National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Removal of Separate Category for Vaccines Containing Live, Oral, Rhesus-Based Rotavirus From the Vaccine Injury Table, 59528-59530 [E8-24017]
Download as PDF
59528
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. E8–24009 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
42 CFR Part 100
RIN 0906–AA55
National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program: Removal of Separate
Category for Vaccines Containing Live,
Oral, Rhesus-Based Rotavirus From
the Vaccine Injury Table
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Through this interim final
rule, the Secretary removes the category
of vaccines containing live, oral, rhesusbased rotavirus, Category XII, from the
Vaccine Injury Table (Table). The Table
includes a list of covered vaccines
under the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (VICP). The
VICP provides a system of no-fault
compensation for certain individuals
who have been injured by covered
childhood vaccines. This interim final
rule is technical in nature. Even prior to
the publication of this final rule,
Category XII, the category that is being
removed from the Table, only applied to
vaccines that were administered on or
before August 26, 2002. Given the
applicable statute of limitations and the
fact that Category XII limited its
application to vaccines administered on
or before August 26, 2002, the Secretary
believes that no persons have claims
that could be pursued under that
category. Petitioners may still be able to
file petitions relating to rotavirus
vaccines under Category XI of the Table,
the category of ‘‘rotavirus vaccines,’’
which does not include any associated
injuries. Although the Secretary believes
that the changes made in this interim
final rule are noncontroversial as they
do not affect the rights of any potential
petitioners with the VICP, the
Department is seeking public comment
on this interim final rule. Written
comments must be submitted on or
before November 10, 2008. The
Department will consider the comments
received and will decide whether to
amend the Table based on such
comments.
This regulation is effective
November 10, 2008.
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Oct 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
You may submit written
comments, identified by the Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 0906–AA55
by an any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: gevans@hrsa.gov. Include
RIN 0906–AA55 in the subject line of
the message.
• Mail: Geoffrey Evans, M.D.,
Director, Division of Vaccine Injury
Compensation, Healthcare Systems
Bureau, Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), Room 11C–26,
Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, Maryland 20857.
• Instructions: All submissions
received must include the agency name
and RIN for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be available for
public inspection and copying without
charge, including any personal
information provided, at Parklawn
Building, 5600 Fishers Lane Room 11C–
26, Rockville, Maryland 20857,
weekdays (Federal holidays excepted)
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5
p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Geoffrey Evans, M.D., Director, Division
of Vaccine Injury Compensation,
Healthcare Systems Bureau, Health
Resources and Services Administration,
Parklawn Building, Room 11C–26, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland
20857; telephone number (301) 443–
6593.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The National Childhood Vaccine
Injury Act of 1986, title III of Public Law
99–660 (42 U.S.C. 300aa–10 et seq.)
established the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (VICP) for
persons found to be injured by vaccines.
Under this Federal program, petitions
for compensation are filed with the
United States Court of Federal Claims
(Court). The Court, acting through
special masters, makes findings as to
eligibility for, and amount of,
compensation. In order to gain
entitlement to compensation under title
XXI of the Public Health Service (PHS)
Act for a covered vaccine, a petitioner
must establish a vaccine-related injury
or death, either by proving that the first
symptom of an injury/condition, as
defined by the Qualifications and Aids
to Interpretation, occurred within the
time period listed on the Vaccine Injury
Table (Table), and therefore presumed
to be caused by a vaccine (unless
another cause is found), or by proof of
vaccine causation, if the injury/
condition is not on the Table or did not
occur within the time period specified
on the Table.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The statute authorizing the VICP
provides for the inclusion of additional
vaccines in the VICP when they are
recommended by the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) for
routine administration to children. See
section 2114(e)(2) of the PHS Act, 42
U.S.C. 300aa–14(e)(2). Consistent with
section 13632(a)(3) of Public Law 103–
66, the regulations governing the VICP
provide that such vaccines will be
included in the Table as of the effective
date of an excise tax to provide funds
for the payment of compensation with
respect to such vaccines. (42 CFR
100.3(c)(5)). The statute authorizing the
VICP also authorizes the Secretary to
create and modify a list of injuries,
disabilities, illnesses, conditions, and
deaths (and their associated time
frames) associated with each category of
vaccines included on the Table. See
sections 2114(c)(3) and 2114(e)(2) of the
PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 300aa–14(c)(3) and
300aa–14(e)(2).
