Changes to Representation of Others Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 59513-59514 [E8-23908]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded under the Instruction
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under figure
2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental
documentation.
A final environmental analysis
checklist and a final categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced each day from 6 a.m.
to 6 p.m. on October 24, 2008 through
October 26, 2008. If the event concludes
prior to the scheduled termination time,
the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard onboard
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The
PATCOM may be contacted on VHF–FM
Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other Federal, State, or local
agencies.
Dated: September 25, 2008.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector San Diego.
[FR Doc. E8–23903 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am]
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
■
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 710, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
United States Patent and Trademark
Office
37 CFR Part 10
[Docket No. PTO–C–2005–0013]
2. A new temporary safety zone
§ 165.T11–033:
RIN 0651–AB55
§ 165.T11–033 Safety zone; BWRC ‘300’
Enduro; Lake Moolvalya, Parker, AZ.
Changes to Representation of Others
Before the United States Patent and
Trademark Office
erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES
■
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone are as follows: The Headgate Dam
at 34°11.20 N, 114°13.74 W following
the river northeast to 34°10.10 N,
114°16.61 W.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Oct 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
United States Patent and
Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59513
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (Office) published a
final rule in the Federal Register on
August 14, 2008, adopting new rules
governing the conduct of disciplinary
investigations, issuing warnings when
closing such investigations, disciplinary
proceedings, non-disciplinary transfer
to disability inactive status and
reinstatement to practice before the
Office. This document corrects
omissions in that final rule and amends
the Rules of Practice for consistency
with the final rule.
DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harry I. Moatz, Director of Enrollment
and Discipline (OED Director), directly
by telephone (571) 272–6069, by
facsimile to (571) 273–6069 marked to
the attention of Mr. Moatz, or by mail
addressed to: Mail Stop OED—Ethics
Rules, U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria,
Virginia 22313–1450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
published a final rule in the Federal
Register of August 14, 2008 (73 FR
47650), entitled ‘‘Changes to
Representation of Others Before the
United States Patent and Trademark
Office.’’ In that final rule, 37 CFR 10.4
is replaced and supplemented by
§ 11.23. Also in that final rule, there are
several references to ‘‘violation of any of
the Mandatory Disciplinary Rules
identified in § 10.20(b) of this
subchapter.’’ This document corrects
erroneous omissions from that final rule
as discussed below.
Section 10.4 inadvertently continued
to remain in Part 10 although it should
have been removed and reserved. Seven
of the examples of conduct that
constitute a violation of Mandatory
Disciplinary Rule § 10.23—i.e.,
§§ 10.23(c)(5), (c)(6), (c)(13), (c)(14),
(c)(15), (c)(16) and (c)(19)—and
Mandatory Disciplinary Rule § 10.31(c)
inadvertently continue to refer to rules
in Part 10 although the referenced rules
have been removed. They should refer
to existing rules. This document
corrects the text in the provisions of
§§ 10.23 and 10.31 to reference the
appropriate existing rules.
The final rule is corrected as follows.
Section 10.4 is removed and reserved
(the substance of § 10.4 has been
transferred and supplanted by § 11.23).
Section 10.23(c)(5) changes its reference
from ‘‘§ 10.6(c)’’ to ‘‘§ 11.6(c)’’ (the
substance of the former § 10.6(c) was
transferred to § 11.6(c)). Section
10.23(c)(6) changes its reference from
‘‘§ 10.158’’ to ‘‘§ 11.58’’ (the substance of
the former § 10.158 was transferred to
§ 11.58). Section 10.23(c)(13) changes its
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES
59514
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 197 / Thursday, October 9, 2008 / Rules and Regulations
reference from ‘‘§ 10.10(b)’’ to
‘‘§ 11.10(b)’’ (the substance of the former
§ 10.10(b) was transferred to § 11.10(b)).
Section 10.23(c)(14) changes its
reference from ‘‘§ 10.6’’ to ‘‘§ 11.6’’ (the
substance of the former § 10.6 was
transferred to § 11.6). Section
10.23(c)(15) changes its reference from
‘‘10.18’’ to ‘‘11.18’’ (the substance of the
former 10.18 was transferred to 11.18).
