Proposed Agency Information Collection, 58945 [E8-23895]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 8, 2008 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Agency Information
Collection
U.S. Department of Energy.
Notice of Proposed Data
Collection and Request for Comments.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy as
part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on a proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–103 (44 U.S.C. 3506
(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before December 8,
2008.
ADDRESSES: T. Fitzsimmons, SC–22.2/
Germantown Building, U.S. Department
of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave.,
SW., Washington, DC 20585–1290.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Fitzsimmons, Office of
Science, Office Basic Energy Sciences,
Materials Sciences and Engineering
Division, SC–22.2
Tim.Fitzsimmons@science.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Abstract: The information collected
on aspects of the research environment
will provide a number of insights on the
determinants of scientific research
advances and innovation. These can be
used to improve the future impact of
science programs. It will also help to
build a science about science and
innovation policy, as part of the
National Science Foundation (NSF)
program by that name. In addition to
DOE funding, the NSF has funded the
Center for Innovation at the University
of Maryland to test hypotheses about the
determinants of innovation in 72
research projects selected from five
national laboratories of the Department
of Energy and the National
Oceanographic and Atmospheric
Administration. The projects will be
selected by the middle managers in
these national laboratories to reflect four
kinds of innovation profiles: small
scope incremental innovation, smallscope radical innovation, large scope
incremental innovation, large scope
radical innovation. Extent and type of
innovation is defined by project
mangers and peers. The projects will be
located in departments and centers that
reflect five different scientific and
engineering disciplines: chemistry,
biology, material sciences, alternative
energy, and geophysical science. A
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:10 Oct 07, 2008
Jkt 217001
survey to measure the determinants of
innovation that has been carefully
developed over several years will be
given to all members of small scope
projects and at least 25 members of large
scope projects plus a 50 percent random
sample of non-members of these
projects in the departments and centers
of the national laboratory where the
projects are located.
Middle managers will be interviewed
about the characteristics of their
discipline to determine if the tests of the
hypotheses are robust and independent
of disciplinary effects. They will also be
asked to report any policies for
encouraging the construction of
complex research teams and crossfertilization, two main themes in the
survey. This information will be used to
determine if these policies increase
communication and technical exchange
within and across research teams. Top
managers will also be interviewed about
strategies to build diverse work teams
and encourage the exchange of
information. Finally, it is anticipated
that project leaders will be interviewed
several years later to measure the
amount of innovation obtained in their
projects to validate the assessments of
the middle managers.
2. Method of Data Collection: The
Center for Innovation will collect this
information by interviews with the
managers and electronically with
customized Research Environment
Survey web sites at each of the research
organizations to facilitate the data
collection.
This information collection request
contains: (1) OMB Number New; (2)
Information Collection Request Title:
Developing the Science of Science and
Innovation Policy: Profiles of
Innovativeness and Effective Research
Communication; (3) Type of Review:
New; (4) Affected Public: Federal civil
servants, the managers and researchers
in the research organizations; (5)
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,800 researchers and 132 project
leaders and managers; (6) Estimated
Time per response: One half hour for the
1,800 researchers and one hour for the
132 project leaders and managers; (7)
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:
900 hours for researchers and 132 hours
for project leaders and the managers in
FY 2008 and FY 2009; (8) Estimated
Total Annual Cost: $54,510 total in
FY2008 and FY2009, based on a mean
hourly wage of $52.82 for engineering
managers from the 2006 National
Compensation Survey of the Bureau of
Labor Statistics. It is likely that this
figure does not include national
laboratory overheard; and (9)
Respondents’ Obligation: Voluntary.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
58945
Request for comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden (including hours and cost)
of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the data
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection.
They also will become a matter of
public record.
Statutory Authority: Sec. 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13).
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 3,
2008.
Raymond L. Orbach,
Under Secretary for Science.
[FR Doc. E8–23895 Filed 10–7–08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Senior Executive Service; Performance
Review Board
U.S. Department of Energy.
SES Performance Review Board
Standing Register.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice provides the
Performance Review Board Standing
Register for the Department of Energy.
This listing supersedes all previously
published lists of PRB members.
