at the same NCUAinsured credit union. The maximum
insurance coverage would be $400,000,
determined by multiplying 4 (the
number of beneficiaries) times $100,000
(the current SMSIA). Example 2: A
member has a payable-on-death account
naming his niece and cousin as
beneficiaries and, at the same NCUAinsured credit union, has another
payable-on-death account naming the
same niece and a friend as beneficiaries.
The maximum coverage available to the
account owner would be $300,000. This
is because the account owner has named
three different beneficiaries in the
revocable trust accounts. The naming of
the same beneficiary in more than one
revocable trust account, whether a
payable-on-death account or living trust
account, does not increase the total
coverage amount.
(b) Required intention. The required
intention in paragraph (a) of this section
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
that upon the owner’s death the funds
shall belong to one or more beneficiaries
must be manifested in the title of the
account or elsewhere in the account
records of the credit union using
commonly accepted terms such as, but
not limited to, in trust for, as trustee for,
payable-on-death to, or any acronym
therefore, or by listing one or more
beneficiaries in the account records of
the credit union. In addition, for
informal revocable trust accounts, the
beneficiaries must be specifically named
in the account records of the credit
union. The settlor of a revocable trust
shall be presumed to own the funds
deposited into the account.
(c) Definition of beneficiary. For
purposes of this section, a beneficiary
includes natural persons as well as
charitable organizations and other nonprofit entities recognized as such under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(d) Interests of beneficiaries outside
the definition of beneficiary in this
section. If a beneficiary named in a trust
covered by this section does not meet
the definition of beneficiary in
paragraph (c) of this section, the funds
corresponding to that beneficiary shall
be treated as the individually owned
(single ownership) funds of the
owner(s). As such, they shall be
aggregated with any other single
ownership accounts of such owner(s)
and insured up to the SMSIA per owner.
Example: if a member establishes an
account payable-on-death to a pet, the
account would be insured as a singleownership account.
(e) Revocable trust accounts with
aggregate balances exceeding five times
the SMSIA and naming more than five
different beneficiaries. Notwithstanding
the general coverage provisions in
paragraph (a) of this section, for funds
owned by a member in one or more
revocable trust accounts naming more
than five different beneficiaries and
whose aggregate balance is more than
five times the SMSIA, the maximum
revocable trust account coverage for the
account owner shall be the greater of
either: five times the SMSIA or the
aggregate amount of the ownership
interests of each different beneficiary
named in the trusts, to a limit of the
SMSIA per different beneficiary.
Example: A has a living trust account
with a balance of $600,000. Under the
terms of the trust, upon A’s death, A’s
three children are each entitled to
$50,000, A’s friend is entitled to $5,000
and a designated charity is entitled to
$70,000. The trust also provides that the
remainder of the trust assets shall
belong to A’s spouse. In this case,
because the balance of the account is
over $500,000, which is five times the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
current SMSIA of $100,000, and there
are more than five different beneficiaries
named in the trust, the maximum
coverage available to A would be the
greater of: $500,000 or the aggregate of
each different beneficiary’s interest to a
limit of $100,000 per beneficiary. The
beneficial interests in the trust
considered for purposes of determining
coverage are: $50,000 for each of the
children (totaling $150,000), $5,000 for
the friend, $70,000 for the charity, and
$100,000 for the spouse ($375,000,
subject to the $100,000 limit per
beneficiary). The aggregate beneficial
interests, thus, are $325,000. Hence, the
maximum coverage afforded to the
account owner would be $500,000, the
greater of $500,000 or $325,000.)
(f) Joint revocable trust accounts. (1)
Where an account described in
paragraph (a) of this section is
established by more than one owner, the
respective interest of each account
owner (which shall be deemed equal)
shall be insured separately, per different
beneficiary, up to the SMSIA, subject to
the limitation imposed in paragraph (e)
of this section. Example 1: A and B, two
individuals, establish a payable-ondeath account naming their three nieces
as beneficiaries. Neither A nor B has any
other revocable trust accounts at the
same NCUA-insured credit union. The
maximum coverage afforded to A and B
would be $600,000, determined by
multiplying the number of owners (2)
times the SMSIA (currently $100,000)
times the number of different
beneficiaries (3). In this example, A
would be entitled to revocable trust
coverage of $300,000 and B would be
entitled to revocable trust coverage of
$300,000. Example 2: A and B, two
individuals, establish a payable-ondeath account naming their two
children, two cousins and a charity as
beneficiaries. The balance in the
account is $700,000. Neither A nor B
has any other revocable trust accounts at
the same NCUA-insured credit union.
The maximum coverage would be
determined under paragraph (a) of this
section by multiplying the number of
account owners (2) times the number of
different beneficiaries (5) times
$100,000, or $1 million. Because the
account balance is less than the
maximum coverage amount, the account
would be fully insured.