Because the prerequisites for adding
rotavirus vaccines to the VICP occurred,
the Secretary published a final rule in
the Federal Register (FR) on July 27,
1999, adding vaccines against rotavirus
to the Table (64 FR 40517). Because the
Secretary had not identified any illness,
disease, injury or condition caused by
vaccines against rotavirus, the category
of vaccines was added to the Table with
‘‘[n]o condition specified.’’ The
Secretary made clear that if he learned
of any such illness, disease, injury or
condition, he would consider amending
the Table.
In a notice of proposed rulemaking
published on July 13, 2001, the
Secretary announced his findings that
the condition of intussusception could
reasonably be determined in some
circumstances to be caused by vaccines
containing live, oral, rhesus-based
rotavirus (66 FR 36735). Based on those
findings, the Secretary proposed
amending the Table by adding to the
Table vaccines containing live, oral,
rhesus-based rotavirus (trade name
Rotashield) as a distinct category, with
intussusception listed as a covered
Table injury. This proposal was based
upon the recommendation by the CDC
that Rotashield, the only rotavirus
vaccine licensed in the United States
(U.S.) at the time, no longer be
administered to infants in the U.S.
based on review of data indicating a
strong association between Rotashield
and intussusception in the 1 to 2 weeks
following vaccination.
In a final rule published July 25, 2002,
the Secretary made the changes
proposed in the earlier rule (67 FR
48558). After these amendments, the
Table included two categories of
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
rotavirus vaccines. The first, the general
category of rotavirus vaccines (current
Category XI), did not include an
associated injury. This category of
vaccines was effective as of October 22,
1998, the effective date of the excise tax
enacted for rotavirus vaccines. See 42
CFR 100.3(a), 100.3(c)(3). The second,
the more specific category of vaccines
containing live, oral, rhesus-based
rotavirus (current Category XII),
contained an associated injury of
intussusception with an onset interval
of 0–30 days. This category of vaccines
was also effective on October 22, 1998,
but only applied to vaccines
administered on or before August 26,
2002 (the effective date of the final rule
imposing this category). Because the
manufacturer of the only U.S.-licensed
rotavirus vaccine voluntarily ceased
distribution of the vaccine in July 1999,
and because the CDC recommended that
this vaccine no longer be routinely
administered to children in the United
States in October 1999, the Secretary
concluded that it was unlikely that
potential claims under Category XII
would arise after the rule’s publication.
Because that final rule limited the Table
injury of intussusception to live, oral,
rhesus-based rotavirus vaccines
administered on or before the effective
date of the final rule, individuals who
sought compensation for injuries related
to such a vaccine administered after the
effective date of the final rule were not
entitled to the presumption of a Table
injury for intussusception. Such
individuals were still able to file claims
under the Table’s general category for
rotavirus vaccines. No claims had been
filed under the general category of
rotavirus vaccines from August 2004 to
January 2008. Licensure of a new
rotavirus vaccine in 2006 led to one
claim filed under this general category
since January 2008.
The Secretary views this rule as
technical in nature because he does not
believe that any potential petitioners
would be able to file a claim relying on
the Table condition set forth in Category
XII if it were retained on the Table. As
explained above, petitioners are already
limited to filing claims relying on this
Category if the underlying rotavirus
vaccine was administered on or before
August 26, 2002. Moreover, petitioners
are only entitled to the presumption of
causation conferred by the Table injury
associated with Category XII if the
injury of intussusception’s first
symptom or manifestation of onset
occurred within 0–30 days after the
vaccine’s administration. Because the
applicable statute of limitations requires
petitioners to file claims within three
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Oct 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
years of the injury’s first symptom or
manifestation of onset (or four years
from such onset and two years from the
date of death, in death cases), the
Secretary believes that any person with
a potential Table claim under Category
XII would be time-barred. The statute of
limitations available to certain
petitioners for vaccines or injuries
newly added to the Table under section
2116(b) of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C.
300aa–16(b), would no longer be
available for potential claims
concerning the rotavirus vaccine
because that section imposes a
limitations period of two years from the
effective date of the Table change.