DATES: Effective Date: These
appointments are effective as of
September 22, 2008.
ADAMS, VINCENT NMN
ALLISON, JEFFREY M
AMARAL, DAVID M
ANDERSON, CYNTHIA V
ANDERSON, MARGOT H
ANGULO, VERONICA A
AOKI, STEVEN NMN
ARMSTRONG, DAVID J
ASCANIO, XAVIER NMN
BACA, MARK C
BAKER, KENNETH E
BARKER JR, WILLIAM L
BARWELL, OWEN F
BASHISTA, JOHN R
BATTERSHELL, CAROL J
BAUER, CARL O
BEAMON, JOSEPH A
BEARD, JEANNE M
BEARD, SUSAN F
E:\FR\FM\08OCN1.SGM
08OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 58945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E8-23895]
[[Page 58945]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Agency Information Collection
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Data Collection and Request for Comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy as part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on a
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-103 (44 U.S.C. 3506
(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before December 8,
2008.
ADDRESSES: T. Fitzsimmons, SC-22.2/Germantown Building, U.S. Department
of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585-1290.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Fitzsimmons, Office of
Science, Office Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and
Engineering Division, SC-22.2 Tim.Fitzsimmons@science.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Abstract: The information collected on aspects of the research
environment will provide a number of insights on the determinants of
scientific research advances and innovation. These can be used to
improve the future impact of science programs. It will also help to
build a science about science and innovation policy, as part of the
National Science Foundation (NSF) program by that name. In addition to
DOE funding, the NSF has funded the Center for Innovation at the
University of Maryland to test hypotheses about the determinants of
innovation in 72 research projects selected from five national
laboratories of the Department of Energy and the National Oceanographic
and Atmospheric Administration. The projects will be selected by the
middle managers in these national laboratories to reflect four kinds of
innovation profiles: small scope incremental innovation, small-scope
radical innovation, large scope incremental innovation, large scope
radical innovation. Extent and type of innovation is defined by project
mangers and peers. The projects will be located in departments and
centers that reflect five different scientific and engineering
disciplines: chemistry, biology, material sciences, alternative energy,
and geophysical science. A survey to measure the determinants of
innovation that has been carefully developed over several years will be
given to all members of small scope projects and at least 25 members of
large scope projects plus a 50 percent random sample of non-members of
these projects in the departments and centers of the national
laboratory where the projects are located.
Middle managers will be interviewed about the characteristics of
their discipline to determine if the tests of the hypotheses are robust
and independent of disciplinary effects. They will also be asked to
report any policies for encouraging the construction of complex
research teams and cross-fertilization, two main themes in the survey.
This information will be used to determine if these policies increase
communication and technical exchange within and across research teams.
Top managers will also be interviewed about strategies to build diverse
work teams and encourage the exchange of information. Finally, it is
anticipated that project leaders will be interviewed several years
later to measure the amount of innovation obtained in their projects to
validate the assessments of the middle managers.
2. Method of Data Collection: The Center for Innovation will
collect this information by interviews with the managers and
electronically with customized Research Environment Survey web sites at
each of the research organizations to facilitate the data collection.
This information collection request contains: (1) OMB Number New;
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Developing the Science of
Science and Innovation Policy: Profiles of Innovativeness and Effective
Research Communication; (3) Type of Review: New; (4) Affected Public:
Federal civil servants, the managers and researchers in the research
organizations; (5) Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,800 researchers
and 132 project leaders and managers; (6) Estimated Time per response:
One half hour for the 1,800 researchers and one hour for the 132
project leaders and managers; (7) Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:
900 hours for researchers and 132 hours for project leaders and the
managers in FY 2008 and FY 2009; (8) Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$54,510 total in FY2008 and FY2009, based on a mean hourly wage of
$52.82 for engineering managers from the 2006 National Compensation
Survey of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It is likely that this figure
does not include national laboratory overheard; and (9) Respondents'
Obligation: Voluntary.
Request for comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the data collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection. They also will become a matter of public record.
Statutory Authority: Sec. 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13).
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 3, 2008.
Raymond L. Orbach,
Under Secretary for Science.
[FR Doc. E8-23895 Filed 10-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P