Example 3: A and B, two individuals,
establish a living trust account with a
balance of $1.5 million. Under the terms
of the trust, upon the death of both A
and B, each of A’s and B’s three
children is entitled to $200,000, B’s
cousin is entitled to $150,000, A’s friend
is entitled to $30,000, and the remaining
amount ($720,000) goes to a charity.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60621
Under paragraph (e) of this section, the
maximum coverage, as to each joint
account owner, would be the greater of
$500,000 or the aggregate amount (as to
each joint owner) of the interest of each
different beneficiary named in the trust,
to a limit of $100,000 per account owner
per beneficiary. The beneficial interests
in the trust considered for purposes of
determining coverage for account owner
A are: $300,000 for the children (three
times $100,000), $75,000 for the cousin,
$15,000 for the friend, and $100,000 for
the charity ($360,000 subject to the
$100,000 per-beneficiary limitation). As
to A, the aggregate amount of the
beneficial interests eligible for share
insurance coverage is $490,000. Hence,
the maximum coverage afforded to joint
account owner A would be $500,000,
the greater of $500,000 or $490,000 (the
aggregate of all the beneficial interests
attributable to A, limited to $100,000
per beneficiary). The same analysis and
coverage determination also would
apply to B.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (f)(1)
of this section, where the owners of a
joint revocable trust account are
themselves the sole beneficiaries of the
corresponding trust, the account shall
be insured as a joint account under
section 745.8 and shall not be insured
under the provisions of this section.
Example: If A and B establish a payableon-death account naming themselves as
the sole beneficiaries of the account, the
account will be insured as a joint
account because the account does not
satisfy the intent requirement under
paragraph (a) of this section that the
funds in the account belong to the
named beneficiaries upon the owners’
death. The beneficiaries are in fact the
actual owners of the funds during the
account owners’ lifetimes.
(g) For accounts held in connection
with a living trust that provides for a
life-estate interest for designated
beneficiaries, NCUA shall value each
such life estate interest as the SMSIA for
purposes of determining the insurance
coverage available to the account owner.
(h) Revocable trusts that become
irrevocable trusts. Notwithstanding the
provisions in section 745.9–1 on the
insurance coverage of irrevocable trust
accounts, a revocable trust account shall
continue to be insured under the
provisions of this section even if the
corresponding revocable trust, upon the
death of one or more of the owners
thereof, converts, in part or entirely, to
an irrevocable trust. Example: Assume
A and B have a trust account in
connection with a living trust, of which
they are joint grantors. If upon the death
of either A or B the trust transforms into
an irrevocable trust as to the deceased
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
60622
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 14, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
grantor’s ownership in the trust, the
account will continue to be insured
under the provisions of this section.
(i) This section shall be effective as of
October 14, 2008 for all existing and
future revocable trust accounts and for
existing and future irrevocable trust
accounts resulting from formal
revocable trust accounts.
Appendix to Part 745—[Amended]
3. The appendix to part 745 is
amended by removing Section B and by
redesignating Sections C through G as B
through F respectively.
■
[FR Doc. E8–23922 Filed 10–10–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
The Direct Final Rule Procedure
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0983; Airspace
Docket No. 08–ASO–14]
Modification of Class D Airspace;
MacDill AFB, FL
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule, request for
comments.
ebenthall on PROD1PC60 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action modifies Class D
Airspace at MacDill AFB, FL. The
MacDill AFB Air Traffic Control Tower
no longer operates on a full time basis;
therefore, the Class D Airspace
associated with the tower operations
must be modified to reflect the times
when the controlled airspace is
effective. This action enhances the
National Airspace System by relaxing
the restrictions to the controlled
airspace areas in the vicinity of MacDill
AFB, FL.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, January 15,
2009. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under title 1, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to
the annual revision of FAA Order
7400.9 and publication of conforming
amendments. Comments for inclusion
in the Rules Docket must be received on
or before November 28, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule
to: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800–
647–5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You
must identify the Docket Number FAA–
2008–0983; Airspace Docket No. 08–
ASO–14, at the beginning of your
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:35 Oct 10, 2008
Jkt 217001
comments. You may also submit and
review received comments through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the rule, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays. An informal docket
may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, Room 210, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melinda Giddens, Operations Support
Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, P.O. Box 20636,
Atlanta, Georgia 30320; Telephone (404)
305–5610, Fax 404–305–5572.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FAA anticipates that this
regulation will not result in adverse or
negative comments, and, therefore,
issues it as a direct final rule. The FAA
has determined that this rule only
involves an established body of
technical regulations for which frequent
and routine amendments are necessary
to keep them operationally current.
Unless a written adverse or negative
comment or a written notice of intent to
submit an adverse or negative comment
is received within the comment period,
the regulation will become effective on
the date specified above. After the close
of the comment period, the FAA will
publish a document in the Federal
Register indicating that no adverse or
negative comments were received and
confirming the effective date. If the FAA
receives, within the comment period, an
adverse or negative comment, or written
notice of intent to submit such a
comment, a document withdrawing the
direct final rule will be published in the
Federal Register, and a notice of
proposed rulemaking may be published
with a new comment period.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of
a direct final rule, and was not preceded
by a notice of proposed rulemaking,
interested persons are invited to
comment on this rule by submitting
such written data, views, or arguments
as they may desire. The direct final rule
is used in this case to facilitate the
timing of the charting schedule and
enhance the operation at the airport,
while still allowing and requesting
public comment on this rulemaking
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
action. An electronic copy of this
document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov. Communications
should identify both docket numbers
and be submitted in triplicate to the
address specified under the caption
ADDRESSES above or through the Web
site. All communications received on or
before the closing date for comments
will be considered, and this rule may be
amended or withdrawn in light of the
comments received. Recently published
rulemaking documents can also be
accessed through the FAA’s Web page at
https://www.faa.gov or the Federal
Register’s Web page at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
Comments are specifically invited on
the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the rule that might suggest a need to
modify the rule. Factual information
that supports the commenter’s ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in
evaluating the effectiveness of this
action and determining whether
additional rulemaking action would be
needed. All comments submitted will be
available, both before and after the
closing date for comments, in the Rules
Docket for examination by interested
persons. Those wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this rule must
submit a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2008–0983; Airspace
Docket No. 08–ASO–14.’’ The postcard
will be date stamped and returned to the
commenter.