Section 10.23(c)(16) changes its
reference from ‘‘paragraph (b) of
§ 10.131’’ to ‘‘§ 11.22(b)’’ (the substance
of the former § 10.131(b) was included
in § 11.22(b)). Section 10.23(c)(19)
changes its reference from ‘‘§ 10.10(c)’’
to ‘‘§ 11.10(d)’’ (the substance of the
former § 10.10(c) was transferred to
§ 11.10(d)). Section 10.31(c) changes its
reference from ‘‘§ 10.14(b)’’ to
‘‘§ 11.14(b)’’ (the substance of the former
§ 10.14(b) was transferred to § 11.14(b)).
Section 553(d) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(d))
ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in the
effective date of final rules after the date
of their publication in the Federal
Register. This 30-day delay in effective
date can be waived, however, if an
agency finds for good cause that the
delay is impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest. The
change to 37 CFR 10.4 corrects a
technical error inasmuch as the
substance of § 10.4 was transferred to
and supplemented by § 11.23. The
changes in 37 CFR 10.23(c)(5), (c)(6),
(c)(13), (c)(14), (c)(15), (c)(16) and (c)(19)
and 10.31(c) correct a technical error in
referencing sections. The changes in 37
CFR 10.23(c)(5), (c)(6), (c)(13), (c)(14),
(c)(15), (c)(16) and (c)(19) and 10.31(c)
do not change the conduct expected of
practitioners from the final rule
published on August 14, 2008, but
merely correct the language consistent
with the existing and intended text. The
Office finds it impracticable to have a
30-day delayed effective date for these
technical corrections as practitioners
should not be misled or confused by
rules referring to removed provisions of
Part 10, and practitioners should not be
expected to abide by rules that have
been removed from Part 10.
Furthermore, the Office finds that it is
in the public’s interest to correct the
changes in text to avoid misleading
constructions of the rules. Therefore, the
Office is waiving the 30-day delay in
effective date for the technical
corrections in this notice.
Accordingly, the Patent and
Trademark Office makes the following
correcting amendments to 37 CFR part
10:
■
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 Oct 08, 2008
Jkt 214001
PART 10—REPRESENTATION OF
OTHERS BEFORE THE PATENT AND
TRADEMARK OFFICE
1. The authority citation for 37 CFR
part 10 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 500; 15 U.S.C. 1123; 35
U.S.C. 2, 6, 32, 41.
§ 10.4
[Removed and reserved]
2. Section 10.4 is removed and
reserved.
■ 3. Section 10.23 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c)(5), (c)(6), (c)(13),
(c)(14), (c)(15), (c)(16) and (c)(19) to read
as follows:
■
§ 10.23
Misconduct.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) Suspension or disbarment from
practice as an attorney or agent on
ethical grounds by any duly constituted
authority of a State or the United States
or, in the case of a practitioner who
resides in a foreign country or is
registered under § 11.6(c), by any duly
constituted authority of:
(i) A State,
(ii) The United States, or
(iii) The country in which the
practitioner resides.
(6) Knowingly aiding or abetting a
practitioner suspended or excluded
from practice before the Office in
engaging in unauthorized practice
before the Office under § 11.58.
*
*
*
*
*
(13) Knowingly preparing or
prosecuting or providing assistance in
the preparation or prosecution of a
patent application in violation of an
undertaking signed under § 11.10(b).
(14) Knowingly failing to advise the
Director in writing of any change which
would preclude continued registration
under § 11.6.
(15) Signing a paper filed in the Office
in violation of the provisions of § 11.18
or making a scandalous or indecent
statement in a paper filed in the Office.
(16) Willfully refusing to reveal or
report knowledge or evidence to the
Director contrary to § 10.24 or
§ 11.22(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(19) Action by an employee of the
Office contrary to the provisions set
forth in § 11.10(d).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 10.31 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 10.31 Communications concerning a
practitioner’s services.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Unless authorized under
§ 11.14(b), a non-lawyer practitioner
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
shall not hold himself or herself out as
authorized to practice before the Office
in trademark cases.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: October 1, 2008.
