Classification Standards for Bingo, Lotto, Other Games Similar to Bingo, Pull Tabs and Instant Bingo as Class II Gaming When Played Through an Electronic Medium Using “Electronic, Computer, or Other Technologic Aids”, 60490-60491 [E8-23070]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
60490
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 198 / Friday, October 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
25 CFR Part 502
Definition for Electronic or
Electromechanical Facsimile
National Indian Gaming
Commission, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of
proposed rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS3
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming
Commission is withdrawing the
proposed modification to the definition
of ‘‘Electronic or electromechanical
facsimile’’ published in the Federal
Register on October 24, 2007. (72 FR
60482.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Hay at 202–632–7003; fax 202–632–
7066. These are not toll-free numbers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
Chairman Phil Hogen, The National
Indian Gaming Commission
(Commission) began its effort to craft
classification standards, of which this
amended definition was a part, in early
2004. The procedural mileposts leading
up to the publication of the proposed
rule, amended ‘‘Definition for Electronic
or Electromechanical Facsimile’’ 72 FR
60482 (October 24, 2007), are well
known and need not be recounted again
here.
About the reasons for this long effort,
much has been said and written, and
many and varied motives have been
ascribed to the Chairman and the
Commissioners. These likewise need
not be recited here.
A brief response is, however,
appropriate.
The Commission’s motivation has
always been the long-term health and
well-being of Indian gaming, for gaming
is the single greatest engine for
economic development in Indian
Country in history. As Chairman Hogen
has consistently said—though his words
have often been lost in the cacophony
of criticism—he perceives a risk to the
long-term well-being of Indian gaming
in the exploitation of technology as an
aid to the play of Class II games. IGRA,
of course, permits tribes ‘‘maximum
flexibility’’ in the use of technology in
Class II gaming, but it also does make a
distinction between Class II gaming and
Class III gaming. The risk arises when
the exploitation of technology erases, or
is perceived to erase, that distinction.
The risk itself is inchoate, but it could
take any of the following forms, to the
great detriment of Indian gaming. If
states perceive that tribes are playing
Class III games under the guise of Class
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:15 Oct 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
II gaming, they may expand legalized
gaming within their own borders, as the
State of Alabama is doing now. Indian
gaming operations located far from
population centers will be greatly
harmed as a result. Patrons will spend
their money downtown and closer to
home rather than driving out to the
reservation. If a perception that tribes
are not following IGRA becomes
sufficiently widespread, the Department
of Justice may bring Johnson Act
gambling device actions against tribal
gaming operations again. Tribes have
been successful in past litigation, but
those cases involved games that less
resemble slot machine than do games in
play today, and the outcome of litigation
over today’s games might be different.
Finally, Congress may choose to act, and
the Commission would not want to see
IGRA amended to restrict gaming or
otherwise changed to the detriment of
Indian tribes.
Throughout the long process of
crafting the Classification regulations
and amending the definition of
‘‘facsimile’’—throughout all of the
advisory committee meetings;
throughout all of the comment periods,
both formal and informal; throughout all
of the Congressional hearings—the
Commissioners have repeatedly stated
that it takes all comments to heart and
that until the day the Commission takes
final action, their minds are not made
up. These statements too were lost in
the cacophony.
The Commission understands the
terrific economic costs that the
Classification regulations and amended
definition will have on Indian gaming
and Indian Country, as set out in its two
economic impact reports, its cost-benefit
analysis, and in comments it received.
The Commission has heard from many
tribal leaders and representatives that
should the states, the Justice
Department or the Congress seek to act
against tribal gaming interests, the tribes
stand ready, willing, and able to address
those challenges head on. The
Commission has also heard that it
should seek alternatives to adopting
Classification regulations, for any
problems concerning classification are
local, rather than national, in scope. In
short, the Commission has heard that
the risks about which is concerned are
not as great as it fears and that the costs
of the Commission’s proposed solution
are too great. The Commission sincerely
hopes that the voices that have so
spoken are correct.
As Chairman Hogen stated at the June
5, 2008 Sovereignty Symposium in
Oklahoma City, the proposed rule,
‘‘Definition for Electronic or
Electromechanical Facsimile’’ 72 FR
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
60483, (October 24, 2007), is
withdrawn. This withdrawal does not
mean that the Commission believes
‘‘one-touch’’ bingo games are Class II.
Going forward, the Commission intends
to address this and other classification
issues through a combination of
training, technical assistance, and
enforcement actions.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
Philip N. Hogen,
Chairman, National Indian Gaming
Commission.