The Rule
This amendment to Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71
modifies Class D airspace at MacDill
AFB, FL, by adding to the description of
the controlled airspace area the hours of
operation of the Air Traffic Control
Tower (ATCT) at MacDill AFB. The
ATCT at MacDill AFB operates on an
other than full-time basis and, therefore,
the Class D Airspace associated with the
tower operations must be modified to
reflect the times when the controlled
airspace is effective. Controlled airspace
extending upward from the surface of
the Earth is required to encompass the
airspace necessary for instrument
approaches for aircraft operating under
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR). The
current Class D airspace areas are
sufficient for these approaches, so no
additional controlled airspace must be
defined. Effective times for the MacDill
AFB Class D airspace areas will be
published first by Notice to Airman, and
then thereafter published continuously
E:\FR\FM\14OCR1.SGM
14OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 14, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60616-60622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23922]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 745
RIN 3133-AD54
Share Insurance for Revocable Trust Accounts
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NCUA is amending its share insurance rules to simplify
coverage for revocable trust accounts. The amendments will make the
rules easier to understand and apply without decreasing coverage,
result in faster share insurance determinations in the event of a
credit union closing, and help improve public confidence in the credit
union system. The amendments eliminate the concept of ``qualifying
beneficiaries.'' Also, for members with revocable trust accounts
totaling no more than $500,000, coverage will be determined without
regard to the proportional beneficial interest of each beneficiary in
the trust.
Under the amended rules, a trust account owner with up to five
different beneficiaries named in all of his or her revocable trust
accounts at one NCUA-insured institution will be insured up to $100,000
per beneficiary. Revocable trust account owners with more than $500,000
and more than five different beneficiaries named in the trust(s) will
be insured for the greater of either: $500,000 or the aggregate amount
of all the beneficiaries' interests in the trust(s), limited to
$100,000 per beneficiary.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 14, 2008. Written comments
must be received on or before December 15, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(Please send comments by one method only):
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
NCUA Web Site: https://www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Address to regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ``[Your
name] Comments on Share Insurance for Revocable Trust Accounts'' in the
e-mail subject line.
Fax: (703) 518-6319. Use the subject line described above
for e-mail.
Mail: Address to Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314-3428.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail address.
Public Inspection: All public comments are available on the
agency's Web site at https://www.ncua.gov/RegulationsOpinionsLaws/
comments as submitted, except as may not be possible for technical
reasons. Public comments will not be edited to remove
[[Page 60617]]
any identifying or contact information. Paper copies of comments may be
inspected in NCUA's law library at 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314, by appointment weekdays between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. To
make an appointment, call (703) 518-6546 or send an e-mail to
OGCMail@ncua.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Kressman, Staff Attorney, at the
above address, or telephone: (703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I.
A. Background
NCUA insures member share accounts in all federally-chartered
credit unions and the vast majority of state-chartered credit unions.
This accounts for approximately 98% of all credit unions in the United
States. Despite NCUA's best efforts to provide clear information on
insurance coverage for revocable trust accounts and recent rule changes
to simplify that determination, NCUA recognizes there is still
significant public and industry confusion about the insurance coverage
of revocable trust accounts. See NCUA Web site at https://www.ncua.gov/
ShareInsurance/index.htm; 68 FR 75111 (December 30, 2003); 69 FR 8798
(February 26, 2004). This is evidenced by the great volume of share
insurance inquiries NCUA has received as a result of recent events in
the financial markets and is particularly true of living trust
accounts, one of the two types of revocable trust accounts NCUA
insures. This is largely due to the increasingly complex nature of
living trusts.\1\ NCUA believes the amendments in this interim rule
will further clarify how revocable trust accounts are covered, enhance
NCUA's ability to help maintain public confidence and stability in the
credit union system, and protect insured members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because of the complexities of living trusts, NCUA's
insurance determinations on those accounts could be time consuming
and delay members receiving their insured account proceeds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Current Share Insurance Rules for Revocable Trust Accounts
NCUA insures informal and formal revocable trust accounts under its
share insurance rules. 12 CFR Part 745. Informal trust accounts are
comprised simply of a signature card on which the member designates the
beneficiaries to whom the funds in the account will pass upon the
member's death. These are the most common type of revocable trust
accounts and generally are referred to as ``payable-on-death'' (POD)
accounts or in-trust-for (ITF) accounts or Totten Trust accounts.
Throughout this preamble, NCUA will refer to all informal trust
accounts as POD accounts. Formal revocable trust accounts are
established in connection with a formal written revocable trust
document. They are increasingly popular trusts created for estate
planning purposes and are often referred to as: Living trusts, family
trusts, marital trusts, survivor's trusts, by-pass trusts, generation-
skipping trusts, AB trusts or special needs trusts. Throughout this
preamble, NCUA will refer to all formal revocable trusts as living
trusts. Like an informal revocable trust, a living trust is created by
a member, also known as a grantor or settlor, over which the member as
owner retains control during his or her lifetime. Upon the owner's
death, the trust generally becomes irrevocable. NCUA insures POD and
living trust accounts under Sec. 745.4 of its share insurance rules.
12 CFR 745.4.
NCUA's rules provide that all revocable trust accounts (both POD
accounts and living trust accounts) are insured up to $100,000 per
``qualifying beneficiary'' designated by the owner of the account. Id.