Although the CDC in 1999
recommended that the only thenavailable rotavirus vaccine licensed in
the U.S. (which was a live, oral, rhesusbased product), no longer be
administered to infants in the U.S., FDA
has subsequently licensed two
additional rotavirus vaccines, and the
excise tax passed for rotavirus vaccines
remains in effect. Thus, the general
category of rotavirus vaccines continues
to be covered under the VICP under the
Table’s Category XI for all newly
licensed rotavirus vaccines. No
corresponding injury/condition is listed
in this category since no injuries have
been associated with these products.
Because the Table category of
rotavirus vaccines with the associated
injury of intussusception is no longer
available to prospective petitioners, this
interim final rule is an effort to
minimize confusion relating to available
Table categories.
All petitions filed concerning
rotavirus vaccines are still subject to the
applicable statute of limitations. The
filing limitations applicable to petitions
filed with the VICP are set out in section
2116(a) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C.
300aa–16(a)). Although section 2116(b)
of the PHS Act lays out specific
exceptions to these statutes of
limitations that apply when the effect of
a revision to the Table makes a
previously ineligible person eligible to
receive compensation or when an
eligible person’s likelihood of obtaining
compensation significantly increases,
this change would not trigger that
section.
Justification for Omitting Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking
This amendment to 42 CFR 100.3 is
technical in nature. As explained above,
the Secretary believes that no persons
have claims that could be pursued
under the category that is being
removed from the Table through this
interim final rule. For this reason, the
Secretary has determined under 5 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59529
553 and Departmental policy that it is
unnecessary and impractical to follow
proposed rulemaking procedures.
Economic and Regulatory Impact
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive
Order 12866
Executive Order 12866, as amended
by Executive Orders 13258 and 13422,
directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when rulemaking is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that provide the greatest net
benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health, safety,
distributive and equity effects). In
addition, under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, if a rule has a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities the Secretary must
specifically consider the economic
effect of a rule on small entities and
analyze regulatory options that could
lessen the impact of the rule. Executive
Order 12866, as amended by Executive
Orders 13258 and 13422, requires that
all regulations reflect consideration of
alternatives, of costs, of benefits, of
incentives, of equity, and of available
information. Regulations must meet
certain standards, such as avoiding an
unnecessary burden. Regulations which
are ‘‘significant’’ because of cost,
adverse effects on the economy,
inconsistency with other agency actions,
effects on the budget, or novel legal or
policy issues, require special analysis.
The Secretary has determined that no
resources are required to implement the
requirements in this Interim Final Rule.
Therefore, in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), and the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996,
which amended the RFA, the Secretary
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The Secretary has also determined
that this Interim Final Rule does not
meet the criteria for a major rule as
defined by Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Orders 13258
and 13422, and would have no major
effect on the economy or Federal
expenditures. The Secretary has
determined that the Interim Final Rule
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ within the
meaning of the statute providing for
Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking, 5 U.S.C. 801.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Similarly, it will not have effects on
State, local, and tribal governments and
on the private sector such as to require
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
59530
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
consultation under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
PART 100—VACCINE INJURY
COMPENSATION
Federalism Impact Statement
■
The Secretary has also reviewed this
Interim Final Rule in accordance with
Executive Order 13132 regarding
federalism, and has determined that it
does not have ‘‘federalism
implications.’’ The Interim Final Rule
would not have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, or on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’
Impact on Family Well-Being
This Interim Final Rule will not
adversely affect the following family
elements of family well-being: family
safety, family stability, marital
commitment; parental rights in the
education, nurture and supervision of
their children; family functioning,
disposable income or poverty; or the
behavior and personal responsibility of
youth, as determined under section
654(c) of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act of
1999. As stated above, this Interim Final
Rule will modify the Table included in
the regulations governing the VICP
based on legal authority.
1. The authority citation for 42 CFR
part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 215 of the PHS Act (42
U.S.C. 216); secs. 312 and 313 of Public Law
99–660, 100 Stat. 3779–3782 (42 U.S.C.
300aa–1 note); sec. 2114(c) and (e) of the PHS
Act, 100 Stat. 3766 and 107 Stat. 645–646 (42
U.S.C. 300aa–14(c) and (e)); sec. 904(b) of
Public Law 105–34, 111 Stat. 873; sec. 1503
of Public Law 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681–741;
and sec. 523(a) of Public Law 106–170, 113
Stat. 1927–1928.