Norman H. DesRosiers,
Vice Chairman, National Indian Gaming
Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–23075 Filed 10–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
25 CFR Part 546
Classification Standards for Bingo,
Lotto, Other Games Similar to Bingo,
Pull Tabs and Instant Bingo as Class
II Gaming When Played Through an
Electronic Medium Using ‘‘Electronic,
Computer, or Other Technologic Aids’’
National Indian Gaming
Commission, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of
proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming
Commission is withdrawing the
proposed Classification standards
published in the Federal Register on
October 24, 2007. (72 FR 60483.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Hay at 202–632–7003; fax 202–632–
7066. These are not toll-free numbers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
Chairman Phil Hogen, The National
Indian Gaming Commission
(Commission) began its effort to craft
classification standards in early 2004.
The procedural mileposts leading up to
the publication of the proposed rule,
Classification Standards for Bingo,
Lotto, Etc. as Class II Gaming When
Played Through an Electronic Medium
Using ‘‘Electronic Computer, or Other
Technologic Aids,’’ 72 FR 60483,
(October 24, 2007), are well known and
need not be recounted again here.
About the reasons for this long effort,
much has been said and written, and
many and varied motives have been
ascribed to the Chairman and the
Commissioners. These likewise need
not be recited here.
A brief response is, however,
appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\10OCP3.SGM
10OCP3
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 198 / Friday, October 10, 2008 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS3
The Commission’s motivation has
always been the long-term health and
well-being of Indian gaming, for gaming
is the single greatest engine for
economic development in Indian
Country in history. As Chairman Hogen
has consistently said—though his words
have often been lost in the cacophony
of criticism—he perceives a risk to the
long-term well-being of Indian gaming
in the exploitation of technology as an
aid to the play of Class II games. IGRA,
of course, permits tribes ‘‘maximum
flexibility’’ in the use of technology in
Class II gaming, but it also does make a
distinction between Class II gaming and
Class III gaming. The risk arises when
the exploitation of technology erases, or
is perceived to erase, that distinction.
The risk itself is inchoate, but it could
take any of the following forms, to the
great detriment of Indian gaming. If
states perceive that tribes are playing
Class III games under the guise of Class
II gaming, they may expand legalized
gaming within their own borders, as the
State of Alabama is doing now. Indian
gaming operations located far from
population centers will be greatly
harmed as a result. Patrons will spend
their money downtown and closer to
home rather than driving out to the
reservation. If a perception that tribes
are not following IGRA becomes
sufficiently widespread, the Department
of Justice may bring Johnson Act
gambling device actions against tribal
gaming operations again. Tribes have
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:15 Oct 09, 2008
Jkt 217001
been successful in past litigation, but
those cases involved games that less
resemble slot machine than do games in
play today, and the outcome of litigation
over today’s games might be different.
Finally, Congress may choose to act, and
the Commission would not want to see
IGRA amended to restrict gaming or
otherwise changed to the detriment of
Indian tribes.
Throughout the long process of
crafting the Classification regulations—
throughout all of the advisory
committee meetings; throughout all of
the comment periods, both formal and
informal; throughout all of the
Congressional hearings—the
Commissioners have repeatedly stated
that it takes all comments to heart and
that until the day the Commission takes
final action, their minds are not made
up. These statements too were lost in
the cacophony.
The Commission understands the
terrific economic costs that the
Classification regulations will have on
Indian gaming and Indian Country, as
set out in its two economic impact
reports, its cost-benefit analysis, and in
comments it received. The Commission
has heard from many tribal leaders and
representatives that should the states,
the Justice Department or the Congress
seek to act against tribal gaming
interests, the tribes stand ready, willing,
and able to address those challenges
head on. The Commission has also
heard that it should seek alternatives to
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
60491
adopting Classification regulations, for
any problems concerning classification
are local, rather than national, in scope.
In short, the Commission has heard that
the risks about which is concerned are
not as great as it fears and that the costs
of the Commission’s proposed solution
are too great. The Commission sincerely
hopes that the voices that have so
spoken are correct.
As Chairman Hogen stated at the June
5, 2008 Sovereignty Symposium in
Oklahoma City, the proposed rule,
Classification Standards for Bingo,
Lotto, Etc. as Class II Gaming When
Played Through an Electronic Medium
Using ‘‘Electronic Computer, or Other
Technologic Aids,’’ 72 FR 60483,
(October 24, 2007), is withdrawn. This
withdrawal does not mean that the
Commission believes ‘‘one-touch’’ bingo
games are Class II. Going forward, the
Commission intends to address this and
other classification issues through a
combination of training, technical
assistance, and enforcement actions.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
Philip N. Hogen,
Chairman, National Indian Gaming
Commission.
Norman H. DesRosiers,
Vice Chairman, National Indian Gaming
Commission.