If there are multiple owners of a revocable trust account, coverage is
available separately for each owner, per qualifying beneficiary as to
each owner. Qualifying beneficiaries are defined as the owner's spouse,
children, grandchildren, parents and siblings. 12 CFR 745.4(b).
The per-qualifying beneficiary coverage available on revocable
trust accounts is separate from the insurance coverage afforded to
members in connection with other accounts they own in other ownership
capacities at the same NCUA-insured credit union. For example, if a
member has a single-ownership account with a balance of $100,000 and a
POD account (naming at least one qualifying beneficiary) with a balance
of $100,000 at the same NCUA-insured credit union, both accounts would
be insured separately for a combined coverage amount of $200,000.
Under our current rules, separate, per-beneficiary insurance
coverage is available for revocable trust accounts only if the account
satisfies certain requirements including: (1) The account must evidence
the owner's intent that the funds shall belong to the designated
beneficiaries upon the owner's death; (2) each beneficiary must be a
qualifying beneficiary; and (3) for POD accounts, the beneficiaries
must be specifically named in the account records of the credit union.
Under the current rules, the beneficiaries of a living trust need not
be indicated in the credit union's records. 12 CFR 745.4(e).
If a revocable trust account owner names one or more non-qualifying
beneficiaries in the account or trust, the funds corresponding to those
non-qualifying beneficiaries are considered the single-ownership funds
of the owner and insured under that category of coverage. For example,
assume a member owns a POD account (and no other accounts at the same
credit union) that names his spouse and a friend as beneficiaries. The
account has a balance of $200,000. The coverage would be $100,000 under
the revocable trust coverage rules because he has named one qualifying
beneficiary, and $100,000 would be insured under the single-ownership
coverage rules because the funds attributable to the non-qualifying
beneficiary (the friend) would be considered the owner's single-
ownership funds and thus insured under that category of ownership. If
the account owner in this example also had a single-ownership account
with a balance of $50,000, then the $100,000 (attributable to the non-
qualifying beneficiary) from his POD account would be added to the
$50,000 held in the single-ownership account and insured to a limit of
$100,000. Thus, $50,000 would be uninsured.
As discussed above, both POD accounts and living trust accounts are
types of revocable trust accounts insured under the revocable trust
account category in NCUA's share insurance rules. Consequently, all
funds that a member holds in living trust accounts and POD accounts
naming the same beneficiaries are aggregated for insurance purposes and
insured to the applicable coverage limits. For example, if a member has
a living trust account for $200,000 naming his children, A and B, and
also has a $200,000 POD account naming A and B, the combined coverage
on the two aggregated accounts would be $200,000 in total, not $200,000
per account.
II. The Interim Rule
A. Overview
In this rulemaking, NCUA seeks to make the insurance coverage rules
for revocable trust accounts easy to understand and apply, without
decreasing coverage currently available for revocable trust account
owners, and retain reasonable limitations on coverage levels for
revocable trust account owners. Under the interim rule, a trust account
owner with up to $500,000 in revocable trust accounts at one NCUA-
insured institution is insured up to $100,000 per beneficiary. NCUA
believes this is the scenario that will apply to the vast majority of
[[Page 60618]]
revocable trust account owners. Revocable trust account owners with
more than $500,000 in those accounts and more than five different
beneficiaries named in the trust(s) are insured differently. They will
be insured for the greater of either: $500,000 or the aggregate amount
of all the beneficiaries' interests in the trust(s), limited to
$100,000 per beneficiary. Under the interim final rule, coverage is
based on the existence of any beneficiary named in the revocable trust,
as long as the beneficiary is a natural person, or a charity or other
non-profit organization. If in establishing a POD account, the owner
names a living trust as the beneficiary, we will consider the
beneficiaries of the trust to be the beneficiaries of the POD account.
As discussed below, under the interim rule the concept of ``qualifying
beneficiaries'' is eliminated. For an account owner with combined
revocable trust account balances of $500,000 or less, the maximum
available coverage would be determined simply by multiplying the number
of beneficiaries by $100,000.
A living trust account with a balance of $400,000, for example,
would be insured for up to $400,000 as long as there are at least four
beneficiaries named in the trust.\2\ Different proportional ownership
interests of the beneficiaries in the trust assets would not affect the
share insurance coverage. So, in this example, the maximum coverage
would be $400,000 even if the trust provided that beneficiaries A and B
are entitled to twenty percent each of the trust assets and
beneficiaries C and D are entitled to thirty percent each of the trust
assets. As under the current rules, however, a member would receive a
combined maximum coverage amount of $100,000 for the same beneficiary
named in more than one revocable trust account he or she owns at one
credit union. For example, if a member has a POD account naming her son
as a beneficiary and a living trust account at the same credit union
naming the same son as a beneficiary, the member would be entitled to
no more than $100,000 with respect to having named her son a
beneficiary of her revocable trust accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This assumes the account owner has no other revocable trust
accounts at the same credit union.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Eliminating the Concept of ``Qualifying Beneficiaries''
As explained above, previous revocable trust account coverage was
based, in large part, on the number of qualifying beneficiaries named
in the trust(s). In the most recent revocable trust account rule
amended by this interim final rule, qualifying beneficiaries were
defined as the revocable trust account owner's spouse, children,
grandchildren, parents and siblings. 12 CFR 745.4(b). In previous
versions of that rule, the definition included only the owner's spouse,
children and grandchildren. The rationale for expanding the definition
of qualifying beneficiaries to include the account owner's parents and
siblings was to recognize other family members likely to be named in a
person's revocable trust(s).