§ 100.3
[Amended]
2. Section 100.3 is amended as
follows:
■ A. In paragraph (a) in the Vaccine
Injury Table remove Item XII and
redesignate Items XIII and XIV as XII
and XIII respectively.
■ B. In paragraph (c)(3) remove the
second sentence; in paragraph (c)(4)
remove the words ‘‘(Item XIII of the
Table)’’ and add in their place ‘‘(Item
XII of the Table)’’; in paragraph (c)(5)
remove the words ‘‘(Item XIV of the
Table)’’ and add in their place ‘‘(Item
XIII of the Table)’’.
■
[FR Doc. E8–24017 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Impact of the New Rule
Maritime Administration
This Interim Final Rule is technical in
nature and will not prevent otherwise
eligible individuals with claims of
injuries or deaths allegedly resulting
from rotavirus vaccines (including
vaccines containing live, oral, rhesusbased rotavirus) from filing claims with
the VICP.
46 CFR Part 393
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule has no information
collection requirements.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 100
Biologics, Health insurance, and
Immunization.
erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Dated: July 30, 2007.
Elizabeth M. Duke,
Administrator, HRSA.
Approved: June 23, 2008.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary, HHS.
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on Monday, October 6, 2008.
Accordingly, 42 CFR part 100 is
amended as set forth below.
■
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Oct 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
[Docket No. MARAD–2008 0096]
RIN 2133–AB70
America’s Marine Highway Program
Maritime Administration, DOT.
Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The purpose of this interim
final rule is to solicit recommendations
for short sea transportation routes to be
designated as Marine Highway
Corridors and to solicit applications
from interested parties to participate in
a short sea transportation Project, as
required by section 55605(c) of Public
Law 110–140, the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007. Section
55601(d) specifically states, that ‘‘[t]he
Secretary may designate a project to be
a short sea transportation project if the
Secretary determines that the project
may—offer a waterborne alternative to
available landside transportation
services using documented vessels; and
provide transportation services for
passengers or freight (or both) that may
reduce congestion on landside
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
infrastructure using documented
vessels.’’ Further, section 55605 defines
short sea transportation as meaning ‘‘the
carriage by vessel of cargo that is
contained in intermodal cargo
containers and loaded by crane on the
vessel or loaded on the vessel by means
of wheeled technology; and that is
loaded at a port in the United States and
unloaded either at another port in the
United States or at a port in Canada
located in the Great Lakes Saint
Lawrence Seaway System; or loaded at
a port in Canada located in the Great
Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway System
and unloaded at a port in the United
States.’’ Section 55605(c) directs the
Secretary of Transportation to
promulgate interim regulations not later
than 90 days after the date of enactment
of this Act. The Secretary of
Transportation will delegate authority to
the Maritime Administrator to
administer this program. Final
regulations are to be issued no later than
October 1, 2008. The program
established in Section 55605 will be
titled ‘‘America’s Marine Highway
Program.’’ A final regulation will be
published following this public
comment period. Solicitations from
applicants desiring Marine Highway
Project designation will be initiated
through notification in the Federal
Register at a future date.
DATES:
The effective date of this interim
regulation is November 10, 2008. Any
further comments are due by February
6, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
[identified by DOT Docket Number
MARAD–2008–0096] by any of the
following methods:
• Web Site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the electronic docket site.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room PL–401,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 of the
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 am and 5 pm, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this rulemaking. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided. Please
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59528-59530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-24017]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services Administration
42 CFR Part 100
RIN 0906-AA55
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Removal of Separate
Category for Vaccines Containing Live, Oral, Rhesus-Based Rotavirus
From the Vaccine Injury Table
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Through this interim final rule, the Secretary removes the
category of vaccines containing live, oral, rhesus-based rotavirus,
Category XII, from the Vaccine Injury Table (Table). The Table includes
a list of covered vaccines under the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program (VICP). The VICP provides a system of no-fault
compensation for certain individuals who have been injured by covered
childhood vaccines. This interim final rule is technical in nature.