Jon W. Dudas,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. E8–23908 Filed 10–8–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3020
[Docket Nos. MC2008–7, CP2008–16 and
CP2008–17; Order No. 112]
Administrative Practice and Procedure,
Postal Service
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commission is adding a
new product identified as Global Plus 2
Negotiated Service Agreements to the
Mail Classification Schedule
Competitive Product List. This action is
consistent with changes in a recent law
governing postal operations. Republication of the lists of market
dominant and competitive products is
also consistent with new requirements
in the law.
DATES: Effective October 9, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
Regulatory
History, 73 FR 49723 (August 22, 2008).
The Postal Service seeks to add a new
product identified as Global Plus 2
Negotiated Service Agreements to the
Competitive Product List. For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission approves the Request.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On August 8, 2008, the Postal Service
filed a Request with the Commission for
the addition of a new product, which it
identifies as Global Plus 2 Negotiated
Service Agreements, to the Mail
Classification Schedule’s Competitive
Product List for prices not of general
applicability. A concurrent Notice
announces issuance of a Governors’
Decision authorizing the new product
and the Postal Service’s execution,
under this authority, of two contracts it
considers functionally equivalent.1
1 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Add Global Plus 2 Negotiated Service Agreements
to the Competitive Product List, and Notice of
E:\FR\FM\09OCR1.SGM
09OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 197 (Thursday, October 9, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59513-59514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23908]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Patent and Trademark Office
37 CFR Part 10
[Docket No. PTO-C-2005-0013]
RIN 0651-AB55
Changes to Representation of Others Before the United States
Patent and Trademark Office
AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office)
published a final rule in the Federal Register on August 14, 2008,
adopting new rules governing the conduct of disciplinary
investigations, issuing warnings when closing such investigations,
disciplinary proceedings, non-disciplinary transfer to disability
inactive status and reinstatement to practice before the Office. This
document corrects omissions in that final rule and amends the Rules of
Practice for consistency with the final rule.
DATES: Effective Date: October 9, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry I. Moatz, Director of Enrollment
and Discipline (OED Director), directly by telephone (571) 272-6069, by
facsimile to (571) 273-6069 marked to the attention of Mr. Moatz, or by
mail addressed to: Mail Stop OED--Ethics Rules, U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office published a final rule in the
Federal Register of August 14, 2008 (73 FR 47650), entitled ``Changes
to Representation of Others Before the United States Patent and
Trademark Office.'' In that final rule, 37 CFR 10.4 is replaced and
supplemented by Sec. 11.23. Also in that final rule, there are several
references to ``violation of any of the Mandatory Disciplinary Rules
identified in Sec. 10.20(b) of this subchapter.'' This document
corrects erroneous omissions from that final rule as discussed below.
Section 10.4 inadvertently continued to remain in Part 10 although
it should have been removed and reserved. Seven of the examples of
conduct that constitute a violation of Mandatory Disciplinary Rule
Sec. 10.23--i.e., Sec. Sec. 10.23(c)(5), (c)(6), (c)(13), (c)(14),
(c)(15), (c)(16) and (c)(19)--and Mandatory Disciplinary Rule Sec.
10.31(c) inadvertently continue to refer to rules in Part 10 although
the referenced rules have been removed. They should refer to existing
rules. This document corrects the text in the provisions of Sec. Sec.
10.23 and 10.31 to reference the appropriate existing rules.
The final rule is corrected as follows. Section 10.4 is removed and
reserved (the substance of Sec. 10.4 has been transferred and
supplanted by Sec. 11.23). Section 10.23(c)(5) changes its reference
from ``Sec. 10.6(c)'' to ``Sec. 11.6(c)'' (the substance of the
former Sec. 10.6(c) was transferred to Sec. 11.6(c)). Section
10.23(c)(6) changes its reference from ``Sec. 10.158'' to ``Sec.
11.58'' (the substance of the former Sec. 10.158 was transferred to
Sec. 11.58). Section 10.23(c)(13) changes its
[[Page 59514]]
reference from ``Sec. 10.10(b)'' to ``Sec. 11.10(b)'' (the substance
of the former Sec. 10.10(b) was transferred to Sec. 11.10(b)).