Before and since the expansion of the definition of qualifying
beneficiaries, members and industry participants have questioned the
fairness of limiting the coverage on revocable trust accounts to only
certain beneficiaries. Many have stated the definition of qualifying
beneficiaries should include, among others, an account holder's nieces
and nephews, in-laws, great-grandchildren, cousins, friends and
charities. Historically, in response to these complaints, NCUA has
taken the position that there must be a reasonable limitation of the
amount of coverage available on revocable trust accounts, otherwise,
there would be potentially unlimited coverage under this account
category. Accordingly, NCUA has been reluctant to amend the rules to
provide coverage for any beneficiary(ies) named in a revocable trust
without limitation. Under the interim rule, however, the NCUA believes
that it can achieve greater fairness under the revocable trust rules by
basing coverage on the naming of any beneficiary in a revocable trust,
but concurrently imposing the coverage qualifications discussed below
on accounts over $500,000.
In addition to addressing the fairness issue, eliminating the
concept of ``qualifying beneficiaries'' makes the coverage rules easier
to understand. Members and credit unions no longer need to know who is
a qualifying beneficiary and who is not. Also, this revision will
obviate the need for NCUA claims agents, upon a credit union's failure
to confirm that a beneficiary named in a revocable trust account is a
``qualifying beneficiary.'' Thus, under the interim rule, the NCUA
anticipates being able to make quicker share insurance determinations
on revocable trust accounts, if necessary.
C. Accounts With Aggregate Balances of $500,000 or Less; Determining
Coverage Without the Necessity of Discerning Each Beneficiary's
Interest in the Trust(s)
Previously, one of the most complex and confusing aspects of
determining revocable trust account coverage was having to discern and
consider unequal beneficial interests in revocable trusts. This issue
typically arises in the context of a living trust that, for example,
provides either varying lump-sum payments for designated beneficiaries
or different percentage interests in trust assets to certain
beneficiaries, or different ``remainder'' interests in the assets to
the same or other beneficiaries. The method for determining coverage in
some situations involving unequal beneficial interests necessitates the
formulation and solving of simultaneous equations. Credit unions and
members alike find applying these equations far too complex. NCUA
agrees. Accordingly, a key component of the interim rule is the ability
to determine coverage available to account owners without regard to
unequal interests of the beneficiaries named in the revocable trust(s).
NCUA believes this rule change, coupled with the recognition of all
beneficiaries, will make the revocable trust account rules simpler and
more transparent.
D. Retaining Current Coverage Levels for Revocable Trust Accounts With
More Than $500,000 and More Than Five Beneficiaries Named in the
Trust(s)
NCUA believes the vast majority of revocable trust account owners
have less than $500,000 in revocable trust accounts at one NCUA-insured
institution. In this scenario, under the interim rule, coverage for an
account owner's revocable trust accounts will be determined simply by
multiplying the number of different beneficiaries named in the trust(s)
by $100,000.
To set reasonable limits on the maximum coverage available to
revocable trust account owners and also retain the coverage levels
available to revocable trust account owners under previous rules, the
interim rule provides special treatment for members with revocable
trust accounts over $500,000 naming more than five beneficiaries. Under
the interim rule, revocable trust account owners with more than
$500,000 and more than five beneficiaries named in the trusts are
insured for the greater of either: $500,000 or the aggregate amount of
all the beneficiaries' interests in the trust(s), limited to $100,000
per beneficiary. This coverage is no less than the coverage afforded to
such account owners under previous rules, particularly because under
the interim rule the coverage is based on the number of beneficiaries,
not the number of qualifying beneficiaries. Also, as discussed below,
under the interim rule, life-estate interest holders are deemed to
[[Page 60619]]
have a $100,000 interest in the trust assets.
For example, assume a member has a living trust account that
provides a life estate interest for the member's spouse, $15,000 for
his college alma mater, $5,000 for each of three brothers and the
remaining amount to his friend. The balance in the account is $600,000.
The analysis begins with recognizing the account balance exceeds
$500,000 and the number of beneficiaries exceeds five. Accordingly,
under the interim rule, the maximum coverage would be the greater of
either: $500,000 or the aggregate beneficial interests of all the
beneficiaries (up to a limit of $100,000 per beneficiary). The
beneficial interests are: $100,000 for the spouse's life estate
interest, $15,000 for the college, $5,000 for each brother (totaling
$15,000), and $100,000 for the friend (because of the per-beneficiary
limitation of $100,000). The total beneficial interests, therefore, are
$230,000. Hence, the maximum coverage afforded to the account owner
would be $500,000, the greater of $500,000 or $230,000.
NCUA believes basing the coverage of trust accounts in excess of
$500,000 with more than five different beneficiaries, on the ownership
interest of each beneficiary named in the applicable trust(s) would
prevent the potential of having to provide unlimited coverage with
respect to revocable trust accounts. Without such a limitation, a
member could name a limitless number of beneficiaries each with a
nominal interest in the trust and obtain coverage up to $100,000 for
naming each such beneficiary. For example, a revocable trust account
held in connection with a trust entitling one beneficiary to $1 million
and entitling each of nine other beneficiaries to $1 would be insured
for $1 million, without the limitation discussed above being imposed as
part of the interim rule.