Even prior to the publication of this final rule, Category XII, the
category that is being removed from the Table, only applied to vaccines
that were administered on or before August 26, 2002. Given the
applicable statute of limitations and the fact that Category XII
limited its application to vaccines administered on or before August
26, 2002, the Secretary believes that no persons have claims that could
be pursued under that category. Petitioners may still be able to file
petitions relating to rotavirus vaccines under Category XI of the
Table, the category of ``rotavirus vaccines,'' which does not include
any associated injuries. Although the Secretary believes that the
changes made in this interim final rule are noncontroversial as they do
not affect the rights of any potential petitioners with the VICP, the
Department is seeking public comment on this interim final rule.
Written comments must be submitted on or before November 10, 2008. The
Department will consider the comments received and will decide whether
to amend the Table based on such comments.
DATES: This regulation is effective November 10, 2008.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments, identified by the
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 0906-AA55 by an any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: gevans@hrsa.gov. Include RIN 0906-AA55 in the
subject line of the message.
Mail: Geoffrey Evans, M.D., Director, Division of Vaccine
Injury Compensation, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Health Resources and
Services Administration (HRSA), Room 11C-26, Parklawn Building, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the
agency name and RIN for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
available for public inspection and copying without charge, including
any personal information provided, at Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers
Lane Room 11C-26, Rockville, Maryland 20857, weekdays (Federal holidays
excepted) between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geoffrey Evans, M.D., Director,
Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, Healthcare Systems Bureau,
Health Resources and Services Administration, Parklawn Building, Room
11C-26, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; telephone number
(301) 443-6593.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, title III of
Public Law 99-660 (42 U.S.C. 300aa-10 et seq.) established the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) for persons found to be
injured by vaccines. Under this Federal program, petitions for
compensation are filed with the United States Court of Federal Claims
(Court). The Court, acting through special masters, makes findings as
to eligibility for, and amount of, compensation. In order to gain
entitlement to compensation under title XXI of the Public Health
Service (PHS) Act for a covered vaccine, a petitioner must establish a
vaccine-related injury or death, either by proving that the first
symptom of an injury/condition, as defined by the Qualifications and
Aids to Interpretation, occurred within the time period listed on the
Vaccine Injury Table (Table), and therefore presumed to be caused by a
vaccine (unless another cause is found), or by proof of vaccine
causation, if the injury/condition is not on the Table or did not occur
within the time period specified on the Table.
The statute authorizing the VICP provides for the inclusion of
additional vaccines in the VICP when they are recommended by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for routine
administration to children. See section 2114(e)(2) of the PHS Act, 42
U.S.C. 300aa-14(e)(2). Consistent with section 13632(a)(3) of Public
Law 103-66, the regulations governing the VICP provide that such
vaccines will be included in the Table as of the effective date of an
excise tax to provide funds for the payment of compensation with
respect to such vaccines. (42 CFR 100.3(c)(5)). The statute authorizing
the VICP also authorizes the Secretary to create and modify a list of
injuries, disabilities, illnesses, conditions, and deaths (and their
associated time frames) associated with each category of vaccines
included on the Table. See sections 2114(c)(3) and 2114(e)(2) of the
PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-14(c)(3) and 300aa-14(e)(2).
Because the prerequisites for adding rotavirus vaccines to the VICP
occurred, the Secretary published a final rule in the Federal Register
(FR) on July 27, 1999, adding vaccines against rotavirus to the Table
(64 FR 40517). Because the Secretary had not identified any illness,
disease, injury or condition caused by vaccines against rotavirus, the
category of vaccines was added to the Table with ``[n]o condition
specified.'' The Secretary made clear that if he learned of any such
illness, disease, injury or condition, he would consider amending the
Table.
In a notice of proposed rulemaking published on July 13, 2001, the
Secretary announced his findings that the condition of intussusception
could reasonably be determined in some circumstances to be caused by
vaccines containing live, oral, rhesus-based rotavirus (66 FR 36735).
Based on those findings, the Secretary proposed amending the Table by
adding to the Table vaccines containing live, oral, rhesus-based
rotavirus (trade name Rotashield) as a distinct category, with
intussusception listed as a covered Table injury. This proposal was
based upon the recommendation by the CDC that Rotashield, the only
rotavirus vaccine licensed in the United States (U.S.) at the time, no
longer be administered to infants in the U.S. based on review of data
indicating a strong association between Rotashield and intussusception
in the 1 to 2 weeks following vaccination.