Section 10.23(c)(14) changes its reference from ``Sec. 10.6'' to
``Sec. 11.6'' (the substance of the former Sec. 10.6 was transferred
to Sec. 11.6). Section 10.23(c)(15) changes its reference from
``10.18'' to ``11.18'' (the substance of the former 10.18 was
transferred to 11.18). Section 10.23(c)(16) changes its reference from
``paragraph (b) of Sec. 10.131'' to ``Sec. 11.22(b)'' (the substance
of the former Sec. 10.131(b) was included in Sec. 11.22(b)). Section
10.23(c)(19) changes its reference from ``Sec. 10.10(c)'' to ``Sec.
11.10(d)'' (the substance of the former Sec. 10.10(c) was transferred
to Sec. 11.10(d)). Section 10.31(c) changes its reference from ``Sec.
10.14(b)'' to ``Sec. 11.14(b)'' (the substance of the former Sec.
10.14(b) was transferred to Sec. 11.14(b)).
Section 553(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553(d)) ordinarily requires a 30-day delay in the effective date of
final rules after the date of their publication in the Federal
Register. This 30-day delay in effective date can be waived, however,
if an agency finds for good cause that the delay is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. The change to 37 CFR
10.4 corrects a technical error inasmuch as the substance of Sec. 10.4
was transferred to and supplemented by Sec. 11.23. The changes in 37
CFR 10.23(c)(5), (c)(6), (c)(13), (c)(14), (c)(15), (c)(16) and (c)(19)
and 10.31(c) correct a technical error in referencing sections. The
changes in 37 CFR 10.23(c)(5), (c)(6), (c)(13), (c)(14), (c)(15),
(c)(16) and (c)(19) and 10.31(c) do not change the conduct expected of
practitioners from the final rule published on August 14, 2008, but
merely correct the language consistent with the existing and intended
text. The Office finds it impracticable to have a 30-day delayed
effective date for these technical corrections as practitioners should
not be misled or confused by rules referring to removed provisions of
Part 10, and practitioners should not be expected to abide by rules
that have been removed from Part 10. Furthermore, the Office finds that
it is in the public's interest to correct the changes in text to avoid
misleading constructions of the rules. Therefore, the Office is waiving
the 30-day delay in effective date for the technical corrections in
this notice.
0
Accordingly, the Patent and Trademark Office makes the following
correcting amendments to 37 CFR part 10:
PART 10--REPRESENTATION OF OTHERS BEFORE THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK
OFFICE
0
1. The authority citation for 37 CFR part 10 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 500; 15 U.S.C. 1123; 35 U.S.C. 2, 6, 32, 41.
Sec. 10.4 [Removed and reserved]
0
2. Section 10.4 is removed and reserved.
0
3. Section 10.23 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(5), (c)(6),
(c)(13), (c)(14), (c)(15), (c)(16) and (c)(19) to read as follows:
Sec. 10.23 Misconduct.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) Suspension or disbarment from practice as an attorney or agent
on ethical grounds by any duly constituted authority of a State or the
United States or, in the case of a practitioner who resides in a
foreign country or is registered under Sec. 11.6(c), by any duly
constituted authority of:
(i) A State,
(ii) The United States, or
(iii) The country in which the practitioner resides.
(6) Knowingly aiding or abetting a practitioner suspended or
excluded from practice before the Office in engaging in unauthorized
practice before the Office under Sec. 11.58.
* * * * *
(13) Knowingly preparing or prosecuting or providing assistance in
the preparation or prosecution of a patent application in violation of
an undertaking signed under Sec. 11.10(b).
(14) Knowingly failing to advise the Director in writing of any
change which would preclude continued registration under Sec. 11.6.
(15) Signing a paper filed in the Office in violation of the
provisions of Sec. 11.18 or making a scandalous or indecent statement
in a paper filed in the Office.
(16) Willfully refusing to reveal or report knowledge or evidence
to the Director contrary to Sec. 10.24 or Sec. 11.22(b).
* * * * *
(19) Action by an employee of the Office contrary to the provisions
set forth in Sec. 11.10(d).
* * * * *
0
4. Section 10.31 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 10.31 Communications concerning a practitioner's services.
* * * * *
(c) Unless authorized under Sec. 11.14(b), a non-lawyer
practitioner shall not hold himself or herself out as authorized to
practice before the Office in trademark cases.
* * * * *
Dated: October 1, 2008.
Jon W. Dudas,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. E8-23908 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P