E. Treatment of Life-Estate Interests
Another complicating factor in determining the coverage for living
trust accounts is determining the value of life estate interests. A
life estate interest usually means the life-estate beneficiary is
entitled to the income on the trust assets during his or her lifetime.
A large percentage of living trusts provide a life estate interest for
one or more beneficiaries. The most typical situation is where a
married person creates a trust providing a life estate interest for his
or her surviving spouse and a remainder interest for their children.
NCUA's previous rules provide that, in such situations, each life-
estate holder and each remainder-man (also known as residuary
beneficiaries) is deemed to have an equal interest in the trust assets
for account insurance purposes. 12 CFR 745.4(e). This rule has proven
difficult to apply, especially where the living trust provides for
lump-sum gifts for certain beneficiaries, life estate interests for
others and different percentage interests for the remainder-men, who
may be the same as or different from the other beneficiaries. To
simplify the coverage rules, the interim rule revises the previous
valuation method for life estate interests by deeming each such
interest to be $100,000, for purposes of determining deposit insurance
coverage. The example above, involving a trust providing for a spousal
life estate interest and bequests to the owner's college alma mater,
brothers and friend, demonstrates how the interim rule would apply to a
living trust providing for a life-estate interest.
F. Treatment of Irrevocable Trusts Springing From a Revocable Trust
Another complexity in determining coverage for living trust
accounts is that, when it is created, a living trust is a revocable
trust but, when the owner dies, the trust becomes irrevocable.\3\ At
that stage in the lifecycle of the living trust, the funds
corresponding to the irrevocable trust are insured under NCUA's rules
for irrevocable trust accounts.\4\ Under those rules, coverage is based
on the non-contingent interest of each beneficiary named in the trust.
In effect, when a living trust evolves from a revocable trust to an
irrevocable trust the insurance coverage available on the account is
based on a different set of rules, the irrevocable trust account rules.
As such, the coverage on the account often decreases from what it had
been when the trust was insured solely under the revocable trust rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For jointly-owned living trusts, upon the death of one of
the owners, typically part of the trust remains revocable and part
becomes irrevocable.
\4\ 12 CFR 745.9-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To eliminate this complexity and the confusion it generates, the
interim final rule provides that the methods for determining the
coverage of the living trust account will remain the same when the
trust (or part of the trust) converts to an irrevocable trust. For
example, a grantor has a living trust account naming three
beneficiaries, each of whom receives a specified share of the trust
assets if he or she graduates from college by age 25. Under the
previous insurance rules, when the grantor is alive (meaning that the
trust is still a revocable trust) the maximum coverage on the account
is $300,000--one grantor times three beneficiaries times $100,000. Also
under the previous rules, upon the grantor's death (allowing for the
six-month grace period during which coverage would remain the same),
the coverage reduces to $100,000 (if none of the beneficiaries has
graduated from college yet) because of the contingent nature of the
beneficial interests provided for in the trust. Under the interim rule,
contingencies would continue to be irrelevant for coverage purposes
after the grantor's death, even though the trust has evolved into an
irrevocable trust. In this example, under the interim rule the coverage
would still be up to $300,000.
NCUA believes the continuity of coverage provided for under this
component of the interim rule will greatly simplify previous methods
for determining coverage for living trust accounts. It is important to
note, however, that under the interim rule the coverage on a living
trust account could still change during the lifecycle of the trust. For
example, when both grantors in a co-grantor trust are alive, the
maximum coverage on the account would be $1,000,000, because the
formula for determining coverage would be: two grantors times five
beneficiaries times $100,000.\5\ If one of the grantors dies, then the
maximum coverage would be one grantor times five beneficiaries times
$100,000.\6\ Coverage would likewise decrease if one or more of the
beneficiaries named in the revocable trust died, assuming the death of
the beneficiary(ies) would cause the total number of beneficiaries to
drop below five.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ This assumes neither grantor has any other revocable trust
accounts at the same insured institution.
\6\ Of course, NCUA's rules provide for a six-month grace period
after the death of a member during which the coverage would be the
same as if the member (grantor) were still alive. 12 CFR 745.2(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
G. Effective Date of the Interim Rule
The interim rule is effective on October 3, 2008, the date on which
the NCUA Board approved the interim rule by notation vote. 12 CFR
791.4. It is also the date this interim rule was filed for public
inspection with the Office of the Federal Register. In this regard,
NCUA invokes the ``good cause'' exception to the requirements in the
Administrative Procedure Act \7\ (APA) that, before a rulemaking can be
finalized, it must first be issued for public comment and, once
finalized, must have a delayed effective date of thirty days from the
publication date. NCUA believes good cause exists for making the
interim rule effective immediately because, based on recent experience,
it is clear that many members and credit unions do not fully
[[Page 60620]]
understand the insurance rules for revocable trust accounts. Also, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has recently issued an almost
identical interim rule and it is important for NCUA to do the same
immediately to maintain parity between the nation's two federal
deposit/share insurance programs. The interim rule simplifies the
coverage rules for revocable trust accounts and, therefore, will
provide greater certainty to members and credit unions as to how and to
what extent revocable trust accounts are insured.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 5 U.S.C. 553.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Importantly, under the interim rule, no member will be insured for
an amount less than he or she would have been entitled to under the
previous revocable trust account rules. Some members will be entitled
to greater coverage under the interim rule than under previous rules,
especially because the interim rule eliminates the requirement that a
beneficiary be a ``qualifying beneficiary'' for the account owner to be
insured on a per-beneficiary basis. Moreover, NCUA believes the interim
final rule will result in faster share insurance determinations after a
credit union closing and will help improve public confidence in the
credit union system.