In a final rule published July 25, 2002, the Secretary made the
changes proposed in the earlier rule (67 FR 48558). After these
amendments, the Table included two categories of
[[Page 59529]]
rotavirus vaccines. The first, the general category of rotavirus
vaccines (current Category XI), did not include an associated injury.
This category of vaccines was effective as of October 22, 1998, the
effective date of the excise tax enacted for rotavirus vaccines. See 42
CFR 100.3(a), 100.3(c)(3). The second, the more specific category of
vaccines containing live, oral, rhesus-based rotavirus (current
Category XII), contained an associated injury of intussusception with
an onset interval of 0-30 days. This category of vaccines was also
effective on October 22, 1998, but only applied to vaccines
administered on or before August 26, 2002 (the effective date of the
final rule imposing this category). Because the manufacturer of the
only U.S.-licensed rotavirus vaccine voluntarily ceased distribution of
the vaccine in July 1999, and because the CDC recommended that this
vaccine no longer be routinely administered to children in the United
States in October 1999, the Secretary concluded that it was unlikely
that potential claims under Category XII would arise after the rule's
publication. Because that final rule limited the Table injury of
intussusception to live, oral, rhesus-based rotavirus vaccines
administered on or before the effective date of the final rule,
individuals who sought compensation for injuries related to such a
vaccine administered after the effective date of the final rule were
not entitled to the presumption of a Table injury for intussusception.
Such individuals were still able to file claims under the Table's
general category for rotavirus vaccines. No claims had been filed under
the general category of rotavirus vaccines from August 2004 to January
2008. Licensure of a new rotavirus vaccine in 2006 led to one claim
filed under this general category since January 2008.
The Secretary views this rule as technical in nature because he
does not believe that any potential petitioners would be able to file a
claim relying on the Table condition set forth in Category XII if it
were retained on the Table. As explained above, petitioners are already
limited to filing claims relying on this Category if the underlying
rotavirus vaccine was administered on or before August 26, 2002.
Moreover, petitioners are only entitled to the presumption of causation
conferred by the Table injury associated with Category XII if the
injury of intussusception's first symptom or manifestation of onset
occurred within 0-30 days after the vaccine's administration. Because
the applicable statute of limitations requires petitioners to file
claims within three years of the injury's first symptom or
manifestation of onset (or four years from such onset and two years
from the date of death, in death cases), the Secretary believes that
any person with a potential Table claim under Category XII would be
time-barred. The statute of limitations available to certain
petitioners for vaccines or injuries newly added to the Table under
section 2116(b) of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-16(b), would no longer
be available for potential claims concerning the rotavirus vaccine
because that section imposes a limitations period of two years from the
effective date of the Table change.
Although the CDC in 1999 recommended that the only then-available
rotavirus vaccine licensed in the U.S. (which was a live, oral, rhesus-
based product), no longer be administered to infants in the U.S., FDA
has subsequently licensed two additional rotavirus vaccines, and the
excise tax passed for rotavirus vaccines remains in effect. Thus, the
general category of rotavirus vaccines continues to be covered under
the VICP under the Table's Category XI for all newly licensed rotavirus
vaccines. No corresponding injury/condition is listed in this category
since no injuries have been associated with these products.
Because the Table category of rotavirus vaccines with the
associated injury of intussusception is no longer available to
prospective petitioners, this interim final rule is an effort to
minimize confusion relating to available Table categories.
All petitions filed concerning rotavirus vaccines are still subject
to the applicable statute of limitations. The filing limitations
applicable to petitions filed with the VICP are set out in section
2116(a) of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 300aa-16(a)). Although section
2116(b) of the PHS Act lays out specific exceptions to these statutes
of limitations that apply when the effect of a revision to the Table
makes a previously ineligible person eligible to receive compensation
or when an eligible person's likelihood of obtaining compensation
significantly increases, this change would not trigger that section.
Justification for Omitting Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
This amendment to 42 CFR 100.3 is technical in nature. As explained
above, the Secretary believes that no persons have claims that could be
pursued under the category that is being removed from the Table through
this interim final rule. For this reason, the Secretary has determined
under 5 U.S.C. 553 and Departmental policy that it is unnecessary and
impractical to follow proposed rulemaking procedures.