[FR Doc. E8–23070 Filed 10–9–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565–01–P
E:\FR\FM\10OCP3.SGM
10OCP3
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 198 (Friday, October 10, 2008)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60490-60491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23070]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Indian Gaming Commission
25 CFR Part 546
Classification Standards for Bingo, Lotto, Other Games Similar to
Bingo, Pull Tabs and Instant Bingo as Class II Gaming When Played
Through an Electronic Medium Using ``Electronic, Computer, or Other
Technologic Aids''
AGENCY: National Indian Gaming Commission, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of withdrawal of proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Indian Gaming Commission is withdrawing the
proposed Classification standards published in the Federal Register on
October 24, 2007. (72 FR 60483.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Hay at 202-632-7003; fax 202-632-
7066. These are not toll-free numbers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under Chairman Phil Hogen, The National
Indian Gaming Commission (Commission) began its effort to craft
classification standards in early 2004. The procedural mileposts
leading up to the publication of the proposed rule, Classification
Standards for Bingo, Lotto, Etc. as Class II Gaming When Played Through
an Electronic Medium Using ``Electronic Computer, or Other Technologic
Aids,'' 72 FR 60483, (October 24, 2007), are well known and need not be
recounted again here.
About the reasons for this long effort, much has been said and
written, and many and varied motives have been ascribed to the Chairman
and the Commissioners. These likewise need not be recited here.
A brief response is, however, appropriate.
[[Page 60491]]
The Commission's motivation has always been the long-term health
and well-being of Indian gaming, for gaming is the single greatest
engine for economic development in Indian Country in history. As
Chairman Hogen has consistently said--though his words have often been
lost in the cacophony of criticism--he perceives a risk to the long-
term well-being of Indian gaming in the exploitation of technology as
an aid to the play of Class II games. IGRA, of course, permits tribes
``maximum flexibility'' in the use of technology in Class II gaming,
but it also does make a distinction between Class II gaming and Class
III gaming. The risk arises when the exploitation of technology erases,
or is perceived to erase, that distinction.
The risk itself is inchoate, but it could take any of the following
forms, to the great detriment of Indian gaming. If states perceive that
tribes are playing Class III games under the guise of Class II gaming,
they may expand legalized gaming within their own borders, as the State
of Alabama is doing now. Indian gaming operations located far from
population centers will be greatly harmed as a result. Patrons will
spend their money downtown and closer to home rather than driving out
to the reservation. If a perception that tribes are not following IGRA
becomes sufficiently widespread, the Department of Justice may bring
Johnson Act gambling device actions against tribal gaming operations
again. Tribes have been successful in past litigation, but those cases
involved games that less resemble slot machine than do games in play
today, and the outcome of litigation over today's games might be
different. Finally, Congress may choose to act, and the Commission
would not want to see IGRA amended to restrict gaming or otherwise
changed to the detriment of Indian tribes.
Throughout the long process of crafting the Classification
regulations--throughout all of the advisory committee meetings;
throughout all of the comment periods, both formal and informal;
throughout all of the Congressional hearings--the Commissioners have
repeatedly stated that it takes all comments to heart and that until
the day the Commission takes final action, their minds are not made up.
These statements too were lost in the cacophony.
The Commission understands the terrific economic costs that the
Classification regulations will have on Indian gaming and Indian
Country, as set out in its two economic impact reports, its cost-
benefit analysis, and in comments it received. The Commission has heard
from many tribal leaders and representatives that should the states,
the Justice Department or the Congress seek to act against tribal
gaming interests, the tribes stand ready, willing, and able to address
those challenges head on. The Commission has also heard that it should
seek alternatives to adopting Classification regulations, for any
problems concerning classification are local, rather than national, in
scope. In short, the Commission has heard that the risks about which is
concerned are not as great as it fears and that the costs of the
Commission's proposed solution are too great. The Commission sincerely
hopes that the voices that have so spoken are correct.
As Chairman Hogen stated at the June 5, 2008 Sovereignty Symposium
in Oklahoma City, the proposed rule, Classification Standards for
Bingo, Lotto, Etc. as Class II Gaming When Played Through an Electronic
Medium Using ``Electronic Computer, or Other Technologic Aids,'' 72 FR
60483, (October 24, 2007), is withdrawn. This withdrawal does not mean
that the Commission believes ``one-touch'' bingo games are Class II.
Going forward, the Commission intends to address this and other
classification issues through a combination of training, technical
assistance, and enforcement actions.
Dated: September 24, 2008.
Philip N. Hogen,
Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.
Norman H. DesRosiers,
Vice Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.
[FR Doc. E8-23070 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7565-01-P