For these reasons, NCUA has determined that the public notice and
participation that ordinarily are required by the APA before a
regulation may take effect would, in this case, be contrary to the
public interest and that good cause exists for waiving the customary
30-day delayed effective date.\8\ Nevertheless, NCUA desires to have
the benefit of public comment before adopting a permanent final rule
and invites interested parties to submit comments during a 60-day
comment period. In adopting the final regulation, NCUA will revise the
interim final rule, if appropriate, in light of the comments received.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Request for Comments
NCUA requests comments on all aspects of the proposed rulemaking
including comments on: (1) Whether ``over $500,000'' is the proper
threshold for determining coverage for revocable trust account owners
based on the beneficial interests of the trust beneficiaries; (2)
whether NCUA's irrevocable trust account rules, 12 CFR 745.9-1, should
be revised so that all trusts are covered by substantially the same
rules; and (3) what effect the interim rule will have on the level of
insured shares.
IV. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires NCUA to prepare an analysis
to describe any significant economic impact a rule may have on a
substantial number of small entities (primarily those under ten million
dollars in assets). This interim final rule simplifies and clarifies
certain share insurance coverages. Accordingly, it will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small credit
unions, and therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
NCUA has determined that this rule will not increase paperwork
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and regulations
of the Office of Management and Budget.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
NCUA has determined that this rule will not affect family well-
being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681
(1998).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(Pub. L. 104-121) (SBREFA) provides generally for congressional review
of agency rules. A reporting requirement is triggered in instances
where NCUA issues a final rule as defined by Section 551 of the APA. 5
U.S.C. 551. NCUA does not believe this interim final rule is a ``major
rule'' within the meaning of the relevant sections of SBREFA. NCUA has
submitted the rule to the Office of Management and Budget for its
determination in that regard.
Agency Regulatory Goal
NCUA's goal is to promulgate clear and understandable regulations
that impose minimal regulatory burden. We request your comments on
whether this rule is understandable and minimally intrusive.
List of Subjects
12 CFR Part 745
Credit unions, Share insurance.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board, this 3rd day
of October 2008.
Paul Peterson,
Acting Secretary of the Board.
0
For the reasons discussed above, NCUA amends 12 CFR part 745 as
follows:
PART 745--SHARE INSURANCE AND APPENDIX
0
1. The authority citation for part 745 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1757, 1765, 1766, 1781, 1782,
1787, 1789.
0
2. Section 745.4 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 745.4 Revocable trust accounts.
(a) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this
section, the funds owned by a member and deposited into one or more
accounts with respect to which the owner evidences an intention that
upon his or her death the funds shall belong to one or more
beneficiaries shall be separately insured from other types of accounts
the owner has at the same NCUA-insured credit union in an amount equal
to the total number of different beneficiaries named in the account(s)
multiplied by the SMSIA. This section applies to all accounts held in
connection with informal and formal testamentary revocable trusts. Such
informal trusts are commonly referred to as payable-on-death accounts,
in-trust-for accounts or Totten Trust accounts, and such formal trusts
are commonly referred to as living trusts or family trusts. Example 1:
A member has a living trust account with four beneficiaries named in
the trust. The account owner has no other revocable trust accounts at
the same NCUA-insured credit union. The maximum insurance coverage
would be $400,000, determined by multiplying 4 (the number of
beneficiaries) times $100,000 (the current SMSIA). Example 2: A member
has a payable-on-death account naming his niece and cousin as
beneficiaries and, at the same NCUA-insured credit union, has another
payable-on-death account naming the same niece and a friend as
beneficiaries. The maximum coverage available to the account owner
would be $300,000. This is because the account owner has named three
different beneficiaries in the revocable trust accounts. The naming of
the same beneficiary in more than one revocable trust account, whether
a payable-on-death account or living trust account, does not increase
the total coverage amount.
(b) Required intention. The required intention in paragraph (a) of
this section
[[Page 60621]]
that upon the owner's death the funds shall belong to one or more
beneficiaries must be manifested in the title of the account or
elsewhere in the account records of the credit union using commonly
accepted terms such as, but not limited to, in trust for, as trustee
for, payable-on-death to, or any acronym therefore, or by listing one
or more beneficiaries in the account records of the credit union. In
addition, for informal revocable trust accounts, the beneficiaries must
be specifically named in the account records of the credit union. The
settlor of a revocable trust shall be presumed to own the funds
deposited into the account.
(c) Definition of beneficiary. For purposes of this section, a
beneficiary includes natural persons as well as charitable
organizations and other non-profit entities recognized as such under
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(d) Interests of beneficiaries outside the definition of
beneficiary in this section. If a beneficiary named in a trust covered
by this section does not meet the definition of beneficiary in
paragraph (c) of this section, the funds corresponding to that
beneficiary shall be treated as the individually owned (single
ownership) funds of the owner(s). As such, they shall be aggregated
with any other single ownership accounts of such owner(s) and insured
up to the SMSIA per owner. Example: if a member establishes an account
payable-on-death to a pet, the account would be insured as a single-
ownership account.
(e) Revocable trust accounts with aggregate balances exceeding five
times the SMSIA and naming more than five different beneficiaries.