Economic and Regulatory Impact
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Orders 13258 and
13422, directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, when rulemaking is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that provide the greatest net benefits (including
potential economic, environmental, public health, safety, distributive
and equity effects). In addition, under the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
if a rule has a significant economic effect on a substantial number of
small entities the Secretary must specifically consider the economic
effect of a rule on small entities and analyze regulatory options that
could lessen the impact of the rule. Executive Order 12866, as amended
by Executive Orders 13258 and 13422, requires that all regulations
reflect consideration of alternatives, of costs, of benefits, of
incentives, of equity, and of available information. Regulations must
meet certain standards, such as avoiding an unnecessary burden.
Regulations which are ``significant'' because of cost, adverse effects
on the economy, inconsistency with other agency actions, effects on the
budget, or novel legal or policy issues, require special analysis.
The Secretary has determined that no resources are required to
implement the requirements in this Interim Final Rule. Therefore, in
accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), and the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996, which amended the
RFA, the Secretary certifies that this rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The Secretary has also determined that this Interim Final Rule does
not meet the criteria for a major rule as defined by Executive Order
12866, as amended by Executive Orders 13258 and 13422, and would have
no major effect on the economy or Federal expenditures. The Secretary
has determined that the Interim Final Rule is not a ``major rule''
within the meaning of the statute providing for Congressional Review of
Agency Rulemaking, 5 U.S.C. 801.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Similarly, it will not have effects on State, local, and tribal
governments and on the private sector such as to require
[[Page 59530]]
consultation under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Federalism Impact Statement
The Secretary has also reviewed this Interim Final Rule in
accordance with Executive Order 13132 regarding federalism, and has
determined that it does not have ``federalism implications.'' The
Interim Final Rule would not have ``substantial direct effects on the
States, or on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.''
Impact on Family Well-Being
This Interim Final Rule will not adversely affect the following
family elements of family well-being: family safety, family stability,
marital commitment; parental rights in the education, nurture and
supervision of their children; family functioning, disposable income or
poverty; or the behavior and personal responsibility of youth, as
determined under section 654(c) of the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act of 1999. As stated above, this Interim Final Rule
will modify the Table included in the regulations governing the VICP
based on legal authority.
Impact of the New Rule
This Interim Final Rule is technical in nature and will not prevent
otherwise eligible individuals with claims of injuries or deaths
allegedly resulting from rotavirus vaccines (including vaccines
containing live, oral, rhesus-based rotavirus) from filing claims with
the VICP.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule has no information collection requirements.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 100
Biologics, Health insurance, and Immunization.
Dated: July 30, 2007.
Elizabeth M. Duke,
Administrator, HRSA.
Approved: June 23, 2008.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary, HHS.
Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the
Federal Register on Monday, October 6, 2008.
0
Accordingly, 42 CFR part 100 is amended as set forth below.
PART 100--VACCINE INJURY COMPENSATION
0
1. The authority citation for 42 CFR part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Sec. 215 of the PHS Act (42 U.S.C. 216); secs. 312
and 313 of Public Law 99-660, 100 Stat. 3779-3782 (42 U.S.C. 300aa-1
note); sec. 2114(c) and (e) of the PHS Act, 100 Stat. 3766 and 107
Stat. 645-646 (42 U.S.C. 300aa-14(c) and (e)); sec. 904(b) of Public
Law 105-34, 111 Stat. 873; sec. 1503 of Public Law 105-277, 112
Stat. 2681-741; and sec. 523(a) of Public Law 106-170, 113 Stat.
1927-1928.
Sec. 100.3 [Amended]
0
2. Section 100.3 is amended as follows:
0
A. In paragraph (a) in the Vaccine Injury Table remove Item XII and
redesignate Items XIII and XIV as XII and XIII respectively.
0
B. In paragraph (c)(3) remove the second sentence; in paragraph (c)(4)
remove the words ``(Item XIII of the Table)'' and add in their place
``(Item XII of the Table)''; in paragraph (c)(5) remove the words
``(Item XIV of the Table)'' and add in their place ``(Item XIII of the
Table)''.
[FR Doc. E8-24017 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P