Notwithstanding the general coverage provisions in paragraph (a) of
this section, for funds owned by a member in one or more revocable
trust accounts naming more than five different beneficiaries and whose
aggregate balance is more than five times the SMSIA, the maximum
revocable trust account coverage for the account owner shall be the
greater of either: five times the SMSIA or the aggregate amount of the
ownership interests of each different beneficiary named in the trusts,
to a limit of the SMSIA per different beneficiary. Example: A has a
living trust account with a balance of $600,000. Under the terms of the
trust, upon A's death, A's three children are each entitled to $50,000,
A's friend is entitled to $5,000 and a designated charity is entitled
to $70,000. The trust also provides that the remainder of the trust
assets shall belong to A's spouse. In this case, because the balance of
the account is over $500,000, which is five times the current SMSIA of
$100,000, and there are more than five different beneficiaries named in
the trust, the maximum coverage available to A would be the greater of:
$500,000 or the aggregate of each different beneficiary's interest to a
limit of $100,000 per beneficiary. The beneficial interests in the
trust considered for purposes of determining coverage are: $50,000 for
each of the children (totaling $150,000), $5,000 for the friend,
$70,000 for the charity, and $100,000 for the spouse ($375,000, subject
to the $100,000 limit per beneficiary). The aggregate beneficial
interests, thus, are $325,000. Hence, the maximum coverage afforded to
the account owner would be $500,000, the greater of $500,000 or
$325,000.)
(f) Joint revocable trust accounts. (1) Where an account described
in paragraph (a) of this section is established by more than one owner,
the respective interest of each account owner (which shall be deemed
equal) shall be insured separately, per different beneficiary, up to
the SMSIA, subject to the limitation imposed in paragraph (e) of this
section. Example 1: A and B, two individuals, establish a payable-on-
death account naming their three nieces as beneficiaries. Neither A nor
B has any other revocable trust accounts at the same NCUA-insured
credit union. The maximum coverage afforded to A and B would be
$600,000, determined by multiplying the number of owners (2) times the
SMSIA (currently $100,000) times the number of different beneficiaries
(3). In this example, A would be entitled to revocable trust coverage
of $300,000 and B would be entitled to revocable trust coverage of
$300,000. Example 2: A and B, two individuals, establish a payable-on-
death account naming their two children, two cousins and a charity as
beneficiaries. The balance in the account is $700,000. Neither A nor B
has any other revocable trust accounts at the same NCUA-insured credit
union. The maximum coverage would be determined under paragraph (a) of
this section by multiplying the number of account owners (2) times the
number of different beneficiaries (5) times $100,000, or $1 million.
Because the account balance is less than the maximum coverage amount,
the account would be fully insured.
Example 3: A and B, two individuals, establish a living trust
account with a balance of $1.5 million. Under the terms of the trust,
upon the death of both A and B, each of A's and B's three children is
entitled to $200,000, B's cousin is entitled to $150,000, A's friend is
entitled to $30,000, and the remaining amount ($720,000) goes to a
charity. Under paragraph (e) of this section, the maximum coverage, as
to each joint account owner, would be the greater of $500,000 or the
aggregate amount (as to each joint owner) of the interest of each
different beneficiary named in the trust, to a limit of $100,000 per
account owner per beneficiary. The beneficial interests in the trust
considered for purposes of determining coverage for account owner A
are: $300,000 for the children (three times $100,000), $75,000 for the
cousin, $15,000 for the friend, and $100,000 for the charity ($360,000
subject to the $100,000 per-beneficiary limitation). As to A, the
aggregate amount of the beneficial interests eligible for share
insurance coverage is $490,000. Hence, the maximum coverage afforded to
joint account owner A would be $500,000, the greater of $500,000 or
$490,000 (the aggregate of all the beneficial interests attributable to
A, limited to $100,000 per beneficiary). The same analysis and coverage
determination also would apply to B.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (f)(1) of this section, where the
owners of a joint revocable trust account are themselves the sole
beneficiaries of the corresponding trust, the account shall be insured
as a joint account under section 745.8 and shall not be insured under
the provisions of this section. Example: If A and B establish a
payable-on-death account naming themselves as the sole beneficiaries of
the account, the account will be insured as a joint account because the
account does not satisfy the intent requirement under paragraph (a) of
this section that the funds in the account belong to the named
beneficiaries upon the owners' death. The beneficiaries are in fact the
actual owners of the funds during the account owners' lifetimes.
(g) For accounts held in connection with a living trust that
provides for a life-estate interest for designated beneficiaries, NCUA
shall value each such life estate interest as the SMSIA for purposes of
determining the insurance coverage available to the account owner.
(h) Revocable trusts that become irrevocable trusts.
Notwithstanding the provisions in section 745.9-1 on the insurance
coverage of irrevocable trust accounts, a revocable trust account shall
continue to be insured under the provisions of this section even if the
corresponding revocable trust, upon the death of one or more of the
owners thereof, converts, in part or entirely, to an irrevocable trust.
Example: Assume A and B have a trust account in connection with a
living trust, of which they are joint grantors. If upon the death of
either A or B the trust transforms into an irrevocable trust as to the
deceased
[[Page 60622]]
grantor's ownership in the trust, the account will continue to be
insured under the provisions of this section.
(i) This section shall be effective as of October 14, 2008 for all
existing and future revocable trust accounts and for existing and
future irrevocable trust accounts resulting from formal revocable trust
accounts.
Appendix to Part 745--[Amended]
0
3. The appendix to part 745 is amended by removing Section B and by
redesignating Sections C through G as B through F respectively.
[FR Doc. E8-23922 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P